Previous Article in Journal
Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Steroid Hormones and Psychological Outcomes in Healthy Male Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Collision Volume and Contact Exposure Profile in Elite Women’s Rugby Union: Differences Compared with Men

by
Diego Hernán Villarejo-García
1,
Carlos Navarro-Martínez
2,* and
José Pino-Ortega
1
1
BioVetMed & SportSci Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, 30720 San Javier, Spain
2
Education, Diversity and Quality Research Group, Faculty of Education, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sports 2026, 14(5), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14050210
Submission received: 12 April 2026 / Revised: 10 May 2026 / Accepted: 15 May 2026 / Published: 19 May 2026

Abstract

Elite women’s rugby has often been analysed using the male performance model as a reference, despite evidence that women’s rugby presents distinct game demands and potentially different risk profiles. This study aimed to compare the frequency of key contact-related events between elite men’s and women’s rugby. An observational, retrospective, comparative cohort study was conducted using official performance data from 135 international matches from the men’s and women’s Six Nations Championships. Variables were grouped into three categories: Open-Play, Static Phases, and Discipline. Independent samples t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and Linear Discriminant Analysis were used to identify sex-based differences. The results showed that men presented a higher frequency of rucks lasting more than 6 s (p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were found in total tackles (p = 0.378) or total rucks (p = 0.634). In Static Phases, women’s teams recorded significantly more scrums (p < 0.001). In Discipline, women conceded fewer free kicks (p = 0.003) but received more red cards (p = 0.020). In conclusion, elite women’s rugby shares some open-play characteristics with the men’s game but differs in scrum frequency and disciplinary profile, supporting the existence of a distinct contact and risk exposure profile that should be considered when designing training and prevention strategies.
Keywords: injury prevention; match analysis; gender differences; performance analysis; team sports; six nations injury prevention; match analysis; gender differences; performance analysis; team sports; six nations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Villarejo-García, D.H.; Navarro-Martínez, C.; Pino-Ortega, J. Collision Volume and Contact Exposure Profile in Elite Women’s Rugby Union: Differences Compared with Men. Sports 2026, 14, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14050210

AMA Style

Villarejo-García DH, Navarro-Martínez C, Pino-Ortega J. Collision Volume and Contact Exposure Profile in Elite Women’s Rugby Union: Differences Compared with Men. Sports. 2026; 14(5):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14050210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villarejo-García, Diego Hernán, Carlos Navarro-Martínez, and José Pino-Ortega. 2026. "Collision Volume and Contact Exposure Profile in Elite Women’s Rugby Union: Differences Compared with Men" Sports 14, no. 5: 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14050210

APA Style

Villarejo-García, D. H., Navarro-Martínez, C., & Pino-Ortega, J. (2026). Collision Volume and Contact Exposure Profile in Elite Women’s Rugby Union: Differences Compared with Men. Sports, 14(5), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14050210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop