Next Article in Journal
Analyzing the Deformation and Fracture of Bioinert Titanium, Zirconium and Niobium Alloys in Different Structural States by the Use of Infrared Thermography
Previous Article in Journal
Removal of Tramp Elements within 7075 Alloy by Super-Gravity Aided Rheorefining Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Soft Magnetic Properties of Iron-Based Powder Cores with Co-Existence of Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 Nanoparticles

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
2
Shanghai Key Laboratory for R&D and Application of Metallic Functional Materials, Shanghai 201804, China
3
School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 20082, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2018, 8(9), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/met8090702
Submission received: 6 August 2018 / Revised: 3 September 2018 / Accepted: 4 September 2018 / Published: 6 September 2018

Abstract

:
An iron-based soft magnetic composite with Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 insulation coating has been prepared by powder metallurgy method. This work investigated the microstructure and magnetic properties of Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 powder cores. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with an energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) analysis indicated that the Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 nanoparticles were uniformly coated on the surface of Fe powders. The co-existence of Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 contributes to the preferable distribution of nano-sized insulation powders and excellent soft magnetic properties of soft magnetic composite (SMC) with high saturation magnetization Ms (215 A·m2/kg), low core loss (178.7 W/kg measured at 100 kHz, 50 mT), and high effective amplitude permeability of 114 (measured at 100 kHz). Overall, this work has great potential for realizing low core loss and outstanding soft magnetic properties of Fe-based powder cores.

1. Introduction

Soft magnetic composites (SMCs), as reported by H. Shokrollahi in 2007 [1], are considered as advanced electrical inductance materials. SMCs can be described as ferromagnetic powders that are surrounded by a thin but electrically insulating layer and pressed into cores by easy powder metallurgy methods. Compared with the conventional laminated steel cores, SMCs offer enormous advantages, such as three-dimensional isotropic magnetic properties, low eddy-current core loss at high frequency, and high adaptability to complex machine design. Hence, it has replaced the laminated steel cores in most fields of electric motors, transformer cores, power switching inductors, online noise filters, and chokes [2,3,4,5].
With the increasing demands of electromagnetic devices at high frequency, improving the magnetic performance of SMCs is of crucial importance [6]. The challenge in current SMCs is obtaining low eddy-current core loss at high frequency, high magnetic permeability, and high thermal stability of the materials [7,8]. Eddy-current loss can be minimized in several ways. The latest technology is to increase the electrical resistivity of the insulating coatings [1]. Besides, to improve the magnetic permeability, the amount of insulation coatings on the surface should be minimized, and the ferromagnetic powder content maximized [9]. Thus, many studies have been carried out to develop suitable insulating materials and proper manufacturing methods in order to improve the soft magnetic properties of SMCs. Generally, the insulating materials are divided into organic and inorganic materials. Organic materials such as epoxy resin [10], parylene [11], and phenolic resin [12] exhibit a satisfactory performance in increasing the resistivity of iron powders, but their application under high temperatures is limited due to the nature of high polymer materials. Inorganic coating can therefore be a better choice, since, if the proper amount of coating material is applied, they have high thermal stability and improved soft magnetic properties. Inorganic coating materials are divided into two different types. Ceramic materials which are dia- or anti-ferromagnetic constitute one type. These materials—such as Al2O3 [13], SiO2 [14], and ZrO2 [15]—which can significantly decrease the core loss at a high frequency, also decrease magnetic permeability by reducing the proportion of magnetic materials. Materials that exhibit ferro- or ferrimagnetism, which can ultimately affect the core loss and improve the magnetic permeability compared with the ceramic coating materials, constitute the other type. It was found that the use of nanoparticles of Fe3O4 resulted in an improvement in soft magnetization [16]. However, Fe3O4 is a semiconductor with a resistivity of 10-2 Ω·cm, so the eddy-current core loss will increase quickly as the frequency increases [17]. MnZnFe2O4 ferrite has been used in many applications such as radio frequency circus and transformer cores due to its high electrical resistivity.
In this study, a novel SMC which was covered by Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 nanoparticles was prepared. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles were dispersed uniformly in the as-prepared MnZnFe2O4 gel to form a uniform coating on the iron powders. Moreover, the simultaneous incorporation of Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 resulted in the high magnetic saturation, high permeability, and reduced eddy-currency core loss.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Pure atomized iron powder with an average particle size of 75 μm was supplied by An Gang Industries Co., Ltd. (Anshan, China), Nano–Fe3O4 powders (purity > 99.99%,20 nm) were purchased from Aladdin biochemical Polytron Technologies Company (Shanghai, China) and used without further treatment. MnZnFe2O4 manufactured by a novel sol-gel auto-combustion method was used as the insulation material. Analytically pure chemicals manganese nitrate solution (50 wt. % in H2O, Aladdin), zinc nitrate hexahydrate (99%, Aladdin), and iron nitrate nonahydrate (99%, Aladdin) were dissolved in deionized water and citric acid (99.8%, Aladdin) to prepare the soft magnetic MnZn ferrites.

2.2. Preparation of As-Prepared MnZn Ferrite Sol

Manganese nitrate solution, zinc nitrate hexahydrate, and iron nitrate nonahydrate were dissolved in deionized water and citric acid. Then the mixture was heated to 75 °C in an oil bath and mixed evenly in a three-necked round bottom flask under magnetic stirring. Ammonia was subsequently added as the catalyst to adjust the PH value to about 5 and shorten the gel time. The resulting mixture was maintained under magnetic stirring at 75 °C for 4 h.

2.3. Composite Production

The Nano-Fe3O4 powders were mixed with the as-prepared MnZn ferrite sol by ultrasonic treatment to prevent the agglomeration of nanoparticles. The powder mixture was dried at 100 °C for 1 h to get the gel. Then the gel was coated on the iron powders by mechanic stirring and auto-combustion. The effect of the content of MnZn ferrites (0.5–3 wt. %) and Nano-Fe3O4 powders (0.5–3 wt. %) is discussed in this paper. The coated iron powders were compacted at 800 MPa in a die with 0.5 wt. % zinc stearate as the lubricant. This process resulted in a ring shapes composite with an outer diameter of 20 mm, an inner diameter of 12 mm, and a thickness of 3 mm. The schematic formation process is shown in Figure 1.

2.4. Material Characterization

The crystal structure analysis and morphology of the resulting product were carried out by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (DX-2007, Dandong Fang Yuan Co., Ltd, Dandong, China) with Cu K α diffraction at 30 kV and 30 mA at room temperature, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Nova NanoSEM 450, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with an energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) (Ultra, EDAX, Mahwah, NJ, USA). The chemical state of coating was identified by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, 250XI, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The densities of powder cores were determined by Archimedes principle with ethanol as the immersion fluid in the densimeter (ZMD-2, Shanghai Fangrui Instrument Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). The electrical resistivities of the powder cores were measured by the four-point probe method. The magnetic properties of the samples, such as the saturation magnetization (Ms) and remnant magnetization (Mr), were measured by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Lakeshore 7407, Columbus, OH, USA) at room temperature. The amplitude permeability and core loss of the samples were investigated by a soft magnetic AC measuring instrument (MATS-2010SA/500k, Linkioin, Loudi, China) at a magnetic excitation level of 50 mT and the frequency range from 5 kHz to 100 kHz. The D-C magnetic property was recorded using a soft magnetic DC measuring instrument (MATS-2010SD, Linkioin, Loudi, China) under the maximum applied magnetic field of 45,000 A/m.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Soft Magnetic Composites

The SEM images of iron and iron powders after the coating process are shown in Figure 2. Obviously, the surface of the coated composite (Figure 2b) shows rough morphologies with many fine particles compared with the smooth surface morphologies of the typical water-atomized powders (Figure 2a). It can be seen that the nanoparticles of Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 are uniform and regular in size and shape (inset in Figure 2b). The coating of the iron powder surface by ferrites is indirectly shown in Figure 3, and the existence of iron, manganese, zinc, and oxygen clearly indicates the presence of Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite coating on the surface of the water-atomized iron powders.
Furthermore, as shown in Figure 4, the XRD pattern revealed the existence of the Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite phase on the surface of iron powders. According to the JCPDS card, Bragg peaks of low intensity centered at 2θ of 30°, 35°, 43°, 53°, 57°and 63° can be ascribed to the (220), (331), (400), (422), (511), and (440) planes of the Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite coating. It is clear that there are no other extra Bragg peaks in the composite powders, except those corresponding to the diffraction peaks of iron and Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite. This observation can also be confirmed by the previous EDS mapping analysis (Figure 3).
As the Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 shows similar XRD profiles but different valences of the Fe ion [18], XPS characterization was carried out to determine the chemical state of Fe ion. In the survey spectrum (Figure 5a), the elements, Mn, Zn, and Fe can be observed. Two main peaks of Fe 2p1/2 and Fe 2p3/2 which located at 710.9 eV and 724.3 eV were observed in the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Fe 2p in Figure 5b. In addition, a satellite peak, located at 718.5 eV, indicates the presence of Fe3+ [19]. The Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions were assumed to generate overlapping Fe 2p spectra. In order to identify the detailed chemical state of the Fe ion, the peaks were deconvoluted into two peaks. Fe3O4 is alternatively expressed as FeO·Fe2O3, which is the chemical state of a mixture of Fe3+ and Fe2+ [19]. As shown in Figure 5b, the Fe 2p peaks fitted well with the Fe3+ and Fe2+ peaks, indicating that the oxidation layer consists of Fe3O4.
To further indicate the uniformity of the insulation coating on the iron powders, an SEM image of the cross section of the composite was taken, as shown in Figure 6. It can be observed from Figure 6 that the insulation parts were uniformly distributed around the iron particles. The boundary of pure iron particles is almost 2 μm thick. This result further verified that the iron powders are uniformly covered by the nanoparticles of ferrites.

3.2. Electrical and Magnetic Properties of the Composites

Magnetic hysteresis loops for Fe, Fe/Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4, Fe3O4, and MnZnFe2O4 powders are shown in Figure 7. The loops revealed the typical magnetic behavior of SMCs, at an external field of ~30,000 Oe. The magnetic parameters such as Ms, Mr, and the ratio of remnant magnetization to saturation magnetization (Mr/Ms) are clearly presented in Table 1. It is found that the saturation magnetization of Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 powders (215.6 A·m2/kg) is slightly lower than that of Fe powder (219.5 A·m2/kg) but higher than that of Fe3O4 powders (84.1 A·m2/kg) and MnZnFe2O4 powders (33.2 A·m2/kg). This result demonstrated that the ferrimagnetic insulation coating has a positive effect on the saturation magnetization of SMC. The Ms value of composite iron powders decreased as the percentage of magnetic Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 phase increased. When the percentage of Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 increased from 1 wt. % to 6 wt. %, the Ms decreased from 215 A·m2/kg to 207 A·m2/kg. As shown in the Figure 7 and Table 1, the Mr value has nearly the same trend as Ms and a similar reason can be used to explain this phenomenon. It can also be seen from Table 1 that Mr/Ms shows no change with the increasing percentage of the ferrimagnetism insulation coating. This means that the value of Mr/Ms has nothing to do with the content of the Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 phase.
The direct current performance and densities for the toroidal samples with different ferrite percentage at the maximum applied field of 45,000 A/m are shown in Table 2. The coercivity increased as the content of Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 increased from 1 wt. % to 6 wt. %. Moreover, the density decreased from 7.56 g/cm3 to 6.92 g/cm3 as the content of Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 increased from 0 wt. % to 6 wt. %. It is easy to understand that, with the increasing of ferrite, the low density of Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 leads to a decrease in the overall density of the composite. The maximum relative permeability, magnetic induction, and the remanent magnetic induction (Br) value also decrease with the increasing content of ferrite. This can be ascribed to the dilution effect of magnetic properties, caused by the ferrimagnetism insulation coating. All the samples with ferrite showed excellent DC properties, and the compact with 1 wt. % ferrite exhibited the best DC properties.
The real part and imaginary part of permeability of the Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 toroidal core at the frequency range of 1 kHz to 100 kHz are shown in Figure 8. The effect of Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 content can be clearly observed from the curves. The real part of the compacted Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 showed no obvious changes in the whole frequency range, while the amplitude permeability of the composite cores without ferrite decreases rapidly, which is attributed to the increase in the eddy current. The iron powder core has low electrical resistivity and resulted in a large eddy current. The eddy current increase with increasing frequency means that more reverse magnetic field is produced inside the magnet which could weaken the magnetic induction [8,20]. This conclusion is in accordance with the result of magnetic induction presented in Table 2. Moreover, the real part of permeability that exceeds 100 has been achieved, which may be due to the high density (>7.0 g/cm3) of compact, as shown in Table 2, and the relatively thin coating. With the increasing content of ferrite from 1 wt. % to 6 wt. %, the real permeability of compacts declined to nearly 90. This can be attributed to the increasing of the thickness of the Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite. The imaginary permeability value of the compacted Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 decreased from 34.5 to 14.3 when the content of ferrite decreased from 6 wt. % to 1 wt. %. The imaginary part of the compacted Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 exhibited a relatively low value compared with the raw Fe compact, indicating that the magnetic loss is weakened for Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 and can be ascribed to the high resistivity [20]. Obviously, Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite plays an important role in enhancing the electric resistivity of Fe powder as shown in Figure 9. With the increasing content of Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite in the composite, the electric resistivity increased from 98.3 mΩ·m to 733.2 mΩ·m.

3.3. Core Loss of the Composites and Loss Seperation

The total core loss of the composite with different ferrite contents dependence on frequency at 50 mT is shown in Figure 10. It can be observed that the total core loss increased significantly as the frequency increased from 5 kHz to 100 kHz. With the increasing of percentage of ferrite, the core loss decreased obviously. The composite with a 4 wt. % addition of Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite showed the smallest core loss compared with the raw Fe compact under the same test conditions. There exists a slight increase in the core loss of the composite with 6 wt. % ferrite (Figure 10a), which is due to the increase in hysteresis loss as shown in Figure 10b. It is well-known that the total core loss can be separated into three main parts: Hysteresis loss ( P h ), eddy current loss ( P e ) and residual loss ( P r ). The residual loss can be ignored in the metallic materials [1]. Thus, the total core loss can be expressed by the following equation: P c v = P h + P e = K h × f + K e × f 2 [1]. Where f is the frequency, K h is the hysteresis loss coefficient and K e is the eddy current loss coefficient.
Figure 10b,c show the value of the hysteresis loss and eddy current loss of the compacted Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 composite at different frequency at 50 mT with different ferrite content, which were calculated from the equation above and the obtained core loss data. As can be seen in Figure 10b, the hysteresis loss of the composite increased with the increasing content of Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite. Moreover, the value is larger than the hysteresis loss value of the raw Fe compact. The hysteresis loss mainly depends on the particle size, residual stress, and volume fraction of inclusions (pores, impurities, defects). The ferrite increases the distributed air gap in the composite, so that domain wall movement is difficult and increased the hysteresis loss consequently [21]. However, the eddy current loss of the Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite coated Fe cores was notably smaller than that of the raw Fe cores. This could be ascribed to the insulation effect caused by the Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite, which effectively reduced the eddy current loss.

4. Conclusions

In this work, an iron-based SMC with Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 insulation coating has been successfully prepared by powder metallurgy method. The co-existence of Fe3O4 and MnZnFe2O4 contributes to the preferable distribution of nano-sized insulation powders and operated as an effective insulation layer. The composite with 4wt% Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 ferrite exhibited excellent soft magnetic properties in general, with magnetic induction of 1.74 T, the lowest core loss, which was 178.7 W/kg (measured at 100 kHz and 50 mT) and good frequency-dependent characteristic at a wide range of frequencies. In all, the efficient preparation process and enhanced soft magnetic composite properties of the Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 composites promise a potential application and mass production in magnetic devices.

Author Contributions

Y.X., P.Y., and B.Y. designed the project; Y.X. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the original draft; P.Y. and B.Y. reviewed the writing.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of the 13th Five-Year Plan of China, grant number 2016YFB1200602-02.

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Jianchao Xie for his help during the submission stages of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shokrollahi, H.; Janghorban, K. Soft magnetic composite materials (SMCs). J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2007, 189, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, Y.G.; Zhu, J.G.; Zhong, J.J. Measurement and modelling of magnetic properties of soft magnetic composite material under 2D vector magnetisations. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2006, 302, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Guo, Y.G.; Zhu, J.G.; Lin, Z.W.; Zhong, J.J. 3D vector magnetic properties of soft magnetic composite material. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2006, 302, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hamler, A.; Goričan, V.; Šuštaršič, B.; Sirc, A. The use of soft magnetic composite materials in synchronous electric motor. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2006, 304, 816–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gay, D.E. Soft magnetic composite materials for ac electical applications. Metal Powder Rep. 1997, 52, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kong, L.B.; Li, Z.W.; Liu, L.; Huang, R.; Abshinova, M.; Yang, Z.H.; Tang, C.B.; Tan, P.K.; Deng, C.R.; Matitsine, S. Recent progress in some composite materials and structures for specific electromagnetic applications. Int. Mater. Rev. 2013, 58, 203–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, J.; Fan, X.A.; Wu, Z.; Li, G. Intergranular insulated Fe/SiO2 soft magnetic composite for decreased core loss. Adv. Powder Technol. 2016, 27, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, S.; Sun, A.; Lu, Z.; Cheng, C.; Gao, X. Magnetic properties of iron-based soft magnetic composites with SiO2 coating obtained by reverse microemulsion method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 381, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, S.; Sun, A.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Q.; Zhai, F.; Logan, P.; Volinsky, A.A. Iron-based soft magnetic composites with Mn–Zn ferrite nanoparticles coating obtained by sol–gel method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2012, 324, 3899–3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dias, M.M.; Mozetic, H.J.; Barboza, J.S.; Martins, R.M.; Pelegrini, L.; Schaeffer, L. Influence of resin type and content on electrical and magnetic properties of soft magnetic composites (SMCs). Powder Technol. 2013, 237, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, S.; Sun, A.; Lu, Z.; Cheng, C. Fabrication and properties of iron-based soft magnetic composites coated with parylene via chemical vapor deposition polymerization. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 153, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kollár, P.; Birčáková, Z.; Füzer, J.; Bureš, R.; Fáberová, M. Power loss separation in Fe-based composite materials. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2013, 327, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peng, Y.; Nie, J.; Zhang, W.; Ma, J.; Bao, C.; Cao, Y. Effect of the addition of Al2O3 nanoparticles on the magnetic properties of Fe soft magnetic composites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 399, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, L.; Yan, B. Fe–6.5% Si/SiO2 powder cores prepared by spark plasma sintering: Magnetic properties and sintering mechanism. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2017, 31, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Geng, K.; Xie, Y.; Xu, L.; Yan, B. Structure and magnetic properties of ZrO2-coated Fe powders and Fe/ZrO2 soft magnetic composites. Adv. Powder Technol. 2017, 28, 2015–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, B.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Yu, R. Chemical synthesis of Fe/Fe3O4 core-shell composites with enhanced soft magnetic performances. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 428, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sunday, K.J.; Hanejko, F.G.; Taheri, M.L. Magnetic and Microstructural Properties of Fe3O4-Coated Fe Powder Soft Magnetic Composites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 423, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yamashita, T.; Hayes, P. Effect of curve fitting parameters on quantitative analysis of Fe0.94O and Fe2O3 using XPS. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2006, 152, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yamashita, T.; Hayes, P. Analysis of XPS spectra of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in oxide materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 2441–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, W.; Wang, W.; Lv, J.; Ying, Y.; Yu, J.; Zheng, J.; Qiao, L.; Che, S. Structure and Magnetic Properties of Iron-based Soft Magnetic Composite with Ni-Cu-Zn Ferrite–silicone Insulation Coating. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 456, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shokrollahi, H.; Janghorban, K. Effect of warm compaction on the magnetic and electrical properties of Fe-based soft magnetic composites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 313, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Procedure for Fe3O4 and MnZn ferrite insulation coated iron powder.
Figure 1. Procedure for Fe3O4 and MnZn ferrite insulation coated iron powder.
Metals 08 00702 g001
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of iron powders; (b) SEM image of coated iron powders.
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of iron powders; (b) SEM image of coated iron powders.
Metals 08 00702 g002
Figure 3. Cross-section SEM image of Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 coated iron powders (a) and EDS mapping of Fe (b), O (c), Mn (d), Zn (e).
Figure 3. Cross-section SEM image of Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 coated iron powders (a) and EDS mapping of Fe (b), O (c), Mn (d), Zn (e).
Metals 08 00702 g003
Figure 4. XRD pattern of raw iron powders and Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 coated iron powders.
Figure 4. XRD pattern of raw iron powders and Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 coated iron powders.
Metals 08 00702 g004
Figure 5. (a) XPS spectra of Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 coated iron powders, (b) fitted Fe 2p peaks.
Figure 5. (a) XPS spectra of Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 coated iron powders, (b) fitted Fe 2p peaks.
Metals 08 00702 g005
Figure 6. Cross section SEM image of Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 coated iron-based composite.
Figure 6. Cross section SEM image of Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 coated iron-based composite.
Metals 08 00702 g006
Figure 7. Magnetic hysteresis loops for Fe, Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4, Fe3O4, and MnZnFe2O4 powders.
Figure 7. Magnetic hysteresis loops for Fe, Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4, Fe3O4, and MnZnFe2O4 powders.
Metals 08 00702 g007
Figure 8. Permeability of Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 cores at frequency range of 1 kHz to 100 kHz: (a) real part permeability; (b) imaginary part permeability.
Figure 8. Permeability of Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4 cores at frequency range of 1 kHz to 100 kHz: (a) real part permeability; (b) imaginary part permeability.
Metals 08 00702 g008
Figure 9. Resistivity of the composite compacts with different ferrite contents.
Figure 9. Resistivity of the composite compacts with different ferrite contents.
Metals 08 00702 g009
Figure 10. Core loss of the composite with different ferrite contents dependence on frequency at 0.05 T: (a) total core loss; (b) hysteresis core loss; (c) eddy current core loss.
Figure 10. Core loss of the composite with different ferrite contents dependence on frequency at 0.05 T: (a) total core loss; (b) hysteresis core loss; (c) eddy current core loss.
Metals 08 00702 g010
Table 1. Magnetic parameters for Fe, Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4, Fe3O4, and MnZnFe2O4.
Table 1. Magnetic parameters for Fe, Fe/Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O4, Fe3O4, and MnZnFe2O4.
SampleMs (A·m2/kg)Mr (A·m2/kg)Mr/Ms
Fe2208.520.0387
Fe3O484.18.170.0971
MnZnFe2O433.25.400.163
Fe/1 wt. % Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O42160.5070.00235
Fe/2 wt. % Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O42140.3050.00143
Fe/4 wt. % Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O42120.1220.000575
Fe/6 wt. % Fe3O4-MnZnFe2O42070.09880.000477
Table 2. DC performance and density for composites with different ferrite percentage.
Table 2. DC performance and density for composites with different ferrite percentage.
Fe3O4 Content (wt. %)MnZnFe2O4 Content (wt. %)Density (g·cm−3)Maximum Relative PermeabilityMagnetic Induction (T)Br (T)Hc (Oe)
007.56358.21.881.1726.5
0.50.57.35263.71.810.2637.7
117.12243.21.760.2468.1
226.98227.31.740.2138.9
336.92187.61.700.17611.4

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, Y.; Yan, P.; Yan, B. Enhanced Soft Magnetic Properties of Iron-Based Powder Cores with Co-Existence of Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 Nanoparticles. Metals 2018, 8, 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8090702

AMA Style

Xie Y, Yan P, Yan B. Enhanced Soft Magnetic Properties of Iron-Based Powder Cores with Co-Existence of Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 Nanoparticles. Metals. 2018; 8(9):702. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8090702

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Yuye, Pengfei Yan, and Biao Yan. 2018. "Enhanced Soft Magnetic Properties of Iron-Based Powder Cores with Co-Existence of Fe3O4–MnZnFe2O4 Nanoparticles" Metals 8, no. 9: 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8090702

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop