Next Article in Journal
Separation of REs from Ca and Mg Ions by Ammonium Bicarbonate Precipitation and the Influence of Fe and Al Ions
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Refining Temperature and Refining Time on Purification and Composition Control of FGH95 Powder Metallurgy Superalloy Return Material During Vacuum Induction Melting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Build Orientation and Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of SUS316L Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tensile Performance Sensitivity to Variations of Standard 17-4 PH Heat Treatments on LPBF-Produced Material

1
Materials Engineering, Department of Energy’s Kansas City National Security Campus, Kansas City, MO 64147, USA
2
Analytical Sciences, Department of Energy’s Kansas City National Security Campus, Kansas City, MO 64147, USA
3
Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65401, USA
4
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65401, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The Department of Energy’s Kansas City National Security Campus is operated and managed by Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC under contract number DE-NA0002839.
Metals 2025, 15(10), 1141; https://doi.org/10.3390/met15101141
Submission received: 13 September 2025 / Revised: 5 October 2025 / Accepted: 10 October 2025 / Published: 14 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Laser Processing of Metals and Alloys)

Abstract

Standard heat treatments for metals of a particular composition are typically designed with the assumption of a conventional starting microstructure, such as that produced by casting or wrought processing. When applied to metals fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) metal additive manufacturing (AM), these heat treatments can produce inconsistent performance due to the unique as-built microstructures. This study investigates how modifications to standard heat treatments for 17-4 PH steel influence the microstructure and mechanical properties of LPBF-fabricated material. Specimens were produced and subjected to varying solutionizing and homogenizing treatments followed by standard aging treatments. Microstructures were characterized using optical microscopy, Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD), and X-ray diffraction (XRD), and mechanical properties were evaluated through uniaxial tensile testing. Based on these results, recommendations are provided for achieving improved wrought-like performance in LPBF 17-4 PH steel.
Keywords: additive manufacturing; laser powder bed fusion; 17-4 PH; heat treatment additive manufacturing; laser powder bed fusion; 17-4 PH; heat treatment
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brown, B.; Read, C.; Newkirk, J.; Liou, F. Tensile Performance Sensitivity to Variations of Standard 17-4 PH Heat Treatments on LPBF-Produced Material. Metals 2025, 15, 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15101141

AMA Style

Brown B, Read C, Newkirk J, Liou F. Tensile Performance Sensitivity to Variations of Standard 17-4 PH Heat Treatments on LPBF-Produced Material. Metals. 2025; 15(10):1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15101141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brown, Ben, Cory Read, Joseph Newkirk, and Frank Liou. 2025. "Tensile Performance Sensitivity to Variations of Standard 17-4 PH Heat Treatments on LPBF-Produced Material" Metals 15, no. 10: 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15101141

APA Style

Brown, B., Read, C., Newkirk, J., & Liou, F. (2025). Tensile Performance Sensitivity to Variations of Standard 17-4 PH Heat Treatments on LPBF-Produced Material. Metals, 15(10), 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15101141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop