Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Preoperative Refractive Status and Postoperative Outcomes Following Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy
Previous Article in Journal
Susceptibility of Leaves from Commercially Important Ornamental Shrubs to Artificial Inoculation with Phytophthora ramorum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Disease-Suppressive Activity of Lecithin Against Foliar Infection by Rhizoctonia solani Isolates in Cabbage, Rice, and Brachypodium distachyon

1
Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
2
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery, Hong Duc University, Thanh Hoa City 440000, Vietnam
3
School of Agriculture, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
4
Faculty of Bioscience and Applied Chemistry, Hosei University, Tokyo 184-8584, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this paper.
Life 2026, 16(6), 998; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16060998 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 May 2026 / Revised: 8 June 2026 / Accepted: 10 June 2026 / Published: 13 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani is a necrotrophic phytopathogenic fungus that causes disease in various crops. In agriculture, many crops suffer from root or seedling rot caused by this soil-borne pathogen, whereas cabbage and rice develop lesion-like symptoms on aboveground tissues. Diseases caused by R. solani are generally controlled using chemical fungicides; however, environmentally friendly alternatives are needed for sustainable agriculture. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of lecithin, a mixture of phospholipids previously registered in Japan as an agrochemical for controlling cucumber powdery mildew, against Rhizoctonia diseases. In cabbage, foliar spraying of 0.2–1.0% soybean lecithin effectively suppressed leaf symptoms caused by R. solani isolate RhiCa-2, which was identified as AG-1 IB. In rice and Brachypodium distachyon, 0.2–1.0% lecithin significantly suppressed leaf symptoms induced by R. solani AG-1 IA. Hyphal staining of inoculated leaves revealed reduced hyphal density on lecithin-treated leaves. Consistently, hyphal growth of R. solani on cellophane placed on water agar was retarded by lecithin treatment. However, 5.0% lecithin induced phytotoxicity in B. distachyon. Egg yolk-derived lecithin also exhibited disease-suppressive activity in cabbage and B. distachyon, with efficacy comparable to that of soybean lecithin under the conditions tested. These results suggest that lecithin suppresses foliar infection by R. solani, at least in part, through direct inhibitory effects on fungal hyphae, and may serve as a potential alternative material for disease control in sustainable crop production.

1. Introduction

Rhizoctonia solani is a soil-borne necrotrophic fungus with a broad host range that belongs to the phylum Basidiomycota [1,2]. R. solani is a species complex traditionally classified into 13 anastomosis groups (AGs) based on compatibility in hyphal fusion reactions [2,3]. Because certain AGs are frequently isolated from particular Rhizoctonia diseases in specific crops, AG classification has long been considered to be associated with host preference or host specificity. However, accumulating evidence indicates that the relationship between AGs and host range is not always straightforward [4,5,6,7,8,9].
Most plants suffer from root or seedling rot caused by R. solani, particularly when young seedlings are transplanted into infested soil under disease-conducive conditions. However, some plants develop lesion-like symptoms on aboveground tissues. In rice grown in paddy fields, sheath blight is caused mainly by R. solani AG-1 IA. Floating sclerotia attach to rice sheaths and subsequently develop into round lesions, after which aerial hyphae spread to the upper parts of the plant [10,11]. R. solani AG-1 IA also causes severe leaf symptoms in detached leaves or plantlets of the model monocotyledonous plant Brachypodium distachyon [12,13]. We have previously compiled basic information on B. distachyon, including plant hormone-responsive marker genes and the transcriptome associated with pattern-triggered immunity, and have characterized the pathogenicity mechanisms of this fungus by analyzing the responses of this model plant during its interaction with R. solani [9,14,15,16]. In addition to monocotyledonous plants, dicotyledonous crops are also severely impacted. For instance, cabbage is affected by several Rhizoctonia diseases, including damping-off, wirestem, root rot, bottom rot, and head rot [17,18].
In Japan, fungicides from several chemical classes are used to manage Rhizoctonia diseases in rice and cabbage. Under ordinary disease pressure, rice sheath blight may be partially suppressed as a secondary effect of strobilurin-type quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicides, which are primarily applied to control rice blast caused by Pyricularia oryzae. However, QoI-resistant isolates of R. solani AG-1 IA causing sheath blight have been reported in the United States [19,20]. When sheath blight reaches epidemic levels, fungicides specifically targeting this disease are used, including validamycin and succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHIs), such as flutolanil and penthiopyrad [21,22]. For cabbage bottom rot caused by R. solani, a broader spectrum of fungicide classes is registered in Japan. These include QoIs and SDHIs, which target distinct sites of mitochondrial respiration, as well as the dicarboximide iprodione, the pyridinamine-type oxidative phosphorylation uncoupler fluazinam, and validamycin. In addition, soil disinfestation with dazomet is practiced to manage cabbage damping-off caused by R. solani.
In 2021, the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) launched the MIDORI Strategy for Sustainable Food Systems, which aims to reduce the risk-weighted use of chemical pesticides by 10% by 2030 and by 50% by 2050 through the dissemination of integrated pest management and newly developed alternatives. Since the development and registration of new pesticides generally require a long period of time, alternative and complementary disease management approaches that can be implemented relatively rapidly are urgently needed.
Lecithin is a complex mixture of phospholipids whose major components include phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), and phosphatidic acid (PA), together with other minor phospholipid species [23]. Because phospholipids possess both hydrophilic and hydrophobic domains, lecithin exhibits amphiphilic properties and can function as an emulsifier. Accordingly, lecithin has long been used as a natural emulsifier in a wide range of applications, including food products, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals [23,24,25]. Commercial lecithin is produced mainly from plant oils, particularly soybean oil, as well as from egg yolk and other biological sources.
Previous studies at RIKEN demonstrated that soybean lecithin suppresses disease development caused by the rice blast fungus and powdery mildew fungi [26,27,28]. In the rice blast fungus, soybean lecithin inhibited penetration by infection hyphae at 5 ppm and markedly suppressed sporulation at concentrations above 10 ppm, whereas its inhibitory effect on mycelial growth was weak even at 500 ppm; furthermore, appressorium formation was inhibited at concentrations above 500 ppm and completely suppressed at 1000 ppm [28]. Soybean lecithin has also been reported to affect the development of the cucumber powdery mildew fungus, Sphaerotheca fuliginea [27,29]. These findings suggest that soybean lecithin can interfere with specific infection-related developmental processes in plant-pathogenic fungi. A commercial formulation containing soybean lecithin, consisting of 30% soybean lecithin and 70% butyl carbitol as a solvent, was registered as a pesticide in Japan in the 1970s, although its registration later lapsed. Nevertheless, because soybean lecithin is a naturally derived material and is listed among substances exempted from pesticide residue standards in Japan, it holds potential as an environmentally low-impact agricultural material compatible with sustainable crop protection.
In light of these considerations, we evaluated the efficacy of foliar application of soybean lecithin against foliar diseases caused by different R. solani isolates in cabbage and rice, both of which are agriculturally important crops affected by this pathogen in Japan. In addition, we used B. distachyon as an experimental model, as in our previous studies. Lecithin treatment reduced disease symptoms in these plants, which coincided with reduced hyphal development on inoculated leaves. We further examined whether the disease-suppressive activity of lecithin against R. solani was primarily due to direct effects on fungal hyphae or to the induction of plant defense responses. Our results suggest that the suppressive effect is driven, at least in part, by direct inhibition of R. solani hyphae, although the possible involvement of plant responses cannot be excluded. Furthermore, we also found that high concentrations of lecithin can cause phytotoxicity, suggesting that the effective concentration range should be carefully optimized for each crop.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Seeds of cabbage (Brassica oleracea cv. Seirin) were purchased from Sakata Seed Corporation (Yokohama, Japan), and seeds of cabbage cvs. Ayahikari and Yumeibuki were purchased from Takii & Co., Ltd. (Kyoto, Japan). Seeds of rice (Oryza sativa cv. Nipponbare) and B. distachyon accession Bd21 were obtained from the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO) Genebank and the RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science (CSRS), Japan, respectively. Cabbage seeds were sown directly in soil in 5 cm square plastic pots with 25 cells (Nichiei-Sangyo, Sano, Japan) placed in 27 cm square half trays (Jiffy, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) and grown in a growth chamber at 23 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod (BiOTRON NKsystem LH-411PFD, Osaka, Japan). Rice and B. distachyon seeds were surface-sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min and rinsed three times with distilled water for 1 min each. After incubation on moist filter paper in Petri dishes covered with aluminum foil at 4 °C for 3 days, the seeds were transferred to a growth chamber under the same conditions. Germinated seedlings were transplanted into soil and grown under the same conditions. The soil used was Sakata Super Mix A (Sakata Seed Corporation) for cabbage and B. distachyon, and Suito Engei Baido Danchi-version (Yanmar Agri, Okayama, Japan) for rice.

2.2. Fungal Isolates and Culture Conditions

R. solani AG-1 IA isolate C-325 (MAFF 305230), originally isolated from rice, was obtained from the NARO Genebank, Japan. Rhizoctonia sp. RhiCa-2 was isolated from diseased cabbage plants in a field located in Gunma Prefecture, Japan, as described below. The isolates were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA; potato dextrose broth supplemented with Bacto agar; BD Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 23 °C. The infectivity of R. solani AG-1 IA isolate C-325 to plantlets and detached leaves of B. distachyon has been demonstrated in our previous studies [9,12,13,15].

2.3. Lecithin Treatment and Leaf Inoculation Assay

Leaves were detached from plants and placed on moist filter paper in Petri dishes (9 cm diameter). For cabbage, 20-day-old plants were used. For B. distachyon and rice, 3-week-old plants were generally used. Soybean lecithin (SLP-white, Tsuji Oil Mills Co., Ltd., Matsusaka, Japan) or egg lecithin (124-05031, Fujifilm Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) was dispersed in water at 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, or 5.0% (w/v) with 0.1% (v/v) spreader (Approach BI; Maruwa Biochemical, Tokyo, Japan) and sprayed onto the detached leaves. The sprayed leaves were kept in a fume hood until dry. Mycelial plugs (4 mm diameter) were prepared from the edge of actively growing colonies of R. solani isolates using a biopsy punch (BP-40F, Kai Industries Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and placed at the center of each detached leaf. A PDA plug without mycelium was used as a control. The inoculated leaves were incubated in a growth chamber under high-humidity conditions for several days, and symptoms were observed daily. The leaves were photographed, and lesion area percentage was quantified using ImageJ software (v 1.54p) [30].

2.4. Identification of the Anastomosis Group of R. solani

Fungal hyphae of Rhizoctonia sp. RhiCa-2 and R. solani AG-1 IA and AG-4 HG-I+II isolate BO-3 (MAFF 305225) were collected from PDA medium and placed in tubes containing four zirconia beads (3 mm diameter). The hyphal samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized using a MicroSmash MS-100 homogenizer (TOMY SEIKO, Tokyo, Japan). Genomic DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin Plant II kit (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Japan), and DNA concentration and quality were assessed using a DS-11 spectrophotometer (DeNovix, Wilmington, DE, USA). PCR was performed using primers specific for each AG and subgroup according to Misawa (2019) [31], and amplification of products of the expected sizes was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The primers used were as follows: for AG-1 IA, 5′-CCTTAATTTGGCAGGAGGG-3′ and 5′-GACTATTAGAAGCGGTTCA-3′ (58 °C, 540 bp); for AG-1 IB, 5′-TGTAGCTGGCCTTTTAAC-3′ and 5′-GGACTATTAGAAGCGGTTCG-3′ (58 °C, 580 bp); for AG-1 IC, 5′-GAGTTGTTGCTGGCCTCTGG-3′ and 5′-CCAAGTCAATGGACTATTG-3′ (58 °C, 550 bp); for AG-2-1, 5′-CAAAGGCAATRGGTTATTGGAC-3′ and 5′-CCTGATTTGAGATCAGATCATAAAG-3′ (60 °C, 480 bp); for AG-2-2 IIIB, 5′-AGGCAGAGRCATGGATGGGAG-3′ and 5′-ACCTTGGCCAMCCTTTTTATC-3′ (62 °C, 500 bp); for AG-2-2 IV, 5′-AGGCAGAGACATGGATGGGAA-3′ and 5′-CTTGGCCACCCMTTTTTTAC-3′ (62 °C, 500 bp); for AG-2-2 LP, 5′-AGGCAGAGAAACATGGATGGGC-3′ and 5′-CCTCCAATACCAAAGTGAAACCAAATC-3′ (62 °C, 400 bp); for AG-2-3, 5′-GTAGCTGGCTCATCGTTCTT-3′ and 5′-CATTTCCCTTGGCCACCTTTG-3′ (62 °C, 400 bp); for AG-2-BI, 5′-GGGGAATTTATTTGTTGTTTTTTGTAATAG-3′ and 5′-CAATGGACTATTAGAAGCA-3′ (55 °C, 510 bp); for AG-3 PT, 5′-CTGAACGCCTCTAAGTCAGAA-3′ and 5′-CTTGATTAATGCAACTCCC-3′ (50 °C, 480 bp); for AG-3 TM, 5′-CTGAACGCCTCTAAGTCAGAA-3′ and 5′-TCATTCTTGATCCACTAGTC-3′ (50 °C, 455 bp); for AG-4 HG-I, 5′-GGACCTACTCTCYTTGG-3′ and 5′-ACAGGGTGTCCTCAGCGA-3′ (55 °C, 420 bp); for AG-4 HG-II, 5′-GGACCTTCTACTCCCCCT-3′ and 5′-ACAGGGTGTCCTCAGCGA-3′ (55 °C, 420 bp); for AG-4 HG-III, 5′-GTTGTAGCTGGCATTTCC-3′ and 5′-CCACCCCTCCCAAACTCT-3′ (58 °C, 560 bp); for AG-5, 5′-GGTTGTAGCTGGCTCATGAA-3′ and 5′-TGATACTCAAACAGGCATGC-3′ (55–58 °C, 350 bp); and for AG-6, 5′-CCCTCTGTCTACTCAATCCA-3′ and 5′-TGATACTCAAACAGGCATGC-3′ (55–58 °C, 230 bp).

2.5. RNA Extraction and Gene Expression Analysis

Detached B. distachyon leaves were sprayed with 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, or 5.0% lecithin and sampled after 24 h of treatment in tubes containing four zirconia beads (3 mm diameter), followed by immediate freezing in liquid nitrogen. The collected leaves were homogenized, and total RNA was extracted using the ISOSPIN Plant RNA kit (NIPPON GENE, Tokyo, Japan). RNA quantity and quality were assessed using a spectrophotometer. cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on a LightCycler 96 Real-Time PCR System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The primers used were as follows: for BdWRKY38 (Bradi2g30695), 5′-GGACACCTTCAGGGTGACAT-3′ and 5′-TTGTCGTCGTGGTAGGAGTG-3′ [12,14]. Gene expression levels were normalized to BdUbi4 (Bradi3g04730), using primers 5′-TGACACCATCGACAACGTGA-3′ and 5′-GAGGGTGGACTCCTTCTGGA-3′ [32]. All experiments were performed with three biological replicates.

2.6. Hyphal Staining and Microscopic Analysis

Inoculated leaves of cabbage, B. distachyon, and rice were collected at 4, 3, and 8 days post-inoculation (dpi), respectively, and excised sections were placed in 2 mL tubes. The leaves were fixed using a graded ethanol series and incubated at 4 °C until chlorophyll was removed. They were then stained overnight with 0.1% (w/v) lactophenol trypan blue, and excess stain was removed by incubating the samples in a chloral hydrate solution (2.5 g/mL) until the tissue became fully transparent. The stained leaf samples were observed using a stereo microscope (ZEISS Stemi 305, Oberkochen, Germany).

2.7. Evaluation of the Effect of Lecithin on R. solani Growth

Cellophane membranes (9 cm diameter) were soaked in water and autoclaved. The membranes were then placed on 2.0% water agar (BA-10, INA, Ina, Japan) in Petri dishes. Lecithin solutions at concentrations of 0, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%, each containing 0.1% (v/v) spreader (Approach BI), were evenly sprayed onto each cellophane membrane and briefly dried in a clean bench. Mycelial plugs were prepared from PDA medium colonized by R. solani AG-1 IA (MAFF 305230) using a biopsy punch (BP-40F, Kai Industries Co., Ltd.) and placed at the center of the cellophane membranes. The colony diameter was measured daily.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of the Causal Agent of Cabbage Bottom Rot in Gunma Prefecture, Japan

Seedling rot and bottom rot occurred in cabbage plants in Tsumagoi Village, Gunma Prefecture, Japan, and a fungal isolate designated RhiCa-2 was obtained from diseased cabbage tissues in 2017. Based on microscopic observation of the hyphae, the isolate was presumed to belong to Rhizoctonia sp. When the hyphae were observed by confocal microscopy after staining with Hoechst 33342 and SR2200, multiple nuclei were detected in each cell (Figure S1A), similar to R. solani AG-1 IA, which was used as a control. Thus, we concluded that the causal agent was a multinucleate Rhizoctonia isolate, rather than a binucleate Rhizoctonia isolate.
To further identify this causal agent, genomic DNA was extracted and analyzed by PCR using AG-specific primers covering AG-1 to AG-6 [31]. Amplification of a PCR product of the expected size was detected in RhiCa-2 only when primers specific for AG-1 IB were used (Figure S1B). R. solani AG-1 IA, AG-2-1 N1, and AG-4 HG-I+II were used as controls, and each was detected using its corresponding primer set.
When RhiCa-2 was inoculated onto detached leaves of three cabbage cultivars (Seirin, Ayahikari, and Yumeibuki), necrotic symptoms spread over almost the entire leaf area within 6 days (Figure 1; Figure S2A,B). Among the control isolates, AG-1 IA showed little virulence, whereas AG-4 HG-I+II caused necrosis around the inoculated mycelial plugs (Figure 1; Figure S2A,B). The expansion rate of the necrotic area caused by RhiCa-2 was higher than that caused by AG-4 HG-I+II. In addition, symptoms caused by RhiCa-2 spread uniformly, whereas those caused by AG-4 HG-I+II appeared patchy. The same fungal isolate was recovered from symptomatic tissues and reproducibly caused disease in cabbage. Based on these results, we concluded that Rhizoctonia sp. RhiCa-2, isolated from diseased cabbage in Gunma Prefecture, was R. solani AG-1 IB.

3.2. Effect of Lecithin Spraying on Disease Progression in Leaves Caused by R. solani

Because lecithin has been used as an agrochemical for the control of powdery mildew, we hypothesized that it could suppress foliar symptoms caused by R. solani in plants. We first tested its effect on cabbage. Soybean lecithin was sprayed onto cabbage leaves at concentrations of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%, followed by inoculation with R. solani AG-1 IB isolate RhiCa-2. Lecithin at 0.2–1.0% exhibited disease-suppressive activity, with a significant reduction in lesion area (Figure 2A). At 5.0%, lecithin also reduced the lesion area, but the effect appeared weaker than that observed at lower concentrations.
We further tested the activity of lecithin against R. solani diseases in monocotyledonous plants, namely rice and B. distachyon. Lecithin was sprayed onto detached leaves of rice and B. distachyon at the same concentration range, followed by inoculation with R. solani AG-1 IA. As shown in Figure 2B,C, 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0% lecithin suppressed symptoms in both plant species. These results indicate that lecithin can suppress foliar symptoms caused by R. solani in both dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants, with a similar effective concentration range among the plant species tested.

3.3. Mycelial Growth of R. solani on Lecithin-Treated Leaves

To investigate the mechanism underlying lecithin-mediated disease suppression against R. solani, hyphal growth on lecithin-treated leaves was observed microscopically. Pathogen-inoculated leaves of cabbage, rice, and B. distachyon treated with different concentrations of lecithin were sampled, and fungal hyphae were stained with trypan blue. Whereas extensive hyphal spread was clearly observed in the control leaves, hyphal density decreased in the lecithin-treated leaves (Figure 3). In particular, numerous infection cushions were observed at the sampling time point in the control monocotyledonous plants, whereas the formation of such infection structures appeared to be inhibited by lecithin treatment.

3.4. Suppression of Hyphal Growth of R. solani on Cellophane by Lecithin

To further confirm the inhibitory effect of lecithin on fungal growth, we sprayed lecithin solutions onto cellophane sheets placed on water agar and then observed the hyphal elongation of R. solani AG-1 IA. Hyphal growth rate decreased significantly on the lecithin-treated cellophane (Figure 4). This reduction in growth rate was observed at all lecithin concentrations tested, with no obvious differences among them.

3.5. Phytotoxic Activity of Lecithin on B. distachyon

We examined the phytotoxic activity of lecithin in plants. Different concentrations of lecithin were sprayed onto detached B. distachyon leaves, which were then observed daily. At 6 days post-treatment, leaves treated with 5.0% lecithin showed browning symptoms (Figure 5). This result suggests that high concentrations of lecithin have a negative effect on plant viability. Thus, 5% lecithin is outside the appropriate concentration range for disease suppression. Although phytotoxic activity was characterized only in B. distachyon in this study, further characterization of its effects on rice, cabbage, and other plant species, as well as its detailed effects on plant tissues and the underlying mechanisms, will be needed in future studies.

3.6. Effect of Lecithin on Defense-Related Gene Expression in B. distachyon

We also examined whether lecithin treatment affects the expression of defense-related genes in plants using B. distachyon. Lecithin (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%) was sprayed onto B. distachyon leaves, and the expression of BdWRKY38 was analyzed by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) using cDNA prepared from RNA extracted from lecithin-treated leaf samples. The expression level of BdWRKY38 was not significantly induced by lecithin treatment compared with the control, at least at the time point tested (Figure S3).

3.7. Disease-Suppressive Effect of Egg Lecithin Against R. solani

We also evaluated the disease-suppressive activity of egg yolk-derived lecithin on B. distachyon and cabbage. Detached leaves of B. distachyon and cabbage were sprayed with different concentrations of egg lecithin (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%), and symptoms caused by R. solani AG-1 IA and the AG-1 IB isolate RhiCa-2, respectively, were assessed. Egg lecithin also effectively suppressed symptoms in both plant species (Figure 6), with an efficacy comparable to that of soybean lecithin under the tested conditions. These results suggest that egg lecithin possesses potential as an alternative material for controlling Rhizoctonia diseases.

4. Discussion

This study revealed that Rhizoctonia sp. RhiCa-2 isolate, obtained from lesions on cabbage plants in Tsumagoi Village, Gunma Prefecture, was R. solani AG-1 IB. Damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia, Pythium, and Fusarium spp. is usually managed simply by removing diseased plants from the field unless severe damage occurs; therefore, the causal pathogens are often not precisely identified in practice. In cabbage, however, Rhizoctonia disease occurs not only as damping-off but also as bottom rot. Thus, the fungal population density in the field may increase, potentially leading to severe disease outbreaks under favorable conditions.
Fourteen Rhizoctonia isolates obtained from lesions on cabbage have been registered in the MAFF Genebank. The MAFF 245727 isolate, obtained in Hokkaido in 2015, was identified as AG-1 IC [33]. In addition, four isolates obtained in Iwate Prefecture in 2021 were identified as AG-2-1 and AG-2-2 IV [34]. Other isolates include AG-1 IA and AG-4 HG-I. Among these previously reported Rhizoctonia isolates infecting cabbage, two belong to AG-1 IB [MAFF 242306 (isolate CL1) and MAFF 242988 (isolate 09SKC-3)], both of which were isolated from different fields in Hokkaido. R. solani AG-1 IA isolates collected from cabbage (MAFF 237424), rice (isolate Cs-Gi), and timothy [MAFF 243451 (isolate MT-2)] showed pathogenicity when inoculated onto cabbage in the field [35,36]. To our knowledge, RhiCa-2 represents the first AG-1 IB isolate from cabbage identified in Honshu, the largest island of Japan.
The AGs of R. solani isolated from cabbage are notably diverse. This is consistent with previous studies suggesting that there is no strict correlation between pathogenicity and AG classification. One possible explanation is that, among fungal strains adapted to local environmental conditions (such as soil composition, pH, and soil temperature), strains retaining pathogenicity toward cabbage become established as causal agents in each region, and this trait may not be strictly linked to AG classification.
Given the diversity of AGs and pathogenicity mechanisms in R. solani, control strategies effective across different isolates and host plants would be highly valuable. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of soybean lecithin in controlling Rhizoctonia disease as a potential management strategy that could contribute to achieving the SDGs and to the Strategy for Sustainable Food Systems, MIDORI. Previous studies have reported the disease-control effects of lecithin against the rice blast fungus and powdery mildew fungi [26,27,28,37,38,39]. More recently, the crop protection activity of lecithin against grapevine downy mildew was reported [40]. However, its effects against Rhizoctonia diseases have not been extensively investigated. Our results demonstrated that lecithin exhibited control efficacy against foliar infection by R. solani in cabbage, rice, and B. distachyon under laboratory conditions.
We previously reported that pretreatment with salicylic acid confers disease control against AG-1 IA infection in rice and B. distachyon [12,13]. In contrast, we also showed that salicylic acid pretreatment does not induce resistance against any of the AGs tested, including AG-1 IA, in Arabidopsis [8], or against AG-4 HG-I+II in rice or B. distachyon [9]. These findings suggest that R. solani comprises diverse anastomosis groups and that its pathogenicity mechanisms are similarly diverse. Although the infection mechanism of R. solani AG-1 IB isolate RhiCa-2 in cabbage, as well as the effects of plant hormones on resistance induction against this isolate, remain unclear, a disease-control effect of lecithin was commonly observed against all isolates tested in this study. These results suggest that lecithin may have broad applicability against R. solani isolates, although further validation using additional isolates is required.
Furthermore, because induction of the defense-related gene BdWRKY38 was not detected after lecithin treatment, salicylic acid-dependent defense responses may not be induced by lecithin in B. distachyon, at least under the conditions tested. Thus, the suppressive effect of lecithin on lesion formation caused by Rhizoctonia is likely attributable, at least in part, to a direct effect on fungal hyphae. Consistent with this interpretation, hyphal density was lower on lecithin-treated leaves than on control leaves. Inhibition of hyphal elongation was also observed when lecithin was applied to cellophane placed on water agar. Because conditions such as moisture availability differ between the leaf surface and cellophane on water agar, this assay does not fully reproduce the action of lecithin on the leaf surface. Nevertheless, these results support the possibility that lecithin directly affects Rhizoctonia hyphae.
Given its amphiphilic properties, lecithin may disrupt biological cell membranes. This possibility could be examined in greater detail through follow-up experiments involving electron microscopic observation of lecithin-treated hyphae. Indeed, previous studies on powdery mildew fungi have shown shrunken hyphal tips after lecithin treatment at 2000 ppm (0.2%) [27]. In addition, 0.05% lecithin (500 ppm) induced morphological abnormalities in conidia and germ tubes of P. oryzae [38]. These findings support the possibility that lecithin exerts a similar negative effect on Rhizoctonia hyphae. Interestingly, appressorial penetration by P. oryzae was almost completely prevented by lecithin even at 5 ppm [28,38].
In our study, infection cushion formation was observed in rice and B. distachyon, but not in cabbage. Specific infection-related structures of R. solani, such as infection cushions, may differ in their sensitivity to lecithin, although this possibility should be examined more directly. Therefore, for practical application, it would be useful to determine the optimal application concentration of lecithin for each crop.
Although the present results support a direct inhibitory effect of lecithin on fungal hyphae, the possibility that lecithin also induces other defense-related activities in plants cannot be excluded. Lecithin has been reported to induce fengycin lipopeptide production by beneficial bacteria, thereby contributing to the suppression of cucumber mosaic virus [41]. Lecithin may also exert indirect effects on plants through environmental microorganisms. Additionally, our experiments revealed phytotoxicity caused by lecithin at high concentrations. Stress conditions induced by lecithin treatment may trigger defense-related activities other than the salicylic-acid-dependent response examined, thereby contributing to protective activity against a certain range of pathogens.
Taken together, our findings support the potential applicability of lecithin for controlling Rhizoctonia diseases in multiple host plants. However, the precise mode of action of lecithin, including its direct effects on fungal hyphae, possible indirect effects on plant defense responses, and phytotoxic activity at high concentrations, remains to be clarified in future studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life16060998/s1, Figure S1: Identification of fungal species of RhiCa-2 and its virulence evaluation on cabbage. (A) Fungal hyphae of Rhizoctonia sp. RhiCa-2 and Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA (MAFF305230) were stained with Hoechst 33342 and SR2200 (SCRI Renaissance Stain 2200) with or without propidium iodide and observed with confocal fluorescent microscopy. Multiple nuclei were observed in both fungal isolates. (B) Gel electrophoresis of PCR products amplified using primers that specifically detect AGs from AG-1 to AG-6. In addition to RhiCa-2 (lane 1), AG-1 IA (lane 2), AG-2-1 N1 (lane 3), and AG-4 HG-I+II (lane 4) were used as sources of template genomic DNA to confirm the validity of the experiment; Figure S2: Evaluation of virulence of Rhizoctonia sp. RhiCa-2 on cabbage cultivars. (A,B) Mycelial plugs of AG-1 IA, RhiCa-2, or AG-4 HG-I+II were inoculated to detached leaves of cabbage cultivars Ayahikari (A) or Yumeibuki (B), and photographs were taken at 1, 2, 3, and 6 dpi; Figure S3: Evaluation of induction of defense-related gene induction by lecithin treatment in Brachypodium distachyon. B. distachyon leaves were treated with lecithin (0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 5.0%), and BdWRKY38 expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR using BdUbi4 as an internal control. BdWRKY38 was used as a marker for salicylic acid-responsive defense signaling. Lecithin treatment did not significantly upregulate BdWRKY38 expression was at any concentration tested. Salicylic acid was used as a positive control. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences, as assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (p < 0.01).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Y.N., Investigation: T.X.C., M.A., D.H., M.S. and M.W., Validation: T.X.C., M.A., D.H., M.S. and M.W., Visualization: T.X.C., M.A., D.H. and Y.N., Resources: K.I., Writing—original draft preparation: T.X.C. and Y.N., Writing—review and editing: T.X.C., M.A., D.H., M.S., M.W., N.S., H.M., K.T., Y.I., K.I. and Y.N., Supervision: M.W., N.S., H.M., K.T., Y.I. and Y.N., Project administration: Y.N., Funding acquisition: Y.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Grant No. JP24K01759; the research program on development of innovative technology grants from the Project of the Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (BRAIN) (No. 03014A2); and basic fund from Okayama University to Y.N.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Miyu Arai and Hitoshi Yoshizawa of the Agricultural Technology Center, Gunma Prefecture, for providing the R. solani isolate RhiCa-2, and Keiichi Mochida for providing seeds of B. distachyon. We are grateful to Tomoo Misawa for insightful discussions and valuable suggestions. We also thank Tsuji Oil Mills Co., Ltd. for kindly providing lecithin for basic academic research. T.X.C. was supported by a Japanese government (MEXT) Scholarship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, N.A. The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1982, 20, 329–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ogoshi, A. Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1987, 25, 125–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Carling, D.E.; Baird, R.E.; Gitaitis, R.D.; Brainard, K.A.; Kuninaga, S. Characterization of AG-13, a newly reported anastomosis group of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bolkan, H.A.; Ribeiro, W.R.C. Anastomosis groups and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani isolates from Brazil. Plant Dis. 1985, 69, 599–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Keijer, J.; Korsman, M.G.; Dullemans, A.M.; Houterman, P.M.; De Bree, J.; Van Silfhout, C.H. In vitro analysis of host plant specificity in Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Pathol. 1997, 46, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pannecoucque, J.; Hofte, M. Interactions between cauliflower and Rhizoctonia anastomosis groups with different levels of pathogenicity. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jaaffar, A.K.M.; Paulitz, T.C.; Schroeder, K.L.; Thomashow, L.S.; Weller, D.M. Molecular characterization, morphological characteristics, virulence, and geographic distribution of Rhizoctonia spp. in Washington State. Phytopathology 2016, 106, 459–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Abdelghany, M.M.A.; Kurikawa, M.; Watanabe, M.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Ichinose, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Kouzai, Y.; Noutoshi, Y. Surveillance of pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani Japanese isolates with varied anastomosis groups and subgroups on Arabidopsis thaliana. Life 2022, 12, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mahadevan, N.; Fernanda, R.; Kouzai, Y.; Kohno, N.; Nagao, R.; Nyein, K.T.; Watanabe, M.; Sakata, N.; Matsui, H.; Toyoda, K.; et al. Distinct infection mechanisms of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA and AG-4 HG-I+II in Brachypodium distachyon and barley. Life 2025, 15, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, F.N.; Rush, M.C. Rice sheath blight: A major rice disease. Plant Dis. 1983, 67, 829–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zheng, A.; Lin, R.; Zhang, D.; Qin, P.; Xu, L.; Ai, P.; Ding, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. The evolution and pathogenic mechanisms of the rice sheath blight pathogen. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kouzai, Y.; Kimura, M.; Watanabe, M.; Kusunoki, K.; Osaka, D.; Suzuki, T.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Ichinose, Y.; Toyoda, K.; et al. Salicylic acid-dependent immunity contributes to resistance against Rhizoctonia solani, a necrotrophic fungal agent of sheath blight, in rice and Brachypodium distachyon. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 771–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kouzai, Y.; Shimizu, M.; Inoue, K.; Uehara-Yamaguchi, Y.; Takahagi, K.; Nakayama, R.; Matsuura, T.; Mori, I.C.; Hirayama, T.; Abdelsalam, S.S.H.; et al. BdWRKY38 is required for the incompatible interaction of Brachypodium distachyon with the necrotrophic fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Plant J. 2020, 104, 995–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kouzai, Y.; Kimura, M.; Yamanaka, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Ichinose, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Onda, Y.; Mochida, K.; et al. Expression profiling of marker genes responsive to the defence-associated phytohormones salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene in Brachypodium distachyon. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abdelsalam, S.S.H.; Kouzai, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Inoue, K.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Ichinose, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Tsuge, S.; Mochida, K.; et al. Identification of effector candidate genes of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA expressed during infection in Brachypodium distachyon. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ogasahara, T.; Kouzai, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Takahashi, A.; Takahagi, K.; Kim, J.-S.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Toyoda, K.; Ichinose, Y.; et al. Time-series transcriptome of Brachypodium distachyon during bacterial flagellin-induced pattern-triggered immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1004184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Babadoost, M. Rhizoctonia Diseases of Cabbage and Related Crops; Report on Plant Disease; No. 902; University of Illinois Extension: Urbana, IL, USA, 1988; Available online: https://ipm.illinois.edu/diseases/rpds/902.pdf (accessed on 9 June 2026).
  18. Saygi, S.; Erper, I.; Ozer, G.; Turkkan, M. First report of Rhizoctonia solani AG 4 HG-I causing damping off and wirestem of white cabbage in Turkey. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 102, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Olaya, G.; Buitrago, C.; Pearsaul, D.; Sierotzki, H.; Tally, A. Detection of resistance to QoI fungicides in Rhizoctonia solani isolates from rice. Phytopathology 2012, 102, S4.88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lunos, A.G. Geographic Distribution and Severity of Strobilurin Fungicide Resistance Among Rhizoctonia solani on Rice in Southwestern Louisiana. Master’s Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hirooka, T.; Miyagi, Y.; Araki, F.; Kunoh, H. Biological mode of action of flutolanil in its systemic control of rice sheath blight. Phytopathology 1989, 79, 1091–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, S.; Hou, Y.; Peng, D.; Meng, L.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y.; Gao, T. Baseline sensitivity and control efficacy of flutolanil in Rhizoctonia solani. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2014, 43, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food (ANS); Mortensen, A.; Aguilar, F.; Crebelli, R.; Di Domenico, A.; Frutos, M.J.; Galtier, P.; Gott, D.; Gundert-Remy, U.; Lambré, C.; et al. Re-evaluation of lecithins (E 322) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e04742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. van Hoogevest, P.; Wendel, A. The use of natural and synthetic phospholipids as pharmaceutical excipients. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2014, 116, 1088–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alhajj, M.J.; Montero, N.; Yarce, C.J.; Salamanca, C.H. Lecithins from vegetable, land, and marine animal sources and their potential applications for cosmetic, food, and pharmaceutical sectors. Cosmetics 2020, 7, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Misato, T.; Homma, Y.; Kō, K. The development of a natural fungicide, soybean lecithin. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 1977, 83, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Homma, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Mizuno, H.; Misato, T. Effect of soybean lecithin on cucumber powdery mildew, Sphaerotheca fuliginea, at various growth stages. J. Pestic. Sci. 1977, 2, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Homma, Y.; Arimoto, Y.; Misato, T. Effect of soybean lecithin on each stage of rice blast fungus, (Pyricularia oryzae Cav.) in its life cycle. J. Pestic. Sci. 1980, 5, 611–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Homma, Y.; Arimoto, Y.; Misato, T. Studies on the mode of action of soybean lecithin. Part 2. Effect of soybean lecithin on developmental stages of cucumber powdery mildew fungus (Sphaerotheca fuliginea). Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 1984, 50, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Misawa, T. Rhizoctonia species. In MAFF Microorganism Genetic Resources Manual; MAFF: Tokyo, Japan, 2019; Volume No. 41, Available online: https://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/dl/pdf/manual/micro-41.pdf (accessed on 9 June 2026).
  32. Chambers, J.P.; Behpouri, A.; Bird, A.; Ng, C.K.Y. Evaluation of the use of the polyubiquitin genes, Ubi4 and Ubi10 as reference genes for expression studies in Brachypodium distachyon. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Misawa, T.; Aoki, M. First report of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IC causing head rot of cabbage in Japan. New Dis. Rep. 2017, 36, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Iwadate, Y.; Nishimura, H.; Sunakoda, S.; Fujisaki, K.; Misawa, T. Damping-off of cabbage caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-1 and AG-2-2 IV. Ann. Rep. Soc. Plant Prot. North Jpn. 2022, 73, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Misawa, T.; Kurose, D. Anastomosis group and subgroup identification of Rhizoctonia solani strains deposited in NARO Genebank, Japan. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2019, 85, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Misawa, T. Pathogenicity of Japanese Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA strains to cabbage plants. Ann. Rep. Soc. Plant Prot. North Jpn. 2022, 73, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Misato, T.; Wakamatsu, H.; Natsume, T.; Yoshioka, A.; Kishi, K. Utilization of food additives as agricultural fungicides. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 1975, 41, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Homma, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Arimoto, Y. Studies on the mode of action of soybean lecithin. Part 3. Effects on the infection process of rice blast fungus, Pyricularia oryzae. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 58, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jolly, M.; Vidal, R.; Marchand, P.A. Lecithins: A food additive valuable for antifungal crop protection. Int. J. Econ. Plants 2018, 5, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Miguel, D.L.; Mena-Petite, A.; Díez-Navajas, A.M. Toxicity and preventive activity of chitosan, Equisetum arvense, lecithin and Salix cortex against Plasmopara viticola, the causal agent of downy mildew in grapevine. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kang, B.R.; Park, J.S.; Jung, W.-J. Antiviral activity of lecithin-induced fengycin lipopeptides against Cucumber mosaic virus. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 155, 104910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Evaluation of the virulence of Rhizoctonia sp. RhiCa-2 on cabbage leaves. Mycelial plugs of R. solani AG-1 IA, RhiCa-2, or AG-4 HG-I+II were inoculated onto detached leaves of the cabbage cultivar Seirin placed in Petri dishes lined with moist filter paper. Photographs were taken at 1, 2, 3, and 6 dpi.
Figure 1. Evaluation of the virulence of Rhizoctonia sp. RhiCa-2 on cabbage leaves. Mycelial plugs of R. solani AG-1 IA, RhiCa-2, or AG-4 HG-I+II were inoculated onto detached leaves of the cabbage cultivar Seirin placed in Petri dishes lined with moist filter paper. Photographs were taken at 1, 2, 3, and 6 dpi.
Life 16 00998 g001
Figure 2. Evaluation of foliar treatment of soybean lecithin for suppressing disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani in plants. (AC) Different concentrations of lecithin (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%) were sprayed onto detached leaves of cabbage (A), rice (B), and Brachypodium distachyon (C), and photographs were taken at 6 days post-inoculation. Representative images are shown for each concentration, and the corresponding lesion areas are presented as bar graphs below. A spreader-only solution and the fungicide pencycuron were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences, as assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Evaluation of foliar treatment of soybean lecithin for suppressing disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani in plants. (AC) Different concentrations of lecithin (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%) were sprayed onto detached leaves of cabbage (A), rice (B), and Brachypodium distachyon (C), and photographs were taken at 6 days post-inoculation. Representative images are shown for each concentration, and the corresponding lesion areas are presented as bar graphs below. A spreader-only solution and the fungicide pencycuron were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences, as assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (p < 0.01).
Life 16 00998 g002
Figure 3. Detection of hyphae of Rhizoctonia solani isolates on plant leaves treated with different concentrations of soybean lecithin. Detached leaves of cabbage (upper), rice (middle), and Brachypodium distachyon (lower) were sprayed with 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, or 5.0% lecithin, and photographs were taken at 6 days post-inoculation with R. solani isolates. RhiCa-2 was used for cabbage, and AG-1 IA was used for rice and B. distachyon. Inoculated leaves were collected at 4, 8, and 3 dpi for cabbage, rice, and B. distachyon, respectively, fixed, stained with trypan blue, and observed using a stereo microscope.
Figure 3. Detection of hyphae of Rhizoctonia solani isolates on plant leaves treated with different concentrations of soybean lecithin. Detached leaves of cabbage (upper), rice (middle), and Brachypodium distachyon (lower) were sprayed with 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, or 5.0% lecithin, and photographs were taken at 6 days post-inoculation with R. solani isolates. RhiCa-2 was used for cabbage, and AG-1 IA was used for rice and B. distachyon. Inoculated leaves were collected at 4, 8, and 3 dpi for cabbage, rice, and B. distachyon, respectively, fixed, stained with trypan blue, and observed using a stereo microscope.
Life 16 00998 g003
Figure 4. Direct effect of lecithin on hyphal elongation of R. solani AG-1 IA. Lecithin solutions at different concentrations (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%), each containing 0.1% (v/v) spreader, were sprayed onto a cellophane membrane placed on water agar. An inoculum of R. solani AG-1 IA was placed at the center of the membrane, and the diameter of the mycelial colony was measured daily. Water containing only the spreader was used as the control. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test against the 0% (untreated) control at each time point. Asterisks indicate significant differences from the 0% control: *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001, ****, p < 0.0001; n.s., not significant.
Figure 4. Direct effect of lecithin on hyphal elongation of R. solani AG-1 IA. Lecithin solutions at different concentrations (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%), each containing 0.1% (v/v) spreader, were sprayed onto a cellophane membrane placed on water agar. An inoculum of R. solani AG-1 IA was placed at the center of the membrane, and the diameter of the mycelial colony was measured daily. Water containing only the spreader was used as the control. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test against the 0% (untreated) control at each time point. Asterisks indicate significant differences from the 0% control: *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001, ****, p < 0.0001; n.s., not significant.
Life 16 00998 g004
Figure 5. Phytotoxic activity of soybean lecithin on Brachypodium distachyon. Different concentrations of lecithin (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%) were sprayed onto detached leaves of B. distachyon, and photographs were taken at 6 days post-treatment. Water and a solution containing only the spreader were used as controls.
Figure 5. Phytotoxic activity of soybean lecithin on Brachypodium distachyon. Different concentrations of lecithin (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%) were sprayed onto detached leaves of B. distachyon, and photographs were taken at 6 days post-treatment. Water and a solution containing only the spreader were used as controls.
Life 16 00998 g005
Figure 6. Evaluation of foliar treatment of egg lecithin for suppressing disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani in Brachypodium distachyon and cabbage. (A,B) Different concentrations of lecithin (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%) were sprayed onto detached leaves of B. distachyon (A) and cabbage (B), and photographs were taken at 6 days post-inoculation. Representative images are shown for each concentration, and the corresponding lesion areas are presented as bar graphs below. A spreader-only solution and the fungicide pencycuron were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences, as assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (p < 0.01).
Figure 6. Evaluation of foliar treatment of egg lecithin for suppressing disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani in Brachypodium distachyon and cabbage. (A,B) Different concentrations of lecithin (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0%) were sprayed onto detached leaves of B. distachyon (A) and cabbage (B), and photographs were taken at 6 days post-inoculation. Representative images are shown for each concentration, and the corresponding lesion areas are presented as bar graphs below. A spreader-only solution and the fungicide pencycuron were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences, as assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test (p < 0.01).
Life 16 00998 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cuong, T.X.; Asano, M.; Honma, D.; Soeda, M.; Watanabe, M.; Sakata, N.; Matsui, H.; Toyoda, K.; Ichinose, Y.; Ikeda, K.; et al. Disease-Suppressive Activity of Lecithin Against Foliar Infection by Rhizoctonia solani Isolates in Cabbage, Rice, and Brachypodium distachyon. Life 2026, 16, 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16060998

AMA Style

Cuong TX, Asano M, Honma D, Soeda M, Watanabe M, Sakata N, Matsui H, Toyoda K, Ichinose Y, Ikeda K, et al. Disease-Suppressive Activity of Lecithin Against Foliar Infection by Rhizoctonia solani Isolates in Cabbage, Rice, and Brachypodium distachyon. Life. 2026; 16(6):998. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16060998

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cuong, Tran Xuan, Misaki Asano, Daiki Honma, Moeko Soeda, Megumi Watanabe, Nanami Sakata, Hidenori Matsui, Kazuhiro Toyoda, Yuki Ichinose, Kentaro Ikeda, and et al. 2026. "Disease-Suppressive Activity of Lecithin Against Foliar Infection by Rhizoctonia solani Isolates in Cabbage, Rice, and Brachypodium distachyon" Life 16, no. 6: 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16060998

APA Style

Cuong, T. X., Asano, M., Honma, D., Soeda, M., Watanabe, M., Sakata, N., Matsui, H., Toyoda, K., Ichinose, Y., Ikeda, K., & Noutoshi, Y. (2026). Disease-Suppressive Activity of Lecithin Against Foliar Infection by Rhizoctonia solani Isolates in Cabbage, Rice, and Brachypodium distachyon. Life, 16(6), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16060998

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop