Experiences and Functional Health Outcomes Associated with a Walking Football Program in Rural Older Adults: A Pilot Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Participants
2.3. Measures
2.4. Intervention
2.5. Focus Group Interview
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Focus Group Interview
3.1.1. “Opportunity to Jump Back in with What We Can Physically Do”
3.1.2. Social Connection and Feeling “Part of Something Bigger”
“We’ve always focussed on the fun and the fitness and the inclusiveness. So, that’s really shone through, whereas I know there were other clubs that they’re really serious about it and that’s okay. But I think having that be an objective of what the purpose is, is really important”.
3.1.3. “It’s How Our Brain Is Engaged”
“I think the mental side of it, too. Like trying to be in some ways, tactical about, trying to figure out where you’re going to go, where the ball’s going to go, keeping your mind ticking over and thinking about, where am I going to go, who can I pass to, where can I position myself? So, yes, really thinking about that side of it too, apart from the physical side, I think that mental stimulation and activity is a big part of it”.
3.2. Anthropometry and Functional Outcomes
4. Discussion
Limitations and Further Research
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
ACT | Arm Curl Test |
BMI | Body Mass Index |
BST | Back Scratch Test |
CSRT | Chair Sit and Reach Test |
CST | 30-s Chair Stand Test |
TUG | 8-foot Times Up and Go Test |
2MST | 2-min Step in Place Test |
6MWT | 6-min Walk Test |
References
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Older Australians; AIHW: Canberra, Australia, 2024. Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australians/contents/about (accessed on 1 November 2024).
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Older Australians; AIHW: Canberra, Australia, 2021. Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australia-at-a-glance/contents/diverse-groups-of-older-australians/regional-remote-communities (accessed on 20 January 2024).
- Chatterji, S.; Byles, J.; Cutler, D.; Seeman, T.; Verdes, E. Health, functioning, and disability in older adults- present status and future implications. Lancet 2015, 385, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jindai, K.; Nielson, C.; Vorderstrasse, B.; Quiñones, A. Multimorbidity and Functional Limitations Among Adults 65 or Older, NHANES 2005–2012. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2016, 13, E151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baernholdt, M.; Yan, G.; Hinton, I.; Rose, K.; Mattos, M. Quality of life in rural and regional adults 65 years and older: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey. J. Rural Health 2012, 28, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, M.; Warburton, J.; O’Halloran, P.; Shields, N.; Kingsley, M. Effective community-based physical activity interventions for older adults living in rural and regional areas: A systematic review. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2016, 24, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Law, M.; Cooper, B.; Strong, S.; Stewart, D.; Rigby, P.; Letts, L. The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 1996, 63, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schrempft, S.; Jackowska, M.; Hamer, M.; Steptoe, A. Associations between social isolation, loneliness, and objective physical activity in older men and women. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4364.0.55.001—Australian Health Survey: First Results, 2017–2018. Canberra. 2019. Available online: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/4364.0.55.001~2017-18~Main%20Features~Physical%20activity~115 (accessed on 21 February 2024).
- Spiteri, K.; Broom, D.; Bekhet, A.H.; de Caro, J.X.; Laventure, B.; Grafton, K. Barriers and Motivators of Physical Activity Participation in Middle-aged and Older-adults—A Systematic Review. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2019, 27, 929–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sivaramakrishnan, H.; Phoenix, C.; Quested, E.; Thogersen-Ntoumani, C.; Gucciardi, D.F.; Cheval, B.; Ntoumanis, N. “More than just a walk in the park”: A multi-stakeholder qualitative exploration of community-based walking sport programmes for middle-aged and older adults. Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health 2023, 15, 772–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cholerton, R.; Butt, J.; Quirk, H.; Breckon, J. Differences in older adults walking football initiation and maintenance influences across respondent characteristics: A cross-sectional survey. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2022, 30, 936–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cholerton, R.; Quirk, H.; Breckon, J.; Butt, J. Experiences and strategies influencing older adults to continue playing walking football. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2021, 29, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McEwan, G.; Buchan, D.; Cowan, D.; Arthur, R.; Sanderson, M.; Macrae, E. Recruiting Older Men to Walking Football: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Explore 2019, 15, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reddy, P.; Dias, I.; Holland, C.; Campbell, N.; Nagar, I.; Connolly, L.; Krustrup, P.; Hubball, H. Walking football as sustainable exercise for older adults—A pilot investigation. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2017, 17, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, J.; Bruce-Low, S.; Sammut, L. The impact of 12 weeks walking football on health and fitness in males over 50 years of age. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2015, 1, Bmjsem-2015-000048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capela, A.; Antunes, P.; Coelho, C.A.; Garcia, C.L.; Custódio, S.; Amorim, R.; Costa, T.; Vilela, E.; Teixeira, M.; Amarelo, A.; et al. Effects of walking football on adherence, safety, quality of life and physical fitness in patients with prostate cancer: Findings from the PROSTATA_MOVE randomised controlled trial. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1129028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamont, E.; Harris, J.; McDonald, G.; Kerin, T.; Dickens, G. Qualitative investigation of the role of collaborative football and walking football groups in mental health recovery. Ment. Health Phys Act. 2017, 12, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corepal, R.; Zhang, J.; Grover, S.; Hubball, H.; Ashe, M. Walking soccer: A systematic review of a modified sport. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2020, 30, 2282–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Australian Government Department of Health. Modified Monash Model. 2020. Available online: https://www.health.gov.au/health-topics/health-workforce/health-workforce-classifications/modified-monash-model#what-is-the-mmm-used-for (accessed on 31 January 2025).
- Norton, K. Standards for anthropometry assessment. In Kinanthropometry and Exercise Physiology; Norton, K., Eston, R., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Rikli, R.; Jones, J. The development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. J. Aging Phys. Act. 1999, 7, 129–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liamputtong, P. Focus Group Methodology: Principle and Practice; SAGE: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Acocella, I.; Cataldi, S. Moderating the focus group. In Using Focus Groups: Theory, Methodology, Practice; SAGE Publications Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, W.; Marshall, S.; Batterham, A.; Hanin, J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009, 41, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Repke, M.; Ipsen, C. Differences in social connectedness and perceived isolation among rural and urban adults with disabilities. Disabil. Health J. 2020, 13, 100829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wilson, L.; Rice, C.; Thompson, S. Social participation and loneliness in older adults in a rural Australian context: Individual and organizational perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Romein, J.; Hutchins, G.; Ottrey, E.; Talpey, S.; Bishop, J. A community-based modified sport program for rural community-dwelling older adults: A pilot study. Aust. J. Rural Health 2024, 32, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyons, A.; Fletcher, G.; Farmer, J.; Kenny, A.; Bourke, L.; Carra, K.; Bariola, E. Participation in rural community groups and links with psychological well-being and resilience: A cross-sectional community-based study. BMC Psychol. 2016, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caspers, A.; Andersson, H.; Godhe, M.; Fransson, D.; Ekblom-Bak, E.; Börjesson, M. Walking Football for Men and Women 60+: A 12-Week Non-Controlled Intervention Affects Health Parameters. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2025, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haq, M.; Tiwari, S.; Tiwari, S. Stepping Towards Better Health: The Effects of Walking Football for 12 Weeks on Cardiovascular Health in Hypertensive Male Senior Citizens. Phys. Educ. Theory Methodol. 2024, 24, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Physical Activity; AIHW: Canberra, Australia, 2024. Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/physical-activity/physical-activity (accessed on 19 June 2025).
- Johnson, A.; Sultana, R.; Brown, W.; Bauman, A.; Gill, T. Physical activity in the management of obesity in adults: A position statement from Exercise and Sport Science Australia. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2021, 24, 1245–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rikli, R.; Jones, J. Functional fitness normative scores for community-residing older adults, ages 60–94. J. Aging Phys. Act. 1999, 7, 162–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pre | Post | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | % Change | Mean Difference | Cohens d | |
Mass (kg) | 83.9 (69.7–90.2) | 82.0 (67.6–98.8) | 77.9 (66.5–87.4) | 85.4 (71.4–92.1) | 83.9 (69.3–101.3) | 79.5 (68.3–88.3) | 1.7 | 1.5 (−2.5–−0.4) | 0.07 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 28.2 (23.5–30.3) | 25.7 (21.8–30.8) | 28.1 (23.9–32.2) | 28.8 (24.1–30.8) | 26.2 (21.9–31.4) | 28.7 (24.7–32.5) | 1.8 | 0.5 (−0.9–−0.2) | 0.08 |
CST (reps) | 13.9 (12.7–15.4) | 13.1 (11.2–15.0) | 15.0 (14.0–16.0) | 15.2 (14.3–16.3) | 14.7 (13.6–16.1) | 16.0 (15.3–17.0) | 10.1 | 1.3 (−2.3–−0.3) | 0.49 |
ACT (reps) | 19.0 (16.1–22.5) | 16.3 (14.5–18.5) | 22.2 (18.0–26.3) | 21.4 (18.6–24.4) | 19.0 (16.8–21.7) | 24.0 (21.4–27.8) | 10.9 | 2.4 (−3.9–−0.8) | 0.49 |
TUG (s) | 5.7 (5.1–6.1) | 5.8 (5.1–6.5) | 5.3 (4.8–5.8) | 4.9 (4.4–5.2) | 4.9 (4.2–5.5) | 4.8 (4.5–4.9) | 14.0 | 0.8 (0.5–1.2) | −0.9 |
CSRT (cm) | Right: 1.8 (−1.56–8.9) | 1.7 (−4.1–6.0) | 5.7 (−2.0–13.3) | Right: 2.1 (−1.4–7.6) | 0.1 (−5.7–5.1) | 6.3 (1.5–11.3) | 16.7 | 0.3 (−5.8–5.3) | 0.02 |
Left: 1.8 (−1.1–8.9) | 2.3 (−4.7–7.7) | 5.5 (−0.6–11.5) | Left: 3.1 (−1.3–8.8) | 0.3 (−6.0–5.9) | 7.2 (1.8–13.1) | 72.2 | 1.3 (−6.5–3.9) | 0.12 | |
BST (cm) | Right: −16.4 (−21.5–−8.2) | −15.3 (−25.8–−5.6) | −14.3 (−21.2–−8.0) | Right: −14.1 (−18.7–−5.3) | −15.7 (−24.9–−6.1) | −8.3 (−15.9–−2.2) | 13.4 | 2.23 (−5.6–1.2) | 0.19 |
Left: −19.6 (−24.1–−8.37) | −20.5 (−30.6–−8.4) | −12.0 (−18.8–−5.2) | Left: −18.4 (−24.9–−10.4) | −22.2 (−29.7–−11.0) | −13.1 (−20.2–−7.3) | 6.5 | 1.19 (−3.2–5.6) | 0.08 | |
2MST (reps) | 196.2 (181.1–216.2) | 192.3 (168.6–217.8) | 205.0 (188.0–222.6) | 217.7 (198.9–238.8) | 213.3 (187.8–232.0) | 224.3 (198.2–249.7) | 10.9 | 21.5 (−39.2–−3.8) | 0.72 |
6MWT (m) | 538.3 (510.6–566.1) | 546.7 (511.7–595.8) | 530.0 (503.8–550.7) | 609.3 (571.8–646.8) | 608.3 (571.3–649.9) | 610.3 (549.7–663.3) | 13.2 | 71 (−97.3–−44.7) | 1.6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cousins, S.; McIntyre, K.; Lyristakis, P.; Padula, K.; McCaig, J.; Gordon, B. Experiences and Functional Health Outcomes Associated with a Walking Football Program in Rural Older Adults: A Pilot Study. Sports 2025, 13, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080272
Cousins S, McIntyre K, Lyristakis P, Padula K, McCaig J, Gordon B. Experiences and Functional Health Outcomes Associated with a Walking Football Program in Rural Older Adults: A Pilot Study. Sports. 2025; 13(8):272. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080272
Chicago/Turabian StyleCousins, Stephen, Kylie McIntyre, Philip Lyristakis, Keanu Padula, Jane McCaig, and Brett Gordon. 2025. "Experiences and Functional Health Outcomes Associated with a Walking Football Program in Rural Older Adults: A Pilot Study" Sports 13, no. 8: 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080272
APA StyleCousins, S., McIntyre, K., Lyristakis, P., Padula, K., McCaig, J., & Gordon, B. (2025). Experiences and Functional Health Outcomes Associated with a Walking Football Program in Rural Older Adults: A Pilot Study. Sports, 13(8), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13080272