Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 Assessment with Bedside Lung Ultrasound in a Population of Intensive Care Patients Treated with Mechanical Ventilation and ECMO
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Physical Activity on Cognitive Functions: A New Field for Research and Management of Cystic Fibrosis
Previous Article in Journal
Partial Pancreatic Parenchymal Atrophy Is a New Specific Finding to Diagnose Small Pancreatic Cancer (≤10 mm) Including Carcinoma in Situ: Comparison with Localized Benign Main Pancreatic Duct Stenosis Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Salivary Cytokines and Airways Disease Severity in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical and Genotypical Features of False-Negative Patients in 26 Years of Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening in Tuscany, Italy

1
Tuscany Reference Cystic Fibrosis Center, Meyer Children’s Hospital, Viale Pieraccini 24, 50139 Florence, Italy
2
Tuscany Support Cystic Fibrosis Service, Department of Pediatric, Leghorn Hospital, Viale Vittorio Alfieri 36, 57124 Leghorn, Italy
3
Diagnostic Genetics Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Piero Palagi 1, 50139 Florence, Italy
4
Department of Pediatric, Santa Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy
5
Department of Pediatric, Meyer Children’s Hospital, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 24, 50139 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2020, 10(7), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070446
Submission received: 11 May 2020 / Revised: 24 June 2020 / Accepted: 28 June 2020 / Published: 1 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Cystic Fibrosis)

Abstract

:
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening and common genetic disorder. Cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CF NBS) has been implemented in many countries over the last 30 years, becoming a widely accepted public health strategy in economically developed countries. False-negative (FN) cases can occur after CF NBS, with the number depending on the method. We evaluated the delayed diagnosis of CF, identifying the patients who had false-negative CF NBS results over 26 years (1992–2018) in Tuscany, Italy. The introduction of DNA analysis to the newborn screening protocol improved the sensitivity of the test and reduced the FNs. Our experience showed that, overall, at least 8.7% of cases of CF received FNs (18 cases) and were diagnosed later, with an average age of 6.6 years (range: 4 months to 22 years). Respiratory symptoms and salt-loss syndrome (metabolic hypochloremic alkalosis) are suggestive symptoms of CF and were commons events in FN patients. In Tuscany, a region with a high CFTR allelic heterogeneity, the salt-loss syndrome was a common event in FNs. Therefore, we provided evidence to support the claim that the FN patients had CFTR mutations rarer compared with the true-positive cases. We underline the importance of vigilance toward clinical manifestations suggestive of CF on the part of the primary care providers and hospital physicians in a region with an efficient newborn screening program.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting autosomal recessive disorder that affects about 1 in 2500–4000 babies in the Caucasian population [1]. The classical CF phenotype is characterized by lung disease (bronchiectasis with persistent airway-based infection and inflammation) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency associated with nutrient malabsorption, contributing to impaired growth and undernutrition [2]. CF is due to mutations in the gene encoding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) anion channel [3]. The most common CFTR mutation associated with cystic fibrosis is Phe508del (c.1521_1523delCTT, DF508) [4]. Although the pancreatic status is closely related to the CFTR genotype [5], there is a wide clinical heterogeneity in CF patients, even between those carrying the same CFTR genotype or between siblings with CF [6].
The survival of individuals with CF has increased over the last 30 years, with a current predicted median age of survival of 43 years [7]. This is due to many factors, including earlier diagnosis through cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CF NBS) [8]. NBS strategies have been implemented since the early 1970s, and CF NBS is currently a widely accepted public health strategy in economically developed countries. All CF NBS strategies that are currently performed in NBS programs start with immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) on blood spots, usually in combination with a second IRT test (IRT2), pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) on blood, or CFTR mutation analysis (DNA) [8]. A pancreatic meconium lactase assay (LACT) is an additional strategy in CF NBS programs that is used in some regions after the first immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT1) dosage [9]. The European Cystic Fibrosis Society established that NBS programs should aim for a minimum sensitivity of 95% [10]. Individuals identified by NBS can be diagnosed with CF by a sweat chloride value ≥60 mmol/L and/or by the identification of two CF-causing mutations in trans [11]. Because CF NBS is widespread, most CF diagnoses presently occur in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic babies following a positive NBS result [12,13,14], and this unequivocally benefits short- and long-term outcomes [15]. The presence of NBS may lead to an erroneous reassurance that all CF cases are identified at birth [16]. Maclean et al. showed that access to CF NBS seems not to result in a delay in diagnosis or poorer outcomes in those children for whom CF was not detected by CF NBS [17], but the question is debated [18,19]. Estimating the annual number of false negatives (FNs) in the CF NBS program is a complex challenge that depends on the sensitivity of the NBS method. It is essential for NBS laboratories and CF referral centers to have feedback on new CF cases not diagnosed by screening that allows the quality of the NBS program to be evaluated. Fritz et al. estimated that there were 70 FNs in 4,038,560 screened newborns per year in the USA using either the IRT/DNA or IRT/IRT strategy [19]. Rock et al. described the many possible causes of FN results that can occur after newborn screening for CF [20]. Farrel et al. declared that every physician’s first duty is to diagnose CF accurately and promptly because the “diagnosis is the first step of treatment” [21]. To limit irreversible organ pathology, a timely diagnosis of CF for a precocious institution of CF therapies can greatly benefit these FN patients. Several case reports of delayed diagnosis after a false-negative CF NBS have been described in the current literature [20,22,23,24]. The study of Padoan et al. analyzed 15 FN patients of the same CF center in Lombardy, a region in the northwest of Italy [25]. Calvin et al. reviewed 30 years of CF NBS in East Anglia, England, and evaluated 29 FN patients, including 10 FN patients with meconium ileus [26].
In Tuscany, a region in central Italy consisting of 3.7 million inhabitants, CF NBS has been carried out from 1984 in the CF Center of Florence [27,28]. In our center, all patients, who were residents of Tuscany, were also referred for the sweat test if they had symptoms suggestive of CF. We retrospectively evaluated CF patients who were born in Tuscany in the 1992–2018 period and who had negative results in CF NBS but who were later diagnosed because they had symptoms suggestive of CF. The aim of the study was to investigate FNs through the following characteristics: the symptoms and signs suggesting CF, the age of diagnosis, the current pancreatic status, the genotypical features, and the results of sweat tests.

2. Materials and Methods

From 1992 to 2018, we retrospectively reviewed all the results from the CF NBS database of the Regional Referral CF Center in Florence. The previous data were not analyzed in this study because the CF NBS protocol before 1992 was performed using a test with low sensitivity (<85%). Since 1992, the NBS has been performed by an immunoreactive trypsin (IRT) assay on dried blood spots, which is followed, if positive, by IRT retesting (IRT2) and meconium lactase dosage (protocol IRT1/IRT2 + LACT).
The cutoff of IRT1 was set at the 99th percentile, changing every 4–6 months according to NBS results and on the basis of seasons, as described in literature [29,30]. In 1992–1993, we used a colorimetric method for dried blood spot analysis of IRT1 (Medical System, IRT1 99th: 55 ng/mL). Successively, fluorimetric methods were used for IRT1 analysis (Delfia in 1994–2005, IRT1 99th percentile range: 54–62 ng/mL; Auto-Delfia in 2006–2013, IRT1 99th percentile range: 57–63 ng/mL). Since 2014, the IRT1 analysis has been performed by using the GSP instrument (Perkin Elmer), with an IRT1 99th percentile range of 49–50 ng/mL. Meconium lactase was detected by glucose production after incubation of meconium with lactose (cutoff 0.5 U/g), as described from Pederzini et al. [9]. The IRT2, taken at 3 or 4 weeks of age, followed the same procedure as the initial IRT1 assay (1992–2013 cutoff 29 ng/mL; 2014–2018 cutoff 23 ng/mL).
Since 2011, the NBS algorithm has been integrated with DNA analysis (protocol IRT1/IRT2 + LACT + IRT1/DNA); the overall Tuscany CF NBS strategy is illustrated in Figure 1 [31]. The detection rate of CFTR panel mutations through NBS was 80% until 2015 (38 CF-causing mutations were screened), 88% from 2016 to May 2018 (66 CF-causing mutations were screened), and 90% from May to December 2018 (272 CF-causing mutations were screened). In the database, we evaluated the total number of newborns screened, the true positives, the false positives, the true negatives, and the CF newborns with meconium ileus. In true-positive cases, all the patients with cystic fibrosis screening positive inconclusive diagnoses (CFSPIDs) who had developed CF during the follow-up (until 31 December 2019) were included [31,32].
Subsequently, with an extensive review of our clinical chart, we isolated the CF patients born in Tuscany over these 26 years but with negative screening (FNs) and a CF diagnosis preceding 31 December 2019. CF was first clinically suspected, following which a sweat test was performed according to the consensus statement [11]. The sweat chloride levels were tested according to the guidelines provided by the classic Gibson and Cook method [27] in the single laboratory of the Florence CF Center. The signs and symptoms of FN patients that prompted the physician or pediatrician (in primary care or in hospital care) to suspect CF were extensively examined from clinical charts. We also retrospectively assessed the age at diagnosis (in years) of the FN patients and the values of sweat chloride. The clinical symptoms revealed in our databases have been divided into these 10 categories:
  • Respiratory (bronchopulmonary infections, chronic cough, expectoration)
  • Gastroenteric (irregular defecation, frequent episodes of diarrhea)
  • Failure to thrive (not meeting standards of growth)
  • Salt-loss syndrome (dehydration with metabolic hypochloremic alkalosis)
  • Nasal polyposis
  • Pancreatitis
  • Liver disease
  • Diabetes
  • Distal bowel obstruction syndrome (DIOS)
  • Azoospermia
Pancreatic sufficiency (PS) was defined based on at least two values of fecal pancreatic elastase being higher than 200 μg/g, measured independently of acute gastrointestinal diseases [33].
A genotype assessment was performed in all CF patients. We carried out gene sequencing (98% detection rate) in all CF patients, where one mutation was found after a first-level analysis of NBS. In all cases, an informed consent form was signed.
We analyzed the CFTR mutation alleles of FN patients and compared these with the CFTR alleles of true-positive patients. We compared the results with statistical analysis (chi-squared analysis with Yates correction) of the prevalence of the same mutations, which were more frequent in Tuscany for the true-positive cases than the FN cases. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

In Tuscany, 746,686 newborns were screened in the 1992–2018 period. Throughout the 26-year period, both NBS protocols and diagnostic devices changed over time. In 2011, the IRT1/IRT2 + LACT algorithm was integrated with the analysis of mutations of the CFTR gene (IRT1/DNA), as reported in Figure 1. The sensitivity changed from 87.50% (1992–2010) to 96.15% (2011–2018). The CF incidence in the region over these 26 years was 1:3696 (1:3600 in the 1992–2010 period and 1:3939 in the 2011–2018 period). This showed that 202 patients had CF, of whom 162 (80.2%) were true-positive cases, 18 (8.9%) were FN cases, and 22 (10.9%) had meconium ileus. The CF newborns with meconium ileus had positive CF NBS results in 16/22 cases and FN results in 6/22. Patients with meconium ileus were excluded from the FN group and considered separately. The complete results of CF NBS are reported in Table 1. The average age at diagnosis of 18 FN patients was 6.6 years (range: 4 months to 22 years; median: 0.9 years). The symptoms at diagnosis were respiratory infections (8/18, 44.4%), salt-loss syndrome (7/18, 38.8%), failure to thrive (6/18, 33.3%), diarrhea (4/18, 22.2%), and nasal polyposis (3/18, 16.6%). Data on the symptoms leading to CF diagnosis, IRT values, pancreatic status, sweat chloride values, and genotypes are reported in Table 2. All FN patients had an IRT1 below the 99th percentile cutoff. Of the true-positive cases, 73.4% (119/160) had pancreatic deficiency. The frequencies of CFTR mutations detected in Tuscany are reported in Table 3. The five most frequent CFTR mutations in Tuscany (DF508, G542X, L1065P, N1303K, and E585X) were significantly less common in FN cases (41.7% of alleles) than in true-positive cases (60.4% of alleles; p = 0.029). In the group of FN patients, there was also a significantly greater prevalence of alleles with unknown mutations (8.3% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.001).

4. Discussion

CF NBS offers the opportunity for early medical and nutritional intervention, leading to improved outcomes [8]. In Tuscany, two NBS strategies were employed during the 26 years of this study. In the period during which DNA analysis was employed in the NBS algorithm (2011–2018), fewer FNs occurred, and the sensitivity improved from 87.50% to 96.15%. Overall, the screening program has proved effective in detecting 90.0% of CF cases at birth. The occurrence of FN results in CF newborns with meconium ileus (6/22 in our results) is reported in the literature [34]. However, it is not a concern, as these patients must always undergo a sweat test [10]. The situation of FN patients without meconium ileus who manifest CF symptoms at an older age is completely different, as a delay in diagnosis can compromise the nutritional status and lung function in such cases [35,36].
A disadvantage of CF NBS, particularly in regions with high allelic CFTR heterogeneity, is the detection of false-positive cases and/or carriers of a single CF-causing mutation [8]. Moreover, with the introduction of DNA analysis to the NBS algorithm, the number of CFSPID cases has increased [37]. These aspects of NBS may cause diagnostic dilemmas and, consequently, unnecessary anxiety for the family [38]. The problems associated with identifying CFSPID and/or mild cases of CF on NBS are well discussed by Munck et al. [32].
Our results, similar to those of Calvin et al. [26], have shown that the cutoff of IRT1 is the main determinant of sensitivity.
Our study focused on the symptoms suggestive of CF in 18 patients born in Tuscany with FN results in CF NBS. The symptoms suggestive of a CF diagnosis that prompt physicians to prescribe a sweat test are various in the literature; malnutrition and/or respiratory symptoms were the most common at the time of diagnosis [20,25,26]. In case reports, the clinical symptoms of malnutrition and/or respiratory symptoms were also most common at the time of diagnosis [23,24]. In Tuscany, respiratory symptoms (cough and respiratory infections), often in association with other clinical features (e.g., gastroenteric symptoms, failure to thrive, salt-loss syndrome), were the most common (44.2%). Metabolic alkalosis was noted in the prescreening literature as a prominent symptom before CF testing was available [39,40]. Our results illustrate that, in our region, metabolic alkalosis was a frequent clinical event that led to CF diagnosis (38.8%) in FN cases. There could be an association between alkalosis and rare CFTR mutations such as S737F, which has already been shown to be associated with salt-loss syndrome at diagnosis [41]. These data are different from those in the study of Padoan et al., where only 3 out of 15 FN patients (20.0%) in Lombardy had metabolic alkalosis at diagnosis [25]. In the research of Calvin et al., carried out in a region of England, no cases with false-negative results had salt-loss syndrome at diagnosis [26]. Another explanation of the higher frequency of salt-loss syndrome in Tuscany could be that this region has a hotter climate in comparison to the regions of Northern Italy and England. In our study, during the period in which DNA analysis was included in the protocol, all FN patients had salt-loss syndrome at diagnosis. The age at diagnosis for FN patients ranged from 4 months to 22 years, and CF was always diagnosed within the first year of life in the case of salt-loss syndrome.
We can speculate that if these FN patients had been somehow diagnosed by NBS, thanks to early saline supplementation, they probably would not have had salt-loss syndrome, a life-threatening event for an infant with CF. After the first year of life, respiratory symptoms, nasal polyposis, and the failure to thrive, associated with gastroenterological symptoms such as diarrhea, should lead the pediatrician to suspect CF. Only three FN patients presented with classical CF disease at diagnosis: respiratory and gastroenteric symptoms associated with failure to thrive (I, Q, R patients in Table 2). Pancreatitis, liver disease, diabetes, and DIOS were not found to be onset CF symptoms for FN patients. Conversely, of the 15 FN cases in Lombardy [24], 2 had recurrent abdominal pain and acute pancreatitis-like symptoms at diagnosis. In the literature, only one FN case was described with liver disease (cholestasis) at diagnosis [22]. The presence of mild CF in FN patients must be reported, such as case A, in which the patient had no symptoms (the older brother with mild CF was born in the prescreening era), and case E, in which the patient was diagnosed at age 15 for mild respiratory symptoms. Usually, FNs have pancreatic sufficiency (13/18, 72.2%), which could reflect the less severe clinical features in these subjects compared to CF true-positive cases (pancreas sufficiency in 41/160, 26.6%).
When CF is suspected, the gold standard of diagnostic tests still remains the sweat test, which was frequently already abnormal upon the first determination in our series. Indeed, only three patients (C, O, P patients in Table 2) had a borderline sweat test upon first determination and were CF-positive (chloride ≥60 mEq) upon subsequent determinations. These data confirm the need to repeat sweat chloride testing over time, especially for patients carrying CFTR mutations with varying clinical consequences [42]. The presence of FNs, despite the presence of well-organized CF NBS, must recommend that one always keep a vigilant eye on the possibility that a patient may have CF.
The CFTR molecular analysis of true-positive cases and FNs revealed a high heterogeneity of CFTR allele mutations in Tuscany. DF508 accounted for only 45.6% of the CF cases, according to the data on the prevalence of about 50% of the alleles in the Italian population [43]. In the FN cases, the most common mutations in Tuscany (DF508, G542X, L1065P, N1303K, and E585X), were found more rarely. This is the reason it is essential, in regions such as Tuscany with a high CFTR allelic heterogeneity, to always adopt NBS that analyzes a large panel of mutations to keep the sensitivity at high levels. The difficulty in planning the NBS strategy lies in balancing greater sensitivity with specificity and positive predictive value, thus avoiding the detection of CF carriers and inconclusive diagnoses. A key aspect in regions such as Tuscany with high CFTR allelic variability is that all mutations detected by screening must be CF-causing mutations. Another consideration based on these data is that when the suspicion of CF is strong, it is always necessary to perform a sweat test first. It is not prudent to trust the genetic test exclusively, given the high number of rare mutations, mutations with variable clinical consequences, and unknown mutations.

5. Conclusions

This study confirms the evidence that CF NBS is a valid public health strategy to detect the majority of CF cases at birth (90% in 26 years). While the sensitivity of CF NBS has been improved over the years, especially with the introduction of DNA analysis to the NBS algorithm, CF was not detected by screening in some babies because it was under the IRT1 cutoff. These patients (in total, 18 cases), born in Tuscany from 1992 to 2018, showed symptoms suggestive of CF during infancy, childhood, adolescence, or later. An interesting finding is that 38.8% of the FN patients manifested salt-loss syndrome (hypochloremic alkalosis) in the first year of life (associated or not with respiratory or nutritional/digestive symptoms). The median age at the diagnosis of Tuscan FN patients was 0.9 years. FN patients frequently have rare or unknown CFTR mutations compared with true-positive cases, and this confirms that a sweat test should be the primary test. Our results also show the importance of feedback of CF diagnoses in the CF screening centers. This study highlights the need for an improvement of CF NBS and the importance of maintaining vigilance toward clinical manifestations suggestive of CF. Having performed an efficient NBS test does not preclude a diagnosis of CF. A delay in diagnosis for FN patients can be shortened by a vigilant clinician.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.T., V.T., M.C.C., A.S.N., V.G., G.M., C.C. and D.G.P.; data curation: M.B., V.T., G.M. and F.F.; formal analysis: G.T., M.B. and G.M.; funding acquisition: V.T.; investigation: M.B., V.T. and G.M.; methodology: M.B. and F.F.; resources: M.C.C., A.S.N., V.G., C.C. and F.F.; software, G.M.; supervision: G.T., C.C., D.G.P. and F.F.; validation: G.T. and F.F.; visualization: G.T., V.T., M.C.C., A.S.N., V.G., G.M., C.C. and D.G.P.; writing—original draft: M.B.; writing—review and editing: G.T., M.B. and V.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Italian Cystic Fibrosis Research Foundation—project FFC#30/2018—with the contribution of the Delegazione FFC di Siena, Delegazione FFC di Monterotondo Roma, and Delegazione FFC di Olbia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study.

References

  1. Ratjen, F.; Doring, G. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2003, 361, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bell, S.C.; Mall, M.; Gutierrez, H.; Macek, M.; Madge, S.; Davies, J.C.; Burgel, P.-R.; Tullis, E.; Castaños, C.; Castellani, C.; et al. The future of cystic fibrosis care: A global perspective. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 65–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tsui, L.; Buchwald, M.; Barker, D.; Braman, J.; Knowlton, R.; Schumm, J.; Eiberg, H.; Mohr, J.; Kennedy, D.; Plavsic, N.; et al. Cystic fibrosis locus defined by a genetically linked polymorphic DNA marker. Science 1985, 230, 1054–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Morral, N.; Bertranpetit, J.; Estivill, X.; Nunes, V.; Casals, T.; Giménez, J.; Reis, A.; Varon-Mateeva, R.; Macek, M.; Kalaydjieva, L.; et al. The origin of the major cystic fibrosis mutation (ΔF508) in European populations. Nat. Genet. 1994, 7, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Terlizzi, V.; Tosco, A.; Tomaiuolo, R.; Sepe, A.; Amato, N.; Casale, A.; Mercogliano, C.; De Gregorio, F.; Improta, F.; Elce, A.; et al. Prediction of acute pancreatitis risk based on PIP score in children with cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2014, 13, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Terlizzi, V.; Lucarelli, M.; Salvatore, D.; Angioni, A.; Bisogno, A.; Braggion, C.; Buzzetti, R.; Carnovale, V.; Casciaro, R.; Castaldo, G.; et al. Clinical expression of cystic fibrosis in a large cohort of Italian siblings. BMC Pulm. Med. 2018, 18, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Patient Registry Report; Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Castellani, C.; Massie, J.; Sontag, M.; Southern, K.W. Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2016, 4, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pederzini, F.; Cabrini, G.; Faraguna, D.; Giglio, L.; Mengarda, G.; Pedrotti, D.; Mastella, G. Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis using blood trypsin with complementary meconium lactase: An advisable strategy for the population of southern Europe. Screening 1995, 3, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castellani, C.; Duff, A.; Bell, S.C.; Heijerman, H.G.; Munck, A.; Ratjen, F.; Sermet-Gaudelus, I.; Southern, K.W.; Barben, J.; Flume, P.A.; et al. ECFS best practice guidelines: The 2018 revision. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2018, 17, 153–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Farrell, P.M.; White, T.B.; Ren, C.; Hempstead, S.E.; Accurso, F.; Derichs, N.; Howenstine, M.; McColley, S.A.; Rock, M.; Rosenfeld, M.; et al. Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis: Consensus Guidelines from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. J. Pediatr. 2017, 181, S4–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Barben, J.; Castellani, C.; Dankert-Roelse, J.; Gartner, S.; Kashirskaya, N.; Linnane, B.; Mayell, S.; Munck, A.; Sands, D.; Sommerburg, O.; et al. The expansion and performance of national newborn screening programmes for cystic fibrosis in Europe. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2016, 16, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry 2014 Annual Data Report; Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. Giordani, B.; Amato, A.; Majo, F.; Ferrari, G.; Quattrucci, S.; Minicucci, L.; Padoan, R.; Floridia, G.; Salvatore, D.; Carnovale, V.; et al. Last Italian Register of Cystic Fibrosis. Report 2015–2016. Epidemiol. Prev. 2019, 43, 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  15. Grosse, S.D.; A Boyle, C.; Botkin, J.R.; Comeau, A.M.; Kharrazi, M.; Rosenfeld, M.; Wilfond, B.S. Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: Evaluation of benefits and risks and recommendations for state newborn screening programs. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2004, 53, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Henry, R.; Boulton, T.; Roddick, L. False negative results on newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. J. Paediatr. Child Health 1990, 26, 150–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. MacLean, J.; Solomon, M.; Corey, M.; Selvadurai, H. Cystic fibrosis newborn screening does not delay the identification of cystic fibrosis in children with negative results. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2011, 10, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Sosnay, P.R.; White, T.B.; Farrell, P.M.; Ren, C.L.; Derichs, N.; Howenstine, M.S.; Nick, J.A.; De Boeck, K. Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in non screened populations. J. Pediatr. 2017, 181, S52–S57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Fritz, A.; Farrell, P. Estimating the annual number of false negative cystic fibrosis newborn screening tests. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2011, 47, 207–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rock, M.J.; Levy, H.; Zaleski, C.; Farrell, P.M. Factors accounting for a missed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis after newborn screening. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2011, 46, 1166–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Farrell, P.; Sommerburg, O. Toward quality improvement in cystic fibrosis newborn screening: Progress and continuing challenges. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2016, 15, 267–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Heidendael, J.F.; Tabbers, M.M.; De Vreede, I. False negative newborn screen and neonatal cholestasis in a premature child with cystic fibrosis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2013, 173, 1581–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Collaco, J.M.; Panny, S.R.; Hamosh, A.; Mogayzel, P.J., Jr. False Negative Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screen. Clin. Pediatr. 2010, 49, 214–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dunn, C.T.; Skrypek, M.M.; Powers, A.L.R.; Laguna, T.A. The Need for Vigilance: The Case of a False-Negative Newborn Screen for Cystic Fibrosis. Pediatrics 2011, 128, e446–e449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Padoan, R.; Genoni, S.; Moretti, E.; Seia, M.; Giunta, A.; Corbetta, C. Genetic and clinical features of false-negative infants in a neonatal screening programme for cystic fibrosis. Acta Paediatr. 2002, 91, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Calvin, J.; Hogg, S.L.; McShane, D.; McAuley, S.A.; Iles, R.; Ross-Russell, R.; MacLean, F.M.; E Heeley, M.; Heeley, A.F. Thirty-years of screening for cystic fibrosis in East Anglia. Arch. Dis. Child. 2012, 97, 1043–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. LeGrys, V.A.; Yankaskas, J.R.; Quittell, L.M.; Marshall, B.C.; Mogayzel, P.J. Diagnostic Sweat Testing: The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Guidelines. J. Pediatr. 2007, 151, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Festini, F.; Taccetti, G.; Galici, V.; Campana, S.; Mergni, G.; Repetto, T. Long-term health outcomes of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Arch. Dis. Child. 2008, 93, 357–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ryckman, K.K.; Berberich, S.L.; Shchelochkov, O.A.; Cook, D.E.; Murray, J.C. Clinical and environmental influences on metabolic biomarkers collected for newborn screening. Clin. Biochem. 2012, 46, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kloosterboer, M.; Hoffman, G.; Gershan, W.M.; Laxova, A.; Li, Z.; Farrell, P.; Rock, M. Clarification of Laboratory and Clinical Variables That Influence Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening with Initial Analysis of Immunoreactive Trypsinogen. Pediatrics 2009, 123, e338–e346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Terlizzi, V.; Mergni, G.; Buzzetti, R.; Centrone, C.; Zavataro, L.; Braggion, C. Cystic fibrosis screen positive inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPIS): Experience in Tuscany, Italy. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2019, 18, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Munck, A.; Mayell, S.; Winters, V.; Shawcross, A.; Derichs, N.; Parad, R.; Barben, J.; Southern, K. Cystic Fibrosis Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID): A new designation and management recommendations for infants with an inconclusive diagnosis following newborn screening. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2015, 14, 706–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Morinville, V.D.; Husain, S.Z.; Bai, H.; Barth, B.; Alhosh, R.; Durie, P.R.; Freedman, S.D.; Himes, R.W.; Lowe, M.E.; Pohl, J.; et al. Definitions of pediatric pancreatitis and survey of present clinical practices. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2012, 55, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rusakow, L.S.; Abman, S.H.; Sokol, R.J.; Seltzer, W.; Hammond, K.B.; Accurso, F.J. Immunoreactive trypsinogen levels in infants with cystic fibrosis complicated by meconium ileus. Screening 1993, 2, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Southern, K.W.; Mérelle, M.M.; Dankert-Roelse, J.E.; Nagelkerke, A.D. Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane. Database Syst. Rev. 2009, 21, CD001402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Accurso, F.J.; Sontag, M.K.; Wagener, J.S. Complications associated with symptomatic diagnosis in infants with cystic fibrosis. J. Pediatr. 2005, 147, S37–S41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ren, C.; Borowitz, D.; Gonska, T.; Howenstine, M.S.; Levy, H.; Massie, J.; Milla, C.; Munck, A.; Southern, K.W. Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator-Related Metabolic Syndrome and Cystic Fibrosis Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis. J. Pediatr. 2017, 181, S45–S51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Tluczek, A.; Mischler, E.H.; Farrell, P.M.; Fost, N.; Peterson, N.M.; Carey, P.; Bruns, W.T.; McCarthy, C. Parents’ Knowledge of Neonatal Screening and Response to False-Positive Cystic Fibrosis Testing. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 1992, 13, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gibson, L.; Cooke, R. A test for concentration of electrolytes in sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas utilizing pilocarpine by iontophoresis. Pediatrics 1959, 23, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Gottlieb, R.P. Metabolic alkalosis in cystic fibrosis. J. Pediatr. 1971, 79, 930–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Terlizzi, V.; Di Lullo, A.M.; Comegna, M.; Centrone, C.; Pelo, E.; Castaldo, G.; Raia, V.; Braggion, C. S737F is a new CFTR mutation typical of patients originally from the Tuscany region in Italy. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2018, 44, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Terlizzi, V.; Mergni, G.; Centrone, C.; Festini, F.; Taccetti, G. Trend of sweat chloride values in a cohort of patients carrying CFTR mutations of varying clinical consequence: Is there a risk of increasing sweat chloride over time? Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2020, 55, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rendine, S.; Calafell, F.; Cappello, N.; Gagliardini, R.; Caramia, G.; Rigillo, N.; Silvetti, M.; Zanda, M.; Miano, A.; Battistini, F.; et al. Genetic history of cystic fibrosis mutations in Italy. Reg. Distrib. Ann. Hum. Genet. 1997, 61, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CF NBS) algorithm adopted in Tuscany from 1992. The CFTR mutations analysis (on the right side of the graphs) was introduced in 2011.
Figure 1. Cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CF NBS) algorithm adopted in Tuscany from 1992. The CFTR mutations analysis (on the right side of the graphs) was introduced in 2011.
Diagnostics 10 00446 g001
Table 1. Data from the 1992–2018 Cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CF NBS). Percentages as related to all cystic fibrosis (CF) cases of column are included in parentheses.
Table 1. Data from the 1992–2018 Cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CF NBS). Percentages as related to all cystic fibrosis (CF) cases of column are included in parentheses.
IRT1/IRT2 + LACT (1992–2010)IRT1/IRT2 + LACT + IRT1/DNA (2011–2018)Total
Newborns screened for CF514,841231,845746,686
Newborns with negative screening513,619231,227744,846
Non-CF newborns with negative screening
(true negative)
513,603231,225744,828
CF newborns with negative screening
(false negative)
16 (11.2%)2 (3.4%)18 (8.9%)
Number of sweat tests
(newborns with positive screening)
12226181840
CF newborns with positive screening
(true positive)
112 (78.3%)50 (84.7%)162 (80.2%)
Non-CF newborns with positive screening
(false positive)
11105681678
CF newborns diagnosed with meconium ileus15 (10.5%)7 (11.9%)22 (10.9%)
Sensitivity (%)87.5096.1590.00
Specificity (%)99.7899.7599.77
Positive predictive value (%)9.168.098.80
Negative predictive value (%)99.99799.99999.997
IRT: immunoreactive trypsin assay; LACT: meconium lactase dosage; DNA: CFTR panel analysis.
Table 2. Features of false-negative (FN) patients: genotype, symptoms, first immunoreactive trypsinogen dose (IRT1), age at diagnosis, pancreas status, and sweat test.
Table 2. Features of false-negative (FN) patients: genotype, symptoms, first immunoreactive trypsinogen dose (IRT1), age at diagnosis, pancreas status, and sweat test.
FN PatientsYear of BirthIRT1 µg/L
(Cutoff)
CFTR Mutation 1CFTR Mutation 2Symptoms and Signs Suggestive of CFAge at DiagnosisPancreas StatusSweat Test (Chloride mEq)
A1993<55 (55)G542XD110Hasymptomatic
(family history)
22 yearsPS89-80
B1995<58 (58)DF508E831Xnasal polyposis20 yearsPS104-96
C1996<58 (58)DF508unknownrespiratory20 yearsPS58-42-72-83
D1997<60 (60)G542Xunknownrespiratory +
nasal polyposis
17 yearsPS62-67
E1999<58 (58)DF5085T/12TGrespiratory15 yearsPS78-100
F1999<58 (58)DF508unknownfailure to thrive + gastroenteric4 monthsPD110-115
G200139 (54)DF508G542Xnasal polyposis5 yearsPD80-94
H200137 (54)S737FDel exon 22–24salt-loss syndrome + respiratory1 yearPS82-89
I200348 (54)DF508DF508respiratory + failure to thrive + gastroenteric4 monthsPD110-153
L200345 (54)W1282XDF311salt-loss syndrome5 monthsPS60-63-85-93
M200547 (62)DF311Del exon 2salt-loss syndrome + failure to thrive4 monthsPS75-71
N200652 (57)L206W3659delCsalt-loss syndrome10 monthsPS90-65-156
O200641 (57)L1065P5T/13TGrespiratory12 yearsPS52-61-40-69-101
P200831 (60)S737FS737Fsalt-loss syndrome7 monthsPS45-46-93-64-98
Q201051 (63)DF508DF508respiratory + failure to thrive + gastroenteric4 monthsPD102-96
R201054 (63)DF508Delexon 22–24respiratory + failure to thrive + gastroenteric10 monthsPD125-125
S201515 (50)E831XG126Dsalt-loss syndrome11 monthsPS67-74-70
T201627 (49)N1303KL997Fsalt-loss syndrome + failure to thrive11 monthsPS60-58-84-67
PS: pancreas sufficiency; PD: pancreas deficiency.
Table 3. Frequencies of CFTR mutations in 360 cystic fibrosis CFTR alleles in Tuscany (324 CFTR alleles of true positive cases and 36 CFTR alleles of FNs).
Table 3. Frequencies of CFTR mutations in 360 cystic fibrosis CFTR alleles in Tuscany (324 CFTR alleles of true positive cases and 36 CFTR alleles of FNs).
True-Positive CasesFalse-Negative Cases
MutationsFrequency (%)MutationsFrequency (%)
DF50845.6DF50827.7
G542X5.5G542X8.3
L1065P3.7S737F8.3
N1303K3.1Delexon 22–245.5
E585X2.5L1065P2.7
2789+5G->A2.5W1282X2.7
Delexon 22–242.2N1303K2.7
R347P2.2Other rare mutations33.3
W1282X2.2Unknown8.3
T338I2.2
R553X1.8
S737F1.3
2183AA->G1.3
Other rare mutations22.8
Unknown1.1

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taccetti, G.; Botti, M.; Terlizzi, V.; Cavicchi, M.C.; Neri, A.S.; Galici, V.; Mergni, G.; Centrone, C.; Peroni, D.G.; Festini, F. Clinical and Genotypical Features of False-Negative Patients in 26 Years of Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening in Tuscany, Italy. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070446

AMA Style

Taccetti G, Botti M, Terlizzi V, Cavicchi MC, Neri AS, Galici V, Mergni G, Centrone C, Peroni DG, Festini F. Clinical and Genotypical Features of False-Negative Patients in 26 Years of Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening in Tuscany, Italy. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(7):446. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070446

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taccetti, Giovanni, Matteo Botti, Vito Terlizzi, Maria Chiara Cavicchi, Anna Silvia Neri, Valeria Galici, Gianfranco Mergni, Claudia Centrone, Diego G. Peroni, and Filippo Festini. 2020. "Clinical and Genotypical Features of False-Negative Patients in 26 Years of Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening in Tuscany, Italy" Diagnostics 10, no. 7: 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070446

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop