Next Article in Journal
The Rationale for Vitamin, Mineral, and Cofactor Treatment in the Precision Medical Care of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Next Article in Special Issue
White Matter Hyperintensities in Young Patients from a Neurological Outpatient Clinic: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Correlation with Enlarged Perivascular Spaces
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health and Quality of Life in COVID-19 Department Healthcare Workers in Central Greece
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predicting a Favorable (mRS 0–2) or Unfavorable (mRS 3–6) Stroke Outcome by Arterial Spin Labeling and Amide Proton Transfer Imaging in Post-Thrombolysis Stroke Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JPM
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/jpm13020251
Review Report
jpm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Fusing Multiview Functional Brain Networks by Joint Embedding for Brain Disease Identification

J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(2), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020251
by Chengcheng Wang 1, Limei Zhang 2,*, Jinshan Zhang 3, Lishan Qiao 1 and Mingxia Liu 4,*
Reviewer 1:
Zahid Ullah
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(2), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020251
Submission received: 12 November 2022 / Revised: 27 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Imaging and Personalized Medicine in Neuropsychiatric Disorders)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper addresses an important problem and achieves meaningful results. However, the main weakness of the paper lies in its lack of originality and novelty. The following suggestions may be considered to enhance the quality and clarity of the manuscript.

1-  Abstract is comprehensive and well written, but it needs improvements e.g. case study can be described a little more at the end of the paragraph.

2- The motivation is not clear. Why did this work? Is any problem does it address that the previous methods cannot?

3- This area is rapidly evolving, and new papers have been published. Therefore, some state-of-the-art (i.e., of 2022) papers should be taken into account: 

https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/6/2222

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306987720308689

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025522007332

4- In the related works, existing studies can also be summarized in a tabular form to improve readability

5- Novelty of the algorithm needs to be incorporated

6-  The authors provided all experimental details for reproducing the results. But it seems that the comparison of experiments is not satisfactory. Please compare your results with some state-of-the-art studies in a separate table.

 

7-  Language also needs improvement

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The work reported by Wang et al represents an important addition to the literature that presents a multi-view FBNs fusion strategy. I recommend publishing after addressing the points below:

1. The introduction lacked citations of adequate references to give readers sufficient background on the topic.

2. The quality of Fig. 1 needs to be improved.

3. Text size needs to be increased in Fig. 2 and 3

4. Can the authors include error bars to the data presented in Fig. 4?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors

Congratulations on your work. Your manuscript is very well written and easy to follow and understand. I found it a very interesting approach. 

Best regards, 

Author Response

 Thank you for this valuable comment. 

Back to TopTop