Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Molecular Features Involved in Clinical Responses and Survival in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma Treated by Hormone Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Personalized Care and Treatment Compliance in Chronic Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Radiotherapy of Breast Cancer in Laterally Tilted Prone vs. Supine Position: What about the Internal Mammary Chain?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rehabilitation Nurse’s Perspective on Transitional Care: An Online Focus Group
 
 
Protocol
Peer-Review Record

Safety-Promoting Interventions for the Older Person with Hip Fracture on Returning Home: A Protocol for a Systematic Review

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(5), 654; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050654
by Paula Rocha 1,2,3,*, Cristina Lavareda Baixinho 3,4,5, Andréa Marques 6,7 and Adriana Henriques 3,5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(5), 654; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12050654
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 18 March 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 19 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Care and Treatment Compliance in Chronic Conditions)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

this paper need a major revision. As written in title 'a Protocol for a Systematic Review' i can not find the protocol. 

this paper need major revision because does not exist a correlation between title and content.

The Material and method are general informations without a protocol as suggested in the title. 

The authors are presenting some searching criterias without a correlation with the falling prevention or recovery after hip surgery.    

Author Response

We thank you for your review of our protocol proposal. We have reviewed it and introduced changes that are shaded in yellow.

Attached to this response is the PRISMA-P checklist with identification of each item in our text.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript presented the good topic and need to be deep design and study. After well explanations the study methodology and design but can not build the final conclusions through the solid results. We need more evidence to improve it can be worked. 

Author Response

We thank you for your review of our protocol proposal. We have reviewed it and introduced changes that are shaded in yellow.

Attached to this response is the PRISMA-P checklist with identification of each item in our text.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

You have solve the problems of this article and from my point of view it can be published.

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript was presented with good study methodology and design but still showed no innovation conclusions through the results from the system reviews. 

Back to TopTop