Next Article in Journal
Plant Signaling Mediates Interactions Between Fall and Southern Armyworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Their Shared Parasitoid Cotesia icipe (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Microbial Biopesticides to Control Whiteflies in Eggplant Solanum melongena, in Greenhouse
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acorn Weevil Species Diversity and Host Affinity in the Semi-Humid Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forests of Southwest China

1
School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
2
Institute of Ecology and Geobotany, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
3
Yuxi Institute of Ecology and Environment Science, Yuxi 653100, China
4
Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
5
Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
6
School of Agriculture, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(6), 579; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060579
Submission received: 10 April 2025 / Revised: 16 May 2025 / Accepted: 28 May 2025 / Published: 30 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Ecology, Diversity and Conservation)

Simple Summary

Semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests are critical oak forest ecosystems in southwest China, yet the species diversity of acorn weevils and their relationship with host acorns are underexplored within this region. In this study, we identified the diversity of six acorn weevil species and their host plant preferences in the region using field surveys, laboratory observations, and molecular analysis. We found that while all dominant acorns were susceptible to weevil consumption, there were significant differences in weevil species diversity among various host acorns, except for Quercus franchetii. Moreover, the acorn volume and secondary metabolite content significantly influenced the species diversity of acorn weevil. These insights are instrumental for advancing seed–insect interaction studies and informing ecological management strategies in similar ecosystems.

Abstract

Acorn weevils critically impact forest regeneration in semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests (SEBFs) by parasitizing and consuming acorns before dispersal. Despite their ecological significance, research on the species diversity of acorn weevils within SEBFs remains limited. To address this gap, we assessed the species diversity and host affinity of acorn weevils across six dominant oak species at 18 locations. We performed DNA extraction and mitochondrial COI gene sequencing on weevil larvae and analyzed acorn functional traits (AFTs) from host acorns. Six acorn weevil species across four genera and two families were identified within the dominant acorns of SEBFs. Curculio dentipes showed the lowest host specificity, while Niphades castanea and Cyllorhynchites ursulus were specialist species. Notably, the species diversity of acorn weevils was significantly lower in Quercus franchetii than in others. Acorn volume and three secondary metabolite contents, including total phenols, total flavonoids, and tannins, were the primary AFTs influencing weevil species diversity. This study not only advances our comprehension of acorn weevil species diversity and their ecological interactions with oak hosts, but also provides valuable insights for the ecological management of SEBFs in southwest China.

1. Introduction

Insect parasitism and the consumption of pre-dispersal seeds are major causes of seed loss in many plants, exerting an important selection pressure on plant life histories [1,2]. This interaction between plant seeds and their parasites is crucial for the energy flow (i.e., the transfer of energy from one trophic level to another) and nutrient cycles in ecosystems, as well as for maintaining ecosystem function [3,4]. Understanding pre-dispersal predator–seed interactions can inform strategies to control pest populations. This, in turn, can promote plant regeneration and contribute to effective ecosystem management through targeted pest control measures and habitat restoration efforts [5,6].
Seed-parasitic insects, due to their high species diversity and broad host range, often have a significant impact on plant communities, especially on the survival, reproduction, and regeneration of plant communities that contain rare plants. [7,8]. Increasingly recognized as potential “pests”, these insects pose a threat to germination and seedling establishment in numerous plant species [9]. Their role in community composition and regeneration is pivotal, yet our understanding of their species diversity and host affinity remains limited due to challenges in accurately identifying closely related species, especially in their larval stages [10]. The accurate identification of seed-parasitic insects is crucial for understanding species composition and their interactions with host plants, which is essential for ecological research [11]. Traditional insect identification relies on adult morphological characteristics, as larvae are often indistinguishable, even among well-differentiated species [12,13]. Therefore, to elucidate the species diversity of the larval stages of seed-parasitic insects and to refine the estimation of their host ranges, the employment of DNA barcoding techniques is necessary for unambiguously discriminating among species [14,15]. This is not only crucial for sustaining forest ecosystems, but also vital for formulating restoration, management, and conservation strategies, as their interactions directly influence seed production and plant regeneration, which are fundamental to maintaining forest health [16].
Acorns, the distinctive seeds of oaks, play a key role in shaping the regeneration and succession of oak forests, as well as in maintaining the stability of the oak forest ecosystem [17,18,19]. Acorn functional traits (AFTs), as measurable individual-level characteristics, are crucial for insights into plant biology, conservation, resource utilization, and plant–animal interactions [20,21,22]. For instance, larger acorns with thinner pericarps are more accessible to insect larvae, providing them with ample space and nutrients for development [23,24,25]. Additionally, acorns with lower levels of secondary metabolites, such as tannins and phenols, are less defended and thus more palatable to insects [26]. These characteristics of acorns influence the foraging preferences of insect herbivores and play a crucial role in shaping the interactions between acorns and their insect predators. Acorn weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea), which are considered seed parasitoids, significantly impact this process by preying on acorns before they can disperse and germinate [27]. These weevils, such as species in the genus Curculio L. 1758, are known to lay their eggs within acorns, where the larvae develop and consume the seed tissue, often rendering the acorn non-viable for germination [27,28]. These progresses potentially reduce the acorn’s ability to grow into a new oak tree and ultimately affect forest regeneration [28]. In response to predation, acorns have evolved a suite of countermeasures to evade predation. These countermeasures include the production of secondary metabolites such as tannins and phenols, which can deter weevil larvae from feeding [29]. However, despite these defences, the impact of weevil predation remains significant, highlighting the complex interplay between acorn traits and insect behaviour in shaping forest ecosystems [3]. To better understand these complex interactions and their broader ecological implications, we focus our study on the semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests (SEBFs) of southwest China, where the unique combination of endemic oak species and frequent weevil activity provides a rich context for exploring these dynamics [30,31]. Despite their ecological significance, the species composition of these acorn weevils and their interactions with acorns within SEBFs have not been systematically studied [31,32,33]. This gap in the knowledge limits our ability to develop effective management strategies for these forests.
To address the research questions regarding the species composition and diversity of acorn weevils in SEBFs, their host range and specificity, and the relationship between AFTs and weevil diversity, we conducted extensive sampling and molecular analysis. Specifically, our goal was to test three hypotheses: (1) multiple species of acorn weevils are present and consume acorns in SEBFs; (2) these weevils show clear differences in their host range and specificity; and (3) AFTs affect the diversity of acorn weevils. Our findings could benefit the understanding of the interactions between host acorns and acorn weevils, which is crucial for forest management and biodiversity conservation in oak forests.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Area

Semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests (SEBFs), predominantly located in the Central Yunnan Plateau of southwest China, typically occur in fragmented patches within mountainous areas at elevations between 1500 and 2500 metres (Figure 1) [30]. Similarly to typical humid broad-leaved evergreen forests in East China, these forests are marked by oak species (Fagales: Fagaceae) that are either dominant or co-dominant within the arboreal stratum. However, SEBFs are characterized by the dominance of endemic species such as Quercus schottkyana (Rehder and E. H. Wilson, 1916), Q. delavayi (Franch., 1899), Lithocarpus dealbatus (Rehder, 1919), Castanopsis orthacantha (Franch., 1899), and C. delavayi (Franch., 1899), with the addition of Q. franchetii (Skan, 1899) in the semi-humid and warm regions [34].

2.2. Acorn and Weevil Sampling

To identify acorn weevils and their host plants, we sampled host acorns at 18 sites across the Central Yunnan Plateau (23.97–26.16° N, 101.05–104.18° E) during the acorn fall season (when the acorns were mature) in October to November of both 2022 and 2023. The sampling area encompassed the primary distribution area of SEBFs, and the sampled acorns were sourced from six dominant oak species in SEBFs (Figure 1, Table S1). During each sampling session, we randomly selected 3–5 oak mother trees (acorn-producing individuals) per site with a minimum distance of over 10 m between trees, and collected at least 50 mature acorns (including those fallen on to the ground and unshed ones on branches). To obtain more and accurate weevils from the acorns, we screened the collected acorns to ensure that there was no obvious damage or additional infestation. The collected acorns were separately stored in plastic boxes labelled based on site and oak species names. The boxes were tightly sealed to avoid cross-contamination and to prevent the adult insects from escaping after emergence. A total of 5948 acorns were collected for the sampling (Table S1).
All collected acorns were examined daily. We recorded and collected the number and date of weevil larvae and adults that naturally emerged from the acorns, continuing this process until the end of November. Acorns without signs of weevil larvae penetration were dissected, and those containing larvae were subsequently extracted and included in the experimental analysis. We classified all the weevil larvae by the collection sites and the host acorn species, then transferred them to pre-labelled 1.5 mL Eppendorf microcentrifuge tubes with absolute ethanol and stored them at −80 °C until use. A total of 229 larval individuals and four adult weevils were selected for the subsequent molecular work (Table 1), with 20–60 weevil individuals collected from each host plant species. All the collected samples were used for DNA extraction and sequencing.

2.3. Molecular Identification

The identification of adult weevils is often straightforward, based on morphological features, but this is not the case for larvae. Therefore, we utilized molecular identification to determine the species of larval weevils found in acorns. We extracted and sequenced DNA from a total of 229 larval weevils and four adult specimens (Table 1). DNA extraction was performed using the High Efficiency Animal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TSINGKE) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After extraction, polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were conducted with universal primers targeting the mitochondrial DNA gene COI: C1-J-2183, 5′-CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG-3′ and TL2-N-3014, 5′-TCCAATGCACTAATCTGCCATATTA-3′ [35]. The PCR system consisted of a 50 μL volume and was carried out under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min; 5 cycles (denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C for 40 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min); 35 cycles (denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 40 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min); and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified products were sequenced in both forward and reverse directions using the Sanger sequencing method on an ABI 3730xl automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). We compared the obtained sequences with a reference set of adult weevil sequences from China to identify the larval acorn weevils at the species level [2,36].

2.4. Measurement of Acorn Functional Traits

Referring to the functional trait classification by Jiménez-Alfaro et al. (2016) [22], we selected 50 sound acorns from different collection sites and species using a quadrat method to measure AFTs, which are categorized into morphological and physiological traits (Table S2). For morphological traits, we assessed five indicators: acorn mass, acorn volume, fruit shape index, pericarp thickness, and cicatrix thickness [37,38]. We measured the acorn mass with an analytical balance (BSA223S, OLABO, Jinan, Shandong, China). Digital vernier callipers (DELL, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China) were used to measure the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the acorns, and the fruit shape index was calculated using the following formula: F S I = L D / T D , where FSI is the fruit shape index, LD is the acorn’s longitudinal diameter, and TD is the acorn’s transverse diameter. Acorn volume was determined using the water displacement method, utilizing data on the acorns’ diameters (Table S3). After dissecting the pericarp with a scalpel, we measured the pericarp thickness and cicatrix thickness, which are physical defence characteristics, using a thickness gauge (SYNTEK, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China) (Figure S1). For physiological traits, we measured five indicators: water content, starch content (nutrients), and the content of three secondary metabolites (chemical defence substances): total phenols, total flavonoids, and tannins [39]. The water content of acorns was calculated using the following formula: W C = A C F A C D A C F × 100 % , where WC represents the water content of acorns, ACF is the fresh weight of acorns, and ACD is the dry weight of acorns [40]. Starch and the three secondary metabolites (total phenols, total flavonoids, and tannins) were extracted from the acorns using chemical kits from Suzhou Grace Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, Jiangsu, China), and their concentrations were analyzed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

2.5. Data Analysis

2.5.1. Weevil Species Identification

We compiled and reviewed the bidirectional sequencing data. If the electropherogram displayed a single, distinct peak, we conducted a Nucleotide BLAST search in the GenBank database to identify matches with published weevil sequences, and downloaded the homologous and outgroup sequences (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi/; accessed on 12 January 2024) (Table S4) [41]. We aligned all valid sequences and matching sequences in GenBank using the ClustalW programme within MEGA v11.0 (Mega Limited, Auckland, New Zealand) [42,43]. We then assessed the most appropriate nucleotide substitution models for the COI gene sequences of the weevils under study, selecting the optimal models based on the BIC and AIC criteria (Table S5) [44]. Based on these assessments, we chose the best-fit model for constructing a maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny and set the number of bootstrap replicates to 1000. Based on the available phylogenetic relationship studies of Curculionoidea, we selected Cylas formicarius (Fabricius, 1793) as an outgroup, searched for COI sequences of this species in GenBank and added them to the phylogenetic tree construction [45]. Tree visualization and refinement were performed using MEGA v11.0 and tvBOT web server (https://www.chiplot.online/tvbot.html; accessed on 30 January 2024) [46]. We calculated both intraspecific and interspecific genetic distances using the K2P (Kimura two-parameter) model with 1000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA v11.0.

2.5.2. Host Range and Specificity of the Acorn Weevils

To investigate the host range and specificity of acorn weevils feeding on dominant acorns in SEBFs, we documented the species and abundance of acorn weevils across various acorns, compiling a species-multiplicity data matrix. We employed the “circlize” and “statnet” packages in R 4.3.1 (https://www.r-project.org/; accessed on 12 March 2024) to visualize the correspondence between acorn weevils and their host acorns [47,48]. Additionally, parasitic insects exhibit selective preferences when choosing host plants, often utilizing only parts of the host, a phenomenon known as host specificity [49,50]. However, the count of species and genera that serve as hosts does not adequately measure the host specificity of acorn weevils. Instead, the host specificity score for each weevil species more accurately reflects the breadth of their host range. We determined the host specificity index for the acorn weevils in SEBFs using Hu’s method, represented by the following formula: S = 1 / a b 2 , where S is the host specificity of the weevil, a is the number of the host plant taxa at the species level, and b is the number at the genus level [41]. A weevil species parasitizing a single plant species exhibits a host specificity of 1, indicating the highest level of host specificity; conversely, an increase in the number of host plant species correlates with a decrease in host specificity. For the calculations and analyses, we classified weevils with hosts limited to a single genus as specialists, and those with hosts across different genera as generalists, thereby highlighting the variation in host specialization among acorn weevils [51].

2.5.3. Species Diversity of Acorn Weevils

We employed the “iNEXT” package to perform asymptotic diversity estimation based on Hill’s number q, using the statistical results from Section 2.5.1 and Section 2.5.2 as the data foundation to compare the species diversity of acorn weevil communities in different host acorns [52]. The model fits three diversity indices: species richness, Shannon–Wiener diversity, and Simpson diversity. Species richness (q = 0) focuses only on the presence or absence of species, counting species equally without regard to their relative abundance, with larger values indicating a greater abundance of species in the community. Shannon–Wiener diversity (q = 1) is estimated based on the proportional counts of species abundance and can be interpreted as an effective number of common species in the community. Simpson diversity (q = 2) is estimated based on dominant species counts to reflect the effective number of dominant species in the community. We estimated the species diversity of acorn weevils using 200 bootstrap resampling iterations with 95% confidence intervals, and the results were presented as rarefaction and extrapolation curves [53,54,55].

2.5.4. Effects of AFTs on the Diversity of Weevils

To determine whether the species diversity of the acorn weevil is significantly correlated with the host’s AFTs, we calculated the mean values of the AFTs (morphology and physiology) of the different hosts and correlated them with the species diversity indices of the acorn weevils (Table S6). We constructed a sample species dataset by treating each host as a sample, where the AFTs of the host act as proxies for the environmental factors within each sample (each row representing one sample and each column representing one environmental factor) [49]. The two datasets were analyzed using direct ordination to explore the relationships between species distributions and environmental factors. Specifically, the proportion of acorn weevil species diversity was explained by the AFTs of the host, and the amount and significance of each trait were explained by acorn weevil species diversity. We employed the “vegan” package in R 4.3.1 to perform detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) on the dataset matrix, and chose canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) to rank the AFTs factors. We applied the permutest function to conduct a Monte Carlo permutation test with the results of the CCA analyses, and subsequently used the envfit function to assess the significance of each AFT. Thus, we revealed the influence of AFTs of dominant host oaks in SEBFs on the species diversity of acorn weevils.

3. Results

3.1. Species Composition of the Acorn Weevil in SEBFs

We found weevil larvae in varying numbers across all six dominant acorns in the SEBFs. However, species identification based on morphology proved challenging (Figure 2 and Figure S2).
We conducted PCR amplification and sequencing on DNA samples from 233 acorn weevils collected from the six dominant acorns in SEBFs, resulting in 184 distinct and unambiguous COI sequences with no peak multiplicity. After splicing and proofreading, we obtained a 730 bp fragment sequence at the 5′-end. Phylogenetic tree construction revealed that all weevil species in SEBFs fell into six distinct genetic dendrograms, and that the test weevil sequences were matched to six species across two families and four genera. These included Curculio dentipes (Roelofs, 1874), C. davidi (Fairmaire, 1878), and C. bimaculatus (Marsham, 1802) from the genus Curculio in the family Curculionidae; Niphades castanea (Chao, 1980) from the genus Niphades Pascoe, 1871; Pimelocerus perforatus (Roelofs, 1873) from the genus Pimelocerus Roelofs, 1873; and Cyllorhynchites ursulus (Roelofs, 1874) from the genus Cyllorhynchites Voss, 1930 in the family Attelabidae (Figure 3A). The K2P genetic distance analysis among weevil species showed that the minimum inter-branch genetic distance (11.63%) was 0.5 times the maximum intra-branch genetic distance (21.15%). The average genetic distance between branches was 0.185, and the average genetic distance within branches was 6.48%. The genetic distances among the evolved branches of the three Curculio species ranged from 11.63% to 13.04%. N. castanea, P. perforatus, and Cyllorhynchites ursulus exhibited the largest genetic distances from other evolved branches, all exceeding 18%, with C. ursulus showing over 26% from other evolved branches (Table 2).

3.2. Host Range and Specificity of Weevils in SEBFs

The relationship between acorn weevils feeding on dominant acorns in SEBFs and their hosts showed considerable variation in host ranges among different acorn weevil species (Figure 3B, Table S7). Among the six acorn weevil species, Curculio dentipes had the highest individual count and the broadest host range, being able to consume six dominant acorn species in SEBFs. C. davidi feeds on five of these species, excluding Quercus franchetii. In contrast, C. bimaculatus and P. perforatus have more limited host ranges. C. bimaculatus only feeds on the two dominant acorns, Q. schottkyana and Castanopsis delavayi; P. perforatus only feeds on Lithorcarpus dealbatus and C. orthacantha. Niphades castanea and Curculio ursulus were the least abundant and had the most restricted host ranges. N. castanea only feeds on L. dealbatus, and Cyllorhynchites ursulus only on Q. schottkyana.
The host range and specificity analysis revealed that N. castanea and Cyllorhynchites ursulus were identified as host-specific species in this study, each exhibiting a host specificity index of one. This suggests high host specificity for both species within SEBFs. The remaining species were classified as generalists, with host specificity indices ranging from 0.14 to 0.35, with an average of 0.25, indicating low host specificity and a broad host range. Notably, Curculio dentipes, with the lowest host specificity index, corresponded to the broadest host range (Table 3).

3.3. Species Diversity of Acorn Weevils Within SEBFs

The species accumulation curve of acorn weevils in relation to the sample number indicated that the rarefaction curve initially exhibited logarithmic growth and subsequently displayed a distinct inflexion point. Upon reaching six weevil species, the curve became a plateau (Figure 3C). The findings suggested that the sampling of weevil larvae for this study was sufficiently comprehensive; thus, the likelihood of encountering additional weevil species by further increasing the number of acorn weevil samples in dominant acorns of SEBFs was minimal. Analysis using the iNEXT model of acorn weevil species diversity across different host acorns revealed that all three diversity indices were consistent among host plants in SEBFs, with Q. franchetii showing the lowest diversity index, and no significant differences observed in acorn weevil species diversity among the other host plants (Figure 4).

3.4. Effects of AFTs on Acorn Weevil Species Diversity

The correlation analysis between weevil species diversity and the AFTs of host acorns did not reveal any significant correlation between the species richness of acorn weevils and the AFTs of host acorns in SEBFs. However, Shannon–Wiener diversity showed a significant negative correlation with the total flavonoid content (R = −0.508, p < 0.05) and a significant positive correlation with the starch content (R = 0.446, p < 0.05). The Simpson diversity also showed a significant negative correlation with the pericarp thickness (R = −0.491, p < 0.05) and total flavonoid content (R = −0.471, p < 0.05), as well as tannin content (R = −0.471, p < 0.05), and a significant positive correlation with the starch content (R = 0.476, p < 0.05) (Table 4).
Based on the outcomes of DCA and the model selection criteria (where a single-peak model is selected if the longest axis in DCA exceeds 4), CCA was employed to rank the AFTs of host acorns affecting acorn weevil species diversity. The findings revealed that the ten AFTs of host acorns explained 23.9% of the total variance in acorn weevil species diversity. The combined variance explained by the first two axes represented 74.73% of the total trait variance, capturing most of the species trait information. Thus, the first two axes were selected for two-dimensional spatial ordination. The results demonstrated that the ten AFTs of host acorns significantly influenced acorn weevil species diversity (p = 0.007). Furthermore, among all AFT variables, the total flavonoids in physiological traits were the most influential, followed by tannins and the total phenolic content. Among morphological traits, the acorn volume significantly affected acorn weevil species diversity in acorns from the dominant oaks of SEBFs (Figure 5, Table S8).

4. Discussion

4.1. Species Composition of Weevils in SEBFs

The near-horizontal asymptote in the species rarefaction curve of weevils suggests that the six identified weevil species are representative of the diversity of weevils feeding on dominant acorns in SEBFs. Weevils are known for their extreme diversity and widespread distribution, and while numerous studies have been conducted, precise species numbers remain elusive [7,56]. Since 1980, studies have consistently revealed the presence of Curculio dentipes, C. davidi, and C. bimaculatus in chestnut-producing regions across Yunnan [56,57,58,59]. Our study corroborates these findings and extends them to include Cyllorhynchites ursulus feeding on additional Fagaceae species prevalent in central Yunnan, such as Quercus schottkyana and Q. franchetii [31,32,60,61]. This expands upon previous observations that these species primarily feed on chestnuts in Yunnan.
Additionally, our study, supported by existing research, has found that N. castanea preys on acorns of the genus Lithocarpus Blume, 1826, and extends these observations to include L. dealbatus, beyond the three Lithocarpus species (L. chintungensis, L. pachyphyllus var. fruticosus, and L. xylocarpus) in the Ailao Mountains, located in south-central Yunnan [62]. The complex host range of Pimelocerus perforatus includes species from families such as Rutaceae, Meliaceae, and Oleaceae [59,63]. This is particularly noteworthy, as this study documents a new record of P. perforatus parasitizing Fagaceae acorns.
Besides the species we mentioned, other studies have found that the weevil species that feed on Q. schottkyana also include Curculio megadens [31,33,64]. However, our study did not detect this species. This may be due to a lack of DNA sequences in GenBank or its classification within the same evolutionary branch as closely related species. Increasing genomic research on C. megadens is necessary for fully understanding the species composition of acorn weevils [45]. Additionally, compared to the studies by Li et al. (2006) and Chen et al. (2010), which included collections from both the tree–shrub–grass layers and the soil surface layer, reported higher species counts than our study focusing solely on acorn weevils [65,66]. Understanding the composition of acorn weevils in SEBFs is essential for developing effective management strategies, as these insects significantly impact oak regeneration.

4.2. Host Range and Specificity of Acorn Weevils

The coexistence of multiple oak species in SEBFs provides parasitic weevils with diverse acorn resources [67,68]. However, these weevils exhibit significant differences in host range and specificity. Curculio dentipes, with a broad host range, consumes the acorns of all six dominant oak species in SEBFs. Outside of the Yunnan region, C. dentipes often feeds on Q. mongolica, Q. acutissima, Q. variabilis, and Castanea mollissima, and coexists with other weevils; C. davidi has been recorded on 62 species of economic plants in four families, including the Quercus species [58,69,70,71,72]. Its broad feeding strategy aligns with temperate weevils’ low specialization, likely adapting to seasonal host resource fluctuations or weaker interspecific competition in temperate zones [73].
Curculio bimaculatus was initially recorded in Yunnan and Henan, and was often mixed with C. dentipes in Yunnan’s chestnut plantation areas [58]. However, 13 host species for C. bimaculatus in Zhejiang and eastern Fujian were discovered later, except chestnut [74,75]. Our study shows that the hosts of C. bimaculatus also include Q. schottkyana, C. delavayi, and L. dealbatus, and further surveys may reveal additional oak species as hosts. This suggests that C. bimaculatus is also a widespread generalist insect in oak forests with low host specificity. In contrast, tropical weevils usually show stricter host specificity (e.g., Nicaraguan weevils feed on only 1–2 oak species) [73]. The subtropical weevil community in this study is still dominated by generalists, possibly reflecting transitional host specialization along the latitudinal gradient.
In addition, P. perforatus, found in the acorns of L. dealbatus and Castanopsis orthacantha, is widely distributed, occurring in northern and southwestern China, as well as in Japan [76,77]. It has a wide host range and low host specificity, infesting branches of multiple family species. L. dealbatus and C. orthacantha, often multi-fruited in clusters, make them high host choices [78]. N. castanea has only been recorded eating some species of Castanea and Lithocarpus [62,79]. It is a specialist in feeding only on L. dealbatus in SEBFs, with a high level of host specificity. Cyllorhynchites ursulus mainly feeds on chestnuts in many places, but mostly on Q. schottkyana in SEBFs [31,33,80]. This strict host dependence is analogous to the “niche conservatism” of tropical weevils, suggesting that cases of local specialization still exist in subtropical forests [73]. Given the limited distribution of SEBFs, the survival of such weevils highly depends on the continuity of host plants, and may also be sensitive to habitat fragmentation [81].

4.3. Effects of AFTs on the Species Diversity of Weevils

In terms of morphological traits, the species diversity of acorn weevils decreases with increasing pericarp thickness. This variation is attributed to differences in pericarp thickness, weevil rostrum length, bite force (the mechanical force applied by the mouthparts during feeding), and the feeding preferences among acorn species [24,25]. Additionally, acorn volume (size) significantly impacts weevil diversity. From a reproductive point of view, adult females tend to lay their eggs in larger acorns, which apparently provide more nutritional support for larval development [23,82,83]. Muñoz et al. (2014) found that acorn size influences the body size of acorn weevils in the Mediterranean region. The weevils exhibited a degree of specificity between hosts, which was primarily driven by acorn size [2]. Consequently, to access more favourable nutrition, acorn weevils may prefer larger acorns with thinner pericarps during feeding and reproduction, potentially attracting a greater diversity of weevil species [73,84].
Acorn chemical defences significantly influenced the species diversity of acorn weevils [26]. Our study reveals a notable negative correlation between weevil diversity and the chemical defences of their host acorns. Early research indicates that some phytophagous insects secrete specific defence elicitors, such as fatty acid conjugates (FACs), which can provoke a defensive response in plants [85]. The egg-laying behaviour of parasitic insects can also trigger host plant defences. For example, when Callosobruchus maculatus and Bruchus pisorum lay their eggs, the host peas recognize signalling material on the eggs and form pod tissues, preventing newly hatched weevil larvae from entering the pods [86]. Furthermore, some plants synthesize tannins in response to insect damage, which limits the synthesis of midgut proteins and digestive enzymes, ultimately restricting insect growth and development [29,87]. Consequently, high chemical defences in acorns may reduce their palatability, decreasing feeding by acorn weevils and, in turn, their species diversity.
Insects have developed various adaptations to counter plant defences, and the most common is resistance to secondary metabolites [88]. For example, Salvia ceratophylloides Ard. produces essential oils, yet does not effectively resist the parasitism of Squamapion elongatum (Germar,1817) (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea, and Apionidae), which may be related to S. elongatum’s counteradaptation to the defensive mechanisms of host plant [8]. The presence of Serratia marcescens and Lactococcus lactis with tannase activity in the gut flora of Curculio dentipes aids in the uptake of high-tannin foods, potentially explaining the ability of some weevil larvae to adapt to high-tannin diets [89]. Generally, acorns with high levels of secondary metabolites deter feeding by less defended weevils, reducing acorn weevil species diversity. Acorn weevils have evolved defensive mechanisms to better cope with these defences, enhancing their survival chances. This continuous interplay of defence, evasion, and co-adaptation between the species in an ‘arms race’ for survival enriches and expands the diversity of their populations.

5. Conclusions

In the semi-humid evergreen broad-leaved forests of southwest China, six acorn weevil species across four genera and two families were identified with the aid of molecular techniques. These included Curculio dentipes, C. davidi, C. bimaculatus, Niphades castanea, and Pimelocerus perforatus of the family Curculionidae, and Cyllorhynchites ursulus of the family Attelabidae. These species exhibited varying degrees of host specificity, with some showing broad host ranges and others being highly host specific. Notably, no significant differences in the species diversity of acorn weevils were observed among the dominant acorns, except for Quercus franchetii. However, acorn functional traits significantly influenced the species diversity of acorn weevils, including host acorn volume and secondary metabolite contents such as total phenols, total flavonoids, and tannins. Our results provide a foundation for further research into the mechanisms driving these interactions and their broader ecological implications, which are crucial for the ecological management and biodiversity conservation of similar forests.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects16060579/s1. Table S1: acorn sampling data and sample counts from dominant host oaks in SEBFs; Table S2: acorn functional traits and their ecological roles in oak species; Table S3: the volume fitting formula for acorns of different oak species; Table S4: detailed taxonomic resources used in present study; Table S5: optimal nucleotide substitution model for maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees; Table S6: functional trait values of acorns from dominant oak species in SEBFs; Table S7: the number of acorns consumed by acorn weevils of different species; Table S8: correlation coefficient and significance level between AFTs of host and acorn weevil species diversity; Figure S1: examples of morphometric measurements of acorns; Figure S2: morphology of acorns from dominant oak species and their state following weevil parasitism in SEBFs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.F. and C.W.; methodology, S.F. and C.W.; software, S.F. and C.L.; validation, S.F., M.P. and C.W.; formal analysis, S.H., M.P., Y.L. and C.W.; investigation, S.F., C.L., X.L., B.Z., D.C., Z.W. and M.G.; resources, M.P. and C.W.; data curation, S.F., C.L., X.L., B.Z., D.C., Z.W. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.F., Y.L., S.H. and C.W.; writing—review and editing, S.F., Y.L., S.H. and C.W.; visualization, S.F.; supervision, M.P., Y.L., S.H. and C.W.; project administration, C.W.; funding acquisition, C.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the major project of Yunnan Province Basic Research Program (Grant No. 202101BC070002) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant No. 32360331).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would especially like to thank Wenhua Su (Yunnan University), Zhaolu Wu (Yunnan University), and Youxin Ma (Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for their valuable suggestions for this study. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Heyes, S.; Morgan, J.; Sinclair, S.; Walker, Z.; Hoebee, S. Pre-dispersal seed-predation affects fruit crop and seed fitness in a highly fragmented savanna tree. Aust. J. Bot. 2023, 71, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Muñoz, A.; Bonal, R.; Espelta, J.M. Acorn-weevil interactions in a mixed-oak forest: Outcomes for larval growth and plant recruitment. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 322, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, X.; Luo, Y.; Wang, R.; Du, F.K. The distinct fruit size and physical defense promote divergent secondary seed dispersal strategies of three oak species. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 529, 120642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Chen, X.; Niklas, K.J.; Sun, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhong, Q.; Hu, D.; Cheng, D. A whole-plant economics spectrum including bark functional traits for 59 subtropical woody plant species. J. Ecol. 2022, 110, 248–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jackson, E.E.; Wright, S.J.; Calderón, O.; Bullock, J.M.; Oliver, T.; Gripenberg, S. Pre-dispersal seed predation could help explain premature fruit drop in a tropical forest. J. Ecol. 2022, 110, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kurek, P.; Dobrowolska, D.; Wiatrowska, B.; Seget, B.; Piechnik, Ł. Low rate of pre-dispersal acorn predation by Eurasian Jays Garrulus glandarius during Non-Mast Years. Acta Ornithol. 2023, 57, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shmida, A.; Wilson, M. Biological determinants of species diversity. J. Biogeogr. 1985, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bonsignore, C.P.; Laface, V.L.; Vono, G.; Marullo, R.; Musarella, C.M.; Spampinato, G. Threats posed to the rediscovered and rare Salvia ceratophylloides Ard. (Lamiaceae) by borer and seed feeder insect species. Diversity 2021, 13, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Auld, T. Patterns of predispersal seed predators in the Fabaceae of the Sydney region, South-Eastern Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 1991, 39, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schütte, A.; Stüben, P.E.; Astrin, J.A.-O. Molecular Weevil Identification Project: A thoroughly curated barcode release of 1300 Western Palearctic weevil species (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea). Biodivers. Data J. 2023, 24, e96438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, X.; Nie, P.; Hu, X.; Feng, J. A host tree and its specialist insects: Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) availability largely determines the future range dynamics of its specialist insects in Europe. Insects 2024, 15, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kajtoch, Ł.; Montagna, M.; Wanat, M. Species delimitation within the Bothryorrhynchapion weevils: Multiple evidence from genetics, morphology and ecological associations. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018, 120, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Marvaldi, A.E.; Sequeira, A.S.; O’Brien, C.W.; Farrell, B.D. Molecular and morphological phylogenetics of weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea): Do niche shifts accompany diversification? Syst. Biol. 2002, 51, 761–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bocak, L.; Barton, C.; Crampton-Platt, A.; Chesters, D.; Ahrens, D.; Vogler, A.P. Building the Coleoptera tree-of-life for >8000 species: Composition of public DNA data and fit with Linnaean classification. Syst. Entomol. 2014, 39, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sequeira, A.S.; Sijapati, M.; Lanteri, A.A.; Roque Albelo, L. Nuclear and mitochondrial sequences confirm complex colonization patterns and clear species boundaries for flightless weevils in the Galápagos archipelago. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2008, 363, 3439–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Figueroa, C.C.; Niemeyer, H.M.; Cabrera-Brandt, M.; Briones, L.M.; Lavandero, B.; Zúñiga-Reinoso, A.; Ramírez, C.C. Forest fragmentation may endanger a plant-insect interaction: The case of the highly specialist native aphid Neuquenaphis staryi in Chile. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2018, 11, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Malav, P.; Pandey, A.; Bhatt, K.; Krishnan, S.; Bisht, I. Morphological variability in holy basil (Ocimum tenuiflorum L.) from India. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2015, 62, 1245–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Méndez-Tovar, I.; Martín, H.; Santiago, Y.; Ibeas, A.; Herrero, B.; Asensio-S.-Manzanera, M.C. Variation in morphological traits among Thymus mastichina (L.) L. populations. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2015, 62, 1257–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Willis, C.G.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Auld, J.R.; Venable, D.L.; Cavender-Bares, J.; Donohue, K.; Rubio de Casas, R.; Group, T.N.G.W. The evolution of seed dormancy: Environmental cues, evolutionary hubs, and diversification of the seed plants. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Amartuvshin, N.; Hülber, K.; Plutzar, C.; Tserenbaljid, G. Functional traits but not environmental gradients explain seed weight in Mongolian plant species. Plant Biol. 2018, 21, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fricke, E.; Wright, S.J. The mechanical defence advantage of small seeds. Ecol. Lett. 2016, 19, 987–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jiménez-Alfaro, B.; Silveira, F.; Fidelis, A.; Poschlod, P.; Commander, L. Seed germination traits can contribute better to plant community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 2016, 27, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Du, B.M.; Jun, Y.; Ji, H.W.; Yin, S.; Kang, H.Z.; Liu, C.J. Body size plasticity of weevil larvae (Curculio davidi) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its stoichiometric relationship with different hosts. J. Insect Sci. 2021, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Iseki, N.; Sasaki, A.; Toju, H. Arms race between weevil rostrum length and camellia pericarp thickness: Geographical cline and theory. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 285, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rühr, P.T.; Edel, C.; Frenzel, M.; Blanke, A. A bite force database of 654 insect species. Sci. Data 2024, 11, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Williams, J.P.; Hawkins, T.S. Acorn weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) predation dynamics in a Mississippi bottomland hardwood forest. Castanea 2020, 85, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, W. State and phase transition behaviors of Quercus rubra seed axes and cotyledonary tissues: Relevance to the desiccation sensitivity and cryopreservation of recalcitrant seeds. Cryobiology 1999, 38, 372–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cho, G.; Kim, Y.J.; Jeon, K.; Joo, H.J.; Kang, K.S. Accuracy evaluation of visible-near infrared spectroscopy for detecting insect damage in acorns of Quercus acuta. Silvae Genet. 2024, 73, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fürstenberg-Hägg, J.; Zagrobelny, M.; Bak, S. Plant defense against insect herbivores. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 10242–10297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Z.Y.; Zhu, Y.C. Vegetation in Yunnan; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, C.Y.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, Z.Y.; He, Z.R.; Li, X.S. Parasitism in acorns of Cyclobalanopsis glaucoides and Castanopsis delavayi (Fagaceae) and its impact on population regeneration. Plant Divers. Resour. 2014, 36, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xia, K.; Harrower, W.L.; Turkington, R.; Tan, H.Y.; Zhou, Z.K. Pre-dispersal strategies by Quercus schottkyana to mitigate the effects of weevil infestation of acorns. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xiao, R.D. Biological Habits of Curculio Megadens and Its Adaptive Evolution against Host Plant Defense; Yunnan University: Kunming, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhu, H.; Tan, Y. Flora and vegetation of Yunnan, Southwestern China: Diversity, origin and evolution. Diversity 2022, 14, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Simon, C.; Frati, F.; Beckenbach, A.; Crespi, B.; Liu, H.; Flook, P. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1994, 87, 651–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hughes, J.; Vogler, A.P. Ecomorphological adaptation of acorn weevils to their oviposition site. Evolution 2004, 58, 1971–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liu, Y.; Hou, L.Y.; Li, Q.M. Effects of different mechanical treatments on Quercus variabilis, Q. wutaishanica and Q. robur acorn germination. iForest 2015, 8, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Woziwoda, B.; Gręda, A.; Frelich, L.E. High acorn diversity of the introduced Quercus rubra indicates its ability to spread efficiently in the new range. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 146, 109884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shimada, T.; Saitoh, T. Re-evaluation of the relationship between rodent populations and acorn masting: A review from the aspect of nutrients and defensive chemicals in acorns. Popul. Ecol. 2006, 48, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, J.C.; Wu, Y.Y.; Zhu, J.L.; Sun, Y.Y.; Feng, J.; Jiang, Z.P.; Shi, S.Q. Comparison and comprehensive evaluation of acorn qualities of Quercus and Castanopsis from different provenances. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2022, 44, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, X.H.; Ren, L.I.; Chen, X.Y. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for acorn weevil Curculio bimaculatus Faust (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Genet. 2016, 93, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wünschiers, R. Installing BLAST and Clustal W.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Q.; Charleston, M.A.; Richards, S.A.; Holland, B.R. Performance of akaike information criterion and bayesian information criterion in selecting partition models and mixture models. Syst. Biol. 2023, 72, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, Y.D.; Engel, M.S.; Tihelka, E.; Cai, C.Y. Phylogenomics of weevils revisited: Data curation and modelling compositional heterogeneity. Biol. Lett. 2023, 19, 20230307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xie, J.M.; Chen, Y.R.; Cai, G.J.; Cai, R.L.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H. Tree visualization by one table (tvBOT): A web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gu, Z.G.; Gu, L.; Eils, R.; Schlesner, M.; Brors, B. Circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2811–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Handcock, M.S.; Hunter, D.R.; Butts, C.T.; Goodreau, S.M.; Morris, M. statnet: Software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. J. Stat. Softw. 2008, 24, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, Y.J.; Zhang, L. Preliminary studies on effects of host functional traits on host specificity of Mistletoe species. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot. 2019, 27, 187–195. [Google Scholar]
  50. Thompson, J.N. Variation in preference and specificity in monophagous and oligophagous swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 1988, 42, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aoki, K.; Kato, M.; Murakami, N. Phylogeographical patterns of a generalist acorn weevil: Insight into the biogeographical history of broadleaved deciduous and evergreen forests. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hsieh, T.C.; Ma, K.H.; Chao, A. iNEXT: An R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016, 7, 1451–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chao, A.; Kubota, Y.; Zelený, D.; Chiu, C.H.; Li, C.F.; Kusumoto, B.; Yasuhara, M.; Thorn, S.; Wei, C.L.; Costello, M.J.; et al. Quantifying sample completeness and comparing diversities among assemblages. Ecol. Res. 2020, 35, 292–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fang, S.Q.; Li, Y.P.; Pan, Y.; Wang, C.Y.; Peng, M.C.; Hu, S.J. Butterfly diversity in a rapidly developing urban area: A case study on a university campus. Diversity 2024, 16, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yi, L.; Dong, Y.; Miao, B.G.; Peng, Y.Q. Diversity of butterfly communities in Gaoligong region of Yunnan. Biodivers. Sci. 2021, 29, 950–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhao, Y.; Gao, X.Y.; Xiao, C. Advance of weevils host selection behavior research. J. Agric. Catastrophol. 2014, 4, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, Y.M. List of pests to Chinese chestnut in Yunnan and brief introduction on the main pests. J. West China For. Sci. 1997, 3, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lu, M.R.; Li, Z.Y.; SUn, Y.X. Survey of beetle pests of Yunnan chestnut and their natural enemies. Chin. Res. Appl. Entomopathog. Fungi 2003, 5, 175. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhao, Y.C. Economic Insects of China, Volume 20: Coleoptera, Curculionidae (I); Science Press: Beijing, China, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Hou, X.; Chen, X.N.; Han, N.; Chang, G. Seed production and seed size and their relationship with insect infestation in Quercus glandulifera and Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata in the south slopes of the Qinling Mountains. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2015, 58, 1307–1314. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang, Z.Y.; Li, W.; Huang, Q.C.; Yang, L.; Chen, X.L.; Xiao, R.D.; Tang, C.Q.; Hu, S.J. Cut to Disarm Plant Defence: A Unique Oviposition Behaviour in Rhynchites foveipennis (Coleoptera: Attelabidae). Insects 2023, 14, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, D. Seed predation and Seed Dispersal of Common Lithocarpus Species by Insects and Rodents in the Ailao Mountain; Yunnan Normal University: Kunming, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  63. Xue, Z.; Feng, S.K.; Zhang, C.L.; Lu, X.L.; Feng, M.; Wang, H.; Yu, G.Y. Pimelocerus perforatus (Roelofs) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a new pest of the green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica found in Beijing. Plant Prot. 2018, 44, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pelsue, F.; Zhang, R. A Review of the Genus Curculio from China with Descriptions of Fourteen New Species. Part IV. The Curculio sikkimensis (Heller) Group (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Curculioninae: Curculionini). Coleopt. Bull. 2003, 57, 311–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, Q.; Chen, Y.Q.; Li, C.F.; Feng, Y.G.; Li, Q.Y.; Zhao, Z.H. A primary study on weevil diversity in arid-hot valleys, Yuanmou, Yunnan. J. Northwest For. Univ. 2006, 21, 103–107. [Google Scholar]
  66. Chen, Y.Q.; Li, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, Y.H.; Wang, S.Y.; Wang, S.M. Diversity of Curculionoidea in subtropical monsoon evergreen broadleaved forest in Puer City, Yunnan. J. Yunnan Univ. 2010, 32, 97–102. [Google Scholar]
  67. Daza, A.; López-Bote, C.J.; Tomás Barberán, F.A.; Espin, J.C.; López Carrasco, C.; Olivares, A.; Rey, A.I. Effect of mediterranean forest parasite with Curculio sp. on nutritional value of acorn for Iberian pig feeding and fat characteristics. Meat Sci. 2007, 76, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Houshmand, M.; Hojati, F.; Parsaie, S. Dietary nutrient manipulation to improve the performance and tibia characteristics of broilers fed oak acorn (Quercus Brantii Lindl). Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2015, 17, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jr, F.W.P. A review of the genus Curculio from China with descriptions of four new taxa. Part V. The Curculio dentipes (Roelofs) Group (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Curculionini). Coleopt. Bull. 2009, 59, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, C.S.; Han, Y.H.; Niu, H.; Li, L.Y.; Gao, W.T.; Meng, Q.F. The relationship between Curculio dentipes larva and acorn. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2017, 45, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Han, Y.H.; Meng, X.; You, S.J.; Chen, Y.B.; Liu, S.M.; Wang, C.S.; Gao, W.T.; Meng, Q.F. Biological characteristics of Curculio dentipes in Jilin City, Jilin Province. J. Northeast. For. Univ. 2018, 46, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hao, Z.Y.; Guo, Y.D.; He, J.L.; He, H.; Yang, K.L. Relationship between Curculio davidi damage and physical characters of different Castanea mollissima varieties. J. Northwest A F Univ. 2024, 52, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Peguero, G.; Bonal, R.; Sol, D.; Muñoz, A.; Sork, V.; Espelta, J. Tropical insect diversity: Evidence of greater host specialization in seed-feeding weevils. Ecology 2017, 98, 2180–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Du, X.K. Population Genetic Structure and Gene Flow of Curculio Bimaculatus in Fragmented Habitats; East China Normal Univeristy: Shanghai, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hu, X.H. Host Related Species Diversification and Population Genetic Diversity of Acorn Weevils; East China Normal Univeristy: Shanghai, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  76. Xiao, G.R.; Li, Z.Y. Chinese Forest Insects, 3rd ed.; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  77. Yoshida, K.; Matsuda, H.; Tokuda, M. Laboratory rearing and developmental traits of olive weevil, Pimelocerus perforatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), using an artificial diet. Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2018, 62, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mitsumoto, A.; Yamazaki, T. Repellent Activity of Vanillin Derivatives and Monoterpenes to Olive Weevil. J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 2022, 142, 1005–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xiao, Y.L.; Zhang, F.; Xu, Y.X.; Zhong, Y.L. Discrimination of two chestnut fruit border weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Plant Prot. 2017, 43, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wang, X.; Hu, S.J.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Geng, Y.P.; Bai, X. Oviposition preference and offspring performance of Mechoris ursulus (Coleoptera: Attelabidae) in Cyclobalanopsis glaucoides (Fagales: Fagaceae) and Quercus franchetii (Fagales: Fagaceae) in Central Yunnan, China. J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bonal, R.; Espelta, J.; Muñoz, A.; Ortego, J.; Aparicio, J.; Gaddis, K.; Sork, V. Diversity in insect seed parasite guilds at large geographical scale: The roles of host specificity and spatial distance. J. Biogeogr. 2016, 43, 1620–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ji, H.W.; Du, B.M.; Liu, C.J. Elemental stoichiometry and compositions of weevil larvae and two acorn hosts under natural phosphorus variation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kaushal, B.; Pant, M.; Kalia, S.; Joshi, R.; Bora, R. Aspects of the biology and control of three species of acorn weevils infesting oak acorns in Kumaun Himalaya. J. Appl. Entomol. 1993, 115, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Halpern, A.; Sousa, W.; Lake, F.; Carlson, T.; Paddock, W. Prescribed fire reduces insect infestation in Karuk and Yurok acorn resource systems. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 505, 119768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Howe, G.A.; Jander, G. Plant Immunity to Insect Herbivores. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yu, H.X.; Ye, W.F.; Sun, M.Q.; Xu, N.; Lou, S.Z.; Ran, J.X.; Lou, Y.G. Three levels of defense and anti-defense responses between host plants and herbivorous insects. Chin. J. Ecol. 2015, 34, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Peters, D.J.; Constabel, C.P. Molecular analysis of herbivore-induced condensed tannin synthesis: Cloning and expression of dihydroflavonol reductase from trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides). Plant J. 2002, 32, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mohamed, M.; Ghazy, A.-E.; Abdel Karim, G.; El-khonezy, M.; Abd-Elaziz, A.; Ghanem, M. Defense status in larval stage of red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 44, 102465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Guo, S.H.; Yi, X.F. Gut bacterial composition of two Curculio species and their adaptation to high-tannin food. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2019, 59, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Host acorn sampling site distribution and field conditions in Central Yunnan Plateau. (A) Different symbols represent various host acorn sampling sites; (B) mature acorns of Quercus schottkyana, with some detached from their cupules; (C) Castanopsis orthacantha acorns enclosed in cupules on branches; and (D) C. delavayi acorns on the ground, predominantly enclosed in their cupules.
Figure 1. Host acorn sampling site distribution and field conditions in Central Yunnan Plateau. (A) Different symbols represent various host acorn sampling sites; (B) mature acorns of Quercus schottkyana, with some detached from their cupules; (C) Castanopsis orthacantha acorns enclosed in cupules on branches; and (D) C. delavayi acorns on the ground, predominantly enclosed in their cupules.
Insects 16 00579 g001
Figure 2. Status of weevil larvae within the acorn on the verge of boring out and those remaining inside. (A) Weevil larvae in Q. schottkyana biting through the pericarp for emergence; (B) weevil larvae in L. dealbatus emerging from the cupule at the cicatrix; (C) weevil larvae within C. delavayi that have not yet bored out; and (D) weevil larvae in Q. schottkyana that have emerged simultaneously in large numbers.
Figure 2. Status of weevil larvae within the acorn on the verge of boring out and those remaining inside. (A) Weevil larvae in Q. schottkyana biting through the pericarp for emergence; (B) weevil larvae in L. dealbatus emerging from the cupule at the cicatrix; (C) weevil larvae within C. delavayi that have not yet bored out; and (D) weevil larvae in Q. schottkyana that have emerged simultaneously in large numbers.
Insects 16 00579 g002
Figure 3. (A) Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of weevils based on COI DNA barcode sequences, with Cylas formicarius as the outgroup. Circles at nodes indicate the bootstrap values with 1000 iterations. Leaf node labels denote “larva/adult-host acorn-collection site-sample number”. Different colours denote weevil samples grouped by species. (B) Feeding relationships between host acorns and acorn weevils, with links indicating the presence of weevil species within specific acorns. Link width represents the number of weevils sampled per acorn species. The numbers in upper half circle indicate individual counts per weevil species; lower half numbers indicate counts per acorn species. (C) Species richness of acorn weevils plotted against acorn number using a sparse curve.
Figure 3. (A) Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of weevils based on COI DNA barcode sequences, with Cylas formicarius as the outgroup. Circles at nodes indicate the bootstrap values with 1000 iterations. Leaf node labels denote “larva/adult-host acorn-collection site-sample number”. Different colours denote weevil samples grouped by species. (B) Feeding relationships between host acorns and acorn weevils, with links indicating the presence of weevil species within specific acorns. Link width represents the number of weevils sampled per acorn species. The numbers in upper half circle indicate individual counts per weevil species; lower half numbers indicate counts per acorn species. (C) Species richness of acorn weevils plotted against acorn number using a sparse curve.
Insects 16 00579 g003
Figure 4. Sparse extrapolation curves show species diversity of acorn weevils in dominant acorns within SEBFs. Curves are plotted against sample number, with shaded areas indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Overlapping confidence intervals suggest no statistically significant differences in diversity indices among the species. (AC) represent species richness, Shannon–Wiener diversity, and Simpson diversity, respectively.
Figure 4. Sparse extrapolation curves show species diversity of acorn weevils in dominant acorns within SEBFs. Curves are plotted against sample number, with shaded areas indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Overlapping confidence intervals suggest no statistically significant differences in diversity indices among the species. (AC) represent species richness, Shannon–Wiener diversity, and Simpson diversity, respectively.
Insects 16 00579 g004
Figure 5. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of AFTs of host acorns and species diversity of acorn weevils, including (A) the CCA plot and (B) the explanatory power of functional traits to species diversity of acorn weevils. In the CCA plot, different coloured points represent distinct host acorns, arrows from the origin indicate various acorn traits, and red arrows highlight significant trait factors in explaining weevil diversity. Traits marked with an asterisk in the bar graph indicate statistically significant differences.
Figure 5. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of AFTs of host acorns and species diversity of acorn weevils, including (A) the CCA plot and (B) the explanatory power of functional traits to species diversity of acorn weevils. In the CCA plot, different coloured points represent distinct host acorns, arrows from the origin indicate various acorn traits, and red arrows highlight significant trait factors in explaining weevil diversity. Traits marked with an asterisk in the bar graph indicate statistically significant differences.
Insects 16 00579 g005
Table 1. Sampling information of weevils used for molecular work.
Table 1. Sampling information of weevils used for molecular work.
Host SpeciesLocalityNo. of WeevilsTotal
Castanopsis delavayiXishan, Kunming1157
Huaning, Yuxi3
Yao’an, Chuxiong43
C. orthacanthaXinping, Yuxi1242
Zixi, Chuxiong5
Yao’an, Chuxiong25
Lithocarpus dealbatusLuoping, Qujing13 (2) *36
Xishan, Kunming4
Lufeng, Chuxiong17
Quercus delavayiLuquan, Kunming1140
Luquan, Kunming13
Yao’an, Chuxiong16
Q. franchetiiBinchuan, Dali1522
E’shan, Yuxi5
Xishan, Kunming2
Q. schottkyanaXishan, Kunming12 (2) *36
Yao’an, Chuxiong13
Yongren, Chuxiong11
Note: The column of “locality” indicates “county/township, municipality”; * number of adult weevils in parentheses.
Table 2. Kimura two-parameter (K2P) distances (in percentages) between all acorn weevil taxa calculated from the DNA barcode sequences (COI), with species identified as in the ML phylogenetic tree in Figure 3A.
Table 2. Kimura two-parameter (K2P) distances (in percentages) between all acorn weevil taxa calculated from the DNA barcode sequences (COI), with species identified as in the ML phylogenetic tree in Figure 3A.
123456
1. Curculio dentipes8.50
2. C. davidi11.636.70
3. C. bimaculatus12.1813.042.83
4. Niphades castanea20.3919.8518.404.38
5. Pimelocerus perforatus21.9621.6020.9120.1215.03
6. Cyllorhynchites ursulus26.8527.2227.1926.2329.741.41
Table 3. The host range and specificity of weevil species feeding on dominant acorns in SEBFs.
Table 3. The host range and specificity of weevil species feeding on dominant acorns in SEBFs.
Species of WeevilNo. of
Host Species
No. of
Host Genus
Host
Specificity (S)
Generalist
species
Curculio davidi5.003.000.15
C. dentipes6.003.000.14
C. bimaculatus2.002.000.35
Pimelocerus perforatus2.002.000.35
Average3.752.500.25
Host-specific
species
Niphades castanea1.001.001.00
Cyllorhynchites ursulus1.001.001.00
Average1.001.001.00
Table 4. Correlation between acorn weevil species diversity and AFTs of host acorn within SEBFs.
Table 4. Correlation between acorn weevil species diversity and AFTs of host acorn within SEBFs.
Trait VariableSpecies
Richness
Shannon–Wiener
Diversity
Simpson
Diversity
Morphological traitsAcorn mass−0.05−0.15−0.23
Fruit shape index0.350.350.30
Volume0.080.180.05
Pericarp thickness−0.38−0.32−0.49 *
Cicatrix thickness0.180.140.04
Physiological traitsMoisture0.13−0.040.04
Total phenols−0.41−0.20−0.43
Total flavonoids−0.42−0.51 *−0.47 *
Tannins−0.40−0.41−0.47 *
Starch0.370.45 *0.48 *
Note: * p < 0.05, the difference is significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, S.; Hu, S.; Zhao, B.; Chen, D.; Lan, C.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Peng, M.; Wang, Z.; Ge, M.; et al. Acorn Weevil Species Diversity and Host Affinity in the Semi-Humid Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forests of Southwest China. Insects 2025, 16, 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060579

AMA Style

Fang S, Hu S, Zhao B, Chen D, Lan C, Li X, Li Y, Peng M, Wang Z, Ge M, et al. Acorn Weevil Species Diversity and Host Affinity in the Semi-Humid Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forests of Southwest China. Insects. 2025; 16(6):579. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Shengquan, Shaoji Hu, Biao Zhao, Dengpeng Chen, Chunyan Lan, Xinrong Li, Yongping Li, Mingchun Peng, Zihao Wang, Mingyu Ge, and et al. 2025. "Acorn Weevil Species Diversity and Host Affinity in the Semi-Humid Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forests of Southwest China" Insects 16, no. 6: 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060579

APA Style

Fang, S., Hu, S., Zhao, B., Chen, D., Lan, C., Li, X., Li, Y., Peng, M., Wang, Z., Ge, M., & Wang, C. (2025). Acorn Weevil Species Diversity and Host Affinity in the Semi-Humid Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forests of Southwest China. Insects, 16(6), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop