Next Article in Journal
Numerical Study of Surrounding Rock Damage in Deep-Buried Tunnels for Building-Integrated Underground Structures
Previous Article in Journal
Reconstruction of Old Pavements Based on Resonant Rubblization Technology: A Review of Technological Progress, Engineering Applications, and Intelligent Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimizing Public Space Quality in High-Density Old Districts of Asian Megacities: Thermal Environment Analysis of Shenzhen’s Urban Fringe

School of Architecture and Environmental Art, Sichuan Fine Arts Institute, Chongqing 401331, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(13), 2166; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132166
Submission received: 3 May 2025 / Revised: 17 June 2025 / Accepted: 19 June 2025 / Published: 21 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate)

Abstract

High density old districts at the urban fringes of Asian megacities, such as Shenzhen, face significant thermal challenges due to dense building clusters, limited airflow, and heat retention. This study adopts an integrated approach combining Phoenics wind simulation, geographic information system (GIS) modeling, and spatial prototype analysis to assess and optimize the wind and thermal environments in these urban areas. It investigates how spatial configurations, including building density, height distribution, orientation, and green space integration, influence wind flow and thermal comfort. The results demonstrate that optimized spatial arrangements, including reduced building density, height adjustments, and strategic landscape design, improve ventilation and temperature regulation. Comparative analyses of different spatial prototypes reveal that radial configurations effectively channel external winds into the urban core, enhancing internal airflow, whereas rectangular layouts create wind shadows that hinder ventilation. Adjustments to building façades and vertical arrangements further mitigate pedestrian-level heat accumulation. Interventions in public spaces, including green roofs and vertical greening, offer cooling benefits and mitigate urban heat island effects. This study underscores the importance of aligning urban design with natural wind flow and offers a framework for sustainable landscape and architectural strategies in high-density, heat-prone environments. The findings offer valuable insights for urban planners and policymakers seeking sustainable development in similar megacities.

1. Introduction

The latest World Cities Report by UN-Habitat [1] highlights that billions of urban residents may face an additional temperature increase of at least 0.5 °C by 2040, which poses a growing challenge to urban livability. This trend is particularly concerning in rapidly urbanizing cities, such as Shenzhen, a representative megacity in Asia, where high-density old districts on the urban fringe experience significant thermal discomfort.
As a typical product of uneven urban spatial development, urban villages exhibit prominent non-standardized spatial attributes: irregular spatial layout, aging infrastructure, and mixed-function environmental patterns together constitute their core spatial contradictions [2]. In terms of the external environment, these areas are often closely surrounded by new urban areas with high-density development, and their wind environment quality and thermal comfort are obviously degraded by the continuous influence of the urban heat island effect [3]. It is noteworthy that the existing building groups, public spaces, and vegetation configurations are mostly formed based on historical development needs, and this traditional spatial organization pattern is difficult to effectively adapt to the current increasingly severe microclimate change challenges in the context of high-density cities [4].
Furthermore, as architectural entities with profound historical roots [5], urban villages have evolved gradually from naturally grown settlements to integrated components within the broader urban planning framework. The dynamic evolution of their spatial patterns—encompassing building arrangements, road networks, and public spaces—has given rise to complex and fragmented spatial layouts. The spatial structure of these areas serves as a critical determinant of their internal wind environment, with distinct spatial configurations generating unique wind patterns and thermal characteristics. Thus, the systematic analysis and feature extraction of spatial archetypal wind environment features can effectively refine the classification system of wind environments in old urban areas, thereby enhancing the relevance of planning and design strategies.
From the perspective of research content evolution, the field of wind environment simulation has exhibited a pronounced trajectory toward methodological refinement, with notable advancements particularly observed in the study of wind environments and microclimatic characteristics of specific spatial typologies [6]. In the early stage, wind environment simulation research mostly focused on the overall scale of urban climate analysis, with the wind and heat environment as the core, providing theoretical support for regional planning, ventilation corridor construction [7], greenway system design, and urban surface temperature change prediction [8]. With the deepening of the research, wind environment simulation was gradually applied to smaller-scale space types and has covered diverse scenarios such as urban areas [9,10], street spaces [11,12,13], monolithic buildings [14], vegetation configurations [15], and the assessment of extreme climate scenarios [16,17]. Meanwhile, microclimate, as a key factor affecting human thermal comfort [18], pushes the research scope to contract further and the analysis object to be more specific. Areas such as small-volume urban villages [19], historic districts [20], and streets and alleys of traditional settlements [21,22] all present differentiated wind environment characteristics due to their unique spatial patterns. Additionally, scholars such as Shirzadi have focused on the typical spatial type of urban intersections, systematically exploring optimization pathways and characterization methods for their wind environment simulation techniques [23].
From the dimension of research methodology, the existing wind environment research is mainly divided into two types of methodological paths: one is classification modeling based on spatial type modules, and the other is targeted optimization for a single case. The two methods have their own advantages and disadvantages: classification research is mostly based on key parameters such as building density, orientation, layout, height, etc. [24], and the spatial prototype model is constructed through a subjective induction method, which has a certain degree of universality, but its over-qualitative treatment makes it difficult to cope with the complex and changing spatial patterns in the actual project [25]. In contrast, case studies, rooted in in situ analysis, provide specific optimization suggestions but often lack generalizability due to limited commonality extraction [19,26]. To address these limitations, some scholars have effectively improved the completeness and applicability of their research results by increasing the categorization dimensions [27] or introducing a practical feedback mechanism [28]. For example, Fang H et al. expanded the scope of sampling sites and classified urban village spaces by combining the three dimensions of household density, enclosure degree, and dispersion, systematically exploring the relationship between different spaces and wind environment indicators, which is both empirical and methodological [29].
From the perspective of research object expansion, wind environment research has gradually shifted from independent analysis of single-layout building or vegetation elements to multi-factor coupling and holistic analysis. It is worth noting that some studies have adopted the conditional qualification method to categorize and simulate single elements [29], but it is easy to ignore the potential influence of other spatial factors. In fact, the layout and morphology of buildings, streets, and vegetation, as the core elements of the spatial structure of the site [30,31], show synergistic effects of their attributes in shaping the wind environment and thermal comfort. Although single-element studies can reveal the relationship mechanism between specific variables and wind environment characteristics more clearly, their explanatory power in complex sites is susceptible to multi-factor interference; while multi-factor classification and holistic analysis face the challenge of cross-interference of variables, their conclusions are closer to the actual spatial context, and their theoretical explanatory power and practical guidance significance are more prominent. For example, Hu et al. comprehensively considered the three dimensions of neighborhoods, streets, and buildings in their research [28]; Zhu et al. developed a multi-scale simulation and analysis framework integrating macro, meso, and micro scales from the perspectives of wind, thermal, and acoustic environments [32].
In terms of methods and tools, CFD (computational fluid dynamics) simulation technology is a numerical modeling method for analyzing wind environments [6,33]. Compared to traditional wind tunnel experiments, it has a more significant advantage in terms of convenience and intuitiveness and is widely used in urban planning and architectural design. The current mainstream tools include ANSYS Fluent 2022 R2, Phoenics 2022, Ladybug 1.5.0, and ClimateStudio 1.9.x. Among these, ANSYS Fluent is often used for mechanical engineering simulations, while Phoenics is more suitable for analyzing the wind environment outside buildings and the wind flow in urban canyons [34], and it supports modeling complex buildings. It can also be used in conjunction with ArcGIS [1], remote sensing [35], and spatial syntax analysis [34], significantly enhancing the ability to assess multiple scales of space.
Therefore, this study centers on high-density urban villages, taking Shenzhen as a case study, and employs Phoenics wind simulation technology to derive regional summer wind environment simulation results. A comprehensive qualitative research approach is proposed, encompassing three hierarchical levels: spatial prototype generalization, comparative analysis of wind environment characteristics, and classification-based strategy formulation. This study provides theoretical and practical value for understanding how to use spatial configurations to improve the thermal comfort and sustainability of similarly structured urban areas and offers targeted intervention pathways for promoting sustainable design, enhancing livability, and strengthening climate resilience in high-density urban village environments.

2. Wind Environment Characteristics of Urban Villages in Shenzhen

2.1. Macroclimatic Characteristics in Shenzhen

As one of the four central cities in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area and with a longitude ranging from 113.53° E to 114.52° E and a latitude ranging from 22.25° N to 22.75° N, Shenzhen is characterized by an important geographic location and numerous ports of entry. Since the 1980s, its accelerated industrialization and urbanization have made it a symbol of China’s reform and opening up. By 2019, Shenzhen’s built-up area had reached 927.96 square kilometers, with a resident population of 13,438,800 and an average daily population of 21,830,000, with a large portion of the population located in Bao’an District [36]. However, given this high-density population, heat generated by human activities, such as urban construction and associated atmospheric pollution, has intensified the deterioration of the wind environment and enhanced the heat island effect in urban areas [37].
Shenzhen has a subtropical oceanic monsoon climate with abundant precipitation; its rainy season occurs from April to September each year, and its total annual rainfall is approximately 2000 mm. In summer, under the influence of subtropical high-pressure systems, hot weather is common, and the hottest month is generally July, with the highest temperature in history reaching 38.7 °C; therefore, the area is highly susceptible to the effects of extremely hot weather. Under the influence of monsoons, southeasterly winds prevail in Shenzhen in summer and are often influenced by low-pressure and tropical cyclone systems, with high temperatures and heavy rainfall (Figure 1).

2.2. Study Area and Wind Environment Characteristics in Urban Villages

2.2.1. Study Area

The study area is located in the Xixiang Street region of Bao’an District, Shenzhen (Figure 2), and is strategically situated within a regional ventilation corridor that remains largely unaffected by mountain-induced shading. This district originated as a settlement with villages and townships on the basis of historical urban thermal comfort needs rather than natural urban development patterns. Since urban expansion accelerated in 1978, suburban construction has gradually enveloped the district, and the district reached 100% urbanization in 2000; however, older buildings within the core area have been largely preserved.
The spatial organization of the area includes an increase in building density and age from the periphery toward the interior. Field studies and data collection indicate that most buildings were constructed between 1990 and 2010; these buildings predominantly range from mid-rise structures (20–60 m) to low-rise buildings (under 20 m), and high-rise structures are present at the lowest frequency. The majority of buildings are residential, with limited education, recreation, and healthcare facilities; public green spaces; and water systems. The current spatial and environmental configuration of urban villages is characterized by high-density development, inadequate ventilation, and limited landscape quality; therefore, urban villages face unique challenges in achieving wind and thermal comfort. Poor wind circulation can intensify air pollution and heat island effects because of high population density, whereas inadequate thermal comfort can lead to decreased quality of life and increased energy consumption for cooling and heating due to the consequent need for effective temperature regulation. In this study, wind environment simulation technology and urban morphology classification are used to analyze the wind environment types in the study area; then, the underlying mechanisms are identified, and adaptive optimization strategies are proposed from both architectural and landscape perspectives.

2.2.2. Wind Environment Characteristics in Urban Villages in Shenzhen

The compact architecture and narrow streets common in Shenzhen’s urban villages create a complex and constrained wind environment, hindering natural ventilation and limiting the reflective and absorptive capacity of surfaces and vegetation. While some coastal areas in Shenzhen exhibit favorable ventilation conditions that enhance urban airflow, the specific density and spatial configuration of urban villages hinder the efficacy of these ventilation corridors. High ground friction caused by clusters of densely packed buildings further decreases the wind speed.
At the interfaces between urban villages and adjacent high-rise buildings, abrupt height differences often induce localized strong airflows between buildings. Conversely, in zones with more gradual height variations, airflow rarely reaches ground level, which creates a “roof effect” that traps heat at the pedestrian level and intensifies thermal discomfort. Addressing these challenges requires tailored interventions to improve both the microclimate and overall wind comfort within these unique high-density urban spaces.

3. Materials and Methods

In this study, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology is employed to analyze the wind environment of urban villages in Shenzhen. CFD is chosen for its ability to solve fluid dynamics problems numerically and its successful applications in various fields. The methodology was selected with the aim of providing data support for the design of transformation strategies by simulating and evaluating the wind environment. Data collection and processing, model data preparation, and detailed analysis methods were undertaken to ensure accurate and reliable simulation results (Figure 3).

3.1. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Technology

In 1933, British scientist George Templeton advanced the field of CFD by employing numerical methods to solve two-dimensional partial differential equations for viscous fluids. CFD encompasses a broad spectrum of computational techniques and fluid dynamics principles. Tools such as Phoenics and Fluent, among others [38], are commonly used in the field. Currently, the application of CFD technology is rapidly expanding into various domains, such as indoor and outdoor ventilation, urban planning, building fire prevention, and pollutant dispersion, and remarkable success across these fields has been attained.
In this work, we select the wind environment of urban villages in Shenzhen as the research object and use Phoenics 2019 (CHAM Ltd., London, UK) and ArcGIS 10.8 (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA) to analyze the typical spatial wind environment and provide data support for the design of transformation strategies.

3.2. Data Sources and Processing

3.2.1. Climate Data

This study is based on the wind direction statistics from June to August over the past four years, obtained from the World Weather Online platform (https://www.worldweatheronline.com/, accessed on 12 February 2024) and the Meteorological Bureau of Shenzhen Municipality (https://weather.sz.gov.cn, accessed on 20 February 2024). The analysis indicates that the prevailing summer wind direction in the study area is southeast, with an average wind speed of approximately 2.6 m/s and an average temperature of around 29 °C.

3.2.2. Model Data

The site model data were obtained from BIGEMAP 30.0.0.0 and imported into the ArcGIS platform, where they were verified and refined using high-resolution satellite imagery. Based on this, spatial models were constructed with the aid of 3D modeling software such as Blender 4.3.0 and SketchUp 2022 in preparation for subsequent wind environment simulations using the Phoenics platform.

3.3. Analysis Methods and Procedures

3.3.1. Area Modeling

To ensure a certain range of simulation and to prevent the boundary from being too small and having an effect on the interior, the simulation domain was carefully selected to be five times the length and width of the selected site, and the height of the simulation domain was set to be approximately three times the height of the tallest building in the area. This approach helps mitigate the impact of the boundary conditions on the internal wind environment simulation results.

3.3.2. Regional Wind Environment Formulation

Based on the previously obtained wind environment data, the site-specific wind environment model was constructed using the Wind Attributes module in the simulation software (accessed via Object > New Object > Wind > Attributes). The parameters were configured as follows: the external temperature was set to 29 °C, representing the average summer temperature of the site; the wind speed was set to 2.6 m/s; and the wind direction was defined as S–S–E, corresponding to the prevailing southeast-southerly wind. The profile type was selected as power law, considering the flat terrain in Bao’an District, Shenzhen. The vertical direction was set as Z.
For surface roughness, the effective roughness height was set to Parkland, reflecting the urban context of the site. To ensure unimpeded airflow, Include Open Sky was enabled (Yes), while External Radiative Link was also enabled (Yes), with Texternal adjusted to 0. The Ground Plane was disabled (No), and the WAWP option was enabled (Yes). The reference height was set at 1.5 m, representing the standard pedestrian level for assessing wind comfort [39].

3.3.3. Grid Division

Grid division in the simulation area affects the calculation accuracy, and a greater density of grid cells in the study region correlates with a higher accuracy of the simulation results. In this work, a high-density grid is established in the main study domain and near the ground (a = 1.5 m), a low-density grid approach is used outside the simulation area and is extremely close to and far from the ground (a < 1.5 m or a > 1.5 m), and a gradual change in the division method is adopted to ensure a certain degree of accuracy while increasing the computational speed given the actual wind environment in the study area [40].

3.4. Classification of Wind Environment Suitability

Different factors affect the evaluation of the wind environment in urban villages, and the reasonable selection of various factors affecting the wind environment is conducive to the continuous improvement of wind environment evaluation systems. On the basis of relevant studies, wind speed is classified into 5 levels according to human perception and thermal comfort levels (Table 1).

4. Results

Based on the established research methodology (Figure 3), the wind environment simulation results for the site were obtained (Figure 4a). The spatial types of the site were systematically categorized (Figure 4b), encompassing typical features of urban villages such as building forms, public space configurations, and vegetation layouts. In addition, the “Image–Analysis–Record Measurement” function in Photoshop 2022 was employed to conduct a quantitative analysis of the simulation results, measuring the area and corresponding proportion of each wind speed category (Table 2 and Figure 5).
The overall analysis indicates that the wind environment at the site is generally poor, with the area occupied by higher wind speeds decreasing correspondingly. Integrating the suitability classification results reveals that the largest proportion, 45.7%, corresponds to unsuitable areas, followed by relatively suitable areas at 41.8%, while suitable and highly suitable areas account for only 6.6% and 5.9%, respectively. These findings demonstrate the generally poor wind conditions in urban villages. Moreover, comparison of wind speed and occupied area shows that the extent of unsuitable areas associated with low wind speeds far exceeds that related to high wind speeds. This pattern is closely linked to the unique architectural layout of the densely built old city and its complex public space network. Therefore, systematically categorizing spatial prototypes based on wind environment analysis is crucial for understanding wind environment characteristics and guiding microclimate improvements in old urban districts.
Urban spatial morphology is a product of urban spatial interactions and serves as the foundation for deconstructing the spatial characteristics of high-density urban villages. This field of study encompasses morphology analysis, environmental behavior, and political economy research, all of which contribute to a comprehensive understanding of urban form and function [41]. Therefore, building on the aforementioned categories, this study further investigates the relationship between spatial prototypes and the wind environment through a finer spatial classification and analysis of their corresponding wind characteristics.
Overall, among the three types under similar density conditions, the belt extension type generally exhibited better spatial performance in urban villages, whereas the low-density point grouping type presented the most favorable wind conditions. With respect to public space prototypes, wind conditions varied among types, with staggered alleys presenting the poorest ventilation performance, whereas single-sided open parks offered the most suitable wind environment. For architectural space prototypes, building elevation configurations posed certain challenges for wind optimization, whereas vertical space contributed to the formation of unique microclimates in urban villages. The staggered and overlapping features of the fifth elevation provided diverse possibilities for improving local wind environments and thermal comfort. In terms of plant relationship prototypes, moderate vegetation density and height had the potential to regulate microclimatic conditions and support the development of favorable wind environments.

4.1. Building Group Prototypes

According to the different spatial characteristics of building group spaces with different development modes, building group prototypes can be categorized into three forms: encircling diffusion, belt extension, and point arrangement types (Table 3).

4.1.1. Encircling Diffusion Type

Rapid urban expansion presents a pattern of spatial diffusion in urban villages characterized by clusters that radiate outward in a dispersed configuration. This encircling diffusion typically originates from the central areas of urban villages, where building groups form semi-enclosed, outward-spreading clusters. Around natural resources such as lakes, green spaces, and adjacent settlements, the spatial layout extends in a pattern that reflects the characteristics of the surrounding environment. These clusters generally exhibit high overall building density with low-rise, tightly packed structures, and the buildings in these clusters are typically relatively old. Consequently, this spatial arrangement restricts natural airflow, which results in a limited wind environment and confined air circulation within these areas.

4.1.2. Belt Extension Type

Urban belts are often located around main roads, rivers, and other linear features. As development occurs on both sides of these belts, planning often varies, with different building layouts and corridors. Thus, the ventilation direction in belt zones often misaligns with the ventilation corridors in neighboring urban areas, which results in highly variable and often limited ventilation conditions.

4.1.3. Point Arrangement Type

Point arrangements are mostly located within center-periphery road networks and are caused by initial urban construction development. The overall building volume is small, the building arrangement is regular, and the building density is gradually reduced from the inside to the outside of these areas. The road width, building spacing, and building height increase accordingly, but the overall changes in these factors are not large. The density of these spaces is lower than that in central urban areas. Notably, in point arrangement areas, there are gray spaces that are well ventilated, such as street corners and courtyards, and the overall ventilation conditions are generally sufficient.

4.1.4. In-Depth Wind Analysis of Building Group Prototypes

Following the above wind environment analysis of different building layout types, the “Record Measurement” method was further applied to quantify the proportion of areas under various wind speed classes for each spatial configuration (Figure 6). The results indicate that for most spatial types, the wind environment is predominantly characterized by grades A–C, with wind speeds largely concentrated in the 0.00–0.94 m/s range. The major belt (Figure 6e) and low-density point grouping (Figure 6h) exhibit a relatively higher proportion of areas with wind speeds exceeding 0.94 m/s, suggesting more favorable wind conditions resulting from their downwind-oriented strip layouts and lower building density. In contrast, strip point grouping (Figure 6i) demonstrates poor wind performance, with 95.09% of its area experiencing wind speeds below 0.31 m/s and the remaining areas also falling within suboptimal wind conditions.

4.1.5. Architectural Space Prototypes

Architectural spaces in urban villages can be classified into three primary spatial forms on the basis of their structural characteristics: architectural façade type, fifth elevation type, and vertical space type. Each prototype uniquely influences wind flow and thermal comfort in these high-density areas (Table 4).
  • Architectural Façade Type
The architectural façade type refers to the varied and complex external surfaces of buildings in urban villages. These façades typically feature a mix of older facilities, diverse door and window styles, and numerous balconies, all of which increase surface roughness. This roughness disrupts wind circulation, traps heat near ground level, and reduces ventilation efficiency. Additionally, the dense visual effect created by these varied façade elements contributes to a psychological perception of increased warmth, which intensifies thermal discomfort. For clarity and consistency, the term architectural façade type is used throughout the manuscript to uniformly describe these external building features and their impact on the microclimate.
  • Fifth Elevation Type
In urban villages characterized by high building density and low floor area ratios, the fifth elevation type refers to building rooftops and provides open, unobstructed spaces with minimal shading from surrounding structures. However, these rooftops are often cluttered with equipment, which limits their potential to enhance ventilation. Effective design strategies for these fifth elevations can improve airflow and reduce heat accumulation.
  • Vertical Space Type
The vertical space type describes the narrow gaps between closely spaced buildings, which form a network of ventilation seams. These confined spaces typically experience lower wind speeds than main roads or other open spaces but are crucial for internal air circulation within high-density areas. Enhancing the design and spacing of these vertical spaces can improve the airflow within these compact settings.

4.2. Public Space Prototypes

The different spatial characteristics of public spaces can be divided into ventilation components: parks, streets, and corner courtyards (Table 5 and Table 6).

4.2.1. Park Type

Fields and parks are generally central activity areas in urban villages and are located in inner urban zones. Features of this type also include irregular green spaces, lakes, sports fields, flat dams, and open spaces, among others, with buildings adjacent to the periphery and limited ecological elements. Owing to the relative openness of these urban areas, the wind flow conditions are generally satisfactory; thus, these areas meet the minimum criteria for effective ventilation and thermal comfort, which are typically defined by wind speeds of at least 1–2 meters per second at the pedestrian level. However, severe shading by buildings at the edges of these areas leads to a moderating effect on the regional climate; therefore, many of these areas cannot be effectively integrated with the local wind corridors, and their influence occurs primarily in downwind areas.

4.2.2. Street Type

Narrow streets and alleys are concentrated mainly in central urban areas; when these narrow streets and alleys are closer to the interior of urban areas, the road structures become more complex. These streets vary in width, and the layout on both sides of the streets can be variable, with limited areas for walking, landscaping, and parking in most cases. Moreover, gray space and transition areas are lacking, and most of these streets are directly adjacent to building façades. In general, street access is sheltered, with narrow passages, high congestion, and poor ventilation.

4.2.3. Corner Courtyard Type

Street corner courtyards are mostly located on both sides of roads, at interchanges, in front of houses, and in other places; they are distributed and scattered, covering a wide area. Ventilation is limited by the narrowness, irregularity, and poor continuity of these spaces. Therefore, this type of space plays a limited role in the regulation of the surrounding climate, but the air circulation here is generally greater than that in other interior urban areas.

4.2.4. In-Depth Wind Analysis of Public Space Prototype

The analysis of public spaces reveals distinct variations in wind conditions. Wind speeds in staggered alleys, bilateral alleyways, and internal courtyards are predominantly concentrated within the low wind speed categories A (0.00–0.31 m/s) and B (0.31–0.63 m/s). Single-sided open parks (Figure 7c) exhibit a relatively large proportion of area falling within the moderately suitable wind speed range G–K (1.88–3.45 m/s), although a small portion remains unsuitable due to excessively high wind speeds. Within single-sided open parks, the areas classified as highly suitable and suitable account for 5.05% and 13.23% of the total, respectively (Figure 7c). Additionally, parts of low-density green space (Figure 7a), crossroad alleyways (Figure 7e), and street-side courtyards (Figure 7h) also fall within the relatively suitable wind speed range.

4.3. Plant Relationship Prototypes

The spatial distribution of plants can be classified on the basis of their density in the urban plane and their vertical height (Table 7). Reasonable planning of the horizontal density and vertical height of plants can effectively mitigate the UHI effect and improve residents’ quality of life. For example, a horizontal density that ensures at least 30% green cover in urban areas can significantly contribute to mitigating the UHI effect. Vertically, plants of varying heights can provide different levels of shade. Foliage shields buildings from solar radiation and wind [42]. The canopies formed by tall trees provide extensive shaded areas and help reduce the air temperature in these areas, whereas shorter shrubs and ground cover plants can decrease the heat absorbed from paved surfaces and thereby lower the overall temperature of the surrounding environment.

4.3.1. Planar Density

The distribution of vegetation with different planar densities creates shaded areas of varying sizes. These shaded areas reduce the direct sunlight on the ground and building surfaces to varying degrees; thus, the amount of heat absorbed by these surfaces is regulated, and the surface temperatures change. This temperature regulation is particularly important for mitigating the UHI effect since buildings and hard surfaces in cities absorb and reradiate a significant amount of heat. The presence of vegetation can effectively reduce the temperatures of these surfaces and create a cooler and more comfortable living environment for urban residents.

4.3.2. Vertical Height

Vegetation at different vertical heights can form a multilayered greening structure. Tall vegetation, such as trees, can provide large areas of shade, whereas low-level vegetation, such as shrubs and herbaceous plants, can fill in spaces and reduce ground-level heat radiation. This multilayered greening structure helps create a microclimate, regulates the local temperature and humidity, and enhances the thermal comfort of residents.

4.3.3. Comparative Analysis of Wind Environments

This study conducted separate wind simulation experiments on selected spatial prototypes featuring varying vegetation densities and vertical heights. For each prototype, comparative analyses were performed between vegetated and unvegetated scenarios to investigate the influence of vegetation characteristics on the wind environment (Table 8). The results indicate that, in terms of horizontal layout, excessively high vegetation density can significantly impede air circulation, whereas moderate vegetation density or isolated plants can effectively guide wind direction within confined spaces or mitigate elevated wind speeds caused by canyon effects. Regarding vertical structure, vegetation of medium height notably reduces wind speed along roadways, while lower shrub belts tend to uniformly increase wind speed in the same areas.

5. Discussion

5.1. Planning and Renovation Strategies

The form of the urban layout plays a crucial role in influencing the wind environment. The layout should be designed with the goal of “overall first, then local,” and the transformations are divided into three levels: the community, residential units, and building units. This three-pronged approach is used to reduce wind loss, guide winds into windless areas, reduce the temperature of the building surfaces, and adjust the building layout, building height, building density, and building form to increase the comfort level of the wind environment and improve the internal thermal environment in urban areas (Table 9).
In this context, the main methods and measures are as follows: (1) community-wide renovation—removing obstacles, increasing the width of ventilation corridors, and providing reasonable access to certain point spaces; (2) residential unit renovation—reducing the building density, adjusting the building layout, and adopting stepped treatment at the top of buildings; and (3) single-unit building renovation—establishing buildings of appropriate heights, reasonably utilizing rooftops, optimizing the material used for façades, and streamlining corner design. These factors contribute to improved ventilation, reduced surface layer temperature of buildings, limited wind speed reductions, and the attainment of a comfortable wind environment.
The supplementary and contingency measures mainly include (1) optimizing the ventilation paths, (2) reasonably using the topography to further guide the wind flow direction, (3) establishing greening to supplement the bare areas between buildings, and (4) adopting an urban structure that maximizes wind comfort and uses a vignette-based structure to adjust the wind pressure.

5.2. Landscape Intervention Measures

Blue–green spaces refer to spaces composed of water bodies and vegetation provided by natural ecosystems [43]; the construction of these spaces is key to developing urban ecological systems and is highly important for improving the thermal environment in urban villages. The adjustment from the overall pattern to specific neighborhood layouts is represented in the construction of a three-dimensional grid of ecological corridors at the macro level and in the optimization of the spatial configurations at the micro level to fully exploit the cooling benefits of plants and water bodies (Table 10).
In this context, the main approaches and measures are as follows: (1) at the regional planning level, optimizing the native ecology at given points, strengthening the connections between the points, and establishing a regional ecological network through eco-acupuncture need to be emphasized, and (2) at the neighborhood level, the areas of vegetation and water bodies need to be increased, the layout should be rationalized, the role of natural elements in the regulation of the climate needs to be fully understood, and the local microclimatic environment needs to be artificially improved by applying surface shading and artificial humidification methods.
The supplementary and contingency measures mainly include the following: (1) introduce interactive water features in public spaces for regular cooling; (2) establish a multilevel greening system to create clear wind paths, change the wind direction, and provide shade using the joint effects of plants at different levels; (3) use permeable and low-reflectivity sustainable paving materials to create resilient spaces; (4) establish green belts to guide wind flows between high-density built-up areas and natural areas to promote airflow and circulation; and (5) improve nighttime cooling systems by installing automatic nighttime sprinkler systems in neighborhoods and public spaces to promote evaporation for the mitigation of heat accumulation during the day.

5.3. Specific Associations Between Spatial Prototypes and Wind Environments

The classification of spatial prototypes used as the main framework in this study effectively reveals the relationships between specific layout forms and wind environments and aligns well with existing generalized classifications [29] and comparative studies [28]. Previous research on building classification has focused on differences in thermal environments across varying building densities and heights [35] but has rarely provided detailed categorizations on the basis of spatial morphology, such as street width or block size. Moreover, urban space and microclimate studies have shown that in addition to the planar layout of residential clusters, building attributes—including orientation, arrangement, massing, openness, and shading—significantly influence local wind conditions [28], which is consistent with the building-type classifications in this study of urban villages. Moreover, vegetation, as a critical element of urban residual spaces, plays a vital role in modulating the wind environment. Some studies have demonstrated that a rational vegetation configuration is key to improving airflow, and an optimized green space layout can alleviate the population’s experiential demands [1]. Given the complex living environment in urban villages, enhancing green spaces can provide more comfortable conditions, and the landscape vegetation strategies discussed herein offer relevant guidance.

5.4. Limitations and Future Research Directions

In this study, simulated data based on the climatic and urban conditions of Shenzhen’s high-density villages are used; because of this, the generalizability of this method is likely limited to this climate type and may not be applicable to other regions with different climatic or urban characteristics. While the simulation provides valuable insights into urban wind dynamics, empirical studies involving real-world data would be beneficial for validating and refining these strategies across longer timescales and in varied environmental contexts. Importantly, key thermal factors, such as the sky view factor, albedo, and surface heat storage, were not considered in the current simulations, which limits the scope of the thermal modeling. Future researchers could modify and test this model in diverse climatic zones by incorporating additional factors that may influence thermal comfort to assess its broader applicability and explore how local environmental factors may influence the effectiveness of spatial and landscape interventions.
Moreover, in this study, advanced simulation tools capable of capturing more complex interactions between urban structures and dynamic microclimates were not used, and while GIS and PHOENICS were applied to simulate the urban wind environment, their use presents specific limitations. The GIS-based modeling process considered only buildings and excluded vegetation, which can significantly affect airflow in high-density settings. Furthermore, the building height and location data were not field verified, which may introduce spatial inaccuracies. These issues may lead to localized deviations in the CFD simulation results, especially in narrow alleyways or compact street canyons. The development and use of more sophisticated modeling technologies could enable a finer-grained understanding of airflow and heat distribution patterns in dense urban areas. Additional research could also examine the socioeconomic dimensions of implementing these interventions and evaluate both the feasibility and the potential impact of the proposed landscape and design strategies within various urban contexts.
When this study’s methods and findings are applied to other urban contexts, in addition to local climatic differences, it is necessary to classify and analyze the site layout and building morphology. Urban typologies such as historic districts and mountainous communities have distinct spatial and wind environment characteristics. Therefore, generalization requires the integration of climate factors with these typologies to develop adaptive, context-specific design strategies.

6. Conclusions

This study focused on optimizing the quality of public space in high-density old districts at the urban fringe of Asian megacities, taking Shenzhen as a representative case. Through the integration of wind simulation, geographic information systems (GIS), and spatial prototype analysis, we explored how variations in spatial configuration affect microclimatic conditions and urban livability, with the aim to offer applicable strategies for similar compact urban environments.
The research yielded several key findings:
  • Spatial configurations—including building density, height distribution, orientation, and green space integration—are essential factors that influence thermal comfort and wind environment performance.
  • Reducing the building density, adjusting the height distribution, and embedding vegetation improved ventilation and thermal comfort. Among prototypes, belt extension, low-density point grouping, and single-sided open parks were most effective for wind environment optimization.
  • Radial spatial layouts can effectively channel prevailing winds into dense urban interiors, thereby increasing airflow and reducing heat accumulation.
  • Green infrastructure elements, such as green roofs and vertical greening, significantly alleviate the urban heat island (UHI) effect.
  • The combined application of GIS and wind simulation tools at early planning stages provides effective support for spatial decision-making and environmental performance evaluation.
Overall, this study provides a transferable qualitative framework that informs spatial planning and public space improvement in high-density urban villages. Aligning spatial form optimization with environmental mechanisms, such as wind flow and heat regulation, contributes to adaptive urban design strategies aimed at improving both thermal resilience and the overall quality of urban life. The results offer theoretical guidance and practical reference for urban renewal in rapidly urbanizing contexts, especially across Asia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.R. and X.X.; Methodology, X.X.; Software, X.X.; Validation, J.R.; Formal analysis, J.R. and X.X.; Investigation, X.X.; Resources, J.R.; Data curation, X.X.; Writing—original draft, J.R. and X.X.; Writing—review and editing, J.R., X.X., and J.J.; Visualization, J.J.; Supervision, J.R.; Project administration, J.R.; Funding acquisition, J.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the “Evaluation and Optimization of Spatial Vitality in Mountainous Cities Based on Multi-Source Data Coupling (No. 25MSYB01)” project of the General Research Project of Sichuan Fine Arts Institute, China.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study will be available upon request from the corresponding author when the paper is published.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could appear to have influenced the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. UN-Habitat. World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization, United Nations Human Settlements Programme. 2020. Available online: https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2020-the-value-of-sustainable-urbanization (accessed on 10 January 2025).
  2. Tan, W.; Li, J.; Mai, Y.; Ma, Q. Analysis of the Transformation Dilemma of China’s Development Zones from the Perspective of Space Production Theory: Take Zhangzhou Development Zone as an Example. Urban Dev. Stud. 2023, 30, 25–28+34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peng, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Chan, P.; Lee, T.; Peng, F.; Wong, M.; Li, Y. Wind Weakening in a Dense High-Rise City Due to Over Nearly Five Decades of Urbanization. Build. Environ. 2018, 138, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Tam, C.; Pan, W.; Chen, J.; Hu, C.; Ren, C.; Wei, W.; Yang, S. The Projected Effects of Urbanization and Climate Change on Summer Thermal Environment in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area of China. Urban Clim. 2021, 37, 100866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wei, L.; Yan, X. “Urban Village”: Transformation Under the Premise of Survival—An Overview of the Feasibility Model of “Urban Village” Transformation. City Plan. Rev. 2005, 24, 9–13+56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, Z.; Zhang, H. Digital Model of CFD Simulation Design in Urban Planning. City Plan. Rev. 2007, 31, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, K.; Shan, L. Make Way for the Wind—Promoting Urban Wind Corridor Planning by Integrating RS, GIS, and CFD in Urban Planning and Design to Mitigate the Heat Island Effect. Atmosphere 2024, 15, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Toparlar, Y.; Blocken, B.; Vos, P.; Heijst, G.; Janssen, W.; Hooff, T.; Montazeri, H.; Timmermans, H. CFD Simulation and Validation of Urban Microclimate: A Case Study for Bergpolder Zuid, Rotterdam. Build. Environ. 2015, 83, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takahashi, K.; Yoshida, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Aotake, N.; Wang, F. Measurement of Thermal Environment in Kyoto City and its Prediction by CFD Simulation. Energy Build. 2004, 36, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Azizi, M.; Javanmardi, K. The Effects of Urban Block Forms on the Patterns of Wind and Natural Ventilation. Procedia Eng. 2017, 180, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ramponi, R.; Blocken, B.; Coo, L.; Janssen, W. CFD Simulation of Outdoor Ventilation of Generic Urban Configurations with Different Urban Densities and Equal and Unequal Street Widths. Build. Environ. 2015, 92, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ying, X.; Kan, Q. The Influence of Street Spatial Layout Factors on Wind Environment in Hangzhou, Zhejiang. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2018, 38, 2093–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, T.; Yin, S.; Yu, B.; He, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Li, X. A Review of Rapid Prediction Methods for Wind Environment on the Urban Block Scale. Build. Sci. 2025, 41, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bouyer, J.; Inard, C.; Musy, M. Microclimatic Coupling as a Solution to Improve Building Energy Simulation in an Urban Context. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hosseinzadeh, A.; Bottacin-Busolin, A.; Keshmiri, A. A parametric Study on the Effects of Green Roofs, Green Walls and Trees on Air Quality, Temperature and Velocity. Buildings 2022, 12, 2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, D.-Y.; Yang, L.; Feng, L.-Y.; Liu, J.; Hong, X.-C. Optimizing Green Spaces Significantly Improves Wind Environment and Accessibility in County Towns. Land 2025, 14, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, R.; Wang, Y.; Lin, H.; Du, H.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Huang, M. A Mesoscale CFD Simulation Study of Basic Wind Pressure in Complex Terrain—A Case Study of Taizhou City. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mirzaei, P. CFD Modeling of Micro and Urban Climates: Problems to be Solved in the New Decade. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 69, 102839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peng, C.; Zou, Z.; Hong, L.; Pan, Q. Numerical Simulation of Wind and Thermal Environment in Inner Cities and Strategies for Partial Renewal: A Case Study of Dazhimen, Wuhan. City Plan. Rev. 2016, 40, 16–24. Available online: https://www.planning.org.cn/thesis/view?id=9257 (accessed on 12 June 2025).
  20. Lai, B.; Fu, J.; Guo, C.; Zhang, D.; Wu, Z. Street Geometry Factors Influencing Outdoor Pedestrian Thermal Comfort in a Historic District. Buildings 2025, 15, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Q.; Lai, X.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, A. Research on Climate Adaptability of Traditional Settlements of the Dong Ethnic Group. J. Hum. Settl. West China 2023, 38, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, H.; Xia, H.; Dong, L. Impact Effects of Traditional Settlement Spaces on the Wind Environment in Hot and Humid Regions with Gentle Airflow. J. Shenyang Jianzhu Univ. Nat. Sci. 2024, 40, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shirzadi, M.; Naghashzadegan, M.; Mirzaei, P. Improving the CFD Modelling of Cross-ventilation in Highly-packed Urban Areas. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 37, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, P.; Jia, B.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Z. Simulation and Optimization of Summer Wind and Thermal Environments in Blocks Based on Building Heights and Layouts. J. Univ. Jinan 2025, 39, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zeng, S.; Tian, J.; Zeng, J. A Study on Ventilation Efficiency and Optimal Layout of Typical Residential Modules Based on CFD Simulation. Archit. J. 2019, 35, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tork, L.; Tibiriçá, A.; Tibiriçá, Á. Análise Da Ventilação Natural Conforme Planos Diretores: Resultados De Pesquisa Em Belém, PA. Ambiente Construído 2017, 17, 329–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hågbo, T.; Giljarhus, K. Sensitivity of Urban Morphology and the Number of CFD Simulated Wind Directions on Pedestrian Wind Comfort and Safety Assessments. Build. Environ. 2024, 253, 111310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, Y.; Peng, Y.; Gao, Z.; Xu, F. Application of CFD Plug-ins Integrated into Urban and Building Design Platforms for Performance Simulations: A Literature Review. Front. Archit. Res. 2023, 12, 148–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fang, H.; Yang, T.; Dai, P. Research on the Coupling of Public Space Morphology and Summer Wind Environment in Qingdao’s Urban Villages. Buildings 2025, 15, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, L.; Yin, H. Research on the Influence of Plant Community Characteristics on the Health of Residential Wind Environment:Taking Multi-storey Slab Residential Area in Beijing as an Example. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2024, 40, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hong, B.; Lin, B. Study on Optimal Design of Vegetation in Residential District in Winter Coupling Field Experiment and Numerical Simulation. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2014, 30, 104–108. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhu, X.; Yang, J.; Shi, X.; Min, H. Exploration of Multi-scale Urban Design Method Based on Physical Environment Simulation and Optimization-Taking Qiantang River Waterfront as an Example. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2023, 39, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. An, L.; Li, Q.; Liang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Hang, J. A review of Computational Fluid Dynamics applications in urban wind and thermal environments in China. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica 2024, 42, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cao, P.; Li, T. Optimization Study of Outdoor Activity Space Wind Environment in Residential Areas Based on Spatial Syntax and Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, K.; Yu, Z. Comparative and Combinative Study of Urban Heat Island in Wuhan City with Remote Sensing and CFD Simulation. Sensors 2008, 8, 6692–6703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xie, C. Study on the Diurnal Variation Characteristics and Population Exposure to Urban Heat Islands and High-Temperature Heatwaves in Shenzhen. Master’s Thesis, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, Q.; Zou, Z.; Li, H.; Qiu, G. Thermal Environment Characteristics and Heat Island Intensity Analysis of Urban Villages in Shenzhen. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2015, 24, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Miao, Y. Study on the Outside Environment of Winter Olympic Village Based on Wind Environment Comfort. Master’s Thesis, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, H.; Huang, C. Influence of Building Layout on Wind Environment of Urban Residential Communities and Optimization Strategies. Contemp. Hortic. 2024, 47, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gong, C. Numerical Simulation of Wind Environment at Pedestrian Level in Residential Districts. Master’s Thesis, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, Y. Study on Density and Spatial Morphology of Urban Villages. Master’s Thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pragati, S.; Shanthi Priya, R.; Pradeepa, C.; Senthil, R. Simulation of the Energy Performance of a Building with Green Roofs and Green Walls in a Tropical Climate. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, H.; Jin, T.; Liu, W. Study on the Scale and Landscape Pattern Evolution Characteristics of Blue-Green Space in Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou Metropolitan Area, China. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2022, 46, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Climate status of Shenzhen: (a) urban heat island intensity in Shenzhen, (b) summer wind ventilation corridors in Shenzhen, (c) Shenzhen meteorological data, and (d) wind direction in Shenzhen. (a,b) are from the Shenzhen Meteorological Bureau (https://weather.sz.gov.cn/, accessed on 15 Februrary 2024), and (a) is from the Shenzhen Urban Heat Island Monitoring Bulletin 2022 (https://weather.sz.gov.cn/mobile/qixiangfuwu/qihoufuwu/qihouguanceyupinggu/chengshiredaojiance/content/post_10570510.html, accessed on 15 Februrary 2024).
Figure 1. Climate status of Shenzhen: (a) urban heat island intensity in Shenzhen, (b) summer wind ventilation corridors in Shenzhen, (c) Shenzhen meteorological data, and (d) wind direction in Shenzhen. (a,b) are from the Shenzhen Meteorological Bureau (https://weather.sz.gov.cn/, accessed on 15 Februrary 2024), and (a) is from the Shenzhen Urban Heat Island Monitoring Bulletin 2022 (https://weather.sz.gov.cn/mobile/qixiangfuwu/qihoufuwu/qihouguanceyupinggu/chengshiredaojiance/content/post_10570510.html, accessed on 15 Februrary 2024).
Buildings 15 02166 g001
Figure 2. Environmental overview of the study area: (a) aerial view of the study area, (b) location of the study area, (c) building ages in the study area, (d) building heights in the study area, and (e) land use types in the study area. The photographic background of the aerial view of the site in (a) is the author’s own photography; the vector data of the administrative boundary of Shenzhen, water bodies, green areas, roads, etc., in (b) as well as the base maps of the buildings and roads in (ce) were downloaded from BIGEMAP 30.0.0.0 (http://www.bigemap.com/, accessed on 8 January 2025); the age data in (c) were obtained by the authors from websites such as Property for Sale to determine the years of construction and the years of rectification in different neighborhoods; the building height data in (d) and the site data in (e) were downloaded from BIGEMAP 30.0.0.0 (http://www.bigemap.com/, accessed on 8 January 2024).
Figure 2. Environmental overview of the study area: (a) aerial view of the study area, (b) location of the study area, (c) building ages in the study area, (d) building heights in the study area, and (e) land use types in the study area. The photographic background of the aerial view of the site in (a) is the author’s own photography; the vector data of the administrative boundary of Shenzhen, water bodies, green areas, roads, etc., in (b) as well as the base maps of the buildings and roads in (ce) were downloaded from BIGEMAP 30.0.0.0 (http://www.bigemap.com/, accessed on 8 January 2025); the age data in (c) were obtained by the authors from websites such as Property for Sale to determine the years of construction and the years of rectification in different neighborhoods; the building height data in (d) and the site data in (e) were downloaded from BIGEMAP 30.0.0.0 (http://www.bigemap.com/, accessed on 8 January 2024).
Buildings 15 02166 g002
Figure 3. Research process.
Figure 3. Research process.
Buildings 15 02166 g003
Figure 4. Analysis of site wind simulation results and spatial prototype classification. (a) Wind simulation results of the site, (b) classification of site spatial prototypes.
Figure 4. Analysis of site wind simulation results and spatial prototype classification. (a) Wind simulation results of the site, (b) classification of site spatial prototypes.
Buildings 15 02166 g004
Figure 5. Analysis of wind simulation results. (a) Variation in footprint area and suitability across different wind speed categories; (b) proportional distribution of overall suitability classes.
Figure 5. Analysis of wind simulation results. (a) Variation in footprint area and suitability across different wind speed categories; (b) proportional distribution of overall suitability classes.
Buildings 15 02166 g005
Figure 6. Analysis of wind environment comfort for different building layout types. (a) Percentage of wind speed in fan diffusion; (b) percentage of wind speed in radiation; (c) percentage of wind speed in rectangular layout; (d) percentage of wind speed in riverfront ribbon cluster; (e) percentage of wind speed in major belt; (f) percentage of wind speed in secondary strip belt; (g) percentage of wind speed in high-density spot formation; (h) percentage of wind speed in low-density point grouping; (i) percentage of wind speed in strip point grouping. The percentage is calculated as the relative area within the wind speed range divided by the total public area of the studied type, multiplied by 100%.
Figure 6. Analysis of wind environment comfort for different building layout types. (a) Percentage of wind speed in fan diffusion; (b) percentage of wind speed in radiation; (c) percentage of wind speed in rectangular layout; (d) percentage of wind speed in riverfront ribbon cluster; (e) percentage of wind speed in major belt; (f) percentage of wind speed in secondary strip belt; (g) percentage of wind speed in high-density spot formation; (h) percentage of wind speed in low-density point grouping; (i) percentage of wind speed in strip point grouping. The percentage is calculated as the relative area within the wind speed range divided by the total public area of the studied type, multiplied by 100%.
Buildings 15 02166 g006
Figure 7. Analysis of wind environment comfort in different street layout types. (a) Percentage of wind speed in low-density green space; (b) percentage of wind speed in high-density yards; (c) percentage of wind speed in single-sided open parks; (d) percentage of wind speed in staggered alleys; (e) percentage of wind speed in crossroad alleyways; (f) percentage of wind speed in bilateral alleyways; (g) percentage of wind speed in internal courtyards; (h) percentage of wind speed in street-side courtyards; (i) percentage of wind speed in corner spaces. The percentage is calculated as the relative area within the wind speed range divided by the total public area of the studied type, multiplied by 100%.
Figure 7. Analysis of wind environment comfort in different street layout types. (a) Percentage of wind speed in low-density green space; (b) percentage of wind speed in high-density yards; (c) percentage of wind speed in single-sided open parks; (d) percentage of wind speed in staggered alleys; (e) percentage of wind speed in crossroad alleyways; (f) percentage of wind speed in bilateral alleyways; (g) percentage of wind speed in internal courtyards; (h) percentage of wind speed in street-side courtyards; (i) percentage of wind speed in corner spaces. The percentage is calculated as the relative area within the wind speed range divided by the total public area of the studied type, multiplied by 100%.
Buildings 15 02166 g007
Table 1. Wind environment suitability levels.
Table 1. Wind environment suitability levels.
LevelWind Speed (m/s)Suitability Class
12.20 < a ≤ 2.82Very suitable
21.88 < a ≤ 2.20; 2.82 < a ≤ 3.45Appropriate
30.63 < a ≤ 1.88; 3.45 < a ≤ 4.39Generally suitable
40.00 ≤ a ≤ 0.63; 4.39 < a ≤ 5.02Unsuitable
Table 2. Results of quantitative statistics on the wind environment of the site.
Table 2. Results of quantitative statistics on the wind environment of the site.
No.Wind Speed (m/s)Area (m2)Suitability ClassLevelPercentage (%)
A0.00–0.31254,321.83Unsuitable425.49
B0.31–0.63201,098.09Unsuitable420.16
C0.63–0.94177,548.83Generally suitable317.81
D0.94–1.2599,046.22Generally suitable39.93
E1.25–1.5772,432.73Generally suitable37.26
F1.57–1.8862,783.2Generally suitable36.29
G1.88–2.2060,045.57Appropriate26.02
H2.20–2.5142,600.91Very suitable14.27
I2.51–2.8216,580.95Very suitable11.66
J2.82–3.144301.22Appropriate20.43
K2.82–3.451915.15Appropriate20.19
L3.45–3.761408.42Generally suitable30.14
M3.76–4.081600.48Generally suitable30.16
N4.08–4.391830.51Generally suitable30.18
O4.39–4.70118.27Unsuitable40.01
P4.70–5.020Unsuitable40
Public space997,632.38100
Total site2,072,889.54
Note: Wind speeds of 1–15 correspond to the data distributions for each respective wind speed category. Total site denotes the entire study area, while public space refers to the study area excluding building footprints. Percentage (%) indicates the proportion of the area within each wind speed category relative to the total public space area.
Table 3. Building cluster prototypes and wind environment characteristics in urban villages.
Table 3. Building cluster prototypes and wind environment characteristics in urban villages.
Type 1 Encircling DiffusionType 2 Belt ExtensionType 3 Point Arrangement
01 Fan
diffusion
Buildings 15 02166 i001
Limited circulation in downwind areas; enhanced airflow along streets and in pockets.01 Riverfront ribbon cluster
Buildings 15 02166 i002
Perpendicular buildings block airflow; minimal ventilation within clusters.01 High-density spot formation
Buildings 15 02166 i003
Minimal wind; airflow limited to access points.
02 Perimeter block
Buildings 15 02166 i004
Overall wind speed remains low, with slight improvements observed along the site boundaries.02 Major
belt
Buildings 15 02166 i005
Wind directed along roads; restricted interior airflow.02 Low-density point grouping
Buildings 15 02166 i006
Enhanced wind reflection and circulation on the windward side.
03 Semi-enclosed perimeter layout
Buildings 15 02166 i007
The wind environment around the open side shows notable improvement.03 Secondary strip belt
Buildings 15 02166 i008
Overall low ventilation; slight improvement in street-facing pockets.03 Strip point groupings
Buildings 15 02166 i009
Narrow gaps limit internal airflow.
Note: Dark blue denotes low-wind areas, red–yellow denotes high-wind areas, and green denotes areas with comfortable wind environments; the proposed dominant wind direction is southeast; the site selected is along Xixiang Street in Bao’an District, Shenzhen City, China.
Table 4. Architectural spatial archetypes and images of urban villages.
Table 4. Architectural spatial archetypes and images of urban villages.
Type 1 Architectural FaçadeType 2 Fifth ElevationType 3 Vertical Space
01
Door and
window
structures
Buildings 15 02166 i01001
Low-rise
street level
Buildings 15 02166 i01101
Architectural
crevices
Buildings 15 02166 i012
02
Complex materials
Buildings 15 02166 i01302
Mid-rise rooftop
Buildings 15 02166 i01402
Architectural
corridors
Buildings 15 02166 i015
03
Living facilities
Buildings 15 02166 i01603
Side terrace
Buildings 15 02166 i017
Note: The site is located in the area of Xixiang Street in Bao’an District, Shenzhen City, China.
Table 5. Archetypes, characteristics, and forms of public spaces in urban villages.
Table 5. Archetypes, characteristics, and forms of public spaces in urban villages.
ArchetypesCharacteristicsForms
Type 1
Parks
Enhanced internal airflow;
shading limits climate impacts on surrounding areas
Low-density green space
High-density yard areas
Single-sided open parks
Type 2
Streets
Narrow, sheltered;
dense facades restrict airflow
Staggered alleys
Crossroad alleys
Bilateral alleys
Type 3
Corner courtyards
Limited climate control;
moderate airflow advantages
Internal courtyards
Street-side courtyards
Corner spaces
Table 6. Public space archetypes and wind environment characteristics in urban villages.
Table 6. Public space archetypes and wind environment characteristics in urban villages.
Type 1 ParksType 2 StreetsType 3 Corner Courtyards
01 Low-density green space
Buildings 15 02166 i018
(1) Overall well-ventilated environment.
(2) Limited shading from surrounding buildings.
01 Staggered
alleys
Buildings 15 02166 i019
(1) Streets and alleys are folded.
(2) Airflow is impeded.
01 Internal
courtyards
Buildings 15 02166 i020
(1) Sheltered by dense outer buildings.
(2) Near-wind zone.
02 High-density
yards areas
Buildings 15 02166 i021
(1) High-density surrounding buildings.
(2) Open spaces with high winds.
02 Crossroad
alleyways
Buildings 15 02166 i022
(1) Few shaded roads and with openings at crossroads.
(2) Improved wind environment at local street corners.
02 Street-side
courtyards
Buildings 15 02166 i023
(1) Embedded within building zones.
(2) Often aligned with the dominant wind direction.
(3) Wind often guided through these areas.
03 Single-sided
open parks Buildings 15 02166 i024
(1) Openings on the windward side.
(2) An overall suitable wind environment.
03 Bilateral
alleyways
Buildings 15 02166 i025
(1) Unidirectional roads.
(2) Dense and cluttered buildings on both sides.
(3) Poor overall ventilation.
03 Corner
Spaces
Buildings 15 02166 i026
(1) Complicated wind environment.
(2) Good overall wind environment.
(3) High winds often form.
Note: Dark blue indicates low-wind areas, red to yellow denotes high-wind areas, and green denotes areas with comfortable wind environments; the proposed dominant wind direction is southeast; the study site is located in the area of Xixiang Street in Bao’an District, Shenzhen City, China.
Table 7. Planar density and vertical height of vegetation in urban areas and their respective impacts.
Table 7. Planar density and vertical height of vegetation in urban areas and their respective impacts.
Type 1 Planar Density
01
Classification
02
Coverage
03
Example situation
04
Shading effect
05
Transpiration
06
Impact on the wind-heated environment
High densityGreater than 80%Buildings 15 02166 i027Provides a large area of shade, effectively reducing the ground temperature.Strong transpiration increases air humidity.Regulating the temperature of the zone wind environment also has the potential to block the flow of natural air.
Medium density50–80%Buildings 15 02166 i028Provides an appropriate amount of shade while allowing some sunlight to reach the ground.Transpiration is moderate and helps regulate local climate, but not as significantly as high-density vegetation.It has a certain effect on guiding and changing the wind direction.
Low densityBelow 50%Buildings 15 02166 i029Provides less shade, with limited effect on reducing ground temperatures.Transpiration is relatively weak, contributing minimally to increasing air humidity.It has a small impact on wind speed but has a moderating effect on the comfort of the wind environment in the surrounding residential areas.
Type2 Vertical Height
01
Classification
02
Height
03
Example situation
04
Vegetation type
05
Function
06
Impact
High-level
vegetation
Taller than 5 metersBuildings 15 02166 i030Tall treesForms a cool canopy layer to provide extensive shade.The canopy layer can significantly reduce the temperature of the area below, minimize heat accumulation, and provide a cool environment for people.
Middle-level
vegetation
Between 1 and 5 metersBuildings 15 02166 i031Medium-height shrubs and smaller treesProvides shaded areas, blocking some direct sunlight from reaching the ground and buildings.Reduce the heat load from direct sunlight, lower the temperature of the surrounding environment, and enhance the comfort of the shaded areas.
Low-level
vegetation
Below
1 meter
Buildings 15 02166 i032Ground cover plants, herbaceous plants, and low shrubsProvide ground coverage to reduce the amount of heat reflected from the ground.By the blocking of direct sunlight, the surface temperature is reduced, and the transfer of heat to the surrounding environment is decreased, thereby improving thermal comfort.
Table 8. Impact of vegetation density and height on urban wind.
Table 8. Impact of vegetation density and height on urban wind.
Type 1 Planar Density
High DensityMedium DensityLow Density
01 Layout features04 Comparison01 Layout features04 Comparison01 Layout features04 Comparison
Buildings 15 02166 i033(1) High vegetation density can significantly obstruct wind flow, thereby exacerbating the deterioration of the wind environment within settlements.Buildings 15 02166 i034(1) Medium-density plantings have a limited impact on wind speed in relatively wide lanes.
(2) In narrower areas, vegetation can obstruct wind flow.
(3) In confined spaces, vegetation may partially alter the direction of wind flow.
Buildings 15 02166 i035(1) Low-density spot planting can help regulate wind speed and alter flow direction in specific areas.
(2) It also contributes to mitigating high-velocity wind phenomena induced by building layout.
02 Vegetated02 Vegetated02 Vegetated
Buildings 15 02166 i036Buildings 15 02166 i037Buildings 15 02166 i038
03 Non-vegetated03 Non-vegetated03 Non-vegetated
Buildings 15 02166 i039Buildings 15 02166 i040Buildings 15 02166 i041
Type 2 Vertical Height
High-Level VegetationMiddle-Level VegetationLow-Level Vegetation
01 Layout features04 Comparison01 Layout features04 Comparison01 Layout features04 Comparison
Buildings 15 02166 i042(1) The elevated vegetation zone along the lakefront exerts a slight decelerating effect on wind speeds across the roadway; however, its influence on the wind environment surrounding buildings located farther inland is minimal to negligible.Buildings 15 02166 i043(1) Vegetation of medium height situated in relatively open areas exerts minimal influence on wind speed.
(2) Conversely, vegetation surrounding the perimeter of adjacent buildings facilitates the formation of an extended area of reduced wind velocity on one side.
Buildings 15 02166 i044(1) Lower vegetation belts in the landscape can moderately enhance regional wind speeds.
02 Vegetated02 Vegetated02 Vegetated
Buildings 15 02166 i045Buildings 15 02166 i046Buildings 15 02166 i047
03 Non-vegetated03 Non-vegetated03 Non-vegetated
Buildings 15 02166 i048Buildings 15 02166 i049Buildings 15 02166 i050
Note: The six spatial prototypes are all derived from the site, so the single relationship between the different densities and heights of the vegetation layout and the wind environment of the current high-density old area is explored more here.
Table 9. Specific strategies and regulatory roles in the planning and rehabilitation of high-density urban villages.
Table 9. Specific strategies and regulatory roles in the planning and rehabilitation of high-density urban villages.
Levels of StrategyStrategic
Approaches
Specific
Practices
Thermal Comfort Improvement
01
Neighborhood Level
(1) Rationally use terrain.Expand the ventilation corridors in the windward direction, leveraging terrain and natural features.Mitigate the overall UHI effect in the area.
(2) Demolish old and outdated buildings.Demolish old buildings and building features located in potential wind corridors.
(3) Expand the width of the ventilation corridors.Expand the width of the ventilation corridors in the direction of the prevailing wind.
(4) Adjust the building density.Adjust the high-density, low-rise layout to a high-rise, low-density layout.
02
Residential Unit Level
(1) Optimize the building layout structure.Modify the row layout for buildings that border open areas and stagger the layout for adjacent buildings.Enhance the heat dissipation in residential units.
Improve the internal thermal environment of buildings.
(2) Optimize the building layout orientation.Reasonably design the building layout orientation according to the dominant wind direction.
(3) Increase the size and number of public spaces.Remove some buildings in high-density areas and increase point-based open spaces.
03
Building Unit Level
(1) Optimize the building materials.Optimize the surface of the building materials to reduce the surface roughness.Reduce temperatures on the building surface.
(2) Optimize the building form.Adopt more streamlined designs.
(3) Enhance the building ventilation.Install ventilation on elevated floors to guide wind flows through the buildings.
(4) Optimize the building design.Ensure that the building podium overlaps with the main body of the building.
(5) Increase greenery on the building surfaces.Increase the amount of greenery on rooftops or facades of buildings.
Note: Strategy illustrations were created by the author.
Table 10. Specific landscape intervention strategies and moderating effects in high-density urban villages.
Table 10. Specific landscape intervention strategies and moderating effects in high-density urban villages.
Main Retrofit
Strategies
Specific
Measures
Wind Environment
Regulation
Thermal Comfort
Improvement
1. Regional planning level
Optimizing
ecological
nodes
(1) Restore environmental quality at damaged ecological nodes.(1) Optimize the local wind environment.(1) Isolating heat islands, promoting temperature exchange between the internal spaces and localized “cold islands” in the peripheral areas, and improving the overall thermal environment within the urban areas.
(2) Establish key ecological nodes such as eco-parks, nature reserves, and nature conservation buffer zones.
Constructing
ecological
corridors
(1) Optimize the layout of the green spaces in the direction of the unventilated corridors and increase the vegetation coverage to the greatest extent.(2) Ensure the directional continuity of the ventilation corridors to support cold air circulation.
(2) Improve river channels, integrate shoreline resources, and increase the width of greenways.
Build
an ecological
network
(1) Enhance the areas of ecological corridors and the transitions between ecological corridors.(3) Form an overall ventilation network.
(2) Enhance the penetration and connection of ecological corridors and the transitions between corridors.
(3) Strengthen the green infrastructure and ecological isolation zones.
2. Neighborhood improvement level
Community
parks
(1) Support reasonable, dense planting.(1) Increase the areas of shaded surfaces.
(2) Increase the water content of the air.
(1) Utilize the shaded surfaces of plants and buildings to enhance thermal comfort.
(2) Utilize the evaporation of
water vapor to lower the ambient temperature.
(2) Set up pavilions, umbrellas, and rest areas and plant tall shade trees.
(3) Conduct artificial cooling with water from sprinkler irrigation.
Waterfront
green
spaces
(1) Utilize terrain to guide wind direction.(1) Direct winds to increase wind flows.(1) Reduce the area of sunlight absorption, reduce the temperature of water surfaces, and better utilize thermal regulation by water bodies.
(2) Establish tall plants along rivers.
(3) Build ecological green islands.
Street
spaces
(1) Incorporate green concepts into the design of street layouts; ecological planting in public areas.(1) Direct winds to create neighborhood cold corridors.
(2) Utilize the moderating effect of plants to create localized microclimates.
(1) Enhance the thermal comfort of the travel corridors and recreational areas.
(2) Green the facades of buildings and plant trees along streets.
(3) Avoid bare and impermeable land areas.
(4) Adopt specific layouts for leisure, sport, and fitness facilities, surrounded by plants.
(5) Reasonably arrange bus stops and rest areas.
Pocket
green
spaces
(1) Establish a regular, block-based layout of small green spaces.(1) Create localized islands.
(2) Regulate the circulation of cold air.
(1) Reduce building temperatures.
(2) Build cool spaces.
(2) Plant tall shade trees.
(3) Add water features.
(4) Install cooling pavement.
Rooftop
green
spaces
(1) Roof gardens.
(2) Rooftop farms.
(3) Eco-paving.
Note: Strategy illustrations were created by the author.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, J.; Xu, X.; Jiang, J. Optimizing Public Space Quality in High-Density Old Districts of Asian Megacities: Thermal Environment Analysis of Shenzhen’s Urban Fringe. Buildings 2025, 15, 2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132166

AMA Style

Ren J, Xu X, Jiang J. Optimizing Public Space Quality in High-Density Old Districts of Asian Megacities: Thermal Environment Analysis of Shenzhen’s Urban Fringe. Buildings. 2025; 15(13):2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132166

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Jie, Xiaohui Xu, and Jielong Jiang. 2025. "Optimizing Public Space Quality in High-Density Old Districts of Asian Megacities: Thermal Environment Analysis of Shenzhen’s Urban Fringe" Buildings 15, no. 13: 2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132166

APA Style

Ren, J., Xu, X., & Jiang, J. (2025). Optimizing Public Space Quality in High-Density Old Districts of Asian Megacities: Thermal Environment Analysis of Shenzhen’s Urban Fringe. Buildings, 15(13), 2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132166

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop