Next Article in Journal
Microbial Translocation and Perinatal Asphyxia/Hypoxia: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of an Insulin Resistance Predicting Model Using a Machine-Learning Approach in a Population-Based Cohort in Korea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Characterization of VIM and MCR Co-Producers: The First Two Clinical Cases, in Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Resistome and Virulome of Multi-Drug Resistant E. coli ST131 Isolated from Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities in the Northern Italian Region

by
Sabrina Cherubini
1,
Mariagrazia Perilli
1,†,
Anna Maria Azzini
2,
Evelina Tacconelli
2,
Laura Maccacaro
3,
Alda Bazaj
3,
Laura Naso
3,
Gianfranco Amicosante
1,
LTCF-Veneto Working Group
,
Giuliana Lo Cascio
3,4,† and
Alessandra Piccirilli
1,*
1
Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
2
Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Infectious Disease Section, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
3
Microbiology and Virology Unit, Department of Pathology and Diagnostic, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
4
Microbiology and Virology Unit, AUSL Piacenza, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Senior authors: M. Perilli and G. Lo Cascio.
Members of LTCF-Veneto Working Group are listed in Acknowledgments.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(1), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010213
Submission received: 16 December 2021 / Revised: 4 January 2022 / Accepted: 12 January 2022 / Published: 16 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance)

Abstract

:
Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are important reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria which colonize patients transferred from the hospital, or they may emerge in the facility as a result of mutation or gene transfer. In the present study, we characterized, from a molecular point of view, 43 E. coli strains collected from residents of LTCFs in Northern Italy. The most common lineage found was ST131, followed by sporadic presence of ST12, ST69, ST48, ST95, ST410 and ST1193. All strains were incubators of several virulence factors, with iss, sat, iha and senB being found in 84%, 72%, 63% and 51% of E. coli, respectively. Thirty of the ST131 analyzed were of the O25b:H4 serotype and H30 subclone. The ST131 isolates were found to be mainly associated with IncF plasmids, CTX-M-1, CTX-M-3, CTX-M-15, CTX-M-27 and gyrA/parC/parE mutations. Metallo-β-lactamases were not found in ST131, whereas KPC-3 carbapenemase was found only in two ST131 and one ST1193. In conclusion, we confirmed the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes in E. coli ST131 isolated from colonized residents living inside LTCFs. The ST131 represents an incubator of fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and other antibiotic resistance genes in addition to different virulence factors.

1. Introduction

In the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) prior to December 2019, there were an estimated 2.9 million residents in 43,000 LTCFs, representing approximately 0.7% of the total population [1]. Reports from 2019 estimate that around 5.6% of the Italian population was potentially dependent, and 28.7% of them aged more than 65 in need of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) [1]. LTCFs are considered important reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria because of their colonization of residents discharged from the hospital, or they become colonized inside the facility as a result of antibiotic selective pressure [2,3,4]. The EU Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) supports point prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use in European LTCFs [5]. This program monitors the burden of HAIs and antimicrobial resistance inside LTCFs, comparing data from different countries and aiding in the implementation of multimodal interventions to reduce them. Infections of the urinary tract, lower respiratory tract and gastroenteric tract caused by Enterobacterales, in particular Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli, are the most frequent [6,7]; in particular, extra-intestinal pathogenic E. coli, resistant to numerous classes of antibiotics, is the leading cause of serious infections among LTCF residents, and the recent emergence and spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and/or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales firmly reduced the therapeutic options. The aim of the present study was to characterize the resistome and virulome of E. coli strains isolated from residents of LTCFs in Veneto, a Northern Italian region. The study was assessed using a next-generation sequencing platform.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Setting

Between July 2018 and June 2019 we conducted a point prevalence survey to assess both the frequency of healthcare-related infections and the enteric colonization status by multi-antibiotic-resistant (MDR) Gram negative bacteria in the population of elderly residents of 27 long-term care facilities (LTCF) in the Veneto Region. Joining the survey was voluntary, but at least one facility for each province of the region was enrolled. The 27 facilities were not involved simultaneously but at different times based on the local Ethic Committee’s approval, the willingness of local personnel to collaborate with researchers in the collection of the study-specific biological samples and the possibility of the reference microbiology laboratory to accept and process them. The survey was proposed to all patients who were hospitalized for at least 48 h and physically present in the facility at 8:00 a.m. of the survey day. Only patients who were able to provide written informed consent, or whose legal guardian consented, were enrolled. The survey was carried out in a single day for each facility. In the case of facilities with a high number of residents, the survey lasted several consecutive days, with the obligation to complete the evaluation of all subjects in each ward in a single day. For each enrolled patient, 118 variables were collected, including the type and etiology of concurrent infections and respective antibiotic therapy, any antibiotic treatments in the previous 3 months, hospital admissions and surgery in the previous 12 months and invasive medical devices in situ. For each enrolled host, a rectal swab was performed to assess the status of colonization by Gram negative MDR (Enterobacterales and non-fermenter Gram negatives producing ESBL and/or resistant to carbapenems).

2.2. Strains Selection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility

The strain selection was performed by inoculating the rectal swabs onto ChromID ESBL agar (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and on Mac Conkey agar. Identification of the isolates was carried out in an automated Vitek2 System (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed on a Vitek2 system (version 9.02, bioMérieux, Marcy lʹEtoile, France). The strains that showed resistance to carbapenems were also analyzed with an immunochromatographic lateral flow assay Carba5 (NG Biotech, Guipry, France). Resistance to antibiotics was interpreted according to the EUCAST criteria. The E. coli that showed susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems were excluded from the study.

2.3. DNA Extraction and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)

Total genomic DNA was extracted from 1 mL of an overnight bacterial culture using a MagMAX Microbiome Ultra Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (Applied Biosystems and ThermoFisher Scientific, Monza, Italy) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using the Illumina Miseq platform with a 2 × 300 paired-end run.

2.4. Bioinformatics Analysis

Quality control and sequences filtering were checked using DRAGEN FastQC + MultiQC v3.6.3 (https://basespace.illumina.com/apps/10562553/DRAGEN-FastQC-MultiQC, access date: 9 September 2021) and assembled with Velvet v1.2.10 (https://basespace.illumina.com/apps/8556549/Velvet-de-novo-Assembly, access date: 9 September 2021) [8]. Acquired antimicrobial resistance genes and chromosomal point mutations (gyrA, parC and parE genes) were identified using ResFinder 4.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/, access date: 13 September 2021) [9] and virulence genes using VirulenceFinder 2.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/VirulenceFinder/, access date: 13 September 2021). Serotypes and fimH types were determined using SerotypeFinder 2.0 and FimTyper 1.0 (http://genomicepidemiology.org/services/, access date: 14 September 2021) tools, respectively. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed using a BLAST-based approach [10]. The allele number of the seven housekeeping genes, adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA and recA, and the Sequence Type (ST) of each isolate was determined by combining seven allelic profiles in MLST E. coli Atchman database (https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_mlst_sqdef&page=schemeInfo&scheme_id=4, access date: 20 September 2021). PlasmidFinder 2.1 was used to detect the incompatibility groups of plasmids. Identified plasmids of the IncF, IncH1, IncH2, IncI1, IncN or IncA/C type were subtyped by pMLST 2.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/pMLST/, access date: 21 September 2021) [11].

3. Results

3.1. Strains Selection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Using a selective medium, 831 E. coli strains were isolated from 1981 residents of 27 LTCFs, and 43 strains collected from 13 LTCFs were randomly selected for WGS analysis. Overall, 100% of them were resistant to oxyimino-cephalosporins (cefotaxime and ceftazidime), 72% to ciprofloxacin and 21% to carbapenems (meropenem and/or imipenem), and 46% were also resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam association.

3.2. WGS, MLST and Serotype

E. coli strains were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing, which provides information about the sequence typing (MLST) of E. coli, serotypes, virulence genes, plasmid replicons, pMLST and antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs). The whole-genome size of the 43 E. coli ranged from 4.9 to 10 Mb. On the basis of the Achtman scheme, which considers adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA and recA housekeeping genes, the predominant ST found was ST131 (74% of isolates) followed by ST12 (5% isolates), ST69 (7% of isolates), ST48 (2% isolates), ST95 (2% isolates), ST410 (2% isolates) and ST1193 (7% isolates) (Table 1). The serotype of each E. coli was also determined. Thirty ST131 isolates showed a O25b:H4 serotype with the fimbria variant fimH30 and two O61:H4 serotypes with fimH94. The ST12 belonged to the O4:H5 serotype with fimH5 and fimH240, the ST48 belonged to the O137:H4 with fimH54, the ST69 belonged to O15:H18 with fimH27 and O44-O77:H18 with fimH27, the ST95 belonged to O18:H7 with fimH15, the ST410 belonged to H21 with fimH24 and the ST1193 belonged to O75:H5 with fimH64.

3.3. Virulence Genes

The virulence genes found in the E. coli isolates analyzed in this study were the following: sat (secreted autotransporter toxin), iha (adhesion-siderophore receptor), iss (increased serum survival), senB (plasmid encoded enterotoxin), gad (glutamate decarboxylase), astA (east-1 heat-stable toxin), lpfA (long polar fimbriae), air (enteroaggregative immunoglobulin repeat protein), eilA (Salmonella HilA homolog), cnf1 (cytotoxic necrotizing factor), vat (vacuolating autotransporter toxin), ireA (iron-regulated outer membrane virulence protein), iroN (salmchelin siderophore receptor), sfaS (S fimbriae), nfaE (non fimbrial adhesion) and mcmA, mchB, mchC and mchF, which are the microcin H47 system virulence genes (Table 2). The increased serum survival (iss), secreted autotransporter toxin (sat), adhesion-siderophore receptor (iha) and plasmid encoded enterotoxin (senB) were found in 84%, 72%, 63% and 51% of E. coli, respectively. As shown in Table 1, in the E. coli ST12, ST69 and ST95, different virulence genes were found; on the contrary, only two virulence genes were identified in ST410 and ST1193.

3.4. Plasmid Replicons and pMLST

The different incompatibility plasmids IncI1, IncFII(29), IncFII(pRSB107), IncFIB, IncFIA, IncN, IncF, IncB/O/K/Z, IncQ1, IncX1, IncX3, IncX4, Col(MG828), Col156, Col8282 and ColRNAI were detected in all E. coli analyzed (Table 3). Each E. coli isolate harbored more than one type of plasmid. Overall, IncFII was the predominant plasmid, found in 84% of E. coli, followed by Col (Col(MG828), Col156, Col8282) in 76%, IncFIA in 64%, IncFIB in 60%, ColRNAI in 40%, IncN in 28%, IncI1 in 24%, IncX (IncX4, IncX3 and IncX1) in 24% and IncB/O/K/Z in 12% of E. coli. The pMLST showed that IncF was represented by several lineages such as fii_2, fii_24, fii_29, fia_1, fib_1, fib_10, F1:A2:B20, F1:A20:B31, F29:B10, F31:A20:B1, F1:A2, F4:A19, F2:A1, F1:A1:B10 and F46:A6:B47, whereas IncN plasmid was represented by the ST7 lineage. In detail, the pMLST of ST131 isolates revealed the presence of F1:A2:B20 (ten isolates), F1:A20:B31 (three isolates), F29:B10 (one isolate), F31:A20:B1 (one isolate), F1:A2 (one isolate), F2:A1 (three isolates) and F1:A1:B10 (two isolates) (Table 3).

3.5. Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs)

The aminoglycoside resistance genes aadA1, aadA2, aadA5, aacA1, aacA4, aac(3)-IId, aph(3′)-XV, aph(3′)-Ia and aph(3′)-IIa and the bi-functional gene aac(6′)Ib-cr were found in all E. coli analyzed (Table 3). Fluoroquinolone resistance was plasmid-mediated by the presence of qnr elements. In particular, the qnrS1 was identified in ten E. coli, whereas qnrB19 and qnrB66 were found in two and one isolates, respectively. In one isolate of E. coli, the simultaneous presence of qnrS1 and qnrB19 was identified. The most common mechanism of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim resistance was represented by the acquisition of dihydrofolate reductase dfrA1(1 isolate), dfrA14 (8 isolates) and dfrA17 (19 isolates). Other antibiotic resistance genes were the following: mphA (macrolide resistance) detected in 23 E. coli, sul1/sul2 (suphonamide resistance) detected in 26 isolates, catB2/catB4 (chloramphenicol resistance) detected in 17 isolates, strA/strB (streptomycin resistance) detected in 17 isolates and tet(A)/tet(B) (tetracycline resistance) detected in 22 isolates. The lincosamide nucleotidyltransferase gene (lnu(F)) was found in one ST48 isolate. All E. coli strains produced one or more β-lactamases belonging to molecular classes A, B, C and D. Consistent with the results in this study, the ESBLs were the most widespread, and they included enzymes of the CTX-M-1 group (CTX-M-1, CTX-M-3 and CTX-M-15) in 21 isolates, CTX-M-27 (belonging to CTX-M-9 group) in 12 isolates and SHV-12 in 3 isolates (Table 4). The CTX-M enzymes were found only in ST131 strains. Overall, 37 out 43 E. coli (87%) were positive to ESBLs. The VIM-1 enzyme was found in three ST69, one ST12 and one ST95. The E. coli ST410 produced the metallo-β-lactamase NDM-4 and CMY-42 class C enzyme. The KPC-3 carbapenemase was identified in three isolates, specifically two ST131 and one ST1193. The OXA-1 and OXA-9 were found in 12 and 3 isolates, respectively, and in association with other β-lactamase genes (Table 4).

3.6. Chromosomal Fluoroquinolones Resistance

Resistance to fluoroquinolones was also mediated by mutations in gyrA, parC and parE. As shown in Table 3, the S83L/D87N in gyrA, S80I/E84V in parC and I529L in parE were the most common substitutions found in twenty-nine ST131. The S83L/D87N in gyrA, S80I in parC and L416F in parE mutations were found in three ST1193. The S83L/D87N in gyrA, S80I in parC and S458A in parE mutations were identified in one ST410. Two isolates of E. coli ST69 showed the S83L and D87N mutations in gyrA and S80I in parC.

4. Discussion

Herein, we used NGS-technology to investigate the resistome, virulome and genetic diversity of multi-drug resistant E. coli collected from 13 LTCFs in the Veneto region. The majority of E. coli analyzed belongs to the ST131 lineage. From a clinical point of view, ST131 is an extra-intestinal pathogenic bacterium which lives in the digestive tract, but it could also mediate its pathogenicity in the urinary tract and in the blood stream [12]. Almost all ST131 (30 out of 32) analyzed were of the O25b:H4 serotype and H30 subclone. The fimH allele, encoding for the virulence factor used by bacteria to attach the host tissue, has been used to phylogenetically classify the ST131 isolates in three clades (A, B, C), being also based on antibiotic resistance genes [13,14]. As reported by Pitout et al., ST131 clades C1 and C2 are fluoroquinolone resistant, and C2 has a strong association with CTX-M production [14]. Several studies have proven that the most prevalent subclonal lineage of E. coli ST131 is fimH30, which is also associated with a specific mutation in gyrA and parC, conferring chromosomal resistance to fluoroquinolones [15,16]. Some E. coli lineages were identified only in one LTCF; this is the case for ST12, ST69 and ST95, found only in SSL_BL, the ST48 in SAF_VE and ST410 in POCS_VR. The ST410 lineage seems to be phylogenetically older than ST131, but because of its virulence profile, ST131 is globally distributed in several environments over the world [17]. The feature of ST410 strains, in contrast to ST131, is the resistance to carbapenems [17]. In the present study, the ST410-H24 strain showed resistance to carbapenems, producing NDM-4 metallo-β-lactamase, and to fluoroquinolones via plasmid qnrS1 and to chromosomes by mutations in gyrA, parC and parE. The ST131 isolates were found to be associated with IncF plasmids, ESBLs (CTX-M-1-group, CTX-M-27) and chromosomal resistance to fluoroquinolone (gyrA/parC/parE mutations) [18]. They also possessed aac(6′)-Ib-cr, catB4, OXA-1/OXA-9 and other ARGs which reduced susceptibility to aminoglycoside, chloramphenicol, oxacillin and other classes of antibiotics. In ST131, we found the predominance of CTX-M variants (94% of isolates) followed by OXA-1/OXA-9 (47% of isolates). As previously reported, CTX-M-15 and CTX-M-27 alleles are associated with the ST131 clade C2 and ST131 clade C1 [19,20,21]. The CTX-M-27 is predominantly associated with the F1:A2:B20 replicon, as reported in other ST131 strains isolated worldwide [22]. The CTX-M-27 belongs to subgroup CTX-M-9, and it showed two amino acid substitutions from CTX-M-9 (A231V and D240G) and one from CTX-M-14 (D240G). CTX-M-27 was found, not only in clinical strains, but also in bacteria isolated from food-producing animals, livestock and environment [23,24,25]. Metallo-β-lactamases were not found in ST131, and this is in agreement with results reported in different countries [13]. Similarly, the KPC-3 carbapenemase was found only in three E. coli strains (ST131 and ST1193) collected in CDS_RO, IPABRT_VI and PCS_VR LTCFs. In a previous paper where we characterized the resistome of K. pneumoniae isolates, we found, in the same LTCFs, KPC-3 producing K. pneumoniae [26]. The E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains harbored the same IncFIB(pQil) plasmid. We speculate that, in the same LTCF, a transfer of the blaKPC-3 gene, presumably located in IncFIB(pQil) plasmid, may have occurred between E. coli and K. pneumoniae.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we confirmed the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases in E. coli isolated from colonized residents living inside LTCFs. In particular, the CTX-M-enzymes belonging to sub-groups 1 and 9 represent the ESBLs mainly found in our strains. In the past decade, the CTX-M-enzymes have been increasingly detected in E. coli worldwide. A low percentage of carbapenemases, including KPC-, VIM- and NDM-variants, was identified in E. coli collected in the LTCFs included in this survey. The ST131 represents an incubator of fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and other antibiotic resistance genes and, in addition, different virulence factors. ST131 is composed by five clades (A, B, C0, C1 and C2), and clade C seems to be more fit than the others. The clade C showed resistance to fluoroquinolones and was able to acquire IncF plasmids, giving to E. coli a rapid and continual adaptation to different environments. Emerging evidence worldwide suggests that LTCFs are important reservoirs for ARGs’ dissemination. The presence of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in LTCFs has serious consequences not only for residents but also for the LTCF as an organization, both in terms of internal strategies to contain and possibly reduce these pathogens and the acceptance of colonized patients from the hospital.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P. and M.P.; methodology, A.M.A., A.P., S.C., L.M., A.B. and L.N.; investigation, A.P., S.C. and A.M.A.; data curation, M.P., G.L.C. and A.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. and A.M.A.; writing—review and editing, M.P., A.P., G.L.C. and A.M.A.; visualization, E.T.; supervision, M.P., G.A. and E.T.; project administration, A.P., G.L.C. and A.M.A.; funding acquisition, A.M.A., G.A. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Regione Veneto, DGR 1656; 17/10/2017 and University of L’Aquila internal funds (07_PROGETTO_RICERCA_ATENEO).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Giuseppe Cornaglia for having strongly supported this study with his scientific enthusiasm. Thanks to the LTCF Veneto working group, composed of Giorgia Be, Nicola Salerno, Lorenza Lambertenghi and Ilaria Coledan (Infectious Disease Section, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy) for the collection of biological samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of COVID-19 in Long-Term Care Facilities in the EU/EEA; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2021.
  2. Moro, M.L.; Gagliotti, C. Antimicrobial resistance and stewardship in long-term care facilities. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 1011–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Strausbaugh, L.J.; Joseph, C.L. The burden of infection in long-term care. Infect Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2000, 21, 674–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Giufrè, M.; Ricchizzi, E.; Accogli, M.; Barbanti, F.; Monaco, M.; Pimentel de Araujo, F.; Farina, C.; Fazii, P.; Mattei, R.; Sarti, M.; et al. Colonization by multidrug-resistant organisms in long-term care facilities in Italy: A point-prevalence study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Protocol for Validation of Point Prevalence Surveys of Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use in European Long-Term Care Facilities—2016–2017 Version 1.1; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2016.
  6. Rosello, A.; Hayward, A.C.; Hopkins, S.; Horner, C.; Ironmonger, D.; Hawkey, P.M.; Deeny, S.R. Impact of long-term care facility residence on the antibiotic resistance of urinary tract Escherichia coli and Klebsiella. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 1184–1192. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Falcone, M.; Paul, M.; Yahav, D.; Orlando, G.; Tiseo, G.; Prendki, V.; Güerri-Fernández, R.; Gavazzi, G.; Mutters, N.T.; Cookson, B.; et al. Antimicrobial consumption and impact of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in long-term care facilities. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zerbino, D.R. Using the Velvet de novo assembler for short-read sequencing technologies. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2010, 11, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zankari, E.; Hasman, H.; Cosentino, S.; Vestergaard, M.; Rasmussen, S.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Larsen, M.V. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 2640–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Larsen, M.V.; Cosentino, S.; Rasmussen, S.; Friis, C.; Hasman, H.; Marvig, R.L.; Jelsbak, L.; Sicheritz-Pontén, T.; Ussery, D.W.; Aarestrup, F.M.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Carattoli, A.; Zankari, E.; García-Fernández, A.; Voldby Larsen, M.; Lund, O.; Villa, L.; Møller Aarestrup, F.; Hasman, H. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Manges, A.R.; Geum, H.M.; Guo, A.; Edens, T.J.; Fibke, C.D.; Pitout, J.D.D. Global Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) lineages. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00135-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nicolas-Chanoine, M.H.; Bertrand, X.; Madec, J.Y. Escherichia coli ST131, an intriguing clonal group. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 543–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Pitout, J.D.D.; Finn, T.J. The evolutionary puzzle of Escherichia coli ST131. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 81, 104265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Johnson, J.R.; Porter, S.B.; Zhanel, G.; Kuskowski, M.A.; Denamur, E. Virulence of Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a murine sepsis model in relation to sequence type ST131 status, fluoroquinolone resistance, and virulence genotype. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 1554–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Petty, N.K.; Ben Zakour, N.L.; Stanton-Cook, M.; Skippington, E.; Totsika, M.; Forde, B.M.; Phan, M.D.; Moriel, D.G.; Peters, K.M.; Davies, M. Global dissemination of a multidrug resistant Escherichia coli clone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5694–5699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Roer, L.; Overballe-Petersen, S.; Hansen, F.; Schønning, K.; Wang, M.; Røder, B.L.; Hansen, D.S.; Justesen, U.S.; Andersen, L.P.; Fulgsang-Damgaard, D.; et al. Escherichia coli sequence type 410 is causing new international high-risk clones. mSphere 2018, 3, e00337-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Matsumura, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Nagao, M.; Ito, Y.; Takakura, S.; Ichiyama, S. Association of fluoroquinolone resistance, virulence genes, and IncF plasmids with extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli sequence type 131 (ST131) and ST405 clonal groups. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 4736–4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Matsumura, Y.; Johnson, J.R.; Yamamoto, M.; Nagao, M.; Tanaka, M.; Takakura, S.; Ichiyama, S. CTX-M-27- and CTX-M-14-producing, ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli of the H30 subclonal group within ST131 drive a Japanese regional ESBL epidemic. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 1639–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Matsumura, Y.; Pitout, J.D.D.; Gomi, R.; Matsuda, T.; Noguchi, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Peirano, G.; Devinney, R.; Bradford, P.A.; Motyl, M.R.; et al. Global Escherichia coli sequence type 131 clade with blaCTX-M-27 gene. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 1900–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Seiffert, S.N.; Hilty, M.; Kronenberg, A.; Droz, S.; Perreten, V.; Endimiani, A. Extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in community, specialized outpatient clinic and hospital settings in Switzerland. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 2249–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Matsuo, N.; Nonogaki, R.; Hayashi, M.; Wachino, J.I.; Suzuki, M.; Arakawa, Y.; Kawamura, K. Characterization of bla(CTX-M-27)/F1:A2:B20 plasmids harbored by Escherichia coli Sequence Type 131 Sublineage C1/H30R isolates spreading among elderly Japanese in nonacute-care settings. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00202-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, W.H.; Lin, X.Y.; Xu, L.; Gu, X.X.; Yang, L.; Li, W.; Ren, S.Q.; Liu, Y.H.; Zeng, Z.L.; Jiang, H.X. CTX-M-27 producing Salmonella enterica Serotypes typhimurium and indiana are prevalent among food-producing animals in China. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kawamura, K.; Sugawara, T.; Matsuo, N.; Hayashi, K.; Norizuki, C.; Tamai, K.; Kondo, T.; Arakawa, Y. Spread of CTX-type extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates of epidemic clone B2-O25-ST131 among dogs and cats in Japan. Microb. Drug Resist. 2017, 23, 1059–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Piccirilli, A.; Pompilio, A.; Rossi, L.; Segatore, B.; Amicosante, G.; Rosatelli, G.; Perilli, M.; Di Bonaventura, G. Identification of CTX-M-15 and CTX-M-27 in antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria isolated from three rivers running in Central Italy. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Piccirilli, A.; Cherubini, S.; Azzini, A.M.; Tacconelli, E.; Lo Cascio, G.; Maccacaro, L.; Bazaj, A.; Naso, L.; Amicosante, G.; LTCF-Veneto Working Group; et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) of carbapenem resistant K. pneumoniae isolated in Long-Term Care Facilities in the Northern Italian Region. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Genome analysis of E. coli isolated from residents of 13 LTCFs (Northern Italian Region).
Table 1. Genome analysis of E. coli isolated from residents of 13 LTCFs (Northern Italian Region).
LTCFs CodeNo. IsolatesGenome Size (bp)MLST *SerotypefimHVirluence Genes
SSL_BL25.360.264ST69O15:H1827gad, air, lpfA, eilA, iss, iha, sat, senB
15.064.257ST131O25b:H430sat, iss, iha, gad
35.318.811ST131O25b:H430sat, iss, cnf1, senB
15.428.542ST69O17/O44-O77:H1827eilA, gad, lpfA, sat, air, senB, iss, iha
15.506.897ST131O25b:H430senB, iss, sat, iha, cnf1
15.102.820ST131O25b:H430sat, iss, iha, gad
15.257.199ST95O18:H715mchC, senB, vat, ireA, iroN, iss, sfaS, gad, mchF
15.278.074ST12O4:H5204cnf1, iroN, mcmA, mchF, mchC, mchB, vat, iss, gad
15.110.437ST12O4:H55cnf1, iroN, mcmA, mchF, mchC, mchB, vat, ireA
ISRAA_TV15.117.808ST131O25b:H430senB, iss, sat, iha
SAF_VE15.003.689ST48O137:H454mchF, gad, cma, iss, iroN
CRMC_VE15.143.042ST131O25b:H430iha, senB, sat, iss
15.126.057ST131O25b:H430sat, gad, iha, senB, iss
CDS_RO210.087.318ST131O61:H494astA, iss, iha, sat
15.158.809ST1193O75:H564sat, iha
15.151.322ST131O25b:H430iha, sat, iss
IPABMC_VI15.362.937ST131O25b:H430sat, senB, astA, iha, iss
25.045.886ST131O25b:H430astA, gad, iha, senB, iss
15.277.401ST131O25b:H430senB, iha, sat, astA, iss
IPABRS_VI25.238.706ST131O25b:H430gad, iha, sat, astA, iss
25.131.308ST1193O75:H564vat
IPABRT_VI24.999.937ST131O25b:H430sat, iss, senB
25.120.568ST131O25b:H430sat, iss, senB, iha, gad
14.865.293ST131O25b:H430iss, senB, iha
15.080.670ST131O25b:H430iss, cnf1
IPABSC_VI25.165.353ST131O25b:H430sat, iss, senB, iha
15.052.997ST131O25b:H430sat, iss, senB, iha
POBB_VR15.254.036ST131O25b:H430sat, iss, senB, iha, nfaE
POVI_VR15.353.306ST131O25b:H430iss, iha, sat, cnf1
POSC_VR23.813.125ST131O25b:H430gad, iss, cnf1, iha
POCS_VR14.907.147ST410H2124gad, lpfA
15.230.571ST131O25b:H430sat, iha, iss
For legal reasons, we used only the acronym of the 12 LTCFs. * MLST: Multilocus sequence typing.
Table 2. Distribution of virulence genes in different E. coli.
Table 2. Distribution of virulence genes in different E. coli.
Virulence GeneTarget ClassTotal No. 43/(%)
airEnteroaggregative immunoglobulin repeat protein2 (5%)
astAEast-1 heat stable toxin7 (16%)
cmaColicin M2 (5%)
cnf1Cytotoxic necrotizing factor9 (21%)
eilASalmonella HilA homolog3 (7%)
gadGlutamate decarboxylase10 (23%)
ihaAdhesion-siderophore receptor27 (63%)
ireAIron-regulated outer membrane virulence protein3 (7%)
iroNSalmochelin siderophore receptor7 (16%)
issIncreased serum survival36 (84%)
lpfALong polar fimbriae5 (12%)
mchBMicrocin H47 system3 (7%)
mchCMicrocin H47 system5 (12%)
mchFMicrocin H47 system7 (16%)
mcmAMicrocin H47 system3 (7%)
nfaEnon-fimbrial adhesion2 (5%)
satSecreted autotransporter toxin31 (72%)
senBPlasmid encoded enterotoxin22 (51%)
sfaSS fimbriae2 (5%)
vatVacuolating autotransporter toxin7 (16%)
Table 3. Resistome pattern of E. coli isolates from LTCFs in Northern Italian region.
Table 3. Resistome pattern of E. coli isolates from LTCFs in Northern Italian region.
LTCFs CodeNo. IsolatesPlasmid Replicons/pMLSTΒ-Lactam Resistant GenesOther Antibiotics Resistant GenesChromosomal Point Mutation
SSL_BL2IncX4, IncI1, IncFII(29), IncN, IncFIB(AP001918), Col156
/IncF: fii_29, fib_10
IncN: ST7
blaVIM-1aacA4, aadA1, mph(A), sul1, dfrA14, qnrS1, aac(6′)Ib-cr, catB2gyrA D87N
parC S80I
1Col(MG828),Col156, IncFII(pRSB107), IncFIA, IncN
/IncF: F1:A2:B20
blaCTX-M-3aadA5, sul1, dfrA17gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
3IncFII, Col156, IncFIB(AP001918), IncFIA
/F1:A20:B31
blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1aac(6′)Ib-cr, aadA5, aac(3)-IIa, mph(A), sul1, dfrA17, tet(A), catB4gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
1Col156, Col8282, IncI1, ColRNAI, IncB/O/K/Z, IncFIB(AP001918), IncFII(29), IncN
/IncF: F29:B10
IncI1: arda_4, pill_6, repi1_1, sogs_3, trba_6
IncN: ST7
blaVIM-1, blaTEM-1Baph(3′)-XV, aac(6′)Ib-cr, strA, strB, aacA4, aadA5, aadA1, mph(A), sul1, sul2, dfrA17, qnrS1, catB2gyrA S83L
1IncFII, Col156, IncB/O/K/Z, IncFIB(AP001918), IncFIA
/F31:A20:B1
blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1aac(6′)Ib-cr, aac(3)-IIa, catB4gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
1IncFII(pRSB107), Col(MG828), ColRNAI, IncFIA
/F1:A2
blaCTX-M-27strA, strB, sul2, tet(A), aadA5, mph(A), sul1, dfrA17gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
1ColRNAI, IncFII(pCoo), IncN, Col156
/IncF: F29:B10
IncN: ST7
blaVIM-1aac(6′)Ib-cr, aacA4, aacA1, mph(A), sul1, dfrA14, qnrS1, catB2None
1IncFIB(AP001918), IncI1, IncQ1, InFIIblaTEM-1B, blaCTX-M-1aadA1, strA, strB, sul1, sul2, dfrA1, qnrS1, tet(A)None
1IncFIA(HI1), IncFII, IncN
/IncF: F4:A19
IncN: ST7
blaVIM-1aac(6′)Ib-cr, aadA1, aph(3′)-XV, aacA4, mph(A), sul1, dfrA14, qnrS1, catB2None
ISRAA_TV1IncFII (pRSB107), IncB/O/K/Z, IncFIA, IncFIB (AP001918), Col(MG828), Col156
/F1:A2:B20
blaCTX-M-27strA, strB, sul2, tet(A)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
SAF_VE1IncFII, IncI1, IncX1, IncFIB(AP001918)
/IncF: fib_1, fii_24
blaSHV-12, blaTEM-1BstrA, strB, aadA2,
aph(3′)-Ia, lnu(F), qnrB19, qnrS1, tet(B)
None
CRMC_VE1IncFII(pRSB107), Col156, IncX4, IncFIA, IncFIB (AP001918), Col(MG828)
/F1:A2:B20
blaCTX-M-27 gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
1IncFII(pRSB107),Col156, IncX4, IncFIA, IncFIB (AP001918)
/F1:A2:B20
blaCTX-M-27 gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
CDS_RO2Col(MG828), IncX4, IncI1, Col8282,IncFIA,IncFII(pRSB107), IncN, ColRNAI, Col(KPHS6), p0111, Col156 /IncF: F2:A1
IncI1: ST57
blaTEM-1B, blaCTX-M-3, blaOXA-1aph(3′)-IIa, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, catB4None
1Col156, Col(MG828), IncFIA, IncFII
/F2:A1
blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1aac(6′)-Ib-cr, catB4gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
1IncFIB(pQil),Col(BS512), IncFIA, IncFIB(AP001918)
/IncF: A1:B10
blaTEM-1A, blaKPC-3, blaOXA-9aac(3)-IIdgyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I
parE L416F
IPABMC_VI1Col(MG828), IncX4, IncFII(29), Col156, ColRNAI, IncFIB(AP001918) /F29:B10blaTEM-1B, blaCTX-M-15aac(3)-Id, strA, strB, aadA5, mph(A), sul1, sul2, dfrA17, tet(A)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
2IncFII(29), IncFIB(AP001918), Col8282, ColRNAI, Col156
/F29:B10
blaCTX-M-15,
blaTEM-1B
strA, aac(3)-IId, strB, aadA5, mph(A), sul2, sul1, dfrA17,tet(A)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
1IncFII(29), IncFIB(AP001918), Col156, ColRNAI, Col8282
/IncF: F29:B10
blaTEM-1B, blaCTX-M-15, blaVIM-1aph(3′)-XV, aacA4, aadA1, aac(3)-IId, strA, strB, mph(A), sul1, sul2, aac(6′)Ib-cr, dfrA14, dfrA17, qnrS1, tet(A), catB2gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
IPABRS_VI2IncFII, IncFIA, Col(MG828)
/F2:A1
blaCTX-M-15,
blaTEM-1B
gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
2IncFIA, Col (MG828), IncFIB (AP001918), Col156
/F1:A1:B10
blaTEM-1A,
blaSHV-12
mph(A), sul2, sul1, dfrA17, qnrB19, tet(A)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I
parE L416F
IPABRT_VI2IncFII(AP001918), IncFII(pRSB107), Col8282, IncFIA, Col156, Col(MG828)
/F1:A2:B20
blaCTX-M-27strB, aadA5, strA, sul1, sul2, dfrA17, tet(A)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
2IncFII(AP001918), IncFII(pRSB107), Col8282, IncFIA, Col156, Col(MG828)
/F1:A2:B20
blaCTX-M-27strA, aadA5, strB, mph(A), sul1, sul2, dfrA17, tet(A)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
1IncFII(pRSB107), Col156, IncFIB(AP001918), IncFIB(pQil), IncFIA
/IncF: F1:A2:B20
blaTEM-1A, blaOXA-1, blaKPC-3, blaOXA-9, blaCTX-M-27aac(3)-IIa, aac(6′)Ib-cr, dfrA14, qnrB66, catB4gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
1IncFIA,IncFIB(AP001918), IncFII, ColRNAI
/F31:A20:B1
blaCTX-M-15,blaOXA-1catB4gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
IPABSC_VI2IncFIB(AP001918), IncFII(pRSB107), Col8282, IncFIA, ColRNAI, Col156, IncI1
/F1:A2:B20
blaCTX-M-27strB, aadA5, strA, mph(A), sul1, sul2, dfrA17, tet(A)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
1IncFIB(AP001918), IncFII(pRSB107), IncFIA, Col156
/F1:A2:B20
blaCTX-M-27strB, aadA5, strA, mph(A), sul1, sul2, dfrA17, tet(A)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
POBB_VR1IncFIA, IncFIB(AP001918), IncFII(pRSB107), Col8282, IncN, Col156, ColRNAI
/F1:A2:B20
IncN: ST7
blaCTX-M-15,
blaTEM-1B
aac(3)-IId, strA, strB, aadA5, mph(A), sul1, sul2, dfrA17, dfrA14, qnrS1, tet(A)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
POVI_VR1IncFIA, IncFIB(AP001918), IncFII, ColRNAI
/F31:A20:B1
blaCTX-M-15,blaOXA-1aac(3)-IIa, aac(6′)Ib-cr, tet(A), catB4gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
POSC_VR2IncFIB(AP001918), ColRNAI, IncI1, IncFII, IncFIA
/F36:A20:B1
blaCTX-M-15,blaOXA-1aac(3)-IIa, aac(6′)Ib-cr, tet(A), catB4gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
POCS_VR1IncX3, ColRNAI, IncFIB(pB171), IncI1, IncP1, FIA (pBK30683), IncFIC(FII)
/F46:A6:B47
blaCMY-42, blaNDM-4tet(B)gyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I
parE S458A
1IncFII(29), IncFIB(AP001918), ColRNAI, IncFIB(pQil)
/IncF: F29:B10
blaCTX-M-15,blaOXA-9,blaTEM-1A,blaKPC-3,
blaOXA-1
aac(6′)-Ib-crgyrA S83L/D87N
parC S80I/E84V
parE I529L
Table 4. Distribution of β-lactamase genes among E. coli strains.
Table 4. Distribution of β-lactamase genes among E. coli strains.
E. coliST12ST48ST69ST95ST131ST410ST1193
Total No.21313213
blaTEM-1111-9-3
blaCTX-M-11------
blaCTX-M-3----3--
blaCTX-M-15----17--
blaCTX-M-27----12--
blaSHV-12-1----2
blaKPC-3----2-1
blaNDM-4-----1-
blaVIM-11-31---
blaCMY-42-----1-
blaOXA-1----13--
blaOXA-9----2-1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cherubini, S.; Perilli, M.; Azzini, A.M.; Tacconelli, E.; Maccacaro, L.; Bazaj, A.; Naso, L.; Amicosante, G.; LTCF-Veneto Working Group; Lo Cascio, G.; et al. Resistome and Virulome of Multi-Drug Resistant E. coli ST131 Isolated from Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities in the Northern Italian Region. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010213

AMA Style

Cherubini S, Perilli M, Azzini AM, Tacconelli E, Maccacaro L, Bazaj A, Naso L, Amicosante G, LTCF-Veneto Working Group, Lo Cascio G, et al. Resistome and Virulome of Multi-Drug Resistant E. coli ST131 Isolated from Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities in the Northern Italian Region. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(1):213. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cherubini, Sabrina, Mariagrazia Perilli, Anna Maria Azzini, Evelina Tacconelli, Laura Maccacaro, Alda Bazaj, Laura Naso, Gianfranco Amicosante, LTCF-Veneto Working Group, Giuliana Lo Cascio, and et al. 2022. "Resistome and Virulome of Multi-Drug Resistant E. coli ST131 Isolated from Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities in the Northern Italian Region" Diagnostics 12, no. 1: 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop