Next Article in Journal
Determination of Johnson–Cook Constitutive Parameters for Cutting Simulations
Next Article in Special Issue
Roasting Pretreatment Combined with Ultrasonic Enhanced Leaching Lead from Electrolytic Manganese Anode Mud
Previous Article in Journal
Electromagnetic Forces in Continuous Casting of Steel Slabs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Double Leached Waelz Oxide for Identification of Fluoride Mineral
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Metals 2019, 9(4), 472; https://doi.org/10.3390/met9040472

Article
Modified Leach Residues from Processing Deep-Sea Nodules as Effective Heavy Metals Adsorbents
1
Department of Metals and Corrosion Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 16628 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Interoceanmetal Joint Organization IOM, Cyryla i Metodego 9, 71-541 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 March 2019 / Accepted: 18 April 2019 / Published: 23 April 2019

Abstract

:
The possible use of leaching residue from leaching deep-sea nodules in SO2/H2SO4/H2O medium as a low-cost adsorbent of heavy metals (Pb(II), Cd(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Co(II), As(V)) was studied. The leaching residue was found to be an effective adsorbent for all of the tested elements; however, it was inactive in the solution containing As(V). The chemical activation of adsorbent in 10 vol. % HCl resulted in the greatest improvement of adsorption properties, while the activation in 10 vol. % HNO3 and heat treatment at 250 °C did not significantly affect the sorption characteristics of treated adsorbents compared with the original leaching residue. After HCl activation, the maximal adsorption capacities for lead (12.0 mg/g at pH 5.0 after 1 h), nickel (3.1 mg/g at pH 5.5 after 4 h) and cobalt (2.0 mg/g at pH 5.0 after 2 h) were achieved. Additional mechanical treatment connected with HCl activation provided the highest adsorption capacities for cadmium (11.5 mg/g at pH 4.0) and copper (5.7 mg/g at pH 4.5). Coprecipitation of Fe/Al-based particles on the surface of the leaching residue increased As(V) removal of the adsorbent. Surface coating based on AlIII was extremely effective, causing the increase of the adsorption capacity from 0 with the original leaching residue, to 28.1 mg/g (pH 7.0, 24 min). Kinetics studies showed the rapid progress of adsorption for Pb(II), Cd(II), and As(V) in tens of minutes, while the adsorption of Cu(II), Ni(II) and Co(II) approached a steady state after 2 h.
Keywords:
deep-sea nodules; leaching residue; adsorption; heavy metals

1. Introduction

Deep-sea manganese polymetallic nodules are sedimentary formations covering the bottom of many global seas and oceans. They represent a potentially important resource of strategic metals such as Ni, Cu, Co, Mn and Fe. However, the large variety of other present metals (Mo, Zn, Zr, Li, Ti, Ge, platinum group metals and rare earth elements) increases the attractiveness of nodules for industrial processing. The nodules consist mainly of amorphous oxides and oxyhydroxides of Mn, Fe, Si and Al where Fe and Mn are present in variable oxidation states [1,2].
A number of technologies have been developed for nodules treatment [3]. Hydrometallurgical processes mostly use acidic or ammoniacal reduction leaching when Cu, Ni, Co and partly Mn and Fe transfer into a solution, leaving behind leaching residue that, after additional extraction of Mn and Fe, becomes waste. Proper utilization of solid leaching residues is therefore needed to enhance the proposed technologies from the economical and environmental point of view. Nodules are characterized by high porosity and surface area, the properties that were found to be preserved or enhanced even after leaching, and therefore leaching residue is suitable as an adsorbent [4,5,6]. Its use in the treatment of industrial wastewaters containing various heavy metals might cope with conventional methods for water purification such as chemical reduction, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, coagulation, complexation, electrodeposition, solvent extraction, electrochemical treatment and adsorption on activated charcoal [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Studies on adsorption of heavy metals on deep-sea nodule leach residues have been carried out mainly in India. The residues generated by NH3-SO2 leaching of manganese nodules were successfully used as an adsorbent of Ni2+, Cr6+, Cu2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ [4,5,16,17,18], with removal efficiency strongly dependent on pH, temperature and usually initial metal ion concentration in the solution. Randhawa et al. found that manganese nodule residue obtained from reduction roasting followed by ammoniacal leaching is an acceptable adsorbent of Ni2+ with good regenerability [19]. The leach residues were also used as an effective selenite adsorbent with the best adsorption capacity at pH 5 [20,21]. Besides metals, the adsorption of phenolic compounds [22], phosphate [23,24] and dye remains [25] onto leaching residue was reported as a possible alternative of their removal from industrial effluents. In previous studies, the leached residues mainly contained Mn, Fe, Si and Al as a result of selective extraction of Ni, Co and Cu from nodules by leaching.
Researches show that effective composite adsorbents can be synthesized by forming an oxide surface coating on another supporting material, and that these composite adsorbents can be easily separated from the aqueous solution after an adsorption process. Oxides were found to have the ability to remove metals to trace concentrations, and the adsorbed metals can be recovered and reused [5]. For that purpose, Fe and Mn oxides are especially used [26,27]. Nowadays, there is an increasing tendency to employ nanostructured materials in many fields, including the removal of heavy metals from wastewater effluents, due to their unique physical, chemical and mechanical properties [28]. In comparison to microstructured adsorbents, the nanostructured adsorbents have several advantages, such as higher surface to volume ratio, or smaller quantities of produced secondary pollutants [29]. Singh et al. found that α-MnO2 nanorods and δ-MnO2 nanofibers have a high adsorption capacity for arsenite [29]. Pectin-iron oxide magnetic nanocomposite was used as an adsorbent for the removal of Cu (II) from aqueous solution [30]. Zinc (II) oxide nanorods loaded on activated carbon showed very good results in the adsorption of heavy metals (Cd2+, Co2+) and dye residues (methylene blue, crystal violet) [31].
The objective of this research was to prepare, characterize and describe the adsorption potential of materials based on leaching residues obtained from deep-sea nodule leaching in SO2-H2SO4-H2O medium. Leaching residue modification by chemical, mechanochemical and heat treatment was carried out in order to create effective and low-cost adsorbents of heavy metals. Moreover, the preparation of new nanocoated adsorbents based on the leaching residues, and the efficiency of their subsequent use for As(V) removal, was studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Adsorbents

The deep-sea nodules were obtained from Interoceanmetal Joint Organization, Szczecin, Poland. The content of their main constituents is shown in Table 1.
Nodules were repeatedly washed with portable and distilled water to get rid of soluble ions and to displace seawater from nodules pores. The washed nodules were dried at 70 °C for 3 days and ground in a vibration laboratory mill for 10 min. Based on our previous work [2], the leaching of nodules was carried out in a solution containing 20 g/L SO2 and 100 g/L H2SO4 at 90 °C for 60 min with a liquid to solid ratio = 10:1. After filtration, leach residue was washed several times with distilled water to remove all the sulfate, then dried in an oven at 100 °C for 24 h. The following adsorbents were prepared by the leaching-residue treatments described below.
Adsorbent A1: Leaching residue was used as prepared without additional processing.
Adsorbents A2/Cl and A2/N: Leaching residue was added to a solution of 10 vol. % HCl and HNO3, respectively (liquid to solid ratio of 20:1). The suspension was agitated for 24 h at laboratory temperature. The adsorbents were repeatedly washed with distilled water and dried at 100 °C for 12 h.
Adsorbent A3/1 and A3/Cl: Adsorbent A1 and A2/Cl were heated in an oven at 250 °C for 8 h.
Adsorbent A4/Cl: Adsorbent A2/Cl was milled in Planetary Micro Mill PULVERISETTE 7 (Fritsch Ltd., Idar-Oberstein, Germany) using water medium and operating at 600 rpm for 30 min. The product was washed with ethanol and dried in the air.
Adsorbent A5/FeII: 1 g of leaching residue and 50 mL of 0.6 mol/L FeSO4∙7H2O prepared under N2 atmosphere was agitated at 250 rpm in a sealed polyethylene bottle at laboratory temperature for 24 h. The solid phase was filtered off, washed with distilled water, dried at 50 °C for 12 h and homogenized.
Adsorbent A5/FeIII: 1 g of leaching residue with 50 mL of 0.025 mol/L Fe(NO3)3∙9H2O and 0.05 mol/L NaOH were agitated at 250 rpm in a sealed polyethylene bottle at laboratory temperature for 24 h. Then the solid phase was filtered off, washed with distilled water, dried at 50 °C for 12 h and homogenized.
Adsorbent A5/AlIII: NaOH solution (4 mol/L) was gradually added into 250 mL of 1 mol/L AlCl3∙6H2O up to pH about 6.0, until the formation of AlOOH precipitate, then 20 g of leaching residue was mixed with the suspension of AlOOH and agitated in a sealed polyethylene bottle at laboratory temperature for 24 h. The solid phase was filtered off, washed with distilled water, dried at 50 °C for 12 h and homogenized.

2.2. Sorbents Characterization

Chemical and phase composition analysis of adsorbents was performed using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) ARL 9400 XP (Thermo Fisher, Ecublens, Switzerland) and an X-ray diffraction spectrometer (XRD) PANalytical X’pertPRO (PANalytical, Almeo, Netherlands). Structural characterization was carried out using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) TESCAN Vega 3 LMU (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic). Size and size distribution of adsorbent particles were determined by Partica LA 950/V2 (HORIBA Scientific, Kyoto, Japan), and laser-particle sizers Analysette 22 MicroTec plus (Fritsch Ltd., Idar-Oberstein, Germany). The average specific surface area was measured by the Brunauer–Elmet–Teller nitrogen adsorption method (BET–N2 adsorption) along with the pore size and pore volume using an ASAP 2020 (Accelerated Surface Area and Porosimetry Analyzer; Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). Thermogravimetry (TG) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) was performed by TG-DTA Setsys Evolution (Setaram, Caluire, France).

2.3. Determination of Zero Charge Point (pHpzc)

For determination of zero charge point pHpzc, an acid-base titration was carried out using 0.5 and 1.5 g of adsorbent suspended in 50 mL of 0.03 mol/L KNO3 solutions and agitated for 24 h in an orbital shaker at 250 rpm until the pH was kept constant. Then, 0.1 mL of 0.1 mol/L KOH solution was added to the suspensions to alkalize surface sites, and suspensions were titrated by adding 0.05 mL of 0.1 mol/L HNO3 solution under continuous agitation. After each addition of a defined amount of HNO3, the corresponding pH value was recorded, and the plots of pH as a function of the added amount of acid were constructed for both samples. pHpzc was identified as the intersection point of the curves with the plot for a blank solution.

2.4. Adsorption Tests

Adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Co(II) and As(V) were studied in model solutions prepared from Pb(NO3)2, Cd(NO3)2∙4H2O, CuSO4∙5H2O, NiSO4∙7H2O, CoSO4∙7H2O and Na2HAsO4∙7H2O (all of analytical grade). Batch experiments were carried out by mixing 0.1 g of the adsorbent with 50 mL of a testing solution containing 100 mg/L of a tested metal in a 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask. The suspension was then agitated in an orbital shaker at 200 rpm for up to 7 h. The effects of pH and adsorption kinetics were evaluated for adsorbents A1, A2/Cl and A2/N in test solutions of Pb, Cd, Cu, Ni and Co. Based on the results obtained, the efficiency of adsorbents after thermal and mechanical treatment (A3/1, A3/Cl, A4/Cl) was then tested in same solutions at one chosen pH. Kinetics of As(V) removal from the solution were investigated for adsorbents with nanosized oxyhydroxide coating A5/FeII, A5/FeIII and A5/AlIII at pH 7 and for comparison also for the adsorbent A1. Concentrations of heavy metals in solution were determined by atomic absorption spectrometer GBC 932 plus (GBC Scientific Equipment Ltd., Dandenong, Australia), and in the case of As(V) by flameless graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometer AAS 880 (Varian, Palo Alto, USA). pH meter Orion 525 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA) was used for pH measurements.
The amount of metal per gram of sorbent q (mg/g) was calculated using Equation (1):
q = (c0 − ct)V/m
where c0 and ct are initial and final concentrations of the selected metal (mg/L), V is the volume of the solution (L) and m is the mass of an adsorbent (g).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of Prepared Sorbents

According to XRF, all sorbents had a very similar elemental composition (Table 2), with the main constituents being Si, Al, Ba, Ca and K. The adsorbents A5/FeII, A5/FeIII and A5/AlIII were enriched by Fe and Al, respectively, indicating the formation of new compounds of Fe and Al.
The XRD analysis shows that the original leaching residue consisted of six phases: albite (NaAlSi3O8), muscovite (K(AlFe)2AlSi3O10(OH)2), quartz (SiO2), barite (BaSO4), orthoclase (K(AlSi3O8)) and dickite (Al2Si2O5(OH)4) (Figure 1). This composition was preserved only after HNO3 treatment. Other preparation methods lead to the elimination of orthoclase and dickite. Dickite was dissolved in HCl, probably due to an ion exchange reaction. Orthoclase reacts with HCl to form HAlSi3O8 and KCl. Otherwise, the phase composition of all adsorbents is similar, consisting of the four remaining phases and differing only in quantity of constituents (Table 3). No new crystalline phases containing Al or Fe were detected in the composition of the series A5 adsorbents, which can be explained by the formation of amorphous hydrous compounds such as hydroxides and/or oxyhydroxides.
The BET analysis confirms the assumption that all sorbents are very porous with a high specific surface over 200 m2/g (Table 4). The chemical treatment had almost no effect on the adsorbents’ porosity. However, milling and heat treatment resulted in a slight reduction. With the deposition of Fe and Al onto the original leaching residue, porosity increased significantly. The increased specific surface of A5 adsorbents after Fe and especially Al deposition indicates the creation of new smaller particles.
The results of particle size distribution for the selected sorbents are presented in Figure 2. The heat treatment and chemical activation in HNO3 of the original leaching residue (A3/1, A2/N) led to a negligible decrease in particle size, but slightly altered the size distribution. On the other hand, chemical activation in HCl had a positive impact on the reduction of bigger particles (A2/Cl, A3/Cl, A4/Cl). Subsequent heat treatment and milling of adsorbent A2/Cl reduced the amount of bigger particles even more, and significantly increased the size of smaller particle fractions. The particle size distribution of the series of A5 sorbents was similar to the distribution of the adsorbent A1.
SEM images of adsorbents show that adsorbents consisted of particles and aggregates of various particle sizes (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The extensive aggregation of small particles resulted in high specific surfaces of the adsorbents (Table 4). The adsorbents A5/FeII, A5/FeIII and A5/AIII (Figure 4) appeared to contain small particles of the particle size of approximately hundreds of nanometers deposited on much bigger particles of the original leaching residue. This deposition was the probable reason for the significant increase in specific adsorbent surfaces of the modified adsorbents.
The points of zero charge of original and modified adsorbents are listed in Table 5. Zero charge point (pHpzc) of adsorbents A1, A2/N and A2/Cl was determined as 3.12, 3.05 and 2.96, respectively. At a pH higher than ~3, the surface of the adsorbent should gain a negative charge, which enables the effective binding of cations.

3.2. Adsorption on A1, A2/N and A2/Cl

The adsorption of Pb and Cd onto adsorbents A1, A2/Cl and A2/N proceeded very fast and completed in about 5 min (Figure 5a,b). At a pH higher than 2, the uptake of metals increased very fast and achieved the optimal value at pH 4 for Pb, and pH 5 for Cd. Higher pH led only to insignificant increases in adsorption capacities. Chemical activation of the adsorbent A1 in HCl did not affect sorption capacity for Cd, but led to increased adsorption capacity of Pb. After treatment in HNO3, the adsorption capacities for both elements slightly decreased (Figure 6a,b).
The adsorption of Cu, Ni and Co was slow. Their sorption achieved a steady state after almost 4 h (Figure 5c–e). At a pH lower than 2.5, the adsorption did not proceed. Adsorption capacity grew rapidly from pH 2.5 to 3–4, then increased more slowly with increasing pH. Chemically activated adsorbents were more effective in the removal of Cu and Co, while the effectiveness for Ni removal was very similar for all three adsorbents (Figure 6c–e). Maximum adsorption capacities of A1, A2/Cl and A2/N for Cu, Ni and Co were lower than for Pb and Cd, but were still useful in practice.
The adsorbents A1, A2/Cl and A2/N were effective even at a pH lower than pHpzc. A possible explanation is the combination of electrostatic adsorption mechanism and the ligand exchange mechanism, which might also contribute to the adsorption process.

3.3. Adsorption on A3/1, A3/Cl and A4/Cl

Results of adsorption on thermally and mechanically treated adsorbents at selected pHs are presented in Table 6. The thermal treatment of adsorbent A1 was found to improve its adsorption capacity for all tested elements. Thermal treatment after the chemical activation in HCl, however, did not lead to any improvement in adsorption capacity. Mechanically treated adsorbent increased adsorption capacity only for Cd and Cu.
Data from TG–DTA (Figure 7) show a big weight decease of about 8% around temperature 100 °C, indicating water release from the original leaching residue/adsorbent A1. After that, the weight loss increased gradually with increasing temperatures, indicating a probable release of chemically bound water at temperatures around 250 °C, and a gradual decomposition of adsorbent structure with increasing temperatures. This is presumably the reason why the thermal treatment was not effective in increasing the sorption capacity.

3.4. As(V) adsorption on A1, A5/FeII, A5/FeIII and A5/AlIII

The adsorbent A5/AlIII was very effective in As(V) removal from the solution. It could adsorb a high amount of As(V) (28.1 mg/g) in a short time (~8 min) (Figure 8). Adsorbents with Fe coating had a significantly lower capacity (3.3 mg/g for A5/FeII and 1.5 mg/g for A5/FeIII), but shared the equally quick adsorption kinetics. Adsorbent A1 was ineffective in As(V) removal from the solution, and therefore Fe/Al coating enables the utilization of leaching residue as adsorbent even for treatment of solutions containing this highly toxic metal.
Compared to recently tested nanomaterials from various studies, the sorption abilities of newly prepared adsorbents with Fe coating were much lower; however, the adsorbent with AlIII coating appeared to have high potential to be one of the best materials from the group as a low-cost adsorbent of As(V). Adsorption characteristics of some studied sorbents are summarized in Table 7.

4. Conclusions

The leaching residue from leaching deep-sea nodules in SO2/H2SO4/H2O medium was utilized as an adsorbent for removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. The series of adsorbents were prepared by chemical, mechanical and thermal activation, and coating with Fe and Al.
All adsorbents were found to have similar elemental and phase composition, with particle size ranging from a few hundred nm up to 100 µm, a high specific surface above 200 m2/g and a hygroscopic character.
The adsorption tests showed that untreated leaching residue and chemically activated leaching residues are very effective adsorbents of Pb(II) and Cd(II) in terms of high adsorption capacity and fast kinetics. Cu(II), Ni(II) and Co(II) can also be removed by those materials, but the adsorption capacity is lower, and the adsorption process is slower. The residue activated in HCl exhibited very good results for all tested elements, with adsorption capacities around 12 mg/g for Pb, 9.8 mg/g for Cd(II), 5.3 mg/g for Cu(II), 3.1 mg/g for Ni(II) and 2 mg/g for Co(II). The influence of heat and mechanical treatment on adsorption properties was mostly negligible. Mechanical activation increased the sorption capacity only in the case of sorption of Cd(II) and Cu(II).
The most-promising adsorbents were obtained by coprecipitation of particles based on FeII, FeIII and AlIII onto the surface of leaching residue. These coated adsorbents were proven to be beneficial in the removal of As(V), especially the adsorbent based on AlIII that exhibited significantly increased specific surface. While untreated leaching residue was not effective for As(V) removal, and Fe-coated adsorbents exhibited an adsorption capacity only around 3.3 mg/g (FeII) and 1.5 (FeIII), the Al-coated adsorbent reached a final sorption capacity of approximately 28.1 mg/g in less than 10 min. Due to the easiness of the preparation procedure and high sorption capacity, the new Al-based adsorbent can be considered a very promising material for cheap As(V) removal, compared with the recent novel adsorbents, which are often prepared using complicated methods. Moreover, the utilization of waste leach residue as low-cost adsorbents for the effective removal of heavy metals will improve the economy and increase the effectiveness of technology for processing deep-sea nodules in a hydrometallurgical way, using SO2 as the reductant in H2SO4 medium, as well as through methods for wastewater treatment involving adsorption.

Author Contributions

E.K. compiled the original draft and carried out experiments. H.N.V. worked as a scientific supervisor, designed the experiments, and evaluated results. P.D. helped with the measurements and constructed the apparatus. T.A. and I.D. secured the financial support and validated the results. A.A. revised the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by Interoceanmetal Joint Organization, Szczecin, Poland under international grant No. 106 19 0063.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abramovski, T.; Stefanova, V.P.; Causse, R.; Romanchuk, A. Technologies for the Processing of Polymetallic Nodules from Clarion Clipperton Zone in the Pacific Ocean. J. Chem. Technol. Metall. 2017, 52, 258–269. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vu, H.; Jandová, J.; Lisá, K.; Vranka, F. Leaching of manganese deep ocean nodules in FeSO4–H2SO4–H2O solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2005, 77, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Das, R.P.; Anand, S. Metallurgical Processing of Polymetallic Ocean Nodules. In Deep-Sea Mining: Resource Potential, Technical and Environmental Considerations; Sharma, R., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 365–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sahoo, R.N.; Das, S.C.; Reddy, B.R.; Rath, P.C.; Das, R.P. Adsorption of copper on manganese nodule residue obtained from NH3–SO2 leaching. Hydrometallurgy 2001, 62, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Agrawal, A.; Sahu, K.K. Kinetic and isotherm studies of cadmium adsorption on manganese nodule residue. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137, 915–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Randhawa, N.S.; Jana, R.K. Efficient removal of aqueous lead by leached sea nodules residue. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 56, 2937–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El-Ashtoukhy, E.S.Z.; Abdel-Aziz, M.H. Removal of copper from aqueous solutions by cementation in a bubble column reactor fitted with horizontal screens. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2013, 121, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, J.-R.; Wang, X.; Yuan, B.; Fu, M.-L. Layered chalcogenide for Cu2+ removal by ion-exchange from wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 2014, 200, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abid, M.F.; Zablouk, M.A.; Abid-Alameer, A.M. Experimental study of dye removal from industrial wastewater by membrane technologies of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2012, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tran, N.; Drogui, P.; Blais, J.-F.; Mercier, G. Phosphorus removal from spiked municipal wastewater using either electrochemical coagulation or chemical coagulation as tertiary treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 95, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khosa, M.A.; Shah, S.S.; Feng, X. Metal sericin complexation and ultrafiltration of heavy metals from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 244, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rahimi, M.; Schoener, Z.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, F.; Gorski, C.A.; Logan, B.E. Removal of copper from water using a thermally regenerative electrodeposition battery. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 322, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kul, M.; Oskay, K.O. Separation and recovery of valuable metals from real mix electroplating wastewater by solvent extraction. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 155, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Su, Y.-N.; Lin, W.-S.; Hou, C.-H.; Den, W. Performance of integrated membrane filtration and electrodialysis processes for copper recovery from wafer polishing wastewater. J. Water Process Eng. 2014, 4, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dave, P.N.; Subrahmanyam, N.; Sharma, S. Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Copper Ions Removal from Aqueous Solution by Use of Activated Charcoal. Indian J. Chem. Techn. 2009, 16, 234–239. [Google Scholar]
  16. Parida, K.M.; Mallick, S.; Mohapatra, B.K.; Misra, V.N. Studies on manganese-nodule leached residues: 1. Physicochemical characterization and its adsorption behavior toward Ni2+ in aqueous system. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 277, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mallick, S.; Dash, S.S.; Parida, K.M. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium on manganese nodule leached residue obtained from NH3–SO2 leaching. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 297, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Das, N.; Jana, R.K. Adsorption of some bivalent heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by manganese nodule leached residues. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 293, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Randhawa, N.S.; Dwivedi, D.; Prajapati, S.; Jana, R.K. Application of manganese nodules leaching residue for adsorption of nickel(II) ions from aqueous solution. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Randhawa, N.S.; Das, N.N.; Jana, R.K. Selenite adsorption using leached residues generated by reduction roasting–ammonia leaching of manganese nodules. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 241, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dash, S.S.; Parida, K.M. Studies on selenite adsorption using manganese nodule leached residues. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 307, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Parida, K.M.; Pradhan, A.C. Removal of phenolic compounds from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto manganese nodule leached residue. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 173, 758–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Parida, K.M.; Mallick, S.; Dash, S.S. Studies on manganese nodule leached residues: 2. Adsorption of aqueous phosphate on manganese nodule leached residues. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 290, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Behera, R.K.; Satapathy, P.K.; Randhawa, N.S.; Das, N.N. Adsorptive Removal of Phosphate Ions Using Leached Sea Nodule Residue Generated by the Reduction Roasting Ammoniacal Leaching Process. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2010, 28, 611–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Parida, K.M.; Sahu, S.; Reddy, K.H.; Sahoo, P.C. A Kinetic, Thermodynamic, and Mechanistic Approach toward Adsorption of Methylene Blue over Water-Washed Manganese Nodule Leached Residues. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stahl, R.S.; James, B.R. Zinc sorption by manganese-oxide-coated sand as a function of pH. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1991, 55, 1291–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lo, S.-L.; Jeng, H.-T.; Lai, C.-H. Characteristics and adsorption properties of iron-coated sand. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Burakov, A.E.; Galunin, E.V.; Burakova, I.V.; Kucherova, A.E.; Agarwal, S.; Tkachev, A.G.; Gupta, V.K. Adsorption of heavy metals on conventional and nanostructured materials for wastewater treatment purposes: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 148, 702–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, M.; Thanh, D.N.; Ulbrich, P.; Strnadová, N.; Štěpánek, F. Synthesis, characterization and study of arsenate adsorption from aqueous solution by α- and δ-phase manganese dioxide nanoadsorbents. J. Solid State Chem. 2010, 183, 2979–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gong, J.-L.; Wang, X.-Y.; Zeng, G.-M.; Chen, L.; Deng, J.-H.; Zhang, X.-R.; Niu, Q.-Y. Copper (II) removal by pectin–iron oxide magnetic nanocomposite adsorbent. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 185–186, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dil, E.A.; Ghaedi, M.; Asfaram, A. The performance of nanorods material as adsorbent for removal of azo dyes and heavy metal ions: Application of ultrasound wave, optimization and modeling. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 34, 792–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, S.; Kang, S.; Wang, G.; Zhao, H.; Cai, W. Micro/nanostructured porous Fe–Ni binary oxide and its enhanced arsenic adsorption performances. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 458, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, M.-D.; Wu, H.; Deng, Z.-Y.; Zhao, X. Arsenic removal from water by nanometer iron oxide coated single-wall carbon nanotubes. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 259, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, R.; Zhi, C.; Yang, H.; Bando, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Sugiur, N.; Golberg, D. Arsenic (V) adsorption on Fe3O4 nanoparticle-coated boron nitride nanotubes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 359, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Feng, L.; Cao, M.; Ma, X.; Zhu, Y.; Hu, C. Superparamagnetic high-surface-area Fe3O4 nanoparticles as adsorbents for arsenic removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 217, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hernández-Flores, H.; Pariona, N.; Herrera-Trejo, M.; Hdz-García, H.M.; Mtz-Enriquez, A.I. Concrete/maghemite nanocomposites as novel adsorbents for arsenic removal. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1171, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD pattern of adsorbent A1.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of adsorbent A1.
Metals 09 00472 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of adsorbents.
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of adsorbents.
Metals 09 00472 g002
Figure 3. Electron images of adsorbents A1, A2/N, A2/Cl, A3/1, A3/Cl and A4/Cl.
Figure 3. Electron images of adsorbents A1, A2/N, A2/Cl, A3/1, A3/Cl and A4/Cl.
Metals 09 00472 g003
Figure 4. Electron images of adsorbents A5/FeII, A5/FeIII and A5/AlIII.
Figure 4. Electron images of adsorbents A5/FeII, A5/FeIII and A5/AlIII.
Metals 09 00472 g004
Figure 5. Adsorption kinetics of Pb (pH 5.0), Cd (pH 6.0), Cu (4.0), Ni (pH 5.5) and Co (pH 5.0) onto the adsorbents A1, A2/Cl and A2/N.
Figure 5. Adsorption kinetics of Pb (pH 5.0), Cd (pH 6.0), Cu (4.0), Ni (pH 5.5) and Co (pH 5.0) onto the adsorbents A1, A2/Cl and A2/N.
Metals 09 00472 g005
Figure 6. Effect of pH on the adsorption of (a) Pb, (b) Cd, (c) Cu, (d) Ni and (e) Co onto adsorbents after 8 h.
Figure 6. Effect of pH on the adsorption of (a) Pb, (b) Cd, (c) Cu, (d) Ni and (e) Co onto adsorbents after 8 h.
Metals 09 00472 g006
Figure 7. TG–DTA analysis of decomposition of the sorbent A1 in the air at heating rate 10 °C/min.
Figure 7. TG–DTA analysis of decomposition of the sorbent A1 in the air at heating rate 10 °C/min.
Metals 09 00472 g007
Figure 8. Adsorption kinetics of As(V) onto the adsorbents A5/FeII, A5/FeIII, A5/AlIII and A1 at pH 7.0.
Figure 8. Adsorption kinetics of As(V) onto the adsorbents A5/FeII, A5/FeIII, A5/AlIII and A1 at pH 7.0.
Metals 09 00472 g008
Table 1. Main constituents of used nodules.
Table 1. Main constituents of used nodules.
ElementMnFeSiAlMgCaNaCuNiTiZnCo
wt. %30.574.413.532.161.871.841.641.181.140.350.140.13
Table 2. The chemical composition of adsorbents (wt. %).
Table 2. The chemical composition of adsorbents (wt. %).
ElementAdsorbent
A1A2/NA2/ClA3/1A3/ClA4/ClA5/FeIIA5/FeIIIA5/AlIII
Si 38.7141.8740.2440.3040.1841.0439.1639.7327.78
Al 5.956.736.286.016.196.156.336.1713.77
Fe 1.661.741.511.721.521.503.074.891.18
K 2.392.482.362.502.412.342.372.483.21
Ca 1.421.341.291.351.281.281.401.391.14
Na 0.891.060.870.910.880.881.001.010.67
Ba 3.603.624.124.014.143.503.953.232.06
Mg 0.410.420.530.420.530.500.450.450.23
S 1.100.920.621.140.620.541.430.890.68
Sr 0.290.150.140.300.140.150.270.180.09
Ti 0.670.630.520.690.530.520.640.660.46
Pb 0.240.140.160.290.150.150.250.140.15
Cl0.030.030.030.040.030.030.030.020.79
Table 3. Phase composition of the adsorbents.
Table 3. Phase composition of the adsorbents.
PhaseSemiQuant %
A1A2/NA2/ClA3/1A3/ClA4/ClA5/FeIIA5/FeIIIA5/AlIII
Albite312846403946534041
Muscovite292821363721263636
Quartz191927191827162019
Barite566566544
Orthoclase1113-------
Dickite56-------
Table 4. Specific surface of adsorbents (m2/g).
Table 4. Specific surface of adsorbents (m2/g).
AdsorbentA1A2/NA2/ClA3/1A3/ClA4/ClA5/FeIIA5/FeIIIA5/AlIII
Specific surface234227229220211216274253298
Table 5. Point of zero charge of selected adsorbents.
Table 5. Point of zero charge of selected adsorbents.
AdsorbentpHpzc
A13.12
A2/N3.05
A2/Cl2.96
A3/13.10
A3/Cl3.01
A4/Cl2.97
Table 6. The adsorption capacity of thermally and mechanically treated adsorbents after 8 h.
Table 6. The adsorption capacity of thermally and mechanically treated adsorbents after 8 h.
Adsorbentq (mg/g)
PbCdCuNiCo
A15.0
pH 5.0
9.8
pH 5.0
2.5
pH 5.0
2.2
pH 4.0
1.1
pH 4.5
A3/111.0
pH 5.0
10.8
pH 5.0
3.0
pH 5.0
2.5
pH 4
0.9
pH 4.5
A3/Cl7.7
pH 5.0
9.9
pH 5.0
5.0
pH 5.0
2.4
pH 4.0
1.7
pH 4.5
A4/Cl9.4
pH 4.5
11.5
pH 4.0
5.7
pH 4.5
2.7
pH 4.0
1.7
pH 4.5
Table 7. Comparison of As(V) adsorption capacities of different adsorbents.
Table 7. Comparison of As(V) adsorption capacities of different adsorbents.
AdsorbentInitial pHAdsorption Capacity (mg/g)Specific Surface/Particle SizeReference
Micro-/nanostructured Fe–Ni binary oxides7.090.1245 m2/g[32]
Iron oxide nanoparticle-coated single-wall carbon nanotubes4.049.72–3 nm[33]
Fe3O4 nanoparticle-coated boron nitride nanotubes6.932.220–50 nm[34]
α-MnO2 nanorods6.519.450–100 nm length, 5 nm wide[29]
Ascorbic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles7.016.7179 m2/g[35]
Concrete/maghemite nanocomposites5.08.8nanopore 20–70 nm[36]
AlIII-coated leaching residue 7.028.1298 m2/gPresent work
FeII-coated leaching residue 7.03.3274 m2/g
FeIII-coated leaching residue 7.01.5253 m2/g

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Metals EISSN 2075-4701 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top