Next Article in Journal
Concomitant Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Management Strategies: A Narrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Contrasting EfficientNet, ViT, and gMLP for COVID-19 Detection in Ultrasound Imagery
Previous Article in Journal
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Altered Neuropsychological Functions in Patients with Subcortical Vascular Dementia
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Prediction of Vaccine Response and Development of a Personalized Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Strategy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results from a Large Single-Center Study

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(7), 1107; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071107
by Ilies Benotmane 1,2,*, Gabriela Gautier-Vargas 1, Noëlle Cognard 1, Jérôme Olagne 1,2, Françoise Heibel 1, Laura Braun-Parvez 1, Jonas Martzloff 1, Peggy Perrin 1,2, Romain Pszczolinski 1, Bruno Moulin 1,2, Samira Fafi-Kremer 2,3 and Sophie Caillard 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(7), 1107; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071107
Submission received: 5 May 2022 / Revised: 18 June 2022 / Accepted: 4 July 2022 / Published: 5 July 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

All in all acceptable 

Author Response

Response: Thank you for your valuable comments. 

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a very relevant subject and pertinent to clinical practice. I read this paper with great enthusiasm.  

Author Response

This is a very relevant subject and pertinent to clinical practice. I read this paper with great enthusiasm.  

Response: We greatly appreciate the reviewer’s positive feedback.

Reviewer 3 Report

This is a nice description of vaccination in transplant recipients.  The manuscript itself is well written.  The abstract contains a couple of errors, and the authors should go over it line by line to correct the minor mistakes.  This should be a nice contribution.

Author Response

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE TO COMMENT FROM Reviewer #3

This is a nice description of vaccination in transplant recipients.  The manuscript itself is well written. 

Response: We are very grateful for your supportive comments and valuable contribution.

 

The abstract contains a couple of errors, and the authors should go over it line by line to correct the minor mistakes.  This should be a nice contribution.

 

Response: Thank you for highlighting this. This has now been amended

Back to TopTop