Next Article in Journal
The “Youthquake” in British Politics: Myth or Reality?
Next Article in Special Issue
Disabled Families: The Impacts of Disability and Care on Family Labour and Poverty in Rural Guatemala
Previous Article in Journal
The Vulnerable Subject
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of How House Ownership Shapes Health Outcomes in Urban Ghana
Open AccessConcept Paper

Disabilities and Livelihoods: Rethinking a Conceptual Framework

1
Live Work Well Research Centre and Department of Political Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
2
Department of Political Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Societies 2019, 9(4), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc9040067
Received: 2 July 2019 / Revised: 16 September 2019 / Accepted: 18 September 2019 / Published: 26 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Families, Work and Well-being)
Livelihoods, or the means to secure the necessities of life, shape how we live as individuals, families and communities, and our sense of well-being. While discussions of livelihoods have influenced academic discussions and government actions in international development over the past 25 years, few have discussed the implications of a livelihoods approach for people with disabilities in the context of global Northern societies. This paper argues that by using a livelihoods approach, we can recognize the multiple and, at times, conflicting ways that people with disabilities sustain themselves and secure the necessities of life. A livelihoods approach recognizes the agency of individuals, including those with disabilities, in the context of their relationships in households, families and communities, while also identifying the systemic barriers, inequalities and opportunities that shape livelihood choices. Using this approach, we argue, will enable a better understanding of how people with disabilities both survive and thrive, the diverse livelihood choices they make and the implications these choices have for policy decisions. View Full-Text
Keywords: livelihoods; disabilities; work; labour; right to work; right to not work; global Northern societies livelihoods; disabilities; work; labour; right to work; right to not work; global Northern societies
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Stienstra, D.; Lee, T.M.L. Disabilities and Livelihoods: Rethinking a Conceptual Framework. Societies 2019, 9, 67.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop