Next Article in Journal
Effects of Irrigation Water Amount and Humic Acid on β-Glucan Synthesis in Post-Anthesis Grains of Naked Oats
Previous Article in Journal
Association of Sheep Tail Type with the T Gene Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Loci
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigations on Beekeeping and Breeding of Apis cerana in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation and Study on the Biology and Morphology of Apis florea and Apis dorsata in Southern China

1
State Key Laboratory of Resource Insects, Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
2
College of Bioscience and Resource Environment, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
3
Beekeeping Guidance Station, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530012, China
4
Beekeeping Guidance Station, Ningming County, Chongzuo 530025, China
5
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2025, 15(3), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030341
Submission received: 21 January 2025 / Revised: 13 February 2025 / Accepted: 20 February 2025 / Published: 21 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Honeybees: Second Edition)

Abstract

:
Honey bees are crucial pollinators that play a vital role in maintaining ecological balance. The colonies of managed honey bees in China increased rapidly in the past 20 years. Whether the rapid increase in managed bee populations would affect the survival of wild honey bees deserves attention. There are four species of the genus Apis in Guangxi, China, including Apis florea, Apis dorsata, Apis mellifera ligustica, and Apis cerana. This study conducted an investigation on the biological characteristics of the four species and measured 40 morphological characteristics. The results showed that for the four species, their swarming periods, mating periods, the emergence of drones, and the nectar and pollen source plants highly overlap. This leads to potential competition for the optimum mating space, nectar, and pollen. The comparison of morphological traits between samples collected in 2012 and 2023 showed that the aspect ratios of the forewings of both Apis florea and Apis dorsata have significantly increased. This change may be attributed to the rapid increase in managed honey bees’ populations, which has encroached upon the living spaces of A. florea and A. dorsata. The results of coefficient of variations showed that Apis florea and Apis dorsata exhibit high genetic diversity. Our results indicated that the increased colonies’ number of managed honey bees has an effect on Apis florea and Apis dorsata, but they are not facing great threats to their survival. Continuous monitoring of the the diversity of Apis florea and Apis dorsata must be maintained. Preserving wild honey bees is of great significance for the ecological balance.

1. Introduction

Honey bees are important pollinators in nature and are indispensable for the ecological balance [1,2,3]. Pollination by honey bees improves the production and quality of crops [4,5,6]. Also, bee products, including honey, royal jelly, and pollen, are good for human health [7,8,9,10]. It is precisely because of the importance of honey bees that the colonies of commercial honey bees in China have increased rapidly over the past 20 years [11]. However, whether the rapid increase in commercial honey bees populations in China would affect the survival of wild honey bees deserves attention.
Previous studies reported that commercial honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies may compete with native bees for flower resources [12,13,14,15,16]. Although commercial honeybees are generally not known to exhibit aggression towards other bees, numerous reports suggest that they deplete the pollen and nectar resources of native plants, leading to a negative correlation between the presence of commercial honeybees and native bees, particularly in areas with high concentrations of commercial bee colonies [16,17]. MacInnis et al. (2023) found substantial evidence for a decrease in wild bee richness following a massive (>12×) increase in honey bee colony density over <10 years [18]. Since honey bees may outcompete and threaten native flower-visiting insects, some countries have made rules to restrict the number and density of commercial honey bee colonies [19,20]. There is strong evidence showing that honey bees compete with native insects in European cities and in areas with high densities of commercial honey bee colonies [21,22].
Located in southern China, Guangxi borders the Beibu Gulf in the south and is crossed by the Tropic of Cancer in its central region. Guangxi boasts a warm climate, abundant sunshine, plentiful rainfall, and rich nectariferous plants, which provide an ideal habitat for honey bees. Four species of the genus Apis can be found in Guangxi, including Apis florea (A. florea), Apis dorsata (A. dorsata), Apis mellifera ligustica (A. m. ligustica), and Apis cerana (A. cerana). Among them, A. florea and A. dorsata are wild honey bees, while A. m. ligustica and A. cerana are managed honey bees. In the past 20 years, the beekeeping industry in Guangxi has undergone a rapid development, marked by a steady increase in breeding populations of A. m. ligustica and A. cerana. In 1999, the number of colonies kept in Guangxi was 277,200, including 33,300 colonies of A. m. ligustica and 243,900 colonies of A. ceana [23]. In 2014, the number of colonies was 732,000, including 172,500 colonies of A. m. ligustica and 559,500 colonies of A. cerana [23]. In 2020, the number of colonies was 921,200, including 231,200 colonies of A. m. ligustica and 690,000 colonies of A. cerana [23]. Over the past 20 years, the number of colonies of A. m. ligustica and A. cerana kept in Guangxi has increased by 232%. According to surveys on apiculture in Guangxi, both A. m. ligustica and A. cerana are distributed throughout the whole region, overlapping with the distribution areas of A. florea and A. dorsata. However, whether the rapid increase in managed honey bee populations will affect the survival of wild A. florea and A. dorsata is still unclear.
Therefore, this study conducted an investigation on the biological characteristics of A. florea, A. dorsata, A. m. ligustica, and A. cerana in Guangxi to find the similarities of biological characteristics for the four species. Morphological characteristics were measured for the four species to find the differences among them. Further, we compared the morphological characteristics of A. florea and A. dorsata between 2012 and 2023 to analyze whether their morphological features have changed over the past ten years. Based on a comprehensive analysis of these indicators, the study assessed whether the survival of A. florea and A. dorsata has been impacted by the rapid increase in populations of managed A. m. ligustica and A. cerana over the past 20 years.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Survey and Data Acquisition

We designed a questionnaire to obtain basic biological information about A. florea, A. dorsata, and A. m. ligustica in Guangxi (Figure 1). The biological information of A. cerana was from our previous study [24]. Paper copies of the questionnaire were distributed to local beekeeping organizations, which delegated surveyors to randomly select and communicate with beekeepers face-to-face in daily visits. All the completed questionnaires were then returned to our center for data reduction and analysis. Samples of A. florea and A. dorsata were collected from regions with the highest distribution densities for morphological measurements.

2.2. Description of the Area of Study

Guangxi is located in the subtropical monsoon climate zone, with the northern half having a central subtropical climate and the southern half having a southern subtropical climate. Guangxi has a mountainous and hilly basin topography.
In 2021, the average temperature in Guangxi was 21.6 °C, ranging from 17.1 °C to 24.4 °C. In the regions where A. dorsata and A. florea have been discovered, the extreme highest and lowest temperature over the years is 41.2 °C and −5.2 °C, respectively. In 2021, the average annual precipitation in Guangxi was 1335.3 mm, ranging from 750.7 mm to 2184.5 mm. In 2021, the average annual sunshine hours in Guangxi were 1675.1 h, ranging from 1155.5 h to 2319.6 h. The frost-free period is 327 to 353.7 d.
The distribution area of A. dorsata is located between 21°35′ N–24°59′ N and 104°29′ E–110°47′ E in Guangxi. The distribution area of A. florea is located between 21°35′ N–25°33′ N, and 104°29′ E–110°53′ E. A. cerana and A. m. ligustica are kept using modern beekeeping methods in Guangxi.
Previous surveys and research found that there were 735 species of plants in Guangxi pollinated by honey bees [23]. These plants include Tetradium ruticarpum (A. Juss.) T. G. Hartley, Dimocarpus longan Lour., Litchi chinensis Sonn., Heptapleurum heptaphyllum (L.) Y. F. Deng, and Toxicodendron vernicifluum (Stokes) F. A. Barkley. These nectar and pollen plants bloom continuously throughout the year, providing sufficient nectar and pollen for the survival and development of honey bees (Figure 2) [23].

2.3. Sampling and Morphometric Measurements

In 2023, samples of A. florea workers were collected from 10 colonies in 3 locations (Wuhehuaqiao Forest Farm (3 colonies), Jiangzhou Town (5 colonies), and Liangtang Town (2 colonies)) (Figure 3). Samples of A. dorsata workers were collected from 10 colonies in 2 locations (Wuxiangling Forest Park (6 colonies) and Dongpo Village (6 colonies)) (Figure 3). Samples of A. cerana and A. m. ligustica workers were collected from 20 colonies from 2 breeding apiaries (10 colonies for each species). We randomly selected a basket of bees from the hives, preferably from the brood area (which we visually observed to have a strong, fluffy appearance) and a uniform color on the comb. For each colony, around 50 worker bees were collected. We then placed them into a sealed bag and closed it until the bees calmed down or were exposed to the sun for a while. When most of the bees were dead, we transferred them into a 50 mL centrifuge tube and preserved them in 75% ethanol. The collected samples and the morphometric data derived from them are stored at the Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
To know the changes of morphometric characteristics of A. dorsata and A. florea from 2010s to 2020s in Guangxi, morphometric characteristics were measured for samples collected in 2023 and re-measured for samples collected by Lianfei Cao in the same location in 2012 [25]. Morphometric measurements of 40 characteristics were taken from 10 honey bees from each colony, according to the method described by Ruttner and Meixner [26,27]. Measurements of hair were taken under a ZEICS dissecting microscope (Stemi 508) fitted with an eyepiece graticle at a magnification of 32×. Measurements of wings, legs, and sternites were taken with a LEICA DMS 300, which is a Leica microscope with a CCD camera connected to a desktop computer.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation in each of the 40 morphometric characteristics were calculated for every colony. The data were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare results from different species and from different years. Tukey’s HSD tests were used to detect significant differences between the species on the means of the 40 characteristics. The Bonferroni method was used for multiple comparisons to correct the p-value. Prior to analysis, the data were assessed for linearity, normal distribution, and the presence of outliers. To analyze the diversity of the four bee populations, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for each bee population using Excel 2007. CV = (standard deviation/average value) × 100%.

3. Results

3.1. Biological Characteristics

In total, 108 counties (regions) in Guangxi participated in the survey and 412 respondents provided feedback. According to the survey, the migration period of A. florea in Guangxi occurs in February and August each year (Figure 4). The emergence of drones, mating time, and swarming period all coincide and are concentrated in March and April (Figure 5). The queen in A. florea colonies lays eggs continuously throughout the year without any cessation. In Guangxi, the main honey-harvesting period for A. florea is from January to May, with each colony yielding 1–1.5 kg of honey per harvest. No diseases have been observed to date.
The migration of A. dorsata in Guangxi occurs annually from February to October (Figure 4). The emergence of drones, mating time, and swarming period all coincide and are mainly concentrated in March and April, similar to that of A. florea (Figure 5). Due to the hot weather, the queen of A. dorsata stops laying eggs in July and resumes egg-laying in August as the temperature drops. The main honey-harvesting period for A. dorsata is from January to May, with each colony yielding 10–25 kg of honey per harvest. No diseases have been observed to date.
In Guangxi, the emergence of drones and swarming in A. m. ligustica colonies mainly occur from March to May and from October to November (Figure 5). The queen stops laying eggs from June to August and from November to January of the following year. The main honey-harvesting period is concentrated between March and October each year. In Guangxi, the annual honey production per colony for migratory beekeeping is approximately 60 kg. No occurrences of Sacbrood virus or European foulbrood have been observed.
In Guangxi, A. cerana has two main swarming periods, one from March to April and the other from September to November. During these times, drone larvae are formed (Figure 5). This ensures the availability of sufficient mature drones for mating with virgin queens. The queen mainly stops laying eggs in January and from July to August. The main honey-harvesting periods for colonies throughout the year are from May to July, August to September, and November to December, with an annual honey production of approximately 10 to 25 kg per colony.
According to survey results, the nectar and pollen source plants collected by the four species of honey bees in Guangxi are almost the same, mainly including Litchi chinensis Sonn., Dimocarpus longan Lour., Triadica cochinchinensis Loureiro, and Heptapleurum heptaphyllum (L.) Y. F. Deng. Competition for the nectar and pollen exists among these four species of honey bee [12,13,14,15,16].

3.2. Overall Description of the Morphology of A. florea and A. dorsata

The queen of A. florea measures 16.5 mm in length (Figure 6), with a forewing length of 9.75 mm. The tergites of the first and second abdominal segments, the basal half of the third tergite, and the apical margins of the third to fifth tergites are all reddish-brown, while the rest are black. The worker of A. florea measures 7 to 8 mm in length, with the tergites of the first and second abdominal segments being reddish-brown. The head is slightly wider than the thorax, and the apex of the mandibles is reddish-brown. The distance between the two posterior ocelli is greater than the distance from the posterior ocelli to the compound eyes. The length of the malar space is significantly smaller than its width. The scutellum and the tergites of the third to sixth abdominal segments are all black. The body hairs are short and sparse; the face and the lower surface of the head are covered with grayish-white hairs, while the hairs on the vertex are dark brown. The thorax is adorned with grayish-yellow short hairs, and the abdominal tergites are covered with dark brown short hairs. There are white fluffy bands at the bases of the third to fifth tergites. The ventral surface of the abdomen is adorned with fine and long grayish-white hairs. The dorsal sides of both the hind tibia and basitarsus are covered with white hairs on both sides. The drone measures 11 to 13 mm in length and is black in color. It differs from the worker in that the medial lobelike protrusion on the hind tibia is long, slightly exceeding two-thirds of the total length of the tibia.
The queen of A. dorsata has a body length of 23 mm (Figure 6), forewing length of 14.5 mm, and is entirely black in color. The drone measures 16 to 17 mm in length. Its compound eyes are large, with the posterior inner edges of the two eyes closely connected. The abdomen is cylindrical and black, with the metapleuron, most of the tergites from the first to the sixth abdominal segments, and the middle and hind legs being reddish-brown. The forelegs are dark brown, and the ratio of the length of the hind tibia to the length of the basitarsus is 5:3. The body hair ranges from light yellow to yellow, with the compound eyes densely covered with short yellow hairs and the clypeus covered with black hairs. The area around the ocelli, cheeks, outer sides of the foreleg coxae, chest, and the first and second abdominal tergites are covered with long yellow hairs. The upper and lower lips of the workers of A. dorsata are chestnut-brown, while the first segment of the antennae and the mouthparts are tawny. The hairs on the head are sparse and short, grayish-white in color. The vertex, mesoscutum, and mesopleuron are covered with dense and long dark brown to black hairs. The scutellum and propodeum are adorned with honey-yellow long hairs. The first to third tergites of the abdomen are covered with honey-yellow short hairs, while the remaining segments are adorned with brown to dark brown short hairs. The legs are covered with black hairs. The outer sides of each segment of the forelegs have long yellow hairs, and the inner sides of the basitarsi of the middle and hind legs are adorned with golden-brown hairs. The wings are dark brown with a purple gloss, with the anterior and subanterior cells being the darkest in color, and the hind wings being slightly lighter in shade.

3.3. Morphological Changes in A. florea and A. dorsata over the Past Decade

To understand the changes of morphometric characteristics of A. dorsata and A. florea from 2010s to 2020s, morphometric characteristics were compared between samples collected in 2012 and 2023 (Figure 7, Tables S1 and S2). The results showed that over the past decade, the forewing length of A. florea has significantly increased by 1.34%, while the forewing width has significantly decreased by 2.30%, resulting in a significant increase in the forewing length-to-width ratio by 3.80%. The wing angles J10, J16, K19, and N23 have significantly decreased by 5.57%, 2.48%, 3.44%, and 7.85%, respectively. For A. dorsata, the forewing length has significantly increased by 2.61%, while the forewing width has significantly decreased by 2.28%, leading to a significant increase in the forewing length-to-width ratio of 4.88%. The wing angles D7 and N23 have significantly increased, while L13 and O26 have significantly decreased. The length of the third sternite, the wax mirror of sternite 3 longitudinal, and the wax mirror of sternite 3 transversal have significantly increased by 3.90%, 12.51%, and 4.54%, respectively. The length of the sixth sternite and the width of the sixth sternite have also significantly increased by 4.34% and 4.82%, respectively. These results indicate that significant morphological changes have occurred in A. florea and A. dorsata over the past decade.

3.4. Morphological Comparison of Four Species of Honey Bees in Guangxi

When ranked by body size, the four species of honey bee follow the order A. dorsata > A. m. ligustica > A. cerana > A. florea. However, some morphological characteristics do not follow this size variation pattern (Table S1). For example, the hair length of A. florea and A. dorsata are almost the same. A. m. ligustica has the longest hair, measuring 0.23 mm, while A. cerana has the shortest hair. The width of stripe posterior of tomentum of A. dorsata is the smallest (0.12 mm). The width of stripe posterior of tomentum of A. cerana is 0.78 mm, which is the largest among the four honey bee species.

4. Variation Analysis of Morphometric Characteristics

By calculating and analyzing the coefficient of variation (CV), it was found that among the characteristics related to hair length (Figure 8a), the average CV for A. florea was 18.92%, while for A. dorsata it was 93.02%. The average CV for A. m. ligustica was 23.40%, and for A. cerana it was 19.58%. For the characteristics related to the legs (Figure 8b), the average CV for A. florea was 3.68%, while for A. dorsata it was 5.5%. For A. m. ligustica, it was 3.72% and for A. cerana it was 4.71%. Regarding the characteristics related to wings (Figure 8c), the average CV for A. florea was 13.60%, for A. dorsata it was 10.31%, for A. m. ligustica it was 7.43%, and for A. cerana it was 7.07%. For the characteristics related to body size (Figure 8d), the average CV for A. florea was 7.91%, for A. dorsata it was 9.07%, for A. m. ligustica it was 7.54%, and for A. cerana it was 6.52%.
Among the characteristics related to hair length, the CV for all four species are relatively large, with A. dorsata exhibiting the highest average CV, indicating a high degree of variation. For the characteristics related to wings, both A. florea and A. dorsata have average CVs exceeding 10%, suggesting a significant level of variation. In contrast, the CVs for the characteristics related to legs and body size are relatively small for all four species, indicating stable genetic inheritance. Therefore, A. florea and A. dorsata possess higher genetic diversity compared to A. m. ligustica and A. cerana.

5. Discussion

Honey bees are important pollinators and play a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance [28,29,30]. Honey bees in China are widely distributed across various geographical and climatic regions [31,32,33]. Through the process of long-term natural selection, each bee species has developed strong adaptability to local ecological conditions. Guangxi, with various honey bee resources, is located in southern China. Nectar and pollen plants are abundant. Plants bloom continuously throughout the year. This provides a natural environment conducive to honey bee survival. Over the past 20 years, the number of colonies of A. m. ligustica and A. cerana in Guangxi has increased by 230%. Previous studies reported that honey bees compete with native insects, which was particularly strong in European cities and in areas with high densities of commercial hives [18,21,22]. MacInnis et al. (2023) found that honey bee abundance had the strongest negative effect on small (inter-tegular span < 2.25 mm) wild bee species richness [18]. Small bee species may be at higher risk in areas with abundant honey bee populations as their limited foraging range may reduce their access to floral resources in times of increased competition [18]. In Guangxi, A. florea and A. dorsata have apparently coexisted with A. cerana for decades or even centuries, suggesting that coexistence can be sustained. However, the rapid growth of commercial honey bee colonies has only emerged in the past 20 years. It remains unclear whether this large and rapid increase of managed colonies will affect the survival of wild honey bees (A. florea and A. dorsata). Therefore, in this study, we studied the biological characteristics of A. florea, A. dorsata, A. m. ligustica, and A. cerana to analyze the possible competition among them. We also compared the morphometric characteristics of A. florea and A. dorsata between samples collected in 2012 and 2023 to determine whether their morphometric characteristics were affected by this competition.
Based on the survey results, for all four species, their swarming periods, mating periods, and the emergence of drones highly overlap in spring, with A. florea and A. dorsata initiating hive activities slightly earlier. Spring is the breeding season for A. m. ligustica and A. cerana [34], and beekeepers conduct activities such as swarming, queen rearing, and mating during this time. Managed honey bees may occupy an area, forming a drone congregation zone where the altitude, the sunlight, and the airflow are highly favorable for mating. Due to their smaller size, A. florea might be at a disadvantage when competing for mating space. It is speculated that the mating success rate of A. florea may decline as a result of this competition. However, A. dorsata are larger in size, and it remains unclear whether their mating success rate would be affected by the competition for mating space [35]. In autumn, there is another peak in reproduction for A. cerana and A. m. ligustica, while this does not take place for A. florea and A. dorsata. This difference may be attributed to beekeepers’ interventions to quickly restore and strengthen the colonies after the hot summer, preparing for the subsequent honey collection. Therefore, during autumn and winter, A. cerana and A. m. ligustica still maintain strong colony size. This ensures that they maintain a dominant position in foraging during autumn and winter. Based on the survey results, for all four species, the nectar and pollen source plants highly overlap. Inevitably, A. cerana and A. m. ligutica compete for food resources with A. florea and A. dorsata, potentially leading to food shortages for the latter two species and hindering the development of wild bee populations. In 2023, the study by MacInnis et al. provided evidence to support that honey bee abundance negatively affects wild bee diversity through exploitative competition for urban floral resources [18]. Our studies also suggest that a high density of commercial bee colonies have an impact on the mating and foraging activities of wild bees.
Through a comparison of the morphologies of A. florea and A. dorsata between 2012 and 2023, it has been observed that the aspect ratios of the forewings of both A. florea and A. dorsata have significantly increased. Changes in the aspect ratio would affect the flight capabilities. The larger aspect ratio indicates more flattened wings. It helps insects to maintain stability during high-speed flight, to reduce air resistance, and enhances flight efficiency [36,37,38]. This change in aspect ratio may be attributed to the rapid increase in managed honey bee populations, which has encroached upon the living spaces of A. florea and A. dorsata. In response to this threat, A. florea and A. dorsata must rely on faster flight speeds to occupy mating spaces, to implement foraging activities, and to maintain their survival. Additionally, the wax-mirror area of the abdomen of A. dorsata has expanded. A larger wax-mirror area enhances their ability to secrete wax and construct combs [39], enabling them to repair their nests more quickly after migration and better adapt to environmental changes.
The comparison of morphological characteristics revealed that the hair length of both A. florea and the A. dorsata was significantly longer than that of the A. cerana, with A. cerana having the shortest hair length. The hair on the surface of bees’ body helps it regulating body temperature [40,41]. Honey bees with shorter body hair may exhibit better heat tolerance compared to those with longer hair. Guangxi is a region with relatively high temperatures throughout the year. Although A. florea, A. dorsata, and A. cerana are all native bees in Guangxi, A. cerana are managed honey bees. Due to the artificial selection for better heat tolerance, the hair length of A. cerana in the region has become shorter. In contrast, A. florea and A. dorsata are wild honey bees, without selection pressure on hair length. This explains why the hair length of A. cerana is shorter than A. florea, though A. cerana has a larger body size.
Through the analysis of the coefficient of variation, it was found that A. florea and A. dorsata exhibit higher genetic diversity compared to A. m. ligustica and A. cerana. A. florea and A. dorsata are wild honey bees that need to better adapt to environmental changes for the reproduction and development of their populations. Therefore, they retain higher genetic diversity. In contrast, A. m. ligustica and A. cerana are managed honey bees, and the artificial selection aimed at higher productivity has led to a decline in their genetic diversity.
In the process of agricultural and industrial modernization in China, wild honey bees have suffered a series of adverse effects on their survival. Our results showed that the large and rapid increase in managed honey bees in the Guangxi region has affected the nesting, mating, foraging, and pollination activities of A. florea and A. dorsata. The morphometric analysis showed that the aspect ratios of the forewings of both A. florea and A. dorsata have significantly increased in the past ten years, which has helped them to adapt to the competition brought by A. m. ligustica and A. cerana. The diversity results showed that A. florea and A. dorsata are not currently facing threats to their survival. However, we need to continuously monitor the diversity of A. florea and A. dorsata. Preserving wild honey bees is of great significance for ecological balance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life15030341/s1, Table S1: The mean and standard deviation of morphological indicators for A. florea, A. dorsata, A. m. ligustica and A. cerana collected in 2023; Table S2: The mean and standard deviations of morphological indicators for A. florea and A. dorsata collected in 2012.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.C.; methodology, X.C.; software, X.C.; validation, X.C. and X.Q.; formal analysis, X.C. and X.Q.; investigation, H.Q., Z.B., J.H., T.S., Z.Q., Q.L., P.T. and L.C.; resources, X.C.; data curation, X.C. and X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.C. and X.Q.; writing—review and editing, X.C. and X.Q.; visualization, X.Q.; supervision, X.C.; project administration, X.C.; funding acquisition, X.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation, grant number 6222058.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the beekeepers that participated in the survey in Guangxi for their help in field work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gallai, N.; Salles, J.M.; Settele, J.; Vaissière, B.E. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 810–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van der Sluijs, J.P.; Simon-Delso, N.; Goulson, D.; Maxim, L.; Bonmatin, J.-M.; Belzunces, L.P. Neonicotinoids, bee disorders and the sustainability of pollinator services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stanley, J.; Sah, K.; Subbanna, A.R.; Preetha, G.; Gupta, J. How efficient is Apis cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in pollinating cabbage, Brassica oleracea var. capitata? Pollination behavior, pollinator effectiveness, pollinator requirement, and impact of pollination. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ollerton, J.; Winfree, R.; Tarrant, S. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 2011, 120, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khalifa, S.A.; Elshafiey, E.H.; Shetaia, A.A.; El-Wahed, A.A.A.; Algethami, A.F.; Musharraf, S.G.; AlAjmi, M.F.; Zhao, C.; Masry, S.H.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. Overview of bee pollination and its economic value for crop production. Insects 2021, 12, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sáez, A.; Negri, P.; Viel, M.; Aizen, M.A. Pollination efficiency of artificial and bee pollination practices in kiwifruit. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 246, 1017–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kafantaris, I.; Amoutzias, G.D.; Mossialos, D. Foodomics in bee product research: A systematic literature review. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021, 247, 309–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Viuda-Martos, M.; Ruiz-Navajas, Y.; Fernández-López, J.; Pérez-Álvarez, J. Functional properties of honey, propolis, and royal jelly. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, R117–R124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khalifa, S.A.; Elashal, M.H.; Yosri, N.; Du, M.; Musharraf, S.G.; Nahar, L.; Sarker, S.D.; Guo, Z.; Cao, W.; Zou, X. Bee pollen: Current status and therapeutic potential. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yan, C.-Y.; Zhu, Q.-Q.; Guan, C.-X.; Xiong, G.-L.; Chen, X.-X.; Gong, H.-B.; Li, J.-W.; Ouyang, S.-H.; Kurihara, H.; Li, Y.-F. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Hydrolyzed Royal Jelly Peptide in Human Dermal Fibroblasts: Implications for Skin Health and Care Applications. Bioengineering 2024, 11, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Diao, Q.; Yang, D.; Zhao, H.; Deng, S.; Wang, X.; Hou, C.; Wilfert, L. Prevalence and population genetics of the emerging honey bee pathogen DWV in Chinese apiculture. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Goulson, D.; Nicholls, E.; Botías, C.; Rotheray, E.L. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 2015, 347, 1255957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kennedy, C.M.; Lonsdorf, E.; Neel, M.C.; Williams, N.M.; Ricketts, T.H.; Winfree, R.; Bommarco, R.; Brittain, C.; Burley, A.L.; Cariveau, D. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 584–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Koh, I.; Lonsdorf, E.V.; Williams, N.M.; Brittain, C.; Isaacs, R.; Gibbs, J.; Ricketts, T.H. Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Settele, J.; Bishop, J.; Potts, S.G. Climate change impacts on pollination. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Quinlan, G.M.; Doser, J.W.; Kammerer, M.A.; Grozinger, C.M. Estimating genus-specific effects of non-native honey bees and urbanization on wild bee communities: A case study in Maryland, United States. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 953, 175783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iwasaki, J.M.; Hogendoorn, K. Mounting evidence that managed and introduced bees have negative impacts on wild bees: An updated review. Curr. Res. Insect Sci. 2022, 2, 100043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. MacInnis, G.; Normandin, E.; Ziter, C.D. Decline in wild bee species richness associated with honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) abundance in an urban ecosystem. PeerJ 2023, 11, e14699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Matsuzawa, T.; Kohsaka, R. Status and trends of urban beekeeping regulations: A global review. Earth 2021, 2, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sørensen, P.B.; Strandberg, B.; Bruus, M.; Kjær, C.; Larsen, S.; Hansen, R.R.; Damgaard, C.F.; Strandberg, M. Modelling risk of competitive effects from honeybees on wild bees. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 118, 106749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Casanelles-Abella, J.; Moretti, M. Challenging the sustainability of urban beekeeping using evidence from Swiss cities. NPJ Urban Sustain. 2022, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Casanelles-Abella, J.; Fontana, S.; Fournier, B.; Frey, D.; Moretti, M. Low resource availability drives feeding niche partitioning between wild bees and honeybees in a European city. Ecol. Appl. 2023, 33, e2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qin, H.R.; Bi, Z.H. SWOT Analysis and Development Countermeasures of Chinese Honey Bee Industry in Guangxi. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2022, 50, 227–231. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. Qu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, G.; Qin, H.; Zhang, H.; Tian, H.; Chen, X. Investigations on Beekeeping and Breeding of Apis cerana in China. Life 2024, 15, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cao, L.F. Phylogenetic Analysis of Honeybees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apis) and Genetic Differentiation of Chinese Apis dorsata Fabricius. Ph.D. Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Friedrich, R. Morphometric Analysis and Classification. In Biogeography and Taxonomy of Honeybees; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 66–78. [Google Scholar]
  27. Meixner, M.D.; Pinto, M.A.; Bouga, M.; Kryger, P.; Ivanova, E.; Fuchs, S. Standard methods for characterising subspecies and ecotypes of Apis mellifera. J. Apic. Res. 2013, 52, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Requier, F.; Pérez-Méndez, N.; Andersson, G.K.S.; Blareau, E.; Merle, I.; Garibaldi, L.A. Bee and non-bee pollinator importance for local food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2023, 38, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Willmer, P.G.; Cunnold, H.; Ballantyne, G. Insights from measuring pollen deposition: Quantifying the pre-eminence of bees as flower visitors and effective pollinators. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2017, 11, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Allsopp, M.H.; De Lange, W.J.; Veldtman, R. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Peng, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, Z. A descriptive study of the prevalence of parasites and pathogens in Chinese black honeybees. Parasitology 2015, 142, 1364–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, S.; Zhu, X.; Xu, X.; Gao, J.; Zhou, B. Multivariate morphometric analysis of local and introduced populations of Apis cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae) on Hainan Island, China. J. Apic. Res. 2018, 57, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.; Zeng, B.; Deng, M.; Zhao, T.; Liao, Y.; Ren, R.; Wang, H.; Yuan, Y. Whole-genome resequencing reveals genetic diversity and adaptive evolution in Chinese honeybee (Apis cerana cerana) in Guizhou, China. Front. Genet. 2024, 15, 1352455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dhaliwal, N.K.; Singh, J.; Chhuneja, P.K. Comparative evaluation of Doolittle, Cupkit and Karl Jenter techniques for rearing Apis mellifera Linnaeus queen bees during breeding season. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2017, 9, 1658–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Koeniger, N.; Koeniger, G. Reproductive isolation among species of the genus Apis. Apidologie 2000, 31, 313–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ellington, C.P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. I. The quasi-steady analysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1984, 305, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ferrari, A.; Tommasi, N.; Polidori, C. Urbanisation reduced body size but potentially improved flight performance in bees and wasps. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2024, 74, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Evans, S.W. The wing morphology traits of resident birds that spend a large amount of time per day flying are similar to those of migrant birds. J. Ornithol. 2021, 162, 765–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Noll, F.; Justino, C.; Almeida, E.; Mateus, S.; Billen, J. Would wax glands help us to understand the relationships among corbiculate bees? Insectes Sociaux 2021, 68, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ken, T.; Fuchs, S.; Koeniger, N.; Ruiguang, Z. Morphological characterization of Apis cerana in the Yunnan Province of China. Apidologie 2003, 34, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Montero-Mendieta, S.; Tan, K.; Christmas, M.J.; Olsson, A.; Vilà, C.; Wallberg, A.; Webster, M.T. The genomic basis of adaptation to high-altitude habitats in the eastern honey bee (Apis cerana). Mol. Ecol. 2019, 28, 746–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Survey questionnaire for four species of honey bee in the Guangxi region.
Figure 1. Survey questionnaire for four species of honey bee in the Guangxi region.
Life 15 00341 g001
Figure 2. The ecological environments and nectar plants in Guangxi. (a,b) The ecological environment where the A. florea lives. (c) Tetradium ruticarpum (A. Juss.) T. G. Hartley and A. florea. (d) Cyanthillium patulum (Aiton) H. Rob. and A. florea. (e,f) The ecological environment where the A. dorsata lives. (g) Pericallis hybrida B. Nord. and A. dorsata. (h) Tetradium ruticarpum (A. Juss.) T. G. Hartley and A. dorsata. (i,j) The ecological environment where the A. m. ligustica lives. (k) Litchi chinensis Sonn. and A. m. ligustica. (l) Dimocarpus longan Lour. and A. m. ligustica. (m,n) The ecological environment where the A. cerana lives. (o) Heptapleurum heptaphyllum (L.) Y. F. Deng and A. cerana. (p) Phanera championii Benth. and A. cerana.
Figure 2. The ecological environments and nectar plants in Guangxi. (a,b) The ecological environment where the A. florea lives. (c) Tetradium ruticarpum (A. Juss.) T. G. Hartley and A. florea. (d) Cyanthillium patulum (Aiton) H. Rob. and A. florea. (e,f) The ecological environment where the A. dorsata lives. (g) Pericallis hybrida B. Nord. and A. dorsata. (h) Tetradium ruticarpum (A. Juss.) T. G. Hartley and A. dorsata. (i,j) The ecological environment where the A. m. ligustica lives. (k) Litchi chinensis Sonn. and A. m. ligustica. (l) Dimocarpus longan Lour. and A. m. ligustica. (m,n) The ecological environment where the A. cerana lives. (o) Heptapleurum heptaphyllum (L.) Y. F. Deng and A. cerana. (p) Phanera championii Benth. and A. cerana.
Life 15 00341 g002
Figure 3. The surveyed area of A. florea, A. dorsata, A. m. ligustica, and A. cerana.
Figure 3. The surveyed area of A. florea, A. dorsata, A. m. ligustica, and A. cerana.
Life 15 00341 g003
Figure 4. Pictures of A. florea and A. dorsata colonies. (a,b) Colony of A. florea. (c,d) Colony of A. dorsata.
Figure 4. Pictures of A. florea and A. dorsata colonies. (a,b) Colony of A. florea. (c,d) Colony of A. dorsata.
Life 15 00341 g004
Figure 5. The biological differences among the four types of honey bees: A. florea, A. dorsata, A. m. ligustica, and A. cerana in Guangxi region. (a) Swarming periods. (b) Periods with of drone brood. (c) Mating periods. (d) Honey harvest periods. (e) Broodless periods.
Figure 5. The biological differences among the four types of honey bees: A. florea, A. dorsata, A. m. ligustica, and A. cerana in Guangxi region. (a) Swarming periods. (b) Periods with of drone brood. (c) Mating periods. (d) Honey harvest periods. (e) Broodless periods.
Life 15 00341 g005
Figure 6. Pictures of A. florea and A. dorsata. (a) The queen of A. florea. (b) The worker of A. florea. (c) Top-down view of the queen and worker of A. florea, with the queen on the left and the worker on the right. (d) The queen of A. dorsata. (e) The worker of A. dorsata. (f) Top-down view of the queen and worker of A. dorsata, with the queen on the left and the worker on the right.
Figure 6. Pictures of A. florea and A. dorsata. (a) The queen of A. florea. (b) The worker of A. florea. (c) Top-down view of the queen and worker of A. florea, with the queen on the left and the worker on the right. (d) The queen of A. dorsata. (e) The worker of A. dorsata. (f) Top-down view of the queen and worker of A. dorsata, with the queen on the left and the worker on the right.
Life 15 00341 g006
Figure 7. The morphological characteristics that have undergone significant changes in A. florea and A. dorsata over the past 10 years. (a) The forewing length and width of A. florea in 2012 and 2023. (b) The changed wing angles of A. florea in 2012 and 2023. (c) The changed morphological characteristics of body size of A. dorsata in 2012 and 2023. (d) The changed wing angles of A. dorsata in 2012 and 2023. Note: A. florea (2012) represents the morphological data of the A. florea collected in the year 2012. A. florea (2023) represents the morphological data of the A. florea collected in the year 2023. A. dorsata (2012) represents the morphological data of the A. dorsata collected in the year 2012. A. dorsata (2023) represents the morphological data of the A. dorsata collected in the year 2023. * p < 0.05.** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. The morphological characteristics that have undergone significant changes in A. florea and A. dorsata over the past 10 years. (a) The forewing length and width of A. florea in 2012 and 2023. (b) The changed wing angles of A. florea in 2012 and 2023. (c) The changed morphological characteristics of body size of A. dorsata in 2012 and 2023. (d) The changed wing angles of A. dorsata in 2012 and 2023. Note: A. florea (2012) represents the morphological data of the A. florea collected in the year 2012. A. florea (2023) represents the morphological data of the A. florea collected in the year 2023. A. dorsata (2012) represents the morphological data of the A. dorsata collected in the year 2012. A. dorsata (2023) represents the morphological data of the A. dorsata collected in the year 2023. * p < 0.05.** p < 0.01.
Life 15 00341 g007
Figure 8. The results of CV for morphological characteristics of A. florea, A. dorsata, A. m. ligustic, and A. cerana. (a) The CV related to body hair. (b) The CV related to legs. (c) The CV related to wings. (d) The CV related to body size.
Figure 8. The results of CV for morphological characteristics of A. florea, A. dorsata, A. m. ligustic, and A. cerana. (a) The CV related to body hair. (b) The CV related to legs. (c) The CV related to wings. (d) The CV related to body size.
Life 15 00341 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qu, X.; Zhang, X.; Sun, T.; Qiu, Z.; Lu, Q.; Bi, Z.; Qin, H.; Hu, J.; Tang, P.; Cao, L.; et al. Investigation and Study on the Biology and Morphology of Apis florea and Apis dorsata in Southern China. Life 2025, 15, 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030341

AMA Style

Qu X, Zhang X, Sun T, Qiu Z, Lu Q, Bi Z, Qin H, Hu J, Tang P, Cao L, et al. Investigation and Study on the Biology and Morphology of Apis florea and Apis dorsata in Southern China. Life. 2025; 15(3):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qu, Xinying, Xinru Zhang, Tian Sun, Zequn Qiu, Qihuang Lu, Zhenghui Bi, Hanrong Qin, Junjun Hu, Peng Tang, Lianfei Cao, and et al. 2025. "Investigation and Study on the Biology and Morphology of Apis florea and Apis dorsata in Southern China" Life 15, no. 3: 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030341

APA Style

Qu, X., Zhang, X., Sun, T., Qiu, Z., Lu, Q., Bi, Z., Qin, H., Hu, J., Tang, P., Cao, L., & Chen, X. (2025). Investigation and Study on the Biology and Morphology of Apis florea and Apis dorsata in Southern China. Life, 15(3), 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop