Next Article in Journal
The Hidden Charm of Life
Next Article in Special Issue
Unity Makes Strength: A Review on Mutualistic Symbiosis in Representative Insect Clades
Previous Article in Journal
Is Research on “Synthetic Cells” Moving to the Next Level?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Signals of Adaptation towards Mutualism and Sociality in Two Ambrosia Beetle Complexes
Article Menu
Issue 1 (March) cover image

Export Article

Article
Metatranscriptomic Analysis of the Bacterial Symbiont Dactylopiibacterium carminicum from the Carmine Cochineal Dactylopius coccus (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Dactylopiidae)
1
Center for Genomic Sciences, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM, Cuernavaca, Morelos C.P. 62210, Mexico
2
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 October 2018 / Accepted: 25 December 2018 / Published: 3 January 2019

Abstract

:
The scale insect Dactylopius coccus produces high amounts of carminic acid, which has historically been used as a pigment by pre-Hispanic American cultures. Nowadays carmine is found in food, cosmetics, and textiles. Metagenomic approaches revealed that Dactylopius spp. cochineals contain two Wolbachia strains, a betaproteobacterium named Candidatus Dactylopiibacterium carminicum and Spiroplasma, in addition to different fungi. We describe here a transcriptomic analysis indicating that Dactylopiibacterium is metabolically active inside the insect host, and estimate that there are over twice as many Dactylopiibacterium cells in the hemolymph than in the gut, with even fewer in the ovary. Albeit scarce, the transcripts in the ovaries support the presence of Dactylopiibacterium in this tissue and a vertical mode of transmission. In the cochineal, Dactylopiibacterium may catabolize plant polysaccharides, and be active in carbon and nitrogen provisioning through its degradative activity and by fixing nitrogen. In most insects, nitrogen-fixing bacteria are found in the gut, but in this study they are shown to occur in the hemolymph, probably delivering essential amino acids and riboflavin to the host from nitrogen substrates derived from nitrogen fixation.
Keywords:
scale insect; Opuntia; endosymbiont; betaproteobacteria; nitrogen-fixation: gut microbiota; polysaccharide catabolism

1. Introduction

Scale insects may have evolved in the Jurassic and Triassic periods [1], hence around 150–250 million years ago. Most scale insect species feed on plant sap, and many, though not all, are considered plant pests. Similar to other invertebrates, scale insects may contain specialized cells called bacteriocytes, which harbor bacterial symbionts inherited by their progeny [2]. Endosymbionts are largely dependent on their hosts, have reduced genomes, and provide amino acids or vitamins to the insects. In scale insects, flavobacterial endosymbionts are commonly found with other co-symbionts that in most cases are gammaproteobacteria, and in few cases Wolbachia (reviewed in [2]).
The carmine cochineal (Dactylopius coccus) is a scale insect that feeds on the sap of Opuntia cactus and several other cacti. It has commercial value [3], as it is used to produce the carmine dye for food, textiles, cosmetics, and pharmaceutics, as well as for art and crafts. In the insect, carminic acid may function as a defense substance against predators [4,5]. This red dye has been used by pre-Hispanic cultures for a long time, since D. coccus was domesticated at least 1000 years ago [6], and it is still controversial whether domestication occurred in Peru or Mexico [7,8]. Carmine has remained in use as it is considered innocuous, while other dyes have adverse health effects [6]. Other wild Dactylopius species also produce carminic acid, but in reduced quantities and quality, and the insects are more aggressive plant pests [6,9]. The cochineal feeds on the cactus phloem that contains sugars and some amino acids [10], as well as soluble polysaccharides, proteins, peptides, and even RNAs [11,12,13,14]. Like many scale insects, cochineals exhibit sexual dimorphism [1]. Females have four developmental stages: eggs, first instar nymph, second instar nymph, and adults that are sessile. Adult females have a length of around 4–6 mm. Males have six developmental stages. Under optimal environmental conditions, the female cycle lasts around three months [15].
Notably, the cochineals Dactylopius spp. do not contain flavobacterial endosymbionts or bacteriomes (special organs with insect cells that contain bacterial endosymbionts), as other scale insects do; they instead harbor a betaproteobacterium named Candidatus Dactylopiibacterium carminicum (hereafter abbreviated as Dactylopiibacterium), two strains of Wolbachia (wDacA and wDacB), and a Spiroplasma [16,17], in addition to various fungi [18]. Other bacteria that have been sporadically found may represent transient gut bacteria that were acquired from the host plant [19].
Dactylopiibacterium was detected in all tested individuals from the domesticated D. coccus, from the wild species Dactylopius ceylonicus, D. confusus, D. opuntiae, and D. tomentosus [17], and in the ovaries of D. coccus and D. opuntiae [19]. The genomes of Dactylopiibacterium recovered from the metagenomes from females and males of D. coccus, as well as those recovered from the wild species D. opuntiae were published [17]. Due to their large genome, Dactylopiibacterium seems to be a recently acquired cochineal symbiont [17]. Dactylopiibacterium has not been isolated in culture media, and is phylogenetically placed in the betaproteobacteria family of Rhodocyclales, closely related to Azoarcus, an efficient nitrogen-fixing endophyte of rice and grasses [20]. Nitrogen fixation and expression of the nitrogenase subunit nifH gene (evaluated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) were detected in the hemolymph and ovaries from Dactylopius spp. [17]. In insects such as ants, termites, bark beetles, and fruit flies that feed on high carbon and low nitrogen diets, there are also nitrogen-fixing bacteria that are located in the gut [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Dactylopiibacterium may also synthesize amino acids and vitamins. However, little is known of the function of the symbionts from the carmine cochineal. We report here a metatranscriptomic study from dissected gut and ovaries, as well as from the hemolymph of the cochineal D. coccus, shedding light on the metabolic functions of Dactylopiibacterium in its host.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tissue Dissection, RNA Extraction, and Sequencing

Second instar nymphs of female cochineals (Figure 1) were detached from cactus and rinsed with ethanol 90%. Here we used a pool of 30 s instar nymphs for each replicate, and three replicates were used. However, each individual may have been in a slightly different stage, because they were not synchronized populations. The cochineals were dissected using autoclaved forceps cleaned with RNaseZAP (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to remove whole gut (including foregut, midgut, hindgut, and Malpighian tubules) and ovaries, and hemolymph was collected (three samples from the same individuals) with RNAse-free pipette tips. Before dissecting the gut and ovaries, insects were bled from the dorsal thorax with a sterile syringe to collect the hemolymph. The dissected guts and ovaries were rinsed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline, (PBS) to remove remnant hemolymph. Tissues were maintained on ice with RNAlater, an RNA stabilizing reagent (Qiagen) that was subsequently removed.
A modified RNEeasy (Qiagen) procedure with lysozyme and DNAse I was used as reported by Guerrero-Castro et al. [27]. RNA was quantified by Nanodrop and visualized in 1% electrophoresis gels. RNA integrity was analysed with an Agilent 2200 TapeStation (Santa Clara, CA USA). High-quality RNA samples were used for strand-specific library preparation by TruSeq Stranded Total RNA kit (Illumina), and rRNA was removed with the RiboZero Removal kit for Bacteria (Illumina). Nine libraries were generated, three for each tissue used (hemolymph, gut, and ovary), and they were sequenced using one lane on an Illumina HiSeq4000 sequencer (Macrogen, Korea) with a 100 bp read length pair end protocol.

2.2. Bioinformatic Analyses

2.2.1. Mapping to Reference Genome, Core Transcriptome, and Differential Expression Analysis

The quality of raw reads was inspected with FASTQC v0.11.6 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). We found that all reads had a quality above 32 Phred quality score. Even though all libraries were subjected to ribosomal depletion, after quality-check, small (SSU) and large (LSU) subunits of ribosomal gene sequences were detected in the samples, and manually removed by home-made Perl and bash scripts. All high-quality reads were mapped to Dactylopiibacterium NFE1 genome (MQNN00000000) using bowtie2 v2.3.0 [28] (parameters: --very_sensitive -1 x_R1.fq -2 x_R2.fq -p 30). Mapped reads from each sample were independently recovered and transformed to BAM files by samtools v1.7 parameters: view –bS. Relative abundance (in percentage of mapped reads) of Dactylopiibacterium transcripts present in each tissue were calculated from BAM stats files obtained by the samtools stats command. Subsequently, sorting for position was done with parameter sort to obtain the files x.bam.sorted [29]. Artemis was used to obtain the total raw transcripts counts from the mapped reads against NFE1 genome [30] using the BAM files as well as the fasta and gene feature format (gff) files. BAM files were deposited as an NCBI bioproject under accession number PRJNA355137.
For gene expression level quantification, transcripts per million (TPM) values were calculated with RSEM v1.2.31 pipeline [31], using the pair-mapped transcripts from BAM files described above and a gene-transfer format (GTF) file from the NFE1 Dactylopiibacterium genome. Total TPM abundance–expression matrices for each replicate of all treatments were obtained by the abundance_estimates_to_matrix.pl Trinity v2.5.1 utility script, using the RSEM gene-result files. Average log2TPM were manually obtained from TPM-abundance matrices and merged in a single average-log2TPM matrix.
Differentially expressed genes between gut and hemolymph samples were obtained with a NOISeq v2.24.0 Bioconductor package. Raw counts of mapped transcripts data were normalized using the trimmed mean of M-values method (TMM). Differentially expressed genes were selected with the following criteria: false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of 0.95, adjusted p-values equal or below 0.05, and absolute fold changes over 1 [32]. Due to the low number of transcripts, ovary samples were not included in any of the differential expression analyses, though we determined which genes were expressed in this tissue and included them in the flagella gene expression analysis.

2.2.2. Metabolic Analysis and Construction of a Metabolic Model

To construct a Dactylopiibacterium metabolic and membrane protein model from expression genes, mapped reads were assigned to genes, and those genes that were expressed in two of the three replicates from each tissue were retained. All genes were sorted and grouped by clusters of orthologous group (COG) categories. For this, all positive expressed genes were blasted to COG database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/). Once classified, iPATH3 (Interactive Pathways Explorer v3, https://pathways.embl.de/) was used to construct the metabolic maps from each tissue [33]; these were used to construct a Dactylopiibacterium core metabolism using predesigned images [34]. Additionally, for enzymatic and metabolic pathway categorizing, all expressed genes were annotated with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database using BlastKoala [35]. Enzymatic and protein annotation from each gene were retrieved from their corresponding KO numbers using the KEGG REST server package from Bioconductor (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/KEGGREST.html). The presence or absence of genes for particular metabolic pathways (i.e., flagella production or secretion system) from different Dactylopius tissues were plotted using the KEGG Mapper-Reconstruct pathway tool (https://www.kegg.jp/kegg/tool/map_pathway.html).

2.2.3. Quantitative Analysis

Dactylopiibacterium transcript-reads (selected as described above in Section 2.2.1) were used to calculate the ratios of the sum of read numbers obtained in total from the hemolymph and the gut shown in Figure 2. Ratios were obtained as well by comparing each gene in pairs of distinct tissues (gut/hemolymph, hemolymph/gut) by dividing the sum of reads from hemolymph or gut by the sum of reads from gut or hemolymph, respectively. In cases where the divisor was 0, it was changed to one, since division by zero is not defined. The number of reads from the hemolymph were adjusted (see Results). Ratios were also numerically ordered and ranked.

3. Results

3.1. Dactylopiibacterium Expression in the Carmine Cochineal with Core Transcriptome Analysis

A low proportion of transcripts in metatranscriptomes from the hemolymph, gut, and ovary were from Dactylopiibacterium (0.07%, 0.04%, and 0.01%, respectively)—most transcripts were from the cochineal insect and from Wolbachia. In total, the numbers of Dactylopiibacterium transcripts recovered from hemolymph, gut, and ovary were 66442, 31312 and 8759, respectively (Figure 2), thus we estimated that there were 2.1 times more reads from hemolymph than from gut and 7.5 times more reads from hemolymph than from ovary. 2083, 1867, and 972 genes expressed in insect hemolymph, gut, and ovary, respectively, were used to reconstruct the biochemical pathways, whereas genes expressed in common were used to depict a core of Dactylopiibacterium functions in the cochineal, and are marked in red (Figure 3).
Transcripts found in the gut and hemolymph were from genes encoding enzymes of the glycolytic pathway, Krebs cycle, all amino acids (except asparagine), purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis, all ribosomal proteins, and aminoacyl tRNA ligases. Other common transcripts were from genes encoding chaperonin GroEL, elongation factor Tu, FtsH, and FtsZ for bacterial cell division. Additional transcripts were for enzymes involved in galacturonic acid metabolism, namely D-altronate hydrolase, tagaturonate reductase and glucuronate isomerase (UaxA (EC 4.2.1.8), UaxB (EC:1.1.1.58) and UaxC (EC:5.3.1.12), respectively; Table S1a), constituting a biochemical pathway that ends in the production of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and consequently leads to pyruvate. In the hemolymph and gut, expressed genes encode transcriptional regulators and genes encoding rhamnogalacturonan lyases (EC:4.2.2.2; Table S1a).
Nitrogen-fixing capability has been previously associated with Dactylopiibacterium [17]. COG category analysis showed the presence of signal transduction histidine kinase (NtrY) involved in nitrogen fixation and metabolism regulation (COG 5000) in all the tissues. Additionally, an expression level of 2.17 and 5.17 log2TPM for the gene encoding the catalytic nitrogenase molybdenum iron protein (nifD) was observed from hemolymph and ovary respectively (Table S1a). The analysis of nitrogen-fixing associated genes showed the presence of the nitrogenase electron donor ferredoxin fixA and Pi II nitrogen sensor protein also in hemolymph (Table S1a). Previously nifH gene expression was detected in hemolymph and ovary [17]. Furthermore, genes for molybdenum and iron transporters (ABC-transporter and permeases) were expressed in the gut and hemolymph (Table S1a). In the ovary, expression of iron transporters was detected (Table S1a).
Expression analysis revealed high TPM values of genes for the Dactylopiibacterium proteins involved in flagellar assembly (Figure 4a,b). In particular, the transcriptional regulator for flagella (flhD) is highly expressed in all three tissues sampled (Figure 4a,b, Table S1a). However, the flagellar biosynthesis regulator anti-σ-factor flgM is only expressed in the gut and hemolymph (Figure 4a,b, Table S1a). Flagellar motor proteins also showed different expression patterns; in hemolymph the three canonical genes for flagellar rotation and motor switching (fliG, fliM and fliN) were highly expressed (log2TPM > 3, Figure 4a,b; Table S1a). In the gut fliG and fliN were also expressed, and in the ovary only fliN transcripts were observed. This evidence suggests that bacteriaare motile in hemolymph. Other genes related to motility and intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport (COG N and U categories) were found expressed in all tissues. Multiple genes related to Type IV pili (Tfp) were found expressed in all tissues (Figure S1a), while genes pilO, pilN, and pilP were expressed only in the ovary. The chemotaxis cheA gene was found expressed in all three Dactylopius tissues sampled. The cheBD and cheVYW genes were transcribed in the gut and hemolymph, respectively.
Genes for two different secretion systems were also expressed in Dactylopiibacterium. Particularly, alpha-hemolysin/cyclolysin transport system (hlyB, cyaB) and the outer membrane protein (TolC) of the bacterial secretion system 1 were highly expressed in Dactylopius hemolymph, gut, and ovary (Figure 4c,d; Table S1a). Additionally, genes for the ATPase (GspE) and general secretion pathway proteins F, G, and D (GspF, GspG, and GspD) associated with the bacterial secretion system 2 were expressed in all tissues (Figure 4c,d; Table S1a). Genes for general secretion pathway proteins I and J (GspI and GspJ) were also found in the hemolymph and gut (Figure 4c,d; Table S1a).
The carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) analysis [36] was used to define polysaccharide catabolic domains. The CAZyme toolkit revealed domains for exo-pectate lyases (PL; EC 4.2.2-) PL1 and PL3, as well as an exo-polygalacturonase (PL2) and for rhamnogalacturonan endolyase (PL11) and oligogalacturonate lyase (PL22). Additionally, some glycosyl hydrolases (GH; EC 3.2.1), and endoglucanase (GH74) were found expressed (Table S1b, Figure 5). This suggests that Dactylopiibacterium can actively metabolize plant polysaccharides, such as pectin and rhamnogalacturonan I. Furthermore, glycerol may be an additional carbon source for Dactylopiibacterium.

3.2. Differential Expression Analysis with NOISeq

With NOISeq, a total of 207 differentially expressed genes were obtained between the gut and hemolymph samples—116 up-regulated in the gut and 91 in the hemolymph (Table S2). Among the up-regulated genes in the gut samples, the pilus assembly protein Tfp was found (suggesting Dactylopiibacterium uses pili in this tissue), as well as the LysR transcriptional regulator and some transporter genes involved in drug resistance (MdtA). Whereas in the hemolymph samples, highly expressed genes were involved in carbohydrate metabolism (glycolysis and pentose pathway) and cellular replication (segregation/condensation protein A, septum formation inhibitor Maf) (Table 1).

3.3. Dactylopiibacterium Quantitative Transcript Analysis

To expand the results obtained so far, an additional approach was implemented. As there were more Dactylopiibacterium reads from hemolymph than from gut or ovary (Figure 2), it was expected that in hemolymph there would be more ribosomal-protein transcripts, and indeed these were 2.9 times more abundant in comparison to gut. Thus, we used this value to equiparate the number of reads from hemolymph to those from gut, by dividing hemolymph reads by 2.9. With this adjustment, all genes that were equally expressed attained ratios around one as observed for genes encoding ribosomal-proteins (except gene 3388, Table S3a), aminoacyl-tRNA ligases (with the exception of that for glutamate), elongation factor Tu, ATP synthase subunits and cell division proteins FtsH and FtsZ (not shown). Arbitrarily, we defined here that up-regulated genes had ratios of 2 or above 2 and listed them in Table S3b,c. Functional markers were proposed for gut and hemolymph based on this quantitative analysis and NOISeq (Figure 6). When comparing to ovaries, the ratio of hemolymph reads was around seven using ribosomal protein or aminoacyl-tRNA ligase transcript-numbers.
Among all genes, we particularly note transcriptional regulators that were differentially expressed in gut and hemolymph (Table S3b,c), that would lead to further differences in gene regulation. In the gut, these encode ArsR (for metal tolerance, see below), BolA (a master regulator involved in biofilm formation [37]), Com, and YebC, which were not found expressed in the hemolymph. In hemolymph, transcription regulator genes that were found to be highly expressed encode AraC, AsnC, GntR, and NdrR.

4. Discussion

It is a common observation that some bioinformatic programs for differential gene analyses in transcriptomics yield varying results [38]. NOISeq was chosen because it has been used to accurately detect differentially expressed genes [39].
In the domesticated Dactylopius coccus—but also in the wild cochineal D. opuntiae—there are different bacteria. Some of them, such as Wolbachia and Spiroplasma, are commonly found in other insects, while Dactylopiibacterium has only been found in the carmine cochineals and has been consistently found there. We expected that Dactylopiibacterium would exhibit a differential gene expression in the gut, in comparison to hemolymph or ovaries, considering its large genome (3.6 Mb, containing many transcription regulator genes) and the different conditions that exist in the gut compared to the hemolymph, with different nutrients, pH, and oxygen levels.
LysR transcriptional regulators have an important role in rhizobial symbiosis by turning on nodulation genes [40,41]. In the betaproteobacterium Burkholderia cenocepacia, a LysR-type regulator controls morphology and virulence [42]. LysR transcriptional regulators may also regulate genes with diverse functions related to metabolism, motility, and amino acid transport, among others [43]. In Dactylopiibacterium there are 29 LysR regulators, and few of them are expressed in both the gut and the hemolymph. Dactylopiibacterium has many other transcription regulators that could be involved in a differential expression, leading to only a fraction of its genome being expressed under particular conditions.

4.1. Genes Expressed in the Hemolymph and Gut

Genes encoding most ribosomal proteins, tRNA ligases, as well as for the biosynthesis of all the amino acids (except asparagine), were found expressed in the gut and hemolymph, as well as unspecific amino acid transporters, with efflux or influx depending on the gradient between the bacteria and the medium, as occurs with other transporters [44].
In Dactylopiibacterium, the large expression of chaperonin genes, also observed in other insect endosymbionts [45,46,47,48] and bacteria with small genomes [49], could be indicative of the close interaction between Dactylopiibacterium and its host. GroEL, besides being a chaperonin, has versatile roles in the bacteria–insect interactions [50].
We found different hypothetical genes expressed in both the gut and the hemolymph. By being sap-feeders, sucking insects may ingest a diversity of plant-derived molecules, which are particularly diverse. In plant-associated bacteria, many hypothetical genes expressed in plant roots may participate in transporting and degrading many unknown substances from plants [51]. Proline is an amino acid from plant exudates and has been detected in the phloem of the prickly pear cactus O. ficus-indica obtained with Dactylopius opuntiae stylets, although in low quantities compared to other amino acids [10]. The putA encoding proline dehydrogenase required for proline metabolism is normally induced by proline; we suppose that proline is a Dactylopiibacterium nutrient. We found the putA gene expressed in Dactylopiibacterium in both the hemolymph and in the gut.
Concerning nitrogen fixation regulation, sigma 54 transcriptional regulators that are needed by polymerase to transcribe nif genes were found to be expressed in the hemolymph, gut, and ovaries, supporting that nitrogen fixation may occur in all three tissues. Indeed, N fixation was previously reported from the hemolymph and the ovary [17]. The hydrogen necessary for N fixation would be high in the gut, since it is derived from metabolic processes therein, and the low oxygen found in arthropod guts [52] is favorable for nitrogen fixation. The nif gene regulator P II, expressed during nitrogen fixation in the related Azoarcus [53], was found expressed in the gut and hemolymph; the fixA gene encoding the electron donor for nitrogenase, and molybdenum, iron, and sulfate transporter genes were expressed, as well in the gut and hemolymph. Molybdenum and iron are required for nitrogenase activity [54]. Additionally, the transcripts for cbb3-cytochrome c oxidase were found in the hemolymph. This enzyme is known to be up-regulated in proteobacteria when fixing nitrogen in symbiosis in an anaerobic metabolism [55]. A gene encoding fumarate reductase, which is key in reducing quinones in anaerobiosis, was found to be expressed. Glutamine synthetase participates in ammonium assimilation, and its gene was found expressed in the gut and hemolymph.

4.2. Up-Regulated Genes in the Gut

The carmine cochineal feeds on phloem sap, which provides the nutrients that would be found in the insect gut. Sap-sucking insects have been used to analyze the composition of plant phloem [56]. The most abundant amino acids in the phloem of O. ficus-indica, obtained with D. opuntiae stylets, were valine, isoleucine, leucine, glycine, and tyrosine. On the other hand, threonine, cysteine, and histidine were not detected [10]. By producing proteases and peptidases in the gut, Dactylopiibacterium would release additional amino acids from phloem peptides to the host. Dactylopiibacterium-expressed genes for proteases and peptidases were found in the gut.
In the gut, there may be other various competing gut bacteria that would not be found in hemolymph, and this may explain the gene expression that leads to the production of the antibiotic colicin (Table S3c). Bacteria normally compete for iron, and this seems to occur in the gut, as iron acquisition genes were found to be highly expressed. There, hemin uptake genes were found up-regulated. Also found in the genome, though not highly expressed, was a hemin degrading factor gene. Isochorismate synthase, whose gene is highly expressed in Dactylopiibacterium in the gut, may be used to produce a siderophore as in Pseudomonas [57]. This is relevant, as animals keep Fe levels low by conjugating iron, which becomes unavailable to bacteria [58].
From our previous metagenome data from the carmine cochineal [17], we remarked that there were genes for tolerance to metals, both in Dactylopiibacterium and in Wolbachia. Here, we found that some of these were expressed even in the ovaries, suggesting that the insect ingests metals from the cactus. Numerous plants, such as O. ficus-indica, are known for accumulating metals, and have been used for bioremediation [59,60].
Expressed genes for polysaccharide degradation (rhamnogalacturonan I and hemicelluloses) were identified in Dactylopiibacterium from the insect gut and hemolymph. Pectins are complex polysaccharides formed by homogalacturonan (α-1,4-linked d-galacturonic acid) polymer backbones with different decorations [61]. Rhamnogalacturonan I is a complex polysaccharide from plant cell walls and mucilage, which contains a linear backbone composed of diglycosyl repeating unit -4)-α-d-Galactopyranose-(1-2)-α-l-Rhamnopyranose [62,63], and has been identified in the prickly pear cactus O. ficus-indica [64]. Degradation of rhamnogalacturonan relies on multiple extracellular PL and GH enzymes [65]. In other cases, in honeybees, pectin degradation from the pollen occurs in the midgut by well-adapted γ-proteobacteria by pectate lyases [66]. Expression of both exo- and endo-pectinases, as well as rhamnogalacturonases, was detected in dactylopiibacteria from the gut and hemolymph, suggesting that they are capable of degrading this plant polymer. Additionally, enzymes for hemicellulose degradation (GH74) were detected in Dactylopiibacterium in the gut. As described for Erwinia crysanthemi, the expression of genes needed for degrading polymers, such as pectins or cellulose, can be induced by the polymer itself or the monomeric sugar units that constitute them (i.e., glucose [67]); this could explain why we have found polymer degradation genes in hemolymph. The related endophytic β-proteobacterium Azoarcus sp. BH72 has β-glucosidases and cellobiohydrolases for cellulose degradation [68]. Since there are diurnal fluctuations in non-starch polysaccharides that the insect may consume from the plant [10], we expect that gene expression of Dactylopiibacterium carbohydrate catabolic genes may change as well.

4.3. Differentially Expressed Genes in Hemolymph

While plant polysaccharides are unlikely to be found in hemolymph, their degradation products (for example, galacturonic acids like glucoronate) may be found in the hemolymph and used as carbon sources by Dactylopiibacterium. Additionally, C4-organic acids may fuel nitrogen fixation, as occurs in other nitrogen-fixing symbionts, such as rhizobia in nodules in legumes [69,70]. In hemolymph, there is proline [71]. Wolbachia, which is found in the carmine cochineal as well, also has putA for proline degradation [16]. Maybe Wolbachia populations, quite large indeed (data not shown), compete with Dactylopiibacterium for proline. However, nitrogen fixation could confer an advantage to Dactylopiibacterium to contend with wolbachia competition for nitrogen nutrients. Notably, proline was a nutrient that, when added to the culture medium of a plant-associated bacterium, enhanced excreted riboflavin production [72]. A hypothesis was reported that suggested that riboflavin production was indicative of nitrogen fixation in plant bacteria [73]. Though the environments may seem unrelated, plant bacteria have many commonalities to insect bacteria [74], pertinently nitrogen fixation. It is worth noting that only two key enzymatic functions are needed to be up-regulated in Bacillus to overproduce riboflavin [75]. Here, we found two highly expressed riboflavin-producing genes in hemolymph (Table 1, Tables S1, S2, and S3b).
The up-regulation of genes from the pentose pathway (Table S3b) may serve a double role in Dactylopiibacterium. On the one hand, the increased flow in the pentose phosphate pathway would promote riboflavin production [75]—on the other hand, it may contribute to tolerate acid conditions that may be found in hemolymph due to carminic acid. Similarly, in a legume symbiont, the pentose pathway has been implicated in acid tolerance [76].
Since ammonium assimilating genes are found transcribed in Dactylopiibacterium, it seems that it may excrete amino acids instead of ammonium to the host. Genes for aromatic amino acids transport found expressed in hemolymph bacteria suggest that they are the providers of essential amino acids to the host. A spermidine synthase gene was up-regulated in hemolymph (Tables S2 and S3b), and spermidine biosynthesis and transport genes were found in the genome of Sodalis, which is a secondary endosymbiont in the related wax cochineal [77]. Spermidine may contribute to host colonization and has important functions in the bacterium [78]. Furthermore, arginine (that may be synthesized as well from fixed nitrogen) may stimulate spermidine biosynthesis.
We found in Dactylopiibacterium the expression of genes encoding Type IV pili (Tfp) and Type 1 and 2 secretion systems (T1SS and T2SS). In Azoarcus, Tfps are needed for endophytic host colonization in rice roots [79]. Tfp systems have been identified as mechanisms for adhesion, biofilm formation, twitching motility, and DNA uptake in some bacteria [80]. Experiments with Tfp mutants in the honeybee gut symbiont Snodgrassella alvi showed that Tfps are likely used for attachment and biofilm formation on the hindgut epithelium [81]. Transcriptional evidence suggests Tfp are active in Dactylopiibacterium, and could be used for symbiotic motility in the hemolymph and ovary, or adhesion to insect tissues or biofilm formation, as in other bacteria [82]. Additionally, Vibrio cholerae T2SS can secrete proteins that promote attachment to chitin for colonization of zooplankton, or to mucin for colonizing the intestinal epithelia of mammals [83]. In enteropathogenic E. coli, a T2SS secrets a surface lipoprotein for colonization and biofilm formation [84]. This evidence suggests that T2SS could aid Dactylopiibacterium in host colonization.
We do not know the exact location of the flagella, but suggest that Dactylopiibacterium may have a single polar flagellum, as in Azoarcus taiwanensis, which is related to Dactylopiibacterium [85]. Bacterial motility in hemolymph is supported by the high expression of genes for flagellar movement (Figure 4), including genes for the filament, basal body, and motor [86]. In hemolymph, insect cell density is in general low, and dactylopiibacteria may move (as proposed in Salmonella [87]) to reach targets such as ovarioles. Therein (in ovaries), dactylopiibacteria may lose flagella, but could use twitching motility instead.

5. Conclusions

The quite constant ratios of transcript read numbers of genes involved in transcription, translation, and cell division, as well as the ratios of total genes between hemolymph/gut or hemolymph/ovary comparisons lead us to suggest that there were more Dactylopiibacterium cells in hemolymph than in the gut or ovary. In other insects, the number of microbial symbionts may change in different tissues and development stages [88,89]. However, differences in transcript numbers between tissues could be explained, as well by a different metabolic activity of bacteria under these distinct conditions. Further studies to try to quantify dactylopiibacteria inside carmine cochineals are needed.
In plants, nitrogen-fixing endophytes have low numbers in most cases [90,91]. Seemingly Dactylopiibacterium emerged from plant endophytes, and similarly in the cochineals; dactylopiibacteria are low in numbers, especially so in ovaries. Nevertheless, therein only a few cells would be needed to colonize new cochineal generations. In-agreement fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) of Dactylopiibacterium in the ovaries showed low numbers of these bacteria [17]. The low number of transcripts from ovaries preclude a differential gene expression analysis, but clearly support a mother–offspring transfer of Dactylopiibacterium.
Our interpretation of transcriptomic results is that not all genes from a biochemical pathway need to become up-regulated, and the ones that become highly expressed may represent the limiting steps in a process to overproduce some products, as has been described before for the biotechnological production of riboflavin [75].
Transcriptomic results are very useful to generate hypotheses on bacterial physiology, and our study provides clues toward culturing Dactylopiibacterium in the laboratory. The differential expression of transcriptional regulators that we report here would drive a differential expression of Dactylopiibacterium in the gut and hemolymph. Here, we report novel traits that highlight the beneficial role of Dactylopiibacterium in its host and reveal other functions that will be further studied. Altogether, our results support that the primary symbiont in the cochineal is Dactylopiibacterium.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/9/1/4/s1, Figure S1: Heatmap showing expression level of flagellar, pili or chemotaxis genes. Table S1 Expression levels of Dactylopiibacterium genes from different insect tissues. Table S2: Genes differentially expressed with NOISeq analysis. Table S3: Quantitative transcript analysis.

Author Contributions

R.B.-B. did tissue dissections and RNA extraction; R.B.-B. and A.V.-P.d.L. performed the core transcriptome analysis, expression level quantification, and D.E. analyses; J.C.M.-R. and E.M.-R. performed the quantitative analysis; E.M.-R. acquired the funding, assembled the paper, and coordinated the study; M.R. and all the authors discussed and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

Primary support for this research was provided by CONACyT 253116 and PAPIIT IN207718 from UNAM.

Acknowledgments

We thank Benjamin Jahnes, Mauro Degli-Esposti, and Violeta Matus-Acuña for valuable comments on the manuscript. To José Luis Marquina for providing D. coccus. To Alfredo Hernández, Víctor del Moral and Romualdo Zayas for computing support. All bioinformatic analyses were performed on CCG-UNAM servers. R.B.-B. was a Masters student from the Graduate Program in Biochemical Sciences, UNAM with CONACyT 783288 fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest associated with this study that might potentially bias this work.

References

  1. Gullan, P.J.; Kosztarab, M. Adaptations in scale insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1997, 42, 23–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rosenblueth, M.; Martínez-Romero, J.; Ramírez-Puebla, S.T.; Vera-Ponce de León, A.; Rosas-Pérez, T.; Bustamante-Brito, R.; Rincón-Rosales, R.; Martínez-Romero, E. Endosymbiotic microorganisms of scale insects. TIP Revista Especializada en Ciencias Químico-Biológicas 2018, 21, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Campana, M.G.; Robles García, N.M.; Tuross, N. America’s red gold: Multiple lineages of cultivated cochineal in Mexico. Ecol. Evol. 2015, 5, 607–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eisner, T.; Nowicki, S.; Goetz, M.; Meinwald, J. Red cochineal dye (carminic acid): Its role in nature. Science 1980, 208, 1039–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Morrison, J.F. Protection from Beetle-Predation in Cochineal Insects (Dactylopiidae: Homoptera). Master’s Thesis, Master of Science, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, January 1984. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chávez-Moreno, C.K.; Tecante, A.; Casas, A. The Opuntia (Cactaceae) and Dactylopius (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) in Mexico: A historical perspective of use, interaction and distribution. Biodivers. Conserv. 2009, 18, 3337–3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Portillo, L. Origen de Dactylopius coccus Costa (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae): Norte o Sudamérica? Dugesiana 2005, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Van Dam, A.R.; Portillo Martinez, L.; Chavez, A.J.; May, B.P. Range Wide Phylogeography of Dactylopius coccus (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2015, 108, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chávez-Moreno, C.K.; Tecante, A.; Fragoso-Serrano, M.; Pereda-Miranda, R. Metabolic profiling of Dactylopius (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) species pigments by geographical origin and hosts using multivariate data analysis. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, N.; Nobel, P.S. Phloem exudate collected via scale insect stylets for the CAM species Opuntia ficus-indica under current and doubled CO2 concentrations. Ann. Bot. 1995, 75, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lough, T.J.; Lucas, W.J. Integrative plant biology: Role of phloem long-distance macromolecular trafficking. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 203–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aki, T.; Shigyo, M.; Nakano, R.; Yoneyama, T.; Yanagisawa, S. Nano scale proteomics revealed the presence of regulatory proteins including three FT-Like proteins in phloem and xylem saps from rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 767–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, S.; Sun, L.; Kragler, F. The phloem-delivered RNA pool contains small noncoding RNAs and interferes with translation. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rodriguez-Medina, C.; Atkins, C.A.; Mann, A.J.; Jordan, M.E.; Smith, P.M. Macromolecular composition of phloem exudate from white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rodriguez, L.C.; Niemeyer, H.M. Cochineal production: A reviving Precolumbian industry. Athena Rev. 2001, 2, 76–78. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ramírez-Puebla, S.T.; Ormeño-Orrillo, E.; Vera-Ponce de León, A.; Lozano, L.; Sánchez, A.; Rosenblueth, M.; Martínez-Romero, E. Genomes of Candidatus Wolbachia bourtzisii wDacA and Candidatus Wolbachia pipientis wDacB from the Cochineal insect Dactylopius coccus (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). G3 2016, 6, 3343–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vera-Ponce de León, A.; Ormeño-Orrillo, E.; Ramírez-Puebla, S.T.; González-Román, P.; Rosenblueth, M.; Degli Esposti, M.; Martinez, J.; Martínez-Romero, E. Candidatus Dactylopiibacterium carminicum, a nitrogen-fixing symbiont of the cochineal insect Dactylopius coccus (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Dactylopiidae). Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 2237–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vera-Ponce de León, A.; Sanchez-Flores, A.; Rosenblueth, M.; Martínez-Romero, E. Fungal community associated with Dactylopius (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Dactylopiidae) and its role in uric acid metabolism. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ramírez-Puebla, S.T.; Rosenblueth, M.; Chávez-Moreno, C.K.; de Lyra, M.C.; Tecante, A.; Martínez-Romero, E. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Dactylopius (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) and identification of the symbiotic bacteria. Environ. Entomol. 2010, 39, 1178–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hurek, T.; Reinhold-Hurek, B. Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 as a model for nitrogen-fixing grass endophytes. J. Biotechnol. 2003, 106, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. van Borm, S.; Buschinger, A.; Boomsma, J.J.; Billen, J. Tetraponera ants have gut symbionts related to nitrogen-fixing root-nodule bacteria. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2002, 269, 2023–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Behar, A.; Yuval, B.; Jurkevitch, E. Enterobacteria-mediated nitrogen fixation in natural populations of the fruit fly Ceratitis capitata. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2637–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pinto-Tomás, A.A.; Anderson, M.A.; Suen, G.; Stevenson, D.M.; Chu, F.S.; Cleland, W.W.; Weimer, P.J.; Currie, C.R. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in the fungus gardens of leaf-cutter ants. Science 2009, 326, 1120–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Morales-Jiménez, J.; Zúñiga, G.; Villa-Tanaca, L.; Hernández-Rodríguez, C. Bacterial community and nitrogen fixation in the red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Microb. Ecol. 2009, 58, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Morales-Jiménez, J.; Vera-Ponce de León, A.; García-Domínguez, A.; Martínez-Romero, E.; Zúñiga, G.; Hernández-Rodríguez, C. Nitrogen-fixing and uricolytic bacteria associated with the gut of Dendroctonus rhizophagus and Dendroctonus valens (Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Microb. Ecol. 2013, 66, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Desai, M.S.; Brune, A. Bacteroidales ectosymbionts of gut flagellates shape the nitrogen-fixing community in dry-wood termites. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1302–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Guerrero-Castro, J.; Lozano, L.; Sohlenkamp, C. Dissectin the Acid Stress Response of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast grapped-read alignment with Bowtie2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Haas, B.J.; Papanicolaou, A.; Yassour, M.; Grabherr, M.; Blood, P.D.; Bowden, J.; Couger, M.B.; Eccles, D.; Li, B.; Lieber, M.; et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1494–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Carver, T.; Harris, S.R.; Berriman, M.; Parkhill, J.; McQuillan, J.A. Artemis: An integrated plataform for visualization and analysis of high-throughput sequence-based experimental data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tarazona, S.; Furió-Tarí, P.; Turrá, D.; Di Pietro, A.; Nueda, M.J.; Ferrer, A.; Conesa, A. Data quality aware analysis of differential expression in RNA-seq with NOISeq R/Bioc package. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yamada, T.; Letunic, I.; Okuda, S.; Kanehisa, M.; Bork, P. iPath2.0: Interactive pathway explorer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W412–W415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lahortiga, I.; Cox, L. somersault18:24. Grote Markt, Belgium. 2018. Available online: http://www.somersault1824.com/resources/ (accessed on 8 August 2018).
  35. Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yin, Y.; Mao, X.; Yang, J.; Chen, X.; Mao, F.; Xu, Y. DbCAN: A web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dressaire, C.; Moreira, R.N.; Barahona, S.; Alves de Matos, A.P.; Arraiano, C.M. BolA is a transcriptional switch that turns off motility and turns on biofilm development. MBio 2015, 6, e02352-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Soneson, C.; Delorenzi, M. A comparison of methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Costa-Silva, J.; Domingues, D.; Martins Lopes, F. RNA-Seq differential expression analysis: An extendes review and a software tool. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0190152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Goethals, K.; Van Montagu, M.; Holsters, M. Conserved motifs in a divergent nod box of Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 reveal a common structure in promoters regulated by LysR-type proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 1646–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schlaman, H.R.; Okker, R.J.; Lugtenberg, B.J. Regulation of nodulation gene expression by NodD in rhizobia. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 5177–5182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bernier, S.P.; Nguyen, D.T.; Sokol, P.A. A LysR-type transcriptional regulator in Burkholderia cenocepacia influences colony morphology and virulence. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Maddocks, S.E.; Oyston, P.C. Structure and function of the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) family proteins. Microbiology 2008, 154, 3609–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  44. Balakrishnan, L.; Venter, H.; Shilling, R.A.; Veen, H.W. Reversible transport by the ATP-binding cassette multidrug export pump LmrA: ATP synthesis at the expense of downhill ethidium uptake. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 11273–11280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Charles, H.; Heddi, A.; Guillaud, J.; Nardon, C.; Nardon, P. A molecular aspect of symbiotic interactions between the weevil Sitophilus oryzae and its endosymbiotic bacteria: Over-expression of a chaperonin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 239, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fares, M.A.; Moya, A.; Barrio, E. GroEL and the maintenance of bacterial endosymbiosis. TRENDS Genet. 2004, 20, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Poliakov, A.; Russell, C.W.; Ponnala, L.; Hoops, H.J.; Sun, Q.; Douglas, A.E.; van Wijk, K.J. Large-scale label-free quantitative proteomics of the pea aphid-Buchnera symbiosis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2011, 10, M110.007039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fan, Y.; Thompson, J.W.; Dubois, L.G.; Moseley, M.A.; Wernegreen, J.J. Proteomic analysis of an unculturable bacterial endosymbiont (Blochmannia) reveals high abundance of chaperonins and biosynthetic enzymes. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 704–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kühner, S.; van Noort, V.; Betts, M.J.; Leo-Macias, A.; Batisse, C.; Rode, M.; Yamada, T.; Maier, T.; Bader, S.; Beltran-Alvarez, P.; et al. Proteome organization in a genome-reduced bacterium. Science 2009, 326, 1235–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kupper, M.; Gupta, S.K.; Feldhaar, H.; Gross, R. Versatile roles of the chaperonin GroEL in microorganism-insect interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 353, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  51. López-Guerrero, M.G.; Ormeño-Orrillo, E.; Rosenblueth, M.; Martínez-Romero, J.; Martínez-Romero, E. Buffet hypothesis for microbial nutrition at the rhizosphere. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Degli Esposti, M.; Martínez-Romero, E. The functional microbiome of arthropods. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Martin, D.E.; Reinhold-Hurek, B. Distinct roles of P(II)-like signal transmitter proteins and amtB in regulation of nif gene expression, nitrogenase activity, and posttranslational modification of NifH in Azoarcus sp. strain BH72. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 2251–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sickerman, N.S.; Rettberg, L.A.; Lee, C.C.; Hu, Y.; Ribbe, M.W. Cluster assembly in nitrogenase. Essays Biochem. 2017, 61, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kaminski, P.A.; Kitts, CL.; Zimmerman, Z.; Ludwig, R.A. Azorhizobium caulinodans uses both cytochrome bd (quinol) and cytochrome cbb3 (cytochrome c) terminal oxidases for symbiotic N2 fixation. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 5989–5994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dinant, S.; Bonnemain, J.L.; Girousse, C.; Kehr, J. Phloem sap intricacy and interplay with aphid feeding. C. R. Biol. 2010, 333, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  57. Gaille, C.; Reimmann, C.; Haas, D. Isochorismate synthase (PchA), the first and rate-limiting enzyme in salicylate biosynthesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 16893–16898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Skaar, E.P. The Battle for Iron between Bacterial Pathogens and Their Vertebrate Hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Barka, N.; Abdennouri, M.; El Makhfouk, M.; Qourzal, S. Biosorption characteristics of cadmium and lead onto eco-friendly dried cactus (Opuntia ficus indica) cladodes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nharingo, T.; Moyo, M. Application of Opuntia ficus-indica in bioremediation of wastewaters. A critical review. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 166, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Domozych, D.S.; Sørensen, I.; Popper, Z.A.; Ochs, J.; Andreas, A.; Fangel, J.U.; Pielach, A.; Sacks, C.; Brechka, H.; Ruisi-Besares, P.; et al. Pectin Metabolism and Assembly in the Cell Wall of the Charophyte Green Alga Penium margaritaceum. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yapo, B.M. Rhamnogalacturonan-I: A structurally puzzling and functionally versatile polysaccharide from plant cell walls and mucilages. Polym. Rev. 2011, 51, 391–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Azadi, P.; O’Neill, M.A.; Bergmann, C.; Darvill, A.G.; Albersheim, P. The backbone of the pectic polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan I is cleaved by an endohydrolase and an endolyase. Glycobiology 1995, 5, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lefsih, K.; Giacomazza, D.; Passantino, R.; Costa, M.A.; Bulone, D.; Mangione, M.R.; Guarrasi, V.; Mingoia, F.; San Biagio, P.L.; Madani, K. Biochemical and biophysical characterization of water-soluble pectin from Opuntia ficus-indica and its potential cytotoxic activity. Phytochemistry 2018, 154, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ndeh, D.; Rogowski, A.; Cartmell, A.; Luis, A.S.; Baslé, A.; Gray, J.; Venditto, I.; Briggs, J.; Zhang, X.; Labourel, A.; et al. Complex pectin metabolism by gut bacteria reveals novel catalytic functions. Nature 2017, 544, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  66. Engel, P.; Martinson, V.G.; Moran, N.A. Functional diversity within the simple gut microbiota of the honey bee. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11002–11007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. James, V.; Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat, N. Regulatory systems modulating the transcription of the pectinase genes of Erwinia chrysanthemi are conserved in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 1996, 142, 2613–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Reinhold-Hurek, B.; Hurek, T.; Claeyssens, M.; van Montagu, M. Cloning, expression in Escherichia coli, and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes of Azoarcus sp., a root-invading diazotroph. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 7056–7065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Garg, N.; Singla, R. Nitrogen fixation and carbon metabolism in legume nodules. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 42, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Iyer, B.; Rajput, M.S.; Jog, R.; Joshi, E.; Bharwad, K.; Rajkumar, S. Organic acid mediated repression of sugar utilization in rhizobia. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bursell, E. The Role of Proline in Energy Metabolism. In Energy Metabolism in Insects; Downer, R.G.H., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980; pp. 135–154. [Google Scholar]
  72. Phillips, D.A.; Joseph, C.M.; Yang, G.P.; Martinez-Romero, E.; Sanborn, J.R.; Volpin, H. Identification of lumichrome as a sinorhizobium enhancer of alfalfa root respiration and shoot growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 12275–12280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Phillips, D.A.; Martinez-Romero, E.; Yang, G.P.; Joseph, C.M. Release of nitrogen: A key trait in selecting bacterial endophytes for agronomically useful nitrogen fixation. In The Quest for Nitrogen Fixation in Rice; Ladha, J.K., Reddy, P.M., Eds.; IRRI: Laguna, Philippines, 2000; pp. 205–217. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ramírez-Puebla, S.T.; Servín-Garcidueñas, L.E.; Jiménez-Marín, B.; Bolaños, L.M.; Rosenblueth, M.; Martínez, J.; Rogel, M.A.; Ormeño-Orrillo, E.; Martínez-Romero, E. Gut and root microbiota commonalities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hümbelin, M.; Griesser, V.; Keller, T.; Schurter, W.; Haiker, M.; Hohmann, H.P.; Ritz, H.; Richter Bacher, G.A.; van Loon, A.P.G.M. GTP cyclohydrolase II and 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate synthase are rate-limiting enzymes in riboflavin synthesis of an industrial Bacillus subtilis strain used for riboflavin production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 22, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Draghi, W.O.; Del Papa, M.F.; Hellweg, C.; Watt, S.A.; Watt, T.F.; Barsch, A.; Lozano, M.J.; Lagares, A., Jr.; Salas, M.E.; López, J.L.; et al. A consolidated analysis of the physiologic and molecular responses induced under acid stress in the legume-symbiont model-soil bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rosas-Pérez, T.; Vera-Ponce de León, A.; Rosenblueth, M.; Ramírez-Puebla, S.T.; Rincón-Rosales, R.; Martínez-Romero, J.; Dunn, M.F.; Kondorosi, E.; Martínez-Romero, E. Chapter 5. The Symbiome of Llaveia cochineals (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Monophlebidae) includes a Gammaproteobacterial cosymbiont Sodalis TME1 and the known Candidatus Walczuchella monophlebidarum. In Agricultural and Biological Sciences "Insect Physiology and Ecology"; Shields, V.D.C., Ed.; InTech: Pleasanton, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 115–134. [Google Scholar]
  78. Jelsbak, L.; Thomsen, L.E.; Wallrodt, I.; Jensen, P.R.; Olsen, J.E. Polyamines are required for virulence in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Böhm, M.; Hurek, T.; Reinhold-Hurek, B. Twitching motility is essential for endophytic rice colonization by the N2-fixing endophyte Azoarcus sp. strain BH72. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 526–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Pelicic, V. Type IV pili: E pluribus unum? Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Powell, J.E.; Leonard, S.P.; Kwong, W.K.; Engel, P.; Moran, N.A. Genome-wide screen identifies host colonization determinants in a bacterial gut symbiont. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 13887–13892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cianciotto, N.P.; White, R.C. Expanding role of type II secretion in bacterial pathogenesis and beyond. Infect Immun. 2017, 85, e00014-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wong, E.; Vaaje-Kolstad, G.; Ghosh, A.; Hurtado-Guerrero, R.; Konarev, P.V.; Ibrahim, A.F.; Svergun, D.I.; Eijsink, V.G.; Chatterjee, N.S.; van Aalten, D.M. The Vibrio cholerae colonization factor GbpA possesses a modular structure that governs binding to different host surfaces. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Baldi, D.; Higginson, E.; Hocking, D.; Praszkier, J.; Cavaliere, R.; James, C.; Bennett-Wood, V.; Azzopardi, K.; Turnbull, L.; Lithgow, T.; et al. The type II secretion system and its ubiquitous lipoprotein substrate, SslE, are required for biofilm formation and virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 2042–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lee, D.J.; Wong, B.T.; Adav, S.S. Azoarcus taiwanensis sp. nov., a denitrifying species isolated from a hot spring. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 1301–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Macnab, R.M. How bacteria assemble flagella. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003, 57, 77–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sano, G.; Takada, Y.; Goto, S.; Maruyama, K.; Shindo, Y.; Oka, K.; Matsui, H.; Matsuo, K. Flagella facilitate escape of Salmonella from oncotic macrophages. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 8224–8232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Masson, F.; Zaidman-Rémy, A.; Heddi, A. Antimicrobial peptides and cell processes tracking endosymbiont dynamics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 20150298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  89. Vigneron, A.; Masson, F.; Vallier, A.; Balmand, S.; Rey, M.; Vincent-Monégat, C.; Aksoy, E.; Aubailly-Giraud, E.; Zaidman-Rémy, A.; Heddi, A. Insects recycle endosymbionts when the benefit is over. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 2267–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Barraquio, W.L.; Revilla, L.; Ladha, J.K. Isolation of endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from wetland rice. Plant Soil 1997, 194, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Martínez, L.; Caballero, J.; Orozco, J.; Martínez-Romero, E. Diazotrophic bacteria associated with banana (Musa spp.). Plant Soil 2003, 257, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dorsal view of female second instar nymph of Dactylopius coccus with wax removed with 96% ethanol.
Figure 1. Dorsal view of female second instar nymph of Dactylopius coccus with wax removed with 96% ethanol.
Life 09 00004 g001
Figure 2. Number of Dactylopiibacterium expressed transcripts in different Dactylopius tissues. Reads were mapped to Dactylopiibacterium NFE1 reference genome.
Figure 2. Number of Dactylopiibacterium expressed transcripts in different Dactylopius tissues. Reads were mapped to Dactylopiibacterium NFE1 reference genome.
Life 09 00004 g002
Figure 3. Predicted metabolism and cellular features of Dactylopiibacterium in the insect host (Dactylopius). Red boxes represent expressed metabolism genes in the gut and hemolymph.
Figure 3. Predicted metabolism and cellular features of Dactylopiibacterium in the insect host (Dactylopius). Red boxes represent expressed metabolism genes in the gut and hemolymph.
Life 09 00004 g003
Figure 4. Flagellar and secretion systems expressed by Dactylopiibacterium in their insect host. (a) Heat map showing the average expression level of Dactylopiibacterium genes for flagellar production and motility in Dactylopius. (b) Flagellar diagram showing the expression (highlighted) of different flagellar components by Dactylopiibacterium in different insect tissues. (c) Heat map showing the average expression level of Dactylopiibacterium genes for secretion systems 1 and 2 in Dactylopius. (d) Bacterial secretion system diagram showing the expression (highlighted) of different Dactylopiibacterium genes for SS1 and SS2 in different insect tissues.
Figure 4. Flagellar and secretion systems expressed by Dactylopiibacterium in their insect host. (a) Heat map showing the average expression level of Dactylopiibacterium genes for flagellar production and motility in Dactylopius. (b) Flagellar diagram showing the expression (highlighted) of different flagellar components by Dactylopiibacterium in different insect tissues. (c) Heat map showing the average expression level of Dactylopiibacterium genes for secretion systems 1 and 2 in Dactylopius. (d) Bacterial secretion system diagram showing the expression (highlighted) of different Dactylopiibacterium genes for SS1 and SS2 in different insect tissues.
Life 09 00004 g004
Figure 5. Expressed CAZymes and metabolic genes involved in pectin and rhamnogalacturonan metabolism of Dactylopiibacterium in the insect gut.
Figure 5. Expressed CAZymes and metabolic genes involved in pectin and rhamnogalacturonan metabolism of Dactylopiibacterium in the insect gut.
Life 09 00004 g005
Figure 6. Illustrative proposed functional markers depicting Dactylopiibacterium differentially expression in different tissues: in blue, from the quantitative analysis; in red, from NOISeq; and in black, from both analyses.
Figure 6. Illustrative proposed functional markers depicting Dactylopiibacterium differentially expression in different tissues: in blue, from the quantitative analysis; in red, from NOISeq; and in black, from both analyses.
Life 09 00004 g006
Table 1. Top differentially expressed genes.
Table 1. Top differentially expressed genes.
Protein IDLog2FCCOGFunction
Up-regulated in Gut
WP_095525391.14.10NAHypothetical protein
WP_095523710.13.51COG2081Aminoacetone oxidase family FAD-binding enzyme
WP_095525172.13.50COG0300Short-chain dehydrogenase
WP_095525875.3.17COG0583LysR family transcriptional regulator
WP_095523466.13.04COG2382Hypothetical protein
WP_095525673.13.01NAHypothetical protein
WP_095525264.12.98COG0643Chemotaxis protein CheA
WP_095524233.12.80NAHypothetical protein
WP_095525304.12.76COG2199Hypothetical protein
WP_095523625.12.67COG3419Pilus assembly protein
WP_095524852.12.65COG3895Hypothetical protein
WP_095526008.12.60COG3549Exonuclease ABC subunit A
WP_095523085.12.58COG0523Cobalamin biosynthesis protein CobW
WP_095523064.12.57COG0845Multidrug transporter subunit MdtA
WP_095524897.12.56COG2230SAM-dependent methylytransferase
Up-regulated in Hemolymph
WP_095525565.13.18NAHypothetical protein
WP_095525317.12.52COG0120Ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A
WP_095523550.12.47COG1702Phosphate starvation-inducible protein PhoH
WP_095525561.12.41NAHypothetical protein
WP_095523253.12.39COG0837Glucokinase
WP_095525928.12.36COG0171NAD+ synthase
WP_095523935.12.31COG1354Segregation/condensation protein A
WP_095522941.2.13COG0424Septum formation inhibitor Maf
WP_095523049.12.11COG2200Hypothetical protein
WP_095525579.12.11COG0848Biopolymer transporter ExbD
WP_095525717.2.09NAThioredoxin
WP_095526004.12.08NAHypothetical protein
WP_095524367.12.08COG1391Bifunctional [glutamate-amonia ligase]-Adenylyl-l-tyrosine phosphorylase/[glutamate-ammonia-ligase] adenylyltransferase
WP_095523236.12.06COG2010Cytochrome C
WP_095524731.12.05NAGNAT family N-acetyltransferase
NA = No assignation recovered.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Life EISSN 2075-1729 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top