Next Article in Journal
Hand-Held Ultrasound Devices Compared with High-End Ultrasound Systems: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Expressions of HLA Class II Genes in Cutaneous Melanoma Were Associated with Clinical Outcome: Bioinformatics Approaches and Systematic Analysis of Public Microarray and RNA-Seq Datasets
Review

Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT Using 18F-FDG Labeled White Blood Cells in Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review and a Bivariate Meta-Analysis

1
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, CH-6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
3
Clinic of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, CH-6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
4
Health Technology Assessment Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, CH-6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors share the last authorship.
Diagnostics 2019, 9(2), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9020060
Received: 29 May 2019 / Revised: 11 June 2019 / Accepted: 14 June 2019 / Published: 15 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging)
Background: Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography using white blood cells labeled with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG-WBC PET or PET/CT) in patients with suspicious infectious diseases has been evaluated in several studies; however, there is no consensus about the diagnostic accuracy of this method. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out on this topic. Methods: A comprehensive computer literature search screening PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library databases through March 2019 was performed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR−), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 18F-FDG-WBC PET or PET/CT in patients with infectious diseases were calculated. Results: Eight studies on the use of 18F-FDG-WBC PET or PET/CT in suspicious infectious diseases were discussed in the systematic review. The meta-analysis of seven studies (236 patients) provided these pooled results on a per patient-based analysis: sensitivity was 86.3% [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 75–92.9%], specificity 92% (95%CI 79.8–97.1%), LR+ 6.6 (95%CI: 3.1–14.1), LR− 0.2 (95%CI: 0.12–0.33), DOR 43.5 (95%CI: 12.2–155). A statistically significant heterogeneity was not detected. Conclusions: Despite limited literature data, 18F-FDG-WBC PET or PET/CT demonstrated a good diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of infectious diseases; nevertheless, larger studies are needed. View Full-Text
Keywords: PET; infection; 18F-FDG; leukocytes; white blood cells; meta-analysis PET; infection; 18F-FDG; leukocytes; white blood cells; meta-analysis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Meyer, M.; Testart, N.; Jreige, M.; Kamani, C.; Moshebah, M.; Muoio, B.; Nicod-Lalonde, M.; Schaefer, N.; Giovanella, L.; Prior, J.O.; Treglia, G. Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT Using 18F-FDG Labeled White Blood Cells in Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review and a Bivariate Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2019, 9, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9020060

AMA Style

Meyer M, Testart N, Jreige M, Kamani C, Moshebah M, Muoio B, Nicod-Lalonde M, Schaefer N, Giovanella L, Prior JO, Treglia G. Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT Using 18F-FDG Labeled White Blood Cells in Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review and a Bivariate Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics. 2019; 9(2):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9020060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meyer, Marie, Nathalie Testart, Mario Jreige, Christel Kamani, Mohammed Moshebah, Barbara Muoio, Marie Nicod-Lalonde, Niklaus Schaefer, Luca Giovanella, John O. Prior, and Giorgio Treglia. 2019. "Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT Using 18F-FDG Labeled White Blood Cells in Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review and a Bivariate Meta-Analysis" Diagnostics 9, no. 2: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9020060

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop