Next Article in Journal
Development of a Highly Sensitive Technique for Capturing Renal Cell Cancer Circulating Tumor Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Triple Test Plus Rapid Cognitive Screening Test: A Combination of Clinical Signs and A Tool for Cognitive Assessment in Older Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Procalcitonin Assays on KRYPTOR and LIAISON® XL Analyzers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Two Cognitive Screening Instruments in Different Dementia Subtypes and Clinical Depression

Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2019, 9(3), 95;
Received: 30 June 2019 / Revised: 9 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published: 14 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment)
Full completion of cognitive screening tests can be problematic in the context of a stroke. Our aim was to examine the completion of various brief cognitive screens and explore reasons for untestability. Data were collected from consecutive stroke admissions (May 2016–August 2018). The cognitive assessment was attempted during the first week of admission. Patients were classified as partially untestable (≥1 test item was incomplete) and fully untestable (where assessment was not attempted, and/or no questions answered). We assessed univariate and multivariate associations of test completion with: age (years), sex, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)), stroke classification, pre-morbid disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)), previous stroke and previous dementia diagnosis. Of 703 patients admitted (mean age: 69.4), 119 (17%) were classified as fully untestable and 58 (8%) were partially untestable. The 4A-test had 100% completion and the clock-draw task had the lowest completion (533/703, 76%). Independent associations with fully untestable status had a higher NIHSS score (odds ratio (OR): 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11–1.26), higher pre-morbid mRS (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02–1.60) and pre-stroke dementia (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.53–7.32). Overall, a quarter of patients were classified as untestable on the cognitive assessment, with test incompletion related to stroke and non-stroke factors. Clinicians and researchers would benefit from guidance on how to make the best use of incomplete test data. View Full-Text
Keywords: feasibility; cognitive screening instruments; cognition; stroke feasibility; cognitive screening instruments; cognition; stroke
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Elliott, E.; Drozdowska, B.A.; Taylor-Rowan, M.; Shaw, R.C.; Cuthbertson, G.; Quinn, T.J. Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? Diagnostics 2019, 9, 95.

AMA Style

Elliott E, Drozdowska BA, Taylor-Rowan M, Shaw RC, Cuthbertson G, Quinn TJ. Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting? Diagnostics. 2019; 9(3):95.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elliott, Emma, Bogna A. Drozdowska, Martin Taylor-Rowan, Robert C. Shaw, Gillian Cuthbertson, and Terence J. Quinn 2019. "Who Is Classified as Untestable on Brief Cognitive Screens in an Acute Stroke Setting?" Diagnostics 9, no. 3: 95.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop