Next Article in Journal
AI Denoising Significantly Improves Image Quality in Whole-Body Low-Dose Computed Tomography Staging
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Tongue Characteristics Classified According to Ultrasonographic Features Using a K-Means Clustering Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of FDG PET/CT and Bone Marrow Biopsy Results in Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma with Subgroup Analysis of PET Radiomics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deep Learning-Based Microscopic Diagnosis of Odontogenic Keratocysts and Non-Keratocysts in Haematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Incisional Biopsies
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Artificial Intelligence Application in Assessment of Panoramic Radiographs

Diagnostics 2022, 12(1), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010224
by Łukasz Zadrożny 1,*, Piotr Regulski 2, Katarzyna Brus-Sawczuk 3, Marta Czajkowska 4,*, Laszlo Parkanyi 5, Scott Ganz 6,7 and Eitan Mijiritsky 8,9
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2022, 12(1), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010224
Submission received: 29 December 2021 / Revised: 12 January 2022 / Accepted: 14 January 2022 / Published: 17 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence in Oral Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  • KINDLY CHECK THE WRITING STYLE, MINOR REVISION NEEDED.
  • IN THE CONLUSION YOU WROTE: "WITHIN THE LIMITATIONS OF THIS RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.."  WITHOUT ANY DETAILS. TRY TO ADD THOSE LIMITATIONS AT THE END OF THE DISCUSSION WITH DETAILS.

 

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1,
Thank You for Your suggestions. Article was once again checked by the native speaker and 
all appropriate corrections were done. We have changed the conclusion section and described 
limitations at the end of the discussion.
With Best Regards

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors aimed to assess the reliability of Artificial Inteligence (AI) automatic evaluation of panoramic radiographs (PRs).

The study covers some issues that have been overlooked in other similar topics. The structure of the manuscript appears adequate. Overall, the manuscript was written in good English and easy to understand and follow. Some of the comments that would improve the overall quality of the study are:

1-) Please check typos thorough the text

2-) Conclusion Section: This paragraph required a general revision to eliminate redundant sentences and to add some "take-home message".

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2,
Thank You for Your suggestions. Article was once again checked by the native speaker and all 
appropriate corrections were done. We have changed the conclusion section to make 
it more clear.
With Best Regards

Back to TopTop