Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Strength and Electrical Conductivity in Graphite-Cement Mortars with Carbonized Titanium-Bearing Blast Furnace Slag as an Aggregate
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Secondary Phases on Multi-Step Phase Transitions and Magnetocaloric Properties in MnFe-Based Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Nb, Ta and Zr on the Interdiffusion Coefficients and Solid Solution Strengthening of γ-TiAl Single Phase Alloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physical and Magnetic Properties of ThMn12-Type Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 Melt-Spun Ribbons

Powder Materials Division, Korea Institute of Materials Science, Changwon 51508, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(5), 753; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12050753
Submission received: 8 March 2022 / Revised: 18 April 2022 / Accepted: 20 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phase Transition and Magnetic Effect of Magnetic Alloy)

Abstract

:
The magnetic properties of ThMn12-type Fe-rich compounds were investigated by producing Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons. The produced ribbons, with different conditions by varying the melt-spinning conditions, were characterized to investigate physical and magnetic properties. Weight fraction of ThMn12-type phase decreased from 94.5 to 57.1 wt. % as the melt-spinning wheel speed increased from 6.5 to 39 m/s, and corresponding magnetizations and coercivities were substantially varied; the coercivity increased up to 0.175 T from 0.058 T by increasing the wheel speed from 6.5 to 26 m/s, and their magnetization also increased from 89.81 Am2/kg to 105.58 Am2/kg, even though the content of ThMn12-type phase decreased. Morphologies of the ribbons were also observed to verify the melt-spinning effects on the surface conditions and grain sizes. It was found that the particle and grain sizes in the ribbons became smaller and striped patterns appeared as the wheel speed increased. The grain size decreased from about 1 μm to 250 nm by increasing the wheel speed from 6.5 to 39 m/s.

1. Introduction

Rare-earth intermetallic compounds of R(Fe,M)12 (R = rare earth elements, M = transition metals) with ThMn12 structure have been known to be promising permanent magnetic materials since the 1980s [1]. Recently, increasing demand for raw rare earths motivated intensifying research on rare-earth-lean and rare-earth-free hard magnetic materials, which could “bridge” the performance gap between ferrite and Nd-Fe-B magnets [2]. R(Fe,M)12 compounds with ThMn12 structure show enough possibility to fill the gap as rare-earth-lean hard magnetic materials. In particular, Sm(Fe,M)12 compounds show excellent intrinsic hard magnetic properties with saturation magnetization (Ms) of 1.78 T, anisotropy field (Ha) of 12 T, and Curie temperature (Tc) of 859 K, all of which are even higher than Nd–Fe–B compounds [3]. Besides the excellent magnetic properties, the lower cost of Sm than Nd in the Nd–Fe–B compounds also leads the Sm(Fe,M)12 compounds to be superior to the most permanent magnets, including rare-earth permanent but also rare-earth-free magnets.
The crystal structure of ThMn12 is originated from an unstable CaCu5 structure with a 1:5 ratio of rare-earth elements (R) to 3d transition elements (T). By substituting more R and T elements into the CaCu5 structure, the ThMn12 structure is obtained. When the substituted R atoms are randomly positioned, the TbCu7 structure is easily obtained with an R:T ratio ranging from 1:5 to 1:9 [4]. The ThMn12 phase, however, is also unstable, and Fe atoms must be partially substituted with phase-stabilizing element(s), such as Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Mo, W, Al, and Si, which results in magnetization reduction [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The large transition metals, such as Ti, V, Mo, Ta, and W, occupy the 8i sites of R(Fe,M)12, while the sp atoms, such as Al and Si, prefer the 8f sites [1,14,15]. The largest number of research papers focus on Ti substitution as a phase-stabilizing element, since a small amount of Ti can effectively stabilize the ThMn12-type phase, while higher concentrations of other elements, such as V, Cr, Mn, Mo, Al, and Si, are needed to stabilize the phase. Nevertheless, a number of research working on substituting such elements have also been performed in order to enhance magnetic properties including coercivity (Hc). Among the above elements, Si is one of the cheapest elements that can possibly enhance the Hc by increasing single domain size or segregating at the grain boundary phase.
However, the Si substituted R(Fe,M)12 compounds have not been widely investigated, even though preceding research verifies that R(Fe,Si)12 compounds could exhibit outstanding magnetic properties [16,17]. Due to the high formation temperature of the ThMn12 structure, it is a challenging task to successfully obtain nano-sized grains for a high Hc [18]. Previously, Qian et al. substituted both Ti and Si in R(Fe,M)12 to obtain ThMn12-type phase with a higher stability than Ti-only substituted structure, but it was found that the Ti and Si substituted R(Fe,Si)12 exhibits degraded Hc [19]. Finding a way to stabilize the nanostructure during the solidification and high-temperature treatment is essential to develop Si-substituted R(Fe,M)12 compounds.
In order to extend the study of melt-spun ternary alloys R(Fe,Si), we report, in this paper, our results concerning the influences of melt-spinning conditions on weight fractions of crystallized phases and their lattice parameters, magnetic properties, and morphologies. The wheel speeds during the melt-spinning processes decisively affect the ribbon conditions. The phase stabilities of the melt-spun ribbons is also discussed to clarify the effect of Si substitution in R(Fe,M)12 compounds.

2. Experiment

Ingots with nominal compositions, Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2, were prepared by arc-melting high-purity Sm (99.9%), Fe (99.95%), Co (99.95%), and Si (99.9%) pieces under an Ar atmosphere. An excess of Sm of 30 at. % was included in the alloys to compensate for the Sm evaporation loss and obtain a high-purity ThMn12-type phase. The ingots were melted in an Ar environment in quartz nozzles and ejected through a 0.4 mm orifice using pressurized Ar gas onto a copper wheel rotating at a velocity of 6.5–39 m/s.
The crystalline structure and phase purities of the products were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu–Kα (λ = 1.5406 Å) radiation; the measured XRD patterns were analyzed using the Rietveld refinement method with the FullProf program (version 7.20). The morphologies of the ribbons were examined using a Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JSM-7001F, JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The high-resolution morphologies of the bulks were observed using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM, JEM 2100F, JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). The TEM specimens were prepared using a focused ion beam. Magnetic properties of the ribbon and bulk samples were measured using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, MicroSense LLC, Lowell, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The XRD patterns of manually ground Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with different wheel speeds are shown in Figure 1. Phase identities and their weight fractions were analyzed using the Rietveld refinement method with the FullProf program. The four ground ribbons were mainly found to be mixtures of a tetragonal structure with a space group of I4/mmm and a hexagonal structure with a space group of P6/mmm, which indicate ThMn12-type and TbCu7-type phases, respectively. A small amount, less than 1 wt. %, of α-Fe phase was observed in the ribbons with the wheel speed of 6.5 m/s. The weight fraction of the ThMn12-type phase decreased from 94.5 to 57.1 wt. % with the increasing wheel speed, while the TbCu7-type phase simultaneously increased from 4.7 to 42.9 wt. % as listed in Table 1. Due to the high quenching rate by the melt spinning, an amorphous phase could be formed in the ribbons, where its fraction certainly increases with the increasing quenching rate [20]. It is noted that the fraction of the amorphous phase is not included in Table 1. The decreasing peak intensities and their broadening widths in Figure 1, with the increasing wheel speed, correspond to the decreasing grain sizes of the crystallized ThMn12-type and TbCu7-type phases. Lattice parameters a and c of ThMn12-type and TbCu7-type phases in the samples with different wheel speeds are also listed in Table 1. The increase in wheel speed from 6.5 to 39 m/s led to the change in lattice parameters. The parameters a and c of ThMn12-type and TbCu7-type change irregularly when the wheel speed increase from 6.5 to 39 m/s. However, for the 26 m/s melt-spun ribbons, the c/a of ThMn12-type gets the highest point of 0.5571 while the c/a of TbCu7-type gets the lowest point of 0.8546. The calculated average atomic volumes of ThMn12-type and TbCu7-type increased linearly due to increased cell volumes when the solidification rate increased.
The magnetic properties of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with different quenching rates by different wheel speeds were also investigated, as shown in Figure 2. Magnetic hysteresis loops of the four samples were measured at room temperature with a maximum magnetic field of 2.5 T. The detailed magnetic properties, including magnetization at 2.5 T (M2.5T), remanent magnetization (Mr), Hc, and Tc, are listed in Table 2. The increasing wheel speed resulted in decreasing grain size, as can be seen in Figure 1, which resulted in the enhanced Hc from 0.058 to 0.175 T until the speed reached 26 m/s, even though the weight fraction of the ThMn12-type phase decreased from 94.5 to 70.2 wt. %, as listed in Table 1. Tomoko Kuno et al. also reported that a mixture phase of 1:9 and 1:12 could have higher Hc than pure 1:9 or 1:12 [21]. On the other hand, the Hc decreased to 0.137 T due to the low weight fraction of ThMn12-type phase of 57.1 wt. %, high content of TbCu7-type of 42.9 wt. %, and the existence of the amorphous phase according to the increased broadness of the observed XRD peak. The M2.5 T of the ribbon with the highest weight fraction of the ThMn12-type phase was 89.81 Am2/kg, which increased with the increasing wheel speed to 111.09 and 105.58 Am2/kg for the wheel speeds of 13 and 26 m/s, respectively. Like the Hc, the M2.5 T also dramatically decreased to 70.29 Am2/kg when the wheel speed was 39 m/s due to the low weight fraction of the ThMn12-type phase. The corresponding Mr were also enhanced from 29.63 to 56.09 Am2/kg due to the increased M2.5T and Hc up to the wheel speed of 26 m/s and then decreased to 29.63 Am2/kg at the higher wheel speed. It is noted that the deterioration of magnetization and Hc were also attributed to the highly possible existence of the amorphous phase in the ribbons.
Normalized temperature dependences of magnetizations from 300 to 1000 K under an applied field of 0.02 T for the four ribbon samples were measured, as shown in Figure 3a. The Tc were obtained by differentiating the curves in Figure 3a and finding maximum curvatures points, as shown in Figure 3b. The obtained Tc are listed in Table 2. All of the dM/dT curves in Figure 3b show two peaks, i.e., Tc1 and Tc2, which means that two magnetic phases coexist in the ribbons according to the results presented by Saito et al. on the microstructure of TbCu7 and ThMn12 melt-spun ribbons [22], first at a lower temperature, after which the ThMn12 is crystallized at a higher temperature during the heat treatment process. Furthermore, the Tc of the TbCu7 is also lower than the ThMn12. Therefore, we could identify Tc1 as belonging to the TbCu7-type phase and Tc2 as belonging to the ThMn12. The varying Tc1 and Tc2 in Figure 3b are attributed to the existing crystalline phases, such as the TbCu7 and ThMn12. The Tc1 increased from 653 to 694 K according to the increasing wheel speed from 6.5 to 13 m/s. The Tc2 decreased from 733 to 718 K when the wheel speed increased from 6.5 to 39 m/s. It is noted that the Tc for all the samples are significantly higher than the Tc of 590 K for the Nd2Fe14B magnet [23,24]. In conclusion, the sample consisted of 70.2 wt. % of ThMn12-type phase and 29.8 wt. % of TbCu7-type phase, which was melt spun at the wheel speed of 26 m/s, exhibiting the highest Mr and Hc among the fabricated samples.
Microstructures of the melt-spun ribbons with different wheel speeds were observed. SEM and back-scattered electrons (BSE) images of the four samples in Figure 4 show clear differences in the microstructure. The sample melt spun at the wheel speed of 6.5 m/s consists of random-shaped particles (marked in red circles) of 20–35 μm in diameter, as shown in Figure 4a,e. The particles in the sample with the wheel speed of 13 m/s in Figure 4b,f are unclearly shaped but are certainly aligned based on the striped patterns on the surface. During the melt-spinning process, the solidification occurs along the rolling wheel direction due to its high-speed wheel, which directly contacts the ejected molten ingots. Therefore, the striped patterns and particles become conspicuous and elongated with the increasing wheel speed. The particle size of the sample melt spun at the wheel speed of 26 m/s range from 4.5 to10 μm, and overall strips are along the wheel direction as shown in Figure 4c,g. The strips and particle size for the sample melt spun at the wheel speed of 39 m/s are more obviously elongated, as shown in Figure 4d,h. The particle size of the columnar-like particles in Figure 4d,h are 4–9 μm in the longitudinal direction and 2–3 μm in the transverse direction.
Magnetic properties, especially Hc, are strongly related to grain sizes of magnetic materials. Grain boundaries and impurities act as pinning centers for the domain walls by strongly inhibiting their motion, and thus reducing the efficiency of this reversal mechanism. However, if the grain size itself is not close to the single domain size, the grain boundaries and pinning centers cannot effectively play a role to increase the Hc. In order to increase the Hc, it is worth decreasing grain size to near the single domain size. Figure 5a is a high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) image of the sample with the wheel speed of 6.5 m/s. The indicated grains with red and blue colors were analyzed to be ThMn12-type and TbCu7-type phases, respectively, using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Figure 5b–e are high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of the samples with the wheel speeds of 6.5, 13, 26, and 39 m/s, respectively. According to the figures, the average grain size significantly decreased from about 1 μm to 250 nm, and the grain boundaries become unclear due to the increasing content of the amorphous phase by increasing the wheel speed from 6.5 to 39 m/s.

4. Conclusions

We successfully fabricated Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with hard magnetic ThMn12-type and TbCu7-type phases. It was found that the increasing wheel speed results in the decreasing content of ThMn12-type phase, while it increases the TbCu7-type phase. The highest coercivity among the samples with different wheel speeds appeared not in the case that the weight fraction of ThMn12-type is the highest but in the case that the weight fraction of ThMn12-type phase is 70.2% and that of TbCu7-type is 29.8%. Grain size of the ribbons decreased with the increasing wheel speed, therefore decreasing the grain size from about 1 μm to 250 nm. A precise control of phase transformation and prevention of grain growth in the Si-substituted Fe-rich compounds are key technologies to further enhance magnetic properties in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-D.Q. and J.P.; methodology, H.-D.Q.; software, J.T.L.; validation, H.-D.Q., J.-W.K. and Y.Y.; formal analysis, H.-D.Q.; investigation, H.-D.Q.; resources, C.-J.C.; data curation, Y.Y., T.H.Z. and H.K.J.; writ-ing—original draft preparation, H.-D.Q.; writing—review and editing, J.P.; visualization, J.P.; su-pervision, C.-J.C.; project administration, C.-J.C.; funding acquisition, C.-J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Future Materials Discovery Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2016M3D1A1027835), and by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE) (20192010106850, Development of magnetic materials for IE4 class motor).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hadjipanayis, G.C.; Gabay, A.M.; Schönhöbel, A.M.; Martín-Cid, A.; Barandiaran, J.M.; Niarchos, D. ThMn12-type alloys for permanent magnets. Engineering 2020, 6, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gabay, A.M.; Hadjippanayis, G.C. ThMn12-type structure and uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in ZrFe10Si2 and Zr1−xCexFe10Si2 alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 657, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hirayama, Y.; Takahashi, Y.K.; Hirosawa, S.; Hono, K. Intrinsic hard magnetic properties of Sm(Fe1−xCox)12 compound with the ThMn12 structure. Scr. Mater. 2017, 138, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Takahashi, Y.K.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Ohkubo, T. Recent advances in SmFe12-based permanent magnets. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2021, 22, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ogawa, D.; Xu, X.D.; Takahashi, Y.K.; Ohkubo, T.; Hirosawa, S.; Hono, K. Emergence of coercivity in Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)12 thin films via eutectic alloy grain boundary infiltration. Scr. Mater. 2019, 164, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fuji, H.; Sun, H. Interstitially modified intermetallics of rare earth and 3D elements. In Handbook of Magnetic Materials; Springer Science+Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 1995; Volume 9, pp. 303–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tozman, P.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Takahashi, Y.K.; Hirosawa, S.; Hono, K. Intrinsic magnetic properties of Sm(Fe1−xCox)11Ti and Zr-substituted Sm1−yZr(Fe0.8Co0.2)11.5Ti0.5 compounds with ThMn12 structure toward the development of permanent magnets. Acta Mater. 2018, 153, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tozman, P.; Sepehri-Amin, H.; Zhang, L.T.; Wang, J.; Xu, X.D.; Hono, K. An alternative approach to the measurement of anisotropy field—Single grain extraction. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 494, 165747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuno, T.; Suzuki, S.; Urushibata, K.; Kobayashi, K.; Sakuma, N.; Yano, M.; Kato, A.; Manabe, A. (Sm,Zr)(Fe,Co)11.0-11.5Ti1.0-0.5 compounds as new permanent magnet materials. AIP Adv. 2016, 6, 025221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Coehoorn, R. Electronic structure and magnetism of transition-metal-stabilized YFe12−xMx intermetallic compounds. Phys. Rev. B. 1990, 41, 11790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, H.S.; Coey, J.M.D. Magnetic properties of ternary rare-earth transition-metal compounds handbook of magnetic materials. In Handbook of Magnetic Materials; Springer Science+Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 1991; Volume 6, pp. 1–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fukazawa, T.; Akai, H.; Hirayama, Y.; Miyake, T. First-principles study of intersite magnetic couplings and curie temperature in RFe12−xCrx (R=Y. Nd, Sm). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2018, 87, 044706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chen, N.X.; Hao, S.Q.; Wu, Y.; Shen, J. Phase stability and a site preference of Sm(Fe, T)12. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2001, 233, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Buschow, K.H.J. Permanent magnet materials based on tetragonal rare earth compounds of the type RFe12−xMx. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1991, 100, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bacmann, M.; Baudelet, C.; Fruchart, D.; Gignoux, D.; Hlil, E.K.; Krill, G. Exchange interactions and magneto-crystalline anisotropy in RFe12-xMx and parent interstitial compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2004, 383, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gabay, A.M.; Schegoleva, N.N.; Belozerov, E.V. The structure and hard magnetic properties of rapid quenched (Sm,Zr)1(Fe,Si)12 alloys. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2002, 94, 252–257. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding, J.; Rosenberg, M. Magnetic properties of melt spun and crystallized SmFe10M2. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1990, 83, 257–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gabay, A.M.; Hadjippanayis, G.C. Mechanochemical synthesis of magnetically hard anisotropic RFe10Si2 powders with R representing combinations of Sm, Ce, and Zr. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 422, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Qian, H.D.; Lim, J.T.; Kim, J.W.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, T.H.; An, S.Y.; Jeon, H.K.; Cho, K.M.; Park, J.H.; Choi, C.J. Crystallization and magnetic properties of ThMn12-type Sm-Fe-Co-Ti-Si based magnetic materials. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 16, 1458–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qian, H.D.; Lim, J.T.; Kim, J.W.; Yang, Y.; Cho, K.M.; Park, J.H.; Choi, C.J. Phase transformation and magnetic properties of fully dense Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)11Ti bulk magnets. Scr. Mater. 2021, 193, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kuno, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Urushibata, K.; Kobayashi, K.; Sugimoto, S. Preparation of High-Coercivity Magnetic Powder via Heat Treatment of a Rapidly Quenched Amorphous Starting Compound with a ThMn12 Structure. Mater. Trans. 2020, 61, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saito, T.; Miyoshi, H.; Nishio-Hamane, D. Magnetic properties of Sm–Fe–Ti nanocomposite magnets with a ThMn12 structure. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 519, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Grössinger, R.; Krewenka, R.; Sun, X.K.; Eibler, R.; Kirchmayr, H.R.; Buschow, K.H.J. Magnetic phase transitions and magnetic anisotropy in Nd2Fe14−xCoxB compounds. J. Less Comm. Met. 1986, 124, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hirosawa, S.; Matsuura, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Fujiura, S.; Sagawa, M.; Yamauchi, H. Magnetization and magnetic anisotropy of R2Fe14B measured on single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 59, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Refined X-ray diffraction patterns of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 melt-spun ribbons with different wheel speeds.
Figure 1. Refined X-ray diffraction patterns of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 melt-spun ribbons with different wheel speeds.
Metals 12 00753 g001
Figure 2. Magnetic hysteresis loops of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with different wheel speeds.
Figure 2. Magnetic hysteresis loops of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with different wheel speeds.
Metals 12 00753 g002
Figure 3. Temperature dependences of (a) normalized magnetizations and (b) temperature derivative of magnetization (dM/dT) curves of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with different wheel speeds under an applied magnetic field of 0.02 T.
Figure 3. Temperature dependences of (a) normalized magnetizations and (b) temperature derivative of magnetization (dM/dT) curves of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with different wheel speeds under an applied magnetic field of 0.02 T.
Metals 12 00753 g003
Figure 4. SEM and BSE images of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with the wheel speeds of (a,e) 6.5, (b,f) 13, (c,g) 26, and (d,h) 39 m/s, respectively.
Figure 4. SEM and BSE images of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with the wheel speeds of (a,e) 6.5, (b,f) 13, (c,g) 26, and (d,h) 39 m/s, respectively.
Metals 12 00753 g004
Figure 5. (a) HAADF image of the sample with the wheel speed of 6.5 m/s and HRTEM images of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with the wheel speeds of (b) 6.5, (c) 13, (d) 26 m/s, and (e) 39 m/s.
Figure 5. (a) HAADF image of the sample with the wheel speed of 6.5 m/s and HRTEM images of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with the wheel speeds of (b) 6.5, (c) 13, (d) 26 m/s, and (e) 39 m/s.
Metals 12 00753 g005
Table 1. Lattice parameters a and c, c/a, and average atomic volumes (V, Å3) of ThMn12-type and TbCu7-type phases and weight fraction (wt. %) of ThMn12, TbCu7, and α-Fe phases in the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 melt-spun ribbons with different wheel speeds. The values of lattice parameters have a confidence interval of ±0.005 according to the deviation from measurement and refinement.
Table 1. Lattice parameters a and c, c/a, and average atomic volumes (V, Å3) of ThMn12-type and TbCu7-type phases and weight fraction (wt. %) of ThMn12, TbCu7, and α-Fe phases in the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 melt-spun ribbons with different wheel speeds. The values of lattice parameters have a confidence interval of ±0.005 according to the deviation from measurement and refinement.
Wheel Speed
(m/s)
ThMn12TbCu7ThMn12
(wt. %)
TbCu7
(wt. %)
α-Fe
(wt. %)
a (Å)c (Å)c/aV(Å3)a (Å)c (Å)c/aV(Å3)
6.58.4324.7480.563112.984.8544.1830.861836.5494.54.70.8
138.3784.8200.575313.014.8474.1480.855836.6284.514.70.8
268.3844.8380.577113.084.8634.1560.854636.8170.229.80
398.4244.8040.570313.114.8504.2120.868536.9057.142.90
Table 2. Magnetization at 2.5 T (M2.5T), remanent magnetization (Mr), coercivity (Hc), and Curie temperature (Tc) of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with different wheel speeds.
Table 2. Magnetization at 2.5 T (M2.5T), remanent magnetization (Mr), coercivity (Hc), and Curie temperature (Tc) of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 ribbons with different wheel speeds.
Wheel Speed (m/s)M2.5T (Am2/kg)Mr (Am2/kg)Hc (T)Tc1 (K)Tc2 (K)
6.589.8129.630.058653733
13111.0951.200.118694726
26105.5856.090.175684719
3970.2929.630.137689718
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qian, H.-D.; Lim, J.T.; Kim, J.-W.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, T.H.; Jeon, H.K.; Park, J.; Choi, C.-J. Physical and Magnetic Properties of ThMn12-Type Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 Melt-Spun Ribbons. Metals 2022, 12, 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12050753

AMA Style

Qian H-D, Lim JT, Kim J-W, Yang Y, Zhou TH, Jeon HK, Park J, Choi C-J. Physical and Magnetic Properties of ThMn12-Type Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 Melt-Spun Ribbons. Metals. 2022; 12(5):753. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12050753

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qian, Hui-Dong, Jung Tae Lim, Jong-Woo Kim, Yang Yang, Tian Hong Zhou, Han Kook Jeon, Jihoon Park, and Chul-Jin Choi. 2022. "Physical and Magnetic Properties of ThMn12-Type Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)10Si2 Melt-Spun Ribbons" Metals 12, no. 5: 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12050753

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop