Next Article in Journal
Solid Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules of Less Than 300 mm3: Application of Different Volume Doubling Time Cut-offs in Clinical Practice
Next Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Obstruction
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT Using 18F-FDG Labeled White Blood Cells in Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review and a Bivariate Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Four Virtual-Reality Simulators for Diagnostic Abdominal Ultrasound Training in Radiology
Article Menu
Issue 2 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview

Hand-Held Ultrasound Devices Compared with High-End Ultrasound Systems: A Systematic Review

Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2019, 9(2), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9020061
Received: 23 April 2019 / Revised: 10 June 2019 / Accepted: 13 June 2019 / Published: 15 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ultrasound Imaging in Medicine 2019)
  |  
PDF [440 KB, uploaded 25 June 2019]
  |  

Abstract

The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature available on the comparison of hand-held ultrasound devices with high-end systems for abdominal and pleural applications. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Original research describing hand-held ultrasound devices compared with high-end systems was included and assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2. The search was limited to articles published since 1 January 2012. A total of 2486 articles were found and screened by title and abstract. A total of 16 articles were chosen for final review. All of the included articles showed good overall agreement between hand-held and high-end ultrasound systems. Strong correlations were found when evaluating ascites, hydronephrosis, pleural cavities, in detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms and for use with obstetric and gynaecological patients. Other articles found good agreement for cholelithiasis and for determining the best site for paracentesis. QUADAS-2 analysis suggested few risks of bias and almost no concerns regarding applicability. For distinct clinical questions, hand-held devices may be a valuable supplement to physical examination. However, evidence is inadequate, and more research is needed on the abdominal and pleural use of hand-held ultrasound with more standardised comparisons, using only blinded reviewers. View Full-Text
Keywords: pocket devices; portable; hand-held; ultrasound; comparison; pleura; abdomen pocket devices; portable; hand-held; ultrasound; comparison; pleura; abdomen
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary materials

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Rykkje, A.; Carlsen, J.F.; Nielsen, M.B. Hand-Held Ultrasound Devices Compared with High-End Ultrasound Systems: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics 2019, 9, 61.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Diagnostics EISSN 2075-4418 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top