Interventions to Promote Positive Affect and Physical Activity in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults—A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Eligibility Criteria
2.2. Search
- Physical activity-related terms: “physical activity” OR exercise OR sport*
- Emotion-related terms: emotion* OR affect* OR feel* OR enjoy* OR fun OR liking OR pleasure OR “physical activity enjoyment scale” OR PACES
- Study design: intervention OR “controlled trial”
- Mental disease-related terms: NOT (depress* OR schizophren* OR dementia* OR alzheimer* OR addict*)
2.3. Study Selection
2.4. Data Extraction
2.5. Quality Assessment
3. Results
3.1. Study Characteristics
3.2. Study Quality
3.3. Content of Interventions
3.3.1. Group-Based PA Programs
3.3.2. Multi-Component School Programs
3.3.3. Internet-Based Programs
3.3.4. Audio- and Video-Based Exergaming Programs
4. Discussion
4.1. Theoretical Foundation of Interventions
4.2. Intervention Components—Reviewing the Evidence
4.3. Methodical Limitations of Included Studies
4.4. Guidelines for Affect-Based Interventions
- SDT is the most established theory, but new, more affect-oriented theories should be integrated into interventions to test and develop new approaches.
- Evidence points to effective components, especially task-oriented teaching styles and creating opportunities for voluntary PA. Still, high-quality studies are needed to further solidify the evidence. To what extent text messages, the use of social media, pedometers or exergames promote PA enjoyment should be investigated in further studies.
- Adequate sample sizes for randomized, controlled interventions with controlled confounders increase the validity of studies. Further, the use of established measurement methods and mediator analyses improve the study quality and build a foundation for convincing evidence to be summarized and reviewed in meta-analyses.
4.5. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Reiner, M.; Niermann, C.; Jekauc, D.; Woll, A. Long-term health benefits of physical activity--a systematic review of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health; WHO: Genève, Switzerland, 2010; ISBN 9789241599979. [Google Scholar]
- Hallal, P.C.; Andersen, L.B.; Bull, F.C.; Guthold, R.; Haskell, W.; Ekelund, U. Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012, 380, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finger, J.D.; Varnaccia, G.; Borrmann, A.; Lange, C.; Mensink, G.B.M. Körperliche Aktivität von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland – Querschnittergebnisse aus KiGGS Welle 2 und Trends. J. Health Monit. 2018, 1, 24–31. [Google Scholar]
- Janssen, I.; Leblanc, A.G. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010, 7, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eime, R.M.; Young, J.A.; Harvey, J.T.; Charity, M.J.; Payne, W.R. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: Informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2013, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sallis, J.F.; Cervero, R.B.; Ascher, W.; Henderson, K.A.; Kraft, M.K.; Kerr, J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2006, 27, 297–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Golden, S.D.; Earp, J.A.L. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: Twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educ. Behav. 2012, 39, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, S.F.; Perkins, F.; Khandor, E.; Cordwell, L.; Hamann, S.; Buasai, S. Integrated health promotion strategies: A contribution to tackling current and future health challenges. Health Promot. Int. 2006, 21 (Suppl. 1), 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plotnikoff, R.C.; Costigan, S.A.; Williams, R.L.; Hutchesson, M.J.; Kennedy, S.G.; Robards, S.L.; Allen, J.; Collins, C.E.; Callister, R.; Germov, J. Effectiveness of interventions targeting physical activity, nutrition and healthy weight for university and college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2015, 12, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rhodes, R.E.; Dickau, L. Experimental evidence for the intention-behavior relationship in the physical activity domain: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2012, 31, 724–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slovic, P.; Finucane, M.L.; Peters, E.; MacGregor, D.G. The affect heuristic. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 177, 1333–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benthin, A.; Slovic, P.; Moran, P.; Severson, H.; Mertz, C.K.; Gerrard, M. Adolescent Health-Threatening and Health-Enhancing Behaviors: A Study of Word Association and Imagery. J. Adolesc. Health 1995, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jekauc, D.; Brand, R. Editorial: How do Emotions and Feelings Regulate Physical Activity? Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ekman, P. An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 1992, 6, 169–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, J.A. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol. Rev. 2003, 110, 145–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brand, R.; Ekkekakis, P. Affective Reflective Theory of physical inactivity and exercise. Ger. J. Exerc. Sport Res. 2018, 48, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Evans, J.S.B.T.; Stanovich, K.E. Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 8, 223–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-Determination Theory. Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-1462528769. [Google Scholar]
- Gråstén, A.; Jaakkola, T.; Liukkonen, J.; Watt, A.; Yli-Piipari, S. Prediction of enjoyment in school physical education. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2012, 11, 260–269. [Google Scholar]
- Gråstén, A.; Watt, A. A Motivational Model of Physical Education and Links to Enjoyment, Knowledge, Performance, Total Physical Activity and Body Mass Index. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2017, 16, 318–327. [Google Scholar]
- White, R.L.; Olson, R.; Parker, P.D.; Astell-Burt, T.; Lonsdale, C. A qualitative investigation of the perceived influence of adolescents’ motivation on relationships between domain-specific physical activity and positive and negative affect. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2018, 14, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fairclough, S. Physical Activity, Perceived Competence and Enjoyment During High School Physical Education. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2003, 8, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cox, A.; Duncheon, N.; McDavid, L. Peers and Teachers as Sources of Relatedness Perceptions, Motivation, and Affective Responses in Physical Education. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2009, 80, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leisterer, S.; Jekauc, D. Students’ Emotional Experience in Physical Education- A Qualitative Study for New Theoretical Insights. Sports (Basel) 2019, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Leisterer, S.; Jekauc, D. Kompetenzerleben und Zugehörigkeit als Determinanten des Affekts im Sportunterricht. Zwei experimentelle Studien. Z. für Sportpädagogische Forsch. 2019, 7, 5–30. [Google Scholar]
- Kwan, B.M.; Bryan, A.D. Affective response to exercise as a component of exercise motivation: Attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, and temporal stability of intentions. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2010, 11, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, T.; Solmon, M. Integrating self-determination theory with the social ecological model to understand students’ physical activity behaviors. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2013, 6, 54–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, D.M.; Evans, D.R. Current Emotion Research in Health Behavior Science. Emot. Rev. 2014, 6, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhodes, R.E.; Kates, A. Can the Affective Response to Exercise Predict Future Motives and Physical Activity Behavior? A Systematic Review of Published Evidence. Ann. Behav. Med. 2015, 49, 715–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasuti, G.; Rhodes, R.E. Affective judgment and physical activity in youth: Review and meta-analyses. Ann. Behav. Med. 2013, 45, 357–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhodes, R.E.; Fiala, B.; Conner, M. A review and meta-analysis of affective judgments and physical activity in adult populations. Ann. Behav. Med. 2009, 38, 180–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burns, R.D.; Fu, Y.; Podlog, L.W. School-based physical activity interventions and physical activity enjoyment: A Meta-analysis. Prev. Med. 2017, 103, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Biddle, S.J.H. Research synthesis in sport and exercise psychology: Chaos in the brickyard revisited. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2006, 6, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caspersen, C.J.; Powell, K.E.; Christenson, G.M. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985, 100, 126–131. [Google Scholar]
- The Effective Public Health Practice Project. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Available online: https://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-repositories/search/14 (accessed on 27 June 2019).
- Fu, Y.; Burns, R.D.; Constantino, N.; Zhang, P. Differences in Step Counts, Motor Competence, and Enjoyment between an Exergaming Group and a Non-Exergaming Group. Games Health J. 2018, 7, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- George, A.M.; Rohr, L.E.; Byrne, J. Impact of Nintendo Wii Games on Physical Literacy in Children: Motor Skills, Physical Fitness, Activity Behaviors, and Knowledge. Sports (Basel) 2016, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huberty, J.L.; Dinkel, D.M.; Beets, M.W. Evaluation of GoGirlGo!; A practitioner based program to improve physical activity. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Quartiroli, A.; Maeda, H. The Effects of a Lifetime Physical Fitness (LPF) Course on College Students’ Health Behaviors. Int. J. Exerc. Sci. 2016, 9, 136–148. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, W.M.; Berry, D.; Hu, J. A church-based intervention to change attitudes about physical activity among Black adolescent girls: A feasibility study. Public Health Nurs. 2013, 30, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Robbins, L.B.; Wen, F.; Ling, J. Mediators of Physical Activity Behavior Change in the “Girls on the Move” Intervention. Nurs. Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fairclough, S.J.; McGrane, B.; Sanders, G.; Taylor, S.; Owen, M.; Curry, W. A non-equivalent group pilot trial of a school-based physical activity and fitness intervention for 10-11 year old english children: Born to move. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murillo Pardo, B.; García Bengoechea, E.; Julián Clemente, J.A.; Generelo Lanaspa, E. Motivational outcomes and predictors of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time for adolescents in the sigue la huella intervention. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2016, 23, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miragall, M.; Domínguez-Rodríguez, A.; Navarro, J.; Cebolla, A.; Baños, R.M. Increasing physical activity through an internet-based motivational intervention supported by pedometers in a sample of sedentary students: A randomised controlled trial. Psychol. Health 2018, 33, 465–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gråstén, A.; Yli-Piipari, S. The Patterns of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Physical Education Enjoyment Through a 2-Year School-Based Program. J. Sch. Health 2019, 89, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Invernizzi, P.L.; Crotti, M.; Bosio, A.; Cavaggioni, L.; Alberti, G.; Scurati, R. Multi-Teaching Styles Approach and Active Reflection: Effectiveness in Improving Fitness Level, Motor Competence, Enjoyment, Amount of Physical Activity, and Effects on the Perception of Physical Education Lessons in Primary School Children. Sustainability 2019, 11, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.C.K.; Kee, Y.H.; Leng, H.K. Use of Facebook in physical activity intervention programme A test of selfdetermination theory. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 2015, 46, 210–224. [Google Scholar]
- Direito, A.; Jiang, Y.; Whittaker, R.; Maddison, R. Apps for IMproving FITness and Increasing Physical Activity Among Young People: The AIMFIT Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2015, 17, e210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bartholomew Eldredge, L.K.; Markham, C.M.; Ruiter, R.A.C.; Fernández, M.E.; Kok, G.; Parcel, G.S. Planning Health Promotion Programs. An Intervention Mapping Approach, 4th ed.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-119-03549-7. [Google Scholar]
- Fenton, S.A.M.; Duda, J.L.; Appleton, P.R.; Barrett, T.G. Empowering youth sport environments: Implications for daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and adiposity. J. Sport Health Sci. 2017, 6, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Murcia, J.A.M.; Román, M.L.d.S.; Galindo, C.M.; Alonso, N.; González-Cutre, D. Peers’ influence on exercise enjoyment: A self-determination theory approach. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2008, 7, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Leptokaridou, E.T.; Vlachapoulos, S.P.; Papaioannou, A.G. Associations of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness with Enjoyment and Effort in Elementary School Physical Education: The Mediating Role of Self- Determined Motivation. Hell. J. Psychol. 2015, 12, 105–128. [Google Scholar]
- Michael, S.L.; Coffield, E.; Lee, S.M.; Fulton, J.E. Variety, enjoyment, and physical activity participation among high school students. J. Phys. Act. Health 2016, 13, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ntoumanis, N. A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2001, 71, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sirriyeh, R.; Lawton, R.; Ward, J. Physical activity and adolescents: An exploratory randomized controlled trial investigating the influence of affective and instrumental text messages. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2010, 15, 825–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quelly, S.B.; Norris, A.E.; DiPietro, J.L. Impact of mobile apps to combat obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. J. Spec. Pediatr. Nurs. 2016, 21, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lau, P.W.C.; Lau, E.Y.; Wong, D.P.; Ransdell, L. A systematic review of information and communication technology-based interventions for promoting physical activity behavior change in children and adolescents. J. Med. Internet Res. 2011, 13, e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ridgers, N.D.; Timperio, A.; Brown, H.; Ball, K.; Macfarlane, S.; Lai, S.K.; Richards, K.; Ngan, W.; Salmon, J. A cluster-randomised controlled trial to promote physical activity in adolescents: The Raising Awareness of Physical Activity (RAW-PA) Study. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mendoza, J.A.; Baker, K.S.; Moreno, M.A.; Whitlock, K.; Abbey-Lambertz, M.; Waite, A.; Colburn, T.; Chow, E.J. A Fitbit and Facebook mHealth intervention for promoting physical activity among adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors: A pilot study. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2017, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubans, D.R.; Morgan, P.J.; Tudor-Locke, C. A systematic review of studies using pedometers to promote physical activity among youth. Prev. Med. 2009, 48, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellecker, R.; Lyons, E.J.; Baranowski, T. Disentangling Fun and Enjoyment in Exergames Using an Expanded Design, Play, Experience Framework: A Narrative Review. Games Health J. 2013, 2, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sun, H. Exergaming Impact on Physical Activity and Interest in Elementary School Children. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2012, 83, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristics | Samples N (%) |
---|---|
Study design Randomized controlled trials Controlled trials Cohort | 5 (39) 4 (31) 4 (31) |
Gender Only female Mixed | 3 (23) 10 (77) |
Age groups 4–13 years 14–17 years 18–23 years | 8 (62) 2 (15) 3 (23) |
Intervention setting School University Church community Not specified | 8 (62) 3 (23) 1 (8) 1 (8) |
Theory SDT Trans-Theoretical Model SDT + Health Promotion Model SDT + Social Ecological Model SDT + Theory of Planned Behavior Achievement Goal Theory + Social Ecological Model None | 1 (8) 1 (8) 1 (8) 1 (8) 1 (8) 1 (8) 7 (54) |
Measurements of enjoyment (self-reported) PACES/sPACES Enjoyment subscale of IMI PE enjoyment scale PA enjoyment scale Enjoyment subscale of MPAM-R PACES + Enjoyment subscale of IMI | 6 (46) 3 (23) 1 (8) 1 (8) 1 (8) 1 (8) |
Measurements of PA Accelerometer Pedometer Questionnaire Questionnaire + accelerometer | 4 (31) 3 (23) 5 (39) 1 (8) |
Source (Author, Year, Country of Origin) | Study Design (Theory, Measurement Points, Statistics) | Sample (Setting, Sample Size, Mean Age) | Intervention (Length of Intervention, Treatment, Duration, Frequency) | Outcome (Measurements of Affect and PA) | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direito et al., 2015 [50], New Zealand | RCT baseline, post-test (8 weeks) ANCOVA | adolescents n = 51 (57% female) M = 15.7 ± 1.2 years | 8 weeks (1) immersive running app (n = 17), 3x/week (2) non-immersive running app (n = 16), 3x/week (3) control: sport as usual (n = 18) | enjoyment: PACES PA: PAQ-A, accelerometer (for following 7 days after each assessment point) | enjoyment (n.s.) PA (n.s.) |
Fairclough et al., 2016 [44], Ireland | CT baseline, mid- (3 weeks), post-test (6 weeks) Oct. 2015–Dec. 2015 ANOVA, ANCOVA | 4 co-educational primary schools n = 139 M = 10.7 ± 0.6 years | 6 weeks (1) Born to Move (n = 73): class-based PA program with music, 8 movement categories for motor skills 2x/week (30 min) and regular PE lesson 1x/week (30–45 min) (2) control (n = 66) regular PE lessons 2x/week (30–45 minutes) | enjoyment: short-form IMI (baseline, mid-test) PA: LPA, MPA, MVPA, VPA, total PAsedentary time: accelerometers | group x time interaction for enjoyment in (1) (p = 0.049) increased enjoyment in (1) at mid-test (d = 0.56, p = 0.02) increased LPA (d =0.21, p = 0.006), MPA (d = 0.15, p = 0.026), MVPA (d = 0.14, p = 0.044), total PA (d = 0.18, p = 0.033) in (1) VPA (n.s.) decreased sedentary activity (d = 0.39, p = 0.008) |
Fu et al., 2018 [38], USA | RCT post-test (12 weeks) MANOVA | preschool n = 64 (48% female) M = 4.9 ± 0.7 years | 12 weeks (1) Exergames (n = 35) 15 min “GoNoodle”, 10 min “Adventure to Fitness”, 5 min “Cosmic Kids Yoga” (2) control (n = 29): active free play 5x/week (30 min) | enjoyment: subscale of IMI PA: pedometer | enjoyment (n.s.) PA higher in (1) at post-test than in (2) (d = 0.68, p = 0.003) |
George et al., 2015 [39], Canada | Cohort Pre- and post-test (6 weeks) t-tests, regression analysis, rANOVA | after school program n = 15 (53% female) M = 7.9 ± 2.12 | 6 weeks (1) 4 active video games from the Nintendo Wii system: Wii Sport, Wii Sport Resort, Wii Play and Just Dance 2 (self-selected) 2x/week (20 min or more) | enjoyment: PACES, subscale of IMI PA: pedometer | enjoyment: PACES (n.s.), IMI (n.s.) PA (n.s.) |
Grâsten and Yli-Piipari, 2019 [47], Finland | Achievement Goal Theory, Social Ecological Model CT t0 (spring 2012), t1 (spring 2013), t2 (spring 2014) latent growth curve models | Elementary school children n = 661 (1) M = 12.23 ± 0.42 (2) M =12.04 ± 0.21 | 2 years (1) Physical Activity as Civil Skill Program (n = 265): task-involving teaching practices in PE, developing physical environment and providing equipment for PA during breaks 90 min PE/week (2) control (n = 396): regular PE 90 min PE/week | enjoyment: PE Enjoyment Scale MVPA: HBSC | No change in PE enjoyment over time in (1) (n.s.) and (2) (n.s.) No time x group interaction effect (n.s.) No relationship between MVPA and enjoyment (n.s.) |
Huberty et al. [40], 2014, USA | Cohort Baseline, post-test (12 weeks), follow up (26 weeks) Friedman test, ANOVA | 7 after school programs n = 182 (100% female) (1) n = 33 (M = 6.4 ± 0.7) (2) n = 90 (M = 9.2 ± 0.8) (3) n = 59 (M = 11.3 ± 0.7) | 12 weeks (1) GoGirlGo: storytelling and discussion (30 min) and PA (30 min) 1 h/week | enjoyment: s-PACES MVPA: accelerometry | increase in enjoyment from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.016), but not from baseline to post-test (n.s.) MVPA from baseline to follow-up n.s. |
Invernizzi et al., 2019 [48], Italy | RCT baseline, post-test ANCOVA | fifth-grade students n = 121 (52% female) M = 10.5 ± 0.5 | 12 weeks (1) n = 62 PE program based on multi teaching approach by graduate PE students (2) n = 59 standard PE lessons by primary teachers 2 h per week | enjoyment: PACES PA: PAQ-C | difference of enjoyment between (1) and (2) (η² = 0.96, p < 0.001) higher increase of PA in (1) compared to (2) (η² = 0.09, p = 0.002) |
Miragall et al., 2017 [46], Spain | TTM RCT baseline, post-test (3 weeks), follow-up (after 3 months) ANCOVAs (controlled for baseline) | inactive university students n = 76 (86% female) M = 22.18 ± 3.71 | 3 weeks (1) IMI (n = 24): internet-based motivational intervention (2) IMI + PED (n = 26): IMI and access to data of pedometer (3) control (n = 26) | enjoyment: s-PACES steps: pedometer | Group main effect in enjoyment (η² = 0.09, p = 0.044), with higher enjoyment in (2) than in (3) (p = 0.038) Group main effect in daily steps (η² = 0.22, p < 0.001), with more daily steps in (2) than (3) (p < 0.001) |
Murillo Pardo et al., 2016 [45], Spain | SDT, Social Ecological Model CT baseline (Oct. 2009), t1 (Oct. 2010), t2 (Oct. 2011), t3 (May 2012) linear mixed models | 4 secondary schoolsn = 553 (47% female) (1) n = 204, 2009–2012 (M = 12.03 ± 0.16) (2) n = 176, 2010–2012 (M = 12.07 ± 0.26) (3) n = 173, 2011–2012 (M = 12.05 ± 0.21) | 1–3 academic years (1) Sigue la Huella: 2 schools (n = 302) multi-component strategy for PE promotion through tutorial action, school PE, information dissemination, participation in institutional and special programs (2) control: 2 schools (n = 251) | enjoyment: PACES MVPA: accelerometer (at least 4 days/week) | positive intervention effect on enjoyment in (1) (β = 0.11, p < 0.001) enjoyment of PA as predictor of MVPA approaches significance (β = 2.22, p = 0.080) time x group interaction effect in MVPA (β = 8.51, p < 0.001) |
Quartiroli and Maeda, 2016 [41], USA | SDT, TPB Cohortbaseline, post-test paired t-tests | university students n = 58 (57% female) M = 18.72 ± 1.09 | 15 weeks (1) 4 sections of a lifetime physical fitness course 3x/week (50 min) | enjoyment: subscale of MPAM-R PA: MPA, VPA, SPA, STPA: sIPAQ | enjoyment (n.s.) PA: MPA (n.s.), VPA (n.s.), SPA (n.s.) |
Robbins et al., 2019 [43], USA | SDT, HPM RCT baseline, post-test (17 weeks), follow-up (9 month) path analysis models | 24 secondary schools n = 1519 (100% female) M = 12.05 ± 1.01 | 17 weeks (1) 12 schools (n = 753) Face-to-face motivational interviewing sessions (begin and end of intervention), after-school PA club offering fun PA opportunities with coaches 3x/week, individually tailored motivational and feedback messages at intervention midpoint (2) control: 12 schools (n = 766) | enjoyment: PA Enjoyment Scale PA: accelerometer (7 days) | positive intervention effect on enjoyment in (1) (B = 0.07, p = 0.047) changes in enjoyment had a positive effect on MVPA change from baseline to post-test (B = 24.48, p < 0.001) negative influence of enjoyment on MVPA change from post-test to follow-up (B = –13.83, p < 0.001) |
Thompson et al., 2013 [42], USA | Cohort baseline, mid- (6 weeks), post-test (12 weeks)t-test, rANOVA | African American church community n = 39 (100% female) M = 14.2 ± 1.6 | 12 weeks (1) Fitness U N -joy project: group discussion focusing at attitude, self-efficacy, enjoyment (30 min) and interactive dance aerobic class (30 min) 1 day/week | enjoyment: PACES PA: APARQ | enjoyment (n.s.) decreasing PA over time (p = 0.01) |
Wang et al., 2015 [49], Singapore | SDT CT baseline, post-test MANOVA | university students n = 62 (50% female) M = 22.30 ± 1.51 | 8 weeks (1) fitness class (n = 17): 1 h lecture, 1 h introduction to set of exercises, 1 h exercising by themselves 1 day/week (2) fitness class as in (1) (n = 14) + Facebook: motivational messages and information about PA, opportunities for interaction 1 day/week (3) exercise program + Facebook as in (2) (n = 24): 1h aerobic exercises with researcher (voluntarily), training beyond aerobic lesson in training room possible 1 day/week (4) control (n = 7) | enjoyment: subscale of IMI PA: IPAQ | time x group interaction effect in enjoyment (η² = 0.34, p < 0.01) with higher enjoyment in (3) than in other groups time x group interaction in PA (η² = 0.41, p < 0.001) with higher PA in (1) and (2) than in (3) and (4) |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Klos, L.; Feil, K.; Eberhardt, T.; Jekauc, D. Interventions to Promote Positive Affect and Physical Activity in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults—A Systematic Review. Sports 2020, 8, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports8020026
Klos L, Feil K, Eberhardt T, Jekauc D. Interventions to Promote Positive Affect and Physical Activity in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults—A Systematic Review. Sports. 2020; 8(2):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports8020026
Chicago/Turabian StyleKlos, Leon, Katharina Feil, Tanja Eberhardt, and Darko Jekauc. 2020. "Interventions to Promote Positive Affect and Physical Activity in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults—A Systematic Review" Sports 8, no. 2: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports8020026
APA StyleKlos, L., Feil, K., Eberhardt, T., & Jekauc, D. (2020). Interventions to Promote Positive Affect and Physical Activity in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults—A Systematic Review. Sports, 8(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports8020026