Next Article in Journal
Predictive Factors Correlated with Successful Early Endoscopic Removal of Pancreaticolithiasis in Chronic Pancreatitis after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Clinical Radiomics-Based Models to Predict Survival Outcome in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Journal
Plurihormonal Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinical Relevance of Immunohistochemical Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improved Cervical Lymph Node Characterization among Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using MR Texture Analysis Compared to Traditional FDG-PET/MR Features Alone
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ChatGPT’s Accuracy on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Basics: Characteristics and Limitations Depending on the Question Type

Department of Radiology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(2), 171; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020171
Submission received: 4 December 2023 / Revised: 4 January 2024 / Accepted: 11 January 2024 / Published: 12 January 2024

Abstract

Our study aimed to assess the accuracy and limitations of ChatGPT in the domain of MRI, focused on evaluating ChatGPT’s performance in answering simple knowledge questions and specialized multiple-choice questions related to MRI. A two-step approach was used to evaluate ChatGPT. In the first step, 50 simple MRI-related questions were asked, and ChatGPT’s answers were categorized as correct, partially correct, or incorrect by independent researchers. In the second step, 75 multiple-choice questions covering various MRI topics were posed, and the answers were similarly categorized. The study utilized Cohen’s kappa coefficient for assessing interobserver agreement. ChatGPT demonstrated high accuracy in answering straightforward MRI questions, with over 85% classified as correct. However, its performance varied significantly across multiple-choice questions, with accuracy rates ranging from 40% to 66.7%, depending on the topic. This indicated a notable gap in its ability to handle more complex, specialized questions requiring deeper understanding and context. In conclusion, this study critically evaluates the accuracy of ChatGPT in addressing questions related to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), highlighting its potential and limitations in the healthcare sector, particularly in radiology. Our findings demonstrate that ChatGPT, while proficient in responding to straightforward MRI-related questions, exhibits variability in its ability to accurately answer complex multiple-choice questions that require more profound, specialized knowledge of MRI. This discrepancy underscores the nuanced role AI can play in medical education and healthcare decision-making, necessitating a balanced approach to its application.
Keywords: ChatGPT; MCQ; MRI ChatGPT; MCQ; MRI

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, K.-H.; Lee, R.-W. ChatGPT’s Accuracy on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Basics: Characteristics and Limitations Depending on the Question Type. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020171

AMA Style

Lee K-H, Lee R-W. ChatGPT’s Accuracy on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Basics: Characteristics and Limitations Depending on the Question Type. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(2):171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Kyu-Hong, and Ro-Woon Lee. 2024. "ChatGPT’s Accuracy on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Basics: Characteristics and Limitations Depending on the Question Type" Diagnostics 14, no. 2: 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020171

APA Style

Lee, K.-H., & Lee, R.-W. (2024). ChatGPT’s Accuracy on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Basics: Characteristics and Limitations Depending on the Question Type. Diagnostics, 14(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop