Next Article in Journal
The Role of Surgical Axillary Staging Prior to Immediate Breast Reconstruction in the Era of De-Escalation of Axillary Management in Early Breast Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Stomatognathic System Changes in Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Mental Health Literacy Educational Programme for Junior High School Students: A Randomised Controlled Trial Examining Changes in Their Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour
Previous Article in Special Issue
Machine Learning Models for Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Prediction in Hospitalized Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JPM
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/jpm12081282
jpm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Probiotics and Gut Microbiota in Obesity: Myths and Realities of a New Health Revolution

by
Xavier Eugenio León Aguilera
1,
Alexander Manzano
2,
Daniela Pirela
2 and
Valmore Bermúdez
1,3,*
1
Departamento de Post-Grado, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Ciudad Cuenca 010109, Ecuador
2
Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo 4002, Venezuela
3
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla 080022, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(8), 1282; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081282
Submission received: 6 July 2022 / Revised: 31 July 2022 / Accepted: 1 August 2022 / Published: 4 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the 2nd Conference with International Participation “Basic Research in Endocrinology: A Modern Strategy for the Development and Technologies of Personalized Medicine”)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Obesity and its comorbidities are humans’ most prevalent cardio-metabolic diseases worldwide. Recent evidence has shown that chronic low-grade inflammation is a common feature in all highly prevalent chronic degenerative diseases. In this sense, the gut microbiota is a complete ecosystem involved in different processes like vitamin synthesis, metabolism regulation, and both appetite and immune system control. Thus, dysbiosis has been recognised as one of the many factors associated with obesity due to a predominance of Firmicutes, a decrease in Bifidobacterium in the gut, and a consequent short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) synthesis reduction leading to a reduction in incretins action and intestinal permeability increase. In this context, bacteria, bacterial endotoxins, and toxic bacterial by-products are translocated to the bloodstream, leading to systemic inflammation. This review focuses on gut microbiota composition and its role in obesity, as well as probiotics and prebiotics benefits in obesity.

1. Introduction

Obesity is a chronic, complex, endocrine-metabolic disease that is a significant risk factor for numerous comorbidities [1]. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) have shown that obesity prevalence in the United States increased from 30.5% in 1999–2000 to 42.4% in 2017–2018 [2], a fact that is conveyed in healthcare costs, not only in the USA but in many countries with Westernized lifestyles [3,4,5].
Some risk factors such as daily calories ingested, socioeconomic level, place of residence (urban or rural), sex, age, physical activity, diet quality, and behavioural disorders [6], among many others [7], drive obesity development throughout life in connection with genetic factors. Thus, scientific evidence has been accumulating regarding gut microbiota (dysbiosis) alterations can play a central role in the onset and further development of obesity, leading to coin the term “obese microbiota”, as that microscopic community of the distal digestive tract that swifts away from its typical architecture [8]. In this vein, the gut microbiota refers to the microorganism population that usually inhabits the intestinal lumen, which plays a pivotal role in the physiology, pathophysiology, and evolution of multiple diseases such as diabetes mellitus [9], irritable bowel syndrome [10], Parkinson’s disease [11], bronchial asthma [12], and even obesity [13], probably mediated by anti-inflammatory and immune response regulators metabolites [14,15]. Moreover, a significant proportion of individuals with obesity exhibit variations in their gut microbiota. There is scientific evidence enough to support that dysbiosis and inflammation play a pivotal role in many gastrointestinal and metabolic diseases, particularly obesity [16].
This review aims to briefly examine the intestinal microbiota structure, metabolism, and possible changes in obesity and the potential link with the endocrine-metabolic disorders usually associated with this condition. In addition, a critical analysis of first- and second-generation probiotics’ usefulness in obesity management is presented, as well as promising innovations in dysbiosis therapy and their possible impact on obesity prevention and treatment.

2. Structure of the Human Gut Microbiota

The microbiota refers to the set of bacteria, fungi, and viruses found in different tissues that, although individual, have a common characteristic in most microorganisms for a particular host. Eubiosis occurs when microbiota microorganisms are functional compositional and ecologically in equilibrium with the host [17]. The human microbiota comprises nearly 10,000 microorganism species and sub-species [18], with the gut microbiome containing over nine million genes [19]. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia are the main microorganisms in the gut microbiota, with a clear predominance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes representing 90% of the human gut microbiota [20].
The phylum Firmicutes comprises Gram-positive endospores-forming bacteria and a genome with low DNA G + C content [21]. More than 200 genera, including Lactobacillus, Bacillus, Clostridium, Enterococcus, and Ruminicoccus, have rigid or semi-rigid walls, with Clostridium accounting for 95% of them [22]. The phylum Actinobacteria, which consists of Gram-positive, branched, non-motile, non-spore-forming microorganisms, is the least predominant at the intestinal level and is represented by the genus Bifidobacterium [23] and plays a vital role in the colonisation of the digestive tract of children born by vaginal delivery, conversely, it is significantly less in those born by cesarean section [24]. On the other hand, the phylum Bacteroidetes is composed of Gram-negative bacteria of Bacteroides and Prevotella genera [20], playing as primary polysaccharide processors [25] and whose final products are substrates for enzymes from other bacterial genera that eventually participate in the immune system regulation [26], intermediary metabolism [27] and intestinal–brain axis signalling [28,29,30]. Bacteria such as Lactobacillus (Firmicutes) and Bifidobacterium (Actinobacteria) hydrolyse and ferment very specific polysaccharides to produce the short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) acetate, butyrate, and propionate (Figure 1) [31]. In this regard, propionate is produced mainly by Akkermansia muciniphila, whereas butyrate is produced by Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Eubacterium hallii, and Eubacterium rectale [32].

3. Are the SCFA the Missing Link between Dysbiosis and Obesity?

SCFAs are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) ligands, activating anti-inflammatory signaling cascades [33]. In addition, SCFA may also act by preserving intestinal integrity [34], reducing luminal pH [35,36], protecting intestinal lining, especially the luminal mucopolysaccharide layer [37], and regulating GAP and tight junction expression.
Although diffusion of short-chain fatty acids in their neutral (undissociated) form is an important absorption mechanism, anionic form uptake by transporter proteins is the main route for SCFA translocation across the cell membrane. Several transport systems have been described for SCFA transport in colonocytes: MCT1 (SLC16A1) and MCT4 (SLC16A3) are H+ coupled electroneutral transporter. MCT1 is expressed in the apical and basolateral membrane of the colonic epithelium, whereas MCT4 is specifically expressed in the basolateral membrane. SMCT1 (SLC5A8) is a Na+ a coupled electrogenic transporter [38], whilst SMCT2 (SLC5A12) is a Na+ a coupled transporter but electroneutral. SMCT1 and SMCT2 are expressed exclusively at the apical membrane [39,40]. Finally, an anion exchange mechanism coupled to bicarbonate efflux has been reported in the literature, but their identification and isolation have remained elusive. As a result of these mechanisms, SCFAs are efficiently absorbed across the colonocyte apical membrane in approximately 90–95% [41].
The downstream SCFA effects are mediated, at least in part, by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition [42] downstream and thus decrease pro-inflammatory cytokine production. In addition, other essential functions of SCFA involve the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha activation, increasing the substitution of old cells by renewed epithelial colonic cells [43] and the induction of IL-10 in T cells, as well as increasing the antibodies production through B cells differentiation into plasma cells [44] improving the adaptative immunity response [45]. In addition, factors such as SCFA speed, volume, and acetate/propionic/butyric ratio bring a complex interplay between fermentable diet polysaccharides, microbiome diversity and activity, and, eventually, the gut transit time.
It is well-known that fermentable carbohydrate consumption and SCFA administration produce a wide range of health benefits, including body composition improvement, increased insulin sensitivity, a low-risk lipid profile, body weight reduction, and cancer risk reduction as colon cancer. In the same vein, SCFA also plays an essential role in obesity pathophysiology by intermediary metabolism regulation and appetite control [46], at least, in part, by stimulating the incretins synthesis and secretion by entero-endocrine L cells, a specific butyrate-mediated effect [47,48]. Thus, an interesting group of scientific papers conducted in humans by Chambers et al. [49] using soluble fiber as inulin propionate-ester demonstrated an appetite and food intake attenuating effect mediated by propionate. Other studies from the same group have found equivalent results regarding food choice [50], improving pancreatic function and modulation of liver lipid metabolism. Moreover, oral propionate administration increases fat oxidation in humans regarding energetic metabolism regulation. Finally, in experimental models, propionate reduces food intake via the gut–brain axis in animals [51]. This evidence highlights an SCFA-rich diet’s importance in managing obesity and associated diseases, including hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. For instance, the butyrate induces renal prorenin receptors and renin expression, attenuating the angiotensin-II effects [52], and acetate and propionate regulate renin production via Olfr78 and a counter-regulation loop with FFAR3 [53] (Figure 2).

4. Molecular Basis of Intestinal, Immunological, and Metabolic Homeostasis Control by Gut Microbiota

Dietary fiber is a sundry group of complex carbohydrates affecting human metabolism and gut microbiota [54]. Arabinoxylans (AX) are cell wall components that constitute a significant part of the dietary fiber fraction found in cereals and represent a significant fiber source in the human diet [55]. These heteroxylans, especially AX, deserve special attention with cellulose, β-1,3;1,4-glucan, arabinogalactan peptide, and lignin, as they are the major components of fiber in cereals [56].
Bifidobacteria metabolise non-digestible carbohydrates to produce acetate and lactate. Some studies have screened for genes encoding several putative AXOS-degrading enzymes in a wide Bifidobacteria variety species, but no clear correlation has been made regarding these polysaccharides’ degradation [57,58]. The primary site for inulin fermentation is the ascending colon. In contrast, AXOS fermentation occurs in the transverse colon [59], and Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, and Roseburia have been identified as the main fermenting species of these carbohydrates (Figure 3) [60].
A high-fat diet has been established to increase Clostridia and Bifidobacteria gut population and decrease Bacteroides. However, there is also a significant influence on bile acid metabolism [61], highlighting its potential impact on dysbiosis, which might lead to changes in SCFA metabolism due to Bifidobacteria decrease.

5. Microbiota in Obesity: Cause, Effect, or Both?

Dysbiosis refers to the alteration of normal bacterial microbiota [62]. Several environmental factors affecting gut microbiota are closely associated with dysbiosis and obesity [63]. Overall, these factors increase Firmicutes species such as Eubacterium rectale, Clostridium coccoides, Lactobacillus reuteri, Clostridium histolyticum, and Staphylococcus aureus [64]. On the other hand, a significant decrease in the relative abundance of several Bacteroidetes taxa members such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bacteroidetes, Methanobrevibacter smithii, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus paracasei, L. rhamnosus, and Verrucomicrobia (Akkermansia muciniphila) have been reported [16,65]. Depending on the microbiota alteration, dysbiosis can be produced by the loss of beneficial microbial organisms, overgrowth of potentially harmful microorganisms, or general microbial diversity loss [66]. Thus, obesity microbiota is characterised by a significant Firmicutes increase and a 50% decrease in Bacteroidetes at the terminal ileum [67]. It was also reported that Lactobacillus reuiteri and Lactobacillus sakei are directly related to weight gain in adults, mainly in conjunction with a high-fat diet consumption [68], while on the other hand, microorganisms of the Bifidobacterium genus decrease the comorbidities associated with obesity, such as metabolic syndrome [69].
High-fat and high-carbohydrate diet consumption leads to Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Akkermansia deficit with a considerable increase in Clostridium and Prevotella driving Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) activation via lipopolysaccharides pathway triggering to inflammation and claudin 1 and 3 expression decrease [70]. Claudin is a family of 18 proteins that play essential structural and functional roles in determining tight junction structure and permeability. Therefore, a reduction in these protein’s expression via SCFA levels decrease alters the integrity gut epithelial barrier, causing bacterial translocation and expression of inflammatory cytokines [71] such as TNFα and interleukin-1 [72], increasing Gram-negative bacteria adherence to the intestinal epithelium [73], leading to a chronic pro-inflammatory state that triggers obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities [74]. Furthermore, it has been recognised that high-glucose or fructose rich-foods produce microbiota dysbiosis, also affecting intestinal permeability and inducing hepatic steatosis [75], while on the other hand, glutamine, vitamin A, vitamin D, and dietary fibre preserve intestinal permeability by increasing the production of butyrate and propionate [76].

6. Are Probiotics Effective in Endocrine-Metabolic Disease Treatment? Are These Supplements Effective in Intestinal Dysbiosis?

According to The World Health Organization, probiotics are “Live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host” [77]. In this area of intense development, scientific evidence has been accumulated, influencing the appearance of new, rich, and sophisticated terminology. Since it has been shown that inactivated, non-viable, or broken probiotics have beneficial effects on health, the term paraprobiotics has been incorporated, including the true probiotics (functional), pseudoprobiotics (inactive), and phantom probiotics (non-viable or broken) [78]. Thus, a true probiotic, for instance, Lactobacillus plantarum improves IL-10 in the colon [79] by adhering to the gut epithelium. Lactobacillus rhamnousus, adhering to the epithelium and, in this case, also producing lactic acid [80]; Lactobacillus acidophilus is found at the intestinal level and whose mechanism of action is by lactacin production and further cholesterol adherence [81]. Bifidobacterium animalis increase intestinal motility and bile salts hydrolysis [82]. Furthermore, Saccharomyces boullardii redistributes T cells in vitro (Table 1) [83].
There is a growing body of evidence that probiotics improve, maintain, or restore the intestinal microbiota, a critical action because obesity has been linked to dysbiosis [84], thus opening the door to innovative manoeuvres directed to microbiota architecture and diversity.

7. Efficacy of Probiotics in Obesity and Its Comorbidities: Fiction or Reality?

The benefit of probiotics in overweight and obese patients has long been controversial. However, most research suggests limited health benefits, so they are only recommended as adjuvant therapy for cardiovascular disease biomarkers reduction [85].
In this regard, a meta-analysis by Koutnikova et al. on 105 trials assessing the probiotic’s efficacy in obese patients concluded that while probiotics improved BMI and weight by 3–5%, there was no statistically significant effect on HbA1c, cholesterol, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, or liver function [86]. Conversely, a recent meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by Tabrizi et al., assessing probiotic effectiveness on clinical symptoms, weight loss, glycemic control, blood lipids, endocrine profiles, inflammation biomarkers, and oxidative stress tests in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, found improvements in women consuming probiotics related to weight, BMI, FPG, insulin, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, VLDL-cholesterol, C reactive proteín, malondialdehyde, hirsutism, total testosterone, QUICKI, nitric oxide, total antioxidant capacity, reduced glutathione, and sexual hormones binding globulin. However, it did not find changes in dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels and total cholesterol, LDL, and HDL cholesterol levels in patients with PCOS [87].
Similarly, a meta-analysis by Lau et al. evaluated the probiotic effect on obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in 38,802 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data between 1999 and 2014. In this research, Probiotic ingestion was considered when a subject reported yoghurt consumption or when a commercial probiotic supplemented it during the 24-h dietary recall or the Dietary Supplement use 30-Day questionnaire. This study found a 13.1% reported probiotic ingestion in the participants. The prevalence of obesity and hypertension was lower in the probiotic group (obesity-adjusted Odds Ratio (OR): 0.84, 95% CI 0.76–0.92, p < 0.001; hypertension-adjusted OR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.71–0.88, p < 0.001). Accordingly, even after analytic adjustments, body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the probiotic group, as were systolic and diastolic blood pressure and triglycerides; high-density lipoprotein (HDL) was significantly higher in the probiotic group for the adjusted model [88].
In an interesting meta-analysis conducted by Kim et al. with data from 1953 and 2018, including 246 obese cases and 198 normal controls, the primary goal was to determine whether SCFA levels differ between obese and non-obese individuals and determine their faecal microbiota structure. This study found differences in the levels of SCFAs in faeces between obese cases and non-obese controls. The findings show that individuals with obesity had higher acetate, propionate, and butyrate faecal levels. In addition, this study found that obese individuals had low bacterial abundance in faeces regarding microbiota architecture, but the differences were not statistically significant. The meta-regression analysis demonstrated that the abundance of the phylum Firmicutes was positively associated with obesity for individuals 37 years or younger, while the Bacteroidetes abundance was negatively associated with obesity for 47 or younger participants.

8. Prebiotics, the Cornerstone of Gut Microbiota

Since the prebiotic concept has experienced a continuous evolution over decades, the classic definition proposed by Gibson et al. is “a non-digestible food ingredient that beneficially affects the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of one or a limited number of bacteria in the colon, thereby improving host’s health” [89] still being useful to understand the fundamental properties of this substances. This concept has become more sophisticated to include noncarbohydrate substances affecting the colonisation of beneficial bacteria within our microbiota. Prebiotics are non-digestible oligosaccharides with diverse chemical structures and functions, differing in molecular weight, monosaccharide type, origin (vegetables, fruits, among others), and branching degree. Prebiotics are currently a new and flourishing research area with a profound impact as modulators of gut microbiota and their effects on cancer, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, type 2 diabetes, response to chemotherapy, immune modulation, and obesity, among others. Prebiotics exert beneficial effects based on stimulating the growth of colon probiotics and beneficial taxons with many anti-inflammatory capacities and in their catabolic products, especially butyrate, which can carry out a diverse and complex cell cycle regulation in colonic cell tumour, leading towards their apoptosis [90].
Prebiotics has demonstrated their usefulness in regulating satiety by increasing GLP-1 and PYY [91], as well as decreasing ghrelin secretion [92], which results in a reduction in food intake and consequent weight loss [93]. Nutritionally, AX are the main component of dietary fiber, and their enzymatic hydrolysis produces AXOS and XOS; which, when cereal-based foods, such as bread and beer, are consumed, exhibit all of the characteristics of prebiotics, including resistance to gastric acidity, fermentation by the intestinal microbiota, and selective stimulation of the growth or activity of beneficial bacteria [55]. As a result, AXOS and XOS selectively stimulate Bifidobacterium, which stops the increase in cholesterol, triglycerides, postprandial glucose, and insulin levels [94].

9. Concluding Remarks

Humans have not escaped from the co-evolution with the vast microbial community residing in our bodies. As a superorganism, the mammalian gut is an excellent niche for microbes because of its constant temperature, predictable humidity, pH, and steady food supply. In return, the microbes perform a pleiad of functions ranging from vitamin production to immune system regulation and appetite control.
Until now, we had never had enough knowledge to modify this interaction to our benefit since 10,000 years ago, when the most significant change in the host-microbiota symbiosis occurred during the Neolithic revolution, a transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture and permanent settlement. In this period, agriculture and animal husbandry began to shape the genomes within us in an accelerated and non-stop fashion. The second giant leap in this relationship occurred during the industrialisation process and, most recently, during the Cocacolonization [95] and McDonalization [96] era, at least in the last five decades, driving dramatic changes in the human gut microbiota structure as we see in people with obesity, diabetes and other chronic diseases in the 20th and 21st century.
While we cannot entirely deny that the rationale for probiotics administration seems solid, it is also clear that we have a long way to go in understanding both the microbiota complexity and probiotics’ effects on many diseases, including obesity. Each of us has a unique gut microbiome, and thus, the effects of the different bacteria in commercial probiotics can be highly variable; therefore, we believe their use should be tailored within a framework of personalised medicine that takes into account the disease to be treated and the microbiota affected by that particular patient for optimal benefits. Thus, it is almost certain that current commercial products contain neither the correct strains nor the correct amounts of bacteria to provide benefits for most of the diseases to be treated. Therefore, while taking a supplement to improve health is undoubtedly an attractive prospect, there are no robust controlled clinical trials aimed at assessing the efficacy of probiotics as individual agents for treating obesity, as we have seen in dozens of anti-obesity drugs that have been developed over the decades. Until now, those patients seeking to improve chronic diseases such as obesity by helping their gut microbiota with probiotics pursue a mirage under a promise from the manufacturing companies that take advantage of not having to substantiate their claims with randomised controlled trials. Faced with this knowledge gap, it should consider consuming a healthy diet rich in soluble fibre from fruits and vegetables. In the meantime, rigorous clinical trials with very high-resolution genomic analysis are needed to corroborate the potential health benefits and confirm whether all the effects attributed to probiotics from the supplement industry are simply a myth or a new health revolution helping us stop the ominous obesity epidemic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation: X.E.L.A. and V.B.; Investigation: X.E.L.A. and V.B.; Writing—original draft: X.E.L.A., A.M., D.P. and V.B.; Writing—review and editing: X.E.L.A., A.M., D.P. and V.B.; Funding acquisition: V.B. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación-Colombia and La Universidad Simón Bolívar-Colombia Joint Grant for strengthening health science, technology, and innovation for ongoing projects with young talent and regional impact. Call # 874-2020; Grant number (Contrato): No. 462, 2021; Internal funds for research strengthening from Universidad Simon Bolivar, Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Extensión e Innovación, Barranquilla, Colombia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. CarrGómez, J.C.; Ena, J.; Lorido, J.A.; Ripoll, J.S.; Carrasco-Sánchez, F.J.; Gómez-Huelgas, R.; Soto, M.P.; Lista, J.D.; Martínez, P.P. Obesity Is a Chronic Disease. Positioning Statement of the Diabetes, Obesity and Nutrition Workgroup of the Spanish Society of internal Medicine (SEMI) for An Approach Centred on individuals with Obesity. Rev. Clín. Esp. 2021, 221, 509–516. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hales, C.M.; Carroll, M.D.; Fryar, C.D.; Ogden, C.L. Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2020, 360, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Safaei, M.; Sundararajan, E.A.; Driss, M.; Boulila, W.; Shapi’I, A. A Systematic Literature Review on Obesity: Understanding the Causes & Consequences of Obesity and Reviewing Various Machine Learning Approaches Used to Predict obesity. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 136, 104754. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, Z.; Deng, Q.; Li, Y. Obesogenic Environmental Factors of Adult Obesity in China: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Prakash, K.; Munyanyi, M.E. Energy Poverty and Obesity. Energy Econ. 2021, 101, 105428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pérez-Rodrigo, C.; Hervás Bárbara, G.; Gianzo Citores, M.; Aranceta-Bartrina, J. Prevalence of Obesity and Associated Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Spanish Population: The ENPE Study. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. Engl. 2021, 3, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Corazzini, R.; Morgado, F.; Gascón, T.M.; Affonso Fonseca, F.L. Evaluation of Obesity Associated with Health Risk Factors in Brazilian Public School. Obes. Med. 2020, 19, 100223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cornejo-Pareja, I.; Muñoz-Garach, A.; Clemente-Postigo, M.; Tinahones, F.J. Importance of Gut Microbiota in Obesity. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 72, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, H.; Tremaroli, V.; Schmidt, C.; Lundqvist, A.; Olsson, L.M.; Krämer, M. The Gut Microbiota in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Cell Metab. 2020, 32, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pittayanon, R.; Lau, J.T.; Yuan, Y.; Leontiadis, G.I.; Tse, F.; Surette, M. Gut Microbiota in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome—A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology 2019, 157, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nielsen, S.D.; Pearson, N.M.; Seidler, K. The Link between the Gut Microbiota and Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Mechanism Review with Focus on α-Synuclein Transport. Brain Res. 2021, 1769, 147609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lukacs, N.W.; Huang, Y.J. Microbiota–Immune interactions in Asthma Pathogenesis and Phenotype. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2020, 66, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, L.; Yang, K.; Zhou, P.; Yong, W. Gut Microbiota in Obesity and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver. Disease. Surg. Pract. Sci. 2021, 5, 100030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mills, S.; Stanton, C.; Lane, J.; Smith, G.; Ross, R. Precision Nutrition and the Microbiome, Part I: Current State of the Science. Nutrients 2019, 11, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gomaa, E.Z. Human Gut Microbiota/Microbiome in Health and Diseases: A Review. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2020, 113, 2019–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Crovesy, L.; Masterson, D.; Rosado, E.L. Profile of the Gut Microbiota of Adults with Obesity: A Systematic Review. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 74, 1251–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lilly, D.M.; Stillwell, R.H. Probiotics: Growth-Promoting Factors Produced by Microorganisms. Science 1965, 147, 747–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Afrc, R.F. Probiotics in Man and Animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1989, 66, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gilliland, S.E. Health and Nutritional Benefits from Lactic Acid Bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1990, 87, 175–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goldin, B.R.; Gorbach, S.L. The Effect of Milk and Lactobacillus Feeding on Human intestinal Bacterial Enzyme Activity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1984, 39, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Perdigón, G.; Fuller, R.; Raya, R. Lactic Acid Bacteria and their Effect-on the Immune System. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 2001, 2, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Vedamuthu, E.R. Starter Cultures for Yogurt and Fer-mented Milks. In RC Chandan Manufacturing Yogurt and Fermented Milks; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2006; pp. 88–115. [Google Scholar]
  23. Siciliano, R.A.; Mazzeo, M.F. Molecular Mechanisms of Probiotic Action: A Perspective. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Abdoli, M.; Mohammadi, G.; Mansouri, K.; Khaledian, S.; Taran, M.; Martinez, F. A Review on Anticancer, Antibacterial and Photo Catalytic Activity of Various Nanoparticles Synthesised by Probiotics. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 354, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tian, P.; Zou, R.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Qian, X.; Zhao, J. Multi-Probiotics Ameliorate Major Depressive Disorder and Accompanying Gastrointestinal Syndromes via Serotonergic System Regulation. J. Adv. Res. 2022, in press. [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, C.; Li, S.; Xue, P.; Yu, L.; Tian, F.; Zhao, J. The Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Lipid Profiles in Adults with Overweight or Obesity: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 86, 104711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Woźniak, D.; Cichy, W.; Przysławski, J.; Drzymała-Czyż, S. The Role of Microbiota and Enteroendocrine Cells in Maintaining Homeostasis in the Human Digestive Tract. Adv. Med. Sci. 2021, 66, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Specter, M. Germs are Us. New Yorker, 15 October 2012; Volume 88, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, J.; Jia, H.; Cai, X.; Zhong, H.; Feng, Q. An integrated Catalog of Reference Genes in the Human Gut Microbiome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arumugam, M.; Raes, J.; Pelletier, E.; Le Paslier, D.; Yamada, T. Enterotypes of the Human Gut Microbiome. Nature 2011, 473, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Watanabe, M.; Kojima, H.; Fukui, M. Complete Genome Sequence and Cell Structure of Limnochorda Pilosa, a Gram-Negative Spore-former within the Phylum Firmicutes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1330–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J. A Human Gut Microbial Gene Catalogue Established by Metagenomic Sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rinninella, E.; Raoul, P.; Cintoni, M.; Franceschi, F.; Miggiano, G.; Gasbarrini, A. What Is the Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition? A Changing Ecosystem Across Age, Environment, Diet, and Diseases. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Binda, C.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Rizzatti, G.; Gibiino, G.; Cennamo, V.; Gasbarrini, A. Actinobacteria: A Relevant Minority for the Maintenance of Gut Homeostasis. Dig. Liver. Dis. 2018, 50, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lapébie, P.; Lombard, V.; Drula, E.; Terrapon, N.; Henrissat, B. Bacteroidetes Use Thousands of Enzyme Combinations to Break Down Glycans. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ivanov, I.I.; de Llanos Frutos, R.; Manel, N.; Yoshinaga, K.; Rifkin, D.B.; Sartor, R.B.; Finlay, B.B.; Littman, D.R. Specific Microbiota Direct the Differentiation of Th17 Cells in the Mucosa of the Small intestine. Cell Host Microbe 2008, 4, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chassaing, B.; Koren, O.; Goodrich, J.K.; Poole, A.C.; Srinivasan, S.; Ley, R.E.; Gewirtz, A.T. Dietary Emulsifiers Impact the Mouse Gut Microbiota Promoting Colitis and Metabolic Syndrome. Nature 2015, 519, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gibiino, G.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Scaldaferri, F.; Rizzatti, G.; Binda, C.; Gasbarrini, A. Exploring Bacteroidetes: Metabolic Key Points and Immunological Tricks of Our Gut Commensals. Dig. Liver. Dis. 2018, 50, 635–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Quigley, E.M.M. Microbiota-Brain-Gut Axis and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2017, 17, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lukiw, W.J. Bacteroides Fragilis Lipopolysaccharide and inflammatory Signaling in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Stilling, R.M.; Van de Wouw, M.; Clarke, G.; Stanton, C.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. The Neuropharmacology of Butyrate: The Bread and Butter of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis? Neurochem. Int. 2016, 99, 110–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Morrison, D.J.; Preston, T. Formation of Short Chain Fatty Acids by the Gut Microbiota and their Impact on Human Metabolism. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Thorburn, A.N.; Macia, L.; Mackay, C.R. Diet, Metabolites, and “Western-Lifestyle” inflammatory Diseases. Immunity 2014, 40, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Macfarlane, G.T.; Macfarlane, S. Bacteria, Colonic Fermentation, and Gastrointestinal Health. J. AOAC Int. 2012, 95, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jung, T.-H.; Park, J.H.; Jeon, W.-M.; Han, K.-S. Butyrate Modulates Bacterial Adherence on LS174T Human Colorectal Cells by Stimulating Mucin Secretion and MAPK Signaling Pathway. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2015, 9, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Fukuda, S.; Toh, H.; Hase, K.; Oshima, K.; Nakanishi, Y.; Yoshimura, K.; Tobe, T.; Clarke, J.M.; Topping, D.L.; Suzuki, T.; et al. Bifidobacteria Can Protect from Enteropathogenic infection Through Production of Acetate. Nature 2011, 469, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wrzosek, L.; Miquel, S.; Noordine, M.-L.; Bouet, S.; Chevalier-Curt, M.J.; Robert, V.; Philippe, C.; Bridonneau, C.; Cherbuy, C.; Robbe-Masselot, C.; et al. Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Faecalibacterium Prausnitziiinfluence the Production of Mucus Glycans and the Development of Goblet Cells in the Colonic Epithelium of a Gnotobiotic Model Rodent. BMC Biol. 2013, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Miyauchi, S.; Gopal, E.; Fei, Y.J.; Ganapathy, V. Functional Identification of SLC5A8, A Tumor Suppressor Down-Regulated in Colon Cancer, as a Na+-coupled Transporter for Short-chain Fatty Acids. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 13293–13296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chassard, C.; Lacroix, C. Carbohydrates and the Human Gut Microbiota. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2013, 16, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ríos-Covián, D.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Margolles, A.; Gueimonde, M.; de los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Salazar, N. Intestinal Short Chain Fatty Acids and their Link with Diet and Human Health. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Parada Venegas, D.; De la Fuente, M.K.; Landskron, G.; González, M.J.; Quera, R.; Dijkstra, G.; Harmsen, H.J.; Faber, K.N.; Hermoso, M.A. Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)-Mediated Gut Epithelial and Immune Regulation and Its Relevance for inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Kim, C.H.; Park, J.; Kim, M. Gut Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids, T Cells, and inflammation. Immune Netw. 2014, 14, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Zhao, Y.; Chen, F.; Wu, W.; Sun, M.; Bilotta, A.J.; Yao, S.; Xiao, Y.; Huang, X.; Eaves-Pyles, T.D.; Golovko, G.; et al. GPR43 Mediates Microbiota Metabolite SCFA Regulation of Antimicrobial Peptide Expression in intestinal Epithelial Cells via Activation of mTOR and STAT3. Mucosal Immunol. 2018, 11, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Park, J.; Kim, M.; Kang, S.G.; Jannasch, A.H.; Cooper, B.; Patterson, J.; Kim, C.H. Short-Chain Fatty Acids induce Both Effector and Regulatory T Cells by Suppression of Histone Deacetylases and Regulation of the mTOR–S6K Pathway. Mucosal Immunol. 2015, 8, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Kim, K.N.; Yao, Y.; Ju, S.Y. Short Chain Fatty Acids and Fecal Microbiota Abundance in Humans with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Byrne, C.S.; Chambers, E.S.; Morrison, D.J.; Frost, G. The Role of Short Chain Fatty Acids in Appetite Regulation and Energy Homeostasis. Int. J. Obes. 2015, 39, 1331–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Larraufie, P. SCFas Strongly Stimulate PYY Production in Human Enteroendocrine Cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 74, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tolhurst, G.; Heffron, H.; Lam, Y.S.; Parker, H.E.; Habib, A.M.; Diakogiannaki, E.; Cameron, J.; Grosse, J.; Reimann, F.; Gribble, F.M. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Stimulate Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Secretion via the G-Protein–Coupled Receptor FFAR2. Diabetes 2012, 61, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Chambers, E.S.; Byrne, C.S.; Aspey, K.; Chen, Y.; Khan, S.; Morrison, D.J.; Frost, G. Acute Oral Sodium Propionate Supplementation Raises Resting Energy Expenditure and Lipid Oxidation in Fasted Humans. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chambers, E.S.; Viardot, A.; Psichas, A.; Morrison, D.J.; Murphy, K.G.; Zac-Varghese, S.E.K.; MacDougall, K.; Preston, T.; Tedford, C.; Finlayson, G.S.; et al. Effects of Targeted Delivery of Propionate to the Human Colon on Appetite Regulation, Body Weight Maintenance and Adiposity in Overweight Adults. Gut 2015, 64, 1744–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Byrne, C.; Chambers, E.S.; Alhabeeb, H.; Chhina, N.; Morrison, D.J.; Preston, T.; Tedford, C.; Fitzpatrick, J.; Irani, C.; Busza, A.; et al. Increased Colonic Propionate Reduces Anticipatory Reward Responses in the Human Striatum to High-Energy Foods. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Pluznick, J.L.; Protzko, R.J.; Gevorgyan, H.; Peterlin, Z.; Sipos, A.; Han, J.; Brunet, I.; Wan, L.X.; Rey, F.; Wang, T.; et al. Olfactory Receptor Responding to Gut Microbiota-Derived Signals Plays a Role in Renin Secretion and Blood Pressure Regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 4410–4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Natarajan, N.; Hori, D.; Flavahan, S.; Steppan, J.; Flavahan, N.A.; Berkowitz, D.E.; Pluznick, J.L. Microbial Short Chain Fatty Acid Metabolites Lower Blood Pressure via Endothelial G Protein-Coupled Receptor 41. Physiol. Genom. 2016, 48, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Benítez-Páez, A.; Del Pulgar, E.M.G.; Kjølbæk, L.; Brahe, L.K.; Astrup, A.; Larsen, L.; Sanz, Y. Impact of Dietary Fiber and Fat on Gut Microbiota Re-Modeling and Metabolic Health. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 57, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Broekaert, W.F.; Courtin, C.M.; Verbeke, K.; Van de Wiele, T.; Verstraete, W.; Delcour, J.A. Prebiotic and Other Health-Related Effects of Cereal-Derived Arabinoxylans, Arabinoxylan-Oligosaccharides, and Xylooligosaccharides. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 178–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. McCleary, B.V. Dietary Fiber Analysis. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Garrido, D.; Ruiz-Moyano, S.; Jimenez-Espinoza, R.; Eom, H.-J.; Block, D.E.; Mills, D.A. Utilization of Galactooligosaccharides by Bifidobacterium Longum Subsp. Infantis Isolates. Food Microbiol. 2013, 33, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Rivière, A.; Moens, F.; Selak, M.; Maes, D.; Weckx, S.; De Vuyst, L. The Ability of Bifidobacteria to Degrade Arabinoxylan Oligosaccharide Constituents and Derived Oligosaccharides Is Strain Dependent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 204–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Sanchez, J.I.; Marzorati, M.; Grootaert, C.; Baran, M.; Van Craeyveld, V.; Courtin, C.M.; Broekaert, W.F.; Delcour, J.A.; Verstraete, W.; Van de Wiele, T. Arabinoxylan-oligosaccharides (AXOS) Affect the Protein/Carbohydrate Fermentation Balance and Microbial Population Dynamics of the Simulator of Human intestinal Microbial Ecosystem: AXOS Effect on Protein/Carbohydrate Fermentation Balance. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Chassard, C.; Goumy, V.; Leclerc, M.; Del’homme, C.; Bernalier-Donadille, A. Characterization of the Xylan-degrading Microbial Community from Human Faeces: Xylanolytic Microbiota from Human Faeces. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 61, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Martinez-Guryn, K.; Hubert, N.; Frazier, K.; Urlass, S.; Musch, M.W.; Ojeda, P.; Pierre, J.; Miyoshi, J.; Sontag, T.J.; Cham, C.M.; et al. Small intestine Microbiota Regulate Host Digestive and Absorptive Adaptive Responses to Dietary Lipids. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 23, 458–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Maharshak, N.; Packey, C.D.; Ellermann, M.; Manick, S.; Siddle, J.P.; Huh, E.Y.; Plevy, S.; Sartor, R.B.; Carroll, I.M. Altered Enteric Microbiota Ecology in interleukin 10-Deficient Mice During Development and Progression of intestinal inflammation. Gut Microbes 2013, 4, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tseng, C.H.; Wu, C.Y. The Gut Microbiome in Obesity. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2019, 118, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gomes, A.C.; Hoffmann, C.; Mota, J.F. The Human Gut Microbiota: Metabolism and Perspective in Obesity. Gut Microbes 2018, 18, 308–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Jáquez, J.L.; Lascurain, L.; Falcon, A.C.; Montoya, J.R. Obesidad, Disbiosis Y Trastornos Gastrointestinales Funcionales En Edades Pediátricas. Neurogastrol. LATAM Rev. 2020, 4, 4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Petersen, C.; Round, J.L. Defining Dysbiosis and Its influence on Host Immunity and Disease. Cell Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Musso, G.; Gambino, R.; Cassader, M. Interactions between Gut Microbiota and Host Metabolism Predisposing to Obesity and Diabetes. Annu. Rev. Med. 2011, 62, 361–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Million, M.; Thuny, F.; Angelakis, E.; Casalta, J.-P.; Giorgi, R.; Habib, G.; Raoult, D. Lactobacillus Reuteri and Escherichia coli in the Human Gut Microbiota May Predict Weight Gain Associated with Vancomycin Treatment. Nutr. Diabetes 2013, 3, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wang, J.; Tang, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Derrien, M.; Rocher, E.; van-Hylckama Vlieg, J.E.; Strissel, K.; Zhao, L.; Obin, M.; et al. Modulation of Ggut Microbiota During Probiotic-Mediated Attenuation of Metabolic Syndrome in High Fat Diet-Fed Mice. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. de La Serre, C.B.; Ellis, C.L.; Lee, J.; Hartman, A.L.; Rutledge, J.C.; Raybould, H.E. Propensity to High-Fat Diet-induced Obesity in Rats Is Associated with Changes in the Gut Microbiota and Gut inflammation. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest. Liver. Physiol. 2010, 299, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Krautkramer, K.A.; Kreznar, J.H.; Romano, K.A.; Vivas, E.I.; Barrett-Wilt, G.A.; Rabaglia, M.E.; Keller, M.P.; Attie, A.D.; Rey, F.E.; Denu, J.M. Diet-Microbiota interactions Mediate Global Epigenetic Programming in Multiple Host Tissues. Mol. Cell 2016, 64, 982–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Farhadi, A.; Banan, A.; Fields, J.; Keshavarzian, A. Intestinal Barrier: An interface between Health and Disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2003, 18, 479–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rosenbaum, M.; Knight, R.; Leibel, R.L. The Gut Microbiota in Human Energy Homeostasis and Obesity. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 26, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Amabebe, E.; Robert, F.O.; Agbalalah, T.; Orubu, E.S.F. Microbial Dysbiosis-induced Obesity: Role of Gut Microbiota in Homoeostasis of Energy Metabolism. Br. J. Nutr. 2020, 123, 1127–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Do, M.; Lee, E.; Oh, M.J.; Kim, Y.; Park, H.Y. High-Glucose or -Fructose Diet Cause Changes of the Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Disorders in Mice without Body Weight Change. Nutrients 2018, 10, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Suzuki, T. Regulation of the intestinal Barrier by Nutrients: The Role of Tight Junctions. Anim. Sci. J. 2020, 91, 13357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. FAO/WHO Working Group. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food; FAO/WHO Working Group: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  88. Zendeboodi, F.; Khorshidian, N.; Mortazavian, A.M.; da Cruz, A.G. Probiotic: Conceptualisation from a New Approach. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Allen, A.P.; Hutch, W.; Borre, Y.E.; Kennedy, P.J.; Temko, A.; Boylan, G.; Murphy, E.; Cryan, J.F.; Dinan, T.G.; Clarke, G. Bifidobacterium Longum 1714 as a Translational Psychobiotic: Modulation of Sstress, Electrophysiology and Neurocognition in Healthy Volunteers. Transl. Psychiatry 2016, 6, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Lopez, M.; Li, N.; Kataria, J.; Russell, M.; Neu, J. Live and Ultraviolet-inactivated Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG Decrease Flagellin-induced interleukin-8 Production in Caco-2 Cells. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 2264–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Ajmal, S.; Ahmed, N. Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus Strains in Human infections. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2009, 3, 851–855. [Google Scholar]
  92. Wegh, C.A.; Geerlings, S.Y.; Knol, J.; Roeselers, G.; Belzer, C. Postbiotics and their Potential Applications in Early Life Nutrition and Beyond. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Sánchez, M.T.; Ruiz, M.A.; Morales, M.E. Microorganismos Probióticos Y Salud. Ars Pharm. 2015, 56, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Debédat, J.; Clément, K.; Aron-Wisnewsky, J. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Human Obesity: Impact of Bariatric Surgery. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2019, 8, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. da Silva Pontes, K.S.; Guedes, M.R.; da Cunha, M.R.; de Souza Mattos, S.; Silva, M.I.B.; Neves, M.F.; Marques, B.C.A.A.; Klein, M.R.S.T. Effects of Probiotics on Body Adiposity and Cardiovascular Risk Markers in individuals with Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 4915–4931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Koutnikova, H.; Genser, B.; Monteiro-Sepulveda, M.; Faurie, J.M.; Rizkalla, S.; Schrezenmeir, J.; Clément, K. Impact of Bacterial Probiotics on Obesity Diabetes and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Related Variables: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e017995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jpm 12 01282 g001 550
Figure 1. Gut microbiota composition: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria are the four “standard” Phyla in our gut intestinal microbiota. Each phylum comprises bacteria with diverse structures, metabolism, and functions.
Figure 1. Gut microbiota composition: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria are the four “standard” Phyla in our gut intestinal microbiota. Each phylum comprises bacteria with diverse structures, metabolism, and functions.
Jpm 12 01282 g001
Jpm 12 01282 g002 550
Figure 2. Main effects of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) on microbiota and epithelium barrier. SCFA protect the intestinal barrier by lowering the levels of TNFα and interleukin (IL)-6, activating the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) to participate in PParα expression increase and the intestinal-mediated inflammatory and immune response by suppressing histone deacetylase (HDAC) and downregulating the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, SCFA upregulates the gene expression of mucin family genes (MUC1–4) in the intestine, and the protons generated by SCFA dissociation produce an osmotic pressure imbalance in the bacteria. Furthermore, SCFA inhibits bacterial multiplication by interfering with DNA and protein synthesis.
Figure 2. Main effects of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) on microbiota and epithelium barrier. SCFA protect the intestinal barrier by lowering the levels of TNFα and interleukin (IL)-6, activating the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) to participate in PParα expression increase and the intestinal-mediated inflammatory and immune response by suppressing histone deacetylase (HDAC) and downregulating the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, SCFA upregulates the gene expression of mucin family genes (MUC1–4) in the intestine, and the protons generated by SCFA dissociation produce an osmotic pressure imbalance in the bacteria. Furthermore, SCFA inhibits bacterial multiplication by interfering with DNA and protein synthesis.
Jpm 12 01282 g002
Jpm 12 01282 g003 550
Figure 3. Dietary fibre and its effects on human metabolism and gut microbiota.
Figure 3. Dietary fibre and its effects on human metabolism and gut microbiota.
Jpm 12 01282 g003
Table
Table 1. The major species used as probiotics for the gastrointestinal tract in humans and their main locations and mechanisms of action [78].
Table 1. The major species used as probiotics for the gastrointestinal tract in humans and their main locations and mechanisms of action [78].
MicroorganismLocationMechanism of Action
Lactobacillus plantarumGastrointestinal tractAdhesion to epithelial cells
Improves IL-10 production in the colon
Lactobacillus rhamnosusGastrointestinal tract and brainAdhesion to epithelial cells, lactic acid production, Regeneration of epithelial cells, increases GABA receptors in cortical regions and decreases in the amygdala, hypothalamus, and Locus ceruleus
Lactobacillus salivariusGastrointestinal tractSecretion of low molecular weight bacteriocins.
Lactobacillus reuteriGastrointestinal tractReuterin (3-hydroxypropionaldehyde) production
Lactobacillus acidophilusIntestineCholesterol adherence
Lactobacillus caseiIntestineInhibits bacterial translocation, increases MUC gene expression, inhibits cholesterol mycelia formation, enhances NK cell activity, inhibits bacterial translocation, increases MUC gene expression, inhibits cholesterol mycelia formation, and enhances NK cell activity
Lactobacillus bulgaricusIntestineAdherence to cholesterol, inhibits the formation of cholesterol mycelia.
Bifidobacterium longumIntestineBinding to aflatoxin B1
Bifidobacterium adolescentisIntestineBinding to aflatoxin B1
Bifidobacterium animalisIntestineIncreases intestinal motility and bile salts hydrolysis.
Saccharomyces boullardiiIntestineT-cell redistribution
Lactobacillus plantarumIntestineDecreased translocation and adherence of pathogens
Lactobacillus paracaseiIntestineEnhances cancer cell apoptosis
Saccharomyces boulardiiIntestineImproves intestinal barrier function
Bifidobacterium sp.IntestineSecretes superoxide dismutase
Lactobacillus helveticusIntestineSecretes vitamin E
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

León Aguilera, X.E.; Manzano, A.; Pirela, D.; Bermúdez, V. Probiotics and Gut Microbiota in Obesity: Myths and Realities of a New Health Revolution. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081282

AMA Style

León Aguilera XE, Manzano A, Pirela D, Bermúdez V. Probiotics and Gut Microbiota in Obesity: Myths and Realities of a New Health Revolution. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(8):1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081282

Chicago/Turabian Style

León Aguilera, Xavier Eugenio, Alexander Manzano, Daniela Pirela, and Valmore Bermúdez. 2022. "Probiotics and Gut Microbiota in Obesity: Myths and Realities of a New Health Revolution" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 8: 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop