Next Article in Journal
Effect of Iron Ore Pellet Size on Metallurgical Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Modern Trends in Foundry
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Plasticity and Corrosion Resistance in Mg-Zn-Ca-Cu Amorphous Alloy Composite via Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Technological and Quality Aspects of the Use of Innovative Inorganic Binders in the Production of Castings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Bismuth on Technological and Material Characteristics of Low-Alloyed Automotive Steels with a Good Machinability

MATERIAL AND METALLURGICAL RESEARCH Ltd., Pohraniční 693/31, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(2), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12020301
Submission received: 20 December 2021 / Revised: 26 January 2022 / Accepted: 5 February 2022 / Published: 9 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modern Trends in Foundry)

Abstract

:
The aim of this work is to compare the technological and material properties of CMnCr steels without bismuth, with 0.08 wt. % Bi and 0.12 wt. % Bi. Experimental heats showed that the most advantageous alloying of Bi into the heat was in the ladle, with an efficiency of about 20%. The optimal temperature range for forming steel was found to be 1160–1050 °C. With increasing Bi content, the formability of steels and plastic properties decreased, while the yield stress and tensile strength increased. Manganese sulfides, aluminum oxides, or oxysulfides, which were segregated both individually and in clusters, were found in the matrix of all tested steels. In steels with Bi, the Bi particles segregate the separately in the form of globules, either as envelopes of elongated MnS or Al2O3 particles segregated in rows. Sulfur dot-shaped segregations in the steel with 0.12 wt. % of Bi and the steel without Bi were essentially uniform over the whole area. For the steel with 0.08 wt. % of Bi, both dot-like and ray-ordered sulfur segregations were observed. The microstructure of all tested steels was ferritic–pearlitic with islands of bainite. Towards the center of the forged bars, variable shape and size of bainite blocks were observed. Machinability tests evaluated by the extend of tool wear showed that the most advantageous was CMnCr steel alloyed with 0.08 wt. % Bi.

1. Introduction

Free cutting steels belong to the group of special steels. The properties of free cutting steels are specifically designed for the easy machining of products, which is one of the key technological requirements, especially in the automotive industry. Machining costs represent approximately 50% of the value of the machined part. Other properties, such as response to heat treatment, mechanical resistance, fatigue characteristics, corrosion resistance, brittle fracture properties, etc., are secondary aspects of these steels, although in many cases they can be a determining parameter for the selection of steel grade [1].
From an industrial point of view, a free cutting steel is one that contains more sulfur than carbon. Thanks to the higher content of sulfur or phosphorus, these steels are easy to machine. Alloying with sulfur and lead is used in the development and optimization of the properties of free cutting steels, but also the addition of other elements like phosphorus, lead, selenium, tellurium, antimony, calcium, bismuth, or tin [2].
Free cutting steels produce small, dud, easily breaking, brittle chips during machining, which increases the machinability of the material by reducing the length of contact between the workpiece and cutting tool, thus reducing friction, the heating of the tool and workpiece, and tool wear, while increasing performance. According to [3], free cutting steels can be divided into four main types. These are steels with an increased content of sulfur, phosphorus and sulfur, lead, or super (alloyed with selenium, tellurium and bismuth). From the machinability point of view, the key criteria are cutting force, smoothness of the machined surface, chip shape, tool life, and possibly also the coefficient of friction and cutting temperature [4,5,6,7].
In addition to optimizing the machining process itself, higher machinability can also be achieved in the steel stage of steel production, namely:
  • By adding non-metallic and metallic soluble elements, e.g., Mn, S, Se.
  • By adding metallic and non-metallic insoluble elements such as Pb, Bi, Te.
  • By reducing the amount of hard particles that lead to a reduction in the abrasiveness of the steel during machining; something which, however, requires the optimization of steel production technology.
It is generally believed that the metallurgical processing of steels can improve their machinability due to LME (Liquid Metal Embrittlement), reducing BUE (Built-Up Edge—plastically deformed particles of the material being machined) on the blade, and forming a reinforced layer on the machined surface [8].
Sulfur together with manganese forms MnS inclusions in free cutting steels [9]. It is generally stated that MnS inclusions result in chip breaking discontinuities in the microstructure. MnS inclusions form a large amount of soft particles that are available for the formation of microscopic crack nuclei, which increases machinability [10], while inclusions formed by hard and abrasive oxides have a negative effect where machining is concerned [11]. MnS also acts as a lubricant at the tool–chip interface, and at the same time creates a protective coating for the tool. The result of this process is a reduction in cutting force and temperature and a significant reduction in tool wear. The wear rate of the tool decreases with increased volume fraction of MnS inclusions [8,12]. Kato et al. [13] have experimentally shown that the morphology and distribution of MnS inclusions have an effect on machinability, on cold wear, and on contact fatigue. In terms of the better machinability of the material, the presence of a smaller number of large inclusions in the matrix is more advantageous than a large number of small inclusions [14]. Several innovative methods for managing and controlling the morphology of MnS inclusions have been patented [5,15,16].
Lead, which is added to some free cutting steels, acts here as an internal lubricant. To improve machinability, contents in the range of 0.15–0.35 wt. % have generally been reported [1,16,17]. Alloying molten steel with lead is nevertheless difficult because lead has a low melting point and a boiling point of about 1700 °C or 1500 °C in the form of oxide. Lead is a heavy metal with a higher density than steel, which means that during conventional steelmaking processes, lead settles to the bottom of the melting bath or it evaporates and releases toxic fumes. Due to the almost zero solubility of lead in steel at room temperature, lead in steel forms inclusions, either alone or in junction with MnS [6].
At present, however, manufacturers are forced to develop lead-free free cutting steels. This is due to the tightening of standards that limit the amount of lead and other heavy metals in water, food, and the environment. Most heavy metals, including lead, are harmful in very small quantities. Health risks, as well as growing environmental pressures to remove lead and its alloys from the environment, have led to efforts to find lead-free alternatives for free cutting steel. One possibility is the development of free cutting steels with bismuth, which has a similar effect as lead on machinability [18].
Bismuth alloying generally leads to a grain refinement, reducing the proportion of carbide phase and also homogenizing the steel structure. Due to grain refinement, the yield strength and tensile strength increase with increasing Bi content. In steels, Bi precipitates either alone in globular form, or in the form of oxides and sulfides. Bismuth, similar to sulfur, segregates at grain boundaries and reduces their cohesive strength, and therefore also has a negative effect on formability [19].
In the solid state, bismuth is insoluble in steel and is present in the form of microscopic particles with a low melting point of only 271 °C, which significantly impairs the mechanical and corrosion properties of steel. Since the boiling point of bismuth (1560 °C) [20] is very close to the casting temperature of steel, there is a problem with its volatility and evaporation during casting. It has a lower density than lead, and therefore its tendency to segregate is lower. The positive effect of bismuth on machinability can be achieved when its content is approximately three times lower than that of lead. Bismuth is, however, about nine times more expensive than lead, and the very low number of its suppliers can be a problem. In general, the effect of bismuth on machinability includes:
  • The formation of a lubricating film due to the low melting point of bismuth;
  • Its functioning as a diffusion barrier;
  • Deposits on MnS particles and a reduction in their ductility;
  • Stress concentration and the formation of cavities and microcracks; and
  • Embrittlement of steel and cracking in the temperature range of 300–400 °C.
Liu et al. [21,22] analyzed the effect of bismuth on the shape of inclusions and the formability of free cutting steels. Mostly three types of inclusions have been found, namely isolated MnS inclusions, isolated Bi inclusions, and MnS inclusions surrounded by a Bi envelope (MnS + Bi). The higher the content of bismuth in steel, the worse its formability in the temperature range of 850–1100 °C. This is due to the segregation of bismuth at the grain boundaries in liquid form and in the form of low-melting particles, as well as to the presence of a ferritic film and non-recrystallized austenite at the grain boundaries. To eliminate the harmful effect of Bi on the hot ductility of steel, a low deformation rate during the hot forming of free cutting steels with bismuth is recommended [23,24].
Hu et al. [14] studied the effect of different contents of bismuth (0.021 wt. %, 0.054 wt. %, 0.071 wt. %) on the microcleanliness of SAE 1215 free cutting steel. As the content of Bi increases, the size of sulfides decreases, and at the same time, a change in their morphology was observed, from longitudinal to oval or spherical inclusions of sulfide.
It is generally believed that bismuth is definitely one of the elements that have great potential to replace lead in free cutting steels [25,26,27].
The aim of the paper is to present the effect of bismuth on the technological and material characteristics of low-alloyed automotive steels with good machinability.
The research and development in this field of expertise was motivated by the effort to increase the competitiveness of industry partners in the market with high quality automotive steels.

2. Materials and Methods

Experiments were realized in three trial heats of low-alloy CMnCr steels, which were alloyed with bismuth in the form of a filled profile with a composition of 93 wt. % Bi and 7 wt. % CaCO3. Heats were gradually produced in the atmospheric induction furnace (AIF) made by INDUCTOTHERM EUROPE LTD, Worcestershire, England. The first heat was not alloyed with bismuth, the final bismuth content for the second and third heat was targeted at 0.08 wt. % and 0.12 wt. %. Verification of the effect of bismuth on the technological and material characteristics of steels was performed on the ingots and forged bars.
Six circular ingots (two from each trial heat), each weighing 150 kg, were bottom poured. Ingots had a diameter of 180 mm and a length of 700 mm.
To assess the hot deformation behavior of the steels, physical simulations of metal forming were performed using a universal torsion plastometer (Setaram, Caluire-et-Cuire, France). Specimens with a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 200 mm sampled from experimental ingots were used. The tests were carried out in the temperature range 850–1200 °C, in 50 °C steps. Four different strain rates were used, namely 0.02 s−1, 0.09 s−1, 0.42 s−1, 1.94 s−1. Formability was expressed by fracture strain intensity S e f according to Equitation (1).
S e f = 2 3 a r g s i n h 2 · π · R N 3 L
where N is number of specimen revs to fracture [-], R radius of the specimen [mm], L is initial gauge length of specimen [mm].
Based on the formability test results, ingots were forged with a hydraulic press into billets with a square cross section with a side length of 80 mm, and then the billets were heated and forged with a power hammer into bars with a diameter of 58 mm. After forging, the bars were cooled in air and subsequently were rough-machined into bars with a diameter of 50 mm.
Chemical composition of samples was verified by optical emission spectrometry on a stationary SPECTROMAX analyzer (SPECTRO Analytical Instruments, GmbH, Kleve, Germany); carbon and sulfur were determined by combustion method on a stationary element analyzer Eltra CS2000 (ELTRA, GmbH, Haan, Germany).
Baumann prints for macrostructural evaluation was performed in accordance with ISO 4968 by sulphuric acid solution. The initial semi-finished products were rough-machined bars with a 50 mm of diameter. The content of nonmetallic inclusions was determined according to SEP 1572 at 100× magnification. Structural analyses were performed after etching samples in a solution of 4% HNO3 in ethyl alcohol. GX51 light microscope (OLYMPUS, Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used for microscopic observations. Electron microscopy analyses were performed using a JSM5510 scanning electron microscope (JEOL Co., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an X-max 20 energy dispersion spectrum analyzer (Oxford Instruments, Inc., Abingdon, UK).
The mechanical properties of the bars were verified by a tensile test using a 100 kN universal testing machine (walter + bai ag, Löhningen, Switzerland), by Charpy-V impact test on a Charpy PH300 (walter + bai ag, Löhningen, Switzerland) and by Brinell Hardness test HBW 187.5/2.5 using an Emco M1C 010 hardness tester (EMCOTEST, GmbH, Kuchel, Austria). The test specimens for the tensile test had a diameter of 10 mm and an initial gauge length of 50 mm. Standard test specimens with a V-notch with a depth of 2 mm were used for the Charpy impact test. Hardness was measured on the ends of Charpy specimens. All tests were always performed at ambient temperature.
The machinability was evaluated on the UT-300L CNC lathe machine (ACCUWAY MACHINERY Co., Ltd., Shengang, Taiwan). A CVD-coated turning insert (grade T9115) was used for the machining test. The cutting conditions corresponded to common machining conditions in the automotive industry and were set as follows: circumferential speed 200 m.min−1, material removal depth 1.5 mm, tool displacement per rotation 0.2 mm.rev−1; no cooling was used.
The initial semi-finished products were rough-machined bars with a diameter of 50 mm, which were turned until they were 20 mm in diameter and 100 mm long. Turning was only longitudinal in order to load the edge of the blade on the one side. A total of five bars were turned, for a total length of machined material of 500 mm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Experimental Ingot Production

Three experimental heats with different bismuth content were produced in the same way. The CMnCr steel melt was cast from AIF into a ladle at 1680 °C. Bismuth was added into the steel in a ladle at 1575 °C. The efficiency of alloying with bismuth varied for individual heats and ranged from 9.8 to 15.2 wt. %. When alloying bismuth into the heat inside the ladle, its usability was five times higher compared to alloying directly in the AIF crucible, and vaporization of bismuth was very easy. This fact is related to the small depth of the melt in the AIF crucible, which the authors have verified experimentally in the past. The use of bismuth was only 3.3 wt. % in this case.
The chemical composition of the individual heats is given in Table 1. The first heat did not contain bismuth, and the second and third heats were alloyed with 0.08 wt. % or 0.12 wt. %.

3.2. Formability

Formability was expressed as the temperature dependence of the fracture strain intensity of the tested material. Bismuth-free CMnCr steel was difficult to form. The formability of steels further decreased with the increasing content of bismuth in the steel, i.e., with a bismuth content of 0.08 wt. % by 25%, and 0.12 wt. % by 40% compared to CMnCr steel without bismuth. The results are summarized in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3, which show that the formability of the steels increases with degreasing forming temperature and an increasing strain rate.
Based on the results of formability tests, a forming temperature range of 1160–1050 °C and strain rate of 1.94 s−1 were established for forging of the bars.

3.3. Mechanical Properties

The results of the mechanical tests are summarized in Table 2. It is evident that an increasing content of bismuth increases yield stress and tensile strength while decreasing ductility and contraction. The optimal combination of strength and stress, plastic properties and toughness was achieved for CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi.

3.4. Machinability Tests

The machinability of the steel was evaluated on the basis of tool wear after 30 min of machining, chip shape, and surface roughness.
For bismuth-free CMnCr steel, a higher temperature in the cutting area was reached, which resulted in build-up on the edge of the tool, see Figure 4a. A higher degree of wear of the tool edge was also observed. The chip formation was very similar to Bi alloy steels, but their “C” shape was more open, and the chip broke further from the flank of the tool, see Figure 5a.
CMnCr steel with 0.08% Bi appeared to be the most suitable due to the slight wear of the tool, see Figure 4b. The chips were satisfactory in shape and size, see Figure 5b.
The tool wear for CMnCr steel with 0.12% Bi was lower than for steel without Bi, see Figure 4c. The chip formation and shape were optimal, see Figure 5c. The chips were tiny and easily removed from the cut when breaking them away from the tip. A longer spiral chip was formed as the tip of the workpiece (bar) was reached, but removal from the cutting point was also good without affecting the already machined surface.
The surface roughness of the machined bars was monitored during the machinability tests, see Figure 6. The best surface roughness was observed for steel with 0.12 wt. % Bi. Steel with 0.12 wt. % Bi had the best surface roughness, see Figure 6, because it possessed the highest hardness, 247 HBW, and the lowest absorbed energy, 18 J, see Table 2.

3.5. Structural Analysis, Microcleanliness, X-ray Microanalysis

Distribution of sulfur inclusions in a cross-section of the steel bars evaluated by Baumann print showed that in the steel with 0.12 wt. % of Bi and the steel without Bi, dot-shaped sulfur segregations were essentially uniformly distributed over the whole area; Figure 7a,c. For the steel with 0.08 wt. % of Bi, both dot-like and ray-ordered sulfur segregations were observed, see Figure 7b.
Microcleanliness analyses showed that the amount sulfur inclusions and their uneven distribution in steel matrix was similar for all test samples (evaluation number was 1.1 according to SEP 1572). Relatively small, spherical, or slightly elongated sulfidic inclusions were observed, see Figure 8.
Electron microscopic analysis of Bi-free CMnCr steel revealed numerous clusters of both elongated gray particles and various dark particles. Using X-ray microanalysis, their chemical composition was identified as manganese sulfides and aluminum oxides. The characteristic Energy dispersive X-ray spectra (EDX) of these particles are shown in Figure 9, and their composition in Table 3.
In addition to MnS and Al2O3, light bismuth particles were detected in CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi. The EDX spectra characteristic of individual particles are shown in Figure 10, and their chemical composition is stated in Table 4.
For the area distribution of the individual elements in the inclusions Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) mapping when each element has a different color, see Figure 11.
CMnCr steel with 0.12% Bi contained Bi particles, which were precipitated on manganese sulfides, or on complex particles consisting of manganese sulfide and aluminum oxide. The small individual Bi particles were predominantly globular, and the coarser particles were usually elongated. Typical EDX phase spectra are shown in Figure 12, the chemical compositions in Table 5, and the mapping results in Figure 13.
Non-metallic particles were formed in all evaluated samples, identified as manganese sulfides, aluminum oxides, or oxysulfides. These inclusions were found both singly and in clusters. In steel with 0.12 wt. % Bi and steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi, very different and strikingly bright particles were contrasted, and their chemical composition corresponded to bismuth. These particles formed separately in the form of globules, but also as envelopes of elongated MnS or Al2O3 particles precipitated in rows. The frequency of Bi particles was highest for steel with 0.12% Bi.
The microstructure of all tested steels was very similar, and was composed of ferrite and pearlite with islands of bainite. Towards the center of the bars, variable shapes and sizes of bainite blocks were observed. The microstructure of CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi from the subsurface and axial area of the bar is illustrated on Figure 14 and Figure 15.

4. Conclusions

This article compares the technological and material properties of CMnCr steels with 0 wt. % Bi, 0.08 wt. % Bi and 0.12 wt. % Bi.
The most important conclusions can be summarized as follows:
  • For producing small heats in atmospheric-induction melting furnaces, it is best to cast the steel melt into a ladle and alloy it there using bismuth in the form of a filled profile with a composition of 93 wt. % Bi and 7 wt. % CaCO3.
  • The Bi alloying efficiency was around 20%.
  • Using plastometric tests, the range of forming temperatures was set at 1160–1050 °C, and the most suitable strain rate was 1.94 s−1.
  • With increasing Bi content, the formability of the steels decreased in both the torsion tests and the forgings.
  • Manganese sulfides, aluminum oxides, or oxysulfides, which were segregated both individually and in clusters, were found in the matrix of all tested steels. In steels with Bi, the Bi particles were segregated both separately in the form of globules, but also as envelopes of elongated MnS or Al2O3 particles segregated in rows.
  • Distribution of sulfur inclusions evaluated by Baumann print showed that the occurrence of sulfur segregations in the steel with 0.12 wt. % of Bi and the steel without Bi was essentially uniform over the whole area; these were dot-shaped sulfur segregations. For the steel with 0.08 wt. % of Bi, both dot-like and ray-ordered sulfur segregations were observed.
  • Microstructure of steels was very similar ferritic–pearlitic, with islands of bainite. Towards the center of the bars, variable shapes and sizes of bainite blocks were observed.
  • Machinability tests showed that in terms of the least tool wear, chip formation and shape, and heat dissipation, CrMnCr steel alloyed with 0.08 wt. % Bi was the most satisfactory.
  • In further research activities, it would be appropriate to verify the effect of slightly lower content than 0.08 wt. % of Bi on the properties of the CMnCr steel.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.K. and P.J.; methodology, V.K., Z.K., L.K., P.J. and O.K.; Validation, P.J.; formal analysis, V.K. and P.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the EU Regional Development Fund within the Operational Programme Research, Development and Education under the aegis of Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic; Project number CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_049/0008426.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luiz, N.E.; Machado, A.R. Development trends and review of free-machining steels, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. J. Eng. Manuf. 2008, 222, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Essel, I. Machinability Enhancement of Non-Leaded Free Cutting Steels. Ph.D. Thesis, Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Živković, D.; Štrbac, N.; Ekinović, S.; Begović, E. Lead-Free Free-Cutting Steels as Modern Environmentally Friendly Materials. ResearchGate. 2011. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281812810 (accessed on 8 September 2021).
  4. Roper, C.R., Jr.; Strattan, J.K.; Hetherington, R., Jr.; Hiller, A.J.; Lukens Inc. Process for Making Resulfurized Machinable Steel. U.S. Patent 4,373,967, 15 February 1983. [Google Scholar]
  5. Thivellier, D.; Seraphin, L.; Tricot, R. Free Machining Steel. U.S. Patent 4,004,922, 25 January 1977. [Google Scholar]
  6. Samuels, L.E. Optical Microscopy of Carbon Steels; ASM International: Almere, The Netherlands, 1980; 594p, ISBN 978-0871700827. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ray, K.K.; Das, J.; Dixit, A.; Chakraborty, M.; Chakravorty, S.; Guha, S.N. Effect of cold deformation on the machinability of a free cutting steel. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2006, 21, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sridhar, G. Failure Analysis of Free-Cutting Grade Steels: A Case Study. PROCEEDINGS: COFA-1997©NML JAMSHEDPUR; pp. 121–139. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/297711126.pdf (accessed on 17 September 2021).
  9. Ånmark, N.; Karasev, A.; Jönsson, P.G. The effect of different non-metallic inclusions on the machinability of steels. Materials 2015, 8, 751–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nazabal, J.L.; Urcola, J.J.; Fuentes, M. Hot Ductility of Leaded Free-Cutting Steels. Metallography 1984, 17, 439–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, S.; Li, Z.; Fan, T.; Fu, J. Effect of Bismuth on Sulfide in High Sulfur Free-cutting Steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 611, 012017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Desaigues, C.; Lescalier, A.; Bomont, O. High Strength Steel solutions for automotive parts: State of the art of machinability enhancement and further developments. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on High Speed Machining, Darmstadt, Germany, 26–27 September 2013; TU Darmstadt: Darmstadt, Germany, 2013; pp. 270–277. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kato, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yamada, M. Stress Distribution at the Interface Betweeen Tool and Chip in Machining. J. Eng. Ind. 1972, 94, 683–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pickering, F.B.; Gladman, T. A Modern Approach to Ferrous Metallography. Steel Coal 1962, 1178–1187. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pielet, H.M.; Frank, L.A.; Edgar, W.; Alavanja, M. Steel Product with Globular Manganese Sulfide Inclusions. U.S. Patent 4,881,990, 21 November 1989. [Google Scholar]
  16. Garcia, C.I.; Hua, M.; Miller, M.K.; Deardo, A.J. Application of Grain Boundary Engineering in Lead-free “Green Steel”. ISIJ Int. 2003, 43, 2023–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Arendt, C. Angepasste Stähle zur Effektiven und Umweltgerechten Drehbearbeitung. Ph.D. Thesis, Leigniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ryabov, A.V.; Dyakonov, A.A.; Vakhitov, M.G. A new free-machining steel containing bismuth and calcium. Mater. Sci. Forum 2016, 857, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chaus, S.H. Application of Bismuth for Solidification Structure Refinement and Properties Enhancement in As-cast High-speed Steels. ISIJ Int. 2005, 45, 1297–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nordberg, G.F.; Fowler, B.A.; Nordberg, M.; Frieberg, L. Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, 3rd ed.; Academic Press, Inc.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 433–443. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, H.T.; Chen, W.Q. Hot ductility of eco-friendly low carbon resulphurised free cutting steel with bismuth. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2014, 41, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, H.; Yu, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, Q.; Wang, G. Effect of Mn/S Ratio on the Hot Ductility of Eco-friendly Bi-S based Free Cutting Steel. High Temp. Mater. Proc. 2014, 33, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Koepfer, C. Anatomy of Free Machining Steel. Available online: https://www.productionmachining.com/articles/anatomy-of-free-machining-steel (accessed on 24 September 2021).
  24. Kim, M.S.; Lee, H.J.; Chang, Y.W. The Effect of Mn/S Ratio on Hot Ductility of Bi Bearing Free Cutting Steels. Key Eng. Mater. 2007, 345–346, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Onderka, B.; Jendrzejczyk-Handzlik, D.; Fitzner, K. Thermodynamic properties and phase equilibria in the ternary Cu-Pb-Fe system. Arch. Metal. Mater. 2013, 58, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Salazar, K.; Marcia, K.M. Metal Prices in the United States through 2010; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2013; pp. 17–18. Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5188/sir2012-5188.pdf (accessed on 22 June 2021).
  27. Peng, H.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhou, C. Effect of MnS and Its Size on the Heterogeneous Nucleation and Precipitation of Bismuth in Steel. Indian Inst. Met. 2019, 73, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dependence of the fracture strain intensity ( S e f ) on the test temperature (Tf), and strain rate, Bi-free steel.
Figure 1. Dependence of the fracture strain intensity ( S e f ) on the test temperature (Tf), and strain rate, Bi-free steel.
Metals 12 00301 g001
Figure 2. Dependence of the fracture strain intensity ( S e f ) on the test temperature (Tf), and strain rate, 0.08 wt. % Bi.
Figure 2. Dependence of the fracture strain intensity ( S e f ) on the test temperature (Tf), and strain rate, 0.08 wt. % Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g002
Figure 3. Dependence of the fracture strain intensity ( S e f ) on the test temperature (Tf), and strain rate, 0.12 wt.% Bi.
Figure 3. Dependence of the fracture strain intensity ( S e f ) on the test temperature (Tf), and strain rate, 0.12 wt.% Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g003
Figure 4. Wear of inserts after 30 min of machining a CMnCr steel bar: (a) Bi-free, wear of the insert unsatisfactory; (b) 0.08% Bi, wear of the insert satisfactory; (c) 0.12% Bi, wear of the insert satisfactory.
Figure 4. Wear of inserts after 30 min of machining a CMnCr steel bar: (a) Bi-free, wear of the insert unsatisfactory; (b) 0.08% Bi, wear of the insert satisfactory; (c) 0.12% Bi, wear of the insert satisfactory.
Metals 12 00301 g004
Figure 5. Chips after 30 min of machining of CMnCr steel ingots: (a) Bi-free, chips are satisfactory; (b) 0.08% Bi, chips are satisfactory; (c) 0.12% Bi, chips are satisfactory.
Figure 5. Chips after 30 min of machining of CMnCr steel ingots: (a) Bi-free, chips are satisfactory; (b) 0.08% Bi, chips are satisfactory; (c) 0.12% Bi, chips are satisfactory.
Metals 12 00301 g005
Figure 6. Dependence of the surface roughness of the material over time during the machinability tests of CMnCr steels with different Bi contents.
Figure 6. Dependence of the surface roughness of the material over time during the machinability tests of CMnCr steels with different Bi contents.
Metals 12 00301 g006
Figure 7. Results of Baumann print of the CMnCr steel: (a) without Bi, (b) with 0.08 wt. % Bi, (c) with 0.12 wt. % Bi.
Figure 7. Results of Baumann print of the CMnCr steel: (a) without Bi, (b) with 0.08 wt. % Bi, (c) with 0.12 wt. % Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g007
Figure 8. An example of sulfides in the CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % of Bi.
Figure 8. An example of sulfides in the CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % of Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g008
Figure 9. EDX spectra of individual particles in Bi-free CMnCr steel.
Figure 9. EDX spectra of individual particles in Bi-free CMnCr steel.
Metals 12 00301 g009
Figure 10. EDX spectra of individual particles in CMnCr steel with 0.08% Bi.
Figure 10. EDX spectra of individual particles in CMnCr steel with 0.08% Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g010
Figure 11. EDS mapping—distribution of individual elements (b) Iron, (c) Silicon, (d) Oxygen, (e) Bismuth, (f) Manganese, (g) Aluminiumin a (a) complex particle with Bi in CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt.% Bi.
Figure 11. EDS mapping—distribution of individual elements (b) Iron, (c) Silicon, (d) Oxygen, (e) Bismuth, (f) Manganese, (g) Aluminiumin a (a) complex particle with Bi in CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt.% Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g011
Figure 12. EDX spectra of complex particles in CMnCr steel with 0.12 wt. % Bi.
Figure 12. EDX spectra of complex particles in CMnCr steel with 0.12 wt. % Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g012
Figure 13. EDS mapping—distribution of individual elements (b) Aluminium, (c) Sulphur, (d) Iron, (e) Bismuth, (f) Oxygen, (g) Manganese in a (a) complex particle with Bi, in CMnCr steel with 0.12 wt. % Bi.
Figure 13. EDS mapping—distribution of individual elements (b) Aluminium, (c) Sulphur, (d) Iron, (e) Bismuth, (f) Oxygen, (g) Manganese in a (a) complex particle with Bi, in CMnCr steel with 0.12 wt. % Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g013
Figure 14. Microstructure in the subsurface area of CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi.
Figure 14. Microstructure in the subsurface area of CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g014
Figure 15. Microstructure in the axial area of CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi.
Figure 15. Microstructure in the axial area of CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi.
Metals 12 00301 g015
Table 1. Chemical composition of the CMnCr steels [wt. %].
Table 1. Chemical composition of the CMnCr steels [wt. %].
Heat No.CMnSiAlSCuNiCrBiMn/S
10.191.490.050.0760.0240.050.081.16-62.1
20.191.370.070.0820.0220.050.071.140.0862.3
30.211.280.050.0560.0210.070.071.210.1261.0
Table 2. Mechanical properties of CMnCr steels.
Table 2. Mechanical properties of CMnCr steels.
CMnCr SteelTensile StrengthYield StressElongationReduction of AreaAbsorbed
Energy
HBW
187.5/2.5
[MPa][MPa][%][%][J]
Bi-free684429154230222
0.08 wt. % Bi592343204774178
0.12 wt. % Bi722480133718247
Table 3. Chemical composition of particles in Bi-free CMnCr steel [wt. %].
Table 3. Chemical composition of particles in Bi-free CMnCr steel [wt. %].
ElementsOAlSMn
spectrum 1-3.735.860.5
spectrum 3--40.060.0
spectrum 457.542.5--
Table 4. Chemical composition [in wt. %] of individual areas in inclusions, CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi [wt. %].
Table 4. Chemical composition [in wt. %] of individual areas in inclusions, CMnCr steel with 0.08 wt. % Bi [wt. %].
ElementsOAlSMnBi
spectrum 137.620.01.82.338.3
spectrum 2----100
Table 5. Local chemical composition [in wt. %] of individual parts of non-metallic inclusions, steel with 0.12 wt. % Bi [wt. %].
Table 5. Local chemical composition [in wt. %] of individual parts of non-metallic inclusions, steel with 0.12 wt. % Bi [wt. %].
ElementsOAlSMnBi
spectrum 1--40.359.7-
spectrum 250.245.70.23.9-
spectrum 39.91.3--88.8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurka, V.; Kuboň, Z.; Kander, L.; Jonšta, P.; Kotásek, O. The Effect of Bismuth on Technological and Material Characteristics of Low-Alloyed Automotive Steels with a Good Machinability. Metals 2022, 12, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12020301

AMA Style

Kurka V, Kuboň Z, Kander L, Jonšta P, Kotásek O. The Effect of Bismuth on Technological and Material Characteristics of Low-Alloyed Automotive Steels with a Good Machinability. Metals. 2022; 12(2):301. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12020301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurka, Vladislav, Zdeněk Kuboň, Ladislav Kander, Petr Jonšta, and Ondřej Kotásek. 2022. "The Effect of Bismuth on Technological and Material Characteristics of Low-Alloyed Automotive Steels with a Good Machinability" Metals 12, no. 2: 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12020301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop