Next Article in Journal
Deployable Deep Learning Models for Crack Detection: Efficiency, Interpretability, and Severity Estimation
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Scale Modification of Sodium Polyacrylate-Modified Cement Grouts: Rheology, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on Behavioral Characteristics of the Elderly in Suburban Villages and Strategies for Age-Friendly Adaptation of Building Spaces Based on New Time–Geography

1
School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2
Institute of Future Human Habitats, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen 518071, China
3
College of Architecture and Landscape, Peking University, Beijing 100817, China
4
Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center for Human Settlements, Wuhan 430072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(18), 3361; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183361
Submission received: 9 August 2025 / Revised: 12 September 2025 / Accepted: 13 September 2025 / Published: 17 September 2025

Abstract

With the acceleration of global population aging, rural areas face particularly severe challenges due to youth outmigration and uneven resource distribution. Taking Jiashan Village in Wuhan as a case study, this research combines the planning–activity model of new time–geography with Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to investigate the behavioral and emotional characteristics of the elderly and their spatial adaptation requirements. Using GPS tracking of 30 participants, questionnaires (152 valid responses; 73.4% response rate), facial expression recognition, and the stated preference (SP) method, the study classified elderly lifestyles into four types: leisure-oriented, agricultural-labor-oriented, caregiving-oriented, and self-employment-oriented. The results show significant heterogeneity in spatial needs, social intensity, and emotional responses. A quantitative analysis using the multinomial logit model indicates that farmland optimization had the greatest positive utility (+1.5873), followed by the addition of new plazas and leisure facilities, both significantly enhancing satisfaction. A correlation analysis further revealed that prolonged use of farmland, parks, and walking paths was negatively correlated with satisfaction, underscoring the urgency of targeted renovations. On this basis, the study proposes a three-tiered demand framework of “local service–social interaction–personal value”, offering both theoretical support and practical strategies for multi-level and collaborative retrofitting of suburban rural public spaces, aiming to mitigate “aging depression” and promote urban–rural integration.

1. Introduction

The global wave of population aging is reshaping the world’s social, economic, and spatial landscapes at an unprecedented rate [1,2,3]. By 2050, the global population aged 65 and above will reach 1.6 billion, accounting for approximately 16% of the world’s population [4]. Against this backdrop, governments around the world have been actively promoting aging-related research [5]. In particular, the Global Network of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities, a concept developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), emphasizes the creation of an age-friendly environment [6] that enhances elderly individuals’ ability to gain access to the required places (physical environment) and to the required people (social environment) [7] to enable them to continue to participate in social, economic, livelihood, and sporting activities and to guarantee their quality of life as they age [8].
By the end of 2024, the elderly population aged 60 and above accounted for 22.0% of the total population in China, while the elderly population aged 65 and above accounted for 15.6% of the total population, representing increases of 5.9% and 5.1%, respectively, compared to the data regarding 2015, demonstrating a trend of gradual increase year by year [9]. China, as one of the countries with the most rapidly aging populations in the world [10], faces greater challenges in rural areas, where the aging rate is significantly higher than in cities due to the outmigration of young adults and declining fertility [11]. This leads to a growing phenomenon of “aging depression,” characterized by sparse elderly populations and weak service provision [12]. Meanwhile, in the process of China’s urbanization, rural areas are in a disadvantaged position in terms of policy support [13], resource allocation, and infrastructure construction. This development imbalance has led to a serious mismatch between public activity space supply and the demands of elderly rural residents, making it difficult to meet their needs for daily communication and recreation [14].
In recent years, China has implemented a rural revitalization strategy, injecting new development opportunities into rural construction [15]. However, in some remote villages with low population density and dispersed elderly residents, large-scale age-friendly adaptations are both costly and likely to be underutilized, thereby posing challenges in realizing the anticipated economic benefits [16]. Suburban rural areas, as a special geographical unit [17], offer more favorable conditions due to their proximity to cities, higher population density, and better infrastructure [18]. Additionally, the trend of part-time employment and non-farming in suburban villages has diversified villagers’ lifestyles, blending urban and rural habits [19]. Hence, the age-friendly transformation of suburban rural public spaces must reconcile both modern and traditional needs rather than applying a uniform urban-centric model.
This study takes Jiashan Village in Wuhan City as an example and aims to achieve three breakthroughs by integrating the spatial–temporal behavior analysis of new time–geography with the hierarchical framework of Maslow’s needs theory by first dynamically analyzing the spatial–temporal differentiation of elderly activity patterns and their correlation with emotional changes and identifying the priority of differentiated transformation; secondly, an evaluation model of demand space satisfaction is constructed to quantify the interaction between facility usage and emotional feedback; and, thirdly, a multi-subject collaborative age-friendly adaptation strategy is proposed to promote the transformation of suburban and rural areas from passive adaptation to active empowerment, providing a theoretical and practical basis for addressing aging depression and urban–rural integration development.
To situate these objectives within the existing body of knowledge, it is necessary to review how age-friendly retrofitting research has evolved internationally and within China, and to identify the theoretical gaps that this study seeks to fill.

2. Literature Review

Over the past few decades, both theoretical research and practical efforts in age-friendly retrofitting have achieved notable progress worldwide [20]. A growing consensus among scholars emphasizes that standards for such transformations should be grounded in the specific needs of the elderly population [21,22]. Developed countries, which encountered aging challenges earlier [23], initiated studies on age-friendly environments as early as the 1990s [24]. Their development can be broadly divided into three key phases.
In the first phase, the focus was on the material dimension of space. Retrofitting strategies were led primarily by architectural and engineering perspectives, emphasizing standardized and universal design principles for barrier-free environments. Older adults were often viewed as a homogeneous group. For example, France’s Planning and Design for the Elderly established criteria for age-friendly public spaces in rural areas [25], while Japan’s Welfare Law for Rural Areas introduced differentiated facilities based on village aging rates [26].
In the second phase, attention shifted to the social dimension of aging. Researchers began to recognize the heterogeneity in health status, psychological conditions, and social engagement among elderly individuals [27]. In the early 2000s, the U.S. introduced the concept of Active Adult Retirement Communities (AARCs) in suburban settings [28], classifying seniors into “active” (65–75), “frail” (75–85), and “dependent” (85+) categories and designing spatial and service strategies accordingly [29].
The third phase marks the rise of technologically precise approaches. With advances in big data and smart technologies, age-friendly transformation has become increasingly data-driven. This phase emphasizes accurately identifying user needs through real-time monitoring and intelligent systems. For instance, in Maryland, wearable sensor data are used to track seniors’ movement patterns and facility usage, enabling dynamic and responsive adjustments in service provision [30]. Collectively, these developments illustrate an evolution from physical infrastructure to social interaction and then to intelligent response systems. This “material–social–technological” trajectory offers a comprehensive, systematic, and adaptable theoretical framework.
In comparison, China entered an aging society relatively late, in 1999 [31]. Although the research on age-friendly transformation started later, it has achieved notable progress over the past two decades. The early studies focused on the relationship between older adults and the physical environment. Scholars such as Zhou Yanmin were pioneers in proposing age-friendly design principles for residential areas [27]. Later, researchers like Li Yuanyuan systematically examined the physical, social, cultural, and institutional dimensions of age-friendliness, building a comprehensive and sustainable framework for transformation [32]. With the rise of big data and related technologies, scholars such as Wang Luyu further explored community planning strategies based on the spatial–temporal behavior of elderly individuals at the micro scale [33].
However, despite the progress achieved in age-friendly environmental research, three major limitations remain. First, most existing studies are urban-centric, lacking adaptive exploration into the living characteristics and spatial constraints of the rural elderly [34]—particularly those residing in suburban village contexts. As a result, the applicability of these studies to rural settings remains limited [35]. Second, the current research tends to rely excessively on single-dimensional demographic classifications, overlooking the dynamic differentiation in the spatial–temporal behavior patterns of older adults. This reductionist approach has led to the widespread adoption of top-down supply-driven retrofitting strategies, resulting in mismatched facilities and inefficient spatial use [36]. Consequently, the complex needs of rural elderly individuals—ranging from service accessibility and social interaction to personal value realization—are often inadequately addressed [37]. Third, the existing studies often focus on physical improvements at the micro scale while neglecting the dynamic interrelationships among behavior, emotion, and space [38,39]. They fail to acknowledge how emotional feedback influences spatial perception and satisfaction, thus limiting the human-centered depth of age-friendly transformation strategies [40]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an age-friendly public space retrofitting framework that is tailored to rural contexts and responsive to the diverse needs of elderly residents.
To address these shortcomings, scholars have turned to theoretical perspectives that can better capture the dynamics of elderly behavior and needs. Among them, the space–time path approach of new time–geography provides a valuable analytical tool. Compared with the traditional time–geography proposed by Hagstrom, this theory shifts from “absolute spacetime” to “relative spacetime”, emphasizing the dynamic relationship between social and cultural constraints and individual organizational interactions [41]. It can accurately capture the spatial–temporal behavior patterns of elderly people in their “daily life circle” and reveal the coupling mechanism between their activity preferences and emotional needs [42]. At the same time, the hierarchical logic of Maslow’s needs theory can further map behavioral characteristics to the hierarchy of needs [43,44], providing value orientation for spatial optimization. The combination of the two can not only make up for the shortcomings of the existing research in behavioral dynamics and demand complexity but also provide a systematic path for the coordinated optimization of a “space service system” for the age-friendly adaptation of suburban and rural areas [45].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Introduction to the Study Area

Jiashan Village is a village under the Datan Area of the Yangtze River New Area in Wuhan City, Hubei Province (Figure 1), located in the western part of Wuhan City, mainly engaged in non-agricultural production, spatially belonging to a typical suburban village. At present, Jashan Village is the future expansion area of Wuhan City, with better economic conditions and development prospects, and it has the economic basis for age-friendly adaptation.
The aging issue in Jiashan Village is particularly severe compared to other areas within Datan Area, with the proportion of the elderly close to 30%. Among them, there are more elderly people living alone, so there is major demand for age-friendly adaptation. At the same time, unlike traditional villages, Jiashan Village has a high level of urbanization, and local elderly people have a richer daily lifestyle while retaining their traditional living habits, which helps in carrying out a study on the classification of spatial and temporal behaviors of the elderly in a typical geographic area.
Through a preliminary survey on the basic situation of the group over 55 years old in Jiashan Village, 73% of the respondents were between 60 and 80 years old. In terms of income, most of the respondents had a monthly income of CNY 300 to 1000, accounting for 47 percent of the total, and about 10 percent of the elderly had only a low income (Figure 2).
The village’s current public activity spaces are concentrated on the northeast and southeast sides of the village bay, with relatively complete facilities (Figure 3), including a villagers’ activity center, chess and card room, convenience store, collection point, health clinic, road, small park, small garden, market, farmland, and riverbank walkway, covering different types of activity spaces. However, some of the current public spaces in the village cannot fully meet the needs of the elderly groups in Jiashan Village due to the low level of aging of the facilities and environment, and they are in urgent need of renewal and renovation.

3.2. Research Methodology and Technical Route

Based on the theory of new time–geography, this study systematically constructs a logical system for the study of age-friendly adaptation retrofit strategies in suburban villages (Figure 4). The technical route encompasses three key stages: firstly, collecting and categorizing spatial–temporal behavior data from the elderly population to dissect the spatial demand characteristics of various elderly groups; secondly, analyzing the current status of age-friendly adaptation in activity spaces, quantifying the level of satisfaction with these adaptations, and pinpointing the causes of mismatches between facility supply and demand; and, thirdly, simulating age-friendly decision-making processes for activity spaces to ascertain renovation preferences. This provides comprehensive methodological support for optimizing rural age-friendly adaptation.

3.2.1. Data Collection and Classification Methods for Spatial–Temporal Behavior of the Elderly Population

  • Basic Spatial–Temporal Behavior Data of the Elderly Collection
Behavioral data collection is the basis for research and planning of age-friendly adaptations for villagers. Currently, the main methods for collecting spatial and temporal data on individual activities and travel behaviors are traditional activity log surveys, GPS-based mobile data collection methods, and LBS-based mobile data collection methods for cell phones [46]. According to the current situation of Jiashan Village, considering the villagers’ concerns about personal privacy and the lack of smartphone penetration, the survey method adopted in this study is to provide the elderly with a GPS positioning device, supplemented by a questionnaire to obtain spatial and temporal data on the elderly’s individual behavior.
Individual behavioral data include trajectories and activity logs of experimental participants at specific times. The trajectory refers to the spatial–temporal information of participants 24 h a day within a week. The activity log includes activity information and travel information. Activity information includes the start time, end time, facility type, activity type, companions, and satisfaction evaluation of each activity. Travel information includes the start time, end time, transportation method, companions, and satisfaction evaluation of each trip.
After the participants and researchers signed the survey agreement, the researchers provided GPS positioning devices and paper forms that needed to be filled out. During the experiment, the researchers required participants to charge their devices at regular intervals every day for the next experimental period and have them carry devices with them. Participants were also asked to fill in their activity and travel information on paper forms based on the previous day’s trajectory during their free time the next day. If participants found it inconvenient to fill in during the process, they could contact the researcher by phone through verbal description. The researcher would fill in the information on their behalf and ensure accuracy. The complete experimental process is shown in Figure 5.
For the convenience of subsequent spatial–temporal behavior analysis and spatial satisfaction analysis, activity spaces are categorized based on two dimensions: physical location and attributed nature (Table 1). This classification framework is designed to systematically capture the complexity of spaces used by older adults. The “physical location” dimension (Indoor/Outdoor) reflects a space’s physical and sensory attributes, which directly affect comfort and accessibility. The “attributed nature” dimension (Public/Private) captures socio-functional properties, which govern the kinds of activities and social interactions a space facilitates. By moving beyond a simplistic binary classification, this two-dimensional framework offers a more nuanced perspective for analyzing the interplay between older adults’ behavior, emotional experience, and spatial environment. It enables the identification of discrepancies between spatial supply and the diverse needs of different elderly lifestyles, thereby providing a critical foundation for proposing targeted age-friendly adaptations.
  • Lifestyle Classification Methodology Based on New Time–Geography
Although the new time–geography has explored and innovated in research perspectives and research methods to meet the changing needs of the times [47], it retains path, prism, and constraint as the iconic concepts and analytical tools of the time–geography method. The most basic concept of time–geography is space–time path [48], which represents the uninterrupted trajectory formed by the path of an individual under a three-dimensional space–time coordinate system [49]. Combined with previous research, it represents people’s activities in time and space and their social interactions from a visualization perspective [50,51].
In the analytical framework of the new time–geography, spatial–temporal activities place greater emphasis on subjectivity and meaning and the re-conceptualization of place and place (Figure 6), where places are not just spatial locations but sites endowed with social meaning, emotional connection, and identity [52,53]; therefore, the content of activities and subjective feelings of different individuals in the same place are also important to analyze in this study. Moreover, the new time–geography in applied research clusters and analyzes the daily life patterns of different groups of people, providing important implications for this study [54]. At present, research has developed an ArcGIS extension of Activity Pattern Analyst [55], which is the main method adopted in this study’s analysis based on Hägerstrand’s time-frequency concepts.
Specifically, this study combines the spatial–temporal behavior data of elderly people collected in the previous step to identify their important fixed positions and time points of the day and constructs an individual spatial–temporal path. By comparing the space–time pace, activity ranges, and activity times of different elderly people, integrating their personal data, identifying differences and commonalities, and classifying their lifestyles, it is convenient for targeted analysis of their perceptions of activity spaces based on different lifestyles.

3.2.2. Methods of Analyzing the Current Situation of Aging in Activity Spaces

  • Spatial Aging Satisfaction Assessment by Questionnaires
A qualitative analysis was conducted on the satisfaction of elderly people with aging adaptation through a questionnaire. Based on the activity trajectories of the elderly collected in Section 3.2.1, select locations with high usage intensity by the elderly and present the respondents with indicators related to satisfaction with aging housing and facilities in the village. The respondents rate each indicator on a scale of 1 to 5, reflecting the aging satisfaction index of the elderly in Jiashan Village towards these indicators (very aging: 5; relatively aging: 4; generally aging: 3; not very aging: 2; not aging: 1).
  • Spatial Aging Satisfaction Assessment by Facial Expression Recognition Method
The emotions of individuals in a given setting can reflect their level of satisfaction with the environment [56]. Facial expressions provide valuable insights into an individual’s inner state and are crucial for quantitatively measuring basic emotions [57]. Drawing from previous research [58,59], this study employs a combination of subjective questionnaires and facial expression recognition to comprehensively analyze the elderly residents of Jiashan Village’s satisfaction with the age-friendly environment.
During the experiment, participants were asked to watch five videos depicting daily village scenes and imagine themselves in the scene, reflecting on their emotions. Facial movements were recorded and analyzed using FaceReader™ 10.0 software, which provided emotional valence and arousal scores. The software is able to capture subtle facial expressions that users spontaneously generate and may disappear in a flash. Among representative facial recognition software systems, its emotion classification ability performs the best, even better than human coders [60]. In addition, the software can currently set the facial model to “EastAsian” to better analyze local facial features and reduce emotional expression biases caused by cultural differences.
  • Method for Assessing the Aging Condition of the Current Activity Space
The satisfaction scores derived from the questionnaire and the facial expression recognition method were superimposed to calculate the standardized scores of environmental satisfaction of elderly people. The specific operation is to map the proportion of positive emotions obtained from facial expression recognition to the scores in the age-friendly satisfaction questionnaire. For example, a proportion of 80–100% of positive emotions is considered as 5 points (very aging), which is added to the subjective score from the questionnaire and averaged to obtain the satisfaction level of the elderly with the age-friendly daily living environment.
SPSS Statistics 27 software was used to calculate the correlation between the standardized scores and the length of time spent using the space to explore the importance of public space modification. If the correlation analysis results in a positive correlation, it means that, with the increase in the length of time of using the space, the aging satisfaction score of the elderly for the space also increases; i.e., the elderly are more satisfied with this kind of space, and the degree of importance of the public space renovation is weaker; meanwhile, the results of the correlation resulting in a negative correlation indicate that the elderly are less satisfied with this kind of space, and the degree of importance of the public space renovation is stronger.

3.2.3. Simulation Methods for Decision-Making on Age-Friendly Adaptation of Activity Spaces

To evoke preferences for age-friendly retrofitting in suburban rural areas, we implemented a stated preference (SP) experiment with six attributes—two “activity” attributes (group activity frequency; life-check frequency) and four “environment” attributes (quality of production facilities, leisure facilities, medical facilities, and distance to daily services), as showed in Table 2. The attributes and three levels for each were derived from the literature on age-friendly environments and rural revitalization, a pre-survey and semi-structured interviews with local elderly residents, and local policy documents.
Given the full factorial size 36, we adopted the L27 (313) orthogonal array to construct statistically efficient profiles that ensure orthogonality of main effects. Twenty-seven orthogonal combinations were generated; to reduce respondent burden, one profile was removed while preserving near-balance across levels, yielding twenty-six scenarios. Each choice task presented respondents with two or three hypothetical retrofitting scenarios plus a baseline representing the current village conditions. Respondents were asked to select the most preferred option in each task. This design allows estimation of trade-offs across attributes while maintaining realism.
The questionnaire data were subjected to discrete choice analysis using the MNL model (multinomial logit model) to obtain the probabilistic relationship between satisfaction with the aging environment and various activities of the elderly, and to explore the effects of scenarios in order to improve the satisfaction with the aging environment of the elderly. The multinomial logit model formula is shown below:
V = β 1 χ 1 + β 2 χ 2 + β 3 χ 3 + + β 11 n o c h o i c e
where V stands for age-friendly environment satisfaction and denotes elemental utility, indicating different elements.

4. Results

4.1. Activity Space Needs of Elderly with Different Lifestyles Based on the New Time–Geography

The research team randomly selected 30 elders (15 male and 15 female) aged 55+. All the participants were informed about the purpose of the study (life situation, movement trajectory, and emotions), anonymity and data confidentiality, device security, and the right to withdraw at any time. After the notification was completed, the experimenter confirmed that the subjects fully understood the situation and agreed to participate in the experiment.
The classification of elderly lifestyles was derived from a combination of GPS trajectory data, questionnaire responses, and interview information. First, individual space–time paths were constructed from GPS tracking records to capture daily activity duration, travel distance, and spatial range. Second, the questionnaire items relating to daily routines, household responsibilities, and social participation were integrated to supplement the behavioral data. Third, the semi-structured interviews provided qualitative insights into the underlying motivations for activity choices. Based on these data, a clustering analysis was performed, and four representative lifestyle types were identified (Figure 7).
Summarizing the lifestyle and spatial–temporal behavioral characteristics of the four types of elderly individuals, they can be categorized as follows: the leisure-oriented type (1), the caregiving-oriented type (2), the agricultural-labor-oriented type (3), and the self-employment-oriented type (4). Specifically, the leisure-oriented type refers to elderly people whose all-day activities are mainly leisure activities, with less than 2 h of labor, such as farming and business; the caregiving-oriented type refers to elderly people whose all-day activities include childcare, transporting and accompanying children for more than 4 h; the agricultural-labor-oriented type refers to elderly people whose all-day activities are mainly farming activities, with more than 4 h of labor, such as ploughing and chopping wood; and the self-employment-oriented type refers to elderly people whose all-day activities mainly involve self-employment, with more than 6 h of labor, such as laboring or looking after a shop.
From the planning of the daily lives of the elderly in the four types of lifestyles, there are some differences in the types of activities and spaces, the magnitude of emotional fluctuations, and the richness of social interaction among the elderly (Table 3).
To complement the space–time path analysis, this study additionally employs a planar color-block representation to highlight the spatial distribution of behavioral events at different time periods within Jiashan Village (Figure 8). By mapping morning (6:00–9:00), midday (10:00–14:00), afternoon (15:00–18:00), and evening (19:00–22:00) activities onto the village plan, the visualization reveals clear spatial clustering of the user behaviors. For instance, the agricultural-labor-oriented seniors show concentrated activity blocks around the farmland and irrigation facilities in the morning, while the leisure-oriented seniors exhibit stronger clustering in the public plazas and riverside walkways during the afternoon. The caregiving-oriented elders are more active around homesteads and near children’s play areas, particularly in the evening, whereas the self-employment-oriented elders remain centered around the household–commercial nodes throughout the day.
Analyzing the activity needs of the four categories of elderly people on this basis, from the results of the analysis (Figure 9), the leisure-oriented seniors have the most urgent need and free time for social public spaces, including the chess and card rooms, small plazas, and river walks, which combine intergenerational interaction, children’s companionship, and emotional adjustment for seniors. The agricultural-labor-oriented type of elderly people have less free time, and their daily life revolves around their own land and farmland, with occasional recreational activities, such as shopping and card games. They have the most prominent demand for the refinement of the waterfront steps and farmland irrigation facilities. For the caregiving-oriented type of elderly people, the most important thing for them is to take care of their grandchildren, transport them to and from their farms, keep them company, and play games, and they have more time for recreation. Those elderly who are self-employed have the least amount of time for leisure and recreation and are mainly engaged in business activities every day, rarely using the recreational facilities in the village. Linear recreational spaces such as walking paths and waterfront trails play a significant role in restoring their emotions.

4.2. Satisfaction with and Reasons for Aging of Existing Activity Spaces

Processing the emotional scoring results, combined with the data of the spatial–temporal behaviors of the elderly, we obtain the emotional scores of the elderly with different lifestyles in daily life activities (Figure 10), and the comprehensive satisfaction scores, to understand the satisfaction of the elderly in different spaces and to conduct corresponding analyses (Figure 11 and Figure 12).
With regard to the outdoor environment, in terms of satisfaction with farmland and homesteads, more elderly people in the agricultural-labor-oriented category consider them to be “very suitable for the elderly”. With regard to parks, except for the caregiving-oriented type, where half of the respondents rated the parks as “more suitable for the elderly” or higher, the satisfaction level of the other three types of elderly people was generally on the lower side of average. With regard to the roads and bridges in the village, half of the elderly people with leisure-oriented and agricultural-labor-oriented lifestyles rated them as “quite suitable for the elderly” or “very suitable for the elderly,” and half of the elderly people with caregiving-oriented and self-employment-oriented lifestyles rated them as “moderately suitable for the elderly”. The largest number of elderly people in the caregiving-oriented and self-employment-oriented lifestyles said that they were “generally comfortable in old age”.
With regard to indoor environments, there are large differences in the evaluation of different indoor environments in relation to different types of lifestyles. Specifically, 50% of the leisure-oriented and caregiving-oriented seniors rated the chess rooms as “quite suitable for the elderly” and above, while very few of the agricultural-labor-oriented and self-employed-oriented seniors rated them as “very suitable for the elderly”, and half of them and more than half of them rated them as not suitable enough. More than half rated them as not old enough. Fewer of the four types of elderly people had a negative attitude towards the village activity center, and 60% of the self-employed elderly people rated the service center as “more suitable for the elderly” or above.
In order to further quantify the differences in satisfaction with the core activity spaces among the different elderly groups, this study integrates the standardized ratings of the above five types of spaces to obtain detailed results (Figure 13). It can be seen more intuitively that farmland has the highest level of satisfaction, but the satisfaction of the agricultural-labor-oriented type, who uses farmland the most, is the lowest among the four types of seniors; parks and board rooms have the lowest level of satisfaction, and the self-employed type, in particular, only rated the board rooms at 2.3. Overall, the aging-adaptability scores of the various types of spaces are relatively average, fluctuating around the standard line of the “Generally aging” threshold.
The results of the above analyses generally demonstrate the characteristics of different types of elderly people’s use of and satisfaction with activity spaces. In order to better elucidate the differences in choices between respondents and clarify the direction of age-friendly adaptation, this study analyzes the reasons for the results of the space satisfaction scores, taking into account the personal attributes of different types of elderly respondents.
Elderly people’s satisfaction with space is closely related to their companionship in daily life. Combining the spatial and temporal activity characteristics of the elderly to analyze the companionship of different types of elderly people’s lifestyles (Figure 14), it is evident that the activities of elderly people with leisure-oriented lifestyles are more varied, they have less time to be alone, and the comprehensive aging satisfaction evaluation results show that they have higher satisfaction with their lives. Except for the self-employed elderly, most of the elderly demonstrate good fits between the daily mood change line and the social intimacy line, forming an obvious positive correlation. The richness of the activity types and locations is related to mood: the mood of the self-employed elderly is relatively stable and calm throughout the day, which may be related to the high repetitiveness of the content and locations of their daily activities and the low sense of freshness, while the low mood in the evening may be related to the day’s exertion. The mood of the elderly is also related to the high level of satisfaction in their life when they engage in activities involving social recreation and entertainment. The elderly were generally in better moods when engaging in activities that included social recreation, with subsequent increases in satisfaction with the space.

4.3. Demand and Decision-Making Preferences for Age-Friendly Adaptation of Activity Spaces

Based on the satisfaction evaluation and cause analysis, the study further explores the mechanism and optimization path of age-friendly adaptation. The survey interviews show that the elderly in Jiashan Village have a strong and diversified willingness to undertake age-friendly adaptation of the spaces in the village, and, in order to better explore the specific aging retrofitting approaches, it is also necessary to analyze the actual spaces as well as the preferences of the elderly for retrofitting methods.
According to the results of the linear regression analysis (Figure 15), it can be seen that there is a strong negative correlation between the satisfaction scores and usage duration in the farmland/homesteads and parks, a strong positive correlation regarding the chess rooms, a significant negative correlation regarding the walking roads, and no correlation between the satisfaction scores and usage duration in the activity center.
Based on the results of the correlation analysis, it is clear that there is an urgent need for age-friendly improvements to the farmland/homesteads, parks, and walking roads for the elderly. Therefore, the study specifically analyzes typical existing spaces with potential for age-friendly renovation (Table 4) to understand the deficiencies and age-friendly demands of the existing spaces.
The research team distributed 207 paper questionnaires to the elderly in the village, and 152 valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective recovery rate of 73.4%. The questionnaire results were quantified via the SP method and MNL model to obtain the effects of different influencing elements on the satisfaction of the elderly environment of the community residents in Jiashan Village (Table 5). The analysis demonstrates that, among the four types of facility modifications, the quality improvement of production and business facilities is the most necessary for farmers, followed by leisure and recreation facilities; in terms of centralized activities, the effect of regular census on the living conditions and difficulties of the elderly is the most significant. Among all the influencing factors, the utility of fine-tuning farmland was significant, with an increase of 1.5873 compared to un-tuned farmland. For recreational facility renovation, the improvement of new facilities was greater than the utility associated with renovating the existing facilities, but both showed a significant effect.
In order to understand the needs of the elderly for age-friendly retrofitting, this study combines Maslow’s theory of needs with the analysis. Maslow’s theory of needs includes a five-level model of human needs, often depicted as a hierarchy within a pyramid. From the bottom of the hierarchy upwards, the needs are physiological, safety, social needs, respect, and self-actualization [61]. Among them, physiological needs and safety needs are lower-level needs, social needs and respect needs are higher-level needs, and self-actualization needs are the highest-level needs.
On this basis, Maslow’s theory of needs can be further divided into three dimensions: survival needs, belonging needs, and value needs. Survival needs, considered the most basic level of needs, are concerned with sustaining life and basic safety, and, for the elderly, this is reflected in the satisfaction of three meals a day, safe shelter, health protection, avoidance of risks in daily activities, and other basic survival security. After their basic survival needs are met, individuals seek emotional connection, social belonging, and recognition from others. Daily activities corresponding to the elderly include walking, chatting, and neighborhood interactions, which satisfy their needs for social interaction, emotional support, and a sense of group belonging. Finally, people’s need to grow beyond themselves, that is, the need for self-actualized values, is the highest level of need, pointing to the fulfillment of personal potential, the quest for a sense of meaning, and the realization of self-worth. For older people, this may be manifested in learning new things, engaging in creative activities, assuming specific social roles, or making sustained contributions to the family and community. Based on the above theoretical mapping and the analysis of the daily behavioral activities of the elderly in Jiashan Village, this study distills three progressive levels of their needs for aging adaptation: the need for native services, the need for social interaction, and the need for personal value (Figure 16). These three levels follow the order of satisfaction from low to high, which provides a solid theoretical foundation and value orientation for the subsequent identification of the differentiated needs of different elderly groups and the clarification of the priority direction of spatial aging adaptation.
Comparing the different types of elderly people in Jiashan Village (Figure 17), we can learn that the daily activities of the leisure-oriented elderly people and agricultural-labor-oriented elderly people mostly include the needs for native services and social interaction; the daily activities of the caregiving-oriented elderly people include the needs for native services, social interaction, and personal values; and the daily activities of the self-employed-oriented elderly people lack social interaction needs, and the system of needs is not complete and continuous.
According to Maslow’s theory of needs, the more needs that are satisfied from low to high, the higher and more positive the emotions of the elderly should be. According to the emotional analysis (Figure 10), the ranking of the time of emotional surge for different types of elderly people is as follows: caregiving-oriented type > leisure-oriented type > agricultural-labor-oriented type > self-employment-oriented type. It can be concluded that high-level needs have a greater positive emotional impact than low-level needs, such as social interaction needs having a greater emotional impact than native service needs. At the same time, the lack of certain needs in the daily life of the elderly can lead to a discontinuous demand system, which can also affect their emotions. For example, self-employed elderly people lack social interaction needs, and their emotions tend to be calm and low.
Through the hierarchy of needs analysis and satisfaction analysis, opinions guiding the practical application of age-friendly retrofitting were obtained, and the positioning of the age-friendly adaptation place for the elderly in Jiashan Village was finally determined (Figure 18).

5. Discussion

Based on the positioning of the renovation site, combined with the needs of the elderly, the method of spatial renovation as well as the system of creating a rural age-friendly community are proposed.

5.1. Combination of Multiple Methods to Prioritize Public Space Improvements

Based on five aspects—main activity space use demand, use experience, aging score satisfaction results, and SP-MNL model utility values—the transformation priority of the space is clarified, and the initial transformation direction is proposed in combination with the basic principles of space transformation (Figure 19) and the actual situation of Jiashan Village.
The “high demand–poor use experience–mediocre satisfaction” category of space needs to be prioritized for renovation, including farmland/homesteads and roads/bridges, which share the common characteristics of long use time, decreasing satisfaction with increasing use time, and mediocre overall satisfaction ratings. The spatial demand of the elderly for farmland is high, but satisfaction is strongly negatively correlated with length of use, especially the lowest satisfaction ratings of the agricultural-labor-oriented-type elderly, who have the strongest spatial demand for farmland. The SP model shows that the utility value of fine-tuning is the highest, so it is necessary to renovate the farmland first, and then it is possible to consider focusing on the improvement of the safety of the waterfront steps and the convenience of the irrigation facilities. As a space for the elderly to pass through and relax in daily life, the roads/bridges have potholes on the surface, and satisfaction is negatively correlated with length of use, so it is recommended to widen the road surface and add lighting and resting points.
The next area that needs to be optimized is the space of “general needs–poor experience–low satisfaction”, such as community parks. As the core needs of socialization for the leisure-oriented and caregiving-oriented elderly, the quality of the existing park facilities is average. Combined with the intention of the elderly in Jiashan Village to renovate the park, we can consider updating and adding to the existing facilities. It should be noted that, although park renovation is necessary, SP shows that its utility value is lower than that of the farmland, and the latter should be prioritized in terms of allocating potentially limited resources.
Activity spaces with “general needs–good utilization experience–low satisfaction” can be selectively renovated in light of the actual development of the village, such as the chess room. This type of space focuses on interaction with others, has low spatial requirements, and the satisfaction level is greatly affected by the socialization of different elderly people, so increasing the openness and inclusiveness of the space should be considered during the renovation.
For the villagers’ activity center, which has general demand, good experience, and relatively high satisfaction, the current status quo should be retained, and the supporting facilities should be improved moderately.
In addition, the economic feasibility of different retrofitting measures should be considered. Rural areas often face limited resources, making cost a key constraint. A preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that high-input measures such as new plaza construction may encounter financial barriers, whereas low-cost options such as transforming idle homesteads into public spaces could achieve higher benefit–cost ratios. Coupling transformation strategies with villagers’ willingness-to-pay surveys will further enhance the practicality and prioritization of interventions.
Special scenarios such as extreme weather and sudden health incidents should not be overlooked. For example, elderly residents face higher risks when traveling during storms, and the lack of emergency shelter space exacerbates safety concerns. Future transformation strategies should therefore incorporate scenario simulations and design elements such as rain shelters, shaded resting points, and emergency passages, enhancing the safety and resilience of suburban rural public spaces.

5.2. Spatial Adaptation Priorities for Seniors with Differentiated Lifestyles

Based on the needs hierarchy analysis of the elderly in Jiashan Village corresponding to Maslow’s needs theory, targeted strategies are proposed in combination with the behavioral characteristics of elderly individuals with different lifestyles.
For leisure-oriented seniors, the strategies aim to satisfy their needs for social interaction and personal value realization by adding a small plaza stage and outdoor seating areas to facilitate leisure and social activities, alongside introducing community vegetable plots to combine light horticultural work with emotional fulfillment.
For the caregiving-oriented elderly, whose existing needs are largely met, the emphasis lies in enhancing intergenerational interaction and children’s safety; this is achieved by embedding child-friendly play areas within existing plazas, installing guardrails along the riverfront walkway, and designing shared activity zones to encourage interaction between grandparents and grandchildren.
In the case of agricultural-labor-oriented seniors, the spatial improvements focus on ensuring safe agricultural production while promoting informal social contact through upgrading the farmland facilities, such as irrigation and waterfront access, complemented by the provision of resting areas with stone benches near farmland to support both productive work and casual social exchange.
For self-employment-oriented seniors, the core needs for convenient services and opportunities for incidental socialization are addressed by deploying small kiosks along frequently used commercial and residential paths, thereby meeting daily service demands while creating opportunities for “bypass socialization”.
By analyzing the needs of the elderly and the current situation of Jiashan Village, a specific schematic diagram of the spatial renovation (Figure 20) was created to meet the diversified needs of the elderly and provide quality living services. They also reflect the hierarchy of needs framework: farmland renovation addresses basic survival and safety needs, plazas and courts fulfill social belonging, while community pavilions and horticultural gardens provide opportunities for self-actualization and value expression.
Moreover, intra-group heterogeneity deserves further exploration. For instance, the observed “lack of social needs” among self-employment-oriented seniors may stem from work intensity, time constraints, or accessibility barriers, while agricultural-labor-oriented seniors may exhibit differentiated farmland facility demands depending on their age and health status. To deepen this understanding, future studies can supplement in-depth interviews and construct a “behavior–demand–space” correlation matrix, thereby providing a more detailed evidence base for precise adaptation strategies.

5.3. Optimizing Age-Friendly Services: Embedding Support Within the Spatial Framework

In order to comprehensively respond to the multifaceted and complex needs of different elderly groups while improving spatial carriers, it is necessary to embed age-friendly services into the daily life scenarios of the elderly through institutional design and multi-party collaboration (Figure 21).
Firstly, a demand-oriented approach should be adopted to promote the coupling of supply and demand, providing diversified and high-quality age-friendly services. In response to the physical and mental characteristics and practical needs of rural elderly groups, priority should be given to addressing common high-frequency service demands, with a focus on strengthening the supply of urgently needed services, such as preventive healthcare, cultural education, leisure and recreation, and intergenerational educational support.
At the same time, it is essential to fully accommodate the differentiated needs of various elderly groups in terms of physical capacity, time availability, and social participation so as to achieve precise matching between service provision and individual characteristics. For example, for time-constrained self-employment-oriented and agricultural-labor-oriented elderly individuals, flexible and convenient services such as in-home health monitoring, mobile maintenance, and delivery of daily necessities should be developed. For leisure-oriented and caregiving-oriented elderly individuals, a variety of social and recreational activities, lifelong learning resources, and temporary childcare support should be provided, thereby comprehensively enhancing the targeting and coverage of services.
On this basis, a dynamic management mechanism should be established to regulate supply based on demand and drive optimization through evaluation and feedback. Village committees can take the lead in creating an elderly population information database, combined with regular household visits, to grasp and predict the potential needs of the elderly in real time. Meanwhile, it is necessary to establish sound service feedback channels, extensively collect evaluations from the elderly on service content and quality, closely monitor changes in their physical and mental states, and build a closed-loop management system of “demand identification–service provision–feedback optimization” to continuously improve service responsiveness and satisfaction among the elderly population.
Secondly, establishing a multi-agent collaborative governance mechanism is essential for implementing age-friendly services in rural areas. As illustrated in Figure 22, this mechanism integrates four core stakeholders: government agencies (service supporters), village committees (service regulators), villagers and migrant workers (service providers), and older rural residents (service beneficiaries). By aligning the interests and responsibilities of these diverse actors, the framework aims to transcend fragmented supply-driven approaches and foster a coordinated sustainable system for aging services.
Government agencies provide financial subsidies, policy guidance, and infrastructure investments while overseeing implementation, allocating resources, and facilitating the scaling of effective practices. Village committees serve as regulatory and coordinating bodies, responsible for assessing service demands, applying for policy support, and mediating divergent interests among older adults with varying needs—such as tensions between healthcare and recreational services. Villagers and migrant workers act as direct service providers, offering daily assistance, volunteer support, or semi-professional care. Their involvement not only addresses service shortages but also strengthens community cohesion. Older rural groups, as end-users, articulate needs and evaluate services, ensuring that adaptation strategies align with their lived realities rather than top-down decisions.
This collaborative model clarifies the nexus of actors, responsibilities, and resources, offering a replicable pathway for multi-stakeholder cooperation. It underscores that effective rural aging services rely not only on government support but also on co-production through structured collaboration, interest negotiation, and iterative learning—achieving a synergistic “win–win” scenario that enhances both service efficacy and community agency.
Finally, it is essential to strengthen talent introduction and training to improve the management system for elderly care services (Figure 23). In light of rural realities, efforts should focus on introducing professional elderly care talent, enhancing grassroots service capabilities, and ensuring service sustainability through institutional guarantees. Specifically, it is necessary to actively recruit elderly care professionals with relevant expertise, develop a systematic training system, promote continuing education and regular on-the-job training for practitioners, and improve the quality of frontline services. At the same time, government guidance and support should be strengthened by formulating specific policies and regulations, establishing supervision and assessment mechanisms, and increasing publicity efforts around age-friendly concepts and policies. This will ensure the standardized operation and resource integration of the elderly care service system at an institutional level.

6. Conclusions

This study analyzes the spatial–temporal characteristics and influencing factors of the daily activities of older adults in the village of Jiashan through the new time–geography model. By extending the categorization of needs to the composite dimensions of behavioral patterns and affective experiences, it provides a theoretical tool for understanding and guiding age-friendly adaptation in a specific geographic unit of a suburban village. The integration of Maslow’s hierarchy with the new time–geography advances a three-tiered framework that links behavioral dynamics to spatial satisfaction, providing a nuanced perspective for precise age-friendly adaptation.
The study successfully identified four distinct lifestyles of older adults in Jiashan Village, each of which differed significantly in terms of spatial activity needs, social intensity, and emotional characteristics. This empirically validates the theoretical proposition that demographic attributes alone are insufficient to understand the complexity of rural older adults’ needs. The strong correlation between frequency of facility use and increased satisfaction, particularly through interventions such as farmland improvements and new plazas, is consistent with a core tenet of Maslow’s theory that meeting basic physiological and safety needs is a prerequisite for higher-level social and esteem needs. The proposed collaborative, multi-level, multi-objective retrofitting strategy directly addresses the identified mismatch between the top-down supply model and the comprehensive needs of rural older adults, moving in the direction of more responsive needs. The findings support the utility of the new time–geography model in capturing the dynamic spatial–temporal constraints and organizational interactions within rural older adults’ “daily life circles,” revealing how activity richness and social companionship are key drivers of spatial satisfaction and emotional well-being.
Compared with existing domestic and international studies, this research further highlights the differentiated age-friendly needs of suburban rural areas. Unlike the WHO’s “age-friendly community” standards, which are primarily city-oriented, suburban villages also rely on production spaces such as farmland, reflecting a distinctive dependence not fully addressed in urban frameworks. Similarly, domestic urban transformation experiences emphasize service accessibility and public facilities but less so agricultural production and intergenerational caregiving, which are prevalent in rural contexts. Therefore, this study supplements and revises existing theories by emphasizing the coexistence of production–living–social spaces in suburban villages, demonstrating its theoretical contribution to the broader discourse on age-friendly environments.
While this study provides valuable insights, there are several limitations that warrant careful consideration when interpreting the results and planning future applications.
First, in terms of sample scope and representativeness, this study focuses on Jiashan Village in Wuhan, a suburban village with relatively favorable economic conditions and development prospects as a future urban sprawl area. Although these findings were selected for their typicality in terms of their peri-urban characteristics and lifestyle diversity, they may not be fully generalizable to suburban villages in areas with significantly different economic structures, cultural backgrounds, or levels of urbanization. The sample size (30 GPS follow-ups and 152 valid SP questionnaires) was sufficient for case study exploration but limits robust statistical generalization to a wider population. Therefore, the specific lifestyle categorizations, prioritization of spatial needs, and utility values derived from the SP-MNL model should be interpreted as specific to the context of Jiashan Village or similar economically advantaged suburban environments. Direct application of these findings to remote or impoverished villages requires caution and adaptation. Furthermore, to clarify the applicable boundaries of the conclusions, future research should adopt a stratified sampling approach to include suburban villages with different economic levels and degrees of urbanization. Comparative analyses with remote or underdeveloped suburban villages can further test the universality of the lifestyle typologies identified in this study. In addition, expanding the sample size—especially by including special elderly groups such as those living alone and the advanced aged—would enhance statistical robustness and avoid potential representativeness bias.
Second, recognition performance may vary across demographics, especially among elderly individuals, due to facial morphology, wrinkles, and the generally reserved nature of emotional expression in this group. To enhance applicability in the rural elderly context, several measures were incorporated into the experimental design. First, all the data collection was conducted under evenly distributed indoor lighting, with the participants positioned frontally, minimizing occlusion and ensuring stable recording quality. Second, a pilot test involving 10 elderly participants from the study community was carried out to verify recognition stability under real conditions and to adjust camera distance, lighting, and task pacing. Third, stimulus tasks were designed to allow sufficient time for expression considering the slower dynamics of elderly facial responses, and short breaks were introduced to maintain attention. Fourth, the emotion recognition outcomes were cross-validated with participants’ self-reported evaluations from questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, which helped to reduce potential bias associated with cultural differences in emotional expression. Finally, data quality indicators provided by the software were used to filter out recordings affected by poor responsiveness or environmental interference, such as glare and shadow. Through this combination of optimized recording conditions, pre-experimental validation, task design, cross-verification, and strict quality control, the study ensured that the facial expression recognition results reliably reflected the emotional states of rural elderly participants while minimizing potential biases introduced by cultural and demographic factors.
Finally, this study provides cross-sectional analyses, but the long-term effectiveness of the proposed renovation strategies remains to be validated. Future research will benefit from a tracking design with 6-month and 1-year follow-up evaluations, covering indicators such as space usage rate, satisfaction change, and emotional state fluctuation. Such longitudinal tracking will enable assessing the sustainability of the transformation measures. In parallel, a demographic simulation should be incorporated to forecast future spatial demand and enhance the forward-looking value of strategy formulation.
Recognizing the limitations, future research should focus on expanding the study to suburban villages at different economic levels and geographic regions to validate and refine the lifestyle typology and needs framework, identifying universal principles and context-specific adaptations. Additionally, methodological refinements should focus on exploring complementary or alternative methods to enhance emotion measurement and behavioral tracking and investigate the cultural specificity of emotional expression in rural elderly populations. By recognizing these limitations and pursuing these future directions, the field can move towards more robust, adaptive, and sustainable strategies for creating truly age-friendly environments in the diverse and evolving landscapes of rural and peri-urban areas in developing countries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.Z., C.W. and Y.C.; methodology, Y.C.; software, R.Z.; validation, C.W., Y.C. and R.L.; formal analysis, C.W. and Y.C.; investigation, C.W. and R.Z.; resources, R.L.; data curation, R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C.; writing—review and editing, C.W.; visualization, R.Z., C.W. and Y.C.; supervision, R.L.; project administration, R.L.; funding acquisition, R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number: 52178054].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Wuhan University (protocol code WHU-NS-IRB2025004, approval date 17 August 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Verbal informed consent was obtained from the participants. Verbal consent was used rather than written consent because all participants were elderly individuals with limited literacy, making the recognition and writing of text difficult. This approach better aligned with local communication practices and ensured their right to be informed was not hindered by procedural barriers. Furthermore, as the study collected no personally identifiable information and primarily employed brief questionnaires and short interviews, verbal consent reduced participants’ psychological burden and simplified the process.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Feng, Q.; Yeung, W.J.J.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, Y. Age of retirement and human capital in an aging China, 2015–2050. Eur. J. Popul. 2019, 35, 29–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. Global Strategy and Action Plan on Ageing and Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lu, H.W.; Luo, Q.Y.; Gao, M.J. Analysis of spatial and temporal changes in the aging of China’s rural population and its causes. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Reg. Plan. 2024, 45, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
  4. Leaving No One Behind In An Ageing World. 2023. Available online: https://social.desa.un.org/publications/2023-leaving-no-one-behind-in-an-ageing-world (accessed on 1 September 2025).
  5. Torku, A.; Chan, A.P.C.; Yung, E.H.K.; Seo, J. The influence of urban visuospatial configuration on older adults’ stress: A wearable physiological-perceived stress sensing and data mining based-approach. Build. Environ. 2021, 206, 108298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. World Health Organization. The Global Network for Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: Looking Back over the Last Decade, Looking Forward to the Next; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rantanen, T. Promoting mobility in older people. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2013, 46, S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Du, P.; Sun, J.J.; Zhang, W.J.; Wang, X. The Demands of Old-age Care and the Family and Social Resources for the Chinese Elderly:A Study Based on 2014 China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey. Popul. Res. 2016, 40, 49–61. [Google Scholar]
  9. National Aging Development Bulletin. 2024. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202507/content_7033724.htm (accessed on 1 September 2025).
  10. Xiang, X.; Wang, Y. Current situation, characteristics, causes and countermeasures of population ageing in China. Chin. J. Gerontol. 2021, 41, 4149–4152. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, Y.H.; Yan, J.Y.; Liu, Y.S. The cognition and path analysis of rural revitalization theory based on rural resilience. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2019, 74, 2001–2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tong, Y.F. Research on the Latest Dynamics and Trends of Population in China—An Analysis Combined with the Seventh National Census Data. J. China Univ. Labor Relat. 2021, 35, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yan, S.X.; Dong, H.P.; Huang, S.L.; Han, Y. New Urbanization and Urban Planning. Urban Plan. Forum 2013, 5, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  14. Du, P.; An, R.X. Mutual-aid Aged Care from the Perspective of Governmental Governance and Villager Autonomy in Rural China. J. China Agric. Univ. (Soc. Sci.) 2019, 36, 50–57. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xinhua News, Opinions of the Central Committee and State Council of the Communist Party of China on the Implementation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy. Gaz. State Counc. People’s Repub. China 2018, 5, 4–16.
  16. Liu, Y.; Zhong, F.; Liu, X. Research on the Design of Rural Age-appropriate Renovation Services: Taking Xinlong Village Pilot as an Example. Art Des. 2024, 4, 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jia, R.X.; Liu, Y. Exploring on Chinese periurban problems. Urban Dev. Stud. 2002, 2, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, X.W. Research on the Integration Pattern of Industry and Space in Suburban Village of North Zhejiang. Ph.D. Thesis, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cao, Z.; Li, Y.R.; Chen, Y.F. Approaches to rural transformation and sustainable development in the context of urban-rural integration. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2019, 74, 2560–2571. [Google Scholar]
  20. Scott, M. Planning for age-friendly cities: Edited by Mark scott. Plan. Theory Pract. 2021, 22, 457–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, X.H.; Liu, J. Planning Approaches for Public Facilities for the Elderly Indeveloped Areas: A Case Study on Kunshan City. City Plan. Rev. 2013, 37, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  22. Carr, P.J.; Kefalas, M.J. Hollowing out the Middle: The Rural Brain Drain and What it Means for America; Beacon Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xiaoyan, H.; Wei, C. World population ageing: Trends and patterns. Popul. Res. 1999, 23, 54–59. [Google Scholar]
  24. World Health Organization. Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  25. Carstens, D.Y. Site Planning and Design for the Elderly: Issues, Guidelines, and Alternatives; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cao, B. Rural Revitalization Practices in Japan: The Background, Actions and Implications. Chin. Rural Econ. 2018, 8, 117–129. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou, Y.M.; Liu, J.Y. Outdoor Environment Design for the Aged in Residential Area. Archit. J. 2013, 3, 60–64. [Google Scholar]
  28. Roth, E.G.; Keimig, L.; Rubinstein, R.L.; Morgan, L.; Eckert, J.K.; Goldman, S.; Peeples, A.D. Baby boomers in an active adult retirement community: Comity interrupted. Gerontol. 2012, 52, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, K.L.; Castillo, R.J. The US long term care system: Development and expansion of naturally occurring retirement communities as an innovative model for aging in place. Ageing Int. 2012, 37, 210–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marques, B.; McIntosh, J.; Valera, A.; Gaddam, A. Innovative and assistive ehealth technologies for smart therapeutic and rehabilitation outdoor spaces for the elderly demographic. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2020, 4, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peng, X.; Hu, Z. The Population Aging in China from the Perspective of Public Policy. Chin. Soc. Sci. 2011, 3, 21–22. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Y.; Li, J.; Zeng, P. The Implementation Path of Community Renewal Based on the Age—Friendly Community Support System. Mod. Urban Res. 2022, 1, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, L.; Xie, B.; Wang, S. The Planning Framework and Strategies of Age—Friendly Communities from the Perspective of New Time Geography. Plan. Rev. 2024, 40, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
  34. Scharlach, A.E.; Davitt, J.K.; Lehning, A.J.; Greenfield, E.A.; Graham, C.L. Does the village model help to foster age-friendly communities? J. Aging Soc. Policy 2014, 26, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dokl, D.; Rogelj, V.; Bogataj, D. Smart age-friendly villages: Literature review and research agenda. IFAC-Pap. 2022, 55, 928–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cai, Y.; Li, C. The Spatial Characteristics of Urban Elderly Daily Shopping Behavior in China—A Case Study of Beijing, Shenzhen and Shanghai. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2005, 3, 401–408. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cai, Y.; Tan, Y.; Shen, Y.; Kwok, P.M. The Basic Ideas for Constructing the Theory of Space—Behavior Interaction. Geogr. Res. 2017, 36, 1959–1970. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhou, L.Q.; Zhou, T.T.; Wang, L.; Wang, B. Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Matching Relationship between the Elderly Population and Facilities for the Elderly: A Case Study of Guangzhou. Trop. Geogr. 2023, 43, 1777–1786. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lai, H.; Lau, S.S.Y.; Su, Y.; Sun, C.-Y. Aging-in-Place Attachment Among Older Adults in Macau’s High-Density Community Spaces: A Multi-Dimensional Empirical Study. World 2025, 6, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ren, Z.Q.; Tang, X.S.; Sun, M.J.; Wang, X.H. Research on the Positive Emotions of Outdoor Elderly in Urban Communities under Spatiotemporal Behavior. Urban Build. 2023, 20, 141–144. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, Y.; Chai, Y. The Development of Time Geography Focusing on Project-Activity System Research. Prog. Geogr. 2022, 41, 53–63. [Google Scholar]
  42. Xie, B.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Z.; An, Z. The Planning Layout Mode of Outdoor Space for Urban old people from the Perspective of Behavior and Activities: A Case Study of Wuhan. Mod. Urban Res. 2019, 2019, 30–37. [Google Scholar]
  43. Goebel, B.L.; Brown, D.R. Age differences in motivation related to Maslow’s need hierarchy. Dev. Psychol. 1981, 17, 809. [Google Scholar]
  44. Thielke, S.; Harniss, M.; Thompson, H.; Patel, S.; Demiris, G.; Johnson, K. Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs and the adoption of health-related technologies for older adults. Ageing Int. 2012, 37, 470–488. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Lyu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, D.; Wei, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, M. Public perception and preferences of industrial green infrastructure in Northwest China. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 156, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cai, Y.; Shen, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhao, Y. The collection and management of space-time data of individual behavior based on location-based technologies: A case study of activity-travel survey in Beijing. Geogr. Res. 2013, 32, 441–451. [Google Scholar]
  47. Cai, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y. A new time-geography research framework of community life circle. Prog. Geogr. 2020, 39, 1961–1971. [Google Scholar]
  48. Neutens, T.; Schwanen, T.; Witlox, F. The Prism of Everyday Life: Towards a New Research Agenda for Time Geography. Transp. Rev. 2010, 31, 25–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hägerstrand, T. What about people in regional science? Pap. Reg. Sci. 1970, 24, 6–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Miller, H.J. A Measurement Theory for Time Geography. Geogr. Anal. 2005, 37, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kraak, M.-J.; Koussoulakou, A. A Visualization Environment for the Space-Time-Cube. In Developments in Spatial Data Handling; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ellegård, K.; Palm, J. Who is behaving? Consequences for energy policy of concept confusion. Energies 2015, 8, 7618–7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, Y.; Chai, Y. “New” Time-Geography: A Review of Recent Progresses of Time-geographical Researches from Kajsa Ellegård in Sweden. Hum. Geogr. 2016, 5, 19–24+46. [Google Scholar]
  54. Hellgren, M. Extracting more knowledge from time diaries. Soc. Indic. Res. 2014, 119, 1517–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, J.; Shaw, S.-L.; Yu, H.; Lu, F.; Chai, Y.; Jia, Q. Exploratory data analysis of activity diary data: A space–time GIS approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 2011, 19, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Donato, G.; Bartlett, M.S.; Hager, J.C.; Ekman, P.; Sejnowski, T.J. Classifying Facial Actions. IEEE Trans. PAMI 1999, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bedon, C.; Mattei, S. Facial Expression-Based Experimental Analysis of Human Reactions and Psychological Comfort on Glass Structures in Buildings. Buildings 2021, 11, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, G.; Hu, P.; Zhong, H.; Yang, Y.; Sun, J.; Ji, Y.; Zou, J.; Zhu, H.; Hu, S. Effects of the Acoustic-Visual Indoor Environment on Relieving Mental Stress Based on Facial Electromyography and Micro-Expression Recognition. Buildings 2024, 14, 3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nubani, L.; Öztürk, A. Measuring the Impact of Museum Architecture, Spaces and Exhibits on Virtual Visitors Using Facial Expression Analysis Software. Buildings 2021, 11, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Küntzler, T.; Höfling, T.T.A.; Alpers, G.W. Automatic Facial Expression Recognition in Standardized and Non-standardized Emotional Expressions. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 627561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Maslow, A.H. A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 1943, 50, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location analysis of Jiashan Village.
Figure 1. Location analysis of Jiashan Village.
Buildings 15 03361 g001
Figure 2. Basic information about the respondents.
Figure 2. Basic information about the respondents.
Buildings 15 03361 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of current main activity spaces.
Figure 3. Distribution of current main activity spaces.
Buildings 15 03361 g003
Figure 4. Technical line of research on age-friendly adaptation of rural spaces based on new time–geography.
Figure 4. Technical line of research on age-friendly adaptation of rural spaces based on new time–geography.
Buildings 15 03361 g004
Figure 5. The steps of collecting basic spatial–temporal behavior data.
Figure 5. The steps of collecting basic spatial–temporal behavior data.
Buildings 15 03361 g005
Figure 6. The concepts of space–time path (adapted from Jie Chen et al., 2009 [55]).
Figure 6. The concepts of space–time path (adapted from Jie Chen et al., 2009 [55]).
Buildings 15 03361 g006
Figure 7. Characteristics of spatial and temporal distribution of the activities of the elderly in Jiashan Village.
Figure 7. Characteristics of spatial and temporal distribution of the activities of the elderly in Jiashan Village.
Buildings 15 03361 g007
Figure 8. Temporal patterns of spatial behavior for the elderly.
Figure 8. Temporal patterns of spatial behavior for the elderly.
Buildings 15 03361 g008
Figure 9. Intensity of demand by elderly people with different lifestyles.
Figure 9. Intensity of demand by elderly people with different lifestyles.
Buildings 15 03361 g009
Figure 10. Results of the evaluation of the satisfaction of older people with different lifestyles with aging in different activity environments.
Figure 10. Results of the evaluation of the satisfaction of older people with different lifestyles with aging in different activity environments.
Buildings 15 03361 g010
Figure 11. Standardized satisfaction scores for aging in outdoor environments.
Figure 11. Standardized satisfaction scores for aging in outdoor environments.
Buildings 15 03361 g011
Figure 12. Standardized satisfaction scores for aging in indoor environments.
Figure 12. Standardized satisfaction scores for aging in indoor environments.
Buildings 15 03361 g012
Figure 13. Satisfaction scores for aging of existing activity spaces.
Figure 13. Satisfaction scores for aging of existing activity spaces.
Buildings 15 03361 g013
Figure 14. Accompaniment of different types of elderly people in Jiashan Village.
Figure 14. Accompaniment of different types of elderly people in Jiashan Village.
Buildings 15 03361 g014
Figure 15. Score-duration of use correlation analysis.
Figure 15. Score-duration of use correlation analysis.
Buildings 15 03361 g015
Figure 16. The daily routine of the elderly corresponds to Maslow’s theory of needs.
Figure 16. The daily routine of the elderly corresponds to Maslow’s theory of needs.
Buildings 15 03361 g016
Figure 17. Analysis of the differences in the needs of different types of elderly people for rehabilitation.
Figure 17. Analysis of the differences in the needs of different types of elderly people for rehabilitation.
Buildings 15 03361 g017
Figure 18. The process of locating the age-friendly places.
Figure 18. The process of locating the age-friendly places.
Buildings 15 03361 g018
Figure 19. Basic principles of retrofitting age-friendly spaces.
Figure 19. Basic principles of retrofitting age-friendly spaces.
Buildings 15 03361 g019
Figure 20. Schematic diagram of the retrofitting of age-friendly spaces.
Figure 20. Schematic diagram of the retrofitting of age-friendly spaces.
Buildings 15 03361 g020
Figure 21. Adaptive service delivery framework.
Figure 21. Adaptive service delivery framework.
Buildings 15 03361 g021
Figure 22. Synergistic paths of multiple subjects in aging services.
Figure 22. Synergistic paths of multiple subjects in aging services.
Buildings 15 03361 g022
Figure 23. Elderly service management system construction.
Figure 23. Elderly service management system construction.
Buildings 15 03361 g023
Table 1. Classification of activity spaces.
Table 1. Classification of activity spaces.
By Physical Location of Spaces
By Attributed Nature of Spaces
Public SpacePrivate Space
Indoor spaceVillagers’ Activity Center
Chess Room
Commissary
Collection point
Health Center
Home (residential/commercial)
Friend’s home
Neighbors’ homes
Outdoor spaceRoads
Parks
Marketplace
River walks
Farmland
Privately farmed plots of cropland
Gardens
Table 2. Elements of the stated preference experiment.
Table 2. Elements of the stated preference experiment.
Type of ElementInfluencing ElementLevel 1Level 2Level 3
ActivitiesOrganize activities for the elderly in the villageEvery weekEvery two weeksEvery month
Periodic surveys of the living conditions and difficulties of older personsMonthlyQuarterlySemi-annual
EnvironmentQuality of medical and health facilitiesCommunity health clinicsMedical clinic in the countrysideStatus quo pharmacy
Distance to living servicesCloseCenteringFar
Quality of production and operation facilitiesFine-tuned farmlandSlightly modified farmlandUnimproved farmland
Quality of leisure and recreation facilitiesMany new facilitiesModification of existing facilitiesPreserve the status quo
Table 3. Characteristics of the lifestyles of the elderly in Jiashan Village.
Table 3. Characteristics of the lifestyles of the elderly in Jiashan Village.
LifestyleActivity Type and SpaceMood SwingsMagnitude Social Richness
Leisure-orientedRich in recreational activities such as walks, chess, and cards, in addition to survival activitiesMoods fluctuate, but most of the time they are calm or happySocially rich; average daily alone time less than 2 h
Agricultural-labor-orientedMore abundant, except for neighborhood social and recreational activities such as chess and cards; the rest of the social outings are mostly with childrenHigher emotions most of the timeSocially rich; average daily alone time less than 1 h
Caregiving-orientedMore homogenous, focusing on farmland, homesteads, and family living spaces, etc.Average mood swings, calm most of the timeSocially rich; average daily alone time less than 1 h
Self-employment-orientedSingle, mostly focused on living space in the home and commercial selling spaceLow mood swings, calm most of the time, low at nightSocializing is more limited, mostly with friends and neighbors and guests.
Table 4. Current situation of typical spaces in Jiashan Village and needs for aging adaptation.
Table 4. Current situation of typical spaces in Jiashan Village and needs for aging adaptation.
Current Spatial TypesDescription of the Current SpaceDemand for Aging Adaptation
Buildings 15 03361 i001
Walking path
Walking paths within the village lack open space on both sides and have cluttered landscaping on both sidesLeisure-oriented seniors in the village need a marketplace or supermarket for shopping and socializing.
Buildings 15 03361 i002
Village park
Lack of sitting facilities such as tables and chairs, and no space for socializationThe elderly people in the village would like to have a small square in the village where they can take a walk. They want a beautiful and orderly environment
Buildings 15 03361 i003
Farmland waterfront steps
Lack of stairs and ramps to farmland, inconvenience for elderly people to fetch water for farmingThe village elders have a village square where villagers can gather and celebrate festivals
Buildings 15 03361 i004
Riverside walkway platform
Riverwalk has potholes and pipes, making it difficult and dangerous for seniors to walkThe caregiving-oriented seniors in the village wanted a children’s playground where they could let their children play
Table 5. Influence of different elements on the satisfaction of the elderly environment of the community residents in Jiashan Village.
Table 5. Influence of different elements on the satisfaction of the elderly environment of the community residents in Jiashan Village.
Influencing FactorsElement LevelParameter ValueSignificanceSignificance Level 1
Organize activities for the elderly in the village/0.195870.0000***
Periodic surveys of the living conditions and difficulties of older persons/0.259650.0000***
Quality of production and operation facilitiesFine-tuned farmland1.58730.0000***
Slightly modified farmland0.63210.0000***
Unimproved farmland0//
Quality of leisure and recreation facilitiesMany new facilities0.28090.0000***
Modification of existing facilities0.23680.0000***
preserve the status quo0//
Quality of medical and health facilitiesCommunity health clinics0.13770.1207/
Medical clinic in the countryside0.04010.0400**
Status quo pharmacy0//
Distance to living servicesClose0.18030.0000*
Centering0.15030.0703/
Far0//
Neither0.85590.0000***
Log-likelihood−1739.4
Number of selections1976
1 ***: p < 0.01; **: p < 0.05; *: p < 0.1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Zhou, R.; Wang, C.; Li, R. Research on Behavioral Characteristics of the Elderly in Suburban Villages and Strategies for Age-Friendly Adaptation of Building Spaces Based on New Time–Geography. Buildings 2025, 15, 3361. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183361

AMA Style

Chen Y, Zhou R, Wang C, Li R. Research on Behavioral Characteristics of the Elderly in Suburban Villages and Strategies for Age-Friendly Adaptation of Building Spaces Based on New Time–Geography. Buildings. 2025; 15(18):3361. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ying, Ruibin Zhou, Chenshuo Wang, and Rui Li. 2025. "Research on Behavioral Characteristics of the Elderly in Suburban Villages and Strategies for Age-Friendly Adaptation of Building Spaces Based on New Time–Geography" Buildings 15, no. 18: 3361. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183361

APA Style

Chen, Y., Zhou, R., Wang, C., & Li, R. (2025). Research on Behavioral Characteristics of the Elderly in Suburban Villages and Strategies for Age-Friendly Adaptation of Building Spaces Based on New Time–Geography. Buildings, 15(18), 3361. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183361

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop