Bond–Slip Performance between Steel Tube and Self-Compacting Fly Ash Concrete
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Test Overview
2.1. Test Materials and Mix Design
2.2. Test Method and Loading System
3. Experimental Results and Analysis
3.1. Failure Pattern
3.2. Load–Slip Curves
- (1)
- The P–S curves of the tests display clear peak load points and exhibit similar patterns until reaching the peak load. The relationship between load and displacement remains mainly linear. Upon reaching the peak load, the specimens experience a sudden drop, with the exception of FA40-Z and FA60-Z. It is important to note the significant slip at the loading end. The load–slip curves of FA40-C and SCC40-C contrast noticeably with those of FA40-Z and FA40-G. Once FA40-C and SCC40-C reach the peak load, there is a sharp decrease in load, followed by a rapid decline. This decrease is due to the evident reduction in load after the chemical bonding force between the FASCC and steel tube is disrupted. Consequently, the mechanical bite force and friction force become active despite their relatively minor magnitudes. Due to the restraint effect of the steel tube on the inner concrete, the FA40-C, FA60-C, and SCC40-C specimens without structural measures have similar properties.
- (2)
- Specimens featuring longitudinal rib structures show enhanced bonding performance. Samples with longitudinal ribs offer clear benefits, displaying substantially higher maximum loads in comparison to other specimens. The FA40-Z specimen shows a maximum load that is 25.6% and 53.7% higher than the FA40-G and FA40-C specimens, respectively. Moreover, there is an increase in strength retention rate during the later loading stages.
- (3)
- The P–S curves display unique features. Initially, the chemical cementation force acts on the contact surface between the FASCC and steel tube, preventing any slippage. With increasing displacement, the chemical bond force decreases until the initial slip occurs at the loading end, marking the transition to the second stage. At the slip position, the chemical bond force no longer exists, while it persists at the non-slip position. Meanwhile, the mechanical resistance force between the FASCC and the steel tube remains in effect. During this stage, the load–slip curves show a linear increase. As the free end slips, the curves enter the third stage. At this juncture, the interface chemical bond force vanishes, leaving the bond force solely composed of the mechanical resistance force and interface friction resistance.
3.3. Analysis of DIC Strain Nephrogram
- (1)
- The DIC strain cloud diagram offers a straightforward depiction of the variations in surface strain on steel tubes throughout various loading phases. Both the FA SCCFST and the traditional SCCFST show comparable patterns of strain evolution for the steel tube. Initially, the longitudinal strain values at different measuring points on the steel tube are relatively minimal, and this strain progressively increases in a linear fashion with the escalation of the load level.
- (2)
- With the increase in load, the longitudinal strain at all measurement points gradually increases. It is noteworthy that the rate of concrete stress growth at the free end is considerably higher than that at the loading end. This suggests that the interface at the loading end experiences slippage before the free end. Throughout the loading process, the strain distribution of the steel tube stays consistent, indicating that the bond between the steel tube and SCC remains unbroken, albeit somewhat compromised.
4. Analysis of Bond Strength and Influence Factors
4.1. Calculation of Bond Strength
- (1)
- The adhesive strength of the FASCC increases while the internal structures remain unchanged, leading to a notable enhancement in the adhesive strength of the FA SCCFST columns. This improvement is mainly due to the reduced shrinkage of FASCC with higher strength grades, consequently reinforcing the mechanical grip and chemical adhesion between FASCC and steel tubes.
- (2)
- While the P–S curves of specimens FA40-C and FA60-C show similarities, there is a significant difference in bond strength of 0.59 MPa. On the other hand, the bond strength variance between FA40-Z and FA60-Z specimens is 0.44 MPa, indicating a noteworthy increase of 21.7%. However, when compared to the non-structural specimens, the bond strength decreases by 5.4% and 10.5%, respectively, due to the inclusion of the longitudinal rib area in the calculation. This illustrates that the longitudinal rib structure enhances the overall stability of the specimen, making buckling failure less likely under heavy loads. The internal structures effectively minimize the relative sliding between FASCC and the steel tube.
- (3)
- The contact area between FASCC and the steel tube expands due to the inner structures, thereby enhancing the mechanical bite force and friction resistance. These enhancements are closely linked with the mechanical properties and surface friction resistance of FASCC.
4.2. Gap between the Test and Engineering Application
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The load–slip curves obtained from tests on the steel tube and FASCC of varying strength grades display consistent patterns. Prior to reaching the peak load, there is a linear relationship between load and displacement. Post-peak load, the curves diverge into two categories, namely sudden drop and gradual drop.
- (2)
- The strain behavior of FA SCCFST and conventional SCCFST follows similar trends. The DIC strain cloud image effectively captures variations in surface strain of the steel tube at different loading phases. Strain on the steel tube at the measuring point incrementally rises with increasing load. The strain growth rate at the free end outpaces that at the loaded end.
- (3)
- The bonding performance at the interface of FA SCCFST improves as the strength of the inner concrete increases. In comparison to FA40-G and FA40-C, the peak load of FA40-Z rose by 26.4% and 55.7%, respectively, while the bond strength decreased by 29.5% and 5.4%, respectively. The longitudinal ribs significantly enhance the overall stability and diminish the risk of buckling failure, demonstrating that internal structures effectively prevent sliding between the steel tube and FASCC. These research findings can serve as guidance for designing engineering structures in this field.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, D.; Wu, C.; Song, H.; Li, L.; Lv, G.; Yang, F. Experimental Investigation and analysis of bond–slip behavior between geopolymer concrete and steel tube with varying structural measures. Buildings 2024, 14, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, M.; Dey, S.; Rao, B. Characterization of fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete by fly ash and cement. Chem. Inorg. Mater. 2023, 1, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Xu, K.; Xiao, W.; Nie, W.; Zhou, J.; Luo, J.; Zhang, M.; Liu, X. Study on the bonding properties of reinforced reef limestone concrete and its influencing factors. Buildings 2024, 14, 2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hui, C.; Li, Y.; Li, K.; Liu, C.; Hai, R.; Li, C. Experimental investigation and analysis on the axial compressive performance of recycled concrete-filled corroded steel tubular columns. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2022, 22, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Ding, F.; Cai, C. Experimental behavior of circular concrete-filled steel tube stub columns. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2007, 63, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, P.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, C.; Wang, J.; Gu, J. The harmless and value-added utilization of red mud: Recovering iron from red mud by pyrometallurgy and preparing cementitious materials with its tailings. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2024, 132, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Q.; Ding, Z.; Liao, W. Effective elastic properties of irregular auxetic structures. Compos. Struct. 2022, 287, 115269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roeder, C.; Cameron, B.; Brown, C. Composite action in concrete filled tubes. J. Struct. Eng. 1999, 125, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.T.; Xu, J.J.; Chen, Z.P.; Li, Y.; Liang, Y. Mechanical research on bond-slip behaviors of recycled aggregate concrete-filled square steel tubes. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2012, 166, 3233–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Dai, J.; Jin, Q.; Chen, L.; Liu, X. Refining bond–slip constitutive relationship between checkered steel tube and concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 79, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, M.; Lai, Z.; Xiao, Q.; Du, H.; Zhang, K. Bond behavior of concrete-filled steel tube columns using manufactured sand (MS-CFT). Eng. Struct. 2019, 187, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aly, T.; Elchalakani, M.; Thayalan, P.; Patnaikuni, I. Incremental collapse threshold for pushout resistance of circular concrete filled steel tubular columns. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2010, 66, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunaiti, Y. Bond strength in battened composite columns. J. Struct. Eng. 1991, 117, 699–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wang, R.; Zhao, H.; Chen, M.-T.; Lam, D. Bond behaviour of round-ended recycled aggregate concrete filled steel tube (RE-RACFST) columns. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2023, 201, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, Z.; Song, T.-Y.; Uy, B.; Han, L.-H. Bond behavior in concrete-filled steel tubes. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2016, 120, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Feng, R.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, X. Bond-slip behaviour of concrete-filled stainless steel circular hollow section tubes. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2017, 130, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, H.; Usami, T. Strength of concrete-filled thin-walled steel box columns: Experiment. J. Struct. Eng. 1992, 118, 3036–3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrus, C.; Hamid, H.A.; Ibrahim, A.; Parke, G. Experimental behaviour of concrete filled thin walled steel tubes with tab stiffeners. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2010, 66, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, H.; Chen, X.; Cao, W.; Zhao, Y. Bond-slip behavior of large high-strength concrete-filled circular steel tubes with different constructions. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2020, 167, 105951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouzoubaa, N.; Lachemi, M. Self-compacting concrete incorporating high volumes of class F fly ash: Preliminary results. Cement Concrete Res. 2001, 31, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, J.; Ding, Y. An experimental study on the workability of self-compacting lightweight concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 2087–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, Y.; Zeng, J.; Li, L.; Kwan, A. Influence of concrete mix proportions on axial performance of concrete-filled steel tubes made with self-compacting concrete. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2020, 23, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Q.; Tao, Z.; Wu, Y. Experimental behaviour of high performance concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Thin-Walled Struct. 2008, 46, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, S. Bond behavior of steel fibers reinforced self-stressing and self-compacting concrete filled steel tube columns. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 158, 894–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, H. Push-out tests of CFST columns strengthened with self-compacting and self-stressing concrete filled square steel tube. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2022, 193, 107263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ke, X.; Tang, Z.K.; Tao, Y.Y. Experimental investigation on bond-slip behavior of self-compacting rubberized concrete-filled steel tubes. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2023, 37, 503–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, X.; Liu, Q. Bond strength between steel and self-compacting lower expansion concrete in composite columns. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2017, 139, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, D.; Zhou, X.; Du, X.; Wang, G. A 3D fractional elastoplastic constitutive model for concrete material. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2019, 26, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Lu, D.; Du, X.; Wang, G.; Meng, F. A 3D non-orthogonal plastic damage model for concrete. Comput. Method Appl. 2020, 360, 112716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Z.; Li, C.; Qiao, P. Experimental investigation on the bond performance of sea sand coral concrete with FRP bar reinforcement for marine environments. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2022, 26, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB 50017-2017; Steel Structure Design Standard. China Planning Press: Beijing, China, 2017.
- ANSI/AISC 360-10; Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction: Chicago, IL, USA, 2010.
- BS 5400-5: 2005; Steel Concrete and Composite Bridges-Part 5: Code of Practice for the Design of Composite Bridges. British Standard Institute: London, UK, 2005.
- AS5100.6-2004; Bridge Design, Part 6: Steel and Composite Construction. Standards Australia: Sydney, Australia, 2004.
- Eurocode 4 (EC4); Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures Part1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
Specimens | Concrete Grades | Concrete | L/mm | d/mm | t/mm | Inner Structure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA40-C | C40 | FASCC | 350 | 219 | 4 | — |
FA40-Z | C40 | FASCC | 350 | 219 | 4 | Longitudinal rib |
FA40-G | C40 | FASCC | 350 | 219 | 4 | Stud |
SCC40-C | C40 | Ordinary SCC | 350 | 219 | 4 | — |
FA60-C | C60 | FASCC | 350 | 219 | 4 | — |
FA60-Z | C60 | FASCC | 350 | 219 | 4 | Longitudinal rib |
Test Specimen | Water Cement Ratio | Cement | Fly Ash | Coarse Aggregate | Fine Aggregate | Water | Water Reducing Admixture |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC40 | 0.37 | 486.5 | — | 950 | 809.6 | 180 | 4.87 |
FA40 | 0.37 | 291.9 | 194.6 | 950 | 809.6 | 180 | 4.87 |
FA60 | 0.31 | 309.6 | 206.4 | 909 | 774 | 160 | 7.74 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hui, C.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, S.; Wu, H.; Hai, R. Bond–Slip Performance between Steel Tube and Self-Compacting Fly Ash Concrete. Buildings 2024, 14, 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092825
Hui C, Zhang Y, Lei S, Wu H, Hai R. Bond–Slip Performance between Steel Tube and Self-Compacting Fly Ash Concrete. Buildings. 2024; 14(9):2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092825
Chicago/Turabian StyleHui, Cun, Yihao Zhang, Shijie Lei, Haipeng Wu, and Ran Hai. 2024. "Bond–Slip Performance between Steel Tube and Self-Compacting Fly Ash Concrete" Buildings 14, no. 9: 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092825
APA StyleHui, C., Zhang, Y., Lei, S., Wu, H., & Hai, R. (2024). Bond–Slip Performance between Steel Tube and Self-Compacting Fly Ash Concrete. Buildings, 14(9), 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092825