Next Article in Journal
The Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder Prediction Based on AI-Assisted EEG Dynamic Features in Anesthetized Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapidly Progressive Medial Calcific Sclerosis in a Dialysis Patient
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications of Ultra-Low-Profile INCRAFT and Ovation Endografts: Long-Term Follow-Up in a Single-Center Experience
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intramyocardial Left Anterior Descending Artery Extending Toward the Right Ventricle Demonstrated on Coronary CT Angiography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

A Subtle Sister Mary Joseph Nodule in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

by
Mohammed Abdulrasak
1,2
1
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 203 13 Malmo, Sweden
2
Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02 Malmo, Sweden
Diagnostics 2026, 16(8), 1190; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16081190
Submission received: 20 March 2026 / Revised: 11 April 2026 / Accepted: 13 April 2026 / Published: 16 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Collection Interesting Images)

Abstract

A 47-year-old woman with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, diagnosed five months earlier and treated with palliative chemotherapy, was admitted with fever, jaundice, and right upper quadrant pain consistent with ascending cholangitis. Treatment with antibiotics was initiated and an endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed, whereby a biliary stent was placed to relieve malignant biliary obstruction. Physical examination revealed moderate ascites. Careful inspection of the umbilicus revealed a small nodular lesion located within the umbilical fold that became visible only after eversion of the umbilicus. The lesion had developed gradually over several weeks. Computed tomography confirmed the known pancreatic malignancy with metastatic disease and ascites. On re-review of the images, a small soft tissue nodule replacing the umbilicus was also visible. The lesion was clinically consistent with a Sister Mary Joseph nodule, an umbilical metastasis most commonly associated with advanced gastrointestinal or gynecologic malignancies. These lesions may arise through lymphatic or hematogenous spread or through direct extension into the umbilicus. This case highlights that umbilical metastases may be subtle and located within the umbilical fold, requiring careful physical examination to be detected.

Figure 1. Clinical and radiological findings. (A) Umbilicus everted by the patient’s fingers demonstrating a small nodular lesion within the umbilical fold. (B) Axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing metastatic pancreatic cancer with ascites. On re-review, a subtle soft tissue nodule (arrow) replacing the umbilicus can be identified. Sister Mary Joseph nodules represent cutaneous metastases to the umbilicus and are most commonly associated with advanced intra-abdominal malignancies, particularly of gastrointestinal or gynecologic origin [1]. Classically, these lesions present as firm, irregular, and often prominent umbilical masses that may distort or replace the normal umbilical contour [2]. In contrast, the lesion in the present case was small, located within the umbilical fold, and did not result in gross deformation of the umbilicus. Although a variety of benign conditions (such as dermatofibromas or keloid scars) may present with similar appearances, interpretation within the appropriate clinical context is essential [3]. The differential diagnoses for umbilical lesions are broad and may include umbilical hernia, omphalitis, and endometriosis alongside metastatic lesions [4]. In patients presenting with red-flag features such as unexplained weight loss, jaundice, or abdominal pain, the presence of an umbilical lesion should prompt consideration of underlying intra-abdominal malignancy [5]. Even subtle findings may therefore warrant further evaluation. Such presentations may be easily overlooked without careful physical examination, including eversion of the umbilicus. The novelty of this case lies not in the diagnosis itself, but in the subtle “intrafold” presentation, which required eversion of the umbilicus and re-review of imaging for detection. Although management was unchanged in this case, the finding supports the importance of careful physical examination as part of the clinician’s diagnostic armamentarium.
Figure 1. Clinical and radiological findings. (A) Umbilicus everted by the patient’s fingers demonstrating a small nodular lesion within the umbilical fold. (B) Axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image showing metastatic pancreatic cancer with ascites. On re-review, a subtle soft tissue nodule (arrow) replacing the umbilicus can be identified. Sister Mary Joseph nodules represent cutaneous metastases to the umbilicus and are most commonly associated with advanced intra-abdominal malignancies, particularly of gastrointestinal or gynecologic origin [1]. Classically, these lesions present as firm, irregular, and often prominent umbilical masses that may distort or replace the normal umbilical contour [2]. In contrast, the lesion in the present case was small, located within the umbilical fold, and did not result in gross deformation of the umbilicus. Although a variety of benign conditions (such as dermatofibromas or keloid scars) may present with similar appearances, interpretation within the appropriate clinical context is essential [3]. The differential diagnoses for umbilical lesions are broad and may include umbilical hernia, omphalitis, and endometriosis alongside metastatic lesions [4]. In patients presenting with red-flag features such as unexplained weight loss, jaundice, or abdominal pain, the presence of an umbilical lesion should prompt consideration of underlying intra-abdominal malignancy [5]. Even subtle findings may therefore warrant further evaluation. Such presentations may be easily overlooked without careful physical examination, including eversion of the umbilicus. The novelty of this case lies not in the diagnosis itself, but in the subtle “intrafold” presentation, which required eversion of the umbilicus and re-review of imaging for detection. Although management was unchanged in this case, the finding supports the importance of careful physical examination as part of the clinician’s diagnostic armamentarium.
Diagnostics 16 01190 g001

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because it describes a case of a patient undergoing routine clinical care with the explicit consent of the patient (see below). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Further information regarding the case is available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abu-Hilal, M.; Newman, J.S. Sister Mary Joseph and Her Nodule: Historical and Clinical Perspective. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2009, 337, 271–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fairchild, A.; Janoski, M.; Dundas, G. Sister Mary Joseph’s Nodule. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2007, 176, 929–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ha, D.-L.; Yang, M.-Y.; Shin, J.-O.; Kim, H.-S.; Ko, H.-C.; Kim, B.-S.; Kim, M.-B. Benign Umbilical Tumors Resembling Sister Mary Joseph Nodule. Clin. Med. Insights Oncol. 2021, 15, 1179554921995022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yan, L.; Sethi, S.; Bitterman, P.; Reddy, V.; Gattuso, P. Umbilical Lesions: Clinicopathologic Features of 99 Tumors. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018, 26, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Calongos, G.; Ogino, M.; Kinuta, T.; Hori, M.; Mori, T. Sister Mary Joseph Nodule as a First Manifestation of a Metastatic Ovarian Cancer. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 2016, 1087513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdulrasak, M. A Subtle Sister Mary Joseph Nodule in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Diagnostics 2026, 16, 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16081190

AMA Style

Abdulrasak M. A Subtle Sister Mary Joseph Nodule in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Diagnostics. 2026; 16(8):1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16081190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdulrasak, Mohammed. 2026. "A Subtle Sister Mary Joseph Nodule in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer" Diagnostics 16, no. 8: 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16081190

APA Style

Abdulrasak, M. (2026). A Subtle Sister Mary Joseph Nodule in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Diagnostics, 16(8), 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16081190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop