Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Phase Change Materials Incorporation into Construction Commodities for Sustainable and Energy-Efficient Building Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Performance of High-RAP-Content Asphalt Mixture: A Case Study in Jianghe Expressway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Classifying Metro Station Areas for Urban Regeneration: An RFM Model Approach and Differentiated Strategies in Beijing

1
School of Architecture & Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2
Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
3
Beijing Key Laboratory of Green Built Environment and Energy Efficient Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
4
Beijing Beichen Industrial Co., Ltd., China National Conference Center, Beijing 100105, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(17), 3108; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173108
Submission received: 3 August 2025 / Revised: 26 August 2025 / Accepted: 27 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate)

Abstract

Amid growing demands for urban regeneration, metro station areas (MSAs) have emerged as critical spatial units for assessing renewal potential. However, their highly heterogeneous functional and spatial attributes pose challenges to precise classification and targeted strategy development. This study introduces the RFM (recency, frequency, and monetary) model—originally used in marketing—to the urban renewal domain. By mapping POI (point of interest) data, population density, and land price to the RFM dimensions, a three-dimensional evaluation framework is constructed. Using QGIS to process multi-source data for 118 MSAs in Beijing, we apply an improved five-quantile stratification method to classify station areas into eight renewal potential types. The results reveal a concentric spatial gradient: 24% of core-area MSAs are identified as Key-Value MSAs, while 23% of peripheral MSAs are categorized as General-Retention MSAs. Based on the classification, differentiated renewal strategies are proposed: high-potential MSAs should prioritize public space enhancement and walkability improvements, whereas low-potential MSAs should focus on upgrading basic transit infrastructure. The study provides a replicable method for classifying MSAs based on spatial and economic indicators, offering new theoretical insights and practical tools to guide evidence-based urban regeneration and station–city integration in high-density metropolitan areas such as Beijing.
Keywords: metro station areas; urban regeneration; RFM model; renewal potential classification; differentiated planning strategies metro station areas; urban regeneration; RFM model; renewal potential classification; differentiated planning strategies

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Ma, W.; Zhang, N. Classifying Metro Station Areas for Urban Regeneration: An RFM Model Approach and Differentiated Strategies in Beijing. Buildings 2025, 15, 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173108

AMA Style

Li X, Li Y, Wang H, Ma W, Zhang N. Classifying Metro Station Areas for Urban Regeneration: An RFM Model Approach and Differentiated Strategies in Beijing. Buildings. 2025; 15(17):3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiangyu, Yinzhen Li, Hongyan Wang, Wenxuan Ma, and Nan Zhang. 2025. "Classifying Metro Station Areas for Urban Regeneration: An RFM Model Approach and Differentiated Strategies in Beijing" Buildings 15, no. 17: 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173108

APA Style

Li, X., Li, Y., Wang, H., Ma, W., & Zhang, N. (2025). Classifying Metro Station Areas for Urban Regeneration: An RFM Model Approach and Differentiated Strategies in Beijing. Buildings, 15(17), 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173108

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop