Artificial Intelligence Enabled Diagnostics Using Photoplethysmography (PPG): Beyond SpO2 and Heart Rate
Abstract
1. Introduction
Photoplethysmography Data Acquisition and Analysis
2. Role of AI in Interpreting PPG Signals
2.1. Preprocessing of Signals and Noise Reduction Techniques
2.2. Feature Extraction and Representation
2.3. Personalized and Population-Level Modeling
2.4. Practical Processing of PPG Signals for AI
3. Blood Pressure Estimation Using PPG Through A.I. Models and Pulse Transit Time Fusion for Clinical Application
4. Atrial Fibrillation Detection Using AI-Enabled PPG
4.1. Morphological and Rhythm-Based Detection via PPG
4.2. Contactless PPG Methods
4.3. Deep Learning vs. Classical Classifiers
4.4. Continuous Monitoring via Wearable Devices
4.5. Differentiating AFib from Noise and Other Arrhythmias
4.6. FDA-Cleared Technologies and Ongoing Research
5. Multimodal AI Framework for Home-Based Sleep Apnea Detection Using PPG-Derived Respiratory Signals, Actigraphy, and Sleep Stage Estimation
5.1. Introduction Clinical Need and Rationale for Multimodal Home-Based OSA Detection
5.2. PPG-Derived Respiratory Waveforms and Variability
5.2.1. AI (Convolutional Neural Network) Analysis of Nocturnal Pulse Patterns and Desaturation Events
5.2.2. Integration with Actigraphy and Sleep-Stage Estimation
5.2.3. Performance Against Polysomnography
5.2.4. Prospects in Home-Based Sleep Diagnostics
6. Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment via AI-Enabled PPG
7. Arterial Stiffness and Vascular Aging
8. Pre-Eclampsia Prediction via AI-Enhanced Photoplethysmography
9. Portal Hypertension Prediction Using Photoplethysmography
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Pathophysiological Basis of Portal Hypertension
9.3. The Need for Non-Invasive Evaluation
9.4. Photoplethysmography for Volume Status Assessment in Cirrhosis: A Potential Tool for Portal Hypertension Monitoring
9.5. Photoplethysmographic Amplitude-to-Pulse Pressure Ratio as a Marker of Vascular Compliance in Circulatory Dysregulation
9.6. Imaging Photoplethysmography (iPPG): Real-Time Perfusion Mapping
9.7. Potential Role and Future Directions for PPG-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring
10. PPG Waveforms, CRI, and Non-Invasive Measures of Hemodynamic Stability
10.1. Introduction
10.2. CRI Reflects Compensatory Mechanisms During Hypovolemia Using PPG Waveform Features
10.3. CRI in Hemorrhage and Trauma (LBNP Models and Clinical Studies)
10.4. Use in Dengue Shock and Appendicitis to Detect Severity and Monitor Response
10.5. Correlation with Gold Standards: Stroke Volume, Vascular Compliance, and Total Peripheral Resistance
10.6. Potential for Real-Time CRI Monitoring via AI-Enhanced Wearable Pulse Oximeters
11. Challenges and Future Directions for PPG in Medicine
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Technical and Signal-Quality Challenges
11.2.1. Motion Artifact
11.2.2. Site, Contact Pressure, Pigmentation, and Perfusion
11.2.3. Physiological Confounders and Interpretability
11.3. Data Standards and Validation
11.4. Clinical and Regulatory Integration
11.5. Emerging and Potential Clinical Applications
11.5.1. Pulmonary Hypertension (PH)
11.5.2. Pregnancy and Pre-Eclampsia
11.5.3. Diabetes and Glucose Monitoring
11.5.4. Hormonal Biomarkers
11.6. Standardization Challenges
12. Future Directions
13. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PPG | Photoplethysmography |
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| ML | Machine Learning |
| DL | Deep Learning |
| ECG | Electrocardiography |
| BP | Blood Pressure |
| AFib | Atrial Fibrillation |
| OSA | Obstructive Sleep Apnea |
| PH | Pulmonary Hypertension |
| HVPG | Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient |
| CRI | Compensatory Reserve Index |
| CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
| LSTM | Long Short-Term Memory |
| PTT | Pulse Transit Time |
| HRV | Heart Rate Variability |
| PSG | Polysomnography |
| PWA | Pulse Wave Analysis |
References
- Allen, J. Photoplethysmography and Its Application in Clinical Physiological Measurement. Physiol. Meas. 2007, 28, R1–R39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tamura, T. Current Progress of Photoplethysmography and SPO2 for Health Monitoring. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 2019, 9, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Elgendi, M. On the Analysis of Fingertip Photoplethysmogram Signals. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2012, 8, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rovas, G.; Bikia, V.; Stergiopulos, N. Quantification of the Phenomena Affecting Reflective Arterial Photoplethysmography. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lee, H.; Ko, H.; Thap, T.; Lee, J. Multiple Switching Light Sources Based Motion Artifacts Reduction in Reflectance Photoplethysmography. In Proceedings of the 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 3398–3401. [Google Scholar]
- Rajpurkar, P.; Chen, E.; Banerjee, O.; Topol, E.J. AI in Health and Medicine. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Manetas-Stavrakakis, N.; Sotiropoulou, I.M.; Paraskevas, T.; Maneta Stavrakaki, S.; Bampatsias, D.; Xanthopoulos, A.; Papageorgiou, N.; Briasoulis, A. Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Technologies for the Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ward, R.; Elgendi, M. Photoplethysmography and Deep Learning: Enhancing Hypertension Risk Stratification. Biosensors 2018, 8, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Slapničar, G.; Mlakar, N.; Luštrek, M. Blood Pressure Estimation from Photoplethysmogram Using a Spectro-Temporal Deep Neural Network. Sensors 2019, 19, 3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Loh, H.W.; Xu, S.; Faust, O.; Ooi, C.P.; Barua, P.D.; Chakraborty, S.; Tan, R.-S.; Molinari, F.; Acharya, U.R. Application of Photoplethysmography Signals for Healthcare Systems: An in-Depth Review. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2022, 216, 106677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Goodfellow, I.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A.; Bengio, Y. Deep Learning; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; ISBN 9780262035613. [Google Scholar]
- Shashikumar, S.P.; Li, Q.; Clifford, G.D.; Nemati, S. Multiscale Network Representation of Physiological Time Series for Early Prediction of Sepsis. Physiol. Meas. 2017, 38, 2235–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Vaswani, A.; Brain, G.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A.N.; Kaiser, Ł.; Polosukhin, I. Attention Is All You Need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2017, 30. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q.; Zhou, D.; Zeng, X. HeartID: A Multiresolution Convolutional Neural Network for ECG-Based Biometric Human Identification in Smart Health Applications. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 11805–11816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Forouzanfar, M.H.; Liu, P.; Roth, G.A.; Ng, M.; Biryukov, S.; Marczak, L.; Alexander, L.; Estep, K.; Hassen Abate, K.; Akinyemiju, T.F.; et al. Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 Mm Hg, 1990–2015. JAMA 2017, 317, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mukkamala, R.; Hahn, J.-O.; Inan, O.T.; Mestha, L.K.; Kim, C.-S.; Toreyin, H.; Kyal, S. Toward Ubiquitous Blood Pressure Monitoring via Pulse Transit Time: Theory and Practice. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 62, 1879–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kachuee, M.; Kiani, M.M.; Mohammadzade, H.; Shabany, M. Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Algorithms for Continuous Health-Care Monitoring. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 64, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, S.; Luo, H.; Yao, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, X.; Liu, H. Intrinsic PPG–ECG Coupling for Accurate and Low-Power Blood Pressure Monitoring. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e20101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Stergiou, G.S.; Alpert, B.S.; Mieke, S.; Wang, J.; O’Brien, E. Validation Protocols for Blood Pressure Measuring Devices in the 21st Century. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2018, 20, 1096–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Avolio, A.; Cox, J.; Louka, K.; Shirbani, F.; Tan, I.; Qasem, A.; Butlin, M. Challenges Presented by Cuffless Measurement of Blood Pressure If Adopted for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension. Pulse 2022, 10, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mahmud, S.; Ibtehaz, N.; Khandakar, A.; Tahir, A.M.; Rahman, T.; Islam, K.R.; Hossain, M.S.; Rahman, M.S.; Musharavati, F.; Ayari, M.A.; et al. A Shallow U-Net Architecture for Reliably Predicting Blood Pressure (BP) from Photoplethysmogram (PPG) and Electrocardiogram (ECG) Signals. Sensors 2022, 22, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yousefian, P.; Shin, S.; Mousavi, A.S.; Tivay, A.; Kim, C.-S.; Mukkamala, R.; Jang, D.-G.; Ko, B.H.; Lee, J.; Kwon, U.-K.; et al. Pulse Transit Time-Pulse Wave Analysis Fusion Based on Wearable Wrist Ballistocardiogram for Cuff-Less Blood Pressure Trend Tracking. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 138077–138087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Arjomand, A.; Boudesh, A.; Bayatmakou, F.; Krylov, G.; Kent, K.; Mohammadi, A. Transforhythm: A Transformer Architecture Conductive to Blood Pressure Estimation Through Solo Ppg Signal Capturing. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.15352. [Google Scholar]
- Haque, R.; Wang, C.; Pala, N. An Ensemble-Based AI Approach for Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation in Health Monitoring Applications. Sensors 2025, 25, 4574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- UEN, S.; WEISSER, B.; WIENEKE, P.; VETTER, H.; MENGDEN, T. Evaluation of the Performance of a Wrist Blood Pressure Measuring Device with a Position Sensor Compared to Ambulatory 24-Hour Blood Pressure Measurements. Am. J. Hypertens. 2002, 15, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Samimi, H.; Dajani, H.R. A PPG-Based Calibration-Free Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Method Using Cardiovascular Dynamics. Sensors 2023, 23, 4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, Z.; Zhou, B.; Li, Y.; Tang, M.; Miao, F. Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation From Electrocardiogram and Photoplethysmogram During Arrhythmias. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 575407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. Hypertension; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, B.P.; Lai, W.H.S.; Chan, C.K.Y.; Chan, S.C.; Chan, L.; Lam, K.; Lau, H.; Ng, C.; Tai, L.; Yip, K.; et al. Contact-Free Screening of Atrial Fibrillation by a Smartphone Using Facial Pulsatile Photoplethysmographic Signals. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Temko, A. Estimation of Heart Rate from Photoplethysmography during Physical Exercise Using Wiener Filtering and the Phase Vocoder. In Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1500–1503. [Google Scholar]
- Verkruysse, W.; Svaasand, L.O.; Nelson, J.S. Remote Plethysmographic Imaging Using Ambient Light. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 21434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Poh, M.-Z.; McDuff, D.J.; Picard, R.W. Non-Contact, Automated Cardiac Pulse Measurements Using Video Imaging and Blind Source Separation. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 10762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Talukdar, D.; De Deus, L.F.; Sehgal, N. Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Short-Term Photoplethysmography (PPG) Signals Using Artificial Intelligence. Cureus 2023, 15, e45111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Antiperovitch, P.; Mortara, D.; Barrios, J.; Avram, R.; Yee, K.; Khaless, A.N.; Cristal, A.; Tison, G.; Olgin, J. Continuous Atrial Fibrillation Monitoring From Photoplethysmography. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2024, 10, 334–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Guo, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, T.; Liang, Z.; Xia, Y.; Yan, L.; Xing, Y.; Shi, H.; Li, S.; et al. Mobile Photoplethysmographic Technology to Detect Atrial Fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 74, 2365–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tison, G.H.; Sanchez, J.M.; Ballinger, B.; Singh, A.; Olgin, J.E.; Pletcher, M.J.; Vittinghoff, E.; Lee, E.S.; Fan, S.M.; Gladstone, R.A.; et al. Passive Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Commercially Available Smartwatch. JAMA Cardiol. 2018, 3, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Perez, M.V.; Mahaffey, K.W.; Hedlin, H.; Rumsfeld, J.S.; Garcia, A.; Ferris, T.; Balasubramanian, V.; Russo, A.M.; Rajmane, A.; Cheung, L.; et al. Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1909–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- May, J.; Malkani, R.G. Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Curr. Pulmonol. Rep. 2024, 13, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jiang, X.; Ren, Y.; Wu, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, F. Convolutional Neural Network Based on Photoplethysmography Signals for Sleep Apnea Syndrome Detection. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1222715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kotzen, K.; Charlton, P.H.; Salabi, S.; Amar, L.; Landesberg, A.; Behar, J.A. SleepPPG-Net: A Deep Learning Algorithm for Robust Sleep Staging From Continuous Photoplethysmography. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2023, 27, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Smith, M.T.; McCrae, C.S.; Cheung, J.; Martin, J.L.; Harrod, C.G.; Heald, J.L.; Carden, K.A. Use of Actigraphy for the Evaluation of Sleep Disorders and Circadian Rhythm Sleep-Wake Disorders: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2018, 14, 1209–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sadeh, A.; Acebo, C. The Role of Actigraphy in Sleep Medicine. Sleep Med. Rev. 2002, 6, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hedner, J.; Pillar, G.; Pittman, S.D.; Zou, D.; Grote, L.; White, D.P. A Novel Adaptive Wrist Actigraphy Algorithm for Sleep-Wake Assessment in Sleep Apnea Patients. Sleep 2004, 27, 1560–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Charlton, P.H.; Bonnici, T.; Tarassenko, L.; Alastruey, J.; Clifton, D.A.; Beale, R.; Watkinson, P.J. Extraction of Respiratory Signals from the Electrocardiogram and Photoplethysmogram: Technical and Physiological Determinants. Physiol. Meas. 2017, 38, 669–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Meredith, D.J.; Clifton, D.; Charlton, P.; Brooks, J.; Pugh, C.W.; Tarassenko, L. Photoplethysmographic Derivation of Respiratory Rate: A Review of Relevant Physiology. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2012, 36, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Karlen, W.; Raman, S.; Ansermino, J.M.; Dumont, G.A. Multiparameter Respiratory Rate Estimation From the Photoplethysmogram. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 60, 1946–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Nilsson, L.M. Respiration Signals from Photoplethysmography. Anesth. Analg. 2013, 117, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Morgenthaler, T.; Alessi, C.; Friedman, L.; Owens, J.; Kapur, V.; Boehlecke, B.; Brown, T.; Chesson, A.; Coleman, J.; Lee-Chiong, T.; et al. Practice Parameters for the Use of Actigraphy in the Assessment of Sleep and Sleep Disorders: An Update for 2007. Sleep 2007, 30, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gil, E.; Orini, M.; Bailón, R.; Vergara, J.M.; Mainardi, L.; Laguna, P. Photoplethysmography Pulse Rate Variability as a Surrogate Measurement of Heart Rate Variability during Non-Stationary Conditions. Physiol. Meas. 2010, 31, 1271–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, Q.; Li, Q.; Cakmak, A.S.; Da Poian, G.; Bliwise, D.L.; Vaccarino, V.; Shah, A.J.; Clifford, G.D. Transfer Learning from ECG to PPG for Improved Sleep Staging from Wrist-Worn Wearables. Physiol. Meas. 2021, 42, 044004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kapur, V.K.; Auckley, D.H.; Chowdhuri, S.; Kuhlmann, D.C.; Mehra, R.; Ramar, K.; Harrod, C.G. Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 2017, 13, 479–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Choksatchawathi, T.; Sawadwuthikul, G.; Thuwajit, P.; Kaewlee, T.; Mateepithaktham, T.; Saisaard, S.; Sudhawiyangkul, T.; Chaitusaney, B.; Saengmolee, W.; Wilaiprasitporn, T. ApSense: Data-Driven Algorithm in PPG-Based Sleep Apnea Sensing. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 33915–33926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Attaripour Esfahani, S.; Baba Ali, N.; Farina, J.M.; Scalia, I.G.; Pereyra, M.; Abbas, M.T.; Javadi, N.; Bismee, N.N.; Abdelfattah, F.E.; Awad, K.; et al. A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications in Pulmonary Hypertension (PH). Medicina 2025, 61, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Scholte, N.T.B.; van Ravensberg, A.E.; Edgar, R.; van den Enden, A.J.M.; van Mieghem, N.M.D.A.; Brugts, J.J.; Bonnes, J.L.; Bruining, N.; van der Boon, R.M.A. Photoplethysmography and Intracardiac Pressures: Early Insights from a Pilot Study. Eur. Heart J.-Digit. Health 2024, 5, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fadilah, A.; Putri, V.Y.S.; Puling, I.M.D.R.; Willyanto, S.E. Assessing the Precision of Machine Learning for Diagnosing Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 11, 1422327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Q.; Ma, P. Classification of Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Using Photoplethysmography and Bi-Directional LSTM. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2023, 86, 105071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nemati, N.; Burton, T.; Fathieh, F.; Gillins, H.R.; Shadforth, I.; Ramchandani, S.; Bridges, C.R. Pulmonary Hypertension Detection Non-Invasively at Point-of-Care Using a Machine-Learned Algorithm. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- McLean, D.; Rommel, J.; Steuter, J.A.; Carroll, W.S.; Rabbat, M.; Rajagopal, S.; Srinivasan, V.; Kereiakes, D.J.; Roberts, M.C.; Raval, A.; et al. Clinical Validation of a Machine-Learned, Point-of-Care System to IDENTIFY Pulmonary Hypertension. ERJ Open Res. 2025, 11, 01287–02024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shin, H.; Noh, G.; Choi, B.-M. Photoplethysmogram Based Vascular Aging Assessment Using the Deep Convolutional Neural Network. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chiarelli, A.M.; Bianco, F.; Perpetuini, D.; Bucciarelli, V.; Filippini, C.; Cardone, D.; Zappasodi, F.; Gallina, S.; Merla, A. Data-Driven Assessment of Cardiovascular Ageing through Multisite Photoplethysmography and Electrocardiography. Med. Eng. Phys. 2019, 73, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jakarbet, U.P.; Khan, A.A.; Sumathi, R.; BP, A. Smartphone-Based Photoplethysmography: A Signal Processing Approach for Low-Cost Cardiovascular Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2025 Third International Conference on Networks, Multimedia and Information Technology (NMITCON); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2025; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Cecelja, M.; Ruijsink, B.; Puyol-Antón, E.; Li, Y.; Godwin, H.; King, A.P.; Razavi, R.; Chowienczyk, P. Aortic Distensibility Measured by Automated Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Adverse Cardiovascular Events in UK Biobank. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e026361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Huttunen, J.M.J.; Kärkkäinen, L.; Lindholm, H. Pulse Transit Time Estimation of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity and Blood Pressure Using Machine Learning and Simulated Training Data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2019, 15, e1007259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Euliano, T.Y.; Michalopoulos, K.; Singh, S.; Gregg, A.R.; Del Rio, M.; Vasilopoulos, T.; Johnson, A.M.; Onkala, A.; Darmanjian, S.; Euliano, N.R.; et al. Photoplethysmography and Heart Rate Variability for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia. Anesth. Analg. 2018, 126, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, H.; Jiang, F.; Chen, W.; Feng, Y.; Chen, S.; Miao, J.; Jiao, C.; Chen, X. Distinguishing Preeclampsia Using the Falling Scaled Slope (FSS)—A Novel Photoplethysmographic Morphological Parameter. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2023, 42, 2225617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Munyao, M.M.; Maina, E.M.; Mambo, S.M.; Wanyoro, A. Real-Time Pre-Eclampsia Prediction Model Based on IoT and Machine Learning. Discov. Internet Things 2024, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Butler, L.; Gunturkun, F.; Chinthala, L.; Karabayir, I.; Tootooni, M.S.; Bakir-Batu, B.; Celik, T.; Akbilgic, O.; Davis, R.L. AI-Based Preeclampsia Detection and Prediction with Electrocardiogram Data. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 11, 1360238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- De Kat, A.C.; Hirst, J.; Woodward, M.; Kennedy, S.; Peters, S.A. Prediction Models for Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019, 16, 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Snowdon, V.K.; Guha, N.; Fallowfield, J.A. Noninvasive Evaluation of Portal Hypertension: Emerging Tools and Techniques. Int. J. Hepatol. 2012, 2012, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Xu, G.; Li, F.; Mao, Y. Portal Pressure Monitoring—State-of-the-Art and Future Perspective. Ann. Transl. Med. 2019, 7, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mazumder, N.R.; Kazen, A.; Carek, A.; Etemadi, M.; Levitsky, J. The Answer at Our Fingertips: Volume Status in Cirrhosis Determined by Machine Learning and Pulse Oximeter Waveform. Physiol. Rep. 2022, 10, e15223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kim, W.-J.; Kim, J.-W.; Moon, Y.-J.; Kim, S.-H.; Hwang, G.-S.; Shin, W.-J. The Photoplethysmographic Amplitude to Pulse Pressure Ratio Can Track Sudden Changes in Vascular Compliance and Resistance during Liver Graft Reperfusion. Medicine 2017, 96, e7045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kamshilin, A.A.; Zaytsev, V.V.; Lodygin, A.V.; Kashchenko, V.A. Imaging Photoplethysmography as an Easy-to-Use Tool for Monitoring Changes in Tissue Blood Perfusion during Abdominal Surgery. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Convertino, V.A.; Grudic, G.; Mulligan, J.; Moulton, S. Estimation of Individual-Specific Progression to Impending Cardiovascular Instability Using Arterial Waveforms. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 115, 1196–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Roden, R.T.; Webb, K.L.; Pruter, W.W.; Gorman, E.K.; Holmes, D.R.; Haider, C.R.; Joyner, M.J.; Curry, T.B.; Wiggins, C.C.; Convertino, V.A. Physiologic Validation of the Compensatory Reserve Metric Obtained from Pulse Oximetry: A Step toward Advanced Medical Monitoring on the Battlefield. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024, 97, S98–S104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Convertino, V.A.; Schauer, S.G.; Weitzel, E.K.; Cardin, S.; Stackle, M.E.; Talley, M.J.; Sawka, M.N.; Inan, O.T. Wearable Sensors Incorporating Compensatory Reserve Measurement for Advancing Physiological Monitoring in Critically Injured Trauma Patients. Sensors 2020, 20, 6413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Convertino, V.A.; Techentin, R.W.; Poole, R.J.; Dacy, A.C.; Carlson, A.N.; Cardin, S.; Haider, C.R.; Holmes, D.R., III; Wiggins, C.C.; Joyner, M.J.; et al. AI-Enabled Advanced Development for Assessing Low Circulating Blood Volume for Emergency Medical Care: Comparison of Compensatory Reserve Machine-Learning Algorithms. Sensors 2022, 22, 2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Latimer, A.J.; Counts, C.R.; Van Dyke, M.; Bulger, N.; Maynard, C.; Rea, T.D.; Kudenchuk, P.J.; Utarnachitt, R.B.; Blackwood, J.; Poel, A.J.; et al. THE COMPENSATORY RESERVE INDEX FOR PREDICTING HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK IN PREHOSPITAL TRAUMA. Shock 2023, 60, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bedolla, C.N.; Gonzalez, J.M.; Vega, S.J.; Convertino, V.A.; Snider, E.J. An Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Compensatory Reserve Measurement: Methods for Feature Selection and the Effects of Subject Variability. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Johnson, M.C.; Alarhayem, A.; Convertino, V.; Carter, R.; Chung, K.; Stewart, R.; Myers, J.; Dent, D.; Liao, L.; Cestero, R.; et al. Compensatory Reserve Index: Performance of A Novel Monitoring Technology to Identify the Bleeding Trauma Patient. Shock 2018, 49, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Trieu, H.T.; Khanh, L.P.; Ming, D.K.Y.; Quang, C.H.; Phan, T.Q.; Van, V.C.N.; Deniz, E.; Mulligan, J.; Wills, B.A.; Moulton, S.; et al. The Compensatory Reserve Index Predicts Recurrent Shock in Patients with Severe Dengue. BMC Med. 2022, 20, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, M.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, G. Removal of Motion Artifacts in Photoplethysmograph Sensors during Intensive Exercise for Accurate Heart Rate Calculation Based on Frequency Estimation and Notch Filtering. Sensors 2019, 19, 3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Maeda, Y.; Sekine, M.; Tamura, T. Relationship Between Measurement Site and Motion Artifacts in Wearable Reflected Photoplethysmography. J. Med. Syst. 2011, 35, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sjoding, M.W.; Dickson, R.P.; Iwashyna, T.J.; Gay, S.E.; Valley, T.S. Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry Measurement. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2477–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lee, J.; Kim, M.; Park, H.-K.; Kim, I.Y. Motion Artifact Reduction in Wearable Photoplethysmography Based on Multi-Channel Sensors with Multiple Wavelengths. Sensors 2020, 20, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Boonya-ananta, T.; Rodriguez, A.J.; Ajmal, A.; Du Le, V.N.; Hansen, A.K.; Hutcheson, J.D.; Ramella-Roman, J.C. Synthetic Photoplethysmography (PPG) of the Radial Artery through Parallelized Monte Carlo and Its Correlation to Body Mass Index (BMI). Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Azimi, I.; Kazemi, K.; Rahmani, A.M.; Liljeberg, P. PPG Signal Reconstruction Using Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network. In Proceedings of the 2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 3387–3391. [Google Scholar]
- González, S.; Hsieh, W.-T.; Chen, T.P.-C. A Benchmark for Machine-Learning Based Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Estimation Using Photoplethysmogram. Sci. Data 2023, 10, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wu, C.; Cai, P.; Zhong, Z.; Zheng, Y. Tiny-PPG: A Lightweight Deep Neural Network for Real-Time Detection of Motion Artifacts in Photoplethysmogram Signals on Edge Devices. Internet Things 2024, 25, 101007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Elgendi, M.; Haugg, F.; Fletcher, R.R.; Allen, J.; Shin, H.; Alian, A.; Menon, C. Recommendations for Evaluating Photoplethysmography-Based Algorithms for Blood Pressure Assessment. Commun. Med. 2024, 4, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, W.; Mohseni, P.; Kilgore, K.L.; Najafizadeh, L. PulseDB: A Large, Cleaned Dataset Based on MIMIC-III and VitalDB for Benchmarking Cuff-Less Blood Pressure Estimation Methods. Front. Digit. Health 2023, 4, 1090854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Petek, B.J.; Al-Alusi, M.A.; Moulson, N.; Grant, A.J.; Besson, C.; Guseh, J.S.; Wasfy, M.M.; Gremeaux, V.; Churchill, T.W.; Baggish, A.L. Consumer Wearable Health and Fitness Technology in Cardiovascular Medicine. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2023, 82, 245–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hughes, A.; Shandhi, M.M.H.; Master, H.; Dunn, J.; Brittain, E. Wearable Devices in Cardiovascular Medicine. Circ. Res. 2023, 132, 652–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kyriacou, P.A. Standardizing Photoplethysmography (PPG) for Clinical-Grade Wearable Sensing. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2026, 127, 110991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bautista, M.J.; Kowal, M.; Cave, D.G.W.; Downey, C.; Jayne, D.G. Clinical Applications of Contactless Photoplethysmography for Monitoring in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2023, 7, e129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shahrbabaki, S.S.; Liu, X.; Baumert, M. Finger Pulse Plethysmography Predicts Gestational Hypertension, Preeclampsia and Gestational Diabetes. J. Hypertens. 2024, 42, 1615–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sana, F.; Isselbacher, E.M.; Singh, J.P.; Heist, E.K.; Pathik, B.; Armoundas, A.A. Wearable Devices for Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 1582–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Harris, C.; Nnadi, B.; Rapuri, S.; Rattray, J.; Tenore, F.; Etienne-Cummings, R.; Stevens, R.D. Non-Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform Generation in Critically Ill Patients: A Sensor-Based Deep Learning Approach. Comput. Biol. Med. 2026, 213, 111861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Pugalenthi, L.S.; Senapati, S.G.; Gohri, J.; Anam, H.L.; Madan, H.; Arora, A.; Arora, A.; Lee, J.; Yerrapragada, G.; Elangovan, P.; et al. Blood Pressure Variability (BPV) as a Novel Digital Biomarker of Multisystem Risk and Diagnostic Insight: Measurement, Mechanisms, and Emerging Artificial Intelligence Methods. Biomedicines 2026, 14, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Msokar, S.; Davydov, R.; Davydov, V. Interpretable Photoplethysmography Feature Engineering for Multi-Class Blood Pressure Staging. Computers 2026, 15, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, Y.; Xu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Chen, H.; Xu, H.; Ye, Y.; Xue, F.; Zhang, H.; Su, S.; Liu, X. Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Cuffless Continuous Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Device in ICU Patients. Digit. Health 2026, 12, 20552076261456613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hellou, E.; Jamal, T.; Zuroff, E.; Kalhor, P.; Delgado-Lelievre, M.; Manzato, M.; Lerman, L.O.; Lerman, A.; Kachel, E.; Zoghby, Z. Performance of a Cuffless Photoplethysmography-Based Device for Continuous Monitoring of Blood Pressure after Cardiac Surgery: A Preliminary Validation Study. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2025, 39, 894–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Dasari, A.; Prakash, S.K.A.; Jeni, L.A.; Tucker, C.S. Evaluation of Biases in Remote Photoplethysmography Methods. npj Digit. Med. 2021, 4, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]




| Study (Year) | Paper Type/Data | Key Findings/Performance | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samimi & Dajani, 2023 [26] | Calibration-free cuffless BP; PPG/cardiovascular dynamics | Demonstrated calibration-free BP estimation; BHS Grade A and AAMI-related validation reported | Limited BP-related information in PPG; interpretability, robustness, and physiological validation remain a concern |
| Arjomand et al., 2025 [23] | Transformer; PPG-only | Transformer-based BP estimation from a single PPG signal | Further external and clinical validation required |
| Mukkamala et al., 2015 [16] | ECG–PPG; PTT-based analysis | PTT, measured from the ECG and PPG signals, was used for beat-to-beat BP estimation | Requires dual-sensor measurements; calibration-related limitations |
| Kachuee et al., 2017 [17] | PPG signal-based continuous BP monitoring; feature-based ML | MAE of 9.43 mmHg for SBP and 6.88 mmHg for DBP | Requires further validation for broader clinical/wearable applications |
| Slapničar et al., 2019 [9] | CNN using raw PPG signal | Demonstrated BP estimation with good generalization across subjects and different signal qualities | Generalization to real-world wearable conditions remains a challenge |
| Liu et al., 2020 [27] | ECG–PPG features; ML models; invasive arterial BP reference | Random forest achieved the best performance; RMSE was 5.87 ± 3.13 mmHg for SBP and 3.52 ± 1.38 mmHg for DBP | Small cohort of 35 clinically stable patients with arrhythmias; no independent external validation and limited generalizability |
| Mahmud et al., 2022 [21] | PPG + ECG; Shallow U-Net | AI-based BP prediction using multimodal PPG and ECG signals | Requires multimodal sensing; external validation remains important |
| Yousefian et al., 2020 [22] | BCG + PPG; PTT–PWA fusion | Wearable cuffless BP trend tracking using multimodal physiological signals | Requires multiple sensors/signals; focused on BP trend tracking rather than fully validated absolute BP measurement |
| Study (Year) | Method/Model | Key Findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| WHO, 2025 [28] | Global epidemiological data | 1.28B affected; high burden in No tech/device evaluation | Epidemiological data; no specific device evaluation |
| Forouzanfar et al., 2017 [15] | Epidemiology GBD study | Hypertension/elevated BP represents a major global cardiovascular health burden. | Population-level, no evaluation of cuffless BP technology |
| Stergiou et al., 2018 [19] | BP device validation protocols | Highlights the importance of standardized validation protocols for BP-measuring devices. | Existing validation protocols may not fully address emerging cuffless technologies |
| Avolio et al., 2022 [20] | Cuffless BP clinical challenges | Identifies calibration, validation, motion artifacts, skin tone, and regulatory issues affecting cuffless BP adoption. | Lack of standardization and adequate validation limits clinical adoption |
| Criteria | Deep Learning Models | Classical Classifiers |
|---|---|---|
| Algorithms | CNN, RNN, LSTM, Transformers | SVM, Random Forest, Logistic Regression |
| Feature Engineering | Not required (end-to end learning) | Required (HRV, entropy, etc.) |
| Input Type | Raw waveform | Handcrafted features |
| Sensitivity/Specificity | High (AUC > 0.95 in many studies) | Moderate to high (AUC 0.80–0.94) |
| Robustness to Noise | High (especially with attention mechanisms) | Lower (sensitive to motion artifacts) |
| Interpretability | Low (black-box models) | Higher (e.g., decision trees offer explainable logic) |
| Resource Requirements | High (training + inference) | Low to Moderate |
| Deployment | Challenging without optimization | Easier on low-power or embedded devices |
| Type | Algorithms | Input | Perf. | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classical ML | SVM, Random Forest, Logistic Regression | Handcrafted features (HRV, RR interval SD, entropy) [32] | Moderate to high | Interpretable, low resource, easy deployment | Needs feature engineering, noise sensitive [32,33,34,35] |
| Deep Learning | CNN, RNN, LSTM, Transformers (with attention e.g., SQUWA) | Raw PPG waveform | High; AUC > 0.95 reported in many studies [32] | End to end learning, captures waveform, helps reduce noise | Black-box, high compute, harder deployment |
| Study (Year) | Method | Findings/Insights | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charlton et al., 2017 [44] | Systematic review of ECG/signal processing | Respiratory waveform recovery feasible with proper processing | No new data; performance depends on sensor placement Conceptual |
| Meredith et al., 2012 [45] | Review of physiological basis and processing | PPG-derived respiratory rate feasible across datasets | Different derivation methods and respiratory patterns may affect performance [45] |
| Karlen et al., 2013 [46] | Smart Fusion of respiratory-induced frequency, intensity, and amplitude variation extracted from PPG | Combining the three estimates showed a trend toward lower respiratory rate estimation error than individual methods | Evaluated in 29 children and 13 adults; estimates affected by artifacts or disagreement between methods were rejected |
| Nilsson, 2013 [47] | Review of respiratory modulation in PPG signals | Respiratory modulation of the PPG waveform can support respiratory rate monitoring | Patient movement and movement at the probe-tissue interface can interfere with the signal |
| Jiang et al., 2023 [39] | 1D-CNN on raw | >90% accuracy for sleep apnea detection | Further validation across diverse populations and real-world settings is required [39] |
| Choksatchawathi et al., 2024 [52] | Deep learning using features extracted from fingertip PPG signals | Improved sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC relative to the comparison models on two benchmark datasets | Evaluation used existing sleep-laboratory datasets; prospective validation in routine clinical settings remains needed |
| Sadeh & Acebo, 2002 [42] | Clinical review of actigraphy for sleep–wake assessment | Actigraphy helps document sleep-wake patterns and responses to behavioral and medical interventions | Less reliable during prolonged motionless wakefulness or altered movement patterns; accuracy depends on the device, scoring algorithm, and population |
| Morgenthaler et al., 2007 [48] | AASM practice parameters based on systematically graded evidence | Supports actigraphy for assessing sleep patterns, circadian rhythms, and treatment response in selected populations; may estimate total sleep time in OSA when PSG is unavailable | Recommendations depend on the population and clinical purpose; further research is needed to broaden clinical applications |
| Kotzen et al., 2023 [40] | SleepPPG-Net: deep learning for four-class sleep staging from continuous raw PPG | Median Cohen’s κ of 0.75 on the held-out test set; κ of 0.74 on an external database after transfer learning | External database performance was evaluated after model adaptation; this does not establish equivalent performance without adaptation |
| Gil et al., 2010 [49] | PPG pulse-rate variability in children | PRV correlates with sleep-disordered breathing | Pediatric population; adult applicability is uncertain |
| Kapur et al., 2017 [51] | AASM clinical practice guideline for adult OSA diagnostic testing | Supports technically adequate home sleep apnea testing in uncomplicated adults at increased risk of moderate-to-severe OSA | PSG is recommended after a negative, inconclusive, or technically inadequate home test, and for patients with specified complicating conditions |
| Study (Reference) | Signal Inputs | Feature Engineering/Preprocessing | AI/ML Model Type | Performance (AUC, Sensitivity, Specificity, etc.) | Dataset/Cohort | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhang & Ma (2023)—Software Eng. & Applications (China) [56] | PPG only (fingertip) | Preprocessing with wavelet scattering; features learned via pre-trained CNN (GoogLeNet) on PPG waveform | CNN with fine-tuning | Accuracy ~97.8%; Sens ~96%; Spec ~98%; F1-scores ~0.96 | N = 216 PPG recordings with invasive PAP labels (RHC as gold standard) | Pilot single-center study; validated on hold-out test split; potential overfitting; no external validation yet |
| Nemati et al. (2024) —Diagnostics (MDPI)—Analytics4Life/CorVista [57] | PPG + OVG (orthogonal voltage gradient) | Hand-crafted library of ~3298 features capturing electro-mechanical synchrony; reduced to 216 features | Elastic Net logistic regression + Random Forest stacking (ensemble) | AUROC ≈ 0.93; Sens 87%; Spec 83%; consistent across subgroups | Multi-center development dataset; symptomatic patients with RHC and healthy volunteers | Developed point-of-care algorithm; robust; validated internally; awaiting independent external validation (achieved later) |
| McLean et al. (2025) [58] | PPG + OVG (multimodal cardiac signals) | Proprietary machine-learned algorithm combining electrical and perfusion metrics | Supervised ML classifier (based on prior ensemble approach) | AUROC = 0.95 (mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg); Sens 82%; Spec 92%; at mPAP ≥ 21 mmHg: AUC = 0.93, Sens 78%, Spec 92%; NPV > 99% | N = 462 symptomatic patients; multi-center (18 U.S. sites); all RHC confirmed; train/test split | Clinical validation of CorVista PH Add-On; first FDA-cleared PPG + OVG PH test; generalizable across PH etiologies; comparable to echocardiographic screening |
| Modality | Advantages | Limitations | Stage of Validation |
|---|---|---|---|
| HVPG (Gold Standard) [69] | Accurate measurement; strong prognostic value | Invasive; costly; requires expertise; limited availability | Fully validated |
| Transient Elastography (TE) [70] | Quick; bedside; correlates with fibrosis and portal pressure | Limited by ascites, obesity; operator-dependent; not always predictive of complications | Widely used; Baveno endorsed |
| 2D SWE/pSWE [70] | Real-time imaging; correlates with HVPG | Requires technical skill; variability in measurement; limited use in severe cases | Emerging validation |
| CT/MRI Radiomics [70] | Detailed anatomical and functional info; can assess collaterals and flow | Expensive; radiation (CT); complex processing; limited reproducibility | Moderate validation in research |
| Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound [70] | Visualizes perfusion and collaterals; SHAPE correlates with HVPG | IV contrast required; limited success rate; equipment and operator-sensitive | Promising; early validation |
| Serum Biomarkers (e.g., U-II, Endothelin-1) [70] | Non-invasive; accessible via routine blood draws | Poor specificity; influenced by comorbidities; lack of standard cutoffs. | Low; investigational |
| Photoplethysmography [72,73] | Low-cost; portable; real time vascular data; wearable compatible | Not liver-specific; limited studies of cirrhosis; indirect measure of portal pressure | Experimental; early human data |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Joshi, D.D.; Saraboji, K.; Shaik, A.T.; Sakalabaktula, K.S.K.; Purohit, S.; Godugu, S.; Nirmal, J.; Kayarkar, R.; Correa, B.H.M.; Gangidi, N.; et al. Artificial Intelligence Enabled Diagnostics Using Photoplethysmography (PPG): Beyond SpO2 and Heart Rate. Life 2026, 16, 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16091530
Joshi DD, Saraboji K, Shaik AT, Sakalabaktula KSK, Purohit S, Godugu S, Nirmal J, Kayarkar R, Correa BHM, Gangidi N, et al. Artificial Intelligence Enabled Diagnostics Using Photoplethysmography (PPG): Beyond SpO2 and Heart Rate. Life. 2026; 16(9):1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16091530
Chicago/Turabian StyleJoshi, Divya Dinesh, Kaaviyashri Saraboji, Asiya Tasleema Shaik, Krishna Sai Kiran Sakalabaktula, Shreya Purohit, Swathi Godugu, Jasmine Nirmal, Riya Kayarkar, Bernardo Henrique Mendes Correa, Namratha Gangidi, and et al. 2026. "Artificial Intelligence Enabled Diagnostics Using Photoplethysmography (PPG): Beyond SpO2 and Heart Rate" Life 16, no. 9: 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16091530
APA StyleJoshi, D. D., Saraboji, K., Shaik, A. T., Sakalabaktula, K. S. K., Purohit, S., Godugu, S., Nirmal, J., Kayarkar, R., Correa, B. H. M., Gangidi, N., Yadav, P., Yadav, J., Farook, F., Lee, J., Shariff, M. N., Sundaram, D. S. B., Yerrapragada, G., Elangovan, P., Natarajan, T., ... Arunachalam, S. P. (2026). Artificial Intelligence Enabled Diagnostics Using Photoplethysmography (PPG): Beyond SpO2 and Heart Rate. Life, 16(9), 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16091530

