This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Radiologist-Validated Automatic Lumbar T1-Weighted Spinal MRI Segmentation Tool via an Attention U-Net Algorithm
by
Aryan Kalluvila
Aryan Kalluvila 1,*
,
Ethan Wang
Ethan Wang 2,
Michael C Hurley
Michael C Hurley 3,
Colbey Freeman
Colbey Freeman 4
and
Jason M. Johnson
Jason M. Johnson 5
1
Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60201, USA
2
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
3
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
4
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
5
Section of Neuroradiology, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(23), 3046; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233046 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 October 2025
/
Revised: 1 November 2025
/
Accepted: 9 November 2025
/
Published: 28 November 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Spinal MRI segmentation has become increasingly important with the prevalence of disc herniation and vertebral injuries. Artificial intelligence can help orthopedic surgeons and radiologists automate the process of segmentation. Currently, there are few tools for T1-weighted spinal MRI segmentation, with most focusing on T2-weighted imaging. This paper focuses on creating an automatic lumbar spinal MRI segmentation tool for T1-weighted images using deep learning. Methods: An Attention U-Net was employed as the main algorithm because the architecture has shown success in other segmentation applications. Segmentation loss functions were compared, focusing on the difference between BCE and MSE loss. Two board-certified radiologists scored the output of the Attention U-Net versus four other algorithms to assess clinical relevance and segmentation accuracy. Results: The Attention U-Net achieved superior results, with SSIM and DICE coefficients of 0.998 and 0.93, outperforming other architectures. Both radiologists agreed that the Attention U-Net segmented lumbar spinal images with the highest accuracy on the Likert Scale (3.7 ± 0.82). Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was measured at 0.31, indicating a fair level of agreement. MSE loss outperformed BCE with respect to both SSIM and DICE, serving as the loss function of choice. Conclusions: Qualitative observations showed that the Attention U-Net and U-Net++ were the top performing networks. However, the Attention U-Net minimized external noise and focused on internal spinal preservation, demonstrating strong segmentation performance for T1-weighted lumbar spinal MRI.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kalluvila, A.; Wang, E.; Hurley, M.C.; Freeman, C.; Johnson, J.M.
Radiologist-Validated Automatic Lumbar T1-Weighted Spinal MRI Segmentation Tool via an Attention U-Net Algorithm. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 3046.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233046
AMA Style
Kalluvila A, Wang E, Hurley MC, Freeman C, Johnson JM.
Radiologist-Validated Automatic Lumbar T1-Weighted Spinal MRI Segmentation Tool via an Attention U-Net Algorithm. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(23):3046.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233046
Chicago/Turabian Style
Kalluvila, Aryan, Ethan Wang, Michael C Hurley, Colbey Freeman, and Jason M. Johnson.
2025. "Radiologist-Validated Automatic Lumbar T1-Weighted Spinal MRI Segmentation Tool via an Attention U-Net Algorithm" Diagnostics 15, no. 23: 3046.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233046
APA Style
Kalluvila, A., Wang, E., Hurley, M. C., Freeman, C., & Johnson, J. M.
(2025). Radiologist-Validated Automatic Lumbar T1-Weighted Spinal MRI Segmentation Tool via an Attention U-Net Algorithm. Diagnostics, 15(23), 3046.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233046
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.