# “All that Matter … in One Big Bang …”, &Other Cosmological Singularities

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. The Very Origins: Leavitt, Slipher, Hubble, Lemaître, Einstein, …

#### 2.1. Old Models of the Universe

#### 2.2. Henrietta Leavitt

#### 2.3. Vesto Slipher

#### 2.4. A Great Debate

#### 2.5. An Island Universe

“FINDS SPIRAL NEBULAE ARE STELLAR SYSTEMS; Dr. Hubbell Confirms View That They are ‘Island Universes’ Similar To Our Own.WASHINGTON, Nov. 22. Confirmation of the view that the spiral nebulae, which appear in the heavens as whirling clouds, are in reality distant stellar systems, or “island universes”, has been obtained by Dr. Edwin Hubbell of the Carnegie Institution’s Mount Wilson observatory, through investigations carried out with the observatory’s powerful telescopes.”

#### 2.6. Hubble’s Law

“… your velocities and my distances…”

“… the first steps in a new field are the most difficult and the most significant. Once the barrier is forced further development is relatively simple.”

#### 2.7. The Interpretation of Hubble’s Law

“ … we use the term ‘apparent velocities’ in order to emphasize the empirical feature of the correlation. The interpretation, we feel, should be left to you and the very few others who are competent to discuss the matter with authority.”

#### 2.8. George Lemaître and the Expanding Universe: A Perfect Example of Stigler’s Law of Eponymy

“No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer”.

## 3. “All Matter … in One Big Bang …”

#### 3.1. Some Common Popular Sources on the Big Bang

#### 3.2. Fred Hoyle

“The concept of nucleosynthesis in stars was first established by Hoyle in 1946”.

“… for it’s an irrational process, and can’t be described in scientific terms”; “… belief in the first page of Genesis”.

#### 3.3. The ‘Free Lunch’ Concept

“… a closed universe can equal zero energy. All mass/energy is positive and all gravitational energy is negative, and they may cancel each other out, leading to a universe of zero energy”.

#### 3.4. A Big Bang!

“[Lemaître’s model implies that] … all matter in the universe was created in one Big Bang at a particular time …”.

“Everybody knows that the rival Big Bang theory won the battle of the cosmologies, but few (not even astronomers) appreciate that the mathematical formalism of the now-favored version of Big Bang, called inflation, is identical to Hoyle’s version of the Steady State model”.

## 4. The Many Different Faucets of the Concept of Big Bang

#### 4.1. The Big Bang Singularity

#### 4.1.1. The Belinsky–Khalatnikov–Lifshitz and the Misner Singularities

#### 4.1.2. The Classical Singularity Theorems

**Theorem 1**(Big Bang)

**.**

**Theorem 2**(Black Holes)

**.**

#### 4.1.3. On the Borde–Guth–Vilenkin Theorem

#### 4.2. A Quick Sketch of the Possible Origin of the Universe

- In fundamental classical physics, the ultimate theory is GR, and there, the vacuum solution is the de Sitter solution (the zero-energy one) of Einstein’s field equations.
- In quantum physics, on the other hand, ‘nothing’ means the vacuum state of the quantum system at hand, e.g., in our case, the one at the very beginning of all, as far as we can go into the past.
- It needs little explanation that we are missing here the actual theory that we would need in order to answer the question with more property, namely the theory of quantum gravity (QG).
- However, it is not clear at all that, even in possession of QG, we would be allowed to penetrate the Planck domain, which establishes a limit to all known theories of physics (quite probably also to this unknown QG).

- Just quantum spacetime, and nothing else! In spite of some attempts to do that (as most recently by Lawrence Krauss and Frank Wilczek), nobody has convincingly succeeded yet.
- In addition, a scalar field Hamiltonian (or two), namely the Higgs, an inflaton, … This seems of course a more feasible possibility, at the expense of having to explain from where do these additional necessary fields come.

#### 4.3. Big Bang Cosmological Models

#### 4.3.1. The Hot Big Bang Model

“The evolution of the world can be compared to a display of fireworks that has just ended; some few red wisps, ashes and smoke. Standing on a cooled cinder, we see the slow fading of the suns, and we try to recall the vanishing brilliance of the origin of the worlds.”

- The Universe’s expansion.
- The origin of the CMB.
- The primordial nucleosynthesis of the light elements.
- The formation of the galaxies and of large-scale structures.

#### 4.3.2. The Cold Big Bang and Other Models

“If matter existed as a single atomic nucleus, it makes no sense to speak of space and time in connection with this atom. Space and time are statistical notions that apply to an assembly of a great number of individual elements; they were meaningless notions, therefore, at the instant of first disintegration of the primeval atom.”

## 5. Acceleration: New Singularities

- $w=-1$, the cosmological constant case. It is the simplest and most natural in general relativity, but difficult to explain, and it seems to need a symmetry no one has been able to find yet, in a convincing way, in order to solve the associated cosmological constant problem.
- $w>-1$, the so-called quintessence case. This is the most ordinary case and usually involves an evolving scalar field.
- $w<-1$, the phantom case. This involves a so-called phantom field (of negative kinetic energy) and leads to a number of future singularities at finite (or infinite) time.

- The Big Rip or Type I singularity (occurring in a phantom-dominated universe) [135]. In the limit $t={t}_{s}$ (a finite value of time in the future), all quantities, namely the scale factor, effective energy density and pressure of the universe, diverge.
- Type III or Big Freeze future singularity. In this case, only the scale factor remains finite, while both the effective energy density and pressure of the universe diverge at $t={t}_{s}$. These can be either weak or strong singularities, which are geodesically-complete solutions.
- Type IV or Generalized Sudden singularity. In the limit $t={t}_{s}$, none of these, the scale factor, effective energy density or pressure, diverge. However, higher derivatives of the Hubble rate H become divergent (not H itself and its first derivative), as discovered in [140], where a full classification was given. In this case, a weak singularity appears, and geodesics are complete.

- There is still the case of the so-called Little Rip universes, where the future singularities occur asymptotically, at infinite time only. Typically, this happens when the scale factor increases rapidly, as $a\left(t\right)=exp[exp(t\left)\right]$ or higher exponentials [142,143]. However, different combinations are also possible, such as an oscillating universe (bounce). Furthermore, the very important point must be remarked that quantum gravity effects may affect this future evolution, preventing a Big Rip from occurring due to such quantum effects [144,145] or by a similar Casimir-type effect or other (see, e.g., [145,146,147,148]).

- The Q-singularity, which appears in models where there is an interaction between dark matter and dark energy. On top of the above future singularities, a divergence of the time derivative of w may give rise to a singular interaction. In fact, perturbations may be sensitive to it, since the adiabatic sound speed in a barotropic fluid depends on w’ [151].

## 6. Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Einstein, A. Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1913; pp. 844–847. [Google Scholar]
- Rovelli, C. The First Scientist, Anaximander and his Legacy; Westholme Publishing: Yardley, PA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Luchte, J. Early Greek Thought: Before the Dawn; Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Anaximander der erste Kosmologe. Available online: http://www.spektrum.de/magazin/anaximander-der-erste-kosmologe/1219657 (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Van Helden, A. Measuring the Universe; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, E.R. Darkness at Night: A Riddle of the Universe; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Gamow, G. Conversation of Gamow with Einstein in the 1940s. In My World Line: An Informal Autobiography; Viking Press: New York, NY, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Leavitt, H.S.; Pickering, E.C. Periods of 25 Variable Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Harv. Coll. Obs. Circ.
**1912**, 173, 1–3. [Google Scholar] - Leavitt, H.S. 1777 Variables in the Magellanic Clouds. Ann. Harv. Coll. Obs. LX (IV)
**1908**, 60, 87–110. [Google Scholar] - 1912: Henrietta Leavitt Discovers the Distance Key. Available online: http://cosmology.carnegiescience.edu/timeline/1912 (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Stellar Variability. Available online: http://www.kcvs.ca/martin/astro/course/lectures/winter/var.htm (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Byers, N.; Williams, G. (Eds.) Out of the Shadows: Contributions of Twentieth-Century Women to Physics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- George, J. Miss Leavitt’s Stars: The Untold Story of the Woman Who Discovered How to Measure the Universe, 1st ed.; Norton: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Lamb, G.M. Before computers, there were these humans. The Christian Science Monitor, 5 July 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Kidwell, P.A.; Leavitt, H.S. American National Biography Online; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Rowan-Robinson, M. The Cosmological Distance Ladder: Distance and Time in the Universe, 1st ed.; W.H. Freeman & Co.: Gordonsville, VA, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Type Ia Supernovae as Standardized Candles. Available online: https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March03/Perlmutter/Perl2_2.html (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Slipher, V. The radial velocity of the Andromeda Nebula. Lowell Obs. Bull.
**1912**, 2, 56–57. [Google Scholar] - Slipher, V. Spectrographic Observations of Nebulae. Pop. Astron.
**1915**, 23, 21–24. [Google Scholar] - Thompson, L.A. Vesto Slipher and the First Galaxy Redshifts. arXiv, 2011; arXiv:1108.4864. [Google Scholar]
- Hoyt, W.G.; Slipher, V.M. Biographical Memoirs; National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, USA, 1980; Available online: http://www.nasonline.org/publications/biographical-memoirs/memoir-pdfs/slipher-vesto.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Brémond, A. Vesto Melvin Slipher (1875–1969) et la naissance de l’astrophysique extragalactique. Available online: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/508670/filename/TheseComplete.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Putnam, W.L. The Explorers of Mars Hill: A Centennial History of Lowell Observatory, 1894–1994; Lowell Observatory: Flagstaff, AZ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Shapley, H.; Curtis, H.D. The Scale of the Universe. Bull. Natl. Res. Counc.
**1921**, 2, 171–217. [Google Scholar] - Gott, J.R., III; Jurić, M.; Schlegel, D.; Hoyle, F.; Vogeley, M.; Tegmark, M.; Bahcall, N.; Brinkmann, J. A Map of the Universe. Astrophys. J.
**2005**, 624, 463–484. [Google Scholar] - Shu, F. The Physical Universe, An Introduction to Astronomy; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, USA, 1982; p. 286. Available online: http://apod.nasa.gov/diamond_jubilee/debate.html (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Bartusiak, M. The Day We Found the Universe; Random House Digital: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Trimble, V. The 1920 Shapley-Curtis Discussion: Background, Issues, and Aftermath. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.
**1995**, 107, 1133–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Overbye, D. Lonely Hearts of the Cosmos: The Scientific Quest for the Secrets of the Universe; Harper and Collins: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Hubble’s Famous M31 VAR! Plate. Available online: http://obs.carnegiescience.edu/PAST/m31var (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Öpik, E. An estimate of the distance of the Andromeda Nebula. Astrophys. J.
**1922**, 55, 406–410, Erratum in**1923**, 57, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Slipher, V. Nebulae. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc.
**1917**, 56, 403–409. [Google Scholar] - Eddington, A.S. The Mathematical Theory of Relativity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1923. [Google Scholar]
- Hubble, E. Cepheids in spiral nebulae. Pop. Astron.
**1925**, 33, 252–255. [Google Scholar] - Hubble, E. A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
**1929**, 15, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Hubble, E.P. The Realm of the Nebulae; Dover Pub. Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1958; Available online: https://archive.org/details/TheRealmOfTheNebulae (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Odenwald, S.; Fienberg, R. Redshifts Reconsidered; Sky Pub Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Nussbaumer, H. Einstein’s conversion from his static to an expanding universe. Eur. Phys. J. H
**2014**, 39, 37–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stigler, S.M. Stigler’s Law of Eponymy. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
**1980**, 39, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Friedmann, A. Über die krümmung des raumes. Z. Phys.
**1922**, 10, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Friedmann, A. Über die Möglichkeit einer Welt mit konstanter negativer Krümmung des Raumes. Z. Phys.
**1924**, 21, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wirtz, C.W. Einiges zur Statistik der Radialbewegungen von Spiralnebeln und Kugelsternhaufen. Astron. Nachr.
**1922**, 215, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wirtz, C. De Sitters Kosmologie und die Radialbewegungen der Spiralnebel. Astron. Nachr.
**1924**, 222, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lemaître, G. A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae. Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A
**1927**, 47, 49–59. (In French) [Google Scholar] - Livio, M. Lost in translation: Mystery of the missing text solved. Nature
**2011**, 479, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Einstein, A. Bemerkung zu der Arbeit von A. Friedmann: „Über die Krümmung des Raumes“. Z. Phys.
**1922**, 11, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Einstein, A. Notiz zu der Arbeit von A. Friedmann „Über die Krümmung des Raumes“. Z. Phys.
**1923**, 16, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Eddington, A.S. On the instability of Einstein’s spherical world. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
**1930**, 90, 668–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lemaître, G. Expansion of the universe, The expanding universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
**1931**, 91, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Martin, G.M. Whiskey…Tango…Foxtrot? Available online: https://glenmartin.wordpress.com/2011/11/19/credit-where-credit-is-due/ (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Kragh, H. Big Bang: The etymology of a name. Astron. Geophys.
**2013**, 54, 2–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kragh, H. What’s in a Name: History and Meanings of the Term “Big Bang”. arXiv, 2013; arXiv:1301.0219v2. [Google Scholar]
- Robertson, H.P. Relativistic cosmology. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**1933**, 5, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lemaître, G. The Beginning of the World from the Point of View of Quantum Theory. Nature
**1931**, 127, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dunham, T., Jr.; Adams, W.S. Interstellar neutral potassium and neutral calcium. Pub. Astron. Soc. Pac.
**1937**, 49, 26–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dunham, T., Jr.; Adams, W.S. Pub. Am. Astron. Soc.
**1937**, 9, 5. - Bethe, H.A.; Critchfield, C.L. The Formation of Deuterons by Proton Combination. Phys. Rev.
**1938**, 54, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Von Weizsäcker, C.F. Über Elementumwandlungen in Innern der Sterne II. Phys. Z.
**1938**, 39, 633. [Google Scholar] - Bethe, H.A. Energy Production in Stars. Phys. Rev.
**1939**, 55, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gamow, G. The Origin of Elements and the Separation of Galaxies. Phys. Rev.
**1948**, 74, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gamow, G. The evolution of the universe. Nature
**1948**, 162, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Alpher, R.A.; Herman, R. On the Relative Abundance of the Elements. Phys. Rev.
**1948**, 74, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gamow, G. One, Two, Three…Infinity; Dover, P., Ed.; Revised 1961; Viking Press: New York, NY, USA, 1947. [Google Scholar]
- Alpher, R.A.; Herman, R.C. Evolution of the Universe. Nature
**1948**, 162, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alpher, R.A.; Herman, R.C.; Gamow, G. Thermonuclear reactions in the expanding universe. Phys. Rev.
**1948**, 74, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alpher, R.A.; Herman, R.C. Remarks on the Evolution of the Expanding Universe. Phys. Rev.
**1949**, 75, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hoyle, F. The Synthesis of the Elements from Hydrogen. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
**1946**, 106, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hoyle, F. On Nuclear Reactions Occurring in Very Hot Stars. I. The Synthesis of Elements from Carbon to Nickel. Astrophys. J. Suppl.
**1954**, 1, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Burbidge, E.M.; Burbidge, G.R.; Fowler, W.A.; Hoyle, F. Synthesis of the Elements in Stars. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**1957**, 29, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tolman, R.C. Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1934. [Google Scholar]
- Eddington, A.S. The Nature of the Physical World: Gifford Lectures of 1927, An annonated Edition of H. G. Callaway; Cambridge Scholars Pub.: Newcastle, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- The Gifford Lectures over 100 Years of Lectures on Natural Theology. Available online: https://www.giffordlectures.org/lecturers/arthur-stanley-eddington (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Barrow, J.D. The Book of Universes; Bodley Head: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, R.W. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, Nobel Lecture, 8-12-1978. Available online: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1978/wilson-lecture.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Dicke, R.H.; Peebles, P.J.E.; Roll, P.G.; Wilkinson, D.T. Roll, PG and Wilkinson, DT 1965. Astrophys. J.
**1930**, 142, 14. [Google Scholar] - Penzias, A.A.; Wilson, R.W. A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s. Astrophy. J.
**1965**, 142, 419–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gribbin, J. Stardust Memories. The Independent, 17 June 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Guth, A.H. Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Phys. Rev. D
**1981**, 23, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lifshitz, E.M.; Khalatnikov, I.M. Problems of relativistic cosmology. Sov. Phys. Usp.
**1963**, 6, 495–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lifshitz, E.M.; Khalatnikov, I.M. Investigations in relativistic cosmology. Adv. Phys.
**1963**, 12, 185–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khalatnikov, I.M.; Lifshitz, E.M. General Cosmological Solution of the Gravitational Equations with a Singularity in Time. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1970**, 24, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Belinsky, V.A.; Lifshitz, E.M.; Khalatnikov, I.M. An oscillatory mode of approach to singularities in relativistic cosmology. Usp. Fiz. Nauk
**1970**, 102, 463–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Belinskii, V.A.; Lifshitz, E.M.; Khalatnikov, I.M. Oscillatory approach to the singular point in relativistic cosmology. Sov. Phys. Usp.
**1971**, 13, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Misner, C.W. Mixmaster Universe. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1969**, 22, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Penrose, R. Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1965**, 14, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hawking, S.; Ellis, G.F.R. The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Wald, R.M. General Relativity; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Geroch, R. Local Characterization of Singularities in General Relativity. Ann. Phys.
**1968**, 48, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Garfinkle, D.; Senovilla, J.M.M. The 1965 Penrose singularity theorem. Class. Quantum Gravity
**2015**, 32, 124008. [Google Scholar] - The Beginning of Time. Available online: http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-beginning-of-time.html (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Sato, K. Cosmological baryon number domain structure and the first order phase transition of a vacuum. Phys. Lett. B
**1981**, 33, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Albrecht, A.; Steinhardt, P.J. Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1982**, 48, 1220–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Linde, A.D. Eternally Existing Self-Reproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe. Phys. Lett. B
**1986**, 175, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mukhanov, V.F.; Chibisov, G.V. Quantum fluctuation and “nonsingular” universe. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett.
**1981**, 33, 532–535. [Google Scholar] - Starobinsky, A.A. Spectrum of Relict Gravitational Radiation and The Early State of the Universe. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett.
**1979**, 30, 682–685. [Google Scholar] - Vilenkin, A. Birth of Inflationary Universes. Phys. Rev.
**1983**, D27, 2848–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Borde, A.; Vilenkin, A. Eternal Inflation and the Initial Singularity. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1993**, 72, 3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Borde, A.; Guth, A.; Vilenkin, A. Inflationary Spacetimes Are Incomplete in Past Directions. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2003**, 90, 151301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Correct Interpretation of the Borde Guth Vilenkin (BGV) Theorem? Available online: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/308325/correct-interpretation-of-the-borde-guth-vilenkin-bgv-theorem (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Let the Universe Be the Universe. Available online: http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2012/09/25/let-the-universe-be-the-universe/ (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- The Beginning of the Universe. Available online: http://inference-review.com/article/the-beginning-of-the-universe (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Borde-Guth-Vilenkin Singularity Theorem. Available online: http://creationwiki.org/Borde-Guth-Vilenkin_singularity_theorem (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Borde, Guth, and Vilenkin’s Past-Finite Universe. Available online: https://debunkingwlc.wordpress.com/2010/07/14/borde-guth-vilenkin/ (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- The Borde-Guth-Vilenkin Theorem, and More on the “My Good Friend” Meme. Available online: https://evolutionnews.org/2014/08/the_borde-guth/ (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Did the Universe Begin? III: BGV Theorem. Available online: http://www.wall.org/~aron/blog/did-the-universe-begin-iii-bgv-theorem/ (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Steinhardt, P.J.; Turok, N. A Cyclic Model of the Universe. Science
**2002**, 296, 1436–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Barrow, J.D.; Tipler, F.J. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle; Oxford Paperbacks: Oxford, UK, 1988; p. 612. [Google Scholar]
- Krauss, L.M. A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing; Free Press: Hong Kong, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kohli, I.S. Comments on: A Universe From Nothing. arXiv, 2014; arXiv:1405.6091. [Google Scholar]
- Calcagni, G. Classical and Quantum Cosmology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Huterer, D. Big Bang Theory: The Three Pillars; University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2012; Available online: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~huterer/EPO/HOUSTON_2012/three_pillars_houston.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Ellis, J.; Hagelin, J.S.; Nanopoulos, D.V.; Olive, K.; Srednicki, M. Supersymmetric relics from the big bang. Nucl. Phys. B
**1984**, 238, 453–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gasperini, M.; Veneziano, G. Pre-big-bang in string cosmology. Astropart. Phys.
**1993**, 1, 317–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - The Hot Big Bang Model. Available online: http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/research/gr/public/bb_home.html (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- The History of the Universe. Available online: http://www.astro.cornell.edu/academics/courses/astro201 (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- The Standard Hot Big Bang Model of the Universe. Available online: https://faraday.physics.utoronto.ca/PVB/Harrison/GenRel/BigBangModel.html (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Cosmology: The Hot Big Bang. Available online: https://www.ras.org.uk/publications/other-publications/2040-cosmology-big-bang (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Big Bang Cosmology. Available online: https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_theory.html (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- The Big Bang Model of the Universe. Available online: http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~gmackie/BigBang/universe.htm (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- The Big Bang Model. Available online: http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys240/lectures/bb/bb.html (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Weinberg, S. The First Three Minutes: A Modem View of the Origin of the Universe, 1st ed.; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Weinberg, S. The First Three Minutes: A Modem View of the Origin of the Universe, 2nd ed.; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Peebles, P.J.E.; Schramm, D.N.; Turner, E.L.; Kron, R.G. The case for the relativistic hot Big Bang cosmology. Nature
**1991**, 352, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khoury, J.; Ovrut, B.A.; Steinhardt, P.J.; Turok, N. Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang. Phys. Rev. D
**2001**, 64, 123522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khoury, J.; Ovrut, B.A.; Seiberg, N.; Steinhardt, P.J.; Turok, N. From big crunch to big bang. Phys. Rev. D
**2002**, 65, 086007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Berger, A.L. (Ed.) The Big Bang and Georges Lemaître: Proceedings of a Symposium in honour of G. Lemaître fifty years after his initiation of Big-Bang Cosmology, Louvain-Ia-Neuve, Belgium, 10–13 October 1983; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; p. 9.
- The Growth of Order in the Universe. Available online: http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/layzer/growth_of_order/ (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Barbour, J.; Koslowski, T.; Mercati, F. Identification of a Gravitational Arrow of Time. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2014**, 113, 181101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Aguirre, A.N. The Cosmic Background Radiation in a Cold Big Bang. Astrophys. J.
**2000**, 533, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aguirre, A. Cold big-bang cosmology as a counterexample to several anthropic arguments. Phys. Rev. D
**2001**, 64, 083508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wetterich, C. Hot big bang or slow freeze? Phys. Lett. B
**2014**, 736, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Ashtekar, A.; Pawlowski, T.; Singh, P. Quantum nature of the big bang: Improved dynamics. Phys. Rev. D
**2006**, 74, 084003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Murphy, G.L. Big-Bang Model Without Singularities. Phys. Rev. D
**1973**, 8, 4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - When the End Is Just the Beginning: Exploring Cosmic Cycles. Available online: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2014/08/when-the-end-is-just-the-beginning-exploring-cosmic-cycles/ (accessed on 12 February 2018).
- Caldwell, R.R. A Phantom Menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state. Phys. Lett. B
**2002**, 545, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Caldwell, R.R.; Kamionkowski, M.; Weinberg, N.N. Phantom Energy: Dark Energy with w < −1 Causes a Cosmic Doomsday. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2003**, 91, 071301. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] - Barrow, J.D. Sudden future singularities. Class. Quantum Gravity
**2004**, 21, L79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Barrow, J.D. More general sudden singularities. Class. Quantum Gravity
**2004**, 21, 5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bouhmadi-Lopez, M.; Gonzalez-Diaz, P.F.; Martin-Moruno, P. Worse than a big rip? Phys. Lett. B
**2008**, 659, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Tsujikawa, S. Properties of singularities in (phantom) dark energy universe. Phys. Rev. D
**2005**, 71, 063004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Barrow, J.D.; Galloway, G.J.; Tipler, F.J. The closed-universe recollapse conjecture. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
**1986**, 223, 835–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Frampton, P.H.; Ludwick, K.J.; Scherrer, R.J. The little rip. Phys. Rev. D
**2011**, 84, 063003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brevik, I.; Elizalde, E.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Viscous little rip cosmology. Phys. Rev. D
**2011**, 84, 103508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Elizalde, E.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Late-time cosmology in (phantom) scalar-tensor theory: Dark energy and the cosmic speed-up. Phys. Rev. D
**2004**, 70, 043539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Elizalde, E.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Sáez-Gómez, D. Unifying inflation with dark energy in modified F(R) Horava-Lifshitz gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C
**2010**, 70, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Elizalde, E.; Myrzakulov, R.; Obukhov, V.V.; Sáez-Gómez, D. LambdaCDM epoch reconstruction from F(R,G) and modified Gauss-Bonnet gravities. Class. Quant. Grav.
**2010**, 27, 095007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cognola, G.; Elizalde, E.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Sebastiani, L.; Zerbini, S. Class of viable modified f(R) gravities describing inflation and the onset of accelerated expansion. Phys. Rev. D
**2008**, 77, 046009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Briscese, F.; Elizalde, E.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Phantom scalar dark energy as modified gravity: Understanding the origin of the Big Rip singularity. Phys. Lett. B
**2007**, 464, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dabrowski, M.P.; Denkiewicz, T. Barotropic index w-singularities in cosmology. Phys. Rev. D
**2009**, 79, 063521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fernández-Jambrina, L. w-cosmological singularities. Phys. Rev. D
**2010**, 82, 124004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Beltrán Jiménez, J.; Rubiera-Garcia, D.; Sáez-Gómez, D.; Salzano, V. Cosmological future singularities in interacting dark energy models. Phys. Rev. D
**2016**, 94, 123520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dabrowski, M.P. Are Singularities the Limits of Cosmology? In Mathematical Structures of the Universe; Eckstein, M., Heller, M., Szybka, S.J., Eds.; Copernicus Center Press: Krakow, Poland, 2014; pp. 99–117. [Google Scholar]
- Dabrowski, M.P.; Denkiewicz, T. Exotic-singularity-driven dark energy. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference “Invisible Universe”, Paris, France, 29 June–3 July 2009; Melville: New York, NY, USA, 2010; Volume 1241, pp. 561–570. [Google Scholar]

1 | This being one of the reason why it is my inescapable duty to explain all that here with such emphasis. |

2 | Theoretical cosmologists may, alternatively, consider the year 1915, when Einstein completed his formulation of the gravity field equations, incorporating his revolutionary principle of equivalence, as the one actually marking the beginning of modern cosmology. This is, in particular, the opinion of one of the referees of the present paper. Indeed, the moment Einstein had his “most happy thought” unveiling the relativistic role of the equivalence principle is another seminal event from which the whole theoretical framework stems. Furthermore, the expansion of the universe was first apparent in the work of Friedmann, and partly on de Sitter’s 1917 contributions. I am myself a theoretician, and although I recognize that GR is probably the most beautiful and transcendental theory of physics ever conceived and constructed, I still stand by my opinion, as expressed above; which is also supported by the fact that the very important developments of 1912 preceded those of 1915 and 1917. |

3 | Andrzej Wróblewski brings to my attention the two papers by Carl Wirtz [42,43], of 1922–24, where he derived a linear relation of recession of spiral nebulae with their distance. Wirtz used the assumption that all galaxies have approximately the same size and estimated their relative distance from their apparent diameters. For unknown reasons, Wirtz’s papers were not noticed or soon forgotten (although they are certainly mentioned by historians of astronomy). |

4 | After completion of Version 1 of the present paper, I got through a very interesting preprint [51,52], which presents a nice account of names and concepts associated with finite-age cosmological models from the 1920s to the 1970s, including the many meanings of the Big Bang name. This reference is quite complementary to what I am describing here; it does not go, however, in any detail, into the most crucial point of the actual meaning of a Big Bang in the Theory of General Relativity, which is the essential issue in this section. |

5 | It is to be mentioned that there were at the time other competing models of the cosmos, as, e.g., the interesting contribution of H.P. Robertson [53]. |

6 | John Barrow has told me that he had always suspected that the term ‘Big Bang’ had been remembered in Cambridge, before that episode, from its use by Eddington in his book “The Nature of the Physical World” [71], based on his famous Gifford Lectures of 1927 at the University of Edinburgh [72] (probably the most famous public lecture series in the world then). Eddington writes, “As a scientist, I simply do not believe that the Universe began with a bang”; see also [73], pp. 123–318. Furthermore, according to Barrow, Eddington had a more sophisticated view of the origin of the Universe than others, and he regarded the Eddington–Lemaître models, which are geometrically past eternal, as having a finite thermodynamic age because only a finite number of non-equilibrium events would have happened in the past. |

7 | In particular, very few realize the radical difference between a ‘bang’ and the ‘Big Bang’ concept, in spite of the fact that (or maybe precisely because) everybody knows what ‘big’ means. That a bang was necessary at the origin of the world was naturally understood by everybody accepting Hubble’s law, and this included many cosmologists of the time (and a lot of educated people nowadays). In this precise way was it used in Cambridge (see the previous footnote, reflecting Barrow’s interesting observation). However, it turns out that ‘the Big Bang’ in the sense of Hoyle is not just a Big Bang in the common sense, namely of a very huge bang of the ordinary sort, giving the objects in the Universe a very large recession speed. The crucial point is that of matter creation (since the objects were not there to start with), almost instantly, in a very brief inflationary process (as it is called now) at the very origin of the cosmos. I hope this is clear already. |

8 | |

9 | See also [141], where this type of sudden and other finite time singularities were first introduced in order to show that closed Friedmann universes need not collapse even if they satisfy the strong energy condition; although the terminology ‘sudden singularity’ was introduced by Barrow in 2004, as already mentioned. |

© 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Elizalde, E.
“All that Matter … in One Big Bang …”, &Other Cosmological Singularities. *Galaxies* **2018**, *6*, 25.
https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6010025

**AMA Style**

Elizalde E.
“All that Matter … in One Big Bang …”, &Other Cosmological Singularities. *Galaxies*. 2018; 6(1):25.
https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6010025

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Elizalde, Emilio.
2018. "“All that Matter … in One Big Bang …”, &Other Cosmological Singularities" *Galaxies* 6, no. 1: 25.
https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6010025