Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Seismic Analysis of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems
3. Seismic Performance Assessment
3.1. 2-Story Steel Structure-Foundation Systems
3.2. 5-Story Steel Structure-Foundation Systems
3.3. 8-Story Steel Structure-Foundation Systems
4. Discussion and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- EN1998-5. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 5: Foundations, Retaining Structures and Geotechnical Aspects; European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Stone, W.C.; Yokel, F.Y.; Celebi, M.; Hanks, T.; Leyendecker, E.V. Engineering Aspects of the September 19, 1985 Mexico Earthquake—No. Building Science Series-165; National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST: Washington, DC, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Minasidis, G.; Hatzigeorgiou, G.D.; Beskos, D.E. SSI in steel frames subjected to near-fault earthquakes. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2014, 66, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández Sola, L.R.; Tapia Hernández, E.; Dávalos Chávez, D. Respuesta inelástica de marcos de acero con interacción inercial suelo-estructura. Rev. Ing. Sísmica 2015, 92, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ayough, P.; Mohamadi, S.; Seiyed Taghia, S.A.H. Response of steel moment and braced frames subjected to near-source pulse-like ground motions by including soil-structure interaction effects. Civ. Eng. J. 2017, 3, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flogeras, A.K.; Papagiannopoulos, G.A. On the seismic response of steel buckling-restrained braced structures including soil-structure interaction. Earthq. Struct. 2017, 12, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghandil, M.; Behnamfar, F. Ductility demands on MRF structures on soft soils considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dyn. Eart Hquake Eng. 2017, 92, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shakib, H.; Homaei, F. Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of the soil-structure interaction effect on seismic response of mid-rise setback steel buildings. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2017, 15, 2827–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farhadi, N.; Saffari, H.; Torkzadeh, P. Estimation of maximum and residual inter-storey drift in steel MRF considering soil-structure interaction from fixed-base analyses. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2018, 114, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbazi, S.; Mansouri, I.; Hu, J.W.; Karami, A. Effect of soil classification on seismic behavior of SMFs considering soil-structure interaction and near-field earthquakes. Shock Vib. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- EN1998-1. EEurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings; European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- EN1997-1. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design—art 1: General rules; European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Tartaglia, R.; D’Aniello, M.; De Martino, A.; Di Lorenzo, G. Influence of EC8 rules on P-delta effects on the design and response of steel MRF. Inegneria Sismica Int. J. Earthq. Eng. 2018, 35, 104–120. [Google Scholar]
- SAP 2000. Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Structures: Version 19.0; Computers and Structures (CSI): California, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- McCormick, J.; Aburano, H.; Ikenaga, M.; Nakashima, M. Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements. In Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 12–17 October 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Nakano, Y.; Maeda, M.; Kuramotio, H.; Murakami, M. Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation of RC buildings in Japan. In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–6 August 2004. [Google Scholar]
- EN1993-1. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures—Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings; European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Costanzo, S.; D’Aniello, M.; Landolfo, R. Proposal for design rules for ductile X-CBFS in the framework of Eurocode 8. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2019, 48, 124–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mulliken, J.S.; Karabalis, D.L. Discrete model for dynamic through-the-soil coupling of 3-d foundations and structures. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1998, 27, 687–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASCE 7-16. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures; American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Reston, WV, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- ASCE 41-17. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings; American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Reston, WV, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Azad, S.K.; Topkaya, C.; Astaneh-Asl, A. Seismic behavior of concentrically braced frames designed to AISC341 and EC8 provisions. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2017, 133, 383–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costanzo, S.; Tartaglia, R.; Di Lorenzo, G.; De Martino, A. Seismic behavior of EC8-compliant moment resisting and concentrically braced frames. Buildings 2019, 9, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Millen, M.D.L.; Pampanin, S.; Cubrinovski, M.; Carr, A. Integrating soil-structure interaction within performance-based design. In Proceedings of the Annual Technical Conference of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 21–23 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
Steel Structure | Beams | Braces | Columns |
---|---|---|---|
2-story | IPE 450 | CHS 219.1 × 5.0 | HEM 320 |
5-story | IPE 500 | CHS 273.0 × 5.6 | HEM 600 |
8-story | IPE 500 | CHS 355.6 × 6.3 | HEM 700 |
Mass (Inertia) Ratio, β | Equivalent Radius, r0 | Virtual Soil Mass (Inertia), mv | Static Stiffness K | Damping C | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vertical | |||||
Horizontal | |||||
Rocking | |||||
Torsion |
Steel Structure | 1st Mode (s) | 2nd Mode (s) |
---|---|---|
2-story, soil type B (fixed base) | 0.254 | 0.236 |
2-story, soil category C | 0.569 | 0.546 |
2-story, soil category D | 0.600 | 0.578 |
5-story, soil type B (fixed base) | 0.523 | 0.474 |
5-story, soil category C | 1.264 | 1.169 |
5-story, soil category D | 1.342 | 1.283 |
8-story, soil type B (fixed base) | 0.800 | 0.749 |
8-story, soil category C | 1.289 | 1.180 |
8-story, soil category D | 1.429 | 1.333 |
No. | Earthquake, Location, Year | Recording Station | Mw |
---|---|---|---|
1. | San Fernando, (Calif.), 1971 | Pacoima Dam | 6.6 |
2. | Superstition Hills, (Calif.), 1987 | Parachute Test Site | 7.3 |
3. | Loma Prieta, (Calif.), 1989 | Los Gatos | 6.5 |
4. | Cape Mendocino, (Calif.), 1992 | Petrolia | 7.0 |
5. | Landers, (Calif.), 1992 | Lucerne Valley | 7.3 |
6. | Northridge, (Calif.), 1994 | Rinaldi Receiving St. | 6.7 |
7. | Northridge, (Calif.), 1994 | Newhall | 6.7 |
8. | Northridge, (Calif.), 1994 | Sylmar Converter St. | 6.7 |
9. | Kobe, Japan, 1995 | Takatori | 6.9 |
10. | Christchurch, New Zealand, 2011 | Resthaven | 6.3 |
Steel Structure-Foundation, θ | Number of Failures - Steel Structure | Number of Failures - Foundation |
---|---|---|
2-story, fixed, 0° | 4/10 | - |
2-story, fixed, 45° | 4/10 | - |
2-story, fixed, 90° | 5/10 | - |
2-story, soil type C, 0° | 0/10 | 0/10 |
2-story, soil type C, 45° | 0/10 | 0/10 |
2-story, soil type C, 90° | 0/10 | 0/10 |
2-story, soil type D, 0° | 0/10 | 0/10 |
2-story, soil type D, 45° | 0/10 | 0/10 |
2-story, soil type D, 90° | 0/10 | 0/10 |
Steel Structure-Foundation, θ | IDR (%) | RIDR (%) | RIDR | RRIDR |
---|---|---|---|---|
2-story, fixed, 0° | 0.62 | 0.28 | - | - |
2-story, fixed, 45° | 0.52 | 0.13 | - | - |
2-story, fixed, 90° | 0.52 | 0.07 | - | - |
2-story, soil type C, 0° | 3.22 | 0.25 | 5.19 | 0.89 |
2-story, soil type C, 45° | 3.33 | 0.25 | 6.40 | 1.92 |
2-story, soil type C, 90° | 2.50 | 0.16 | 4.81 | 2.29 |
2-story, soil type D, 0° | 3.50 | 0.39 | 5.64 | 1.39 |
2-story, soil type D, 45° | 3.41 | 0.23 | 6.56 | 1.77 |
2-story, soil type D, 90° | 2.46 | 0.13 | 4.73 | 1.86 |
Steel Structure-Foundation | Vb (kN) | Mb (kNm) | RVb | RMb |
---|---|---|---|---|
2-story, fixed | 7222 (X) 6923 (Y) | 34,740 (X) 36,950 (Y) | - | - |
2-story, soil type C | 6720 (X) 7633 (Y) | 47,220 (X) 48,740 (Y) | 0.93 (X) 1.10 (Y) | 1.36 (X) 1.32 (Y) |
2-story, soil type D | 5575 (X) 8219 (Y) | 51,130 (X) 38,750 (Y) | 0.77 (X) 1.19 (Y) | 1.47 (X) 1.05 (Y) |
Steel Structure-Foundation, θ | Number of Failures - Steel Structure | Number of Failures - Foundation |
---|---|---|
5-story, fixed, 0° | 9/10 | - |
5-story, fixed, 45° | 9/10 | - |
5-story, fixed, 90° | 9/10 | - |
5-story, soil type C, 0° | 5/10 | 0/10 |
5-story, soil type C, 45° | 6/10 | 0/10 |
5-story, soil type C, 90° | 6/10 | 0/10 |
5-story, soil type D, 0° | 7/10 | 0/10 |
5-story, soil type D, 45° | 7/10 | 0/10 |
5-story, soil type D, 90° | 7/10 | 0/10 |
Steel Structure-Foundation, θ | IDR (%) | RIDR (%) | RIDR | RRIDR |
---|---|---|---|---|
5-story, fixed, 0° | 0.51 | 0.08 | - | - |
5-story, fixed, 45° | 0.67 | 0.05 | - | - |
5-story, fixed, 90° | 0.73 | 0.04 | - | - |
5-story, soil type C, 0° | 2.10 | 0.25 | 4.12 | 3.13 |
5-story, soil type C, 45° | 2.22 | 0.44 | 3.31 | 8.80 |
5-story, soil type C, 90° | 2.69 | 0.33 | 3.68 | 8.25 |
5-story, soil type D, 0° | 3.17 | 0.18 | 6.22 | 2.25 |
5-story, soil type D, 45° | 2.38 | 0.24 | 3.55 | 4.80 |
5-story, soil type D, 90° | 2.57 | 0.41 | 3.52 | 10.25 |
Steel Structure-Foundation | Vb (kN) | Mb (kNm) | RVb | RMb |
---|---|---|---|---|
5-story, fixed | 9216 (X) 8192 (Y) | 96,750 (X) 102,100 (Y) | - | - |
5-story, soil type C | 8588 (X) 12,960 (Y) | 112,300 (X) 86,640 (Y) | 0.93 (X) 1.58 (Y) | 1.16 (X) 0.85 (Y) |
5-story, soil type D | 5920 (X) 12,820 (Y) | 111,500 (X) 71,460 (Y) | 0.64 (X) 1.56 (Y) | 1.15 (X) 0.70 (Y) |
Steel Structure-Foundation, θ | Number of Failures - Steel Structure | Number of Failures - Foundation |
---|---|---|
8-story, fixed, 0° | 9/10 | - |
8-story, fixed, 45° | 9/10 | - |
8-story, fixed, 90° | 10/10 | - |
8-story, soil type C, 0° | 6/10 | 0/10 |
8-story, soil type C, 45° | 6/10 | 0/10 |
8-story, soil type C, 90° | 6/10 | 0/10 |
8-story, soil type D, 0° | 5/10 | 0/10 |
8-story, soil type D, 45° | 7/10 | 0/10 |
8-story, soil type D, 90° | 7/10 | 0/10 |
Steel Structure-Foundation, θ | IDR (%) | RIDR (%) | RIDR | RRIDR |
---|---|---|---|---|
8-story, fixed, 0° | 0.69 | 0.05 | - | - |
8-story, fixed, 45° | 0.70 | 0.06 | - | - |
8-story, fixed, 90° | 0.70 | 0.06 | - | - |
8-story, soil type C, 0° | 2.10 | 0.12 | 3.04 | 2.40 |
8-story, soil type C, 45° | 2.19 | 0.21 | 3.13 | 3.50 |
8-story, soil type C, 90° | 2.62 | 0.31 | 3.74 | 5.17 |
8-story, soil type D, 0° | 3.35 | 0.21 | 4.86 | 3.50 |
8-story, soil type D, 45° | 3.35 | 0.38 | 4.79 | 6.33 |
8-story, soil type D, 90° | 3.27 | 0.49 | 4.67 | 8.17 |
Steel Structure-Foundation | Vb (kN) | Mb (kNm) | RVb | RMb |
---|---|---|---|---|
8-story, fixed | 17,280 (X) 8748 (Y) | 121,800 (X) 240,900 (Y) | - | - |
8-story, soil type C | 18,000 (X) 7868 (Y) | 80,650 (X) 170,700 (Y) | 1.04 (X) 0.90 (Y) | 0.66 (X) 0.71 (Y) |
8-story, soil type D | 15,450 (X) 6024 (Y) | 58,780 (X) 173,500 (Y) | 0.89 (X) 0.69 (Y) | 0.48 (X) 0.72 (Y) |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Katsimpini, P.; Konstandakopoulou, F.; Papagiannopoulos, G.; Pnevmatikos, N.; Hatzigeorgiou, G. Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions. Buildings 2020, 10, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10040063
Katsimpini P, Konstandakopoulou F, Papagiannopoulos G, Pnevmatikos N, Hatzigeorgiou G. Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions. Buildings. 2020; 10(4):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10040063
Chicago/Turabian StyleKatsimpini, Panagiota, Foteini Konstandakopoulou, George Papagiannopoulos, Nikos Pnevmatikos, and George Hatzigeorgiou. 2020. "Seismic Performance of Steel Structure-Foundation Systems Designed According to Eurocode 8 Provisions: The Case of Near-Fault Seismic Motions" Buildings 10, no. 4: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10040063