Next Article in Journal
Design of In Situ Metal Matrix Composites Produced by Powder Metallurgy—A Critical Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanism of Layer Formation during Gas Nitriding of Remelted Ledeburitic Surface Layers on Unalloyed Cast Irons
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties of LPBF-Built Titanium Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study of As-Built and Hot Isostatic Pressed Structures for Medical Implants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Surface Residual Stress for Medium Carbon Steel Quenched by YAG Laser with Extended Cycloidal Motion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modification of the Surface of 40 Kh Steel by Electrolytic Plasma Hardening

1
Research Center “Surface Engineering and Tribology”, Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, Ust-Kamenogorsk 070000, Kazakhstan
2
Research Center “Material Surface Modification”, Shakarim University, Semey 071412, Kazakhstan
3
E.O. Paton Electric Welding Institute, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03650 Kyiv, Ukraine
4
Department of Thermal Physics and Technical Physics, Al Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
5
Department of Management and Entrepreneurship in Engineering, Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
6
PlasmaScience LLP, Ust-Kamenogorsk 070010, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(12), 2071; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122071
Submission received: 24 September 2022 / Revised: 23 November 2022 / Accepted: 26 November 2022 / Published: 2 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Metallic Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering)

Abstract

:
The high-strength, medium-carbon alloy construction steel 40 Kh is commonly used in the manufacture of tools and machine parts. This paper experimentally investigates the effect of electrolytic plasma thermocyclic hardening on the surface hardening and microstructure modification of 40 Kh steel. The research was carried out using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis and micro-hardness measurements. Modified samples were obtained at different electrolyte plasma thermal cycling modes. As a result of the heat treatment, hardened layer segments of different thicknesses and structural composition formed on the surface of the steel. The parameters and mechanisms of surface hardening were determined by examining the microstructural modification and phase transformation both before and after treatment. It was revealed that the main morphological structural-phase component of the initial state of 40 Kh steel was a ferrite–pearlite structure, and after electrolytic plasma thermocyclic hardening, the hardened martensite phase was formed. It was found that in order to achieve a hardening depth of 1.6 mm and an increase in hardness to 966 HV, the optimum time for electrolytic plasma treatment of 40 Kh steel was 2 s. The technology under discussion gives an insight into the surface hardening potential for improving the service life and reliability of 40 Kh steel.

1. Introduction

The surface finishing of machine parts and tools is carried out to extend the life and performance of metal components as, in most cases, the surface layers determine the quality level of the material [1,2]. The surface hardening of tools and machine parts is heated by radiation from process lasers, electron guns or high frequency currents [3,4,5,6,7]. However, the high cost of equipment and low efficiency in the use of material and energy resources limit the use of these technologies.
Traditionally, only the heating and cooling of steel has been the most common surface treatment method that has existed over time. Conventional heat treatment consists of heating the metal in a furnace and cooling in air, water or oil [8]. All of these processes require an expensive set-up and longer processing times, and some have cumbersome equipment [9]. Electrolytic plasma surface hardening (heating–hardening) is a new method that overcomes all these disadvantages [10]. This proves that it can successfully improve the desired physical and mechanical properties in much less time; in about a few seconds, compared to traditional heat treatment processes which require hours and days. Electrolytic plasma hardening (heating–hardening) is a special thermomechanical process which uses an electrolyte in an aqueous solution under certain conditions, e.g., voltage, current, electrolyte, duration and speed of heating–hardening [11,12]. In the heating–plasma hardening process, electrical energy is normally transferred from the metal anode to the workpiece itself through layers of electrolyte and plasma. The plasma layer is formed from the electrolyte material in the gap between the liquid electrode and the conductive surface of the workpiece. Electrolytic plasma hardening is a complex process that combines physical metallurgy and electrochemical processes, such as cathodic heating of the sample, where phase transformation and deformation occur simultaneously. Electrolytic plasma hardening of medium-carbon steels can alter their microstructure, causing changes in the mechanical and physical properties and affecting their behavior under operating conditions [13,14,15,16,17]. One of the important parameters determining the nature of phase change during electrolyte plasma heating is the periodic increase in temperature at which the metal is heated above the phase transition temperature α→γ. Subsequent rapid cooling captures the iron-based phases formed in the machined material layer as martensite, bainite and fine pearlite, respectively, and has industrially valuable material properties. The transition layer comprises: a fine-grained structure characteristic of the heat-affected zone and a coarse-grained structure characteristic of the substrate [18]. Our previous studies [19,20] have comparatively studied the effect of volume and surface heat treatments on the structural-phase states of medium carbon steel. Surface hardening was carried out by electrolyte plasma method. Volumetric hardening of the samples was carried out by heating to 900 °C with subsequent cooling in water and oil, and a part of the samples after hardening was annealed at 510 °C. It was found that electrolyte plasma surface hardening leads to an increase in microhardness up to two times due to the formation of fine needle martensite. This proves that the electrolyte plasma hardening method can be considered as an alternative to the traditional method of heating and cooling in the furnace.
Cathodic electrolytic plasma hardening allows a wide variation of the heating and cooling rates (50–500 °C/s) and produces a treated layer with a thickness of 0.1 to 10 mm [21]. The authors of [22] presented the results of electrolyte plasma thermal cyclic treatment of AISI 4140 steel. According to the results, the treatment process was carried out at cyclic voltages of 320 and 250 V with a time of 1, 2, 3, 4 s and 2, 3, 4, 5 s, respectively. It was determined that the hardened layer consisted of martensite phases, fine-dispersed pearlite and iron oxides. Depending on the conditions of electrolyte plasma thermocycling, the depth of the hardened layer was 6–8 mm and the corresponding microhardness was equal to 500–650 HV, which is 4–5 times higher than that of the matrix. Therefore, the results obtained by these authors also confirm that the electrolyte plasma thermocyclic treatment can change the structural-phase state, as well as improve the physical and mechanical properties that positively affect the service life of medium-carbon steels under operating conditions [23,24,25].
In addition, because plasma formation is instantaneous and takes place within a few seconds, it becomes difficult to stabilize the process input parameters to produce output parameters that suit our needs. Due to existing technical problems, this process is still under development [26,27]. To improve the structure of steels and their mechanical properties, we recommend the development of an electrolytic plasma thermocyclic hardening (EPTCH) mode based on the application of cyclic thermal influences.
In view of the above, the aim of the present work is to study the effect of an electrolytic plasma thermocyclic hardening mode on the structure and hardness of medium carbon steel.

2. Materials and Methods

Test specimens were made of 40 Kh steel of the following chemical composition: 0.36% C; 0.5% Mn; 0.2% Si; 0.8% Cr; 0.3% Ni; 0.3% Cu; 0.035% S; 0.035% P. Before experimenting with the steel surface, all 2 × 2 × 1 cm3 specimens were hand-sanded on abrasive paper with grit sizes ranging from P100 to P2000, polished on velvet and nylon cloths with 0.25–0.5 µm diamond paste and then cleaned with alcohol. EPTCH of steel was carried out in the cathode mode at the electrolyte-plasma treatment plant, the scheme of which is shown in Figure 1b. The power source was a powerful rectifier giving a maximum output of 360 V/100 A as a direct current [28,29]. A sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) solution was used as a heating and cooling source. The electrolyte composition was 85% distilled water and 15% sodium carbonate (weight %). The voltages (U, V) and treatment times (t, s) were different for each sample. The samples were hardened at 320 V, 250 V and 50 V sequences. Periodic changes in the electric field strength between the surfaces of the liquid electrode and the product were found to change the power density of surface heating, which provides control over the electrolyte plasma heating and ensures that the necessary thermal conditions are provided for the formation of hardening structures. The electrolytic plasma pulse values, treatment time and thermal cycling are shown in Table 1.
Experimental investigations were carried out on the basis of S.Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University in the research center “Surface engineering and tribology” (Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan). The phase composition of the samples was investigated by X’PertPro X-ray diffractometer (Philips, Almelo, the Netherlands) using CuKα radiation. Data processing and quantification were carried out using PowderCell 2.4 (Kraus W, Nolze G., 2000, PowderCell for Windows, version 2.4). The etching was carried out with a 4.0% nitric acid solution (HNO3) in alcohol for 10 s [26]. Optical micrographs were obtained with an Altami 5C microscope (Altami Ltd., Saint-Petersburg, Russia). The scanning electron microscope (SEM) (MIRA3 LMU, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) was used to study the structure at ×4000 and ×10,000. The chemical composition of the different phases of the microstructure was also studied using an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) connected to the SEM, using point scanning techniques. The microhardness of the samples was measured according to GOST 9450-76 (ASTM E384-11) on the microtesting device, Metolab 502 (Metolab, Saint-Petersburg, Russia), at loads on an indenter P = 1 N and exposure time of 10 s [30].
One of the main methods for experimental investigation of the mechanical properties of micro- and nanocomposite materials is the indentation method. Thus far, various types of continuous nanoindentation tests have been increasingly used in practice to measure the mechanical properties of materials, due to the high accuracy with which elastic characteristics are measured. The indentation method determines the hardness, Young’s modulus and elastic recovery of both superhard and soft materials using small loads. Nanoindentation analysis was carried out to evaluate the mechanical properties on a micro-scale of hardened 40 Kh steel samples. The modulus of elasticity is determined by the method of indentation on a complex measuring system according to the Oliver–Farr method [31]. It allows us to distinguish two components from the information contained in the unloading branch of the force–deformation diagram, which is related to both the elastic part of the achieved deformation and energy and the plastic one. The Young’s modulus E is determined by the measured elastic stiffness of the contact S = ∂P/∂h at the unloading stage from the following expression:
E r = π 2 S A ,
where Er = [(1 − νs2)/Es + (1 − νi2)/Ei] − 1 is the reduced Young’s module, taking into account the individual Young modules E and Poisson coefficients ν of the contacting bodies; the sample (with index s) and the indenter (with index i); and Ac is the contact area. Nanohardness H is defined as:
H = P max A
Nanoindentation tests were performed on a tester (Nanoscan 4D compact, Moscow, Russia) using a Berkovich indenter tip. The conducted peak load was 200 mN. The loading/unloading rate was 20 mN/s and was maintained at the maximum load for 10 s. The hardness and Young’s modulus were measured in accordance with GOST R 8.748-2011 (ISO 14577-1:2015) [32]. The tribological characteristics of steel were measured in the sliding friction mode according to the “ball-on-disk” scheme on an Anton Paar TRB3 tribometer (CSM Instruments, Bern, Switzerland). The sample rotation speed was 2 cm/s, the load was 6 N and a ball of Si3N4 (silicon nitride) with a diameter of 6 mm was used as a counterbody. The total sliding distance reached 60 m, which is enough for the wear testing of the hardened layer.

3. Results and Discussion

The microstructures prior to the electroplasma hardening of 40 Kh steel are shown in Figure 2a. As shown in the optical micrographs, the main phase component of the initial state of 40 Kh steel is ferrite (F-white part) and pearlite (P-dark part) [33,34]. After electrolytic plasma thermocyclic hardening, hardened martensite (M) structures formed on the steel surface, which are shown in Figure 2b–d.
Figure 3 shows the diffractograms of the original and hardened 40 Kh steel specimens which were evaluated by X-ray diffraction patterns using the software database, PowderCell 2.4. Diffractograms were taken from the active surface of the original and plasma hardened samples. The results show the presence of peaks corresponding to martensite. These results are in agreement with the microstructure study.
By periodically switching on a high voltage electrical potential of 320 V and a low voltage (pause) of 50, 250 V, the heating rate was increased and decreased, which then allowed more time and a thicker heated layer. During the demonstrated voltage mode, the pulse mode heated the samples, while the pause mode in the experiment either cooled the samples or maintained a constant temperature. The intermittent coupling of a high (320 V) and a low (pause 50, 250 V) electric potential results in a periodic increase and stabilizes or slows down the increase in heating rate, which then allows more time and a thicker heated layer without melting the surface [35,36]. As shown in Table 2, the electrolyte plasma treatment modes influenced the thickness of the hardened layer. The layer thickness was measured cross-sectionally using an optical microscope. The thickest layer (4.7 mm) was obtained in sample No. 3. For the remaining samples, the thickness of the hardened layer was approximately the same.
Figure 4 shows the Vickers micro-hardness of the samples in different states. In the initial state, 40 Kh steel had a microhardness of 245 HV, and after electroplasma hardening, the highest microhardness was at sample No. 2 which was 920 HV. The reason for the change in microhardness is the periodic increase in temperature at which the steel is heated above the phase transition temperature α→γ and the austenite to martensite is converted when cooling after the exposure. This transformation occurs in all hardened samples.
The nanoindentation method is widely used to measure the mechanical properties of materials at the microscale. Nanoindentation is a modern field for determining the hardness of materials, which is very useful in the field of mechanical engineering. A typical experimental curve for this method in the form of a graph of the dependence of the load (P) on the depth of indentation (h) is shown in Figure 5. The curve consists of two parts corresponding to the process of loading and unloading.
According to the data, EPTCH nanoindentation has a very strong effect on the hardness of 40 Kh steel. The EPTCH process transformed the martensitic phase. The formation of martensite led to an improvement in hardness compared to the original steel. These results show that EPTCH treatment contributes to the increase in the hardness of the samples due to the formation of the hardening phases, like martensite.
It is known from the wear theory that the structural state of steels also significantly affects the wear resistance [37]. As a rule, a martensitic structure demonstrates better wear resistance compared to a ferritic, pearlitic and bainitic structure [38]. To determine the tribological parameters of the surface, tribological tests for the sliding friction of the surfaces were carried out on a ball-on-disk scheme on an automated friction machine, Tribometer TRB3 [39]. The distribution graph of the sliding friction coefficient and the wear volume of 40 Kh steel at different thermal cycling modes are shown in Figure 6. It was found that the higher hardness of the EPTCH samples in the current experiment significantly limited the depth of deformation of the worn surface, which led to a significant decrease in friction coefficients. By comparing the values of the friction coefficient and wear volume of the original steel with a ferrite–pearlite structure with the hardened steel samples with a martensitic structure, it can be stated that hardness is certainly an important property of wear-resistant materials. Because the low hardness of the sample surface causes deeper penetration of abrasive particles, it therefore makes the micro-cutting process more efficient in addition to the more pronounced deformation of the material.
In connection with the above generalized results of the EPTCH of 40 Kh steel under different thermal cycling modes, it was customary to consider sample No. 2 as the optimal mode, which has an improved structural-phase and mechanical characteristics in many respects. Figure 7 shows a cross-section of specimen No. 2 consisting of three zones comprising the base metal, the heat-affected zone and the hardening zone. The results of the 40 Kh microstructure in the hardening zone consist mainly of martensite, while bainite and highly dispersed pearlite are formed in the transition zone. After electrolytic plasma hardening (heating–hardening), the microstructure changes according to the Fe-C diagram of state [40,41]. Layers are formed in which the structural constituents are present according to the carbon content of the steel when quenched from temperatures above AC1 and cooled below it, with transition zones between the layers and with structural constituents of adjacent areas.
To experimentally verify these claims, special investigations were carried out to determine the chemical composition of steel using an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) connected to an SEM, using point scanning techniques [42,43]. SEM micrographs and the corresponding EDS spectra of the steel samples are illustrated in Figure 8. The EDS results verify the formation of the α’ phase by indicating 0.7 wt% C in this phase as illustrated in Figure 8a. The chemical analysis data for the depth of electroplasma hardening and the unstrengthened zone, presented in Table 3, confirm the chemical microheterogeneity of the structural and phase components of the investigated steel.
Figure 9 shows the microhardness values along the depth of the steel. The hardness of the hardened layer is within 950 HV. The high heating and cooling rates ensure that hardening structures with a smooth transition to the base metal are formed (Figure 7). The thickness of the transition layer is 0.5–0.6 mm. At a depth of 1.1 mm, a martensitic structure with microhardness 971–864 HV is observed, at a depth of 1.2–1.6 mm, a highly dispersed pearlitic–bainitic structure with microhardness 685–445 HV is observed, followed by a base metal structure with a typical ferrite–pearlite structure with microhardness 260–263 HV. The creation of a system of hard inclusions on the surface of products provides multiple increases in wear resistance and compressive stresses in the surface layer of the product, which increase its strength [44,45].

4. Conclusions

Electrolytic plasma hardening (heating–hardening) of the surface of 40 Kh steel produces positive results with a carbon content of more than 0.3% and sufficient alloying elements to produce solid phases. The intermittent coupling of a high (320 V) and low (pause 50, 250 V) electric potential leads to a periodic increase and stabilizes or delays the heating rate increase, resulting in a significant increase in hardening depth (1.1–4.7 mm) and an increase in maximum hardness in microvolumes to 770–965 HV in the 40 Kh steel surface layer. The results show that electrolytic plasma hardening (heating–hardening) has a high potential in controlling major structural changes in the surface layer of steel in the formation of physical and mechanical properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.T. and S.A.; methodology, D.B. and Y.T.; investigation, L.Z., A.K. and Z.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.K.; visualization, L.Z. and Y.T.; writing—review and editing, L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP08857733).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Belkin, P.N.; Kusmanov, S.A. Plasma electrolytic hardening of steels: Review. Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. 2016, 52, 531–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rakhadilov, B.K.; Buranich, V.V.; Satbayeva, Z.A.; Sagdoldina, Z.B.; Kozhanova, R.S.; Pogrebnjak, A.D. The cathodic electrolytic plasma hardening of the 20Cr2Ni4A chromium-nickel steel. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 6969–6976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pantelis, D.I.; Bouyiouri, E.; Kouloumbi, N.; Vassiliou, P.; Koutsomichalis, A. Wear and corrosion resistance of laser surface hardened structural steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2002, 161, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kulka, M.; Pertek, A. Laser surface modification of carburized and borocarburized 15CrNi6 steel. Mater. Charact. 2007, 58, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Skeeba, V.Y.; Ivancivsky, V.V.; Martyushev, N.V. Peculiarities of High-Energy Induction Heating during Surface Hardening in Hybrid Processing Conditions. Metals 2021, 11, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mazhyn, S.; Laila, Z.; Michael, S. Influence of regimes electrolytic-plasma processing on phase structure and hardening of steel 30CrMnSi. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 601, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ramanathan, T.; Sekar, K.; Shanmugam, N. Microstructural evaluation and effect of heat generation in FSW of AA1100. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2022, 49, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hurtado-Delgado, E.; Huerta-Larumbe, L.; Miranda-Pérez, A.; Aguirre-Sánchez, Á. Microcracks reduction in laser hardened layers of ductile iron. Coatings 2021, 11, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rakhadilov, B.K.; Miniyazov, A.Z.; Skakov, M.K.; Sagdoldina, Z.B.; Tulenbergenov, T.R.; Sapataev, E.E. Structural modification and erosion of plasma-irradiated tungsten and molybdenum surfaces. Tech. Phys. 2020, 65, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dudkina, N.G.; Arisova, V.N. Surface layer of 40Kh steel after electromechanical treatment with dynamic force impact. Izv. Ferr. Metall. 2021, 64, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, X. Effect of fast cooling on mechanical properties of continuous annealed cold rolled ultra high strength steel. Cailiao Rechuli Xuebao/Trans. Mater. Heat Treat. 2006, 27, 49–52. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rakhadilov, B.K.; Kozhanova, R.S.; Baizhan, D.; Zhurerova, L.G.; Yerbolatova, G.U.; Kalitova, A.A.; Zhanuzakova, L.N. Influence of plasma electrolytic hardening modes on the structure and properties of 65G steel. Eurasian J. Phys. Funct. Mater. 2021, 5, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhurerova, L.G.; Rakhadilov, B.K.; Popova, N.A.; Kylyshkanov, M.K.; Buranich, V.V.; Pogrebnjak, A.D. Effect of the PEN/C surface layer modification on the microstructure, mechanical and tribological properties of the 30CrMnSiA mild-carbon steel. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ayday, A.; Durman, M. Effect of different surface-heat-treatment methods on the surface properties of AISI 4140 steel. Mater. Tehnol. 2014, 48, 787–790. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rakhadilov, B.; Seitkhanova, A.; Satbayeva, Z.; Yerbolatova, G.; Icheva, Y.; Sagdoldina, Z. Investigation of the structural, mechanical and tribological properties of plasma electrolytic hardened chromium-nickel steel. Lubricants 2021, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aravindkumar, D.; Thirumalai, R. Investigations on microstructural characteristics and mechanical properties of 316 L stainless steel welded joints using nickel coated filler material by gas tungsten arc welding. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 046513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumruoğlu, L.C.; Özel, A. Surface Modification of AISI 4140 Steel Using Electrolytic Plasma Thermocyclic Treatment. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2010, 25, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tabiyeva, Y.Y.; Rakhadilov, B.K.; Uazyrkhanova, G.K.; Zhurerova, L.G.; Maulit, A.; Baizhan, D. Surface modification of steel mark 2 electrolytic-plasma exposure. Eurasian J. Phys. Funct. Mater. 2019, 3, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rakhadilov, B.K.; Kozhanova, R.S.; Kowalewski, P.; Baizhan, D.R.; Sagdoldina, Z.B.; Zhurerova, L.G.; Yerbolatova, G.U. Impact of Volume and Surface Heat Treatment on the Structure and Properties of Steel 30HGSA. Bull. Univ. Karaganda-Phys. 2021, 4, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rahadilov, B.K.; Zhurerova, L.G.; Sagdoldina, Z.B.; Kenesbekov, A.B.; Bayatanova, L.B. Morphological changes in the dislocation structure of structural steel 20GL after electrolytic-plasma hardening of the surface. J. Surf. Investig. 2021, 15, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rakhadilov, B.K.; Satbayeva, Z.A.; Wieleba, W.; Kylyshkanov, M.K.; Baizhan, D.R. Changes in structure and properties of structural chromonickel steels after plasma electrolyte hardening. News Natl. Acad. Sci. Repub. Kazakhstan 2021, 4, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sagdoldina, Z.; Rakhadilov, B.; Kurbanbekov, S.; Kozhanova, R.; Kengesbekov, A. Effect of Irradiation with Si+ Ions on Phase Transformations in Ti–Al System during Thermal Annealing. Coatings 2021, 11, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bayati, M.R.; Molaei, R.; Janghorban, K. Surface alloying of carbon steels from electrolytic plasma. Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 2011, 53, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rakhadilov, B.; Kengesbekov, A.; Zhurerova, L.; Kozhanova, R.; Sagdoldina, Z. Impact of Electronic Radiation on the Morphology of the Fine Structure of the Surface Layer of R6M5 Steel. Machines 2021, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ayday, A.; Kırsever, D.; Demirkıran, A.Ş. The effects of overlapping in electrolytic plasma hardening on wear behavior of carbon steel. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2022, 75, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dayança, A.; Karaca, B.; Kumruoǧlu, L.C. The cathodic electrolytic plasma hardening of steel and cast iron based automotive camshafts. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2017, 131, 374–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rakhadilov, B.K.; Tabiyeva, Y.Y.; Uazyrkhanova, G.K.; Zhurerova, L.G.; Baizhan, D. Influence of electrolytic-plasma surface quenching on the structure and strength properties of ferritic-pearlite class wheel steel. Eurasian J. Phys. Funct. Mater. 2020, 4, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rakhadilov, B.; Baizhan, D. Creation of bioceramic coatings on the surface of Ti–6Al–4V alloy by plasma electrolytic oxidation followed by gas detonation spraying. Coatings 2021, 11, 1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rakhadilov, B.; Satbayeva, Z.; Baizhan, D. Effect of electrolytic-plasma surface strengthening on the structure and properties of steel 40KhN. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, METAL, Brno, Czech Republic, 22–24 May 2019; pp. 950–955. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rakhadilov, B.K.; Baizhan, D.R.; Sagdoldina, Z.B.; Buitkenov, D.B.; Maulet, M. Phase composition and structure of composite Ti/HA coatings synthesized by detonation spraying. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2297, 020022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oliver, W.; Pharr, G. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 1992, 7, 1564–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. ArslanHafeez, M.; Usman, M.; Arshad, M.A.; AdeelUmer, M. Nanoindentation-Based Micro-Mechanical and Electrochemical Properties of Quench-Hardened, Tempered Low-Carbon Steel. Crystals 2020, 10, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kusmanov, S.A.; Silkin, S.A.; Smirnov, A.A.; Belkin, P.N. Possibilities of increasing wear resistance of steel surface by plasma electrolytic treatment. Wear 2017, 386–387, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kozlov, E.; Popova, N.; Zhurerova, L.; Nikonenko, E.; Kalashnikov, M.; Skakov, M. Structural and phase transformations in 0.3C-1Cr-1Mn-1Si-fe steel after electrolytic plasma treatment. Pap. Present. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1783, 020112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Popova, N.A.; Zhurerova, L.G.; Nikonenko, E.L.; Skakov, M.K. Effect of plasma electrolytic nitrocarburizing on phase composition of 0.3C-1Mn-1Si-fe steel. Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 2017, 8, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhang, T. Nanoindentation-Induced Pile-Up in the Residual Impression of Crystalline Cu with Different Grain Size. Crystals 2018, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Li, J.; Cao, Z.; Liu, L.; Liu, X.; Peng, J. Effect of microstructure on hardness and wear properties of 45 steel after induction hardening. Steel Res. Int. 2021, 92, 2000540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wen, E.; Song, R.; Xiong, W. Effect of Tempering Temperature on Microstructures and Wear Behavior of a 500 HB Grade Wear-Resistant Steel. Metals 2019, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Baizhan, D.; Rakhadilov, B.; Zhurerova, L.; Tyurin, Y.; Sagdoldina, Z.; Adilkanova, M.; Kozhanova, R. Investigation of Changes in the Structural-Phase State and the Efficiency of Hardening of 30CrMnSiA Steel by the Method of Electrolytic Plasma Thermocyclic Surface Treatment. Coatings 2022, 12, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumruoglu, L.C.; Becerik, D.A.; Ozel, A.; Mimaroglu, A. Surface modification of medium carbon steel by using electrolytic plasma thermocyclic treatment. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2009, 24, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rakhadilov, B.; Skakov, M.; Miniyzov, A.; Kenesbekov, A. Hydrogen and deuterium storage in tungsten when irradiation with plasma beam. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, METAL, Brno, Czech Republic, 23–25 May 2018; pp. 1216–1221. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rakhadilov, B.; Satbayeva, Z.; Ramankulov, S.; Shektibayev, N.; Zhurerova, L.; Popova, N.; Uazyrkhanova, G.; Sagdoldina, Z. Change of 0.34Cr-1Ni-Mo-Fe steel dislocation structure in plasma electrolyte hardening. Materials 2021, 14, 1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rakhadilov, B.K.; Stepanova, O.A.; Sagdoldina, Z.B.; Satbayeva, Z.A. Method for Hardening Steel Products. KZ Utility Model Patent No. 4891; Application No. 18.09.2018, 28 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rahadilov, B.K.; Skakov, M.K.; Tulenbergenov, T.R. Tungsten surface erosion by hydrogen plasma irradiation. Key Eng. Mater. 2017, 736, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mazhyn, S.; Bauyrzhan, R.; Erlan, B.; Michael, S. Change of structure and mechanical properties of R6M5 steel surface layer at electrolytic-plasma nitriding. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 1040, 753–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Electrolyte plasma sample treatment process; (b) functional diagram: 1—workpiece; 2—cone-shaped stainless steel electrolytic cell; 3—sump; 4—pump; 5—heat exchanger; 6—electrolyte bath.
Figure 1. (a) Electrolyte plasma sample treatment process; (b) functional diagram: 1—workpiece; 2—cone-shaped stainless steel electrolytic cell; 3—sump; 4—pump; 5—heat exchanger; 6—electrolyte bath.
Metals 12 02071 g001
Figure 2. Optical micrographs of 40 Kh steel: (a) initial, (b) No. 1, (c) No. 2 and (d) No. 3.
Figure 2. Optical micrographs of 40 Kh steel: (a) initial, (b) No. 1, (c) No. 2 and (d) No. 3.
Metals 12 02071 g002
Figure 3. Diffractograms of 40 Kh steel: (a) initial, (b) No. 1, (c) No. 2 and (d) No. 3.
Figure 3. Diffractograms of 40 Kh steel: (a) initial, (b) No. 1, (c) No. 2 and (d) No. 3.
Metals 12 02071 g003
Figure 4. Vickers micro-hardness of the samples in different states.
Figure 4. Vickers micro-hardness of the samples in different states.
Metals 12 02071 g004
Figure 5. Load–displacement curves for steel 40 Kh before and after EPTCH.
Figure 5. Load–displacement curves for steel 40 Kh before and after EPTCH.
Metals 12 02071 g005
Figure 6. Distribution graph of (a) coefficient of sliding friction and (b) wear volume of 40 Kh steel.
Figure 6. Distribution graph of (a) coefficient of sliding friction and (b) wear volume of 40 Kh steel.
Metals 12 02071 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of the cross-section of sample No. 2. (a) hardened layer at ×4000 and (b) ×10,000, (c) micrography at ×50, (d) heat affected zone at ×4000, (e) unaffected material at ×1000 and (f) ×5000.
Figure 7. SEM images of the cross-section of sample No. 2. (a) hardened layer at ×4000 and (b) ×10,000, (c) micrography at ×50, (d) heat affected zone at ×4000, (e) unaffected material at ×1000 and (f) ×5000.
Metals 12 02071 g007
Figure 8. Schematic graph of EDS testing zones: (a) hardened layer, (b) heat affected zone and (c) unaffected material.
Figure 8. Schematic graph of EDS testing zones: (a) hardened layer, (b) heat affected zone and (c) unaffected material.
Metals 12 02071 g008
Figure 9. Depth distribution of microhardness in sample No. 2 after EPTCH.
Figure 9. Depth distribution of microhardness in sample No. 2 after EPTCH.
Metals 12 02071 g009
Table 1. Technological parameters of electrolytic plasma thermal cycling treatment modes for 40 Kh steel.
Table 1. Technological parameters of electrolytic plasma thermal cycling treatment modes for 40 Kh steel.
Cycle1234567
SampleU1, Vt1, sU2, Vt2, sU3, Vt3, sU4, Vt4, sU5, Vt5, sU6, Vt6, sU7, Vt7, s
No. 132015073201--------
No. 23202------------
No. 332012503505320125025053201
Table 2. The influence of EPTCH modes on the formation of the thickness of the hardened layer.
Table 2. The influence of EPTCH modes on the formation of the thickness of the hardened layer.
ModeCycleThickness of the Hardened Layer, mm
No. 131.1
No. 211.6
No. 374.7
Table 3. EDS analysis results.
Table 3. EDS analysis results.
SpectrumFe (Weight %)Cr (Weight %)Mn (Weight %)Si (Weight %)C (Weight %)
Spectrum 197.41.00.60.30.7
Spectrum 297.41.00.60.40.7
Spectrum 397.30.90.80.30.6
Spectrum 497.31.10.70.20.7
Spectrum 597.70.90.70.30.4
Spectrum 697.61.00.60.30.5
Spectrum 797.51.10.60.30.4
Spectrum 897.71.00.70.30.3
Spectrum 997.80.90.70.30.3
Spectrum 1097.51.10.80.30.3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sagdoldina, Z.; Zhurerova, L.; Tyurin, Y.; Baizhan, D.; Kuykabayeba, A.; Abildinova, S.; Kozhanova, R. Modification of the Surface of 40 Kh Steel by Electrolytic Plasma Hardening. Metals 2022, 12, 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122071

AMA Style

Sagdoldina Z, Zhurerova L, Tyurin Y, Baizhan D, Kuykabayeba A, Abildinova S, Kozhanova R. Modification of the Surface of 40 Kh Steel by Electrolytic Plasma Hardening. Metals. 2022; 12(12):2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sagdoldina, Zhuldyz, Laila Zhurerova, Yuri Tyurin, Daryn Baizhan, Aizhan Kuykabayeba, Saule Abildinova, and Rauan Kozhanova. 2022. "Modification of the Surface of 40 Kh Steel by Electrolytic Plasma Hardening" Metals 12, no. 12: 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122071

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop