Next Article in Journal
Intelligent Neurovascular Imaging Engine (INIE): Topology-Aware Compressed Sensing and Multimodal Super-Resolution for Real-Time Guidance in Clinically Relevant Porcine Stroke Recanalization
Next Article in Special Issue
Acute Airway Crisis in Mucopolysaccharidosis VI: Management Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Second-Trimester Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio and Platelet Activation Markers Compared with the HALP Score for Predicting Preeclampsia
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Clinically Translatable Multimodal Deep Learning Model for HRD Detection from Histopathology Images
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression Analysis of miRNA Profiles in Colorectal Cancer with a Bioinformatics Approach: An Emphasis on miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p

1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Art and Science, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep 27310, Turkey
2
Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep 27310, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2026, 16(4), 614; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040614
Submission received: 16 December 2025 / Revised: 15 January 2026 / Accepted: 16 January 2026 / Published: 19 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Pathology 2026)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to determine the potential roles of miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, miR-6831-5p, and miR-7161-5p in colorectal cancer by evaluating their expression levels in matched tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues from 86 patients. Methods: A total of 172 samples were analyzed, and the associations between miRNA expression levels and clinicopathological characteristics were assessed, along with correlations among the miRNAs. Functional enrichment analyses, including GO and KEGG pathway evaluations, were performed using DIANA-mirPath v.3 to characterize biological processes and signaling pathways associated with the predicted target genes. Results: The results showed that miR-4295 and miR-4720-5p were significantly upregulated in tumor tissues, while miR-4773 and miR-6831-5p were significantly downregulated (p < 0.001). No significant difference in miR-7161-5p expression was observed between tumor and non-tumor tissues (p = 0.877). KEGG analysis indicated that miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p regulate genes involved in the TGF-β, mTOR, ErbB, FoxO, and endocytosis signaling pathways. Conclusions: These findings suggest that miR-4295 and miR-4720-5p may have oncogenic functions, while miR-4773 and miR-6831-5p may have tumor-suppressing functions, and that this relationship may contribute to the development of colorectal cancer.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a major malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract and ranks among the leading cancer types in terms of global incidence in both men and women. It represents the third leading cause of cancer-associated death in males and the fourth leading cause in females [1]. Globally, approximately two million new cases of CRC are diagnosed annually, while almost a million people die from this disease [2,3]. CRC shows diversity among individuals in the mechanism of formation as well as at the cellular and molecular level [4]. A number of risk factors are known to contribute to the development of colorectal tumors, including older age, family history, Western-style diet, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, diabetes, obesity, and ulcerative colitis. However, the most serious risk factor is age; adolescents and elders are particularly more susceptible [5,6]. CRC is a complex and heterogeneous disease with multiple genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications. The initiation of CRC is driven by a series of interconnected genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, marked by aberrant oncogene signaling and suppression of tumor suppressor pathways within the colonic epithelium. Such alterations facilitate the transition from colorectal adenomas to malignant adenocarcinoma [7]. Epigenetic regulation is essential for maintaining normal cellular functions, and disruptions in these processes can contribute to cellular dysregulation and the development of various malignancies, including CRC [8,9,10,11]. Therefore, microRNAs (miRNAs), playing an important role in physiological and pathological processes, can cause critical changes in target genes as regulators of nearly one third of human genes [12].
miRNAs are non-coding endogenous negative regulators of gene expression, consisting of approximately 20–24 nucleotides and representing a class of evolutionarily significantly conserved molecules. The regulatory effects of these small molecules can be explained by their ability to bind with complementary mRNAs via base-pairing interactions. Two mechanisms are responsible for the functionality of these molecules. The first mechanism involves the process of mRNA degradation, while the second one operates through the inhibition of mRNA translation. miRNAs serve as key regulators of numerous biological processes, contributing to the maintenance of cellular homeostasis through their involvement in cell growth, development, metabolic regulation, programmed cell death, immune responses, intercellular signaling, and differentiation [13]. The results of numerous studies have highlighted the detection of different levels of miRNAs in various cancers, including CRC. These molecules have been implicated as oncogenes or tumor suppressors in the process of carcinogenesis through several mechanisms [14,15,16]. More than 50% of miRNA genes are located on the cancer-associated genome and regulate many important signaling pathways related to CRC pathogenesis [17]. miRNAs affect the expression of several genes involved in key pathways, such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), mechanistic (mammalian) target of rapamycin (mTOR), ErbB receptor (ErbB), Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT), vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF/VEGFR), epidermal growth factor receptor/mitogen-activated protein kinase (EGFR/MAPK), and hippo signaling pathway with yes-associated protein (Hippo-YAP), that contribute to CRC formation [18,19,20]. In numerous experimental studies, miRNAs appear to have a significant role in cancer formation, prognosis, and progression. Therefore, they attract attention as agents that can be used as therapeutic targets [21,22].
Many studies have reported significant differences in miRNA expression levels between normal and tumor tissues in various cancer types [23,24]. In a study investigating the link between CRC and miRNAs, Gurer et al. (2022) reported a significant downregulation of miR-485-3p and miR-4728-5p in tumor tissues [25]. In a recent study, downregulation of miR-143, miR-145, miR-574-3p, and miR-133b, considered to have a potential tumor suppressor role in CRC, was observed, and these miRNAs were defined as valuable biomarkers for diagnostics and prediction [26]. In another study, Susanti et al. reported an increased expression of miR-135a/b-5p and miR-494-3p, involved in adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene silencing, which might have potential use in early diagnosis of CRC as well as transcriptomic anti-mir-based therapy [27]. In a further study, the upregulation of miR-135b and miR-182 in CRC tissue lines was shown to promote proliferation via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (AKT) (PI3K/AKT) pathway [28]. There are numerous studies showing dysregulation of different miRNAs in various types of cancers. miR-4295 expression was examined in osteosarcoma [29], glioma [30], thyroid [31], gastric [32], kidney [33], and pancreatic cancers [34]; miR-4720-5p in hepatocellular carcinoma [35] and intramucosal gastric cancers [36]; miR-4773 in gastrointestinal stromal tumor [37] and breast cancer [38]; miR-6831-5p in bladder [39], pancreatic [40,41], breast [42], prostate [43], and gastric cancers [36].
The selection of miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, miR-6831-5p, and miR-7161-5p in this study is based on the previous reports indicating their dysregulation in various malignancies, and the lack of studies investigating comprehensive expression data in CRC. Although these miRNAs play a role in different cancer-related signaling pathways, their potential roles in CRC have largely been uninvestigated. Therefore, this research aimed to explore the expression profiles of these miRNAs in CRC tissues and to elucidate their possible roles in colorectal carcinogenesis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Tissue Samples

The present study’s sampling comprised 86 patients diagnosed with CRC who underwent the relevant surgical operations between 2018 and 2022. Prospectively matched tumor and non-tumor healthy tissues were collected from each patient, making a total of 172 samples. The adjacent non-tumor healthy tissues were collected from samples taken at a sufficient distance from the tumor margin during the same surgical resection procedure and represented histologically normal colon and rectal tissues. Importantly, no additional invasive procedures were performed to obtain control samples, and all tissue collection procedures were performed within the scope of standard surgical treatment. All surgical operations and tissue sample collections were carried out at Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery. The patients to be included in the study were chosen according to the fact that they were diagnosed with colon and/or rectum adenocarcinoma as a result of histopathological diagnosis and did not receive any previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment. Furthermore, patients were excluded from our research according to the following criteria: those diagnosed with other types of cancer, autoimmune or inflammatory diseases and cardiovascular disease within the previous six months, active infection within the body, long-term bedridden patients, and patients unable to tolerate surgery. Within the present study, written and signed informed consent was obtained from all patients. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of Gaziantep University (approval no. 2021/148, approved date: 14 July 2021). All procedures were conducted in compliance with the ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. All tissue samples collected for the analysis were stored in a solution of RNAlater (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) at a temperature of −80 °C.

2.2. RNA Isolation, Quantitation, and Evaluation

The total RNA was extracted using the mirVanaTM miRNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, AM1560) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantification (concentration and purity) of the isolated RNA was determined using a NanoDrop spectrometer (Maestrogen, Hsinchu, Taiwan). The RNA concentration of each sample was calculated by the ratios A260/A280 and A260/A230. Samples with an OD A260/A280 ratio between 1.8 and 2.1 were considered as highly pure RNA. Following isolation, RNA samples were preserved at −80 °C until further analysis.

2.3. cDNA Synthesis

Total extracted RNA was converted to cDNA using a TaqManTM Advanced miRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, A28007). cDNAs were stored at −20 °C under appropriate conditions for use in Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR).

2.4. Amplification of miRNAs by RT-qPCR

Quantitative Real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, 4444557), and TaqMan® MicroRNA Analyzers (Applied Biosystems, USA). miRNA-specific primers were used to calculate the relative expression levels of miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, miR-6831-5p, and miR-7161-5p according to the 2−∆∆Ct method [44]. RNU6 was selected as a housekeeping gene as previously reported in CRC miRNA studies [16]. Samples were run in three replicates to determine the mean cycle threshold (Ct) value for the amplification of each sample. The sequences of the primers used for each miRNA are listed in Table 1.

2.5. Functional Enrichment Analysis of miRNAs

DIANA-mirPath is an online tool for analyzing miRNA pathways that can support complex processes and provide precise statistics. MirPath uses experimentally validated interactions between miRNAs obtained from DIANA-TarBase or predicted targets of miRNAs (in CDS or 3′-UTR regions) provided by the DIANA-microT-CDS algorithm. It then uses advanced assembly and meta-analysis procedures to identify these interactions (predicted and/or validated). To further elucidate the biological functions of target genes affected by dysregulated miRNAs, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis is performed using the DIANA-miRPath v3.0 online tool [45]. KEGG analysis is performed to predict the metabolic pathways of target genes of dysregulated miRNAs in tissue from CRC patients. A Venn diagram is generated by overlaying the target genes of miRNAs using the Venny 2.1.0 web application [46].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data processing was carried out using SPSS Software, version 22.0, developed by IBM Corp. All data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. RT-qPCR data analysis was conducted using the 2−ΔΔCt method [46]. Initially, the Ct values for each sample were determined. Subsequently, utilizing the ΔCt (ΔCt = Ct target − Ct RNU6) values from tumor and non-tumor tissues, the ΔΔCt (ΔΔCt = ΔCt tumor − ΔCt non-tumor) values were calculated. Finally, the fold-change values were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The statistical analysis was conducted using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Given the normality of the data distribution, the ΔCt values of the following miRNAs (miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, miR-6831-5p, and miR-7161-5p) were compared in the tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues using the paired t-test. Furthermore, the relationship between the expression levels of these miRNAs and the clinicopathological features of the patients was determined by performing Pearson chi-square (χ2) and Fisher’s exact tests. For these analyses, miRNA expression levels were grouped as high or low based on fold change values (>1 or <1), a commonly used approach in relative expression studies that utilizes the 2−ΔΔCt method to distinguish between upregulated and downregulated expression patterns, as previously described in the literature [16]. This categorization was applied to facilitate exploratory subgroup analyses. Given the exploratory and hypothesis-generating nature of this study, no formal adjustment for multiple testing was applied. While multiple clinicopathological comparisons were performed, the primary aim was to identify potential associations for further investigation. Therefore, associations with p-values between 0.01 and 0.05 should be interpreted cautiously and warrant validation in independent cohorts. Since the fold change values representing the expression levels of miRNAs did not show a normal distribution, the correlation between these values was examined using the Spearman correlation test. The values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

The mean age of 86 CRC patients who participated in the present study was 58.425 years, with a standard deviation of ±14.79 years and a range from 30 to 79 years. Of the participants, 32 (37.2%) were female and 54 (62.8%) were male. Sixty-one tissue samples (70.9%) were obtained from the colon and 25 tissue samples (29.1%) were from the rectum. The tumor size was determined to be larger than 6 cm in 32 patients, which constitutes 37.2% of the study population. According to histopathologic tumor type, 69 (80.2%) cases were confirmed as adenocarcinoma and 17 (19.8%) as mucinous adenocarcinoma. While 14 (16.3%) patients had distant organ metastasis, 39 (45.3%) patients had lymph node metastasis (N1 + N2). In addition, neural invasion was observed in 17 (19.8%) patients and lymphovascular invasion in 24 (27.9%) patients. It was observed that 44 cases (51.2%) were classified as advanced stage disease (stage III–IV). The demographic and clinicopathological profiles of patients with CRC included in the study are summarized in Table 2.

3.2. miRNA Expression Levels

In our study, the expression levels of miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, miR-6831-5p, and miR-7161-5p were determined in a total of 172 tissue samples, including tumor and adjacent healthy tissues from 86 CRC patients. We found out that the expression levels of miR-4295 and miR-4720-5p were significantly increased in tumors compared to normal tissues (both p-values < 0.001) (fold-change values: 2.33 ± 1.86 and 2.44 ± 2.39, respectively) (Figure 1A,B). We also observed that the expression levels of miR-4773 and miR-6831-5p were significantly decreased in tumors compared to normal tissues (both p values < 0.001) (fold-change values: 0.75 ± 0.59 and 0.67 ± 0.39, respectively) (Figure 1C,D). Despite the increased expression levels of miR-7161-5p in pathological tissues compared to normal tissues, no significant difference was detected (p = 0.877) (fold-change value: 1.14 ± 0.66) (Figure 1E).

3.3. The Association of miRNA Expression with Clinical and Pathological Features in Patients with CRC

The relationship between the clinical and pathological characteristics of CRC patients and the expression levels of miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, miR-6831-5p, and miR-7161-5p was evaluated using Pearson’s Chi-squared (χ2) and Fisher’s exact tests, and the results of the analysis are shown in Table 3. As a result of these analyses, no significant correlation was found between the expression levels of miR-4295 and the clinical and pathological outcome of the patients. However, a significant correlation was found between the high expression of miR-4720-5p and the criteria of age (>55), tumor location (colon), and histological type (adenocarcinoma) (p values: 0.031, 0.049, and 0.018, respectively). However, there was a statistically significant lower expression of miR-4773 in patients with histological subtype adenocarcinoma compared to mucinous adenocarcinoma type (p = 0.025). In addition, a significant difference was observed between low expression of miR-6831-5p and tumor histological type of adenocarcinoma and tumor diameter of 6 cm or less (p values: 0.018 and 0.014, respectively). In accordance with the T1 + T2 categorization (T1: tumor has invaded the submucosa, T2: tumor has invaded the muscularis propria), the T3 + T4 categorization (T3: the tumor invades the peri-colorectal fatty tissue through the muscularis-propria, T4: tumor adhered to or invaded visceral peritoneum or adjacent organs or structures), and those with lymph node metastasis in the N0 (no regional lymph node metastasis) group showed statistical significance with high expression of miR-7161-5p compared to the N1 + N2 (N1: 1–3 pericolic lymph involvement, N2: 2–4 pericolic lymph involvement or perirectal involvement) group (p values; 0.025 and 0.018, respectively) (Table 3).

3.4. Correlation Between microRNAs Expression Levels

The results of the Spearman correlation test indicated a statistically significant positive correlation between the expression levels of miR-4295 and miR-4720-5p, and miR-4773 and miR-6831-5p (p < 0.001, r = 0.408; p < 0.001, r = 0.649, respectively), while a negative correlation was detected between miR-4720-5p and miR-6831-5p (p < 0.001, r = 0.245) (Table 4).

3.5. Gene Ontology (GO) Annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway Enrichment Analysis of miRNAs

To facilitate a comprehensive assessment of the biological pathways related to the candidate target genes of miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p, GO functional annotation and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed. The selection process involved the designation of three GO functional annotations: biological pathway (BP), cellular component, and molecular function (MF). GO analysis results presented that in terms of biological process, dysregulated miRNAs (miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p) were primarily enriched in the cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process, biosynthetic process, cellular protein modification process, gene expression, cell–cell signaling, epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway, fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling pathway, etc. The cellular component was found to be enriched in organelles, protein complexes, the cytosol, and the nucleoplasm. The molecular functions that were primarily enriched were binding, protein binding, transcription factor activity, nucleic acid binding, transcription factor activity, enzyme binding, and enzyme regulator activity. As shown in Table 5, it was detected that 1201, 2068, and 1269 genes were linked to biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions, respectively.
In order to investigate the functional mechanism of the dysregulated miRNAs, a KEGG pathway analysis was conducted using the DIANA-mirPath v.3 online tool. The results of this analysis indicated that the dysregulated miRNAs were significantly enriched in pathways involving endocytosis, the forkhead box O (FoxO) signaling pathway, signaling pathways regulating the pluripotency of stem cells, the ErbB signaling pathway, the TGF-beta signaling pathway, the mTOR signaling pathway, and so on. Table 6 summarizes the KEGG pathways that showed significant enrichment for the dysregulated miRNAs, together with the corresponding target genes linked to each pathway. A total of four dysregulated miRNAs were found to target six KEGG pathways, and it was observed that these target genes exhibited significant overlap between signaling pathways. The target genes of the four dysregulated miRNAs shown in Table 6 in four top-regulated pathways associated with CRC (endocytosis, FoxO signaling pathway, signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells, ErbB signaling pathway) were confirmed by Venn diagram. Bioinformatic analyses revealed that the common target genes of the three pathways (endocytosis, the FoxO signaling pathway, and the signaling pathways regulating the pluripotency of stem cells) are SMAD2 and IGF1R (Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S1). To identify common regulatory mechanisms, signaling pathways involving the predicted targets of dysregulated miRNAs were examined, and Venn diagram analysis was used to display intersecting genes. In the signaling pathways given in Table 6, 37 target genes of miR-4295, 7 target genes of miR-4720-5p, 21 target genes of miR-4773, and 16 target genes of miR-6831-5p were detected. As demonstrated in Figure 3 and outlined in Supplementary Table S2, there was an overlap of four target genes (CBLB, EPS15, SOD2, ABL2) of “miR-4773” and “miR-4295”, one target gene (WNT2B) of “miR-4295” and “miR-6831-5p”, one target gene (SMARCAD1) of “miR-4720-5p” and “miR-6831-5p”, and two target genes (TGFBR1, ACVR1C) of “miR-4773” and “miR-6831-5p”.

4. Discussion

Colorectal carcinogenesis develops through the gradual accumulation of diverse genetic abnormalities accompanied by widespread epigenetic dysregulation in the otherwise normal colonic epithelium. As these alterations intensify over time, they facilitate the progression from initial mucosal changes to adenomatous formations and, ultimately, to invasive adenocarcinoma. While genomic mutations constitute a fundamental component in the initiation of this process, epigenetic modifications exert a substantial impact by shaping tumor behavior, influencing disease evolution, and contributing to malignant transformation [8,47]. Collectively, these features highlight colorectal cancer as a major public health issue, with mortality rates reaching approximately 9% in males and 8% in females [1]. Despite considerable advances in screening and therapeutic strategies, the long-term survival of patients with CRC remains unsatisfactory. The overall 5-year survival rate rarely exceeds 40%, and outcomes are substantially poorer in those diagnosed with metastatic disease, where 5-year survival drops to nearly 14%. In contrast, when CRC is detected at an early and localized stage, timely intervention can result in cure rates approaching 90%, underscoring the critical importance of effective early detection and intervention strategies [48,49]. Therefore, the identification and clinical implementation of novel molecular biomarkers are critically important for colorectal cancer, particularly given the inherent limitations of current screening and diagnostic modalities [50,51]. Accordingly, elucidating the key regulatory factors that drive CRC development and understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying disease progression are of paramount importance. Both genetic instability and epigenetic dysregulation contribute not only to the heterogeneous genotypic landscape of CRC but also act as fundamental drivers of tumor initiation and evolution. miRNAs, small non-coding RNAs expressed in a tissue- and time-specific manner, have emerged as critical post-transcriptional regulators in numerous pathophysiological processes. Recent evidence demonstrates that miRNAs participate in multiple stages of carcinogenesis, functioning either as tumor suppressors or as oncogenes depending on their biological context. Moreover, significant alterations in miRNA expression profiles have been widely reported across various malignancies and even in several non-cancerous diseases, highlighting their diagnostic and mechanistic relevance [52,53,54]. miRNAs are frequently located within fragile genomic regions and are highly vulnerable to genetic alterations, including point mutations, deletions, amplifications, and chromosomal translocations, all of which can disrupt their expression and contribute to tumorigenesis [55,56]. Numerous high-quality studies across diverse cancer types, including CRC, consistently demonstrate that miRNAs exhibit markedly altered expression patterns when comparing neoplastic tissues with their non-tumorous counterparts [57,58,59,60].
The present study was designed to investigate whether miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, miR-6831-5p, and miR-7161-5p contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis by analyzing their differential expression profiles in tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues. miR-4295, which is located within the intronic region of the VTI1A gene on chromosome 10q25.2, is broadly expressed in vivo and represents a functionally versatile miRNA with diverse roles in cellular and molecular processes [61]. The current analysis demonstrated a significant elevation in miR-4295 expression in tumor tissues compared with adjacent non-tumorous tissues (p < 0.001). Several studies have also demonstrated that miR-4295 is upregulated in multiple cancer types and influences various tumor phenotypes. Consistent with our findings, elevated miR-4295 expression levels in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues have been reported in osteosarcoma [29] and glioma [30]. Yan et al. observed overexpression of miR-4295, which induces silencing of the LRIG1 gene and overactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway in gastric cancer, and therefore suggested it to have an oncogenic role [62]. Although Yang et al. reported a significant association between elevated miR-4295 expression and both tumor size and distant metastasis in gastric cancer tissues and cell lines, the present study did not demonstrate any significant correlation between miR-4295 overexpression in colorectal tumor tissues and the clinicopathological features of CRC patients. In the same study, the authors also showed that miR-4295 can directly bind to the 3′UTR of PTEN, markedly reducing its expression in vitro and thereby promoting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in gastric cancer [32]. In another study, miR-4295 was shown to target BTG1 in bladder cancer and suggested to be an oncogenic potential biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer [33]. Liang et al. reported that the anti-tumor PTPN14 gene was a potential target gene of miR-4295 in osteosarcoma and was negatively modulated by high miR-4295 levels [63]. Another study exhibited that miR-4295 expression was significantly increased in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tissues and cell lines compared to healthy tissues, promoting cell growth and metastasis, and was also associated with reduced patient survival [64]. On the other hand, a study of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) showed that miR-4295 expression was significantly increased and caused the suppression of its target gene GPC5. Through this feature, miR-4295 is likely to be utilized in developing treatments for PDAC [34]. According to the findings of our research and many other studies in other cancer types, the high expression of miR-4295 in neoplastic tissues, when evaluated together with its target genes, suggests that it exhibits an oncogenic function in CRC. Although the expression levels of miR-4295 have been demonstrated in many cancer types, the present research is the first to analyze its expression in CRC.
Our analysis revealed a statistically significant upregulation of miR-4720-5p in tumor tissues relative to normal tissues (p < 0.001), in agreement with findings reported in various previous studies. In one of the studies supporting our findings, Kim et al. reported that high expression of miR-4720-5p in patients with intramucosal gastric cancer (IMC) was strongly correlated with lymph node metastases. Consequently, the researchers proposed that it could serve as a valuable diagnostic marker for determining the metastatic predisposition of IMCs [36]. According to another study, among various miRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, only miR-4720-5p expression was found to be higher in blood serum than in whole blood [35]. In this study, we determined a significant correlation between high miR-4720-5p expression levels in tumor tissues and various clinicopathological data such as age (age > 55), anatomical location of the tumor (colon), and histopathological classification of the tumor (adenocarcinoma) (p < 0.05). The findings of the present study correspond to those of other research within the extant literature, which demonstrate that miR-4720-5p is significantly upregulated in tumor tissues. This finding indicates that miR-4720-5p may have a role as an oncogene in the pathogenesis of CRC.
In the current study, a downregulation of miR-4773 and miR-6831-5p was found in CRC (p < 0.001). In previous research, Sang et al. reported that high expression of KIF4A, CENPF, OIP5, DEPDC1, and BUB1B genes was linked to poor overall survival in breast cancer patients, and revealed that miR-4773 was involved in the negative regulation of these genes. In the same study, the researchers stated that low expression of miR-4773 provided new information about the causes of breast cancer metastasis and was likely to be a potential therapeutic target [38]. In a different study, researchers revealed that miR-4773 is one of the few downregulated miRNAs that directly inhibits the expression of SMAD1 and SMAD4, the key transducers of osteogenic signaling in osteoblasts [65]. In contrast to the study performed by Tong et al. (2015), in which miR-4773 overexpression was observed in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) [37], we observed decreased expression of miR-4773 in malignant tissues in this study.
As the comprehensive literature reviewed within the present study shows, miR-6831-5p, the expression of which was detected below in our analysis, was also found by other researchers to have similar results in different cancer types. Kim et al. examined the relationship between IMC and miR-6831-5p and demonstrated that miR-6831-5p is markedly downregulated in malignant tissues compared with healthy counterparts. In the same study, specific genes in the E2F and AKT/mTOR signaling pathways were reported to be within the target genes of miR-6831-5p, while downregulation of miR-6831-5p was found to lead to an increase in the expression of these genes, thereby promoting carcinogenesis and metastasis [36]. A further study proved that pancreatic cancer was linked to reduced levels of miR-6831-5p, which was demonstrated to regulate the expression of the TGFBR1 and MAPK1 genes. These findings imply that low expression of miR-6831-5p may contribute to the upregulation of the TGFBR1 and MAPK1 genes, which may be associated with cancer development [40]. Contrary to the results of our study, Usuba et al. observed higher miR-6831-5p expression in the tumor tissue of bladder cancer patients compared to the control group of healthy individuals in a study with a different design [39]. We suppose that this difference may arise due to the use of a healthy control group. According to the results of our study, both miR-4773 and miR-6831-5p may function as tumor suppressors in CRC due to decreased expression levels in tumor tissues.
Although the expression level of miR-7161-5p did not show a significant difference between tumors and adjacent non-tumor tissues, the inclusion of this finding in the study is noteworthy, as such findings contribute to improving the specificity of miRNAs involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. Furthermore, its association with clinical-pathological parameters such as lymph node metastasis and invasion status suggests that it has the potential to require further investigation.
A single miRNA molecule can target hundreds of different types of mRNA and can affect the expression of many genes that often functionally interact with these mRNAs. The identification of miRNA-regulated signaling pathways and cellular processes involved in colorectal carcinogenesis using bioinformatics tools will provide important insights and improve our understanding of the complex and multi-stage molecular pathogenesis of CRC. In the present study, a KEGG pathway analysis of dysregulated miRNAs was conducted, which revealed that major signaling pathways, including endocytosis, FoxO, ErbB, TGF-beta, and mTOR, might be affected by dysregulated miRNAs. The endocytosis pathway is known to play a role in the development, progression, and regulation of cancer, and the proteins that play important roles in this signaling pathway have been associated with CRC [66,67]. FoxO transcription factors constitute a regulatory protein family involved in the control of diverse cellular processes such as cell growth, differentiation, programmed cell death, and responses to oxidative stress. FoxO transcription factors are among the key molecules that regulate a variety of biological processes during the development of CRC [68]. Furthermore, the ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase family, the TGF-beta signaling pathway, and the mTOR signaling pathway, also known as the mammalian target of rapamycin, have also been identified as important factors in the development and progression of CRC [69,70,71].
Differential expression analysis alone provides valuable insights into the potential role of miRNAs in colorectal carcinogenesis, but it does not directly indicate the functional effects of these miRNAs. To overcome this limitation, bioinformatic approaches were employed in this study using the DIANA-miRPath online database to perform target prediction and pathway enrichment analyses. This revealed that the differentially expressed miRNAs are associated with several important cancer-related signaling pathways, including the TGF-β, mTOR, ErbB, FoxO, and endocytosis pathways. These findings revealed possible molecular mechanisms that could explain the effects of these miRNAs in CRC.
Clinically, the findings of this study suggest that irregularly expressed miRNAs may have potential value as molecular biomarkers in CRC. The significant upregulation of miR-4295 and miR-4720-5p and the downregulation of miR-4773 and miR-6831-5p in tumor tissues suggest that these miRNAs play important roles in the formation of colorectal carcinogenesis and could be considered as candidate diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore, the relationship of specific miRNAs with clinical/pathological data such as tumor location, histological subtype, and tumor size further highlights their potential clinical importance. Along with the necessity for additional studies such as functional validation, these results provide a basis for future studies investigating the importance of these miRNAs in the development of early diagnosis, risk classification, and miRNA-based treatment strategies in CRC. This study has several limitations. Firstly, no experimental analysis was performed to identify the genes targeted by miRNAs. Therefore, further studies can be performed to identify the target genes of miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p that are effective in CRC. Additionally, the patient cohort was obtained from a single center, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to larger populations. The sample size of the study may not be sufficient to reveal the association between the clinicopathological data of the patients and the expression levels of miRNAs. Furthermore, certain clinical-pathological subgroups, such as patients consuming alcohol, include a relatively smaller number of subjects, which may reduce statistical power and increase the risk of type II error. Therefore, the observed relationships should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in larger, multicenter studies. Moreover, the effects of miRNAs on cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and apoptosis, inducing CRC development, have not yet been investigated in vitro. Additional validation studies, including gain-of-function and loss-of-function assays using functional in vitro experiments, will be valuable in confirming the regulatory roles of these miRNAs and their direct target genes in CRC. Although the present research has several limitations, the results will contribute to future studies to reveal the genetic mechanisms involved in determining the relationship between miRNAs and colorectal carcinogenesis.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that miR-4295 and miR-4720-5p may be associated with oncogenic processes, while miR-4773 and miR-6831-5p may be linked to tumor-suppressing mechanisms in CRC. These interpretations are primarily based on differential expression patterns and bioinformatics analyses. Although these miRNAs showed significant dysregulation in tumor tissues, functional studies are required to confirm their precise biological roles. Furthermore, to elucidate the molecular and cellular pathophysiology of CRC and develop new diagnostic and therapeutic models, more research is needed with larger patient cohorts in different populations. It is hoped that the creation of bioinformatics-supported miRNA-regulated networks will facilitate the development of new treatment methods for CRC and highlight the potential value of these miRNAs as candidate molecular biomarkers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics16040614/s1, Table S1: Common target genes of signal pathways; Table S2: Common target genes of miRNAs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.G.; methodology, R.E. and T.G.; software, T.G.; validation, T.G. and A.A.; formal analysis, R.E., T.G., A.A. and F.O.G.; investigation, R.E., T.G., A.A. and F.O.G.; resources, A.A.; data curation, R.E., T.G. and A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, R.E. and T.G.; writing—review and editing, R.E., T.G., A.A. and F.O.G.; visualization, R.E. and T.G.; supervision, T.G.; project administration, T.G.; funding acquisition, T.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Gaziantep University, Scientific Research Projects Governing Unit, grant number FEF.DT.22.01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the local ethics committee of Gaziantep University, Turkey (approval number: 2021/148, approved date: 14 July 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
APCAdenomatous polyposis coli
CtThreshold cycle
CRCColorectal cancer
ErbBErbB receptor
EGFR/MAPKEpidermal growth factor receptor/mitogen-activated protein kinase
FoxOForkhead box O
GOGene Ontology
HNSCCHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Hippo-YAPHippo signaling pathway with yes-associated protein
IMCIntramucosal gastric cancer
JAK/STATJanus kinase/signal Transducer and activator of transcription
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
miRNAmicroRNA
mTORMechanistic (mammalian) target of rapamycin
PDACPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
PI3K/AKTPhosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (AKT)
RT-qPCRQuantitative real time PCR
TGF-betaTransforming growth factor beta
VEGF/VEGFRVascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor
3′UTR3′ untranslated region

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Giaquinto, A.N.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 12–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 229–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tewary, P.; Gunatilaka, A.A.; Sayers, T.J. Using natural products to promote caspase-8-dependent cancer cell death. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2017, 66, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alzahrani, S.M.; Al Doghaither, H.A.; Al-Ghafari, A.B. General insight into cancer: An overview of colorectal cancer (Review). Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 15, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ren, J.; Zhang, P.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Shen, D.; Chen, P.; Huang, Q.; Gao, P.; Mao, C. Association of screening status, polygenic risk score and environmental risk factors with colorectal cancer incidence and mortality risks. Int. J. Cancer 2023, 152, 1778–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, X.J.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, J.; Zheng, J.B.; Qiu, M.Z.; Ju, H.Q.; Xu, R.H. Novel Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers of Prognostic and Predictive Significance in Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jung, G.; Hernández-Illán, E.; Moreira, L.; Balaguer, F.; Goel, A. Epigenetics of colorectal cancer: Biomarker and therapeutic potential. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 111–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jung, Y.D.; Park, S.K.; Kang, D.; Hwang, S.; Kang, M.H.; Hong, S.W.; Moon, J.H.; Shin, J.S.; Jin, D.H.; You, D.; et al. Epigenetic regulation of miR-29a/miR-30c/DNMT3A axis controls SOD2 and mitochondrial oxidative stress in human mesenchymal stem cells. Redox Biol. 2020, 37, 101716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shu, Y.; Lan, J.; Hu, Z.; Liu, W.; Song, R. Epigenetic regulation of RARB overcomes the radio-resistance of colorectal carcinoma cells via cancer stem cells. J. Radiat. Res. 2023, 64, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, P.; Zhang, T.; Chen, D.; Gong, L.; Sun, M. Prognosis and Novel Drug Targets for Key lncRNAs of Epigenetic Modification in Colorectal Cancer. Mediat. Inflamm. 2023, 2023, 6632205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dasgupta, I.; Chatterjee, A. Recent Advances in miRNA Delivery Systems. Methods Protoc. 2021, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kearney, M.; Duncan, H.F. Micro-RNA Profiling in Dental Pulp Cell Cultures. Methods Mol. Biol. 2023, 2588, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mehrgou, A.; Ebadollahi, S.; Seidi, K.; Ayoubi-Joshaghani, M.H.; Ahmadieh Yazdi, A.; Zare, P.; Jaymand, M.; Jahanban-Esfahlan, R. Roles of miRNAs in Colorectal Cancer: Therapeutic Implications and Clinical Opportunities. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2021, 11, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, F.; Wong, S.C.; Chan, L.W.; Cho, W.C.; Yip, S.P.; Yung, B.Y. Multiple regression analysis of mRNA-miRNA associations in colorectal cancer pathway. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 676724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Avsar, R.; Gurer, T.; Aytekin, A. Bioinformatics and Expression Analyses of miR-639, miR-641, miR-1915-3p and miR-3613-3p in Colorectal Cancer Pathogenesis. J. Cancer 2023, 14, 2399–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, A.Q.; Ahmed, E.I.; Elareer, N.R.; Junejo, K.; Steinhoff, M.; Uddin, S. Role of miRNA-Regulated Cancer Stem Cells in the Pathogenesis of Human Malignancies. Cells 2019, 8, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, B.; Xia, Z.; Deng, Y.N.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, H.; Xu, N.; Liang, S. Emerging microRNA biomarkers for colorectal cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Open Biol. 2019, 9, 180212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pian, C.; Zhang, G.; Gao, L.; Fan, X.; Li, F. miR + Pathway: The integration and visualization of miRNA and KEGG pathways. Brief. Bioinform. 2020, 21, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, J.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Mao, M.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Pian, C. NcPath: A novel platform for visualization and enrichment analysis of human non-coding RNA and KEGG signaling pathways. Bioinformatics 2023, 39, btac812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zuo, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zeng, S.; Li, Y.; Fan, J.; Guo, Y.; Tao, H. The value of microRNAs as the novel biomarkers for colorectal cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2020, 216, 153130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Traber, G.M.; Yu, A.M. RNAi-Based Therapeutics and Novel RNA Bioengineering Technologies. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2023, 384, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Niu, L.; Yang, W.; Duan, L.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Xu, C.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Liu, J.; et al. Biological Implications and Clinical Potential of Metastasis-Related miRNA in Colorectal Cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2021, 23, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Moiz, S.; Saha, B.; Mondal, V.; Bishnu, D.; Das, B.; Bose, B.; Das, S.; Banerjee, N.; Dutta, A.; Chatterjee, K.; et al. Differential Expression of miRNAs Between Young-Onset and Late-Onset Indian Colorectal Carcinoma Patients. Non-Coding RNA 2025, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gurer, T.; Aytekin, A.; Caki, E.; Gezici, S. miR-485-3p and miR-4728-5p as tumor suppressors in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Mol. Biol. 2022, 56, 474–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Omar, A.; Govan, D.; Penny, C. Epigenetic regulation in colorectal cancer: The susceptibility of microRNAs 145, 143 and 133b to DNA demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibitors. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0289800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Susanti, R.; Dafip, M.; Mustikaningtyas, D. OncomiR structure and network prediction on adenomatosis polyposis coli (APC) gene silencing regulation in colorectal cancer. Trends Sci. 2023, 20, 10034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jia, L.; Luo, S.; Ren, X.; Li, Y.; Hu, J.; Liu, B.; Zhao, L.; Shan, Y.; Zhou, H. miR-182 and miR-135b Mediate the Tumorigenesis and Invasiveness of Colorectal Cancer Cells via Targeting ST6GALNAC2 and PI3K/AKT Pathway. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017, 62, 3447–3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cheng, J.P.; Huang, B.; Duan, J.H.; Yi, K.J.; Zhuang, Z.L. miR-4295 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion of osteosarcoma through targeting interferon regulatory factor 1. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 20, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, X.; Zheng, J.; Diao, H.; Liu, Y. RUNX3 is down-regulated in glioma by Myc-regulated miR-4295. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2016, 20, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Toraih, E.A.; Elshazli, R.M.; Trinh, L.N.; Hussein, M.H.; Attia, A.A.; Ruiz, E.M.L.; Zerfaoui, M.; Fawzy, M.S.; Kandil, E. Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of Liquid Biopsy-Derived Exosomal MicroRNAs in Thyroid Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2021, 13, 4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, X.; Yang, J.; Tang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, X.; Gan, R. miR-4295 Promotes the Malignant Progression of Gastric Cancer via Targeting PTEN. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2022, 25, 1897–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nan, Y.H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Sun, P.H.; Han, Y.P.; Fan, L.; Wang, K.C.; Shen, F.J.; Wang, W.H. MiR-4295 promotes cell growth in bladder cancer by targeting BTG1. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 4892–4901. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Yuan, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Cao, G.; Yang, W. High expression of microRNA-4295 contributes to cell proliferation and invasion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by the down-regulation of Glypican-5. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 497, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pascut, D.; Sukowati, C.H.C.; Antoniali, G.; Mangiapane, G.; Burra, S.; Mascaretti, L.G.; Buonocore, M.R.; Crocè, L.S.; Tiribelli, C.; Tell, G. Serum AP-endonuclease 1 (sAPE1) as novel biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 2019, 10, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, S.; Bae, W.J.; Ahn, J.M.; Heo, J.H.; Kim, K.M.; Choi, K.W.; Sung, C.O.; Lee, D. MicroRNA signatures associated with lymph node metastasis in intramucosal gastric cancer. Mod. Pathol. 2021, 34, 672–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tong, H.X.; Zhou, Y.H.; Hou, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Xie, B.; Wang, J.Y.; Jiang, Q.; He, J.Y.; Shao, Y.B.; et al. Expression profile of microRNAs in gastrointestinal stromal tumors revealed by high throughput quantitative RT-PCR microarray. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 5843–5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sang, M.; Wu, M.; Meng, L.; Zheng, Y.; Gu, L.; Liu, F.; Sang, M. Identification of epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related circRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA regulatory network in breast cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2020, 216, 153088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Usuba, W.; Urabe, F.; Yamamoto, Y.; Matsuzaki, J.; Sasaki, H.; Ichikawa, M.; Takizawa, S.; Aoki, Y.; Niida, S.; Kato, K.; et al. Circulating miRNA panels for specific and early detection in bladder cancer. Cancer Sci. 2019, 110, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aita, A.; Millino, C.; Sperti, C.; Pacchioni, B.; Plebani, M.; De Pittà, C.; Basso, D. Serum miRNA Profiling for Early PDAC Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Retrospective Study. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. O’Neill, F.; Allen-Coyle, T.J.; Roche, S.; Meiller, J.; Conlon, N.T.; Swan, N.; Straubinger, R.M.; Geoghegan, J.; Straubinger, N.L.; Conlon, K.; et al. Alteration in Levels of Specific miRNAs and Their Potential Protein Targets between Human Pancreatic Cancer Samples, Adjacent Normal Tissue, and Xenografts Derived from These Tumors. Life 2023, 13, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fan, J.; Tang, Y.; Wang, K.; Yang, S.; Ma, B. Predictive miRNAs Patterns in Blood of Breast Cancer Patients Demonstrating Resistance Towards Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Breast Cancer 2023, 15, 591–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, W.T.; Zhang, G.X.; Zhao, R.Z.; Gao, S.S. The potential diagnostic accuracy of circulating microRNAs for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Actas Urol. Esp. (Engl. Ed.) 2022, 46, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. The Diana Tools. Available online: http://www.microrna.gr/miRPathv3 (accessed on 2 September 2025).
  46. The Venny 2.1. Available online: https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny (accessed on 13 September 2025).
  47. Cao, Q.; Tian, Y.; Deng, Z.; Yang, F.; Chen, E. Epigenetic Alteration in Colorectal Cancer: Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Adebayo, A.S.; Agbaje, K.; Adesina, S.K.; Olajubutu, O. Colorectal Cancer: Disease Process, Current Treatment Options, and Future Perspectives. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tepus, M.; Yau, T.O. Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Overview. Gastrointest. Tumors 2020, 7, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Biller, L.H.; Schrag, D. Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review. JAMA 2021, 325, 669–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mármol, I.; Sánchez-de-Diego, C.; Pradilla Dieste, A.; Cerrada, E.; Rodriguez Yoldi, M.J. Colorectal Carcinoma: A General Overview and Future Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, H.; Meng, Q.; Qian, J.; Li, M.; Gu, C.; Yang, Y. Review: RNA-based diagnostic markers discovery and therapeutic targets development in cancer. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 234, 108123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mone, P.; Jankauskas, S.S.; Manzi, M.V.; Gambardella, J.; Coppola, A.; Kansakar, U.; Izzo, R.; Fiorentino, G.; Lombardi, A.; Varzideh, F.; et al. Endothelial Extracellular Vesicles Enriched in microRNA-34a Predict New-Onset Diabetes in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients: Novel Insights for Long COVID Metabolic Sequelae. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2024, 389, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sado, A.I.; Batool, W.; Ahmed, A.; Zafar, S.; Patel, S.K.; Mohan, A.; Zia, U.; Aminpoor, H.; Kumar, V.; Tejwaney, U. Role of microRNA in colorectal carcinoma (CRC): A narrative review. Ann. Med. Surg. 2024, 86, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Calin, G.A.; Sevignani, C.; Dumitru, C.D.; Hyslop, T.; Noch, E.; Yendamuri, S.; Shimizu, M.; Rattan, S.; Bullrich, F.; Negrini, M.; et al. Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2999–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Nalbant, E.; Akkaya-Ulum, Y.Z. Exploring regulatory mechanisms on miRNAs and their implications in inflammation-related diseases. Clin. Exp. Med. 2024, 24, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Menon, A.; Abd-Aziz, N.; Khalid, K.; Poh, C.L.; Naidu, R. miRNA: A Promising Therapeutic Target in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, D.; Geng, W.; Han, L.; Song, R.; Qu, Q.; Chen, X.; Luo, X. Pro-carcinogenic actions of miR-155/FOXO3a in colorectal cancer development. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2023, 69, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Park, Y.R.; Seo, S.Y.; Kim, S.L.; Zhu, S.M.; Chun, S.; Oh, J.M.; Lee, M.R.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, I.H.; Lee, S.O.; et al. MiRNA-206 suppresses PGE2-induced colorectal cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by targetting TM4SF1. Biosci. Rep. 2018, 38, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Aytekin, A.; Kadakal, H.; Mihcioglu, D.; Gurer, T. Bioinformatics analysis of miR-2861 and miR-5011-5p that function as potential tumor suppressors in colorectal carcinogenesis. BMC Med. Genom. 2025, 18, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Griffiths-Jones, S.; Grocock, R.J.; van Dongen, S.; Bateman, A.; Enright, A.J. miRBase: MicroRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D140–D144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yan, R.; Li, K.; Yuan, D.W.; Wang, H.N.; Zhang, Y.; Dang, C.X.; Zhu, K. Downregulation of microRNA-4295 enhances cisplatin-induced gastric cancer cell apoptosis through the EGFR/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by targeting LRIG1. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 53, 2566–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liang, G.; Duan, C.; He, J.; Ma, W.; Dai, X. PTPN14, a target gene of miR-4295, restricts the growth and invasion of osteosarcoma cells through inactivation of YAP1 signalling. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2020, 47, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lu, S.; Zhou, C.; Zou, B.; Zhang, H.; Feng, M. MiR-4295 facilitates cell proliferation and metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by targeting NPTX1. Genes Immun. 2020, 21, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kato, R.B.; Roy, B.; De Oliveira, F.S.; Ferraz, E.P.; De Oliveira, P.T.; Kemper, A.G.; Hassan, M.Q.; Rosa, A.L.; Beloti, M.M. Nanotopography directs mesenchymal stem cells to osteoblast lineage through regulation of microRNA-SMAD-BMP-2 circuit. J. Cell. Physiol. 2014, 229, 1690–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Banushi, B.; Joseph, S.R.; Lum, B.; Lee, J.J.; Simpson, F. Endocytosis in cancer and cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2023, 23, 450–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Song, Y.; Chen, M.; Wei, Y.; Ma, X.; Shi, H. Signaling pathways in colorectal cancer implications for the target therapies. Mol. Biomed. 2024, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Laissue, P. The forkhead-box family of transcription factors: Key molecular players in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zou, Z.; Tao, T.; Li, H.; Zhu, X. mTOR signaling pathway and mTOR inhibitors in cancer: Progress and challenges. Cell Biosci. 2020, 10, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, F.; Xuan, G.; Chen, Y.; Cao, L.; Zhao, M.; Wang, C.; Chen, E. MicroRNAs Are Key Molecules Involved in the Gene Regulation Network of Colorectal Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 828128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Q.; Geng, S.; Luo, H.; Wang, W.; Mo, Y.Q.; Luo, Q.; Wang, L.; Song, G.B.; Sheng, J.P.; Xu, B. Signaling pathways involved in colorectal cancer: Pathogenesis and targeted therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Expression patterns of miR-4295 (A), miR-4720-5p (B), miR-4773 (C), miR-6831-5p (D), and miR-7161-5p (E) in tumor and non-tumor tissues of CRC patients.
Figure 1. Expression patterns of miR-4295 (A), miR-4720-5p (B), miR-4773 (C), miR-6831-5p (D), and miR-7161-5p (E) in tumor and non-tumor tissues of CRC patients.
Diagnostics 16 00614 g001
Figure 2. Venn diagram illustrating the common and pathway-specific target genes of four dysregulated miRNAs involved in CRC–associated pathways, including endocytosis, the FoxO signaling pathway, signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells, and the ErbB signaling pathway (the list of genes is reported in Supplementary Table S1).
Figure 2. Venn diagram illustrating the common and pathway-specific target genes of four dysregulated miRNAs involved in CRC–associated pathways, including endocytosis, the FoxO signaling pathway, signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells, and the ErbB signaling pathway (the list of genes is reported in Supplementary Table S1).
Diagnostics 16 00614 g002
Figure 3. Venn diagram illustrating the intersection of target genes involved in common signaling pathways of dysregulated miRNAs (the list of genes is reported in Supplementary Table S2).
Figure 3. Venn diagram illustrating the intersection of target genes involved in common signaling pathways of dysregulated miRNAs (the list of genes is reported in Supplementary Table S2).
Diagnostics 16 00614 g003
Table 1. Primer sequences of miRNA.
Table 1. Primer sequences of miRNA.
miRNAPrimerSequence (5′–3′).
miR-4295ForwardGCAGCAGTGCAATGTTTTC
ReverseGGTCCAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTAAGG
miR-4720-5pForwardCAGCCTGGCATATTTGGT
ReverseAGGTCCAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTAAGT
miR-4773ForwardCAGCAGAACAGGAGCATAG
ReverseTCCAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGCCTT
miR-6831-5pForwardGGTAGAGTGTGAGGAGGAG
ReverseGGTCCAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGAC
miR-7161-5pForwardGCAGTAAAGACTGTAGAGGCA
ReverseTCCAGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTACCAGTT
RNU6ForwardGCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT
ReverseCGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT
Table 2. Baseline demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of the CRC cohort.
Table 2. Baseline demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of the CRC cohort.
CharacteristicsPatients N (%)
Age (years)
≥5553 (61.6)
<5533 (38.4)
Gender
Male54 (62.8)
Female32 (37.2)
Cigarette smoking
Yes26 (30.2)
No60 (69.8)
Alcohol drinking
Yes4 (4.7)
No82 (95.3)
Tumor location
Colon61 (70.9)
Rectum25 (29.1)
Invasion
T1 + T216 (18.6)
T3 + T470 (81.4)
Neural invasion
Yes17 (19.8)
No69 (80.2)
Lymphovascular invasion
Yes24 (27.9)
No62 (72.1)
Distant metastasis
M071 (83.7)
M114 (16.3)
Lymph node metastasis
N047 (54.7)
N1 + N239 (45.3)
Tumor stage
I–II42 (48.8)
III–IV44 (51.2)
Tumor size (cm)
≤654 (62.8)
>632 (37.2)
Tumor histological type
Adenocarcinoma69 (80.2)
Mucinous adenocarcinoma17 (19.8)
(N0, no regional lymph node metastasis; N1, 1–3 pericolic lymph node involvement; N2, 2–4 pericolic lymph node involvement or perirectal involvement; M0, no distant metastasis; M1, metastasis in more than one organ/region or peritoneum; T1, tumor invading the submucosa; T2, tumor invading the muscularis propria; T3, tumor invading the pericolorectal fatty tissue by crossing the muscularis propria; T4, tumor adhering to or invading the visceral peritoneum or adjacent organs or structures).
Table 3. Relationship between clinicopathological parameters of CRC patients and miRNA expression profiles.
Table 3. Relationship between clinicopathological parameters of CRC patients and miRNA expression profiles.
VariablesmiR-4295miR-4720-5pmiR-4773miR-6831-5pmiR-7161-5p
LowHighpLowHighpLowHighpLowHighpLowHighp
Age (years)
≥5510430.42716370.031 *41120.7974670.55028251.000
˂55924 330 249 276 1716
Gender
Male14400.29710440.42044100.1224950.06431230.267
Female527 923 2111 248 1418
Cigarette smoking
Yes9170.0905210.7821970.7872420.32713130.817
No1050 1446 4614 4911 3228
Alcohol drinking
Yes131.000040.571400.568401.000130.344
No1864 1963 6121 6931 4438
Tumor location
Colon15460.56817440.049 *45160.59450110.33033280.641
Rectum421 223 205 232 1213
Invasion
T1 + T22140.5055110.332970.0581421.0004120.025 *
T3 + T41753 1456 5614 5911 4129
Neural invasion
Yes2150.3403140.7531250.7531430.715981.000
No1752 1653 5316 5910 3633
Lymphovascular invasion
Yes5191.0005191.0001950.7821950.50211130.480
No1448 1448 4616 548 3428
Distant metastasis
M017550.72615570.50055170.73862100.4373960.562
M1212 410 104 113 338
Lenf node metastasis
N010371.00010371.00032150.0853980.76419280.018 *
N1 + N2930 930 336 345 2613
Tumor stage
I-II10320.7979331.00029130.2123570.76918240.130
III-IV935 1034 368 386 2717
Tumor size (cm)
≤614400.29712421.00040140.7975040.014 *27270.657
>6527 725 257 239 1814
Tumor histological type
Adenocarcinoma15541.00019500.018 *56130.025 *6270.018 *39300.175
Mucinous adenocarcinoma413 017 98 116 611
*: p value is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Table 4. Correlation between miRNAs.
Table 4. Correlation between miRNAs.
miR-4295miR4720-5pmiR-4773miR-6831-5p
miR-4295r1.0000.408 **0.001−0.140
p value.<0.0010.9930.067
miR-4720-5pr0.408 **1.000−0.143−0.245 **
p value<0.001.0.062<0.001
miR-4773r0.001−0.1431.0000.649 **
p value0.9930.062.<0.001
miR-6831-5pr−0.140−0.245 **0.649 **1.000
p value0.067<0.001<0.001.
r: Correlation Coefficient; **: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 5. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of target genes associated with miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p across biological process, cellular component, and molecular function categories.
Table 5. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of target genes associated with miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p across biological process, cellular component, and molecular function categories.
Biological Process
GO IDGO term namep-valueTarget gene counts
GO:0034641Cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process3.47817584956 × 10−30425
GO:0009058Biosynthetic process3.93511188734 × 10−22360
GO:0006464Cellular protein modification process3.76953500217 × 10−14214
GO:0010467Gene expression5.78640712256 × 10−1164
GO:0007267Cell-cell signaling3.30789780557 × 10−978
GO:0038095Fc-epsilon receptor signaling pathway1.47657403515 × 10−825
GO:0007268Synaptic transmission4.71710702933 × 10−751
GO:0048011Neurotrophins TRK receptor signaling pathway1.12711148506 × 10−630
GO:0065003Macromolecular complex assembly1.55152673455 × 10−685
GO:0022607Cellular component assembly5.97672344625 × 10−6114
GO:0007173Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway1.76728381298 × 10−528
GO:0008543Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling pathway0.00038681726106325
GO:0006461Protein complex assembly0.00038681726106370
GO:0048015Phosphatidylinositol-mediated signaling0.00043442696632420
GO:0043687Post-translational protein modification0.001073840388919
GO:0006351Transcription, DNA-templated0.00142425137299206
GO:0006950Response to stress0.00149198607409172
GO:0009056Catabolic process0.00163676996544144
GO:0006367Transcription initiation from RNA polymerase II promoter0.0029968261346426
GO:0007179Transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathway0.003800670389225
GO:0008219Cell death0.0047651139985476
GO:0000278Mitotic cell cycle0.0058572146585133
GO:0044267Cellular protein metabolic process0.011154581227536
GO:0016032Viral process0.011681326612736
GO:0061024Membrane organization0.012162788572748
GO:0044281Small molecule metabolic process0.0121710803496160
GO:0009887Organ morphogenesis0.012979564999424
GO:0044403Symbiosis, encompassing mutualism through parasitism0.021884471058839
GO:0016070RNA metabolic process0.039232695038622
GO:0000288Nuclear-transcribed mRNA catabolic process, deadenylation-dependent decay0.04843970811439
GO:0008150Biological process0.02900995210071201
Cellular Component
GO IDGO term namep-valueTarget gene counts
GO:0043226Organelle 1.00780607172 × 10−48820
GO:0043234Protein complex1.24440475458 × 10−10322
GO:0005829Cytosol1.00963526144 × 10−5222
GO:0005654Nucleoplasm2.52204325661 × 10−5104
GO:0005575Cellular component1.0841859996 × 10−61268
Molecular Function
GO IDGO term namep-valueTarget gene counts
GO:0043167Ion binding1.98593181043 × 10−21492
GO:0000988Protein binding transcription factor activity2.80440576603 × 10−1164
GO:0001071Nucleic acid binding transcription factor activity1.02377765451 × 10−590
GO:0019899Enzyme binding1.02377765451 × 10−5113
GO:0030234Enzyme regulator activity0.02905611483368
GO:0003674Molecular function8.97234178148 × 10−101269
Table 6. KEGG analysis of dysregulated miRNAs in tissues of CRC patients.
Table 6. KEGG analysis of dysregulated miRNAs in tissues of CRC patients.
PathwaysPathways IDmiRNAsTarget Genesp-Value
Gliomahsa05214miR-4295SOS2, TGFA, CALM2, SOS1, IGF1, CDKN1A, PTEN0.0013
miR-4720-5pCAMK2A
miR-4773CAMK2D, CDK6, E2F3
miR-6831-5pBRAF, IGF1R
Endocytosishsa04144miR-4295RNF41, ARAP2, MET, SMURF2, CLTC, CHMP4B, ASAP1, RAB5A, CBLB, EPS15, ZFYVE9, HSPA8, LDLR, TGFBR20.0017
miR-4720-5pAGAP1, ERBB3
miR-4773TGFBR1, SMAD2, CHMP4C, CAV2, CBLB, TRAF6, EPS15, DNM1, PIP5K1A, STAMBP, FGFR2, KDR, PARD6B, ERBB4
miR-6831-5pTGFBR1, SMAD6, IGF1R, ADRB3
FoxO signaling pathwayhsa04068miR-4295RAG1, SOS2, PRKAA2, GADD45A, S1PR1, SOS1, PRKAA1, IGF1, SOD2, CDKN1A, PTEN, CCNG2, TGFBR2, BCL2L110.0114
miR-4720-5pPRKAG1
miR-4773TGFBR1, SMAD2, SMAD4, SOD2
miR-6831-5pBRAF, TGFBR1, IGF1R, NLK, PDPK1
Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cellshsa04550miR-4295JARID2, INHBB, HOXB1, WNT2B, INHBA, ACVR1, SMAD5, IGF10.0137
miR-4720-5pSMARCAD1, JAK2
miR-4773SMAD2, PCGF5, SMAD4, LIFR, ACVR1C, FGFR2
miR-6831-5pHAND1, SMARCAD1, WNT2B, IGF1R, FZD3, ACVR2B, SKIL, ACVR1C, WNT9A
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchorbio synthesishsa00563miR-4295PGAP1, PIGP, PIGA0.0190
miR-4720-5pPIGB, PIGA
miR-4773PYURF
miR-6831-5pPIGN
ErbB signaling pathwayhsa04012miR-4295SOS2, TGFA, CBLB, SOS1, CDKN1A, ABL2, EREG0.0244
miR-4720-5pERBB3, CAMK2A, NRG1
miR-4773CAMK2D, CBLB, ABL2, ERBB4
miR-6831-5pBRAF, RPS6KB2
TGF-beta signaling pathwayhsa04350miR-4295INHBB, SMURF2, INHBA, ACVR1, SKP1, ZFYVE9, SMAD5, TGFBR26.48 × 10−9
miR-4773TGFBR1, SMAD2, SMAD4, TFDP1, ACVR1C,
PPP2R1B
miR-6831-5pTGFBR1, SMAD6, RPS6KB2, ACVR2B, E2F5, GDF6, ACVR1C
Morphine addictionhsa05032miR-4295GABRA1, ADCY1, GABRA3, KCNJ61.99 × 10−6
miR-4773PDE1C, GABBR2, GABRA5, GABRP
miR-6831-5pGNB3, ADORA1, KCNJ6, GABRR1, GNG5
GABAergic synapsehsa04727miR-4295GABRA1, ADCY1, GABRA3, KCNJ64.93 × 10−6
miR-4773SLC38A1, GPHN, GABBR2, GABRA5, GAD2, GABRP, SLC6A13, SLC6A1
miR-6831-5pGNB3, TRAK2, GLUL, KCNJ6, GABRR1, GNG5
Mtor signaling pathwayhsa04150miR-4295TSC1, RRAGD, PRKAA2, PRKAA1, IGF1, EIF4E2, PTEN, ULK20.0244
miR-4773TSC1
miR-6831-5pBRAF, RPS6KB2, RICTOR, ULK3, PDPK1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eskin, R.; Gurer, T.; Aytekin, A.; Ozbas Gerceker, F. Expression Analysis of miRNA Profiles in Colorectal Cancer with a Bioinformatics Approach: An Emphasis on miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p. Diagnostics 2026, 16, 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040614

AMA Style

Eskin R, Gurer T, Aytekin A, Ozbas Gerceker F. Expression Analysis of miRNA Profiles in Colorectal Cancer with a Bioinformatics Approach: An Emphasis on miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p. Diagnostics. 2026; 16(4):614. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040614

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eskin, Recep, Turkan Gurer, Alper Aytekin, and Filiz Ozbas Gerceker. 2026. "Expression Analysis of miRNA Profiles in Colorectal Cancer with a Bioinformatics Approach: An Emphasis on miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p" Diagnostics 16, no. 4: 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040614

APA Style

Eskin, R., Gurer, T., Aytekin, A., & Ozbas Gerceker, F. (2026). Expression Analysis of miRNA Profiles in Colorectal Cancer with a Bioinformatics Approach: An Emphasis on miR-4295, miR-4720-5p, miR-4773, and miR-6831-5p. Diagnostics, 16(4), 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040614

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop