Previous Article in Journal
Association of oXiris® Therapy with Lower Vasopressor Requirements and Modulation of Hemodynamic, Inflammatory, and Perfusion Markers in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Degni et al. Safety of Primary Tracheoesophageal Puncture in Patients Submitted to Enlarged Total Laryngectomy with Pectoralis Major Reconstruction. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 435

1
Division of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
2
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
3
Speech and Language Therapy Department, School of Health Sciences, Cappadocia University, 50420 Mustafapasa Urgup, Turkey
4
Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
5
Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Department of Head and Neck and Sensory Organs, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito, 00168 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(12), 627; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15120627 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 4 December 2025 / Accepted: 9 December 2025 / Published: 15 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Personalized Therapy in Clinical Medicine)

Figure Legend

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 3. Specifically, the color coding in the bar plots was inverted: “Fistula” was displayed in grey instead of blue, and “No fistula” was displayed in blue instead of grey. The same inversion occurred for the remaining three postoperative complications represented in Figure 3.
The correct Figure 3 legend appears below:
Figure 3. Analysis of the impact of the reconstructive procedure on the different complications and sequelae in patients undergoing primary voice prosthesis placement. According to the present data, the reconstruction with pectoralis major is not associated with any of the most common complications/sequelae. Each plot represents a grouped proportional bar chart, built from contingency tables comparing the incidence of post-surgical complications between patients who underwent flap reconstruction and those who did not. For each complication, the x-axis indicates the presence or absence of flap use (“Flap Use”: Yes/No), while the y-axis represents the percentage of patients within each flap group. Each vertical bar is divided into segments corresponding to the outcomes of the postoperative variable (e.g., “Fistula” vs. “No Fistula”), and the height of each segment reflects its relative proportion within the flap group.
Figure 3. Analysis of the impact of the reconstructive procedure on the different complications and sequelae in patients undergoing primary voice prosthesis placement. According to the present data, the reconstruction with pectoralis major is not associated with any of the most common complications/sequelae. Each plot represents a grouped proportional bar chart, built from contingency tables comparing the incidence of post-surgical complications between patients who underwent flap reconstruction and those who did not. For each complication, the x-axis indicates the presence or absence of flap use (“Flap Use”: Yes/No), while the y-axis represents the percentage of patients within each flap group. Each vertical bar is divided into segments corresponding to the outcomes of the postoperative variable (e.g., “Fistula” vs. “No Fistula”), and the height of each segment reflects its relative proportion within the flap group.
Jpm 15 00627 g003

Error in Table

In the original publication [1], there were some mistakes in Table 1 as published.
  • Pharyngocutaneous Fistula, n (%): The percentage reported for “Yes” has been corrected from “3.0%” to “6.0%”; (%): the percentage reported for “No” has been corrected from “94.1%” to “94.0%”.
  • Relapse, n (%): The percentage reported for relapse cases was based on a preliminary version of the dataset and did not reflect the final validated data used for the statistical analyses. This discrepancy was also evident in the subsequent section, “Pattern of Relapse, n (%)”, where the total number of relapse cases did not match the value shown in the table. Specifically, the number and percentage of “Yes” has been corrected from “11 (11.1%)” to “6 (6.0%)”; the number and percentage of “No” has been corrected from “88 (88.9%)” to “95 (94.0%)”.
  • pStage, n (%): The percentages reported for stages II, III, IVA, and IVB were incorrectly calculated in the published version. Specifically, the percentage of stage II has been corrected from “13.87%” to “14.0%”; the percentage of stage III has been corrected from “28.7%” to “29.0%”; the percentage of stage IVA has been corrected from “39.6%” to “39.0%”; the percentage of stage IVB has been corrected from “13.9%” to “14.0%”.
The corrected Table 1 appears below:
Table 1. Descriptive statistics.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics.
Descriptive ItemSummary
Demographics
Age at TL (years), Mean ± SD67.6 ± 9.6
Age at TL, Median (Range)67 (47–86)
Sex, n (%)
   Male87 (86.1%)
   Female14 (13.9%)
Clinical History
Alcohol Use, n (%)
   Current53 (52.5%)
   Former15 (14.9%)
   Never23 (22.8%)
   Unknown10 (9.9%)
Smoking Status, n (%)
   Current46 (45.5%)
   Former46 (45.5%)
   Never3 (3.0%)
   Unknown6 (6.0%)
Primary Total Laryngectomy, n (%)91 (90.0%)
Salvage Laryngectomy, n (%)10 (10.0%)
   Non-Surgical Organ Preservation7 (7.0%)
   Surgical Organ Preservation3 (3.0%)
Tumor Characteristics
Site of Primary Tumor, n (%)
   Glottic Larynx46 (45.5%)
   Supraglottic Larynx39 (38.6%)
   Hypopharynx12 (11.9%)
   Subglottic Larynx4 (4.0%)
pTN Staging, n (%)
   pT1b4 (4.0%)
   pT221 (20.8%)
   pT335 (34.6%)
   pT4a41 (40.6%)
   pN059 (58.4%)
   pN115 (14.9%)
   pN2a1 (1.0%)
   pN2b6 (5.9%)
   pN2c6 (5.9%)
   pN3b14 (13.9%)
Margins, n (%)
   R092 (91.1%)
   R16 (5.9%)
   Close3 (3.0%)
pStage, n (%)
   I3 (3.0%)
   II14 (14.0%)
   III29 (29.0%)
   IVA40 (39.0%)
   IVB14 (14.0%)
   IVC1 (1.0%)
Surgery
Enlarged Laryngectomy, n (%)
   Hypopharynx17 (16.9%)
   Base of Tongue4 (3.9%)
   Skin1 (1.0%)
   Trachea1 (1.0%)
   No78 (77.2%)
Closure, n (%)
   Pectoralis Major17 (16.8%)
   Primary Closure84 (83.2%)
Pectoralis Flap Variant, n (%)
   Myocutaneous7 (6.9%)
   Myofascial10 (9.9%)
Voice Prosthesis, n (%)
   Yes78 (77.2%)
   No23 (22.8%)
Neck Dissection, n (%)
   Yes100 (99.0%)
   No1 (1.0%)
Adjuvant treatment, n (%)
   Radiochemotherapy40 (39.6%)
   Radiotherapy15 (14.9%)
   No Adjuvant46 (45.5%)
Postoperative Complications and Sequelae
Pharyngocutaneous Fistula, n (%)
   Yes6 (6.0%)
   No95 (94.0%)
Postoperative Bleeding, n (%)
   Yes5 (5.0%)
   No96 (95.0%)
Dysphagia, n (%)
   Yes11 (10.9%)
   No90 (89.1%)
Dysphagia Needing Treatment, n (%)
   Yes2 (2.0%)
   No99 (98.0%)
Outcomes
Follow-up (months)Mean ± SD: 44.6 ± 3.2; Median: 41 (4–93)
Overall Survival (5-year OS)36.6%
   Alive65 (64.4%)
   Deceased36 (35.6%)
Disease-Specific Survival (5-year DSS)83.9%
Relapse-Free Survival (5-year RFS)90.8%
Relapse, n (%)
   Yes6 (6.0%)
   No95 (94.0%)
Pattern of Relapse, n (%)
   Locoregional2 (2.0%)
   Locoregional and Distant1 (1.0%)
   Regional3 (3.0%)
   No Relapse95 (94.0%)
Second Primary Tumor (SPT), n (%)
   Yes19 (18.8%)
   No82 (81.2%)
Descriptive statistics including demographic data, clinical history, tumor characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications of the study population, and oncologic outcomes.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Degni, E.; Lai, S.; Ciccarelli, C.C.; Yesilli Puzella, G.; Crescio, C.; Tropiano, P.; Fois, V.; Parrilla, C.; Galli, J.; Bussu, F. Safety of Primary Tracheoesophageal Puncture in Patients Submitted to Enlarged Total Laryngectomy with Pectoralis Major Reconstruction. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Degni, E.; Lai, S.; Ciccarelli, C.C.; Yesilli Puzella, G.; Crescio, C.; Tropiano, P.; Fois, V.; Parrilla, C.; Galli, J.; Bussu, F. Correction: Degni et al. Safety of Primary Tracheoesophageal Puncture in Patients Submitted to Enlarged Total Laryngectomy with Pectoralis Major Reconstruction. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 435. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15120627

AMA Style

Degni E, Lai S, Ciccarelli CC, Yesilli Puzella G, Crescio C, Tropiano P, Fois V, Parrilla C, Galli J, Bussu F. Correction: Degni et al. Safety of Primary Tracheoesophageal Puncture in Patients Submitted to Enlarged Total Laryngectomy with Pectoralis Major Reconstruction. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 435. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2025; 15(12):627. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15120627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Degni, Emilia, Sebastiana Lai, Carlo Camillo Ciccarelli, Gamze Yesilli Puzella, Claudia Crescio, Paolo Tropiano, Valeria Fois, Claudio Parrilla, Jacopo Galli, and Francesco Bussu. 2025. "Correction: Degni et al. Safety of Primary Tracheoesophageal Puncture in Patients Submitted to Enlarged Total Laryngectomy with Pectoralis Major Reconstruction. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 435" Journal of Personalized Medicine 15, no. 12: 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15120627

APA Style

Degni, E., Lai, S., Ciccarelli, C. C., Yesilli Puzella, G., Crescio, C., Tropiano, P., Fois, V., Parrilla, C., Galli, J., & Bussu, F. (2025). Correction: Degni et al. Safety of Primary Tracheoesophageal Puncture in Patients Submitted to Enlarged Total Laryngectomy with Pectoralis Major Reconstruction. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 435. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 15(12), 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15120627

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop