Building Information Modeling—Empowering Construction Projects with End-to-End Life Cycle Management
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology
3.1. Pilot Survey
EFA Analysis
3.2. Main Questionnaire
3.2.1. PLS-SEM Factor Analysis
3.2.2. Structural Model Analysis
3.2.3. Predictive Relevance
4. Results
4.1. Demographic Details
4.2. EFA Analysis
4.3. PLS Algorithm Analytical Analysis
4.4. Model Structural Analysis
4.5. Predictive Relevance
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Correction Statement
Appendix A
Survey Questionnaire |
Q1: What is your profession
|
Please indicate your agreement with factors that according to you are significant in affecting the BIM adoption in empowering construction projects from end-to-end life cycle management. | ||||||
Question # | Questions | Strongly Disagree (1) | Disagree (2) | Neutral (3) | Agree (4) | Strongly Agree (5) |
1 | Increased Cooperation | |||||
2 | Improved Visualization | |||||
3 | Conflict Detection | |||||
4 | Efficient Project Management | |||||
5 | Estimation and Analysis of Costs | |||||
6 | Facility Administration and Maintenance | |||||
7 | Sustainability and Energy Analysis | |||||
8 | Construction Sequencing and Phasing for Prefabricated and Off-Site Construction | |||||
9 | Optimization of Maintenance and Operations | |||||
10 | Integration and Interoperability of Data | |||||
11 | Compliance with Regulations and Documentation | |||||
12 | Monitoring the Performance of the Facility | |||||
13 | Value of Long-Term Assets | |||||
14 | Continuous Enhancement and Learned Lessons | |||||
15 | Resource Planning and Management | |||||
16 | Participant Involvement Facility Expansion and Renovation | |||||
17 | Clash Resolution and Construction Readiness Evaluation | |||||
18 | Training and Simulation | |||||
19 | Asset Monitoring and Inventory Control | |||||
20 | Compliance Reporting and Management | |||||
21 | Remote Collaboration and Electronic Conferences | |||||
22 | Continuous Maintenance and Monitoring | |||||
23 | Management of Knowledge and Lessons Learned | |||||
24 | Risk Management |
References
- Codinhoto, R.; Kiviniemi, A. BIM for FM: A Case Support for Business Life Cycle. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, Yokohama, Japan, 7–9 July 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaaron, A.A.M.; Hijazi, I.H.; Musleh, K.I.Y. A Conceptual Model for Adoption of BIM in Construction Projects: ADKAR as an Integrative Model of Change Management. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2022, 34, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, M.F.; Esmanioto, F.; Huber, N.; Loures, E.R.; Canciglieri, O. A Systematic Literature Review of Interoperability in the Green Building Information Modeling Lifecycle. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 223, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GhaffarianHoseini, A.; Zhang, T.; Nwadigo, O.; GhaffarianHoseini, A.; Naismith, N.; Tookey, J.; Raahemifar, K. Application of ND BIM Integrated Knowledge-Based Building Management System (BIM-IKBMS) for Inspecting Post-Construction Energy Efficiency. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 72, 935–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgiadou, M.C. An Overview of Benefits and Challenges of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Adoption in UK Residential Projects. Constr. Innov. 2019, 19, 298–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqar, A.; Othman, I.; Shafiq, N.; Mansoor, M.S. Applications of AI in Oil and Gas Projects towards Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqar, A.; Khan, M.B.; Shafiq, N.; Skrzypkowski, K.; Zagórski, K.; Zagórska, A. Assessment of Challenges to the Adoption of IOT for the Safety Management of Small Construction Projects in Malaysia: Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqar, A.; Qureshi, A.H.; Alaloul, W.S. Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) Deployment in Small Construction Projects: Malaysian Construction Industry. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S. Barriers to Implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) to the Construction Industry: A Review. J. Civ. Eng. Constr. 2018, 7, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, S.; Liu, C.; Guan, X.; Wu, H.; Zeng, D.; Guo, J. Bidirectional Interaction between BIM and Construction Processes Using a Multisource Geospatial Data Enabled Point Cloud Model. Autom. Constr. 2022, 134, 104096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abrishami, S.; Martín-Durán, R. Bim and Dfma: A Paradigm of New Opportunities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahruddin, S.; Zairul, M. BIM Requirements across a Construction Project Lifecycle: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. 2020, 12, 569–590. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, K.; Long, Y.; Chen, B.; Chen, S.; Luo, Z. The BIM Lifecycle Management of Manufacturing Cultural Heritage Projects. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2022, 2261, 012017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qing, L.; Tao, G.; Ping, W.J. Study on Building Lifecycle Information Management Platform Based on BIM. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2014, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhamami, A.; Petri, I.; Rezgui, Y.; Kubicki, S. Promoting Energy Efficiency in the Built Environment through Adapted BIM Training and Education. Energies 2020, 13, 2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitiello, U.; Ciotta, V.; Salzano, A.; Asprone, D.; Manfredi, G.; Cosenza, E. BIM-Based Approach for the Cost-Optimization of Seismic Retrofit Strategies on Existing Buildings. Autom. Constr. 2019, 98, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbarieh, A.; Jayasinghe, L.B.; Waldmann, D.; Teferle, F.N. BIM-Based End-of-Lifecycle Decision Making and Digital Deconstruction: Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suliyanti, W.N.; Sari, R.F. Blockchain-Based Implementation of Building Information Modeling Information Using Hyperledger Composer. Sustainability 2021, 13, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Li, P.; Wang, F.; Osmani, M.; Demian, P. Building Information Modeling (BIM) Driven Carbon Emission Reduction Research: A 14-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olawumi, T.O.; Chan, D.W.M. Building Information Modelling and Project Information Management Framework for Construction Projects. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2018, 25, 53–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Xiong, F.; Olawumi, T.O.; Dong, N.; Chan, A.P.C. Conceptual Framework and Roadmap Approach for Integrating BIM into Lifecycle Project Management. J. Manag. Eng. 2018, 34, 05018011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hull, J.; Ewart, I.J. Conservation Data Parameters for BIM-Enabled Heritage Asset Management. Autom. Constr. 2020, 119, 103333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamal Hasni, M.I.A.; Ismail, Z.; Hashim, N. Contractual Aspects in the Utilisation of Level Two Building Information Modelling (BIM) within Malaysian Public Construction Projects. MATEC Web Conf. 2019, 266, 05002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinade, O.O.; Oyedele, L.O.; Ajayi, S.O.; Bilal, M.; Alaka, H.A.; Owolabi, H.A.; Arawomo, O.O. Designing out Construction Waste Using BIM Technology: Stakeholders’ Expectations for Industry Deployment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Yuan, J.; Tang, M.; Xu, Z.; Xu, W.; Cheng, Y. Developing a BIM-Enabled Building Lifecycle Management System for Owners: Architecture and Case Scenario. Autom. Constr. 2021, 129, 103814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanni, M.; Sharpe, T.; Lammers, P.; Arnold, L.; Pickard, J. Developing a Methodology for Integration of Whole Life Costs into BIM Processes to Assist Design Decision Making. Buildings 2019, 9, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tedonchio, C.T.; Nadeau, S.; Boton, C.; Rivest, L. Digital Mock-Ups as Support Tools for Preventing Risks Related to Energy Sources in the Operation Stage of Industrial Facilities through Design. Results Eng. 2022, 16, 100690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilge, E.C.; Yaman, H. Information Management Roles in Real Estate Development Lifecycle: Literature Review on BIM and IPD Framework. Constr. Innov. 2021, 21, 723–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akram, R.; Thaheem, M.J.; Khan, S.; Nasir, A.R.; Maqsoom, A. Exploring the Role of BIM in Construction Safety in Developing Countries: Toward Automated Hazard Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqar, A.; Almujibah, H. Factors Influencing Adoption of Digital Twin Advanced Technologies for Smart City Development: Evidence from Malaysia. Buildings 2023, 13, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Y.; Tian, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, H. From Sketch BIM to Design BIM: An Element Identification Approach Using Industry Foundation Classes and Object Recognition. Build. Environ. 2021, 188, 107423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Kamaruzzaman, S.N.; Aziz, N.M. Green Building Construction: A Systematic Review of BIM Utilization. Buildings 2022, 12, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqar, A.; Othman, I. Impact of 3D Printing on the Overall Project Success of Residential Construction Projects Using Structural Equation Modelling. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Meng, X.; Zhu, X. Improving Knowledge Capture and Retrieval in the BIM Environment: Combining Case-Based Reasoning and Natural Language Processing. Autom. Constr. 2022, 139, 104317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajjad, M.; Hu, A.; Waqar, A.; Falqi, I.I.; Alsulamy, S.H.; Bageis, A.S.; Alshehri, A.M. Evaluation of the Success of Industry 4.0 Digitalization Practices for Sustainable Construction Management: Chinese Construction Industry. Buildings 2023, 13, 1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, K.; Kim, J.W.; Ju, K.B.; An, Y.K. Infrastructure BIM Platform for Lifecycle Management. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatmoko, J.U.D.; Fundra, Y.; Wibowo, M.A. Zhabrinna Investigating Building Information Modelling (BIM) Adoption in Indonesia Construction Industry. MATEC Web Conf. 2019, 258, 02006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bansal, V.K. Integrated Framework of BIM and GIS Applications to Support Building Lifecycle: A Move toward ND Modeling. J. Archit. Eng. 2021, 27, 05021009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, J.R.; Sadeghifam, A.N.; Joo, M.S. The Barrier Factors to the Implementation of Building Information Modelling for Construction Industry in Sarawak. Civ. Sustain. Urban Eng. 2022, 2, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charef, R. Supporting Construction Stakeholders with the Circular Economy: A Trans-Scaler Framework to Understand the Holistic Approach. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 8, 100454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaqour, E.N. The Role of Implementing BIM Applications in Enhancing Project Management Knowledge Areas in Egypt. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022, 13, 101509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charef, R. The Use of Building Information Modelling in the Circular Economy Context: Several Models and a New Dimension of BIM (8D). Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 7, 100414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Sresakoolchai, J.; Zhou, Z. Sustainability-Based Lifecycle Management for Bridge Infrastructure Using 6D BIM. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Luo, H.; Xu, J. Towards Fully BIM-Enabled Building Automation and Robotics: A Perspective of Lifecycle Information Flow. Comput. Ind. 2022, 135, 103570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Chen, C.; Wu, W. Towards the Building Information Modeling-Based Capital Project Lifecycle Management in the Luxury Yacht Industry. Polish Marit. Res. 2017, 24, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.I.; Li, S.; Chen, X.; Keung, C.; Suh, M.; Kim, T.W. Evaluation Framework for BIM-Based VR Applications in Design Phase. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 2021, 8, 910–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferdosi, H.; Abbasianjahromi, H.; Banihashemi, S.; Ravanshadnia, M. BIM Applications in Sustainable Construction: Scientometric and State-of-the-Art Review. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2023, 23, 1969–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Utiome, E.; Drogemuller, R.; Docherty, M. BIM-Based Lifecycle Planning and Specifications for Sustainable Cities of the Future: A Conceptual Approach. In Proceedings of the W107 Conference: Construction in Developing Countries and Its Contribution to Sustainable Development 2014, Lagos, Nigeria, 28–30 January 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Olanrewaju, O.I.; Kineber, A.F.; Chileshe, N.; Edwards, D.J. Modelling the Impact of Building Information Modelling (Bim) Implementation Drivers and Awareness on Project Lifecycle. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charef, R.; Ganjian, E.; Emmitt, S. Socio-Economic and Environmental Barriers for a Holistic Asset Lifecycle Approach to Achieve Circular Economy: A Pattern-Matching Method. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 170, 120798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Luo, H.; Kang, S.-C.; Wang, J.; Guo, J.; Jiao, Y. Benefits of Building Information Modelling in the Project Lifecycle: Construction Projects in Asia. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2014, 11, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olanrewaju, O.I.; Kineber, A.F.; Chileshe, N.; Edwards, D.J. Modelling the Relationship between Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation Barriers, Usage and Awareness on Building Project Lifecycle. Build. Environ. 2022, 207, 108556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waqar, A.; Othman, I.; Falqi, I.I.; Almujibah, H.R.; Alshehri, A.M.; Alsulamy, S.H.; Benjeddou, O. Assessment of Barriers to Robotics Process Automation (RPA) Implementation in Safety Management of Tall Buildings. Buildings 2023, 13, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezgui, Y.; Beach, T.; Rana, O. A Governance Approach for BIM Management across Lifecycle and Supply Chains Using Mixed-Modes of Information Delivery. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2013, 19, 239–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nour, M.; Hosny, O.; Elhakeem, A. A BIM Based Energy and Lifecycle Cost Analysis/Optimization Approach. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2012, 2, 411–418. [Google Scholar]
- Motalebi, M.; Rashidi, A.; Nasiri, M.M. Optimization and BIM-Based Lifecycle Assessment Integration for Energy Efficiency Retrofit of Buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 49, 104022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, R.; Falk, V.; Hoenen, S.; Loges, S.; Stumm, S.; Blankenbach, J.; Brell-Cokcan, S.; Hildebrandt, L.; Vallée, D. Bim—Towards the Entire Lifecycle. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 2018, 13, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, G.; Li, H.; Zhang, J. A BIM-Based Value for Money Assessment in Public-Private Partnership: An Overall Review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sr. No | Factors | References |
---|---|---|
B1 | Increased Cooperation | [23,26] |
B2 | Improved Visualization | [17,28] |
B3 | Conflict Detection | [17,28] |
B4 | Efficient Project Management | [17,28] |
B5 | Estimation and Analysis of Costs | [39,40] |
B6 | Facility Administration and Maintenance | [41,42] |
B7 | Sustainability and Energy Analysis | [1,40,43] |
B8 | Construction Sequencing and Phasing for Prefabricated and Off-Site Construction | [8,11] |
B9 | Optimization of Maintenance and Operations | [2,3] |
B10 | Integration and Interoperability of Data | [8,10] |
B11 | Compliance with Regulations and Documentation | [1,11] |
B12 | Monitoring the Performance of the Facility | [12,17] |
B13 | Value of Long-Term Assets | [17,28] |
B14 | Continuous Enhancement and Learned Lessons | [12,16] |
B15 | Resource Planning and Management | [19,20] |
B16 | Participant-Involvement Facility Expansion and Renovation | [1,16] |
B17 | Clash Resolution and Construction Readiness Evaluation | [14,39] |
B18 | Training and Simulation | [44,45] |
B19 | Asset Monitoring and Inventory Control | [41,42] |
B20 | Compliance Reporting and Management | [17,28] |
B21 | Remote Collaboration and Electronic Conferences | [17,28] |
B22 | Continuous Maintenance and Monitoring | [17,28] |
B23 | Management of Knowledge and Lessons Learned | [14] |
B24 | Risk Management | [14,15] |
Category | Classification | Frequency | % |
---|---|---|---|
Profession | Architect | 17 | 9.19 |
QS | 16 | 8.65 | |
CE | 97 | 52.43 | |
M&E | 6 | 3.24 | |
PM | 39 | 21.08 | |
Others | 10 | 5.41 | |
Organization | Contractors | 93 | 50.27 |
Consultants | 78 | 42.16 | |
Clients | 14 | 7.57 | |
Malaysian Construction Industry Experience | Less than 5 Years | 61 | 32.97 |
6–10 Y | 60 | 32.43 | |
1–15 Y | 40 | 21.62 | |
16–20 Y | 15 | 8.11 | |
Over 20 Y | 9 | 4.86 | |
Knowledge about BIM | Yes | 182 | 98.38 |
No | 3 | 1.62 |
Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIM23 | 0.828 | ||||||
BIM9 | 0.802 | ||||||
BIM15 | 0.784 | ||||||
BIM21 | 0.719 | ||||||
BIM18 | 0.772 | ||||||
BIM19 | 0.723 | ||||||
BIM1 | 0.701 | ||||||
BIM22 | 0.716 | ||||||
BIM10 | 0.705 | ||||||
BIM11 | 0.665 | ||||||
BIM5 | 0.602 | ||||||
BIM13 | 0.861 | ||||||
BIM20 | 0.801 | ||||||
BIM3 | 0.761 | ||||||
BIM17 | 0.787 | ||||||
BIM12 | 0.739 | ||||||
BIM6 | 0.688 | ||||||
BIM14 | 0.841 | ||||||
BIM4 | 0.783 | ||||||
BIM2 | 0.776 | ||||||
BIM7 | 0.645 | ||||||
Eigenvalue | 4.72 | 4.21 | 3.60 | 3.06 | 2.69 | 2.29 | 2.01 |
Extraction | BIM8, BIM24, BIM16 |
Category | Code | Factors | Cronbach’s Alpha |
---|---|---|---|
Structural Management | BIM23 | Management of Knowledge and Lessons Learned | 0.825 |
BIM9 | Optimization of Maintenance and Operations | ||
BIM15 | Resource Planning and Management | ||
BIM21 | Remote Collaboration and Electronic Conferences | ||
Monitoring and Control | BIM18 | Training and Simulation | 0.813 |
BIM19 | Asset Monitoring and Inventory Control | ||
BIM1 | Increased Cooperation | ||
Continuous Integration | BIM22 | Continuous Maintenance and Monitoring | |
BIM10 | Integration and Interoperability of Data | 0.772 | |
BIM11 | Compliance with Regulations and Documentation | ||
BIM5 | Estimation and Analysis of Costs | ||
Value Management | BIM13 | Value of Long-Term Assets | 0.775 |
BIM20 | Compliance Reporting and Management | ||
BIM3 | Conflict Detection | ||
Resolution and Performance | BIM17 | Clash Resolution and Construction Readiness Evaluation | 0.792 |
BIM12 | Monitoring the Performance of the Facility | ||
BIM6 | Facility Administration and Maintenance | ||
Project Management | BIM14 | Continuous Enhancement and Learned Lessons | 0.744 |
BIM4 | Efficient Project Management | ||
Sustainability Administration | BIM2 | Improved Visualization | 0.753 |
BIM7 | Sustainability and Energy Analysis |
Category | Code | Loadings | VIF | CA | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Structural Management | BIM23 | 0.920 | 1.480 | 0.873 | 0.882 | 0.798 |
BIM9 | 0.845 | 1.486 | ||||
BIM15 | Deleted | 1.353 | ||||
BIM21 | 0.913 | 1.719 | ||||
Monitoring and Control | BIM18 | 0.859 | 1.423 | 0.806 | 0.807 | 0.720 |
BIM19 | 0.869 | 1.381 | ||||
BIM1 | 0.817 | 1.661 | ||||
Continuous Integration | BIM22 | Deleted | 2.073 | 0.721 | 0.726 | 0.641 |
BIM10 | 0.834 | 2.051 | ||||
BIM11 | 0.789 | 2.143 | ||||
BIM5 | 0.778 | 1.178 | ||||
Value Management | BIM13 | 0.810 | 2.826 | 0.731 | 0.735 | 0.674 |
BIM20 | 0.753 | 2.897 | ||||
BIM3 | 0.708 | 1.287 | ||||
Resolution and Performance | BIM17 | 0.833 | 1.381 | 0.804 | 0.811 | 0.719 |
BIM12 | 0.831 | 1.429 | ||||
BIM6 | 0.878 | 1.876 | ||||
Project Management | BIM14 | 0.896 | 2.143 | 0.701 | 0.703 | 0.761 |
BIM4 | 0.849 | 1.908 | ||||
Sustainability Administration | BIM2 | 0.922 | 1.480 | 0.844 | 0.851 | 0.865 |
BIM7 | 0.938 | 1.486 |
Constructs | CI | MC | PM | RP | SM | SA | VM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continuous Integration = CI | |||||||
Monitoring and Control = MC | 0.307 | ||||||
Project Management = PM | 0.322 | 0.293 | |||||
Resolution and Performance = RP | 0.569 | 0.433 | 0.167 | ||||
Structural Management = SM | 0.229 | 0.298 | 0.113 | 0.379 | |||
Sustainability Administration = SA | 0.261 | 0.176 | 0.187 | 0.229 | 0.221 | ||
Value Management = VM | 0.138 | 0.371 | 0.327 | 0.667 | 0.387 | 0.423 |
Constructs | CI | MC | PM | RP | SM | SA | VM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continuous Integration = CI | 0.801 | ||||||
Monitoring and Control = MC | 0.233 | 0.849 | |||||
Project Management = PM | 0.228 | 0.216 | 0.873 | ||||
Resolution and Performance = RP | 0.438 | 0.352 | 0.133 | 0.848 | |||
Structural Management = SM | 0.174 | 0.251 | −0.089 | 0.327 | 0.893 | ||
Sustainability Administration = SA | 0.206 | 0.147 | 0.144 | 0.191 | 0.188 | 0.93 | |
Value Management = VM | 0.177 | 0.28 | 0.221 | 0.144 | 0.291 | 0.308 | 0.758 |
Variables | CI | MC | PM | RP | SM | SA | VM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIM5 | 0.778 | 0.197 | 0.193 | 0.308 | 0.055 | 0.144 | 0.478 |
BIM10 | 0.834 | 0.116 | 0.185 | 0.425 | 0.15 | 0.169 | 0.81 |
BIM11 | 0.789 | 0.253 | 0.172 | 0.31 | 0.203 | 0.18 | 0.534 |
BIM18 | 0.153 | 0.859 | 0.205 | 0.256 | 0.163 | 0.102 | 0.165 |
BIM19 | 0.243 | 0.869 | 0.133 | 0.274 | 0.233 | 0.161 | 0.23 |
BIM1 | 0.193 | 0.817 | 0.212 | 0.36 | 0.237 | 0.108 | 0.307 |
BIM4 | 0.177 | 0.206 | 0.849 | 0.06 | −0.078 | 0.119 | 0.12 |
BIM14 | 0.217 | 0.174 | 0.896 | 0.163 | −0.077 | 0.131 | 0.255 |
BIM6 | 0.388 | 0.327 | 0.16 | 0.878 | 0.334 | 0.182 | 0.588 |
BIM12 | 0.344 | 0.297 | 0.064 | 0.831 | 0.234 | 0.125 | 0.511 |
BIM17 | 0.38 | 0.27 | 0.105 | 0.833 | 0.254 | 0.175 | 0.533 |
BIM21 | 0.17 | 0.194 | −0.107 | 0.334 | 0.913 | 0.172 | 0.294 |
BIM23 | 0.19 | 0.243 | −0.081 | 0.349 | 0.92 | 0.14 | 0.276 |
BIM9 | 0.101 | 0.239 | −0.046 | 0.177 | 0.845 | 0.197 | 0.202 |
BIM2 | 0.158 | 0.119 | 0.126 | 0.165 | 0.172 | 0.922 | 0.263 |
BIM7 | 0.222 | 0.152 | 0.141 | 0.188 | 0.177 | 0.938 | 0.306 |
BIM13 | 0.834 | 0.116 | 0.185 | 0.425 | 0.15 | 0.169 | 0.81 |
BIM20 | 0.382 | 0.353 | 0.152 | 0.718 | 0.271 | 0.252 | 0.753 |
BIM3 | 0.557 | 0.143 | 0.167 | 0.266 | 0.238 | 0.283 | 0.708 |
Hypothesis | Relation | (O) | (M) | SD | T Statistics | p-Values | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | CI → BIM | 0.238 | 0.237 | 0.017 | 14.268 | 0 | Accepted |
H2 | MC → BIM | 0.266 | 0.266 | 0.015 | 18.186 | 0 | Accepted |
H3 | PM → BIM | 0.247 | 0.246 | 0.011 | 22.441 | 0 | Accepted |
H4 | RP → BIM | 0.277 | 0.276 | 0.016 | 17.151 | 0 | Accepted |
H5 | SM → BIM | 0.274 | 0.274 | 0.014 | 20.004 | 0 | Accepted |
H6 | SA → BIM | 0.189 | 0.188 | 0.013 | 14.51 | 0 | Accepted |
H7 | VM → BIM | 0.161 | 0.162 | 0.015 | 10.465 | 0 | Accepted |
Predictive Relevance | SSO | SSE | Q2 (=1 − SSE/SSO) |
---|---|---|---|
Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Life Cycle Management of Construction Projects | 4320 | 3254.339 | 0.247 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Waqar, A.; Othman, I.; Hayat, S.; Radu, D.; Khan, M.B.; Galatanu, T.F.; Almujibah, H.R.; Hadzima-Nyarko, M.; Benjeddou, O. Building Information Modeling—Empowering Construction Projects with End-to-End Life Cycle Management. Buildings 2023, 13, 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082041
Waqar A, Othman I, Hayat S, Radu D, Khan MB, Galatanu TF, Almujibah HR, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Benjeddou O. Building Information Modeling—Empowering Construction Projects with End-to-End Life Cycle Management. Buildings. 2023; 13(8):2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082041
Chicago/Turabian StyleWaqar, Ahsan, Idris Othman, Saleh Hayat, Dorin Radu, Muhammad Basit Khan, Teofil Florin Galatanu, Hammad R. Almujibah, Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko, and Omrane Benjeddou. 2023. "Building Information Modeling—Empowering Construction Projects with End-to-End Life Cycle Management" Buildings 13, no. 8: 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082041
APA StyleWaqar, A., Othman, I., Hayat, S., Radu, D., Khan, M. B., Galatanu, T. F., Almujibah, H. R., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., & Benjeddou, O. (2023). Building Information Modeling—Empowering Construction Projects with End-to-End Life Cycle Management. Buildings, 13(8), 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082041