Next Article in Journal
Chemical Routes to Primitive Membranes: Prebiotic Lipid Formation at the Origin of Life
Next Article in Special Issue
Management of Retinoblastoma: A Challenge in Pediatric Ophthalmology
Previous Article in Journal
Talocalcaneal Coalition: Current Concepts, Clinical Implications, and Management Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combined Pharmacological and Pneumatic Displacement Therapy for Sub-Macular Haemorrhage Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Case Series and Review of the Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biomarkers of Preclinical Diabetic Retinopathy Detected by OCT Angiography—A Descriptive Review

Dobry Wzrok Ophthalmological Center, 80-392 Gdansk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2026, 16(3), 496; https://doi.org/10.3390/life16030496
Submission received: 15 February 2026 / Revised: 15 March 2026 / Accepted: 17 March 2026 / Published: 18 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eye Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss worldwide. Microvascular changes precede clinically detectable DR, creating an opportunity for early diagnosis and intervention. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) enables noninvasive, quantitative assessments of retinal and choroidal microcirculation and has emerged as a promising tool for identifying early biomarkers of DR. The goal of this study was to review the literature on OCTA-derived biomarkers associated with preclinical diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: This descriptive literature review summarizes current evidence regarding OCTA-derived biomarkers associated with preclinical diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A search of the PubMed/MEDLINE database was performed to identify original studies published between 2015 and 2025 evaluating OCTA parameters in diabetic patients without clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy. The findings were synthesized qualitatively due to methodological heterogeneity among studies in terms of OCTA devices, imaging protocols, and analyzed parameters. Results: The reviewed studies consistently reported early microvascular abnormalities detectable by OCTA prior to the development of clinically visible diabetic retinopathy. The most frequently described changes included reduced vessel density (VD) and perfusion parameters, enlargement and increased irregularity of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), areas of capillary non-perfusion, and alterations in vascular network geometry and complexity. These changes were most consistently observed in the deep capillary plexus (DCP), suggesting that this vascular layer may be particularly susceptible to early diabetic microvascular damage. Conclusions: This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of OCTA-derived biomarkers associated with early retinal microvascular alterations in diabetic patients without clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy. By integrating findings from recent studies, the review highlights the potential role of OCTA in identifying preclinical microvascular changes and discusses current methodological challenges and future research directions.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is a global metabolic disease with increasing prevalence, constituting one of the main causes of morbidity and premature mortality worldwide. In recent decades, a continuous increase in the number of diabetes cases has been observed, which is associated with the epidemic of obesity, population aging, urbanization, and lifestyle changes [1]. According to the latest 11th edition of the IDF Diabetes Atlas 2025 published by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), in 2024 approximately 589 million adults (aged 20–79 years) were living with diabetes worldwide, corresponding to about 11.1% of the global adult population.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounts for the vast majority of diabetes cases worldwide and is strongly associated with obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and population aging [1,2,3]. In contrast, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) typically develops at a younger age and results from the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells, leading to absolute insulin deficiency. Because patients with T1DM are exposed to chronic hyperglycemia for a longer period of time, this population may represent a valuable clinical model for studying early microvascular changes in diabetes. In T2DM, retinal microvascular alterations may additionally reflect the influence of systemic comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity. These differences should be considered when interpreting OCTA-derived biomarkers.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most common microvascular complications of diabetes and remains a major cause of vision loss among working-age adults [4,5]. Importantly, microvascular and neurodegenerative retinal changes may develop before clinically visible lesions are detected during routine fundus examination or color fundus photography. This stage is commonly referred to as preclinical diabetic retinopathy, defined as the phase in which no clinically detectable signs of DR are present despite the presence of subtle retinal abnormalities that may be identified using more sensitive imaging modalities, such as recently introduced optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

OCT Angiography (OCTA)

Traditionally, diabetic retinopathy was diagnosed using fluorescein angiography (FA) and, subsequently, optical coherence tomography (OCT). For many years, FA has been considered the gold standard for evaluating retinal vascular abnormalities in diabetic retinopathy. It provides dynamic information about vascular leakage and perfusion; however, it is invasive, requires intravenous dye administration, and may be associated with adverse reactions. In contrast, OCTA is a noninvasive technique that enables the rapid visualization of retinal capillary networks and a quantitative assessment of microvascular parameters such as vessel density and the foveal avascular zone.
OCT has become a fundamental imaging modality in modern ophthalmology, enabling a noninvasive, high-resolution cross-sectional visualization of retinal structures. OCTA was introduced as an extension of OCT technology, allowing depth-resolved visualization of retinal and choroidal microvasculature without the need for dye injection.
Despite these advantages, OCTA also has important limitations. Unlike FA, OCTA does not directly visualize vascular leakage and may be affected by image artifacts, segmentation errors, and variability between devices. Therefore, OCTA should be considered a complementary imaging modality that provides detailed structural and microvascular information but does not fully replace conventional angiographic techniques.
The goal of this review was to evaluate OCTA biomarkers used for the detection and assessment of preclinical diabetic retinopathy, with particular emphasis on their clinical relevance and usefulness in ophthalmological practice

2. Materials and Methods

A literature search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE database to identify studies investigating OCTA-derived biomarkers in patients with diabetes without clinically apparent diabetic retinopathy. The search strategy combined terms related to optical coherence tomography angiography (e.g., “OCTA”, “optical coherence tomography angiography”) and diabetic retinal disease (e.g., “diabetic retinopathy”, “early diabetic retinal changes”, “preclinical diabetic retinopathy”, and “microvascular alterations”). In addition, the reference lists of eligible articles were manually screened to identify further relevant publications. The flow-chart of the study selection process is illustrated in Figure 1.
Original research articles were included if they met the following criteria:
(1)
Evaluation of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus;
(2)
Inclusion of patients without clinically apparent diabetic retinopathy or explicitly defined preclinical/no-DR stages;
(3)
Use of OCTA to assess retinal and/or choroidal microcirculation;
(4)
Reporting of quantitative OCTA parameters, such as vessel density, perfusion density, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) metrics, ischemic indices, or choriocapillaris flow parameters;
(5)
Inclusion of adult and/or pediatric populations.
Review articles, case reports, conference abstracts, animal studies, and studies without quantitative OCTA analysis were excluded.
Given the methodological heterogeneity across published studies, including differences in OCTA devices, image processing algorithms, definitions of preclinical diabetic retinopathy, and reported vascular parameters, a descriptive review design was chosen. This approach allows a qualitative synthesis of the existing evidence and facilitates discussion of emerging OCTA biomarkers and their potential role in the early detection of diabetic retinal microvascular changes.
It should be noted that the definition of preclinical or no-diabetic-retinopathy (no-DR) status varied across the included studies. In most cases, this stage was defined as the absence of clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy based on fundus examination or color fundus photography, although the exact grading protocols and inclusion criteria differed between studies. Because of this variability, the present review focuses on identifying general trends in OCTA-derived biomarkers rather than performing direct quantitative comparisons between individual studies.
Because this work was designed as a narrative review and the included studies showed substantial methodological heterogeneity in imaging protocols, OCTA devices, and reported biomarkers, a formal risk-of-bias assessment was not performed. Therefore, the findings of this review should be interpreted with caution.
As this study was based exclusively on previously published data, no institutional review board approval or informed consent was required.

3. Results

Following our search in all databases, 845 articles were identified. After the removal of duplicates and evaluation of the titles and abstracts, 463 remained. Finally, based on the inclusion criteria and assessment of full text articles, 24 articles that were published in the years 2015–2025 were included in the study.
After an evaluation of the most frequently described OCTA parameters in diabetic retinopathy, the review concentrated on the following categories: vessel density and retinal perfusion, foveal avascular zone, ischemia and areas of non-perfusion, microaneurysms, blood flow parameters, retinal layer thickness, choriocapillaris and choroid, parameters of vascular geometry, and network complexity and other factors.
Most authors described changes in the retina in patients with both early and advanced diabetic retinopathy, but few authors included changes in patients with preclinical diabetic retinopathy in their studies.
Most publications were based on a small research group focusing mainly on T2DM. Among all the publications analyzed, only a few authors described groups of more than 100 patients [6,7,8,9].
A significant limitation of the available data was the lack of longitudinal studies assessing the dynamics of microcirculatory changes in patients with long-standing T1DM without DR. Most publications concerned patients with type 2 diabetes or included short follow-up periods [4,5,8,9]. Meanwhile, T1DM, due to the long duration of the disease and often the absence of other comorbidities, such as hypertension, is a unique model for analyzing early, subclinical retinal changes [4,10].

3.1. Most Frequently Described OCTA Parameters in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

The development of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has enabled noninvasive, quantitative assessments of retinal and choroidal microcirculation in patients with diabetes mellitus, including at the very early stages of the disease, even before the appearance of clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy [11,12,13,14,15] (Table 1). In recent years, numerous cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have demonstrated that OCTA reveals subtle disturbances in perfusion and capillary network architecture in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, even in groups without clinically diagnosed DR [6,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].

3.2. Vessel Density and Retinal Perfusion

The most frequently analyzed OCTA parameter in diabetes mellitus is vessel density (VD) and related perfusion indices [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,15,16,17,21,22,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,40,41,42]. Numerous studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in macular VD in patients with diabetes compared with healthy individuals [4,5,9,10,16,21,22,28,29,30,41,42].
Importantly, many studies indicate that these disturbances primarily affect the deep capillary plexus (DCP), while the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) initially remains relatively preserved [4,9,10,16,17,18,29,30,40,41]. This selective reduction of VD in the DCP has been observed in both adults and children or adolescents with diabetes without clinical signs of DR, suggesting that the DCP is the most vulnerable vascular plexus to early diabetic damage [6,9,10,16].
It is believed that deeper retinal vessels are more susceptible to damage in the course of diabetes mellitus. Numerous studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between the duration of diabetes and VD values in the DCP [9,10,16,29,40,41,42].
The deep capillary plexus appears particularly vulnerable in early diabetic microangiopathy due to several structural and physiological factors. The DCP is located within deeper layers of the inner retina, where oxygen tension is relatively lower and metabolic demand is high, making this region more susceptible to hypoxic injury and metabolic stress. In early diabetes, microvascular dysfunction develops, including endothelial damage, impaired autoregulation, and increased capillary pressure. These alterations may disproportionately affect the DCP because of its anatomical position and relatively limited collateral circulation, which reduces the ability of this vascular layer to compensate for perfusion disturbances [34,35].
Several studies indicate that microvascular alterations within the deep retinal vascular layer may occur earlier in the course of diabetes [4,9,10,16,29,40,41]. Most investigations suggest that the DCP is particularly vulnerable to early diabetic damage. However, early alterations in the SCP have also been reported in patients without clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy [4,5,6,7,9]. With disease progression and the development of clinically manifest DR, further reductions in vessel density are observed in the SCP, and the magnitude of VD reduction in both plexuses correlates with the severity of clinical disease [28,29,30,32,41,42]. Longitudinal studies have demonstrated that a decrease in vessel density, particularly in the DCP, may precede the onset of clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy and may therefore serve as a potential prognostic biomarker.
Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) exhibited significantly lower VD values in the DCP compared with patients with DR without DME, and a negative correlation was observed between vessel density across the entire SCP area and visual acuity [28,29,30,32,41]. A reduction in VD in the DCP may represent an earlier marker of DR in patients with diabetes mellitus than FAZ enlargement [4,9,10,25,40].

Clinical Relevance for Preclinical DR

A reduction in VD in the DCP, even when values remain close to the lower limit of normal, represents one of the earliest and most reproducible markers of preclinical diabetic retinopathy.

3.3. Foveal Avascular Zone

An important area of OCTA analysis is the foveal avascular zone. Numerous publications have demonstrated an enlargement of the FAZ area and increased FAZ irregularity in patients with diabetes mellitus, including groups without clinical DR [4,9,17,31,33]. Beyond FAZ area alone, increasing attention has been given to FAZ shape indices, such as perimeter, circularity index, and acircularity index, which appear to be more sensitive to early microvascular changes than simple FAZ area measurement. Some authors have reported FAZ enlargement in both the SCP and DCP in patients with diabetes without DR [4,9,17,31]. There are also many studies describing no significant differences in FAZ parameters in patients with diabetes without DR compared with control groups [6,7,10], as well as FAZ enlargement in the DCP in patients with diabetes across all disease stages [4,9,17,31].
Inconsistencies exist in the literature regarding the diagnostic utility and specificity of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) enlargement as a biomarker of preclinical diabetic retinopathy. The FAZ area exhibits substantial inter-individual variability in healthy eyes [36], resulting in a considerable overlap between diabetic and non-diabetic populations and thereby limiting its discriminatory value. Some studies report significant FAZ enlargement in patients with prediabetes or diabetes without clinically detectable retinopathy [37,38], whereas others describe only modest or non-significant differences, particularly in the deep capillary plexus. These discrepancies may also be explained by methodological factors, including differences in OCTA devices, scan sizes, segmentation algorithms, and FAZ measurement protocols.
A positive correlation between FAZ size and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) has been demonstrated [28,30,32], particularly pronounced in patients with diabetic macular edema [29,30,41].
Manual FAZ segmentation is characterized by high variability [43], and segmentation errors have represented a limitation to its use as a biomarker [44,45]. Some authors have proposed the use of automated algorithms for FAZ delineation and diagnostic evaluation [43,45,46].
In healthy individuals, the FAZ is circular or elliptical in shape. Its area measured by OCTA averages in the range 0.25–0.35 mm2 in the SCP and 0.40–0.60 mm2 in the DCP, with significant variability depending on the OCTA device and segmentation algorithm used [17,34,45].
The FAZ area increases with age and is also larger in individuals with myopia or arterial hypertension [17,34,45]. A reduction in vessel density in the immediate vicinity of the FAZ (peri-FAZ vessel density) has been described as one of the earliest markers of macular ischemia and often precedes a clear enlargement of the avascular zone itself.

3.4. Ischemia and Areas of Non-Perfusion

Another important group of OCTA biomarkers comprises indicators of retinal ischemia, including areas of capillary non-perfusion, capillary dropout or closure, and the presence of flow voids. Studies demonstrate that these changes appear early—particularly within the deep capillary plexus—and increase in extent with the progression of diabetic retinopathy [4,9,10,28,29,30,41,42].
Widefield OCTA analyses have shown that the extent of ischemia beyond the macular region correlates with the risk of progression to advanced stages of diabetic retinopathy, including proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Parameters such as the ischemic index are increasingly proposed as tools for clinical risk stratification.

3.5. Microaneurysms and Vascular Activity

OCTA also enables the visualization of microaneurysms, including their number, location, and the presence of flow within their lumen. Although microaneurysms are classically associated with fluorescein angiography, multiple studies have demonstrated that OCTA allows the assessment of their morphology and hemodynamic activity, particularly within the deep vascular plexuses. The presence of a flow signal within microaneurysms is interpreted as a marker of disease activity and may have prognostic significance [29,32,47]. Microaneurysms have been recognized as one of the most useful indicators in international diabetic retinopathy severity scales [48].
OCTA studies have shown that microaneurysms are distributed across all retinal vascular plexuses, although the majority are visible in the DCP and intermediate capillary plexus (ICP). Histopathological studies localize microaneurysms primarily within the inner nuclear layer (INL), which contains the lower portion of the ICP and the upper portion of the DCP. Dubow et al. classified microaneurysms into saccular, fusiform, mixed, pedunculated, irregular, and focal bulging types. Irregular, fusiform, and mixed microaneurysms demonstrated the greatest tendency toward leakage [47,49].

3.6. Blood Flow Parameters

Reduced retinal blood flow has been demonstrated in both humans and animal models with early diabetes mellitus. This phenomenon has been linked to increased diacylglycerol (DAG) levels and activation of protein kinase C-β isoforms [50]. As diabetic retinopathy progresses, blood flow increases, suggesting that initial flow resistance occurs at the level of retinal arterioles and capillaries, potentially due to increased endothelin-1 expression and elevated VEGF production secondary to hypoxia [50]. Flow values are measured as the percentage of pixels with flow signal relative to the total number of pixels in the analyzed area [11]. Studies have demonstrated a reduction of this parameter in all examined SCP and DCP regions [28,29,30,41,42]. Flow parameters within the inferior macular sector have been shown to exhibit greater sensitivity in identifying high-risk groups. This is attributed to the fact that this region undergoes embryological closure around the 34th week of gestation and consists of small ganglion cell axons [28,29,41].

3.7. Retinal Layer Thickness

In preclinical and mild stages of diabetic retinopathy, a reduction in retinal layer thickness has been observed [6,10,16], whereas in moderate stages of DR, retinal thickness increases [28,29,41]. Some studies have reported no significant differences in retinal thickness between patients with diabetes without DR and healthy control subjects [6,7]. Other studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness in the outer macular region in patients with diabetes without DR, and in the inner macular region in patients with mild DR. Thinning of the GCIPL in patients with diabetes without DR has been attributed mainly to ganglion cell layer (GCL) thinning, whereas changes observed in mild DR were associated with thinning of the inner plexiform layer (IPL).
The ganglion cell layer consists predominantly of retinal ganglion cell bodies and represents a critical component of the inner retina responsible for visual signal transmission. Increasing evidence suggests that neurodegenerative processes may occur in the diabetic retina before the onset of clinically detectable microvascular abnormalities. Structural alterations in the inner retinal layers, including thinning of the ganglion cell layer and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer complex, have been reported in diabetic patients without clinically apparent diabetic retinopathy, supporting the concept that retinal neurodegeneration may precede the classical vascular manifestations of the disease [51].
More broadly, mechanisms of retinal ganglion cell degeneration have also been investigated in other retinal diseases, including glaucoma, highlighting the vulnerability of inner retinal neurons to metabolic and cellular stress [52].
These findings highlight the potential value of advanced retinal imaging techniques, such as OCT and OCTA, for detecting early neurovascular alterations in diabetes.
The IPL contains numerous synapses connecting dendrites with bipolar and amacrine cells and is affected later, when retinopathy becomes clinically apparent [28,29,41].
In eyes with moderate DR, increased retinal thickness has been observed across all macular regions, involving the full thickness of the macula. Layer-specific analysis revealed that thickening occurs mainly in the INL and outer nuclear layer (ONL), with an increase in GCIPL thickness—particularly in the IPL [28,29,41]. Moderate DR is associated with the presence of microaneurysms, more than 80% of which are located within the INL [47]. It is also suggested that thickening of these layers may result from cytotoxic neuronal edema secondary to ischemia, in the absence of visible vascular leakage [50]. The presence of vascular leakage triggers an inflammatory response, including infiltration by inflammatory cells (microglia), which may further increase edema [50].
Some studies did not demonstrate changes in ONL and INL thickness in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) without DME; however, these studies were based on small patient cohorts. Seven-year longitudinal studies confirmed an increase in inner retinal thickness from the inner limiting membrane (ILM) to the outer plexiform layer (OPL) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without DME [42]. Other authors reported a 4.1% increase in IPL-ONL complex thickness in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus compared with control subjects [6].

3.8. Choriocapillaris and Choroid

An increasing number of studies focus on the assessment of the choroid and choriocapillaris using OCTA. In patients with diabetes mellitus, including those without clinically evident diabetic retinopathy, an increased proportion of areas with choriocapillaris flow deficit has been described, suggesting that choroidal involvement may occur very early in the disease course. In patients with diabetes, the presence of microaneurysms, vascular dilations, as well as vessel closure or structural modifications such as increased tortuosity, has been observed in the choroid [15,21,22].
Longitudinal studies have demonstrated that choriocapillaris perfusion disturbances may be associated with an increased risk of developing diabetic retinopathy requiring treatment as well as diabetic macular edema. In patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus without diabetic retinopathy, thinning of choroidal thickness has been reported [6,53]. Some studies found no changes in choriocapillaris vessel density in patients with diabetes without DR, while a decrease in choriocapillaris vessel density was observed with DR progression [15,21]. Other studies have shown that during a one-year follow-up of patients with diabetes without DR, an increase in choroidal thickness was observed, which was attributed to the presence of choroidal vasculopathy [53]. Choriocapillaris vessel density was significantly associated with diastolic blood pressure in the group of patients with diabetes without DR [15].

3.9. Parameters of Vascular Geometry and Network Complexity

In addition to classical measures of vessel density and perfusion, the literature increasingly analyzes parameters describing vascular network geometry, such as vessel tortuosity, vascular length density (VLD) [22,30], fractal dimension (FD) [39], lacunarity, and vascular complexity indices, including measures of sphericity and cylindricity of vessels [36]. Fractal dimension is a quantitative parameter describing the geometric complexity of the retinal vascular network, whereas lacunarity reflects the spatial heterogeneity and distribution of gaps within that network.
Studies indicate that a reduction in topological complexity of the capillary network and an increase in its heterogeneity may represent very early markers of subclinical diabetic microangiopathy [30,39]. A decrease in FD, parafoveal vessel density (PVD), and parafoveal vessel length density (PVLD) in the superficial capillary plexus, along with an increase in blood vessel tortuosity (BVT), was significantly associated with an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy. A reduction in FD was found to be more significant than increased BVT [39]. Fractal dimension may represent a highly valuable quantitative parameter for assessing microvascular damage across different stages of diabetic retinopathy [39]. Li et al. demonstrated a reduction in VLD in patients with diabetes mellitus without diabetic retinopathy [19].

3.10. Other OCTA-Derived Parameters

An interesting parameter described by Ragkousis et al. is FD-300, defined as vessel density measured within 300 µm from the foveal center. This parameter was shown to be the most discriminative for detecting early changes [8].
Viggiano et al. reported a reduction in perfusion density (PD) in both the superficial and deep capillary plexuses in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy compared with healthy individuals [24]. The greatest reduction was observed in the temporal sector. Earlier studies also identified the temporal region as the most sensitive area for predicting mild NPDR [28,29,41].
In prospective studies, Sun et al. demonstrated that FAZ parameters, vessel density, and flow rate (FR) in the deep capillary plexus may predict disease progression, whereas vessel density in the superficial capillary plexus was associated with the development of diabetic macular edema [54].
The impact of type 1 diabetes mellitus on large systemic vessels has also been investigated, focusing on the carotid artery and the presence of microvascular retinal changes. A reduction in mean vessel density values in both the SCP and DCP was observed in patients with type 1 diabetes compared with control subjects, along with an increase in mean thickness of the middle and inner carotid artery wall as a marker of diabetic macroangiopathy [6].
Correlations have also been described between diabetic retinopathy-type changes and serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which may serve as a marker distinguishing patients with diabetic maculopathy from those without, as well as patients with diabetic retinopathy from those without retinopathy [55,56].

3.10.1. Preclinical DR in T1DM—Clinical Data

As presented in Table 2, the majority of OCTA studies in patients with T1DM without diabetic retinopathy demonstrated measurable microcirculatory abnormalities compared with healthy individuals. These changes were observed regardless of patient age and included both adult patients with T1DM and children and adolescents. The presence of these abnormalities in pediatric patients emphasizes that microangiopathic processes may begin very early in the disease course, even in the absence of any clinical symptoms.

3.10.2. Pediatric Populations—Clinical Significance

Table 2 clearly distinguishes studies involving children and adolescents with T1DM. In this group, reduced vessel density—particularly in the deep capillary plexus—as well as FAZ alterations were also observed compared with control groups. This is of particular clinical relevance because it involves patients with short disease duration and no clinical signs of retinopathy.
In children with type 1 diabetes mellitus without clinical diabetic retinopathy, OCTA studies consistently demonstrate reduced vessel density in both the superficial and deep capillary plexuses, particularly in the parafoveal and peripapillary regions, compared with healthy controls [6,19]. These changes are typically subtle and may precede the development of clinically detectable retinopathy [19]. Parameters such as the foveal avascular zone area, FAZ perimeter, acircularity index, and foveal vessel density have been shown to be sensitive indicators of early microvascular alterations in pediatric populations [6,18].
In adults and young adults with T1DM, similar OCTA-derived metrics are evaluated; however, microvascular abnormalities are often more pronounced. Studies frequently report greater reductions in parafoveal vessel density, larger FAZ area, and more marked alterations in foveal vascular density [18]. Moreover, the association between higher HbA1c levels and microvascular impairment appears stronger in adults [18], and early onset of diabetes may be associated with more severe alterations in vessel density and FAZ-related parameters. In addition, volumetric OCTA imaging may reveal perfusion defects in the deep capillary plexus before clinically detectable retinopathy in adults, which may be less apparent in conventional two-dimensional scans.

3.10.3. Importance of Methodology and Normative Data

A comparison of preclinical T1DM study results with normative data highlights the crucial role of methodological standardization in OCTA interpretation. As shown in normative studies, FAZ and vessel density values depend on age, OCTA system, scan size, and segmentation algorithms. Therefore, even small deviations from normal ranges—particularly in the deep capillary plexus—may be clinically meaningful in the context of preclinical diabetic retinopathy when interpreted with these factors in mind.
The combined analysis of the data presented in Table 2 indicates that patients with T1DM without clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy exhibit early, measurable disturbances in retinal microcirculation. These changes most commonly include reduced vessel density in the deep capillary plexus and alterations in FAZ parameters. The consistency of these observations across adult and pediatric populations confirms that preclinical DR in T1DM represents a significant and clinically relevant disease stage, in which OCTA may play a key role in assessing the risk of further progression.
Below are studies exclusively involving diabetes mellitus without clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy (preclinical/no DR).

3.10.4. Conclusion (Preclinical DR)

The earliest changes involve reduced vessel density (VD), particularly in the deep capillary plexus, and FAZ enlargement. These changes occur before the development of clinically visible diabetic retinopathy in both T1DM and T2DM.

3.10.5. Limitations

Despite the growing number of publications, the interpretation of OCTA findings in T1DM remains challenging.
Significant heterogeneity exists regarding OCTA devices, acquisition protocols, scan sizes, and segmentation algorithms. Additionally, manual or semi-automated delineations of FAZ and vascular plexus boundaries introduce observer-dependent variability.
Segmentation sensitivity represents an additional important source of variability in OCTA analysis. Even small shifts in the boundary between the superficial and deep vascular plexuses may substantially influence quantitative measurements; for example, FAZ area may change by up to approximately 15% per 10 μm displacement of the segmentation boundary. This issue is particularly relevant for the analysis of the deep capillary plexus (DCP), where segmentation errors and projection artifacts may affect the accuracy of OCTA-derived parameters [58].
Several limitations of the currently available literature should be acknowledged. First, substantial methodological and clinical heterogeneity exists among studies investigating OCTA-derived biomarkers in diabetic patients without clinically detectable retinopathy. Differences in the definition of preclinical or no-diabetic-retinopathy stages, imaging protocols, OCTA devices, segmentation algorithms, and manual or semi-automated delineations of FAZ and vascular plexus may contribute to variability in reported microvascular parameters, such as vessel density or foveal avascular zone metrics [59].
Additionally, different OCTA platforms (e.g., Optovue (Fremont, CA, USA), Zeiss (Jena, Germany), and Topcon (Tokyo, Japan))) employ distinct hardware configurations, scanning protocols, segmentation algorithms, and proprietary image-processing methods, which may lead to variability in quantitative measurements such as vessel density or the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area. Consequently, FAZ measurements may vary significantly between OCTA devices, and the obtained values are not always directly interchangeable across studies. These differences are both device- and layer-specific and may substantially influence the interpretation of OCTA-derived metrics. Therefore, standardization of acquisition and analysis protocols is essential for reliable comparisons in longitudinal and multicenter studies [60,61].
In addition, the studied populations vary considerably, including both pediatric and adult patients as well as individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, which differ in age of onset, disease duration, and associated systemic risk factors.
Systemic variables such as glycemic control, hypertension, and diabetes duration may further influence retinal microvascular alterations and act as potential confounders.
Another important limitation is that most available studies are cross-sectional in design, which limits the ability to determine causal relationships or the predictive value of OCTA-derived biomarkers for the development of diabetic retinopathy.
Furthermore, due to the narrative nature of this review and the heterogeneity of included studies, a formal risk-of-bias assessment was not performed. Future well-designed prospective longitudinal studies are therefore needed to clarify the temporal relationship between early retinal microvascular alterations and the onset of clinically detectable diabetic retinopathy.

4. Conclusions

The collected data indicate that OCTA reveals retinal and choroidal microcirculatory changes at a stage preceding the clinical diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Particularly significant are the selective involvement of the deep capillary plexus, alterations within the FAZ, and early areas of non-perfusion. OCTA parameters show potential for identifying patients at high risk of disease progression, monitoring disease course, and—prospectively—personalizing screening and therapeutic strategies.
Patients in whom clinically visible retinopathy has not yet developed represent the greatest therapeutic opportunity for preserving vision. Therefore, the development of sensitive and predictive retinal measurement methods capable of identifying individuals at risk of developing retinal changes would be highly valuable.
Early changes in diabetic retinopathy respond better to treatment; thus, identifying high-risk groups based on noninvasive OCTA examinations would be particularly beneficial. Considering the increasing incidence and prevalence of diabetes mellitus, opportunities for primary and secondary prevention are becoming increasingly limited. In many aspects of life, including healthcare, the use of artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly necessary.
Given the capabilities of OCTA and its noninvasive nature, it is anticipated that appropriate algorithms will soon enable faster and more accurate identification of patients with diabetes mellitus who are at risk of developing diabetic retinopathy, allowing timely implementation of appropriate treatment strategies.
Much work still lies ahead. We hope that the time required to identify the most sensitive biomarker and implement it into daily clinical practice will arrive sooner than expected.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CCChoriocapillaris
DCPDeep capillary plexus
DMEDiabetic macular edema
DRDiabetic retinopathy
FAZ Foveal avascular zone
FDFractal dimension
FD%Choriocapillaris flow deficit
GCIPLGanglion cell–inner plexiform layer
ICPIntermediate capillary plexus
NPDRNon-proliferative diabetic retinopathy
OCTAOptical Coherence Tomography Angiography
PCDPerfused capillary density
PDPerfusion density
RNFLRetinal nerve fiber layer
SCPSuperficial capillary plexus
T1DMType 1 diabetes mellitus
T2DMType 2 diabetes mellitus
VDVessel density
VEGFVascular endothelial growth factor
VLDVessel length density

References

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 11th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandrasekaran, P.; Ghosh, S. The role of obesity in type 2 diabetes mellitus—An updated review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ogle, G.D.; Wang, F.; Haynes, A.; Gregory, G.A.; King, T.W.; Deng, K.; Dabelea, D.; James, S.; Jenkins, A.J.; Li, X.; et al. Global type 1 diabetes prevalence, incidence, and mortality estimates 2025: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Atlas 11th edition and the T1D Index Version 3.0. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2025, 225, 112277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cao, D.; Yang, D.; Huang, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L. Optical coherence tomography angiography discerns preclinical diabetic retinopathy in eyes of patients with type 2 diabetes without clinical diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol. 2018, 55, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Altinisik, M.; Kahraman, N.S.; Kurt, E.; Mayali, H.; Kayikcioglu, O. Quantitative analysis of early retinal vascular changes in type 2 diabetic patients without clinical retinopathy by optical coherence tomography angiography. Int. Ophthalmol. 2022, 42, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gołębiewska, J.; Olechowski, A.; Wysocka-Mincewicz, M.; Odrobina, D.; Baszyńska-Wilk, M.; Groszek, A.; Szalecki, M.; Hautz, W. Optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density in children with type 1 diabetes. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niestrata-Ortiz, M.; Fichna, P.; Stankiewicz, W.; Stopa, M. Enlargement of the foveal avascular zone detected by optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic children without diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2019, 257, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ragkousis, A.; Kozobolis, V.; Kabanarou, S.; Bontzos, G.; Mangouritsas, G.; Heliopoulos, I.; Chatziralli, I. Vessel density around the foveal avascular zone as a potential imaging biomarker for detecting preclinical diabetic retinopathy. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2020, 35, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, J.Y.; Wang, Q.; Yan, Y.N.; Zhou, W.J.; Wang, Y.X.; Wu, S.L.; Yuan, M.X.; Bin Wei, W.; Jonas, J.B. Microvascular retinal changes in preclinical diabetic retinopathy detected by optical coherence tomographic angiography. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020, 258, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Carnevali, A.; Sacconi, R.; Corbelli, E.; Tomasso, L.; Querques, L.; Zerbini, G.; Scorcia, V.; Bandello, F.; Querques, G. Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of retinal vascular plexuses and choriocapillaris in patients with type 1 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol. 2017, 54, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jia, Y.; Tan, O.; Tokayer, J.; Potsaid, B.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.J.; Kraus, M.F.; Subhash, H.; Fujimoto, J.G.; Hornegger, J.; et al. Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express 2012, 3, 471–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fingler, J.; Schwartz, D.; Yang, C.; Fraser, S.E. Mobility and transverse flow visualization using phase variance optical coherence tomography. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 12636–12653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Spaide, R.F.; Klancnik, J.M., Jr.; Cooney, M.J. Retinal vascular layers imaged by optical coherence tomography angiography. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015, 133, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. de Carlo, T.E.; Romano, A.; Waheed, N.K.; Duker, J.S. A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Int. J. Retin. Vitr. 2015, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Conti, F.F.; Qin, V.L.; Rodrigues, E.B.; Sharma, S.; Rachitskaya, A.V.; Ehlers, J.P.; Singh, R.P. Choriocapillaris and retinal vascular plexus density of diabetic eyes using optical coherence tomography angiography. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 103, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vujosevic, S.; Muraca, A.; Alkabes, M.; Villani, E.; Cavarzeran, F.; Rossetti, L.; De Cilla, S. Early microvascular and neural changes in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus without clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy. Retina 2019, 39, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dimitrova, G.; Chihara, E.; Takahashi, H.; Amano, H.; Okazaki, K. Quantitative retinal optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with diabetes without diabetic retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, B.; Chou, Y.; Zhao, X.; Yang, J.; Chen, Y. Early detection of microvascular impairments with optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic patients without clinical retinopathy: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 222, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, T.; Jia, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, A.; Gao, L.; Yang, C.; Zou, H. Retinal microvascular abnormalities in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus without visual impairment or diabetic retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 990–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Koca, S.B.; Akdogan, M.; Koca, S. Evaluation of early retinal vascular changes by optical coherence tomography angiography in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus without diabetic retinopathy. Int. Ophthalmol. 2022, 42, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sopeña-Pinilla, M.; Arias-Alvarez, M.; Lopez-Galvez, M.I.; Orduna-Hospital, E.; Fernandez-Espinosa, G.; Boned-Murillo, A.; Díaz-Barreda, M.D.; Tomas-Grasa, C.; Pinilla, I. Retinal vascular density and thickness in long-term type 1 diabetes without visible vascular signs of retinopathy. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sacconi, R.; Tombolini, B.; Cartabellotta, A.; Zerbini, G.; Bandello, F.; Querques, G. Structural and functional characterization of retinal impairment in T1DM patients without diabetic retinopathy: A 3-year longitudinal study. Acta Diabetol. 2024, 61, 1433–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Thompson, I.A.; Durrani, A.K.; Patel, S. Optical coherence tomography angiography characteristics in diabetic patients without clinical diabetic retinopathy. Eye 2019, 33, 648–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Viggiano, P.; Costanzo, E.; Giannini, D.; Fragiotta, S.; De Geronimo, D.; Giorno, P.; Picconi, F.; Frontoni, S.; Varano, M.; Parravano, M. In vivo assessment of associations between photoreceptor structure and macular perfusion in type 1 diabetes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 107, 1672–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vujosevic, S.; Midena, E. Retinal layers changes in human preclinical and early clinical diabetic retinopathy support early retinal neuronal and Müller cells alterations. J. Diabetes Res. 2013, 2013, 905058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Orduna-Hospital, E.; Perdices, L.; Sanchez-Cano, A.; Acha, J.; Cuenca, N.; Pinilla, I. Choroidal changes of long-term type 1 diabetic patients without retinopathy. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alam, M.; Zhang, Y.; Lim, J.I.; Chan, R.V.P.; Yang, M.; Yao, X. Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography features for objective classification and staging of diabetic retinopathy. Retina 2020, 40, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. AttaAllah, H.R.; Mohamed, A.A.M.; Ali, M.A. Macular vessels density in diabetic retinopathy: Quantitative assessment using optical coherence tomography angiography. Int. Ophthalmol. 2019, 39, 1845–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ashraf, M.; Nesper, P.L.; Jampol, L.M.; Yu, F.; Fawzi, A.A. Statistical model of optical coherence tomography angiography parameters that correlate with severity of diabetic retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 4292–4298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nesper, P.L.; Roberts, P.K.; Onishi, A.C.; Chai, H.; Liu, L.; Jampol, L.M.; Fawzi, A.A. Quantifying microvascular abnormalities with increasing severity of diabetic retinopathy using OCT angiography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, BIO307–BIO315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Al-Sheikh, M.; Akil, H.; Pfau, M.; Sadda, S.R. Swept-source OCT angiography imaging of the foveal avascular zone and macular capillary network density in diabetic retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 3907–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, K.; Kim, E.S.; Yu, S. Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of foveal microvascular changes and inner retinal layer thinning in patients with diabetes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 102, 1226–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Freiberg, F.J.; Pfau, M.; Wons, J.; Wirth, M.A.; Becker, M.D.; Michels, S. Optical coherence tomography angiography of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2016, 254, 1051–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, Q.; Yasvoina, M.; Olvera-Barrios, A.; Mendes, J.; Zhu, M.; Egan, C.; Tufail, A.; Fruttiger, M. Deciphering the connection between microvascular damage and neurodegeneration in early diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes 2024, 73, 1883–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, T.Y.; Song, Y.Y.; Il-Jung Na, Y.J.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, M.W. The impairment of the deep vascular complex in prolonged type 2 diabetes patients without clinical diabetic retinopathy. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0269182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Iafe, N.A.; Phasukkijwatana, N.; Chen, X.; Sarraf, D. Retinal capillary density and FAZ area are age-dependent. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 5780–5787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, J.; He, Y.; Kong, L.; Yang, D.; Lu, N.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Z. Study of foveal avascular zone growth in individuals with mild diabetic retinopathy by optical coherence tomography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2023, 64, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, Y.; Cui, S.; He, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lu, N.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Z. Early diabetic retinopathy evaluation with OCTA: A study on vascular branching and fragmentation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024, 65, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, T.; Ma, J.; Li, J.; Dai, X.; Ye, P.; Su, Z.; Kong, D.; Ye, J. Multifractal and lacunarity analyses of microvascular morphology in diabetic retinopathy using OCTA. Microcirculation 2019, 26, e12519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Scarinci, F.; Picconi, F.; Giorno, P.; Boccassini, B.; De Geronimo, D.; Varano, M.; Frontoni, S.; Parravano, M. Deep capillary plexus impairment in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus without signs of diabetic retinopathy revealed using OCT angiography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, e264–e265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ashraf, M.; Sampani, K.; Clermont, A.; Abu-Qamar, O.; Rhee, J.; Silva, P.S.; Aiello, L.P.; Sun, J.K. Vascular density of deep, intermediate and superficial vascular plexuses are differentially affected by diabetic retinopathy severity. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Scarinci, F.; Picconi, F.; Virgili, G.; Varano, M.; Giorno, P.; Frontoni, S.; Parravano, M. Microvascular impairment as a biomarker of diabetic retinopathy progression in type 1 diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Spaide, R.F.; Fujimoto, J.G.; Waheed, N.K. Image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 2015, 35, 2163–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Linderman, R.; Salmon, A.E.; Strampe, M.; Russillo, M.; Khan, J.; Carroll, J. Assessing the accuracy of foveal avascular zone measurements using optical coherence tomography angiography. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fernández-Espinosa, G.; Ruiz-Tabuenca, C.; Orduna-Hospital, E.; Pinilla, I.; Salgado-Remacha, F.J. A reliable criterion for the correct delimitation of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic patients. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, J.; Yan, S.; Lu, N.; Yang, D.; Fan, C.; Lv, H.; Wang, S.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Automatic segmentation of foveal avascular zone based on adaptive watershed algorithm in OCTA images. J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 2022, 15, 2242001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Horii, T.; Murakami, T.; Nishijima, K.; Sakamoto, A.; Ota, M.; Yoshimura, N. Optical coherence tomographic characteristics of microaneurysms in diabetic retinopathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2010, 150, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology 1991, 98, 786–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schreur, V.; Domanian, A.; Liefers, B.; Venhuizen, F.G.; Klevering, B.J.; Hoyng, C.B.; de Jong, E.K.; Theelen, T. Morphological and topographical appearance of microaneurysms on optical coherence tomography angiography. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 103, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Clermont, A.C.; Bursell, S.E. Retinal blood flow in diabetes. Microcirculation 2007, 14, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sohn, E.H.; van Dijk, H.W.; Jiao, C.; Kok, P.H.; Jeong, W.; Demirkaya, N.; Garmager, A.; Wit, F.; Kucukevcilioglu, M.; van Velthoven, M.E.J. Retinal neurodegeneration may precede microvascular changes characteristic of diabetic retinopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E2655–E2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Luo, L.J.; Nguyen, D.D.; Lai, J.Y. Chitosan-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) with a benzoic acid derivative: Methoxylation effect and pharmacological treatment of glaucoma-related neurodegeneration. J. Control. Release 2020, 317, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sousa, D.C.; Leal, I.; Moreira, S.; Vale, S.D.; Silva-Herdade, A.R.; Dionísio, P.; Castanho, M.A.R.B.; Pinto, L.A.; Marques-Neves, C. Optical coherence tomography angiography study of retinal vascular plexuses in type 1 diabetes without retinopathy. Eye 2020, 34, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sun, Z.; Tang, F.; Wong, R.; Lok, J.; Szeto, S.K.H.; Chan, J.C.K.; Chan, C.K.; Tham, C.C.; Ng, D.S.; Cheung, C.Y. OCT angiography metrics predict progression of diabetic retinopathy and development of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2019, 126, 1675–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Afarid, M.; Namvar, E.; Sanie-Jahromi, F. Diabetic retinopathy and BDNF: Molecular basis and clinical applications. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 2020, 1602739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gamal El-Deen, A.M.; Abd El-Hamid, S.M.; Farrag, E.A. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor and macular perfusion in type 2 diabetes using OCT angiography. Taiwan J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 14, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Simonett, J.M.; Scarinci, F.; Picconi, F.; Giorno, P.; De Geronimo, D.; Di Renzo, A.; Varano, M.; Frontoni, S.; Parravano, M. Early microvascular retinal changes in OCT angiography in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017, 95, e751–e755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hafner, M.; von Livonius, B.; Deschler, D.; Priglinger, S.G.; Gerhardt, M.J. Quantifying segmentation sensitivity in OCTA: Device-specific profiles across three commercial platforms. PLoS ONE 2026, 21, e0343605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Corvi, F.; Pellegrini, M.; Erba, S.; Cozzi, M.; Staurenghi, G.; Giani, A. Reproducibility of vessel density, fractal dimension, and foveal avascular zone using seven different optical coherence tomography angiography devices. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 186, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mihailovic, N.; Brand, C.; Lahme, L.; Schubert, F.; Bormann, E.; Eter, N.; Alnawaiseh, M. Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement of foveal avascular zone measurements using three different optical coherence tomography angiography devices. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Shiihara, H.; Sakamoto, T.; Yamashita, T.; Kakiuchi, N.; Otsuka, H.; Terasaki, H.; Sonoda, S. Reproducibility and differences in area of foveal avascular zone measured by three different optical coherence tomographic angiography instruments. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Study selection process flow-chart.
Figure 1. Study selection process flow-chart.
Life 16 00496 g001
Table 1. Key OCTA-derived biomarkers associated with preclinical diabetic retinopathy and their clinical significance.
Table 1. Key OCTA-derived biomarkers associated with preclinical diabetic retinopathy and their clinical significance.
CategoryOCTA BiomarkerRetinal Layer/AreaReported Change in Preclinical DRClinical Significance Key References
Density-Based MetricsVessel density (VD)SCPDecreased or
unchanged
Early perfusion abnormalities [5,6,7,9,15]
Vessel density (VD)DCPDecreasedOne of the most consistent early markers of retinal microvascular impairment[4,9,15,27,28]
Perfusion density (PD)SCP/DCPDecreasedReduced retinal perfusion indicating early microvascular dysfunction[15,27,28,29]
Perfused capillary density (PCD)SCP/DCPDecreasedSensitive indicator of capillary dropout and early ischemia[9,15,28,29,30]
FAZ-Related ParametersFAZ areaSCP/DCPIncreased or unchangedEarly ischemic alteration with considerable interstudy variability[6,7,8,15,17,26,28,31,32]
FAZ circularity/acircularity indexSCP/DCPDecreased circularity/increased acircularity Marker of early FAZ remodeling[33,34,35]
Peri-FAZ vessel densitySCP/DCPDecreasedMay precede overt enlargement of the FAZ[23,27]
Ischemia and Flow ImpairmentCapillary non-perfusion areaSCP/DCPIncreasedIndicator of retinal ischemia and microvascular damage[27,36,37]
Choriocapillaris flow deficitCCIncreasedPossible indicator of early choroidal microvascular involvement[15,21,22]
Microaneurysm detectionSCP/DCPIncreasedMarker of early vascular pathology and disease activity[34,38]
Vascular Geometry and Network ComplexityChoriocapillaris flow deficit (FD%)CCIncreasedPossible indicator of early choroidal microvascular involvement[15,21,22,32]
Fractal dimension (FD)SCP/DCPDecreasedReduced complexity of the vascular network[29,30,39]
LacunaritySCP/DCPIncreased network heterogeneityIndicator of microcirculatory instability[39]
VD—Vessel Density, PD—Perfusion Density, PCD—Perfused Capillary Density, FAZ—Foveal Avascular Zone, SCP—Superficial Capillary Plexus, DCP—Deep Capillary Plexus, and CC—Choriocapillaris.
Table 2. OCTA studies on patients with diabetes without clinical diabetic retinopathy.
Table 2. OCTA studies on patients with diabetes without clinical diabetic retinopathy.
Study/YearDiabetes TypePopulationN (DM)Control Group (n)OCTA ParametersMost Affected LayerMain Findings
Dimitrova et al., 2017 [17]T2DMAdults2933VD, FAZSCP, DCP↑ FAZ
↓ VD
Carnevali et al., 2017 [10]T1DMAdults2525VD, CCDCP↓ VD in DCP
Simonett et al., 2017 [57]T1DMAdults2823VD, FAZDCP↓ VD in DCP
Vujosevic et al., 2019 [16]T1DM/T2DMAdults6030VD, GCLSCP, DCP↑ FAZ
↓ GCL thickness
Cao et al., 2018 [4]T2DMAdults7167VD, FAZSCP, DCP, CC↓ VD in SCP/DCP
Sousa et al., 2020 [53] T1DMAdults2424VD, FAZSCP, DCP↓ VD in SCP/DCP
Yang et al., 2020 [9]T1DM/T2DMAdults9292VD, FAZ SCP, DCP↓ VD in SCP
Sacconi et al., 2024 [22]T1DMAdults2121VD, VLDDCP↑ VD in DCP
Niestrata-Ortiz et al., 2019 [7]T1DMChildren11230FAZDCP↑ FAZ
Gołębiewska et al., 2017 [6]T1DMChildren9436FD, FAZSCP, DCPNo difference
Koca et al., 2022 [20] T1DMChildren4646VDSCP, DCP↓ VD in SCP/DCP
VD—Vessel Density, FAZ—Foveal Avascular Zone, SCP—Superficial Capillary Plexus, DCP—Deep Capillary Plexus, CC—Choriocapillaris, T1DM—Type 1 diabetes mellitus, and T2DM—Type 2 diabetes mellitus, ↑ increase, ↓ decrease.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Strauss, I.; Gawęcki, M. Biomarkers of Preclinical Diabetic Retinopathy Detected by OCT Angiography—A Descriptive Review. Life 2026, 16, 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16030496

AMA Style

Strauss I, Gawęcki M. Biomarkers of Preclinical Diabetic Retinopathy Detected by OCT Angiography—A Descriptive Review. Life. 2026; 16(3):496. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16030496

Chicago/Turabian Style

Strauss, Ilona, and Maciej Gawęcki. 2026. "Biomarkers of Preclinical Diabetic Retinopathy Detected by OCT Angiography—A Descriptive Review" Life 16, no. 3: 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16030496

APA Style

Strauss, I., & Gawęcki, M. (2026). Biomarkers of Preclinical Diabetic Retinopathy Detected by OCT Angiography—A Descriptive Review. Life, 16(3), 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16030496

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop