Effect of Ti Addition on the Precipitation Mechanism and Precipitate Size in Nb-Microalloyed Steels

Abstract

The effect of Ti microalloying on the precipitation of NbC particles in Nb-microalloyed and Nb-Ti-microalloyed steels was investigated by scanning transmission electron microscopy. The experimental results illustrate that NbC precipitates tend to be formed via a conventional “nucleation and growth” mechanism in Ti-free steel, while the particles would be precipitated as a complex form of TiN cuboid core and NbC hemispherical cap in Ti-Nb-microalloyed steel with 0.009 wt.% Ti and 0.0046 wt.% N. Ti microalloying contributed to the refinement of the precipitate size, and an enhancement of the volume fraction of NbC particles was also found based on the experimental observations.

1. Introduction

Structural steels with heavy thickness are commonly used in complex constructions, such as offshore oil platforms, large-scale bridges and so on [1,2,3], which usually operate in low-temperature environments. To meet the safety requirements [4,5,6], high strength as well as excellent toughness are necessary for heavy structural steels. It has been reported that very fine and homogeneous grains are beneficial for simultaneously improving strength and toughness. Thermomechanical control processing (TMCP) has been proven to be an effective approach to the achievement of fine grains and has been widely applied in the manufacturing of hot rolled steels, in which sufficient strain accumulation before phase transformation is generally considered to be an essential issue [7,8]. However, it is always a challenge for heavy structural steels, because their limited reduction during the hot rolling process cannot bring about enough strain accumulation for the stimulation of a “strain-induced phase transformation” to refine the grain size.

To control the grain size in heavy structural steels, a new method named the “boundary-induced transformation (BIT)” mechanism [9,10,11] has been proposed, in which abundant austenite grain boundaries are reasonably used to promote the nucleation of thephase transformation from austenite to ferrite. Obviously, whether the BIT mechanism can be realized or not depends strongly on the achievement of fine austenite grains during finish rolling. Therefore, compared to conventional TMCP, how to adjust the critical strain for dynamic recrystallization (DRX) and how to use the limited reduction ratio effectively become the key factors for this method. The investigation in our previous work shows that Ti microalloying is conducive to the grain refinement of heavy structural steels [12]. The primary reason for grain refinement can be attributed to the advantage of the inhibitory effect of TiN precipitates on grain growth during reheating before rough rolling.

Much work has been carried out on the effect of Ti addition on the size of TiN particles, and the results in most steels showed that TiN particles formed during solidification or in the heat-affected zone usually have cuboidal shapes and relatively large sizes at the micron level [13,14,15]. Obviously, such TiN particles formed from the liquid phase cannot play any role in the improvement of the mechanical properties of the final product, while those precipitated in the solid phase usually have a fine size at the nanometer level [16], which is beneficial for the control of austenite grain size and contributes to the improvement of mechanical properties.

In addition, fine TiN particles acting as nucleation cores for NbC particles and resulting in the formation of TiN-NbC composites during subsequent finish rolling have also been reported [17,18]. This phenomenon offers an alternative approach to strain-induced precipitation of NbC, which can be reasonably utilized for the microstructural control of heavy structural steels with limited strain accumulation. However, the effect of Ti microalloying on the size and distribution of NbC has not been reported. In the present work, the precipitation behaviour of NbC particles and the precipitate size in Ti-free and Ti-microalloyed steels were investigated in detail. The results are useful for considering the control of microstructure and mechanical properties for heavy structural steels with limited reduction ratios and low Nb contents.

2. Experimental Materials and Methods

The chemical compositions of the heavy hot-rolled H-beam steels used in the present research are shown in

Table 1. Chemical composition of the experimental steels (wt.%).

Steels	C	Mn	Si	P	S	Ti	Nb	V	Al	N
S1	0.18	1.51	0.54	0.006	0.003	0.002	0.031	0.023	0.012	0.0047
S2	0.12	1.49	0.31	0.004	0.003	0.009	0.038	0.034	0.013	0.0046

. Experimental steel S1 is Nb-microalloyed steel, in which trace amounts of Ti element of approximately 0.002 wt.% are introduced due to the raw materials during steelmaking. Steel S2 is Ti- and Nb-microalloyed steel, in which a Ti addition of approximately 0.009 wt.% is adapted with the aim of evaluating the influence of the Ti element. The N contents in both steels are approximately 40 ppm.

The experimental steels were forged according to the deformation process schematically shown in Figure 1. The total compression ratio during forging was approximately 2.5. The specimens, with sizes of 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm, were cut from forged billets for the observation of precipitates. The forged specimens were mechanically polished and etched in a solution of 5% natal. The cellulose acetate film, with a thickness of 100 μm, was attached onto the etched specimens using acetone, and then the dried cellulose acetate films were extracted from the specimen surfaces. The carbon was evaporated onto these acetate films in a vacuum atmosphere. The carbon replicas were achieved by dissolving cellulose acetate films in acetone, and then moved onto a copper grid. Carbon extraction replicas were then applied to investigate the morphology and size of precipitates by a JEOL JEM 2100F field emission transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), OXFORD X-MAX TSR energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Oxford Instruments, Oxford, United Kingdom), and a high-resolution FEI Titan scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM, FEI company, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 illustrates typical transmission electron microscope (TEM) images obtained from carbon extraction replicas showing the morphology and size of the precipitates in steel S1 and S2 after hot forging. It can be seen that some precipitates were randomly dispersed in both steels. Compared to those in steel S1 (Figure 2a), the precipitates in steel S2 (Figure 2b) have relatively small sizes and are more uniform throughout the matrix.

A high-resolution TEM image of random precipitates in steel S1 is shown in Figure 3. It is seen that the precipitates in steel S1 are mainly spherical with a size of approximately 50 nm. A further Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of the composition distribution in this precipitate illustrates that the particle is mainly composed of Nb and a small amount of V and Ti elements. All the precipitates in Figure 2a were measured by EDS analysis, and the corresponding chemical compositions for each precipitate are summarized in

Table 2. Analysis of particle size and the contents of Nb/V/Ti elements in those precipitates in Figure 2a (steel S1).

Class	ECD (µm)	Ti (wt.%)	V (wt.%)	Nb (wt.%)
TiVNb	0.061678	2.916971	1.943436	59.36655
VNb	0.09212	-	1.024304	1.433306
TiVNb	0.092586	4.130418	1.924443	57.43785
TiVNb	0.064408	1.74785	2.035784	54.06454
VNb	0.065468	-	2.897306	49.08118
VNb	0.062784	-	4.321418	46.55011
TiVNb	0.070164	1.636067	1.092925	59.78169
TiVNb	0.056887	1.221049	1.176167	60.00959
TiVNb	0.086033	1.787149	1.115035	63.06081
TiVNb	0.070653	1.356135	1.294701	54.77613
TiVNb	0.057638	1.54289	1.727562	51.45393
TiVNb	0.062647	1.074376	3.604971	49.94766
TiVNb	0.068927	2.083507	1.738859	49.53244
TiVNb	0.047122	1.339961	2.881639	40.23057

. It should be noted that there is always a certain amount of Cu element for each precipitate according to the EDS results, which is caused by the copper grid supporting the carbon film. The Cu content in each precipitate is not shown in Table 2.

It can be seen from Table 2 that almost all the precipitates in steel S1 are composed of Nb, V and Ti elements, although the contents of V and Ti elements usually have a relatively low value in these precipitates, even if there are three particles without Ti elements. Generally, the relative atomic weights of Nb, V and Ti elements are 92.9, 50.9 and 47.9, respectively. Assuming that the particles are the complex carbonitrides of Nb/V/Ti, the composition ratio for each element should be close to 2:1:1 in a random precipitate. However, based on the analysis results by TEM and EDS, as shown in Table 2, it can be found that the Nb contents in most precipitates are larger than 40%, while the contents of Ti and V are both less than 5% in steel S1. It is reasonable to conclude that the particles are dominantly Nb(C, N) precipitates with small amounts of Ti and V solutes. As mentioned above, Ti element clustered in these precipitates in steel S1 should be a residual element during steel-making. Research based on thermodynamic and kinetic theoretical analyses [13,19] shows that there is a considerable binding ability between Ti and N elements, and that there is a strong tendency to form TiN particles, even if the content of Ti element is very low.

The same analyses are carried out for steel S2 with 0.009 wt.% Ti addition. The typical morphology of a random precipitate in Figure 2b and its corresponding composition distribution are shown in Figure 4. As seen from Figure 4, the precipitate in steel S2 exhibits a complex structural feature, i.e., a NbC hemispherical cap was attached to a TiN cuboid core, as reported in previous work [18]. As known, TiN particles are usually formed at an elevated temperature compared to NbC particles. During the hot working and/or subsequent cooling process, extensive NbC particles would heterogeneously nucleate along the pre-formed TiN particles and then formed complex TiN-NbC particles.

The detailed analyses for the composition of all the precipitates in Figure 2b are summarized in

Table 3. Measurement of size and the corresponding element contents for each particle in Figure 2b (steel S2).

Class	ECD (µm)	Ti (wt.%)	V (wt.%)	Nb (wt.%)
TiVNb	0.0338	20.42	4.30	40.30
TiVNb	0.0324	13.21	3.24	43.05
TiVNb	0.0256	15.82	5.26	40.26
TiVNb	0.0298	15.81	4.34	35.67
TiVNb	0.0401	22.25	3.67	40.63
TiVNb	0.0266	8.75	2.69	41.18
TiVNb	0.0222	13.57	5.16	28.19
TiVNb	0.0255	12.67	5.56	38.87
TiVNb	0.0272	16.04	4.93	31.57
TiVNb	0.0235	14.32	5.25	32.04
TiVNb	0.0243	12.40	5.47	28.69
TiVNb	0.0271	8.61	3.15	41.19
TiVNb	0.0298	16.72	4.89	30.29
TiVNb	0.0274	8.81	4.18	41.79
TiVNb	0.0298	16.89	5.96	29.86
TiVNb	0.0327	11.44	4.56	33.77
TiVNb	0.0250	13.39	6.17	28.91
TiN	0.0319	4.57	-	-
TiN	0.0287	5.88	-	-

. As can be seen, almost all the precipitates are composed of Nb, V and Ti elements, except for two TiN particles. In particular, the proportion of Ti content in each precipitate is significantly higher than that in steel S1. Therefore, combined with the morphology observation in Figure 3, it can be concluded that the TiN-NbC complex particles are the dominant feature in the Ti-microalloyed steel. Obviously, the nucleation mechanism of precipitates in steel S2 is significantly different from that in steel S1; that is, the dominant mechanism for NbC particles in Ti-free steel is strain-induced precipitates, while epitaxial growth occurs in NbC on TiN particles in Ti-microalloyed steel. It is noteworthy that this epitaxial growth mechanism exhibits great potential value in the microstructure control of heavy structural steels, because their limited reduction ratio strongly restrains the advantage of strain-induced NbC precipitation.

A further analysis based on the morphology of the particles in Figure 4 shows that the TiN core has a size of approximately 25 nm, and that the size of the complex TiN-NbC particle is approximately 40 nm. The size of each precipitate observed in Figure 2b (steel S2) can also be found in Table 3. Comparing the values of particle size in Table 2 and Table 3, it can be found that the particle size in steel S2 is significantly smaller than that in steel S1, which agrees well with the morphology observation in Figure 2. To better understand the influence of Ti microalloying on the size and type of precipitates, a more accurate description based on statistical analysis of more particles is necessary. Several images were taken continuously from the carbon extraction replicas of both steels, and the particle size and composition were analyzed, respectively.

For steel S1, 11 images with a scanning area of 7.6 μm × 7.2 μm were obtained from TEM observations, in which a total of 81 particles were found, and the corresponding results, including precipitate size and composition, are summarized in

Table 4. Statistical analyses of the size and composition of precipitates in steel S1.

No	Number	Category	Size(µm)	Ti (wt.%)	V (wt.%)	Nb (wt.%)
1	9	Min	0.0093	0	0.065	0
		Max	0.1076	3.423	12.321	65.854
		Mean	0.0748	1.716	3.085	48.450
2	14	Min	0.0471	0	1.093	1.433
		Max	0.0926	4.130	4.321	63.061
		Mean	0.0685	1.488	2.055	49.766
3	7	Min	0.0535	1.372	1.042	59.221
		Max	0.0757	3.772	2.031	66.196
		Mean	0.0662	2.837	1.369	62.549
4	5	Min	0.0380	1.562	1.057	49.157
		Max	0.0762	5.421	2.353	60.091
		Mean	0.0648	3.589	1.457	56.521
5	6	Min	0.0550	0	1.223	39.416
		Max	0.0827	8.229	2.625	56.854
		Mean	0.0692	4.380	1.733	48.848
6	9	Min	0.0117	2.699	0	0
		Max	0.0841	40.391	4.261	60.992
		Mean	0.0367	15.991	1.464	42.004
7	17	Min	0.0195	1.089	1.005	39.128
		Max	0.1218	32.832	9.138	62.216
		Mean	0.0438	11.343	3.053	47.082
8	3	Min	0.0117	2.991	1.991	39.755
		Max	0.0489	16.257	4.665	57.554
		Mean	0.0344	9.150	3.698	47.648
9	2	Min	0.0327	2.944	1.118	49.830
		Max	0.0834	16.450	2.620	57.645
		Mean	0.0580	9.697	1.869	53.734
10	1	-	0.0256	18.88	1.992	48.615
11	8	Min	0.0138	0	1.095	6.650
		Max	0.0282	38.829	5.628	55.818
		Mean	0.0285	10.921	2.843	41.572

. The precipitate sizes ranged from 9.3 to 121.8 nm, and the average size of all precipitates was 54.1 nm. The distribution of the precipitates in steel S1, as shown in Figure 5, illustrates that the particles with a size of approximately 60 nm have the largest proportion and that approximately 15% of precipitates have a size larger than 80 nm.

The McCall-Boyd method is usually used to determine the volume fraction of the second phase particles, and can be calculated as indicated by Equation (1) [20,21]:

$$V_f=\left(\frac{1.4\pi }{6}\right)\times \left(\frac{N{D}_{\mathrm{mean}}^3}{A{D}_{\max }}\right)$$

(1)

where D_mean and D_max are the average diameter and the maximum diameter of particles, respectively, N is the number of particles and A is the total observation area containing those measured particles. According to Equation (1) and the statistical data for steel S1, it should be noted that the volume fraction of NbC precipitates is approximately 0.0128% for steel S1.

In general, the equilibrium solubility for Nb and C atoms in the matrix strongly depends on temperature and can be expressed as follows [22]:

$$\log [Nb][C]=3.72-\frac{8534}{T}$$

(2)

where [Nb] and [C] are the concentrations of Nb and C, respectively, and T is the temperature. For steel S1 with 0.18 wt.% C and 0.031 wt.% Nb, the volume fraction of NbC precipitates depending on the temperature is illustrated in Figure 6. The maximum volume fraction of NbC precipitates reached approximately 0.0345% S1 when steel S1 was compressed at 850 °C and then cooled to room temperature. This deviation between the experimental and calculated values suggests that the precipitation of NbC particles could not be completed kinetically under the current forge processing. The primary reason for this incomplete precipitation can be attributed to low strain accumulation; that is, the strain accumulation during forge processing is not large enough to stimulate the strain-induced precipitation mechanism, and results in only approximately 37% of NbC particles precipitated from the matrix.

For steel S2, 356 particles were achieved based on six images with a scanning area of 3.8 μm × 3.6 μm. The statistical results in

Table 5. Statistical analyses of the size and composition of precipitates in steel S2.

No	Number	Category	Size (μm)	Ti (wt.%)	V (wt.%)	Nb (wt.%)
1	23	Min	0.0055	4.478	0	0
		Max	0.0402	38.839	8.337	50.396
		Mean	0.0240	13.503	4.161	27.137
2	51	Min	0.0169	2.691	0	0
		Max	0.0547	33.021	6.297	43.046
		Mean	0.0288	11.577	3.705	25.912
3	62	Min	0.0138	7.155	1.709	20.783
		Max	0.0507	34.159	7.276	46.006
		Mean	0.0270	15.276	5.017	34.843
4	77	Min	0.0046	0	0	2.861
		Max	0.0363	23.357	7.132	42.568
		Mean	0.0241	12.880	4.846	32.551
5	91	Min	0.0059	7.503	3.751	22.347
		Max	0.0363	26.323	7.938	45.037
		Mean	0.0234	14.438	5.178	35.593
6	52	Min	0.0162	5.180	2.936	19.270
		Max	0.0393	21.630	7.172	40.043
		Mean	0.0254	13.561	4.691	30.488

show that the particle size in steel S2 is in the range from 4.6 to 54.7 nm, and that the average size of the particles is approximately 25.4 nm. The distribution of the precipitate size in steel S2 is described in Figure 7. Approximately 85% of the precipitates had a size less than 30 nm. The application of these values to Equation (1) shows that the volume fraction of precipitates in steel S2 is approximately 0.095% based on the experimental observations.

As mentioned above, TiN particles are usually precipitated at a high temperature, and then would provide nuclei for the epitaxial growth of NbC particles. The solubility products of TiN in austenite can be described as previously reported [23] in Equation (3)

$$\log [Ti][N]=4.94-\frac{14400}{T}$$

(3)

where [Ti] and [N] are equilibrium concentrations of Ti and N at a temperature of T. The precipitation of NbC and TiN particles in steel S2 at different temperatures is calculated according to Equations (2) and (3), and the corresponding results are shown in Figure 8. The calculated [Ti] and [N] values at 1150 °C are 0.0012 and 0.0023, respectively. Thus, the volume fraction of TiN particles at this temperature is approximately 0.007%. When steel S2 is subjected to a subsequent compression at 850 °C, the volume fraction of TiN tends to be slightly increased to 0.008%. Meanwhile, NbC begins to precipitate, and the maximum volume fraction of NbC calculated according to Equation (2) is 0.042% at this condition. Therefore, the total fraction of precipitates in steel S2 is 0.050%. It is noted that this is a smaller value than that obtained from experimental observations. The possible reason for this difference might be the fact that there are actually some different types of precipitates, including Ti and Nb carbonitrides and/or V(C, N), in the microalloyed steel, not just TiN and NbC particles. On the other hand, due to the complex structure characterized by the TiN cuboid core and NbC hemispherical cap, the statistics regarding their sizes may not be accurate, resulting in a larger value of the volume fraction of precipitates calculated based on Equation (1). The detailed reasons will be investigated in our future work.

The above results clearly show that the average size of the complex TiN-NbC precipitates in steel S2 is less than that of the NbC precipitates in steel S1, while the volume fraction of precipitates in steel S2 is significantly larger than that in steel S1. Although there is an obvious difference in Nb and C contents between steel S1 and S2, it has no significant effect on the amount of NbC precipitates (0.0345% vs. 0.0420% at 850 °C). Therefore, it can be confirmed that Ti microalloying is the factor most directly responsible for the difference in the size and quantity of precipitates between the two steels. The Ti addition and the resulting TiN particles may provide abundant nuclei for NbC particles and then accelerate NbC precipitation. In this event, NbC precipitation no longer required nucleation, but only epitaxial growth attached to TiN particles. These extensive pre-existing TiN particles make the precipitation of NbC particles more dispersed, and these NbC precipitates attached to TiN particles would consume a majority of Nb atoms in the matrix, which effectively reduces the driving force for the coarsening of NbC particles. Therefore, the mechanism of epitaxial growth of NbC on pre-existing TiN is usually conducive to the formation of fine and dispersed complex particles. In other words, NbC precipitation in Ti-microalloyed steels does not need to be strongly dependent on large strain accumulation, i.e., the strain-induced precipitation mechanism. This result suggests that it is more profitable to control the microstructure in heavy structural steels with limited reduction during hot rolling by Ti microalloying; for example, finer and more dispersed particles will play an important role in suppressing static recrystallization during the pass interval of finishing rolling.

4. Conclusions

(1)

Ti addition changes the precipitation mechanism of NbC particles in Nb-microalloyed steels. Nucleation and subsequent growth are the dominant precipitation mechanisms of NbC particles in Nb-microalloyed steel, while they change to epitaxial growth of NbC particles attached to pre-existing TiN in Ti-Nb-microalloyed steel.

(2)

The average size of the NbC precipitates is 54.1 nm, and the volume fraction is 0.0128% in Nb-microalloyed steel, while the corresponding values are 25.4 nm and 0.095%, respectively, in Ti-Nb-microalloyed steel. That is, the complex structure of TiN–NbC particles usually has a smaller size and more dispersed distribution in Ti-Nb-microalloyed steel than in Nb-microalloyed steel.

(3)

NbC particles may not be completely precipitated via a strain-induced precipitation mechanism, especially when the strain accumulation is not large enough, while Ti addition can effectively promote the precipitation of NbC particles.