Next Article in Journal
From a Food Safety Prospective: The Role of Earthworms as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security and in Valuing Food Waste
Previous Article in Journal
Probing the Honey Bee Diet-Microbiota-Host Axis Using Pollen Restriction and Organic Acid Feeding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Life History Evaluation of Ooencyrtus lucidus, a Newly Described Egg Parasitoid of Bagrada hilaris

by
Fatemeh Ganjisaffar
* and
Thomas M. Perring
Department of Entomology, University of California, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2020, 11(5), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050292
Submission received: 14 April 2020 / Revised: 3 May 2020 / Accepted: 6 May 2020 / Published: 9 May 2020

Abstract

:
Ooencyrtus lucidus Triapitsyn & Ganjisaffar (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) was recently recovered from fresh sentinel eggs of Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in California. In the present study, life history traits of O. lucidus were studied at 26 ± 0.5 °C, 40 ± 10 % RH, and a photoperiod of 14 L: 10 D hours. Results showed that 95.2% of the parasitized eggs yielded successful emergence of adults. The total immature developmental time was 14.27 and 13.95 days for females and males, respectively. The sex ratio of O. lucidus was 0.5 (females/offspring). Mated females laid on average 6.0 eggs per day and 222.7 eggs during their mean ovipositional period of 37.3 days. There was no significant difference in reproduction parameters between mated and non-mated females. The net reproductive rate ( R 0 ) was 103.8 females/female/generation, the intrinsic rate of increase ( r m ) was 0.171 females/female/day, the finite rate of increase ( λ ) was 1.187 population multiplication/day, the mean generation time (T) was 27.1 days, and the doubling time (DT) was 4.0 days. The highest longevity was observed in mated and non-mated females fed with honey, and they lived for 70.8 and 70.1 days, respectively. Providing females with host eggs in addition to honey, reduced their longevity by 24% in mated and 28% in non-mated individuals. Non-mated females and males deprived of honey only lived for 3.5 and 2.5 days after emergence, respectively. Our results indicate that O. lucidus has sufficient life history traits to make it a promising egg parasitoid for the biological control of B. hilaris.

1. Introduction

Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), a stink bug native to Africa, Asia, and the Middle East [1,2], has invaded and colonized numerous regions of the world with serious damage to plants in the mustard family (Brassicaceae) [3,4]. These bugs are extremely damaging to young seedlings, but they also feed on leaves, stems, flowers, and the seeds of older plants [5,6]. Bagrada hilaris was accidentally introduced into California in 2008 [7], and by 2015 had spread significantly across the west coast of the United States [4,5,8,9,10,11]. In Mexico, B. hilaris was first reported in 2014 from the states of Saltillo and southeastern Coahuila causing economic damage to cole crops [12] and it reached the state of Guanajuato in 2017 [13]. This stink bug was introduced into Santiago, Chile in 2016 [14] and reports from Chile indicate that it is in the spreading stage of invasion [15,16].
Chemical applications have been the main approach against B. hilaris [4,17]. However, considerable efforts are underway to utilize biological control as part of the strategy to maintain pest populations below economic thresholds. These efforts include research on exotic natural enemies as classical biological control agents for B. hilaris [18,19] and investigations of native or introduced natural enemies associated with this pest in the field. To date, the adventive Trissolcus hyalinipennis Rajmohana & Narendran and the intentionally introduced Trissolcus basalis (Wollaston) (both Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea: Scelionidae) have been recovered from fresh sentinel eggs of B. hilaris in California [20]. In Mexico, two native species, Telenomus podisi Ashmead and Gryon myrmecophilum (Ashmead) (both Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), have been identified parasitizing B. hilaris eggs in the field [21]. In addition, Idris elba Talamas (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), a primary parasitoid of spider eggs, was detected parasitizing B. hilaris eggs in Mexico [22]. Besides these scelionids, an encyrtid species was recovered from surveys in California in 2018, and this parasitoid has recently been described as Ooencyrtus lucidus Triapitsyn & Ganjisaffar (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) [23]. Ooencyrtus lucidus is the first native parasitoid reported to attack B. hilaris eggs in the United States. It appears that O. lucidus switched from parasitizing eggs of its native hosts, such as the green stink bug, Chinavia hilaris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), to B. hilaris eggs upon its invasion [23]. Such host switch has been reported for several parasitoids species [22,24,25]. In this study, the life history traits of this new species on B. hilaris eggs were determined under laboratory conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Host, Bagrada hilaris

Bagrada hilaris colonies were established with adult insects collected in Riverside, California in 2010 and were periodically supplemented with field collected insects to maintain genetic diversity. The bugs were maintained in tent-style insect cages (BugDorm®-2120, MegaView Science Co., Taipei, Taiwan) on greenhouse-grown Brassicaceae seedlings, Lobularia maritima (L.) (sweet alyssum), Brassica oleracea L. variety Italica (broccoli), Brassica juncea (L.) (green mustard), and Brassica rapa variety Japonica (mizuna), in a greenhouse at 30 ± 5 °C with ambient humidity and light. To obtain eggs used in these studies, adult mating pairs were brought to an insectary room at the University of California, Riverside with 30 ± 1 °C, 40–50% humidity, and 14 L: 10 D photoperiod and placed in round plastic containers (15 cm diameter × 6 cm height) (Durphy® Packaging Co., Warminster, PA, USA) with two screen openings for ventilation. Paper towels were cut in circles and placed on the bottom of each container to provide an ovipositional substrate. Approximately 15 mating pairs were placed into each container (15–16 containers) and provided with organic broccoli florets as food every day. Adults were moved to new containers daily and the eggs laid within 24 h were used in the experiment or returned to the colony.

2.2. The Parasitoid, Ooencyrtus lucidus

The colony of O. lucidus was established from the wasps emerged from B. hilaris sentinel eggs parasitized in a squash field with mustard weeds in Riverside, California in 2018 [23]. This colony was maintained in an inverted plastic pantry container (11.4 cm diameter × 16.5 cm height) (Click Clack® Co., Levin, New Zealand) in an incubator at 26 ± 0.5 °C, 40 ± 10% humidity, and 14 L: 10 D photoperiod. The top was aerated by a 2.5-cm hole covered with a fine mesh. A 4-cm hole was made on the side of the container allowing access to the inside to provide the parasitoids with honey. This hole was plugged with a rubber stopper. Five to 6 lines of honey were streaked on a microscope slide which was placed inside the container and was replaced every 4–5 days. Thirty B. hilaris eggs (≤24 h old) were glued in 6 rows onto a 1.5 × 4 cm piece of card stock using the water-based Elmer’s® glue. Since O. lucidus had been recovered from glued eggs of B. hilaris in the field [23], we were confident that glue did not inhibit parasitism of this parasitoid. To reduce superparasitism (parasitizing a host egg more than once by a single parasitoid species), the card was placed into a 2.5 × 9.5 cm glass vial (Fisher Scientific, Inc., Portsmouth, NH, USA) containing three to four 3-day-old mated females of O. lucidus. This vial also was streaked with honey and plugged with cotton. The egg card was replaced daily, and the parasitized egg card was moved to a new vial and kept until all wasps emerged. The wasps that emerged from these vials were either used in experiments or returned to the rearing container.

2.3. Experimental Procedure

Approximately 50 mating pairs of the newly emerged wasps (≤24 h old) were transferred into two glass vials (25 pairs in each) streaked with honey and kept in the aforementioned incubator for 3 days. Bagrada hilaris eggs were glued using Elmer’s® glue on 10 cards (1.5 × 5 cm) made of a grid paper; each card had a 3 × 10 grid, containing 30 eggs. Each egg card was provided to three 3-day-old female wasps in a vial at a ratio of 1 wasp to 10 host eggs. After 24 h, the wasps were removed and eggs with one pedicel (non-superparasitized eggs) were cut out of the grid and placed in clear gel capsules size 00 (Capsuline®, Dania Beach, FL, USA). As is typical of many encyrtids and has been verified through host egg dissections in this study, each O. lucidus egg has a pedicel that protrudes from the host egg, serving as a respiratory tube for the developing larva [26]. The gel capsules were maintained in the same incubator at 26 °C and were checked daily until wasps emerged. The developmental time (egg to adult) and parasitism success (percentage of wasps emerged per parasitized eggs) were then recorded.
The emerged wasps (≤24 h old) then were used in the following treatments: (A) non-mated females and males were kept individually in separate vials and were provided only with honey, (B) a female and a male were kept together in the same vial and were provided only with honey, (C) a female and a male were kept together and were provided with both B. hilaris eggs and honey, (D) non-mated females were kept individually in vials and were provided with both B. hilaris eggs and honey, and (E) non-mated females and males were kept individually in vials with no eggs or honey. All wasps were held in 1.5 × 7.5 cm glass vials which were placed in separate trays for each treatment and they were held in the same incubator. The wasps were checked daily until they died. The initial number of replicates were 20 individuals for each sex in treatments A, B, D, and E, and 25 individuals of each sex in treatment C. Wasps that were stuck in honey were excluded from the analysis.
For treatments C and D, fourteen B. hilaris eggs (≤24 h old) were glued on 1 × 3.5 cm cards made of a 2 × 7 grid. The number of eggs provided was determined based on preliminary tests to be ad libitum. Every day, the wasps were provided with a new egg card, and the number of pedicels on each egg of the parasitoid-exposed egg card from the previous day was counted and the level of superparasitism also was determined. The egg card then was moved to a new vial and checked daily for wasp emergence for 30 days following oviposition. Bagrada hilaris nymphs that emerged from non-parasitized eggs were removed to prevent them from cannibalizing the remaining eggs. Although a low number of non-parasitized eggs died without hatching, we were not confident to associate that mortality with a factor induced by the wasps, such as host feeding, since the average mortality of B. hilaris eggs at 26 °C has been reported to be 11.7% [27]. Emerged wasps were sexed upon emergence and were transferred to the colony container. The parasitized eggs that did not hatch were dissected and the stage during which the mortality occurred was recorded. The adults that did not emerge were sexed and the numbers were included in the sex ratio calculation.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

For comparisons of developmental times and longevities between females and males, and pre-oviposition, oviposition, and post-oviposition periods between mated and non-mated females in treatments C and D, data first were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test (p < 0.05). Data then were analyzed using either a t-test or the nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test based on the distribution of the data. The fecundity data and parasitism success rates between mated and non-mated females were discrete data that were also analyzed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Longevity data for each sex were compared between all five treatments using one-way ANOVA followed by the nonparametric Dunn’s Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison. All data were analyzed in R [28] with the alpha ( α ) significance threshold set at 0.05. A life table for treatment C was constructed using the survival and reproduction data [29]. Then, the Jackknife procedure [30] was used to calculate the population growth parameters and their mean and standard errors [31]. Mortality percentages at each stage were compared between mated and non-mated females using Chi-squared test (p < 0.05).

3. Results

Of the initial 300 B. hilaris eggs provided to O. lucidus females, 273 eggs with one pedicel were collected from which 260 wasps developed successfully, yielding an emergence success of 95.2%. Ooencyrtus lucidus females and males completed their development at 26 °C in 14.27 ± 0.04 and 13.95 ± 0.05 days, respectively, which were significantly different (Z = 5.22, p < 0.001) (Figure 1a). The first day of emergence was 13 days after oviposition for both sexes. On day 13, 3.7% of females and 15.3% of males emerged. By the next day, 69.1% of all female progeny and 92.7% of all male progeny emerged. Combining both sexes, 80.0% of the eggs developed to the adult stage in 14 days (Figure 1b).
Access to honey and host eggs had a significant effect on the longevity of O. lucidus females (F 4 , 90 = 95.56, p < 0.001) (Figure 2). Mated and non-mated females fed with honey lived 70.8 ± 2.6 and 70.1 ± 2.8 days, respectively, and their longevity was not significantly different. Longevity of females that were provided with host eggs in addition to honey, and had reproductive activity significantly decreased by 24% (53.5 ± 3.3 days) in mated and by 28% (50.5 ± 3.4 days) in non-mated individuals. The effect of different treatments was also significant among males (F 3 , 62 = 169.7, p < 0.001). Non-mated males provided with honey had the longest longevity of 62.0 ± 2.8 days, which was not significantly different from the longevity of mated males provided with honey (52.4 ± 2.2 days) but was significantly longer than longevity of males paired with ovipositing females (43.6 ± 2.7 days). Non-mated females and males deprived of honey only lived for 3.5 ± 0.2 and 2.5 ± 0.1 days after emergence, respectively (Figure 2). Females lived significantly longer than males in all treatments (treatment A (non-mated + honey): Z = 2.43, P < 0.05; treatment B (mated + honey): t 28 = 5.35, p < 0.001; treatment C (mated + host eggs + honey): t 37 = 2.20, P < 0.05; treatment E (non-mated without honey): Z = 4.02, p < 0.001).
The pre-oviposition period of the mated females was on average 2.2 ± 0.2 days which was significantly longer than that of the non-mated females (1.5 ± 0.1 days) (Z = 2.75, p < 0.01) (Table 1). The first oviposition of mated females occurred on day 15 (2.7 eggs), and the daily fecundity increased to 3.9 eggs on day 20 and peaked on day 32 (4.1 eggs) (Figure 3). Mated females laid an average of 222.7 ± 12.6 eggs (ranged from 61 to 326) during their mean oviposition period of 37.3 ± 1.6 days, and the mean number of eggs laid daily by a female was 6.0 ± 0.3 eggs (Table 1). The mean fecundity of non-mated females was 217.9 ± 11.1 eggs (ranged from 107 to 290) during their mean oviposition period of 38.0 ± 1.8 days, and the mean number of eggs per female per day was 5.9 ± 0.4 eggs (Table 1). The number of eggs per day laid by a female ranged from 1 to 13 eggs (pedicels) for non-mated females and 1 to 15 eggs for mated females. When the number of pedicels exceeded the number of host eggs, superparasitism had occurred even though some of the eggs remained non-parasitized. The mean duration of the post-oviposition period was 13.9 ± 2.6 and 11.1 ± 2.4 days for mated and non-mated females, respectively. The average parasitism success rate which is the proportion of progeny emerged per eggs laid by a female per day was 0.77 ± 0.02 for the mated and 0.77 ± 0.03 for the non-mated females. The average sex ratio of progeny per mated female per day was 0.49 female progeny. Non-mated females produced only male progeny (Table 1). The average daily sex ratio of all 22 mated females (from emergence to death) for each 5-day interval is displayed in Figure 4. The average daily sex ratio was female biased from day 1 to 15 (ranging from 0.63 to 0.75), followed by a 1:1 ratio (0.50) from day 16 to 20. The average sex ratio then became male biased from day 21 to 40 (ranging from 0.35 to 0.07). In the last 10 days of their life (days 41-50), O. lucidus females produced only male progeny (Figure 4). The population growth parameters of mated O. lucidus were calculated as: net reproductive rate ( R 0 ) = 103.8 females/female/generation, intrinsic rate of increase ( r m ) = 0.171 female/female/day, the finite rate of increase ( λ ) = 1.187 population multiplication/day, the mean generation time (T) = 27.1 days, and the doubling time (DT) = 4.0 days (Table 2).
The average daily parasitism success rates indicate that more than 79% (ranging from 79.1% to 89.6%) of the parasitized eggs laid by mated females developed successfully when parasitism occurred in the first 20 days of females’ oviposition (Figure 5). From day 21 to 40, parasitism success rate ranged from 65.5% to 74.3%, and then declined to 60.6% from day 41 to 45, and 42.2% from day 46 to 50. For the non-mated females, parasitism success rate ranged from 79.4% to 89.6% from day 1 to 20 of the oviposition, and from 60.0% to 74.6% from day 21 to 50 of the oviposition. The high success rate from day 51 to 56 was due to the fact that only two females survived to these ages, and the emergence rate in eggs of those females was high (Figure 5).
Of 4899 eggs laid by all mated females in treatment C, 911 eggs (18.6%) either failed to develop (86.3%) or developed but could not emerge from the host eggs (13.7%). Non-mated females parasitized 4140 eggs out of which 869 eggs (21%) died. For these females, mortality was 88.6% for the immature stages and 11.4% for the adults (Table 3). The majority of immature mortality occurred during the parasitoid egg stage, followed by pupal, and larval mortalities (Table 3). For the mated females, the average daily egg mortality increased from 5.0% to 27.7% in the first 30 days of females’ oviposition. From day 31 to 40, egg mortality declined to 16.9%, and then increased again to 57.8% from day 41 to 50 (Figure 6). For the non-mated females, the average egg mortality increased from 3.4% to 37.7% in the first 40 days of females’ oviposition, and then declined until it reached 0% in the last five days of oviposition (Figure 6). The low egg mortality from day 46 to 56 was due to the low number of females that survived to these ages and the high emergence rate in eggs of those females (Figure 5). 5.7% (52 out of 911 eggs) and 3.6% (31 out 869 eggs) of the eggs were superparasitized by the mated and non-mated females, respectively. The superparasitized eggs of mated females always yielded one offspring. However, 19% (6 out of 31 cases) of the superparasitized eggs of non-mated females yielded two males from the same egg.

4. Discussion

Understanding the life history of natural enemies is a fundamental step toward determining their possible success as biological control agents. Parasitoids, especially egg parasitoids, are of great importance to biological control since they kill their hosts before any damage is done [32,33]. The genus Ooencyrtus Ashmead includes more than 300 known species [34], most of which are egg parasitoids of major agricultural or forest pests from Lepidoptera and Heteroptera orders [35]. Some examples include Ooencyrtus anasae (Ashmead) [36,37], Ooencyrtus fecundus Ferriere & Voegele [38,39], Ooencyrtus kuvanae Howard [40,41], Ooencyrtus nezarae Ishii [42,43], Ooencyrtus pistaciae Hayat & Mehrnejad [44,45], Ooencyrtus pityocampae Mercet [46,47,48], Ooencyrtus submetallicus Howard [37], and Ooencyrtus telenomicida Vassiliev [49,50,51]. In this study, we determined biological characteristics of O. lucidus, a species that was found parasitizing B. hilaris eggs in the field ten years after the introduction of B. hilaris in the United States.
Our results indicate that, 14 days after oviposition, 93% of O. lucidus male and 69% of female progeny emerged, and the mean developmental time of males (14 days) was shorter than females (14.3 days) at 26 °C. The shorter developmental time of males allows them to have more mating events with newly emerging females and greater fertilization opportunities in those females. We observed that newly eclosed males remained close to the eggs from which they emerged. A similar behavior has been described for Trichogramma species (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in which mating occurs at emergence sites [52,53]. Therefore, in the field, mating can occur on the host plant if early emerging males wait for females to emerge and mate with them. Moreover, as fecundity reaches a peak during the first week of emergence, it can be advantageous for males to be ready for mating during this period [54]. The developmental time of O. lucidus females on B. hilaris eggs is very close to that of Ooencyrtus mirus Triapitsyn & Power (14.5 days) on the same host at the same temperature [19]. Other species have shown longer developmental times on different hosts. For example, O. telenomicida females and males developed on Graphosoma lineatum L. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in 15.8 and 15.4 days, respectively, at 26 °C [51]. Ooencyrtus isabellae Guerrieri & Noyes adults completed their development on Zophiuma butawengi (Heller) (Hemiptera: Lophopidae) in 15.5 days in ambient temperatures (25–30 °C) [55].
Adult longevity of parasitoids is a major factor affecting the field efficacy of parasitoids in biological control programs. Parasitoid performance can be enhanced by increased longevity, which leads to increased searching time and fecundity [56,57]. Longevity is significantly enhanced by food availability for adults, therefore provision of food sources like floral nectar, aphid honeydew or pollen is necessary to increase the parasitoids’ efficiency [55,58]. We obtained consistent results with O. lucidus as adults could survive over two months when provided with honey, and the longevity decreased significantly in honey-deprived adults. Therefore, access to a food source is necessary for O. lucidus survivorship in the environment, particularly when host populations are low. A study by Reference [59] also showed that O. nezarae adults can only live for 2–3 days after emergence without honey, but they can survive 40-60 days when provided with honey. These authors also indicated that the shortage of non-host food sources can negatively affect host searching behavior and oviposition of O. nezarae. Another study on O. nezarae indicated that females can only live for 2.5–3 days without honey, but access to honey increases their longevity to 31 days in the presence of host eggs and 23 days in the absence of host eggs [60]. In addition, O. pityocampae adults that were exposed to honey lived 10.5 times longer than those that did not receive it [61]. Similar results have been reported for O. pityocampae [46] and O. isabellae [55]. Our study indicates that host egg availability and reproductive activity reduces the longevity of O. lucidus females, suggesting a trade-off exists between fecundity and longevity. However, this negative correlation may disappear in optimal conditions when parasitoids can obtain enough resources from the environment to compensate for the energy drain due to reproduction [62].
We expect that O. lucidus is a synovigenic parasitoid like other Ooencyrtus species in which females emerge with no or few mature eggs, and egg maturation in the ovaries continues after emergence. Based on our results, O. lucidus requires a pre-oviposition period of 2.1 (ranged from 1 to 5) days in mated and 1.5 (ranged from 1 to 2) days in non-mated females. The significantly longer pre-oviposition period of the mated females compared to non-mated females can be due to the presence of males in the experimental vials in the former treatment since males could interfere with female oviposition. In mated O. lucidus, the maximum oviposition occurred between 7 and 24 days after emergence. In O. kuvanae [63] and Ooencyrtus johnsoni (Howard) [64], the number of eggs peaked 9–11 days after emergence. Ooencyrtus lucidus showed a very high average fecundity of 223 eggs per female at 26 °C. The fecundity of this parasitoid was much higher than that observed in other species, such as O. pityocampae (122 eggs at 27 °C on Brachynema signatum Jakovlev (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)) [46], O. kuvanae (105 eggs on Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)) [65], and O. nezarae (75 eggs at 25 °C and 54 eggs at 27 °C on Riptortus clavatus (Thunberg) (Hemiptera: Alydidae)) [66]. The population growth parameters of O. lucidus also were superior to other species, such as O. telenomicida [51]. The net reproductive rate of O. lucidus (103.8 females/female/generation) on B. hilaris eggs was 2 times the potential of O. telenomicida on G. lineatum eggs (53.0 females/female/generation). This contributes to a higher intrinsic rate of increase (0.171 versus 0.154 female/female/day), and shorter doubling times (4.0 versus 4.5 days) for O. lucidus than O. telenomicida [51].
The sex ratio of O. lucidus progeny decreased with the age of the mother. Regulation of sex allocation with maternal age has been reported for other parasitoids [67,68,69]. Several physiological factors can result in the sex change and increase of male production by aged females, such as sperm depletion or senescence, reduced sperm viability, or weakened control of sperm release from spermatheca [70,71,72,73]. Sex ratio can also be affected by developmental mortality [74,75], superparasitism [76,77], or Wolbachia infection [78]. Since the daily sex ratio is the number of females produced each day as a proportion of the daily fecundity, a decrease in the number of female progeny or a decrease in fecundity can decrease the progeny sex ratio. Fecundity of mated O. lucidus females that were over 40 days old declined, and only male progeny were produced. Therefore, both decreased fecundity and sperm depletion could contribute to the sex ratio change of progeny as maternal age increased. Furthermore, the males in the present study were not replaced during the experiment, therefore, a high frequency of mating with one male could lead to a decrease in sperm numbers or sperm depletion [79].
The emergence rate of 95.2% was obtained from eggs with one pedicel (non-superparasitized eggs) laid by 3-day-old parent wasps. The average parasitism success rate in the F 2 generation in the first five days of oviposition was 89.6% (ranging from 84.2% to 92.9%). The lower success rate in the F 2 generation is due to the fact that we utilized all eggs, including the superparasitized ones, even though there were less than 6%. This low superparasitism rate may be caused by an ability to discriminate between parasitized and non-parasitized eggs. Studies have confirmed that the parasitoid’s egg pedicel serves as an external marker and is responsible for host discrimination after parasitism in several Ooencyrtus species, including O. nezarae [80] and O. pityocampae [81]. Whether this exists for O. lucidus needs to be tested through behavioral observations. Another factor that is known to contribute to immature mortality is reduced viability of females’ eggs over time [82,83], which we documented in the F 2 generation.
Interestingly, we observed more progeny survival in the superparasitized eggs laid by non-mated females compared to mated females. Since the progeny of non-mated females were all males which have smaller body sizes, it suggests that the nutritional resources of a B. hilaris egg are sufficient enough only for the survival of two males, and not for two females or one female and one male.
The results obtained in this study suggest that O. lucidus has the basic biological parameters that are desired for B. hilaris management. However, a parasitoid’s reproductive capacity in the field can be restricted by the host’s density and its accessibility [84]. Bagrada hilaris eggs are laid individually or in very small clusters of 2 to 3 eggs on plants or in the soil [3,85]. Therefore, there might be a trade-off between the energy required to locate and parasitize these individual hidden eggs and fecundity [86]. Further field studies are needed to better understand how effective this parasitoid species would be for the biological control of B. hilaris.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.G. and T.M.P.; Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, and Resources, T.M.P.; Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, and Writing—original draft, F.G.; Writing—review & editing, F.G. and T.M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported, in part, by California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Specialty Crops Block Grant SBC16053.

Acknowledgments

We thank Danielle Ruais, Shayla Hampel, Colt Bellman, and Henderson Hsu for their assistance in maintaining Bagrada hilaris colonies and preparing B. hilaris egg cards for this study, and Charles Pickett (CDFA, Sacramento) for his collaboration on the grant. We also thank the reviewers for their valuable comments which helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Howard, C.W. The Entomological section: The bagrada bug (Bagrada hilaris). Transvaal Agric. J. 1906, 5, 168–176. [Google Scholar]
  2. Husain, M.A. Annual report of the entomologist to government, Punjab, Lyallpur, for the year ending 30th June 1924. Rept. Dept. Agric. Punjab 1923–24. 1925, 1, 55–90. [Google Scholar]
  3. Reed, D.A.; Palumbo, J.C.; Perring, T.M.; May, C. Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), an invasive stink bug attacking cole crops in the southwestern United States. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2013, 4, C1–C7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Palumbo, J.C.; Perring, T.M.; Millar, J.G.; Reed, D.A. Biology, ecology, and management of an invasive stink bug, Bagrada hilaris, in North America. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2016, 61, 453–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Palumbo, J.C.; Natwick, E.T. The bagrada bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae): A new invasive pest of cole crops in Arizona and California. Plant Health Prog. 2010, 11, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Huang, T.I.; Reed, D.A.; Perring, T.M.; Palumbo, J.C. Feeding damage by Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and impact on growth and chlorophyll content of Brassicaceous plant species. Arthropod-Plant Inte. 2014, 8, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Arakelian, G. Bagrada Bug (Bagrada hilaris); Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner/Weights and Measures Department: Arcadia, CA, USA, 2008.
  8. Bundy, C.S.; Grasswitz, T.R.; Sutherland, C. First report of the invasive stink bug Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) from New Mexico, with notes on its biology. Southwest Entomol. 2012, 37, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vitanza, S. Issues in agriculture. Texas A&M AgriLife Ext. Newsl. 2012, 38, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Perring, T.M.; Reed, D.A.; Palumbo, J.C.; Grasswitz, T.; Bundy, C.S.; Jones, W.; Royer, T. National Pest Alert: Bagrada Bug Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) Family Pentatomidae; USDA-NIFA Regional IPM Centers: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2013.
  11. Joseph, S.V.; Grettenberger, I.; Godfrey, L. Insecticides applied to soil of transplant plugs for Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) management in broccoli. Crop Protect. 2016, 87, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sánchez-Peña, S.R. First record in Mexico of the invasive stink bug Bagrada hilaris, on cultivated crucifers in Saltillo. Southwest Entomol. 2014, 39, 375–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hernández-Chávez, L.; Salas-Araiza, M.D.; Martínez-Jaime, O.A.; Flores-Mejía, S. First report of Bagrada hilaris Burmeister, 1835 (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in the state of Guanajuato, Mexico. Entomol. News 2018, 128, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Faúndez, E.I.; Lüer, A.; Cuevas, Á.G.; Rider, D.A.; Valdebenito, P. First record of the painted bug Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister, 1835) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in South America. Arquivos Entomol. 2016, 16, 175–179. [Google Scholar]
  15. Faúndez, E.I.; Lüer, A.; Cuevas, Á.G. The establishment of Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister, 1835) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in Chile, an avoidable situation? Arquivos Entomol. 2017, 17, 239–241. [Google Scholar]
  16. Carvajal, M.A.; Alaniz, A.J.; Núñez-Hidalgo, I.; González-Césped, C. Spatial global assessment of the pest Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): Current and future scenarios. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bundy, C.S.; Perring, T.M.; Reed, D.A.; Palumbo, J.C.; Grasswitz, T.R.; Jones, W.A. Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister). In Invasive Stink Bugs and Related Species (Pentatomoidea): Biology, Higher Systematics, Semiochemistry, and Management; McPherson, J.E., Ed.; CRC Press: Cleveland, OH, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. Martel, G.; Auge, M.; Talamas, E.; Roche, M.; Smith, L.; Sforza, R.F.H. First laboratory evaluation of Gryon gonikopalense (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), as potential biological control agent of Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Biol. Control 2019, 135, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Power, N.; Ganjisaffar, F.; Perring, T.M. Effect of temperature on the survival and developmental rate of immature Ooencyrtus mirus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ganjisaffar, F.; Talamas, E.J.; Bon, M.C.; Gonzalez, L.; Brown, B.V.; Perring, T.M. Trissolcus hyalinipennis Rajmohana & Narendran (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae), a parasitoid of Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister) (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae), emerges in North America. J. Hymenopt. Res. 2018, 65, 111–130. [Google Scholar]
  21. Felipe-Victoriano, M.; Talamas, E.; Sánchez-Peña, S. Scelionidae (Hymenoptera) parasitizing eggs of Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) in Mexico. J. Hymenopt. Res. 2019, 73, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lomeli-Flores, J.R.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, S.E.; Rodríguez-Levya, E.; González-Hernández, H.; Gariepy, T.D.; Talamas, E.J. Field studies and molecular forensics identify a new association: Idris elba Talamas, sp. nov. parasitizes the eggs of Bagrada hilaris (Burmeister). J. Hymenopt. Res. 2019, 73, 125–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Triapitsyn, S.; Andreason, S.; Power, N.; Ganjisaffar, F.; Fusu, L.; Dominguez, C.; Perring, T.M. Two new species of Ooencyrtus (Hymenoptera, Encyrtidae), egg parasitoids of the bagrada bug Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae), with taxonomic notes on Ooencyrtus telenomicida. J. Hymenopt. Res. 2020, 76, 57–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jones, T.S.; Bilton, A.R.; Mak, L.; Sait, S.M. Host switching in a generalist parasitoid: Contrasting transient and transgenerational costs associated with novel and original host species. Ecol. Evol. 2015, 5, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Matošević, D.; Melika, G. Recruitment of native parasitoids to a new invasive host: First results of Dryocosmus kuriphilus parasitoid assemblage in Croatia. Bull. Insectol. 2013, 66, 231–238. [Google Scholar]
  26. Maple, J.D. The Eggs and First Instar Larvae of Encyrtidae and Their Morphological Adaptations for Respiration; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1947. [Google Scholar]
  27. Reed, D.A.; Ganjisaffar, F.; Palumbo, J.C.; Perring, T.M. Effects of temperatures on immature development and survival of the invasive stink bug Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 2497–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Carey, J.R. Applied Demography for Biologists: With Special Emphasis on Insects; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  30. Meyer, J.S.; Ingersoll, C.G.; McDonald, L.L.; Boyce, M.S. Estimating uncertainty in population growth rates: Jackknife vs. bootstrap techniques. Ecology 1986, 67, 1156–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. SAS Institute. SAS 9.4 SQL Procedure User’s Guide; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bin, F. Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids other than Trichogramma. In Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids; Wajnberg, E., Hassan, S.A., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  33. Conti, E.; Colazza, S. Chemical ecology of egg parasitoids associated with true bugs. Psyche 2012, 2012, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Noyes, J.S. Universal Chalcidoidea database world wide web electronic publication. 2012. Acesso em 2015, 1. Available online: https://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/data/chalcidoids/ (accessed on 2 May 2020).
  35. Huang, D.W.; Noyes, J.S. A revision of the Indo-Pacific species of Ooencyrtus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), parasitoids of the immature stages of economically important insect species (mainly Hemiptera and Lepidoptera). Bull. Br Mus (Nat Hist) Entomol. Ser. 1994, 63, 1–136. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cornelius, M.L.; Vinyard, B.T.; Gates, M.W. Use of flowering plants to enhance parasitism and predation rates on two squash bug species Anasa tristis and Anasa armigera (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Insects 2019, 10, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Sousa, K.K.A.; Silva, N.N.P.; Querino, R.B.; Silva, P.H.S.; Grazia, J. Diversity, seasonality, and egg parasitism of Hemipteran (Coreidae and Pentatomidae) from a cowpea crop in northeastern Brazil. Fla Entomol. 2019, 102, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  38. Parker, B.L.; Amir-Maafi, M.; Skinner, M.; Kim, J.S.; El Bouhssini, M. Distribution of sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae), in overwintering sites. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2011, 14, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahmadpour, S.; Iranipour, S.; Asgari, S. Effects of superparasitism on reproductive fitness of Ooencyrtus fecundus Ferriere & Foegele (Hym. Encyrtidae), egg parasitoid of sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hem. Scutelleridae). Biol. Control Pests Plant Dis. 2014, 2, 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  40. Brown, M.W. Literature review of Ooencyrtus kuvanae [Hym.: Encyrtidae], an egg parasite of Lymantria dispar [Lep: Lymantriidae]. Entomophaga 1984, 29, 249–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, H.; Mottern, J. An old remedy for a new problem? identification of Ooencyrtus kuvanae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), an egg parasitoid of Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) in North America. J. Insect Sci. 2017, 17, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Takasu, K.; Hirose, Y. Host acceptance behavior by the host-feeding egg parasitoid, Ooencyrtus nezarae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae): Host age effects. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1993, 86, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ademokoya, B.; Balusu, R.; Ray, C.; Mottern, J.; Fadamiro, H. The first record of Ooencyrtus nezarae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on kudzu bug (Hemiptera: Plataspidae) in North America. J. Insect Sci. 2018, 18, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hayat, M.; Mehrnejad, M. Ooencyrtus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), egg parasitoids of the pistachio green stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Iran. Zootaxa 2016, 4117, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Samra, S.; Cascone, P.; Noyes, J.; Ghanim, M.; Protasov, A.; Guerrieri, E.; Mendel, Z. Diversity of Ooencyrtus spp. (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) parasitizing the eggs of Stenozygum coloratum (Klug) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) with description of two new species. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mohammadpour, M.; Jalali, M.A.; Ziaaddini, M.; Hashemirad, H. Some biological characteristics of Ooencyrtus pityocampae Mercet parasitoid of Brachynema signatum Jakovlev under laboratory conditions. J. Pistachio Health 2018, 1, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tabone, E.; Tunca, H.; Colombel, E.A.; Venard, M.; Defferier, T.; Martin, J.C. Performance of egg parasitoid Ooencyrtus pityocampae (Mercet) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) on three substitute hosts in laboratory. In Proceedings of the II International Symposium on Innovative Plant Protection in Horticulture, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–16 August 2018; pp. 135–140. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tunca, H.; Venard, M.; Colombel, E.A.; Capelli, M.; Tabone, E. Life history traits of Ooencyrtus pityocampae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) reared on Halyomorpha halys eggs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Entomol. Gen. 2019, 39, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Foti, M.C.; Peri, E.; Wajnberg, E.; Colazza, S.; Rostás, M. Contrasting olfactory responses of two egg parasitoids to buckwheat floral scent are reflected in field parasitism rates. J. Pest Sci. 2019, 92, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rondoni, G.; Bertoldi, V.; Malek, R.; Foti, M.C.; Peri, E.; Maistrello, L.; Haye, T.; Conti, E. Native egg parasitoids recorded from the invasive Halyomorpha halys successfully exploit volatiles emitted by the plant—Herbivore complex. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Roversi, P.F.; Maltese, M.; Simoni, S.; Cascone, P.; Binazzi, F.; Strangi, A.; Sabbatini Peverieri, G.; Guerrieri, E. Graphosoma lineatum (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae): A suitable host for mass rearing Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Int. J. Pest Manag. 2018, 64, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Doyon, J.; Boivin, G. The effect of development time on the fitness of female Trichogramma evanescens. J. Insect Sci. 2005, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pompanon, F.; Fouillet, P.; Bouletréau, M. Emergence rhythms and protandry in relation to daily patterns of locomotor activity in Trichogramma species. Evol. Ecol. 1995, 9, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Morbey, Y.E.; Ydenberg, R.C. Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: A review. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guerrieri, E.; Gitau, C.W.; Fletcher, M.J.; Noyes, J.S.; Dewhurst, C.F.; Gurr, G.M. Description and biological parameters of Ooencyrtus isabellae Guerrieri and Noyes sp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Encyrtidae), a potential biocontrol agent of Zophiuma butawengi (Heller) (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Lophopidae) in Papua New Guinea. J. Nat. Hist. 2011, 45, 2747–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Heimpel, G.E.; Jervis, M.A. Does floral nectar improve biological control by parasitoids? In Plant-Provided Food for Carnivorous Insects: A Protective Mutualism and Its Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005; pp. 267–304. [Google Scholar]
  57. Aung, K.S.D.; Takasu, K.; Ueno, T.; Takagi, M. Effect of temperature on egg maturation and longevity of the egg parasitoids Ooencyrtus nezarae (Ishii) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu U. 2010, 55, 87–89. [Google Scholar]
  58. Baggen, L.R.; Gurr, G.M.; Meats, A. Flowers in tri-trophic systems: Mechanisms allowing selective exploitation by insect natural enemies for conservation biological control. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1999; pp. 155–161. [Google Scholar]
  59. Takasu, K.; Hirose, Y. Host searching behavior in the parasitoid Ooencyrtus nezarae Ishii (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) as influenced by non-host food deprivation. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1991, 26, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Teraoka, T.; Numata, H. Effects of feeding on reproduction and overwintering in female adults of Ooencyrtus nezarae Ishii (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2000, 35, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Tunca, H.; Colombel, E.A.; Ben Soussan, T.; Buradino, M.; Galio, F.; Tabone, E. Optimal biological parameters for rearing Ooencyrtus pityocampae on the new laboratory host Philosamia ricini. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 140, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ball, G. The cost of reproduction. Oxf. Surv. Evolut. Biol. 1986, 3, 83–131. [Google Scholar]
  63. Weseloh, R.M. Host and microhabitat preferences of forest parasitic Hymenoptera: Inferences from captures on colored sticky panels. Environ. Entomol. 1986, 15, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Maple, J.D. The biology of Ooencyrtus johnsoni (Howard), and the role of the egg shell in the respiration of certain encyrtid larvae (Hymenoptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1937, 30, 123–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Crossman, S.S. Two imported egg parasites of the gipsy moth, Anastatus bifasciatus Fonsc and Schedius kuvanae Howard. J. Agric. Res. 1925, 30, 643–675. [Google Scholar]
  66. Aung, K.S.D.; Takagi, M.; Myint, Y.Y.; Yun, K.M.; Ueno, T. Effect of host density on the progeny production of the egg parasitoids Ooencyrtus nezarae (Ishii) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu U 2011, 56, 71–74. [Google Scholar]
  67. Uçkan, F.; Gülel, A. Age-related fecundity and sex ratio variation in Apanteles galleriae (Hym., Braconidae) and host effect on fecundity and sex ratio of its hyperparasitoid Dibrachys boarmiae (Hym., Pteromalidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 2002, 126, 534–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gündüz, E.A.; Gülel, A. Investigation of fecundity and sex ratio in the parasitoid Bracon hebetor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in relation to parasitoid age. Turkish J. Zool. 2005, 29, 291–294. [Google Scholar]
  69. Liu, P.C.; Wei, H.X.; Cao, D.D.; Wei, J.R. Relationships amongst sex ratio of progeny in Anastatus disparis (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae), sperm depletion and decreased fecundity. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2020, 55, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. King, B.H. Offspring sex ratios in parasitoid wasps. Q. Rev. Biol. 1987, 62, 367–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ueno, T. Age-dependent constraints of sex allocation in a parasitoid wasp. Psyche 2014, 2014, 363174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Pandey, A.K.; Tripathi, S.; Tripathi, C. Effects of parental age at mating on the fecundity and progeny sex ratio of Campoletis chlorideae, an endolarval parasitoid of the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. BioControl 2009, 54, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Santolamazza-Carbone, S.; Nieto, M.P.; Rivera, A.C. Maternal size and age affect offspring sex ratio in the solitary egg parasitoid Anaphes nitens. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2007, 125, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hardy, I.C.; Dijkstra, L.J.; Gillis, J.E.; Luft, P.A. Patterns of sex ratio, virginity and developmental mortality in gregarious parasitoids. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1998, 64, 239–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kapranas, A.; Wajnberg, E.; Luck, R.F. Sequences of sex allocation and mortality in clutches of Metaphycus parasitoids of soft scale insects and the prevalence of all-female broods. Ecol. Entomol. 2009, 34, 652–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Santolamazza-Carbone, S.; Rivera, A.C. Superparasitism and sex ratio adjustment in a wasp parasitoid: Results at variance with local mate competition? Oecologia 2003, 136, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Van Alphen, J.J.; Visser, M.E. Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1990, 35, 59–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Stouthamer, R.; Hurst, G.; Breeuwer, J. Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  79. Lewis, S.M. Multiple mating and repeated copulations: Effects on male reproductive success in red flour beetles. Anim. Behav. 2004, 67, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Takasu, K.; Hirose, Y. Host discrimination in the parasitoid Ooencyrtus nezarae: The role of the egg stalk as an external marker. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1988, 47, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mohammadpour, M.; Jalali, M.A.; Michaud, J.P.; Ziaaddini, M.; Hashemirad, H. Multiparasitism of stink bug eggs: Competitive interactions between Ooencyrtus pityocampae and Trissolcus agriope. BioControl 2014, 59, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Mackauer, M. Host discrimination and larval competition in solitary endoparasitoids. In Critical Issues in Biological Control; Mackauer, M., Ehler, L., Roland, J., Eds.; Intercept Limited: Andover, UK, 1990; pp. 41–62. [Google Scholar]
  83. Boivin, G. Phenotypic plasticity and fitness in egg parasitoids. Neotrop. Entomol. 2010, 39, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Price, P.W. Reproductive strategies of parasitoids. In Evolutionary Strategies of Parasitic Insects and Mites; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1975; pp. 87–111. [Google Scholar]
  85. Taylor, M.E.; Bundy, C.S.; McPherson, J.E. Unusual ovipositional behavior of the stink bug Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2014, 107, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Jervis, M.A.; Ellers, J.; Harvey, J.A. Resource acquisition, allocation, and utilization in parasitoid reproductive strategies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008, 53, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) The mean (±SE) developmental times of the two sexes. Bars accompanied by different letters are significantly different (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.0001). (b) Distribution of developmental times in Ooencyrtus lucidus females (n = 136), males (n = 124), and combined sexes (n = 260).
Figure 1. (a) The mean (±SE) developmental times of the two sexes. Bars accompanied by different letters are significantly different (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.0001). (b) Distribution of developmental times in Ooencyrtus lucidus females (n = 136), males (n = 124), and combined sexes (n = 260).
Insects 11 00292 g001
Figure 2. Mean (±SE) longevity of Ooencyrtus lucidus females and males in different treatments. n is the number of wasps that died naturally in each treatment excluding the ones that were stuck in honey. In the last treatment, non-mated without honey, all the initial number of wasps (n = 20) were used in the analyses. Significant differences are represented by capital letters for females and lower-case letters for males (Dunn’s Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison, p < 0.05). The asterisks (*) represent significant differences between females and males within each treatment (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test or t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Mean (±SE) longevity of Ooencyrtus lucidus females and males in different treatments. n is the number of wasps that died naturally in each treatment excluding the ones that were stuck in honey. In the last treatment, non-mated without honey, all the initial number of wasps (n = 20) were used in the analyses. Significant differences are represented by capital letters for females and lower-case letters for males (Dunn’s Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison, p < 0.05). The asterisks (*) represent significant differences between females and males within each treatment (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test or t-test, p < 0.05).
Insects 11 00292 g002
Figure 3. Age specific survival rate (dashed line) and fecundity (solid line) of mated Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs.
Figure 3. Age specific survival rate (dashed line) and fecundity (solid line) of mated Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs.
Insects 11 00292 g003
Figure 4. Mean (±SE) sex ratio (females/progeny/day) of mated females (n = 22) of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs at five-day intervals from oviposition to death.
Figure 4. Mean (±SE) sex ratio (females/progeny/day) of mated females (n = 22) of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs at five-day intervals from oviposition to death.
Insects 11 00292 g004
Figure 5. Parasitism success: mean (±SE) percentage of progeny emerged per eggs laid by all mated (n = 22) and non-mated (n = 19) females of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs at five-day intervals from oviposition to death.
Figure 5. Parasitism success: mean (±SE) percentage of progeny emerged per eggs laid by all mated (n = 22) and non-mated (n = 19) females of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs at five-day intervals from oviposition to death.
Insects 11 00292 g005
Figure 6. Mean (±SE) percentage of egg mortality in the progeny of all mated (n = 22) and non-mated (n = 19) females of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs at five-day intervals from oviposition to death.
Figure 6. Mean (±SE) percentage of egg mortality in the progeny of all mated (n = 22) and non-mated (n = 19) females of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs at five-day intervals from oviposition to death.
Insects 11 00292 g006
Table 1. Reproduction parameters (mean ± SE) of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris.
Table 1. Reproduction parameters (mean ± SE) of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris.
ParametersMated FemalesNon-Mated Femalesp
Pre-oviposition period (days) 2.2 ± 0.2 a 1.5 ± 0.1 b 0.0066
Oviposition period (days) 37.3 ± 1.6 a 38.0 ± 1.8 a 0.7819 *
Post-oviposition period (days) 13.9 ± 2.6 a 11.1 ± 2.4 a 0.5037
Total fecundity (eggs/female) 222.7 ± 12.6 a 217.9 ± 11.1 a 0.7807
Fecundity rate (eggs/female/day) 6.0 ± 0.3 a 5.9 ± 0.4 a 0.8614 *
Parasitism success rate (progeny/eggs laid by a female/day) 0.77 ± 0.02 a 0.77 ± 0.03 a 0.7120
Sex ratio ([females/progeny]/female/day) 0.49 ± 0.04 0.00 (all male)
Values within the same row followed by the same letter are not significantly different, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test or * t-test (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Population growth parameters (mean ± SE) of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs.
Table 2. Population growth parameters (mean ± SE) of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs.
ParametersEquationsMated Females
Net reproductive rate ( R 0 ) l x m x 103.8 ± 12.0
Intrinsic rate of increase ( r m ) x = 0 n e r x l x m x = 1 0.171 ± 0.005
Finite rate of increase ( λ ) e r m 1.187 ± 0.005
Mean generation time (T) ln R 0 r m 27.1 ± 1.1
Doubling time (DT) ln 2 r m 4.0 ± 0.1
Table 3. Parasitism failure: percentage of mortality during development of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs.
Table 3. Parasitism failure: percentage of mortality during development of Ooencyrtus lucidus on Bagrada hilaris eggs.
Life StagesMated FemalesNon-Mated FemalesX 2 p
Number of DeadNumber of Dead
at each Stage
Mortality
(%)
Number of DeadNumber of Dead
at each Stage
Mortality
(%)
Eggs91171678.686967978.10.060.7980
Larvae202.2384.46.790.0091 *
Pupae505.5536.10.290.5882
Adults12513.79911.42.140.1436
The asterisks (*) represent significant differences in mortality percentages between mated and non-mated females (Chi-squared test, p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ganjisaffar, F.; Perring, T.M. Life History Evaluation of Ooencyrtus lucidus, a Newly Described Egg Parasitoid of Bagrada hilaris. Insects 2020, 11, 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050292

AMA Style

Ganjisaffar F, Perring TM. Life History Evaluation of Ooencyrtus lucidus, a Newly Described Egg Parasitoid of Bagrada hilaris. Insects. 2020; 11(5):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ganjisaffar, Fatemeh, and Thomas M. Perring. 2020. "Life History Evaluation of Ooencyrtus lucidus, a Newly Described Egg Parasitoid of Bagrada hilaris" Insects 11, no. 5: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop