Next Article in Journal
Two Native Anagrus spp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) Are Egg Parasitoids of the Invasive Two-Spot Cotton Leafhopper Amrasca biguttula (Ishida) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in Florida, USA
Previous Article in Journal
Simuliids (Diptera: Simuliidae) from Eastern Andalusia (Spain): Update and New Contributions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 17
Issue 3
10.3390/insects17030268
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In-Field Diadegma insulare (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Parasitism Rates of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Virginia Cole Crops

by
Taylore A. Tomlinson
1,*,
Alejandro I. Del Pozo-Valdivia
2 and
Thomas P. Kuhar
1,*
1
Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2
Department of Entomology, Virgina Tech Hampton Roads AREC, Virgina Beach, VA 23455, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2026, 17(3), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17030268
Submission received: 2 February 2026 / Revised: 17 February 2026 / Accepted: 28 February 2026 / Published: 3 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), is a pest of brassica crops that is found around the world and is challenging to manage due to insecticide resistance. To manage this pest, alternative integrated pest management techniques are being explored. Biological control of the diamondback moth by parasitoid wasps, such as Diadegma insulare, Oomyzus sokolowskii, and Microplites plutellae, has been previously studied in the literature. However, there are no current records of parasitism rate activity on P. xylostella in Virginia in the past 15 years. This information is crucial to determine the role of biological control agents in managing P. xylostella and whether it could potentially be used as a control strategy. We sampled locations across Virginia from 2022 to 2025 to survey the current parasitism rates of P. xylostella on brassica farms. The percentage rates of parasitism averaged between 30.1 and 65% each year. The lowest rate of parasitism was 15% in 2025, with the highest at 100% in 2022. Overall, our findings suggest that D. insulare is currently playing a role in P. xylostella management in Virginia and has the potential to be successful as a biological control agent when paired with other management strategies. No other parasitoids were found during the study.

Abstract

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), is a significant pest of brassica crops that is found across the globe. Due to the development of insecticide resistance, control tactics have shifted focus towards integrating pest management techniques such as biological control. Diadegma insulare (C.), Oomyzus sokolowskii (K.), and Microplites plutellae (M.) are parasitoids of P. xylostella found in the Eastern United States. From 2022 to 2025, we surveyed P. xylostella larvae and pupae in locations across Virginia to assess the current rates of parasitism in brassica fields. Specimens were brought to the laboratory and reared to assess parasitoid emergence rates. Only D. insulare specimens were found during the study. Adult P. xylostella, larvae and pupae, adult D. insulare, D. insulare pupae, unknown parasitoids, and unknown deaths were recorded and used to calculate the rates of parasitism at each location. We concluded that the parasitism rate varied by location and year, which was expected due to regional conditions and seasonality. Rates averaged between 30.1 and 65% by year, with the lowest individual rate being 15% in 2025 and the highest at 100% in 2022. This suggests that D. insulare is actively present in Virginia and could be a successful biological control agent when paired with other integrated pest management techniques to reduce P. xylostella populations.

1. Introduction

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), is a significant pest of brassica (Brassica spp.) crops in most parts of the world [1], including all vegetable-growing regions of the United States [2]. Plutella xylostella can be particularly difficult to manage due to its rapid ability to develop insecticide resistance [3]. This pest is already resistant to over 100 insecticides used to manage lepidopteran pests in brassica systems [4,5]. The current challenge of insecticide resistance has shifted the focus to developing integrated pest management (IPM) practices for the management of P. xylostella, including the augmentation and conservation of biological control [1,2,6,7]. Biological control can be a complementary control tactic to help reduce resistant lepidopteran pest populations that remain after insecticide applications.
Hymenoptera parasitoids are the most extensively studied and can be impactful in controlling P. xylostella populations, with numerous species previously reported [1,6,8]. Twenty-two species of parasitoids of P. xylostella have been described around the globe [9]. Three commonly reported larval parasitoids of P. xylostella in North America are Diadegma insulare (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), Microplites plutellae (Muesebeck) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and Oomyzus sokolowskii (Kurdjumov) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. These three species have also been reported in Virginia, but very little is known about their current parasitism rates. Diadegma insulare is likely the most common P. xylostella parasitoid found in fields in the Eastern United States, but current surveys are lacking [18]. Adult D. insulare and M. plutellae are solitary wasps and host-specific, unlike other species, such as O. sokolowskii, which is gregarious with a large host range [14,18,19,20]. Parasitism by D. insulare occurs when the adult female parasitoid wasp inserts her ovipositor into the host’s larval body and deposits eggs. Once the host pupates, the parasitoid eggs will hatch and the larva will exit the host body to pupate, resulting in host death. The parasitoid wasp larvae will use the pupal casings of its host for protection [21].
Parasitism rate surveys could be used to determine the species complex, incidence, and relative importance of parasitoids with regard to the biological control of a pest organism. Determining the rates of parasitism of target hosts can be difficult due to the nature of endoparasitoids developing within the larval host body. Additionally, it would be difficult to determine the abundance of parasitoids in each region due to their small size and vulnerability to detrimental conditions, such as weather conditions or insecticide spraying [22,23]. Parasitism rate surveys are used to determine the parasitism of a subsample of a target pest, such as P. xylostella, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), or Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [24,25]. These surveys can be conducted in three different ways: (1) rearing the parasitoid from a host, (2) dissecting field-collected host larvae to determine parasitoid presence [26], or (3) using PCR-based identification methods [27].
Diadegma insulare has been reported across the United States through parasitism surveys of P. xylostella populations in brassica systems. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the parasitism rates of D. insulare were found to be as high as 88% in East Lansing, Michigan, during peak growing season [28,29]. In Santa Cruz, California, the parasitism rates of D. insulare were as high as 70–100% [30]. However, in the Eastern United States, low to moderate rates of parasitism have been recorded when surveyed in Gainesville, Florida (3–72%) and Geneva, New York (15–46%) [16,31]. All of these studies were conducted in the summer, during warm weather and at peak population densities. However, recent studies have not been conducted to determine up-to-date parasitism rates of P. xylostella in Virginia or other mid-Atlantic states.
Research on the topic of parasitism is crucial to determine whether this form of biological control contributes to managing P. xylostella populations alongside proper insecticide active ingredient selection and timing in Virginia during the growing season. The use of biological control alongside other control practices can help growers to manage P. xylostella populations and reduce the risk of further insecticide resistance development. The goal of this study was to determine the parasitism rates of D. insulare and other potential parasitoid species on field-collected P. xylostella, providing information about the significance of biological control of P. xylostella in brassica systems in Virginia.

2. Materials and Methods

Parasitism surveys were focused on the collection of P. xylostella larvae and pupae from conventional commercial and organic brassica fields. Eight field sites were selected based on the known presence of P. xylostella in different regions of Virginia (2022–2025). Sites included Woodstock, Pungo, Hillsville, Whitethorne, Mechanicsville, Floyd, Charlotte Court House, and Buckingham (Figure 1). Field sites were commercial, conventional brassica fields, consisting of green cabbage, collards, and broccoli, except for Floyd, which was a small-production organic farm (Table 1). Field sites were managed at the discretion of our grower collaborators. With the exception of the organic field site in Floyd, commercial practices also included the spraying of pesticides in these fields. At each location, the number of P. xylostella specimens collected varied due to density. A minimum of 10 larvae or pupae were collected per field site, since collections happened once per field site. Collected specimens were brought back to the laboratory in Blacksburg, Virginia and separated into Petri dishes in groups of five specimens with a fresh untreated cabbage leaf or with filter paper for pupae [Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA]. Petri dishes were checked for emergence every 48 h for 7 days to allow enough time for specimens to eclose. At each check, the numbers of adult P. xylostella, P. xylostella larvae, P. xylostella pupae, live D. insulare adults, D. insulare pupae, other parasitoids, and unknown deaths of specimens were recorded. Parasitoids were identified through keys provided by the American Entomological Institute (2015).
Percent parasitism rates were calculated using the following formula for each location:
Parasitism   rate   ( % )   =   100 × ( Number   parasitoids   emerged Number   parasitoids   emerged   +   P .   xylostella   pupae )
Percentage rates were averaged across all dishes from a single location. Percentage means and standard errors were calculated using the package ‘dplyr’ in R (R Studio Team 2023, version 2023.12.1+402). These means were not modeled or compared statistically between locations due to variability in regional conditions. Additionally, each field site was managed differently, with varying soil types and cultural practices. Unknown death rates were determined when P. xylostella larvae were moribund with no signs of parasitism and were recorded.

3. Results

In 2022, across all locations, 434 P. xylostella larvae were collected, with 178 reared D. insulare. The number of unknown dead specimens recorded was 81. This resulted in the overall mean percentage of parasitism being 65% in 2022. The mean P. xylostella parasitism rates for D. insulare varied across the sampling locations. Whitethorne displayed the highest rate of parasitism (100%), while Mechanicsville displayed the lowest rate (26.2%). Moderate to high levels of parasitism were observed in Charlotte Courthouse (85.0%), Pungo (75.6%), Hillsville (61.7%), and Woodstock (44.7%) (Figure 1).
In 2023, a total of 258 P. xylostella specimens were collected, with 29 unknown deaths and 89 D. insulare emerged. The mean parasitism rates were lower in some of the sampling locations compared to the previous year. The collected specimens of P. xylostella showed the following mean rates of parasitism: Mechanicsville 77.4%, Floyd 37.5%, Whitethorne 33.3%, Hillsville 20.0%, and Pungo 18.5% (Figure 1). Overall, the average parasitism rate in 2023 was 37.3%. In 2024, only three locations in Virginia were sampled, with a total of 417 P. xylostella collected and 119 D. insulare emerged, and 51 unknown deaths were recorded. The overall average parasitism rate for the 2024 surveys was 49.0%. The average parasitism rates varied, with the highest in Charotte Courthouse (63.6%), followed by Buckingham (50.0%) and Mechanicsville (33.0%) (Figure 1).
Similarly, in 2025, only three locations were sampled in Virginia due to low larval presence and reduced pest pressure. In total, 62 P. xylostella specimens were collected, with 21 D. insulare emerged specimens. Whitethorne showed the highest parasitism (42.0%), followed by Hillsville (33.3%) and Mechanicsville (15.0%) (Figure 1). The average overall parasitism rate in 2025 was 30.1%. In 2025, 18 unknown deaths were recorded. Across all field sites and all years, a total of 1171 P. xylostella and 407 D. insulare were collected over four years for this study. No O. sokolowskii or other parasitoids were recovered from any of our samples across all field sites and all years.

4. Discussion

Plutella xylostella is a challenging pest to manage in brassica systems due to insecticide resistance. Our results from in-field parasitism rate surveys showed relatively high parasitism levels across Virginia. The highest rates were recorded in 2022 in Whitethorne at 100.0% and in Charlotte Court House at 85.0%. These rates were recorded from locations under conventional insecticide application regimens, which could explain the potential resiliency of D. insulare to still parasitize P. xylostella under adverse conditions. Additionally, the recorded parasitism rates never fell below 15.0%, showing that D. insulare is an active biological control agent in Virginia. As an important IPM practice, it is crucial to determine whether conventional or organic insecticidal applications have a significant effect on the ability of parasitoids to find and attack their hosts.
Effective IPM requires the incorporation and fostering of natural enemy populations by reducing the number of spray applications and applying insecticides with limited non-target effects. Furthermore, conducting insecticide applications when natural enemy populations are low or not present would be beneficial for the implementation of an IPM program that aims to promote conservational biological control. Given the frequent use of insecticides in brassica systems, it is important to understand the effects of the applied insecticides on parasitoids as part of a sound pest management program [18]. Organic insecticides may pose a lower risk to D. insulare. In early experiments, D. insulare was shown to be able to effectively parasitize P. xylostella and was unaffected by applications of spinosad [32]. Furthermore, Xu et al. (2004) tested the effects of azadiractin-based insecticides on D. insulare in treated Petri dishes, which resulted in 0.0–10.4% mortality [33]. Specimens of D. insulare that survived the organic treatments were able to parasitize 50.8–67.6% of collected P. xylostella larvae [33]. However, azadiractin-based insecticides are not commonly used for P. xylostella management. Cordero et al. (2007) studied disks under laboratory conditions in which cabbage leaf was treated with broad-spectrum insecticides such as esfenvalerate (pyrethroid), methomyl (carbamate), or acephate (organophosphate), which resulted in 100.0% mortality among adults of D. insulare and O. sokolowskii at field rate concentrations after 72 h [18]. Additionally, more IPM-compatible insecticides, such as emamectin benzoate, spinosad, and indoxacarb, also resulted in 100% mortality among both parasitoid species after 72 h [18]. In contrast to the studies by Hill and Foster (2000) [32], Cordero et al. (2007) [18] found complete mortality of O. sokolowskii and D. insulare when exposed to field rate concentrations of spinosad, an organic insecticide, after 72 h. Cordero et al. (2007) used a much higher rate of spinosad (73.2 mg) and monitored insects for up to 72 h, while Hill and Foster (2000) used a lower rate of spinosad (0.31 mg) and monitored for 24 h [18,32].
There are several potential factors influencing the variability in the parasitism rates documented across the sampling locations in this study. Each location may have different growing seasons, host plants, pest densities, weather and climate conditions, soil types, commercial standard practices, spray application types and timing, and other environmental factors that could have affected the abundance of these parasitoids [34]. Sampling for P. xylostella specimens also varied regarding the time of the year, where larvae were mostly collected at the peak of the growing season at each location. Additionally, a few locations showed a drop in parasitism rates from the initial sampling year. In 2022, Whitethorne showed 100% parasitism but this dropped significantly to 33% (2023) and 42% (2024) in the following years. In 2025, only 62 P. xylostella specimens were collected from three different locations. These changes in parasitism rates and P. xylostella abundance could have been the result of intensive spray regimens or harsh weather conditions, such as high rainfall.
The question remains as to why P. xylostella is still a significant problem in brassica systems if these parasitoids and heavy spray applications are present. It can be difficult to rely on successful biological control alone. Biological control agents, such as D. insulare, require proper timing to parasitize their hosts. Diadegma insulare has a preference for parasitizing the fourth instar of P. xylostella [17]. If synchrony in generations between the parasitoid and host is not present, it can be difficult to achieve high rates of parasitism [35,36,37]. Additionally, if a field site has been heavily sprayed with insecticides, P. xylostella may show some resistance, while biological control agents like D. insulare and O. sokolowskii have shown high susceptibility to many conventional active ingredients [5,18]. It is important to use IPM practices to help manage P. xylostella, reducing the risks of resistance and conserving biological control agents.
Throughout this study, unknown deaths of collected P. xylostella specimens were recorded. Across four years of sampling and rearing P. xylostella, a range of 18–81 unknown deaths occurred. This could have been the result of the cross-contamination of insecticides on the leaf discs used to rear P. xylostella specimens to adulthood in the laboratory. Leaves were obtained from green cabbage heads bought from the organic section of the local grocery store and washed thoroughly. Collected specimens were stored in a cooler during transport from the sampling location to the laboratory; this often required four or more hours of driving, which could have cause stress in the larvae. Furthermore, the sampled field locations could have been recently treated with insecticides, which may have been present on P. xylostella specimens when they were collected.
It is important to note that D. insulare was the only parasitoid found in all of the samples across four years in Virginia. Oomyzus sokolowskii and M. plutellae have also been previously recorded in the Eastern United States but were not found during this survey [11,15]. A possible limitation of the study methodology is that O. sokolowskii and M. plutellae can take up to 3–4 weeks to eclose from pupae [20]. Furthermore, there can be differences in population peaks for O. sokolowskii and M. plutellae depending on regionality. The results of this survey showed that 407 D. insulare emerged from 1171 P. xylostella specimens collected, demonstrating a high abundance of D. insulare populations across Virginia. A total of 34% of all P. xylostella collected across the four years and collection sites were parasitized by D. insulare. These results demonstrate the importance of D. insulare as a biological control agent of P. xylostella, as well as the value of integrated pest management tactics that conserve this biological control agent.
The conservation of biological control agents such as D. insulare can be achieved through well-planned pest management practices and by minimizing significant non-target effects. The timing and number of insecticidal applications can have an effect on natural enemy populations. If broad-spectrum insecticides are sprayed during peak hours of natural enemy activity, there is a chance that these populations could be harmed. Additionally, a high rate of application could reduce natural enemy populations after multiple insecticides are sprayed. It is important to determine the insecticides with the greatest potential to harm biological control agents, considering previous information from bioassays and insecticide treatment experiments [18,38,39,40,41].
Diadegma insulare also may have the potential to serve as an augmentative biological control agent, but further studies are needed to understand the impacts of releasing large numbers of D. insulare into the field. Augmentative biological control can be costly, and success can be strongly influenced by economical barriers and non-target risks, such as release rates or timing, intensive insecticidal applications, regulation policies, mass rearing challenges, and weather conditions [42].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.P.K., A.I.D.P.-V. and T.A.T.; methodology, T.P.K., A.I.D.P.-V. and T.A.T.; software, T.A.T.; validation, T.P.K. and A.I.D.P.-V.; formal analysis, T.A.T. and A.I.D.P.-V.; investigation, T.A.T., T.P.K. and A.I.D.P.-V.; resources, T.A.T., T.P.K. and A.I.D.P.-V.; data curation, T.A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, T.A.T.; writing—reviewing and editing, T.P.K. and A.I.D.P.-V.; visualization, T.A.T.; supervision, T.P.K. and A.I.D.P.-V.; project administration, T.P.K. and A.I.D.P.-V.; funding acquisition, T.P.K. and A.I.D.P.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by USDA NIFA Crop Protection and Pest Management Grant 2023-70006-40605 and a 2022 USDA Specialty Crop Block Grant—Virgina.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the time and commitment of the members of the Virginia Tech Vegetable Insect Pest Research Laboratory, including Brian Currin, Matthew Sharpe, Anthonie Flores-Chicas, Sarah McNamara, Katelyn Currin, Hannah Swarm, Kelly Bekelja, Kemper Sutton, Katlyn Catron, Mika Pagani, and Gracie Gonzalez; the Virginia Tech Hampton Roads Agriculture Research Extension Center, including Shannon Bradley, Eleanor Lane, and Julie Brindley; Virginia Cooperative Extension agents Ashley Edwards, Joanne Jones, and Laura Maxey-Nay; and the growers for their contributions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Talekar, N.S.; Shelton, A.M. Biology, ecology, and management of the diamondback moth. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1993, 38, 275–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Philips, C.R.; Fu, Z.; Kuhar, T.P.; Shelton, A.M.; Cordero, R.J. Natural history, ecology, and management of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) with emphasis on the United States. J. Int. Pest Manag. 2014, 5, D1–D11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Shelton, A.M.; Robertson, J.L.; Tang, J.D.; Perez, C.; Eigenbrode, S.D.; Preisler, H.K.; Wilsey, W.T.; Cooley, R.J. Resistance of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to bacillus thuringiensis subspecies in the field. J. Econ. Entomol. 1993, 86, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Zhao, J.Z.; Grafius, E.J. Assessment of different bioassay techniques for resistance monitoring in the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 1993, 86, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Riley, D.; Smith, H.; Bennett, J.; Torrance, P.; Huffman, E.; Sparks, A.; Gruver, C.; Dunn, T.; Champagne, D. Regional survey of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) response to maximum dosages of insecticides in Georgia and Florida. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 2458–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Sarfraz, M.; Keddie, A.B.; Dosdall, L.M. Biological control of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella: A review. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2005, 15, 763–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Furlong, M.J.; Wright, D.J.; Dosdall, L.M. Diamondback moth ecology and management: Problems, progress, and prospects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013, 58, 517–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Goodwin, S. Changes in numbers in the parasitoid complex associated with the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.)(Lepidoptera), in Victoria. Aust. J. Zool. 1979, 27, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Kfir, R. Origin of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1998, 91, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Pimentel, D. Natural control of caterpillar populations on cole crops. J. Econ. Entomol. 1961, 54, 889–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Harcourt, D.G. Major mortality factors in the population dynamics of the diamondback moth, Plutella maculipennis (C.)(Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 1963, 95, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Putnam, L.G. Experiments in the quantitative relations between Diadegma insularis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and Microplitis plutellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with their host Plutella maculipennis (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Can. Entomol. 1968, 100, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Oatman, E.R.; Platner, G.R. An ecological study of insect populations on cabbage in southern California. Hilgardia 1969, 40, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Latheef, M.A.; Irwin, R.D. Seasonal abundance and parasitism of lepidopteraus larvae on brassica greens in Virginia. J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 1983, 18, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Lasota, J.A.; Kok, L.T. Diadegma insularis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) parasitism of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in southwest Virginia. J. Entomol. Sci. 1986, 21, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Mitchell, E.R.; Hu, G.Y.; Okine, J.S. Diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) infestation and parasitism by Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in collards and adjacent cabbage fields. Fla. Entomol. 1997, 80, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Xu, J.; Shelton, A.M.; Cheng, X. Comparison of Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and Microplitis plutellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as biological control agents of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Field parasitism, insecticide susceptibility, and host-searching. J. Econ. Entomol. 2001, 94, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Cordero, R.J.; Bloomquist, J.R.; Kuhar, T.P. Susceptibility of two diamondback moth parasitoids, Diadegma insulare (Cresson)(Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and Oomyzus sokolowskii (Kurdjumov)(Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) to selected commercial insecticides. Biol. Control 2007, 42, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Fitton, M.G.; Walker, A.K. Hymenopterous parasitoids associated with diamondback moth: The taxonomic dilemma. In Diamondback Moth and Other Cruciferous Pests: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop; Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center: Tainan, Taiwan, 1992; pp. 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  20. Talekar, N.S.; Hu, W.J. Characteristics of parasitism of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) by Oomyzus sokolowskii (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Entomophaga 1996, 41, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Harcourt, D.G. Biology of diamondback moth, Plutella maculipennis (C.)(Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in eastern Ontario. Can. Entomol. 1960, 92, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Gauld, I.D.; Janzen, D.H. The systematics and biology of the Costa Rican species of parasitic wasps in the Thyreodon genus-group (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2004, 141, 297–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Frazer, S.E.; Dytham, C.; Mayhew, P.J. Determinants of parasitoid abundance and diversity in woodland habitats. J. Appl. Ecol. 2007, 44, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Falcon-Brindis, A.; Stireman, J.O.; Viloria, Z.J.; Villanueva, R.T. Parasitism of Corn Earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), by Tachinid Flies in Cultivated Hemp. Insects 2022, 13, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Otim, M.H.; Adumo, S.A.; Opio, M.; Kanyesigye, D.; Nakelet, H.O.; Tek Tay, W. Parasitoid distribution and parasitism of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in different maize producing regions of Uganda. Insects 2021, 12, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Van Driesche, R.G.; Bellows, T.S.; Elkinton, J.S.; Gould, J.R.; Ferro, D.N. The meaning of percentage parasitism revisited: Solutions to the problem of accurately estimating total losses from parasitism. J. Environ. Entomol. 1991, 20, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Greenstone, M.H. Molecular methods for assessing insect parasitism. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2006, 96, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Zhao, J.Z.; Ayers, G.S.; Grafius, E.J.; Stehr, F.W. Effects of neighboring nectar-producing plants on populations of pest Lepidoptera and their parasitoids in broccoli plantings. Great Lakes Entomol. 1992, 25, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Idris, A.B.; Grafius, E. Wildflowers as nectar sources for Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a parasitoid of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). J. Environ. Entomol. 1995, 24, 1726–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Fox, L.R.; Letourneau, D.K.; Eisenach, J.; Van Nouhuys, S. Parasitism rates and sex ratios of a parasitoid wasp: Effects of herbivore and plant quality. Oecologia 1990, 83, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Shelton, A.M.; Wilsey, W.T.; Hoebeke, E.R.; Schmaedick, M.A. Parasitoids of cabbage lepidoptera in Central New York. J. Entomol. Sci. 2002, 37, 270–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Hill, T.A.; Foster, R.E. Effect of insecticides on the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and its parasitoid Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2000, 93, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Xu, Y.; Liu, T.; Leibee, G.L.; Jones, W.A. Effects of selected insecticides on Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a parasitoid of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2004, 14, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Idris, A.B.; Grafius, E. Effects of wild and cultivated host plants on oviposition, survival, and development of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and its parasitoid Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). J. Environ. Entomol. 1996, 25, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Lalonde, R.G. Some dynamical consequences of parasitoid diapause. Oikos 2004, 107, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. MacDonald, H.; Brisson, D. Host phenology regulates parasite-host demographic cycles and eco-evolutionary feedbacks. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e8658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Aquila, L.C.; Li, X.; Akutse, K.S.; Bamisile, B.S.; Moreano, J.P.; Lie, Z.; Liu, J. Host-parasitoid phenology, distribution, and biological control under climate change. Life 2023, 13, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Roubos, C.R.; Rodriguez-Saona, C.; Isaacs, R. Mitigating the effects of insecticides on arthropod biological control at field and landscape scales. Biol. Control 2014, 75, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Ngin, C.; Suon, S.; Tanaka, T.; Yamauchi, A.; Kazuhito, K.; Chiba, S. Impact of insecticide applications on arthropod predators and plant feeders in Cambodian rice fields. Phytobiomes 2017, 1, 2471–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Sánchez-Bayo, F. Indirect effect of pesticides on insects and other arthropods. Toxics 2021, 9, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Wolz, M.; Hocherl, A.; Hubner, J.; Hans-Peter, T.; Whitmore, D.; Leroy, B.M.; Weisser, W.W.; Mitesser, O.; Evgeny, V.Z.; Herbert, P.D.; et al. Response of parasitoid communities to insecticide application during Lymantria dispar outbreak in mixed oak forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 2024, 61, 2774–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Wright, M.G.; Hoffmann, M.P.; Kuhar, T.P.; Gardner, J.; Pitcher, S.A. Evaluating risks of biological control introductions: A probabilistic risk-assessment approach. Biol. Control 2005, 35, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Insects 17 00268 g001
Figure 1. Field site map with average percent parasitism rate ± standard error of field-collected P. xylostella specimens for D. insulare sampled in Virginia by year.
Figure 1. Field site map with average percent parasitism rate ± standard error of field-collected P. xylostella specimens for D. insulare sampled in Virginia by year.
Insects 17 00268 g001
Table 1. Field site variables by location and sample date. Each location was maintained at the grower’s discretion.
Table 1. Field site variables by location and sample date. Each location was maintained at the grower’s discretion.
LocationSample DateFarm TypeCrop CultivarRow SpacingField SizeSpecimens Collected
Mechanicsville06/09/2022
25/04/2023
06/06/2024
09/06/2025		ConventionalBroccoli: Eastern Crown, Commonwealth
Cabbage: Blue Vantage, Gregorian		Single plant rows 1 m apart, 0.3 m plant spacing14.16 ha519
Hillsville27/07/2022
07/08/2023
16/10/2025		ConventionalCabbage: Savoy, Brennan, Bruno, Ramada1.8 m beds of 3 seeding rows, 0.5 m plant spacing4.04–8 ha65
Charlotte Courthouse07/09/2022
25/09/2024		ConventionalCabbage: Savoy, Brennan, Bruno, RamadaSingle plant rows 1 m apart, 0.3 m plant spacing6.07 ha95
Pungo21/06/2022
24/04/2023		ConventionalCabbage: Ramada, Bruno, Blue Vantage Broccoli: Eastern Crown and CommonwealthSingle plant rows 1 m apart, 0.3 m plant spacing2.02 ha377
Whitethorne02/09/2022
07/07/2023		ConventionalCabbage: Bronco6 m beds of 1 plant row, 0.3 m plant spacing0.4 ha87
Woodstock29/06/2022ConventionalCabbage: Ramada, Bronco, Savoy, Red CabbageSingle plant rows 1 m apart, 0.3 m plant spacing4.04 ha52
Floyd15/06/2023OrganicCabbage: Red Cabbage, Savoy, Late Flat Dutch, BrunswickSingle plant rows 1 m apart, 0.3 m plant spacing0.81 ha13
Buckingham16/05/2024ConventionalCabbage: Savoy, Brennan, BrunoSingle plant rows 1 m apart, 0.3 m plant spacing2.02 ha11
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tomlinson, T.A.; Del Pozo-Valdivia, A.I.; Kuhar, T.P. In-Field Diadegma insulare (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Parasitism Rates of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Virginia Cole Crops. Insects 2026, 17, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17030268

AMA Style

Tomlinson TA, Del Pozo-Valdivia AI, Kuhar TP. In-Field Diadegma insulare (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Parasitism Rates of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Virginia Cole Crops. Insects. 2026; 17(3):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17030268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tomlinson, Taylore A., Alejandro I. Del Pozo-Valdivia, and Thomas P. Kuhar. 2026. "In-Field Diadegma insulare (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Parasitism Rates of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Virginia Cole Crops" Insects 17, no. 3: 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17030268

APA Style

Tomlinson, T. A., Del Pozo-Valdivia, A. I., & Kuhar, T. P. (2026). In-Field Diadegma insulare (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Parasitism Rates of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Virginia Cole Crops. Insects, 17(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17030268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop