Next Article in Journal
Supplementation of Probiotic Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum Mediates Anticancer Effect on Bladder Urothelial Cells by Regulating Butyrate-Responsive Molecular Signatures
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Analysis of Conventional Machine Learning Algorithms for Identification of Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Algorithm for Individual Dosage in Cadmium–Zinc–Telluride SPECT-Gated Radionuclide Angiography

Diagnostics 2021, 11(12), 2268; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122268
by Maria Normand Hansen 1,*, Christian Haarmark 1,2, Bent Kristensen 1 and Bo Zerahn 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2021, 11(12), 2268; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122268
Submission received: 14 October 2021 / Revised: 29 November 2021 / Accepted: 2 December 2021 / Published: 4 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Medical Image Analysis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I would like to know if the authors  compared the LVEF by ERNA with the LVEF by ECHO , and which was the correlation in LVEF by ERNA and ECHO  between those 4,9% pts  with disagreement  in LVEF who had  a CR of 1.7 kps.

Also how is scan time affectedfrom the reduced patient doses?

Dolomger time affect patient comfort?

In how many cases a third analyzer was needed?

Was it common for the LVEF to vary more than 2% points between the two technologists?

How target count rate was related with the accuracy of the analysis between the technologists?

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a well written manuscript. There is only one suggestion, to use receiver operating chracteristics for diagnositic accuracy. There rest are minor typo and english check. 

Back to TopTop