Next Article in Journal
Computational Design and Optimization of Discrete Shell Structures Made of Equivalent Members
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Study on Unit Plans of Public Rental Housing in China, Japan, and South Korea: Policy, Culture, and Spatial Insights for China’s Indemnificatory Housing Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Teaching with Artificial Intelligence in Architecture: Embedding Technical Skills and Ethical Reflection in a Core Design Studio

1
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2
The Architectural Design & Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310028, China
3
Zhejiang University Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
4
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(17), 3069; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173069
Submission received: 25 July 2025 / Revised: 13 August 2025 / Accepted: 20 August 2025 / Published: 27 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Topic Architectural Education)

Abstract

This case study examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into undergraduate architectural education through a 2024–25 core studio teaching experiment at Zhejiang University. A dual-module framework was implemented, comprising a 20 h AI skills training module and in-class ethics discussions, without altering the existing studio structure. The AI skills module introduced deep learning models, LLMs, AIGC image models, LoRA fine-tuning, and ComfyUI, supported by a dedicated technical instructor. Student feedback indicated phase-dependent and tool-sensitive engagement, and students expressed a preference for embedded ethical discussion within the design studio rather than separate formal instruction. The experiment demonstrated that modular AI education is both scalable and practical, highlighting the importance of phase-sensitive guidance, balanced technical and ethical framing, and institutional support such as cloud platforms and research-based AI tools. The integration enhanced students’ digital adaptability and strategic thinking while prompting reflection on issues such as authorship, algorithmic bias, and accountability in human–AI collaboration. These findings offer a replicable model for AI-integrated design pedagogy that balances technical training with critical awareness.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; AI ethics; architectural education; design studio; modular integration; undergraduate curriculum reform; questionnaire artificial intelligence; AI ethics; architectural education; design studio; modular integration; undergraduate curriculum reform; questionnaire

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Shi, Y.; Chen, X.; Lan, Y.; Liu, S. Teaching with Artificial Intelligence in Architecture: Embedding Technical Skills and Ethical Reflection in a Core Design Studio. Buildings 2025, 15, 3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173069

AMA Style

Wang J, Shi Y, Chen X, Lan Y, Liu S. Teaching with Artificial Intelligence in Architecture: Embedding Technical Skills and Ethical Reflection in a Core Design Studio. Buildings. 2025; 15(17):3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jiaqi, Yu Shi, Xiang Chen, Yi Lan, and Shuying Liu. 2025. "Teaching with Artificial Intelligence in Architecture: Embedding Technical Skills and Ethical Reflection in a Core Design Studio" Buildings 15, no. 17: 3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173069

APA Style

Wang, J., Shi, Y., Chen, X., Lan, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Teaching with Artificial Intelligence in Architecture: Embedding Technical Skills and Ethical Reflection in a Core Design Studio. Buildings, 15(17), 3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173069

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop