Next Article in Journal
Microstructural Features and Mechanical Properties of Laser–MIG Hybrid Welded–Brazed Ti/Al Butt Joints with Different Filler Wires
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of Solid Products Formed During the Cathodic Decomposition of Chalcopyrite at Different Energetic Conditions in Acetic Acid
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advances in Corrosion and Protection of Materials (Second Edition)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Corrosion Resistance Behavior of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT Magnesium Nanocomposites Synthesized by Ultrasonication-Assisted Hybrid Stir–Squeeze Casting for Sacrificial Anode Applications

by
S. C. Amith
1,
Poovazhagan Lakshmanan
2,
Gnanavelbabu Annamalai
3,
Manoj Gupta
4,* and
Arunkumar Thirugnanasambandam
1,*
1
Centre for Sustainable Materials and Surface Metamorphosis, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai 600069, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai 603110, India
3
Department of Industrial Engineering, CEG Campus, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117575, Singapore
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2025, 15(6), 673; https://doi.org/10.3390/met15060673
Submission received: 8 May 2025 / Revised: 11 June 2025 / Accepted: 13 June 2025 / Published: 17 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Corrosion and Protection of Materials (Third Edition))

Abstract

The influence of multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) reinforcements on electrochemical corrosion investigations at varying NaCl concentrations (0.4 M, 0.6 M, 0.8 M, 1 M) of Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposites is studied in this work. The Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites were developed by using an ultrasonication-assisted hybrid stir–squeeze (UHSS) casting method with different MWCNT concentrations (0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2 wt.%) in a Mg-Zn-Ce magnesium alloy matrix. The microstructural characterizations shown using X-ray diffraction revealed the presence of secondary phases (MgZn2, Mg12Ce), T-phase (Mg7Zn3RE), α-Mg, and MWCNT peaks. Optical microscopy results showed grain refinement in the case of nanocomposites. Transmission electron microscope studies revealed well-dispersed MWCNT, indicating the good selection of processing parameters. The uniform dispersion of MWCNTs was achieved due to a hybrid stirring mechanism along with transient cavitation, ultrasonic streaming, and squeeze effect. The higher Ecorr value of −1.39 V, lower Icorr value (5.81 µA/cm2), and lower corrosion rate of 0.1 mm/Yr (↑77%) were obtained by 0.8% nanocomposite at 0.4 M NaCl concentration, when compared to the monolithic alloy. The Mg(OH)2 passive film formation on 0.8 wt.% nanocomposite was denser, attributed to the refined grains. At higher NaCl concentration, the one-dimensional morphological advantage of MWCNT helped to act as a barrier for further Mg exposure to excessive Cl attack, which reduced the formation of MgCl2. Therefore, the UHSS-casted Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites present a good potential as sacrificial anodes for use in a wide range of industrial applications.

1. Introduction

Magnesium (Mg) metal is the least dense material that is used in automobile, aerospace, marine, and electronics applications. Magnesium alloys have comparable strength, a high strength-to-weight ratio, excellent castability, are environmentally friendly, and are naturally available in abundance [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Apart from the structural application of magnesium alloys due to their good mechanical properties, the lack of corrosion resistance leads to limiting the usage of Mg alloys in corrosive atmospheres [12]. However, their application as sacrificial anodes is possible due to the high reactivity of magnesium metal when compared to all other metals. The metals being used in places such as aqueous medium, marine environments, buried underground in moist soil, and chemical industries need to be protected from corrosion environments; thus, the use of magnesium alloy over these metal surfaces is suitable for cathodic protection [13]. Some of the large-scale applications of metals that need cathodic protection are in oil and gas industries (offshore platforms and underwater gas pipelines), ship hulls, underground water pipelines, etc. Cathodic protection can also be applied in domestic applications such as for protecting the inner walls of water heaters, domestic gas pipelines, and storage tanks, etc. Thus, the efficiency of the magnesium sacrificial anodes needs to be improved to achieve a better life span.
The passivating film layer that is formed on the magnesium surface is the key factor that decides the corrosion resistance in different electrolyte media [14]. The pure Mg is generally corroded evenly throughout the surface, with some localized corrosion. The corrosion behavior usually varies even in the same composition of metals due to the crystallographic plane orientation, defects in packing density, and porosity formed by casting. The corrosion behavior of high-purity magnesium is considered a benchmark for comparing the corrosion rates of Mg alloys. The corrosion rate of high-purity magnesium was evaluated as ~0.38 mm/y, for a 3.5 wt.% NaCl environment [14]. However, pure magnesium cannot be used for practical applications as it has poor mechanical properties; hence, alloying elements are added for enhancement [1]. The corrosion resistance of magnesium alloys could be improved by the selection of appropriate alloying elements and the addition of additives in the electrolytes [15].
Generally, magnesium alloys have poor passive layer formation due to the presence of solute elements, which form as secondary phases, and these secondary phases cause localized corrosion by the formation of a galvanic pair with the Mg matrix [16]. Another issue with respect to corrosion of magnesium alloys is the unstable passive layer, which is dissolved easily by chemical interactions and exposes Mg metal for pitting corrosion. The majority of the studies on various magnesium alloys, such as AM, AZ, and Zx (x-K,RE,C) series, have already established their corrosive behavior [17]. However, some studies have shown increased corrosion resistance of Mg alloys by adding rare earth (RE) elements like cerium, which created a passive layer film on the material’s surface and resisted anodic dissolution [18]. The zinc (Zn)-added Mg alloys showed refined grains and enhanced mechanical properties, with a maximum 4 wt.% of Zn giving optimized properties [19]. The solution heat treatment processes can hinder the anodic dissolution by reducing the quantities of secondary phases in the Mg alloys [20]. Surface modifications like hot rolling and sputtering of alloying elements have produced passivated Mg alloys [14,21]. Zhang et al. added an intermetallic Ca-Mg-Sn phase to an AZ31 alloy to improve the refinement of grains [22]. Grain refinement has a major effect in controlling the passive layer formation over the surface of the material. Many other researchers have enhanced the corrosion resistance properties of magnesium alloy by refining the grains using processing techniques such as friction stir processing and equal channel angular pressing [21,23].
Similarly, the addition of ceramic and oxide nanoparticle reinforcements in magnesium alloys has illustrated potential advantages in improving the strength and corrosion resistance properties [24]. The corrosion studies of AZ31 reinforced with carbon nanotubes (CNT) nanocomposites showed that the CNT particles have formed a galvanic couple with magnesium, and hence, the corrosion has increased. However, the author suggested that the uniform distribution of reinforcing CNT particles might improve the corrosion resistance of the nanocomposite [25]. Similarly, many researchers have incorporated CNT particles into different magnesium alloys using various solid-state and liquid-state processing routes [26]. The fabrication processes are selected based on the application and quantity of nanocomposite production. The major issues related to the successful fabrication of nanocomposites include agglomeration and heterogeneously distributed CNT reinforcements in the Mg matrix, interface bonding of Mg and CNT, and improper fabrication parameters. The wettability issues of the Mg matrix and the reinforcements are attributed to the agglomeration of CNT particles in the liquid processing method, such as stir casting [27]. Therefore, the ultrasonication-assisted liquid-state processing of Mg alloy with CNT particles has the potential scope of research to rectify the above-stated issues [28]. Various studies have reported that the strength of magnesium metal is improved by adding zinc; the creep properties up to 150 °C are enhanced by incorporating rare earth elements (RE) (such as La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Y, etc.) and the refinement of grains is achieved through the influence of Zr. Similarly, the corrosion studies for each magnesium alloy and their nanocomposite differ due to the formation of complex corrosion mechanisms. Thus, further studies are required with respect to the corrosion behavior, as newer nanocomposites are being developed.
The characteristics of sacrificial anode materials for a wide range of applications should provide good resistance to corrosion for varying NaCl concentration environments and even in elevated working conditions. This requirement could be satisfied by rare-earth-alloyed magnesium, as it possesses good mechanical properties; thus, Mg-Zn-Ce is selected as the matrix material. Similarly, the multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) is equivalent to a one-dimensional structure due to its large aspect ratio, and also has a high strength-to-weight ratio, along with good flexibility. The density of the MWCNT is comparable to a magnesium alloy; hence, it is used as reinforcing material. The combined advantages of the Mg-Zn-Ce alloy, different MWCNT weight percentage, and a liquid-state fabrication process using an ultrasonication-assisted hybrid stir–squeeze (UHSS) casting technique, synergistically, has not been researched yet with respect to the corrosion behavior in varying low to high NaCl concentrations. Therefore, in this present study, the different weight percentages (0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 wt.%) of MWCNT in the Mg-Zn-Ce alloy matrix are synthesized using the UHSS casting technique. The successful fabrication of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites was ensured by X-ray diffraction, optical microscopy, and TEM. Following this, the electrochemical corrosion studies (open circuit polarization, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, potentiodynamic polarization) of the developed nanocomposite were conducted in various NaCl molar concentrations (0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1 M). The SEM characterization of corroded samples was conducted to understand the corrosion mechanism. Therefore, this research explores the feasibility of using the proposed magnesium nanocomposites as sacrificial anodes for a wide range of industrial applications.

2. Experimental

2.1. Matrix and Reinforcement Details

The matrix material selected for this study was a Mg-Zn-Ce alloy, and its chemical composition is given in Table 1, as characterized by atomic emission spectroscopy. The reinforcing nanoparticles used in this nanocomposite synthesis are multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), which were procured from Nanoshel UK Limited (Congleton, Cheshire, UK), with density of 1.2 g/cm3 and a purity of >90%. They have a very high L/D ratio (length, 3–8 µm, and diameter, 10–20 nm), and therefore could be considered as one-dimensional structured nanoparticles. The transmission electron microscope (TEM) images, energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) graphs of MWCNT particles are depicted in Figure 1a–c. In Figure 1b, it can be seen that EDS shows that no impurities were present within the procured MWCNT particles. However, since the MWCNT particles were placed in a copper grid for TEM characterization, the presence of Cu and small O peaks are shown in Figure 1b, which should not be considered as impurities. The XRD pattern of MWCNTs exhibits a prominent (002) diffraction peak near 2θ = 26°, indicative of graphitic stacking, along with a weaker (100) peak around 2θ = 43°, corresponding to the in-plane graphitic structure. The broad nature of these peaks reflects the nanocrystalline nature of the multi-walled carbon nanotubes. These XRD results are consistent with previously reported patterns, confirming the good quality of MWCNT reinforcements [29].

2.2. Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT Nanocomposites Synthesis

The synthesis of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites was carried out using the UHSS casting technique. This process includes initial mechanical stirring, followed by an ultrasonication process, and finally, hybrid stirring of the nanocomposite melt. The actual casting machine used in this work is shown in Figure 2a; the components of this casting machine include a closed induction furnace, ultrasonication processor, mechanical stirring setup with axial movement, reinforcement feeder coupled with preheater and ultrasonication transducer, semi-automatic bottom pouring mechanism, preheated runner, and hydraulic squeezer. The Mg-Zn-Ce matrix alloy was charged into the closed induction furnace at 790 °C, and the melt shielding was provided by SF6 and Ar gas in a ratio of 1:9 and a flow rate of 1.5 Lpm. The MWCNTs were added in a ratio of 0 wt.%, 0.4 wt.%, 0.8 wt.%, and 1.2 wt.% into the magnesium matrix at 250 °C preheated condition, to increase the wettability. The MWCNTs were fed into the molten melt by an ultrasonication induced feeder, and simultaneously, the melt was mechanically stirred at 450 rpm for 10 min. Immediately after the mechanical stirring, the ultrasonic probe was introduced for 5 min at 2500 W power and 20,000 Hz frequency to properly disperse the MWCNT into the molten melt. The transient bubble formation and implosion near the probe surface help the agglomerated MWCNTs break into individual particles. Then, the acoustic streaming effect transfers the individual MWCNT particles to every corner of the crucible. Lastly, in hybrid stirring, the molten melt was stirred below the vortex shearing effect at 50 rpm, and simultaneously, the mechanical stirrer was vertically moved up and down for 250 mm inside the crucible. The bottom pouring gate valve was opened just after initiating the hybrid stirring. The nanocomposite melt flowed through the 600 °C preheated runner and was poured into the cylindrical mold for squeezing. The squeeze pressure of 140 MPa was applied immediately on the nanocomposite sample, and the pressure was held for 3 min to ensure complete densification. The IVIUM electrochemical workstation is shown in Figure 2b.
The microstructural investigations of the magnesium nanocomposites were characterized by optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The corroded sample’s surface morphology was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS).

2.3. Corrosion Studies

The corrosion behavior of the Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposites at different NaCl concentrations (Table 2) was studied using an IVIUM electrochemical potentiostat. Electrochemical measurements were performed using an IVIUM Vertex C potentiostat, featuring a compliance range of ±350 mA/±13 V and an applied scan range of ±10 V. The system offers high-resolution data acquisition at 300 kHz and supports a wide current range from 100 pA to 100 mA, with a minimum resolution of 3 fA. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) test has frequency ranges of 10 μHz to 1 MHz. The corrosion samples with the dimension of 20 × 20 × 5 mm were extracted from the casted nanocomposites and then polished till 0.15 µm surface roughness. The electrochemical instrument consisted of a Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposite sample as the working electrode, platinum counter electrode, and saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE), having potential of 0.241 V(SHE), as shown in Figure 2b. The open circuit polarization (OCP) values were measured for the nanocomposites, which were submerged in NaCl electrolytes for up to 40 min. The nanocomposite samples were tested for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) at room temperature (30 °C), after the electrochemical system was stabilized. The equivalent circuits corresponding to the EIS data were fitted and simulated using IVIUM software version 4.962. The phase analysis of nanocomposites was conducted using the Bode plots. The Nyquist plots were obtained by sweeping frequency in the range of 105 to 10−1 Hz, with an amplitude of 10 mV. The potentiodynamic polarization tests were conducted at a 2 mV/s scan rate and 1 V scan range. The Tafel plot was used to determine the corrosion rate derived from Ecorr and Icorr values of the nanocomposites at varying NaCl concentration solutions. Finally, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis of corroded samples was investigated, and the mechanism of corrosion was explained.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructural Analysis

Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the Mg-Zn-Ce alloy, with Mg as the base element (93.93 wt.%) and Zn, Ce, and RE as key alloying elements, along with trace impurities. Figure 1a–c highlight the structural features of MWCNTs. The TEM image clearly shows their entangled, tube-like morphology, whereas the EDS spectrum reveals that carbon is the dominant element, with small copper signals possibly arising from the TEM grid. The XRD pattern displays separate (002) and (100) peaks, which indicate the graphitic structure present in multiwalled carbon nanotubes.
The grain size reduction is evident in the magnesium nanocomposites synthesized by UHSS casting, as depicted in the optical microscope images, Figure 3a–d. The reduction in grain size is proportional to the increase in MWCNT particles added in the Mg-Zn-Ce matrix. The monolithic alloy has the largest average grain size (AGS) of 104 µm when compared to other nanocomposites, as inferred from the optical microscope images. In 0.4% nanocomposites (AGS-65 µm), the combination of larger grains and smaller grains is visible, which suggests that the MWCNT-induced grain pinning effect is not adequate. The most uniform-looking refined grains (AGS-46 µm) and the least-thick grain boundaries are present in the 0.8% nanocomposite, as seen in Figure 3c. The 1.2% nanocomposites have the smallest grain size of 37 µm (Figure 3d); however, the porosities are visible as darker zones in the grain boundaries. The darker regions at the grain boundaries of 1.2% might also be attributed to agglomeration of MWCNT nanoparticles due to inadequate processing parameters [26]. The densities of the nanocomposites were measured using Archimedes’ principle, and the porosity percentage was calculated. The base alloy showed a theoretical density of 1.8 g/cm3 and an experimental density of 1.72 g/cm3 with 4.3% porosity. With 0.4 wt.% MWCNT, the theoretical density was 1.79 g/cm3, and the experimental density was 1.72 g/cm3 at 3.8% porosity. For 0.8 wt.% MWCNT, the values were 1.79 g/cm3 and 1.75 g/cm3 with 2.1% porosity. Lastly, the 1.2 wt.% MWCNT composite had a theoretical density of 1.78 g/cm3 and an experimental density of 1.73 g/cm3 at 3.2% porosity. The 0.8% nanocomposite obtained the highest density when compared to all other nanocomposites, which is due to the presence of MWCNT, which enhanced densification. The density of MWCNTs (1.2 g/cm3) is lower than that of magnesium alloy (1.8 g/cm3), but it is closer to that of regular ceramic reinforcements. This lower density contributes to maintaining the lightweight nature of the nanocomposite but is not the primary factor in selecting MWCNTs as reinforcement. The MWCNTs are selected due to their exceptional mechanical strength, high aspect ratio, one-dimensional morphology, reinforcement particle size, high melting point, and thermal stability, along with their density compatibility. The addition of one-dimensional MWCNTs in the Mg-Zn-Ce matrix has initiated multiple nucleation sites and a grain pinning effect, which is the major reason for the grain refinement. Therefore, as the MWCNT concentration increases, the grain size is refined. The interfacial bonding, dispersion behavior, grain refinement by pinning, increased nucleation sites, and good interfacial bonding of MWCNT with the magnesium nanocomposites were the major contributions to the enhanced microstructural changes. The brighter regions are α-Mg primary phase, and the dark-colored spots within the grains are secondary phases, MgZn2. The ternary phases, Mg7Zn3RE, are mainly present at the grain boundaries [23]. Similarly, the Mg17Ce2 and Mg12Ce phases are also present as secondary phases in the magnesium matrix, with a globular morphology [30].
The XRD peaks of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites are represented in Figure 4. The Mg7Zn3RE, MgZn2, and Mg12Ce secondary phases are observed in the XRD peaks of all the nanocomposites and monolithic material. These phases are observed and correlated with those of optical microscope images. The intensities of these peaks are increasing as the weight percentage of MWCNT added in the Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposites, which is attributed to the quantity of secondary phases and their texture changes that happen due to grain refinement [18]. Additionally, the MWCNT peak is present at 26°; however, the intensity of the peak is substantially less compared to that of Mg phases.
The TEM microstructures of the Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites are shown in Figure 5a,b. The unbounded MWCNT particles, which have no reactive byproducts or interfacial defects, are depicted in Figure 5a. The needle-shaped MgZn2 phases are smaller in size and are present near the MWCNT particles [31]. The reduction in the size of secondary phases is attributed to the thermal diffusivity of Z1 near the MWCNT. However, as seen in Figure 5b, the dislocation arrays are formed due to the thermal mismatch of α-Mg phases and MWCNT. The dislocations also generate more quantities of secondary phases, such as MgZn2 and Mg12Ce. Therefore, the addition of MWCNT as reinforcement in the Mg-Zn-Ce matrix has increased the quantities of secondary phases, which could be correlated to the increase in XRD peak intensities of higher concentration nanocomposites.

3.2. Corrosion Results

Table 2 presents the composition details of Mg-Zn-Ce-based nanocomposites reinforced with varying weight percentages of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), specifically 0.4 wt.%, 0.8 wt.%, and 1.2 wt.%. These nanocomposites, along with the base alloy (0% MWCNT), were subjected to electrochemical corrosion tests in different NaCl electrolyte concentrations, 0.4 M, 0.6 M, 0.8 M, and 1 M, to evaluate their corrosion behavior under varying chloride ion environments.
The open circuit potential (OCP) of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites with respect to time (2400 s), while immersed in the NaCl solutions having four different concentrations, is illustrated in Figure 6a–d. In the 0.4 M NaCl concentration, the 0% nanocomposite exhibited the lowest potential value of −1.59 V, with minimum variations with respect to time. Similarly, the monolithic alloy has the lowest potential value (−1.787 V at 1 M NaCl) when compared to all other nanocomposites tested under different NaCl concentrations, which is due to the large grain size and presence of larger α-Mg phases that create corrosion by galvanic action [12].
The incorporation of MWCNT has increased the positive potential values of the nanocomposites, and the highest average positive potential value of −1.541 V was achieved for the 0.8% nanocomposite at 0.4 M NaCl. The OCP values ranged from 1.601 V to −1.593 V at 0.6 M NaCl for 0% to 0.8% nanocomposite, respectively.
The grain refinement and shielding effect of MWCNT have improved the corrosion resistance of the nanocomposites. The nanocomposites initiated oxide formation as soon as they were exposed to the NaCl electrolyte, and hence, the corrosion resistance of the nanocomposites gradually increased. This phenomenon was represented by the increase in positive potential values when compared at the initial and final exposure times. Also, the time taken by each composition of nanocomposites to become a stable potential varies, depending upon the different corrosion mechanisms it is undergoing [32].
A similar positively increasing trend was obtained for the nanocomposites tested in the 0.6 M NaCl concentration electrolyte, where the 0.8% nanocomposite had the least positive potential of −1.593 V and −1.601 V for the monolithic Mg-Zn-Ce alloy. In the higher NaCl concentrations (0.8 M and 1 M), the passivation of nanocomposites was stable up to 1200 s, and further exposure of the material’s surface to the NaCl electrolyte till 2400 s has deteriorated the oxide film, and the potential values decreased. The nanocomposite corrosion behavior at higher concentrations of NaCl is different when compared to lower concentrations. Furthermore, the stable OCP values of −1.787 V, −1.638 V, −1.599 V, and −1.614 V were attained for 0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% nanocomposites, respectively, at 1 M NaCl concentration. This is notable from all the OCP values at different NaCl concentration electrolytes, with the nanocomposite having 0.8 wt.% of MWCNT in Mg-Zn-Ce alloy matrix displaying the highest positive potential when compared to other materials. However, the OCP value should not be directly correlated to the corrosion resistance, as it only provides thermodynamics for the corrosion system. Therefore, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and potentiodynamic polarization of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites were analyzed as follows.
The Nyquist plots of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites corroded at different NaCl concentrations (0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1 M) are illustrated in Figure 7a–d. The EIS spectra studies were performed at ambient room temperature at 28 °C. The arc diameters of the Nyquist plots are correlated with the electron flow from the surface of the tested materials immersed in the electrolyte, and hence, the corrosion mechanism could be identified using these capacitive loops. The larger capacitive arc is generally derived from the materials with good corrosion resistance that are not losing electrons. [33]. Similarly, the pattern of Nyquist plots also varies based on the mechanism of corrosion in a particular material. In this study, the Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites showed both single-loop as well as two capacitive loops in the Nyquist plot, which are attributed to the higher, mid, and lower frequencies. The Nyquist plot of 0.4 wt.% Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposite in 0.6 M NaCl (Figure 7e) demonstrates evident inductive character in the low-frequency range, and the fitted equivalent circuit with an inductive component correctly captures the same. The same inductive loops were also noticed for other nanocomposites under varying NaCl concentrations (0.4 M, 0.8 M, and 1 M), signifying that the inductive behavior is a general tendency in these magnesium-based nanocomposites, most probably due to localized corrosion activities and surface film formation/dissolution dynamics.
The single-loop Nyquist plot is formed in the higher frequency (hf) range, where the material is subjected to electrochemical reactions and the resistive impedance offered by the material during Mg dissolution, whereas the higher and mid-frequency (mf) are linked to the two capacitive loops. The secondary loop is linked to medium frequency, where the Mg2+ ions are diffused over countering the oxide layers. The lower frequency provides the stability of the electrochemical reaction and dynamics of Mg(OH)2 corrosion elements.
In the Nyquist plots shown in Figure 7a–d, the semicircle arc representing the Mg-Zn-Ce monolithic alloy is noted as 0%, displaying the smallest diameter when compared to all other nanocomposites tested in all the low and high NaCl concentrations. The Mg2+ ions are formed at the anode, and the mass transfer is highest for the monolithic alloy. Therefore, the surface of the monolithic alloys exhibits high material removal, attributed to the larger surface area of α-Mg [7]. The Mg-Zn-Ce/0.8 wt.%MWCNT nanocomposites, represented as 0.8%, have comparatively lesser quantities of magnesium α phases due to the presence of refined grains. The arc diameter of nanocomposites is highest for 0.8% nanocomposites when compared to all other compositions of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites. A similar large pattern of arc was achieved in all the NaCl concentrations for the 0.8% nanocomposite. However, in all the NaCl concentrations, the 1.2% Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposite arc diameter is lower when compared to the 0.8% nanocomposite, which suggests that the electron transfer rate was higher in 1.2% than in 0.8% nanocomposite.
The MWCNT has enhanced the grain refinement by acting as the nucleation point inside the Mg-Zn-Ce melt, thus the dendritic growth of α-Mg starts. However, the dendritic growth adheres to the adjacent MWCNT particles present in the molten nanocomposite melt. Therefore, the grains formed in the 0.8% nanocomposites are finer grains when compared to all other nanocomposites (0.4 and 1.2%). The solute element phases are present mainly in the grain boundaries and as some intergranular precipitates. Similarly, the MWCNTs are distributed evenly in the Mg-Zn-Ce matrix and grain boundaries. The large semicircle Nyquist arc of 0.8% nanocomposite in all NaCl concentrations corresponds to lesser electron loss as the formation of denser passive oxide films is present on the nanocomposite surface. The Mg(OH)2 passive films are uniformly formed in 0.8% nanocomposite and are higher in quantity when compared to the monolithic alloy, as the presence of finer grains has created many chemically active diffusion regions for the formation of oxides.
The process of corrosion in the Mg-Zn-Ce alloy in the NaCl solution is characterized by active corrosion with localized pitting. Magnesium alloys in a chloride medium are quickly dissolved by chloride ions. Magnesium rapidly undergoes anodic dissolution, facilitating the evolution of H2 in cathodic locations, as given in below equation. The diminutive semicircles in Nyquist plot indicate less corrosion resistance.
M g   M g 2 + + 2 e                                 ( a n o d i c )
2 H 2 O + 2 e     H 2 + 2 O H                     ( c a t h o d i c )
M g 2 + + 2 O H   M g ( O H ) 2
Whereas the Mg-Zn-Ce alloy with 0.4% MWCNT demonstrates a somewhat improved barrier effect, the MWCNT dispersed throughout the matrix reduces the defect channel and results in a denser passive film. The arc of the Nyquist plot is quite extensive, indicating that the enhanced film in the Mg-Zn-Ce alloy containing 0.8% MWCNT exhibits exceptional passivation and corrosion resistance. MWCNT was uniformly distributed under these conditions, enhancing film stability and obstructing the inclusion of chloride ions by augmenting the protective qualities of film formation, which leads to a large arc in the Nyquist plot. The Mg-Zn-Ce alloy with 1.2% MWCNT permits partial corrosion due to CNT aggregation. This aggregation leads to film imperfections or localized galvanic corrosion. A reduction in arc width indicates protection below 0.8%. The effect of the mechanism of corrosion in the base Mg-Zn-Ce alloy towards the addition of MWCNT in various proportions with reference to the Nyquist plot is discussed in Figure 8.
The passive layer formations in the nanocomposites are degraded by a higher concentration of NaCl. Therefore, more Mg2+ ions are released through the passive layer breaking point. Finally, the MgCl2 compounds are formed due to the reaction between Mg2+ and large quantities of Cl. The surface degradation and formation of localized corrosion pits are highest for the monolithic Mg-Zn-Ce alloy, followed by 0.4%, 1.2%, and 0.8% nanocomposites. These results are attributed to the diameter of the capacitive loops derived from the Nyquist plots for the nanocomposites, and the corresponding high-frequency resistance (Rhf) plots are shown in Figure 9.
The high-frequency resistance is inversely proportional to the rate of corrosion [33]. Thus, the comparison of Rhf values within the same composition of nanocomposites has shown a decrease in Rhf values as the NaCl concentration is increased from 0.4 M to 1 M. The highest value of resistance is achieved in the lowest NaCl concentration; therefore, the passive layers are protected from the Cl attack.
The frequency response of the magnesium nanocomposites exposed in the NaCl electrolytes system is analyzed by the Bode magnitude plot and phase diagram, as received from the IVIUM software, as shown in Figure 10a–h, in addition to the EIS data for a higher understanding of corrosion behavior [33]. In the 0.8% nanocomposite, the magnitude plot shows almost constant amplitude at higher frequency regimes irrespective of the NaCl concentrations. Similarly, the phase plot corresponding to 0.8% nanocomposites has attained the peak value at the midway frequency. Thus, the oxide passive layers had reduced the flow of current at mid and higher frequencies. However, above 0.6 M NaCl concentration, the magnitude slightly varies for the 0.8% nanocomposite at midway and low frequency. The oxide layers deteriorate to expose fresh magnesium surface, and again a small amount of passivation is achieved from the obstructive layer of MWCNT, which resists further α-Mg movement. This also corresponds to the two capacitive loops, as shown in the EIS spectra of the 0.8% nanocomposite, Figure 7c,d.
The near-zero degrees were attained by all the nanocomposites at a lower frequency and approximately −150° peak phase value at the midway frequency. The nanocomposites have resistance behavior at low frequency and capacitive behavior at mid-frequency. The nanocomposites exposed in 0.4 M and 0.6 M NaCl concentration showed an approximate phase value of −100° at higher frequency, whereas in 0.8 M and 1 M conditions, the phase value was reduced to an average of −50° phase angle. The phase angle values at 0.4 M and 0.6 M conditions in hf zone have capacitive behavior, where the oxide layer domination is higher and material removal is comparatively lesser. Furthermore, in higher NaCl concentration conditions (0.8 M and 1 M), the phase angle values at the hf zone have a transition effect from capacitance to resistance. This transition indicates the aggressive chlorine attack in the oxide layer, which causes depletion, and a few micro-passivations due to the presence of MWCNT nano-reinforcements.
The Bode magnitude and phase plots are fitted in corresponding equivalent circuits based on the above understanding. The constant phase element (CPE), charge transfer resistance (Rt), and solution resistance (Rs) are attributed to single-loop EIS spectra, as depicted in Figure 7a. Similarly, the equivalent circuit for two-loop EIS spectra, as shown in Figure 7b, corresponds to the CPE-1 and CPE-2, which are constant phase elements and the charge transfer resistance (Rt) and protective film resistance (Rp), respectively.
The potentiodynamic polarization plots of the Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites exposed in 0.4 M to 1 M NaCl concentrations are displayed in Figure 11a–d, and their corresponding Ecorr, Icorr, and corrosion rates are noted in Table 3. The anodic and cathodic reactions could be understood by using these Tafel plots, and the corrosion behavior of the nanocomposites is also analyzed. The magnesium ions are formed by releasing the valence electrons on the left side of the Tafel plot, which represents the anodic dissolution process, whereas the hydrogen evolution takes place on the cathodic right side of the Tafel curve. From Figure 11a, the monolithic alloy has obtained the lowest Ecorr value of −1.53 V and corresponding Icorr value of 28.8 µA/cm2, which was highest among all other MWCNT reinforced nanocomposites exposed to 0.4 M NaCl concentration. The corrosion rate (0.43 mm/Year) of the monolithic alloy was highest in 0.4 M concentration, and a similar trend was achieved for the 0% sample tested in all NaCl concentrations when compared to MWCNT-reinforced nanocomposites. The OCP curves, as shown in Figure 6a–d are identical with the Tafel trends. These results could be attributed to the presence of lesser quantities of secondary phases in the base Mg-Zn-Ce alloy, which increased the Cl action over the passive layer and exposed the α-Mg due to inadequate resistance to corrosion offered by the secondary phases. Additionally, according to the Hall–Petch equation, the hardness of the samples is proportional to the grain size of a material [1,2,3,4,5]. Therefore, since the base alloy had the largest grain size, the corresponding hardness is comparatively lower than the nanocomposites. These factors are responsible for the reduction in corrosion resistance of the monolithic Mg-Zn-Ce alloy.
At a lower NaCl concentration of 0.4 M, the micro-galvanic effect due to the presence of secondary phases and MWCNT nanoparticles is negligible for all the nanocomposites, as seen from the smooth cathodic curve in Figure 11a. The Tafel plots derived from the nanocomposites exposed to higher NaCl concentrations (0.6 M, 0.8 M, and 1 M) have varying curve deviations, which suggest that multiple electrochemical reactions are undergoing at the surface of galvanic interactions. Similarly, the higher Cl ion concentration has increased the corrosion rate, which is attributed to the higher values of current density and smaller semicircle loop in Nyquist plots. However, the 0.8% nanocomposites have shown better corrosion resistance compared to all other nanocomposites in all the NaCl concentrations. The MWCNT has offered a barrier effect to the nanocomposites, which has reduced the corrosion rate. From Figure 11c,d, the 0.8% nanocomposite exposed to 0.8 M and 1 M has a non-linear cathodic curve, which suggests micro-galvanic reactions between the magnesium phase, MWCNT particles, and secondary precipitates.
The corrosion rate of nanocomposites exposed to varying NaCl concentrations has decreased with an increase in MWCNT concentration until 0.8 wt.%, and then a slight increase in corrosion rate was observed for the nanocomposites with 1.2 wt.% MWCNT. The high surface energy and heterogeneous nucleation sites provided by MWCNTs promote localized solute segregation and facilitate the precipitation of thermodynamically stable phases during solidification and thermal processing [34]. Therefore, the formation of MgZn2, Mg7Zn3RE, and other secondary phases are increased due to the presence of MWCNT particles. The MWCNT particle has a one-dimensional morphology, which has promoted grain refinement, and it simultaneously acts as a barrier to Mg2+ release. At higher concentrations of 0.6 M, 0.8 M, and 1 M, the corrosion rates are higher as the MgCl2 formation has increased from Mg(OH)2.
Pitting corrosion is a major degradation mechanism in magnesium nanocomposites, particularly in chloride-containing environments like physiological solutions. The addition of nanoparticles like SiC, Al2O3, CNTs, or graphene, besides improving mechanical properties, creates micro-galvanic couples because of differences in potential between the matrix and the reinforcements, which enhance anodic dissolution at the interface; hence, proper interface bonding is needed with the matrix material to reduce this galvanic couple effect [35]. Nanoparticle agglomeration and interfacial defects also act as favored locations for pit initiation by inducing microstructural heterogeneity and localized electrochemical activity. In addition, second phases or intermetallic compounds in the microstructure significantly affect localized corrosion by inducing galvanic effects [36]. Surface imperfections, residual stress, and uneven reinforcement distribution resulting from production methods like stir casting or friction stir processing also induce pit nucleation.
Processing techniques significantly impact the distribution of MWCNTs within the metal matrix, which in turn affects the corrosion behavior of the nanocomposites. Evenly dispersed MWCNTs can increase corrosion resistance by blocking the entry of corrosive substances and reducing micro-galvanic activity. However, poor processing can lead to MWCNT clustering, which creates localized galvanic cells and accelerates corrosion. Therefore, meticulous control of the production parameters is necessary to achieve a uniform MWCNT dispersion and superior corrosion performance.
The orientation, distribution, and interfacial bonding of MWCNTs are highly dependent on the processing method. The dispersion of MWCNTs also predominantly relies on the processing techniques like high-energy ball milling powder metallurgy, friction stir processing (FSP), ultrasonication-assisted casting, and spark plasma sintering (SPS). Among all these processing techniques, the process of casting is the only technique that can offer the maximum productivity with good particle dispersion, but agglomeration is still a problem that must be addressed [37]. Optimized parameter ultrasonication-assisted casting [15] can ensure homogenous dispersion and good interfacial bonding to yield the maximum barrier effect and minimize cathodic-induced pitting. Poor processing could, however, lead to agglomeration of MWCNTs and create cathodic-rich clusters that promote pitting corrosion.

3.3. Microstructural Analysis and Mechanism of Corrosion

The SEM backscattered electron (SEM-BSE) image of monolithic Mg-Zn-Ce alloy with an arrow mark representing T-phases in the grain boundary and SEM energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) of corroded 0.8 wt.% MWCNT nanocomposites at 0.4 M NaCl concentration are illustrated in Figure 12a,b. The light-colored regions in the SEM micrographs represent the grain boundaries, which consist of Mg-Zn-RE phases, both in the base alloy as well as in the nanocomposites, which are confirmed by the line EDS scan across the grain boundary. Similarly, the oxide formation is higher in the grain boundaries. Figure 12c,e depicts the SEM surface morphology of the UHSS-casted base Mg-Zn-Ce alloy, and similarly, Figure 12d,f corresponds to Mg-Zn-Ce/0.8 wt.%MWCNT nanocomposites at 0.4 M and 1 M NaCl concentration, respectively. The corrosion byproducts show the quantity of reactions taken place on the surface of the material due to corrosion. Hence, the influence of lower NaCl concentration in the 0.8% nanocomposites is significantly less when compared to the monolithic alloy, as shown in Figure 12c,d.
However, when the nanocomposites are exposed to higher NaCl concentrations of 1 M, the formation of the corrosive layer is thicker due to more chemical reactions at the material surface and the electrolyte interface. The Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposite showed multilayered passive film formations when it was exposed to the NaCl electrolyte. The oxide layer adjacent to the material’s surface forms a thinner, dense MgO layer, and the outer surface consists of Mg(OH)2, which is thicker and porous, as seen in Figure 12f. The material removal is more in the grain boundaries due to misoriented α-Mg forming Mg2+ ions easily during pitting corrosion. From the SEM surface morphology, it is evident that the grain size reduction of the 0.8% nanocomposite has improved the corrosion resistance of the material by lesser material removal from the grain boundaries, which might be attributed to the MWCNT barrier effect.
The Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites have an α-Mg phase, secondary phases (MgZn2, Mg12Ce, Mg17Ce2, Zr4Zn), Mg7Zn3RE (T-phase), and MWCNT particles. Generally, corrosion is influenced by the reactions between the magnesium phase (anode) and other secondary phases or particles (cathode), which form a micro-galvanic couple [33]. The corrosion behavior of the ZE41 alloy reinforced with MWCNT particles has complex corrosion mechanisms based on multiple factors, such as uniform distribution of MWCNT particles, formation of secondary phases, grain size of the nanocomposites, presence of agglomerated MWCNT particles, formation of micro-galvanic couple of cathodic MWCNT with magnesium alloys, placement of MWCNT particles within the grain or at the grain boundaries, Mg(OH)2 and MgO passive layer formations, the barrier effect of MWCNT, and NaCl concentration.
The schematic diagram of corrosion mechanism in Mg-Zn-Ce alloy and MWCNT reinforced nanocomposites exposed to the NaCl electrolyte is illustrated in Figure 13. Magnesium has the tendency to lose its two electrons and form magnesium ions (Mg2+), and therefore, the corresponding standard electrode potential is −2.37 V. Generally, magnesium has a steady state working potential in a range of 1.5 to 1.8 V when subject to NaCl solution with varying concentration. Initially, the magnesium nanocomposite is immersed in the NaCl electrolyte, and anodic dissolution takes place involving several reactions, to finally form magnesium hydroxide along with the release of hydrogen gas. The passive Mg(OH)2 layers are formed uniformly over the surface of the monolithic Mg-Zn-Ce alloy. The secondary phases present in the grain boundary act as highly reactive zones, and the formation of the passive layer is more likely to be near these zones. Therefore, the Mg(OH)2 film density is inversely proportional to the grain size of the nanocomposites. This oxide film restricts the further release of magnesium, and thus, an equilibrium state is reached. However, the nanocomposites are immersed in NaCl electrolyte, and hence the chlorine ions (Cl) aggressively interact with Mg(OH)2 layers and form MgCl2 salts.
The MWCNT particles present in the Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposites act as a cathode, and the Mg matrix as an anode; thus, they form a micro-galvanic couple. Since the length of MWCNT particles is on the micron scale, the pitting corrosion happens at the surface of the material due to the presence of MWCNT particles in the micron size. However, the MWCNTs have a one-dimensional morphology, and they are uniformly distributed in the Mg matrix due to ultrasonication-assisted hybrid stir–squeeze casting. The MWCNT forms a barrier to the Mg-matrix by not allowing the chlorine ion to disrupt the passive oxide layer. The grain refinement in the Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposites is higher as the MWCNT concentration is increased. The electrochemical reactions are homogeneously distributed over the nanocomposite surface due to the presence of MWCNT particles; thus, the corrosion rate is comparatively decreased.
Altogether, due to the coarse grain of a material exposed to NaCl electrolyte, the passive layer formations are porous when compared to the fine-grain materials. In a fine-grained nanocomposite, the presence of variably oriented phases in the grain boundary acts as highly reactive zones. These highly reactive zones tend to form passive layers faster and denser than the coarser material, having a properly oriented α-Mg phase [34]. Overall, the corrosion mechanism is mainly influenced by particle distribution and its corresponding effects in the magnesium nanocomposites.

4. Conclusions

Mg-Zn-Ce alloy-based nanocomposites with MWCNT reinforcements in four varying weight percentages (0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 wt.%) were developed using an ultrasonication-assisted hybrid stir–squeeze casting method. The electrochemical corrosion behavior of the synthesized nanocomposites at four different NaCl electrolytes (0.4 M, 0.6 M, 0.8 M, and 1 M) was analyzed. This study concluded the following:
  • The TEM images showed that unbounded MWCNT in 0.8 wt.% MWCNT reinforced Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposite, which is attributed to the homogeneously dispersed nanoparticles that were present due to a hybrid stirring mechanism along with transient cavitation, ultrasonic streaming, and squeeze effect. The formation of finer secondary phases and enhanced dislocations by MWCNT additions was also observed.
  • The refinement of grains in the synthesized nanocomposites was achieved by increasing the concentration of MWCNT in the magnesium alloy. However, in Mg-Zn-Ce/1.2 wt.% MWCNT, thicker grain boundaries with few porosities were present, as seen in the optical microscope images.
  • The presence of secondary phases (MgZn2, Mg12Ce), T-phase (Mg7Zn3RE), α-Mg, and MWCNT peaks was identified in the XRD for the Mg nanocomposites. The addition of MWCNT has not been introduced in the formation of any other phases, but the intensities of the peaks have increased as the quantities of secondary phases are influenced by MWCNT.
  • The study on electrochemical corrosion behavior of synthesized Mg nanocomposites at varying NaCl concentration showed that the MWCNT particles have improved corrosion resistance when compared to the monolithic alloy, as observed from the Nyquist plots having large capacitive loops. Based on the high frequency resistance values from the Nyquist plots, the nanocomposites increase resistance to corrosion in this arrangement: 0% < 0.4% < 1.2% < 0.8%.
  • In comparison to the base alloy, the 0.8% nanocomposite at 0.4 M NaCl concentration produced a reduced corrosion rate of 0.1 mm/Yr (↑77%), a lower Icorr value (5.81 µA/cm2), and a higher Ecorr value of −1.39 V.
  • The secondary phases present in the grain boundary act as highly reactive zones, and the formation of a passive layer is nearer these zones, as observed from the corroded 0.8% sample SEM-EDS images. The Mg(OH)2 passive films are uniformly formed in 0.8% nanocomposite and are denser when compared to the monolithic alloy. Also, the presence of finer grains has created many chemically active diffusion regions for the formation of oxides.
  • At 0.6 M, 0.8 M, and 1 M NaCl concentration, the corrosion rate of the 0.8% nanocomposite has 58%, 57%, and 48% improvement when compared to the UHSS-casted monolithic alloy, respectively. The corrosion rates of the base alloy are higher as the MgCl2 formation has increased due to excessive Cl attack on the passive Mg(OH)2 layer.
Overall, the Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites have good potential for sacrificial anode applications, as the MWCNT particle has one-dimensional morphology, which promotes the grain refinement by the pinning effect, and they simultaneously act as a barrier to the freshly exposed Mg surface and resist the further release of Mg2+ ions. The enhanced corrosion resistance was attributed to the multilayered and homogeneous denser passive layers in the synthesized nanocomposite than in the monolithic alloy when tested under a wide range of NaCl concentrations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.L. and A.T.; methodology, P.L.; software, G.A. and A.T.; validation, S.C.A., P.L., G.A., and M.G.; formal analysis, G.A.; resources, P.L., M.G., and A.T.; data curation, P.L., M.G., and A.T.; writing—original draft, S.C.A. and A.T.; writing—review and editing, S.C.A., P.L., and M.G.; project administration, M.G. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is partially funded by Centre for Sustainable Materials and Surface Metamorphosis, Chennai Institute of Technology, India, vide funding number CIT/CSMSM/2025/RP/004.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ramalingam, V.V.; Ramasamy, P.; Kovukkal, M.D.; Myilsamy, G. Research and development in magnesium alloys for industrial and biomedical applications: A review. Met. Mater. Int. 2020, 26, 409–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, H.; Xin, Y.; Wang, M.; Liu, Q. Hall-Petch relationship in Mg alloys: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2018, 34, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Prasad, S.S.; Prasad, S.B.; Verma, K.; Mishra, R.K.; Kumar, V.; Singh, S. The role and significance of Magnesium in modern day research-A review. J. Magnes. Alloys 2022, 10, 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mahalingam, M.; Lakshmanan, P.; Annamalai, G.; Krishnan, P. Tensile strength and immersion corrosion behavior of nano-ZnO, rare earth Gd reinforced Mg nanocomposites developed by novel stir ultrasonication process. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2024, 33, 1325–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Esmaily, M.; Svensson, J.E.; Fajardo, S.; Birbilis, N.; Frankel, G.S.; Virtanen, S.; Johansson, L.G. Fundamentals and advances in magnesium alloy corrosion. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 89, 92–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abazari, S.; Shamsipur, A.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Drelich, J.W.; Goldman, J.; Sharif, S.; Ismail, A.; Razzaghi, M. Magnesium-based nanocomposites: A review from mechanical, creep and fatigue properties. J. Magnes. Alloy 2023, 11, 2655–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gnanavelbabu, A.; Vinothkumar, E.; Prahadeeswaran, M. Investigation on corrosion behavior of metal oxide nanoparticles reinforced magnesium composites by salt spray and immersion corrosion test methods. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. 2024, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hassan, S.F.; Gupta, M. Development of high-performance magnesium nanocomposites using solidification processing route. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2004, 20, 1383–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fang, B.; Li, J.; Zhao, N.; Shi, C.; Ma, L.; He, C.; Liu, E. Enhanced interface interaction between modified carbon nanotubes and magnesium matrix. Compos. Interfaces 2018, 25, 1101–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Z.Y.; Xu, Q.Y.; Liu, B.C. Dendrite growth modelling of cast magnesium alloy. Int. J. Cast. Met. Res. 2007, 20, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, D.; Thakur, L. Investigation on mechanical and wear performance of Ultrasonic-assisted stir cast AZ91D/Al2O3 magnesium matrix composites. Met. Mater. Int. 2023, 29, 2767–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Song, G.L. Corrosion electrochemistry of magnesium (Mg) and its alloys. In Corrosion of Magnesium Alloys; Woodhead Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2011; pp. 3–65. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vaira Vignesh, R.; Sathiya, P. Sacrificial anode materials to protect marine grade steel structures: A review. Corros. Rev. 2024, 42, 303–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cao, F.; Song, G.L.; Atrens, A. Corrosion and passivation of magnesium alloys. Corros. Sci. 2016, 111, 835–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, G.; Tong, X.; Wang, C.; Jiang, R.; Ding, W. Recent advances on grain refinement of magnesium rare-earth alloys during the whole casting processes: A review. J. Magnes. Alloy 2023, 11, 3463–3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Makar, G.L.; Kruger, J.L. Corrosion of magnesium. Int. Mater. Rev. 1993, 38, 138–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shehadeh, M.; Hassan, I. Study of sacrificial cathodic protection on marine structures in sea and fresh water in relation to flow conditions. Ships Offshore Struct. 2013, 8, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cao, D.; Wu, L.; Wang, G.; Lv, Y. Electrochemical oxidation behavior of Mg–Li–Al–Ce–Zn and Mg–Li–Al–Ce–Zn–Mn in sodium chloride solution. J. Power Sources 2008, 183, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boehlert, C.J.; Knittel, K. The microstructure, tensile properties, and creep behavior of Mg–Zn alloys containing 0–4.4 wt.% Zn. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 417, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Neil, W.C.; Forsyth, M.; Howlett, P.C.; Hutchinson, C.R.; Hinton, B.R.W. Corrosion of heat treated magnesium alloy ZE41. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 3299–3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mohankumar, A.; Duraisamy, T.; Sampathkumar, D.; Sonar, T. Electrochemical corrosion performance of friction stir processed cold spray metal matrix composite coatings on AZ31B magnesium alloy under sodium chloride environment. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 2022, 10, 035010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, J.; Zhou, G.; Jiang, B.; Luo, A.; Zhao, X.; Tang, A.; Pan, F. A Novel Mg–CaMgSn Master Alloy for Grain Refinement in Mg–Al-Based Alloys. Metals 2021, 11, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Prithivirajan, S.; Narendranath, S.; Desai, V. Analysing the combined effect of crystallographic orientation and grain refinement on mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of ECAPed ZE41 Mg alloy. J. Magnes. Alloys 2020, 8, 1128–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tjong, S.C. Recent progress in the development and properties of novel metal matrix nanocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2013, 74, 281–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, C.D.; Wang, X.J.; Liu, W.Q.; Shi, H.L.; Ding, C.; Hu, X.S.; Zheng, M.; Wu, K. Effect of solidification on microstructures and mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes reinforced magnesium matrix composite. Mater. Des. 2014, 58, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Upadhyay, G.; Saxena, K.K.; Sehgal, S.; Mohammed, K.A.; Prakash, C.; Dixit, S.; Buddhi, D. Development of carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced Mg alloys: Fabrication routes and mechanical properties. Metals 2022, 12, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bakshi, S.R.; Agarwal, A. An analysis of the factors affecting strengthening in carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composites. Carbon 2011, 49, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Packkirisamy, V.; Sundaramurthy, R.; Mohankumar, A.; Sonar, T. Tribological and electrochemical corrosion behavior of binary Mg–3Zn novel hybrid composites for biodegradable implant applications. Mater. Test. 2024, 66, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Das, R.; Hamid, S.; Ali, M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Yongzhi, W. Carbon Nanotubes Characterization by X-ray Powder Diffraction—A Review. Curr. Nanosci. 2014, 11, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, T.; Xia, H.; Chen, Z.H. Effect of Ce on microstructures and mechanical properties of rapidly solidified Mg–Zn alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2011, 27, 1198–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hou, J.; Du, W.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Liu, K.; Du, X. Combination of enhanced thermal conductivity and strength of MWCNTs reinforced Mg-6Zn matrix composite. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 838, 155573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fletcher, S. Tables of degenerate electrical networks for use in the equivalent-circuit analysis of electrochemical systems. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1994, 141, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dinodi, N.; Shetty, A.N. Electrochemical investigations on the corrosion behavior of magnesium alloy ZE41 in a combined medium of chloride and sulphate. J. Magnes. Alloys 2013, 1, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ralston, K.D.; Birbilis, N. Effect of grain size on corrosion: A review. Corrosion 2010, 66, 075005-1–075005-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Amith, S.C.; Lakshmanan, P.; Annamalai, G.; Arunkumar, T. Elevated Temperature Tribological Analysis and Mechanical Behavior of Ultrasonication-Assisted Stir-Squeeze-Casted ZE41–MWCNT Magnesium Nanocomposites. Int. J. Met. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, J.; Liu, H.; Liu, L.; Guo, C.; Yang, L.; Li, J.; Wang, J. Effect of aluminum and zinc on the corrosion behavior of AZ (Mg-Al-Zn) series magnesium alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, W.; Gong, C.; Jiang, P.; Gan, L.; Ren, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, J.; Qiu, W. Enhancing corrosion resistance of Mg-Alloys by regulating precipitates at grain boundaries using rare earth oxides. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 231, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a). TEM image, (b) EDS, and (c) XRD of multiwall CNT particles.
Figure 1. (a). TEM image, (b) EDS, and (c) XRD of multiwall CNT particles.
Metals 15 00673 g001
Figure 2. (a) Ultrasonication-assisted hybrid stir–squeeze (UHSS) casting machine and (b) IVIUM electrochemical workstation and related components.
Figure 2. (a) Ultrasonication-assisted hybrid stir–squeeze (UHSS) casting machine and (b) IVIUM electrochemical workstation and related components.
Metals 15 00673 g002
Figure 3. Optical microscope images of Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposites with varying weight percentages of MWCNT: (a) 0 wt.%, (b) 0.4 wt.%, (c) 0.8 wt.%, and (d) 1.2 wt.%.
Figure 3. Optical microscope images of Mg-Zn-Ce nanocomposites with varying weight percentages of MWCNT: (a) 0 wt.%, (b) 0.4 wt.%, (c) 0.8 wt.%, and (d) 1.2 wt.%.
Metals 15 00673 g003
Figure 4. XRD of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites.
Figure 4. XRD of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites.
Metals 15 00673 g004
Figure 5. TEM image of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites showing the presence of (a) individual MWCNT particle and MgZn2 phases in α-Mg matrix and (b) globular-structured Mg12Ce, needle shaped MgZn2, and dislocations array.
Figure 5. TEM image of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites showing the presence of (a) individual MWCNT particle and MgZn2 phases in α-Mg matrix and (b) globular-structured Mg12Ce, needle shaped MgZn2, and dislocations array.
Metals 15 00673 g005
Figure 6. (ad) Open circuit polarization plots of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites at different NaCl concentrations: (a) 0.4 M, (b) 0.6 M, (c) 0.8 M, and (d) 1 M, under exposure of 2400 s.
Figure 6. (ad) Open circuit polarization plots of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites at different NaCl concentrations: (a) 0.4 M, (b) 0.6 M, (c) 0.8 M, and (d) 1 M, under exposure of 2400 s.
Metals 15 00673 g006
Figure 7. Nyquist plots of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites with varying MWCNT content (0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, 1.2%) in NaCl solutions of (a) 0.4 M, (b) 0.6 M, (c) 0.8 M, and (d) 1 M concentrations. (e) Nyquist plot with fitted curve for 0.4 wt.% Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT in 0.6 M NaCl, showing the equivalent circuit with inductive behavior.
Figure 7. Nyquist plots of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites with varying MWCNT content (0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, 1.2%) in NaCl solutions of (a) 0.4 M, (b) 0.6 M, (c) 0.8 M, and (d) 1 M concentrations. (e) Nyquist plot with fitted curve for 0.4 wt.% Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT in 0.6 M NaCl, showing the equivalent circuit with inductive behavior.
Metals 15 00673 g007
Figure 8. Corrosion mechanism attributed to variation in MWCNT in Mg-Zn-Ce base.
Figure 8. Corrosion mechanism attributed to variation in MWCNT in Mg-Zn-Ce base.
Metals 15 00673 g008
Figure 9. High-frequency resistance plot of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites at different NaCl concentrations.
Figure 9. High-frequency resistance plot of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites at different NaCl concentrations.
Metals 15 00673 g009
Figure 10. Bode magnitude and phase angle plots of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites with varying MWCNT content (0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, 1.2%) in NaCl solutions of (a,b) 0.4 M, (c,d) 0.6 M, (e,f) 0.8 M, and (g,h) 1 M, showing impedance behavior across frequency.
Figure 10. Bode magnitude and phase angle plots of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites with varying MWCNT content (0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, 1.2%) in NaCl solutions of (a,b) 0.4 M, (c,d) 0.6 M, (e,f) 0.8 M, and (g,h) 1 M, showing impedance behavior across frequency.
Metals 15 00673 g010
Figure 11. Tafel plot of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites at different NaCl concentrations: (a) 0.4 M, (b) 0.6 M, (c) 0.8 M, and (d) 1 M.
Figure 11. Tafel plot of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites at different NaCl concentrations: (a) 0.4 M, (b) 0.6 M, (c) 0.8 M, and (d) 1 M.
Metals 15 00673 g011
Figure 12. SEM microstructures of (a) 0 wt.% MWCNT, (b) EDS of 0.8 wt.% MWCNT nanocomposites at 0.4 M NaCl concentration, (c,e) 0 wt.% MWCNT nanocomposites, and (d,f) 0.8 wt.% MWCNT nanocomposites at 0.4 M and 1 M NaCl concentration, respectively.
Figure 12. SEM microstructures of (a) 0 wt.% MWCNT, (b) EDS of 0.8 wt.% MWCNT nanocomposites at 0.4 M NaCl concentration, (c,e) 0 wt.% MWCNT nanocomposites, and (d,f) 0.8 wt.% MWCNT nanocomposites at 0.4 M and 1 M NaCl concentration, respectively.
Metals 15 00673 g012
Figure 13. Corrosion mechanism of Mg-Zn-Ce alloy and MWCNT-reinforced nanocomposites in NaCl electrolyte.
Figure 13. Corrosion mechanism of Mg-Zn-Ce alloy and MWCNT-reinforced nanocomposites in NaCl electrolyte.
Metals 15 00673 g013
Table 1. Chemical composition of Mg-Zn-Ce alloy characterized by atomic emission spectroscopy.
Table 1. Chemical composition of Mg-Zn-Ce alloy characterized by atomic emission spectroscopy.
ElementsMgZnCeREZrMnCuSiFeNi
wt.%93.934.30.60.60.530.02<0.005<0.0050.002<0.0005
Table 2. Composition and nomenclature of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites evaluated for electrochemical corrosion in varying NaCl concentrations (0.4 M, 0.6 M, 0.8 M, and 1 M).
Table 2. Composition and nomenclature of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites evaluated for electrochemical corrosion in varying NaCl concentrations (0.4 M, 0.6 M, 0.8 M, and 1 M).
S. No.CompositionNomenclature of Nanocomposites
1.Mg-Zn-Ce base alloy0%
2.Mg-Zn-Ce/0.4 wt.% MWCNT0.4%
3.Mg-Zn-Ce/0.8 wt.% MWCNT0.8%
4.Mg-Zn-Ce/1.2 wt.% MWCNT1.2%
Table 3. Ecorr, Icorr, and corrosion rate of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites in different NaCl concentrations.
Table 3. Ecorr, Icorr, and corrosion rate of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT nanocomposites in different NaCl concentrations.
CompositionNaCl ConcentrationEcorr (V)Icorr (µA/cm2)CR (mm/Year)Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency (%)
00.4 M−1.5328.80.43-
0.4−1.5027.40.3030
0.8−1.395.810.1077
1.2−1.4111.60.1858
00.6 M−1.6249.50.85-
0.4−1.5047.70.5140
0.8−1.4342.50.3658
1.2−1.4643.80.4745
00.8 M−1.641641.77-
0.4−1.521121.2032
0.8−1.4569.60.7557
1.2−1.4978.80.8552
01 M−1.713573.85-
0.4−1.542182.3539
0.8−1.491851.9948
1.2−1.512052.2143
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amith, S.C.; Lakshmanan, P.; Annamalai, G.; Gupta, M.; Thirugnanasambandam, A. Corrosion Resistance Behavior of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT Magnesium Nanocomposites Synthesized by Ultrasonication-Assisted Hybrid Stir–Squeeze Casting for Sacrificial Anode Applications. Metals 2025, 15, 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15060673

AMA Style

Amith SC, Lakshmanan P, Annamalai G, Gupta M, Thirugnanasambandam A. Corrosion Resistance Behavior of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT Magnesium Nanocomposites Synthesized by Ultrasonication-Assisted Hybrid Stir–Squeeze Casting for Sacrificial Anode Applications. Metals. 2025; 15(6):673. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15060673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amith, S. C., Poovazhagan Lakshmanan, Gnanavelbabu Annamalai, Manoj Gupta, and Arunkumar Thirugnanasambandam. 2025. "Corrosion Resistance Behavior of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT Magnesium Nanocomposites Synthesized by Ultrasonication-Assisted Hybrid Stir–Squeeze Casting for Sacrificial Anode Applications" Metals 15, no. 6: 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15060673

APA Style

Amith, S. C., Lakshmanan, P., Annamalai, G., Gupta, M., & Thirugnanasambandam, A. (2025). Corrosion Resistance Behavior of Mg-Zn-Ce/MWCNT Magnesium Nanocomposites Synthesized by Ultrasonication-Assisted Hybrid Stir–Squeeze Casting for Sacrificial Anode Applications. Metals, 15(6), 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15060673

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop