Article Versions Notes

Burchardt E, Warenczak-Florczak Z, Cegła P, Piotrowski A, Cybulski Z, Burchardt W, Roszak A, Cholewiński W. Differences between [¹⁸F]FLT and [¹⁸F]FDG Uptake in PET/CT Imaging in CC Depend on Vaginal Bacteriology. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(1):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010070

Burchardt, Ewa, Zaneta Warenczak-Florczak, Paulina Cegła, Adam Piotrowski, Zefiryn Cybulski, Wojciech Burchardt, Andrzej Roszak, and Witold Cholewiński. 2022. "Differences between [¹⁸F]FLT and [¹⁸F]FDG Uptake in PET/CT Imaging in CC Depend on Vaginal Bacteriology" Diagnostics 12, no. 1: 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010070

Burchardt, E., Warenczak-Florczak, Z., Cegła, P., Piotrowski, A., Cybulski, Z., Burchardt, W., Roszak, A., & Cholewiński, W. (2022). Differences between [¹⁸F]FLT and [¹⁸F]FDG Uptake in PET/CT Imaging in CC Depend on Vaginal Bacteriology. Diagnostics, 12(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010070