Next Article in Journal
Casomorphine-10 (CM-10) Peptide Orchestrates Circadian and Neurodevelopmental Gene Clusters via δ-Opioid Receptor Signaling: Insights from Transcriptome Analysis with δ-Opioid Receptor-Expressing HEK293 Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Translating Metabolic Interventions into Breast Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrating Novel Biomarkers into Clinical Practice: A Practical Framework for Diagnosis and Management of Cardiorenal Syndrome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Protocol Biopsies Reveal Progressive Arteriolar Thickening as a Predictor of Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients

by
Diana Rodríguez-Espinosa
1,
Evelyn Hermida
1,
Agustín Leal-Cúpich
1,
Adriana García
2,
Ana Belén Larque
2,
Elena Cuadrado-Payán
1,
Elena Guillén-Olmos
1,
Marina Moncada
1,
Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
1,
David Cucchiari
1,3,
Nuria Esforzado
1,3,
Ignacio Revuelta
1,
Fritz Diekmann
1,3,
José Vicente Torregrosa
1 and
José Jesús Broseta
1,3,*
1
Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
2
Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
3
Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2025, 15(10), 1635; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101635
Submission received: 12 September 2025 / Revised: 13 October 2025 / Accepted: 17 October 2025 / Published: 20 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiorenal Disease: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatments)

Abstract

Kidney transplant recipients remain at high risk of cardiovascular events and premature death. Whether chronic histological changes in protocol allograft biopsies provide prognostic information for patient outcomes beyond graft survival remains uncertain. In this prospective study of 458 kidney transplant recipients with biopsies performed at 3 and 12 months and followed up to 8 years, we assessed the association between vascular and interstitial lesions and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) or all-cause mortality. Fifty-eight patients (12.7%) died and 49 (10.7%) experienced MACEs during follow-up. The most notable finding was that progression of hyaline arteriolar thickening (aah) between 3 and 12 months independently predicted all-cause mortality, even after adjustment for estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, and previous cardiovascular disease. In addition, vascular fibrous intimal thickening at 12 months was also independently associated with mortality, while associations of baseline vascular or interstitial lesions were attenuated after full multivariable adjustment. These results suggest that progressive aah reflects an ongoing recipient-related vascular process rather than donor-derived injury. Monitoring this dynamic histological change in repeated biopsies performed for protocol or for cause may provide transplant nephrologists with an early signal of increased mortality risk.

1. Introduction

Kidney transplantation stands out as the optimal therapeutic choice for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients, offering superior outcomes in terms of both mortality and quality of life. Despite these advantages, recipients of kidney transplants continue to face elevated rates of cardiovascular events [1], constituting the primary cause of mortality among this group [2]. The heightened incidence of cardiovascular outcomes in ESKD is attributed to a multitude of factors, including diminished renal function and prevalent comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, vascular calcification, and atherosclerosis [3,4].
Assessing kidney graft biopsies is crucial for interpreting information within the context of renal function [5]. Protocol biopsies are primarily performed in many centers to detect subclinical rejection. However, they may also provide valuable information on chronic vascular and interstitial remodeling that reflects systemic processes beyond the allograft itself. Evidence suggests that urinary fibrosis markers and vascular calcification are independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and death, irrespective of eGFR [6,7]. Whether chronic histological changes in protocol allograft biopsies provide prognostic information for patient outcomes beyond graft survival remains uncertain.
This study aimed to address this gap by assessing the impact of vascular and interstitial changes on long-term mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

Every KTR from Hospital Clínic of Barcelona who received a kidney transplant between March 2015 and March 2019 was considered for inclusion in this prospective observational study. Seventy-two patients were not analyzed either because they got lost to follow-up during the study time or due to early graft loss, defined as graft failure within the first 30 days after kidney transplantation. The subjects included were followed from transplantation day until March 2023.

2.2. Variables

The variables were collected from electronic health records. They consisted of demographic (age, gender, and ethnicity), past renal history (time on kidney replacement therapy, baseline etiology of kidney disease, transplant number, and type of donor), comorbidities at the time of transplantation (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, body mass index, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and smoking status), laboratory tests (creatinine, phosphate, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, and parathyroid hormone [PTH]), induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, and protocol allograft biopsy findings at 3 and 12 months after transplantation. Hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphatemia were defined as ≤2.5 mg/dL and ≥4.5 mg/dL, respectively. eGFR was calculated with the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula [8], and pathology findings were reported according to the Banff classification [9]. The individual scores for interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were added to determine IFTA, the scores for glomerulitis and mesangial expansion to determine glomerulopathy and arteriolar hyalinosis with vascular fibrous intimal thickening to determine vasculopathy [6]. Creatinine and phosphate levels were registered at the three time points (baseline or day of transplantation, three months after transplantation coinciding with the first protocol graft biopsy, and 12 months after transplantation coinciding with the second protocol biopsy). 25-hydroxy vitamin D and PTH were registered at baseline and 12 months after transplantation. Progression of histopathological lesions was evaluated only in patients with paired 3- and 12-month protocol biopsies. Patients with only one available biopsy were excluded from progression analyses. Two experienced renal pathologists independently scored the biopsies according to Banff 2018 [9], with discrepancies resolved by consensus.

2.3. Study Outcomes

All-cause mortality and the composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) that included myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, hospitalizations for heart failure, and all-cause and cardiovascular death that occurred during follow-up were recorded. Pathology alterations were reported according to the Banff Classification of Allograft Pathology [9,10].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data are presented as mean and standard deviation when normally distributed, and as median and interquartile range otherwise. Qualitative variables are represented as absolute and relative frequencies. The statistical inference between groups was performed by Student’s t-test when quantitative variables were normally distributed, while the Mann–Whitney test was used for skewed data. Differences in qualitative variables were analyzed with the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test when one or more expected values were less than five or the data were very unequally distributed among the table’s cells. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore the relationship between the survival event-free time of patients and one or more predictor variables. Statistical significance was assumed when the p-value was inferior to 0.05 on all statistical tests. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM’s SPSS Statistics software in its 26th version.

2.5. Institutional Review Board Statement and Ethical Statement

This study has been evaluated and approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (HCB/2020/0380, 30 April 2020). The data collection has followed the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation), its subordinate national and regional laws, the Declaration of Helsinki principles, and the principles of the Declaration of Istanbul as outlined in the ‘Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism.’

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

A total population of 530 patients received a kidney transplant between March 2015 and May 2020. Seventy-two patients were excluded from the analysis because of the causes detailed in Figure 1. Among the 458 patients included, 159 had paired 3- and 12-month protocol biopsies, which were used for progression analyses. Ethnicity, age, comorbidities, type of donor, and other included population characteristics are further detailed in Table 1.

3.2. Vascular Lesions

One hundred and ninety-eight (68.9%), 24 (6.2%), and 79 (27%) patients had vascular fibrous intimal thickening (cv), hyaline arteriolar thickening (aah), and arteriolar hyalinosis (ah) scores greater than zero, respectively. By the twelve-month biopsy, these vascular alterations had progressed in 29.2%, 9.4%, and 23.3% of patients, respectively. Patients with a history of hypertension had worse cv scores at the three-month biopsy (71.7% vs. 56%, p = 0.026). Recipients of deceased-donor kidneys showed higher cv scores at three months (75.8% vs. 53.4%, p < 0.001) and higher cv and ah scores at twelve months (74.9% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.011; and 40% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.005, respectively) compared with those receiving living-donor kidneys. Patients with diabetes or hyperphosphatemia had higher aah scores at three months (11.2% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.009; and 16.7% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.035, respectively). Those with dyslipidemia had higher ah scores at twelve months (40% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.039). No significant differences in vasculopathy were observed between smokers and non-smokers; however, active smokers more frequently showed progression of aah from three to twelve months (30.8% vs. 7.5%, OR 5.45 [1.45–20.59], p = 0.006).

3.3. Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy (IFTA)

At three months post-transplantation, 206 patients (44.6%) had tubular atrophy (ct) and 148 (32.3%) had interstitial fibrosis (ci) greater than zero. Only 29% and 14% of patients showed neither lesion at the three- and twelve-month biopsies, respectively. By twelve months, IFTA had progressed in 69 patients (15.1%) with ci and in 58 patients (12.7%) with ct. Progressive ci was significantly associated with maintenance immunosuppressive therapy including mTOR inhibitors (43.6% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.042), and with a lower eGFR at twelve months (44.8 vs. 52.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.004).

3.4. All-Cause Mortality

Fifty-eight patients (12.7%) died during follow-up. The most common cause of death was infection (22, 4.8%), followed by cancer (11, 2.4%), cardiovascular disease (10, 2.2%), and other causes (15, 3.3%). In univariate analysis, the histopathologic variables associated with all-cause mortality were interstitial fibrosis at three months (ci > 0), progressive hyaline arteriolar thickening (aah) between three and twelve months, and vascular fibrous intimal thickening at twelve months (cv > 1). After multivariable adjustment in the four Cox regression models, progressive aah at twelve months and 12-month (Figure 2) cv > 1 remained significantly associated with mortality (Table 2). When vascular, glomerular, and tubulointerstitial lesions were analyzed as grouped variables without applying a cut-off, vasculopathy showed a significant association with all-cause mortality after adjustment for eGFR, diabetes, cardiovascular history, age, and dialysis vintage (Figure 3).

3.5. Cardiovascular Events

Fatal cardiovascular events occurred in 10 patients (2.2%), non-fatal events in 44 (9.6%), and MACEs in 49 (10.7%). A three-month cv score greater than 2 was significantly associated with the occurrence of fatal and non-fatal events as well as MACEs. This association remained significant after adjustment for eGFR, diabetes, and previous cardiovascular history, but was no longer significant after adjustment for age and dialysis vintage (Table 2).

3.6. Other Clinical Variables

To assess the independent associations between histopathologic findings and clinical outcomes, we constructed multivariable Cox regression models. Covariates were selected based on their clinical relevance and statistical significance in univariate analyses. The final models included variables that remained significant in the multivariate analysis, as shown in Table 3 and Table 4. A history of cardiovascular disease [HR 4.3, 95% CI (2.45–7.53), p <0.001], p = 0.01], recipient age [HR 1.05, 95% CI (1.03–1.08), p < 0.001], hypophosphatemia [HR 2.5, 95% CI (1.25–5.05), p = 0.01], and dialysis vintage [HR 1.003, 95% CI (1–1.005), p = 0.003] were associated with an increased risk of MACEs, while history of cardiovascular disease [HR 3.84, 95% CI (2.08–7.09), p < 0.001], and recipient age [HR 1.05, 95% CI (1.02–1.08) p = 0.001) were associated with a non-fatal cardiovascular event.

4. Discussion

In this study, we found that progression of aah between 3 and 12 months was independently associated with all-cause mortality, highlighting the role of ongoing recipient-related vascular remodeling. Vascular fibrous intimal thickening at 12 months also predicted mortality. Furthermore, recipients with smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hyperphosphatemia, or hypertension, as well as those who received a deceased-donor graft, were more likely to develop chronic vascular lesions
Our cohort’s overall incidence of cardiovascular events was similar to those previously reported in developed countries, as we found 10.7% of MACEs, while others reported 8.3% [11]. However, the most frequent cause of death in our cohort was infections, which, in fact, doubled the number of cases of cardiovascular death and cancer, respectively. A higher number of deaths related to infection was reported in other cohorts, although the difference was still smaller than in our population compared to cardiovascular disease or malignancy [12,13]. Infection-related deaths may partly reflect the inclusion of follow-up years coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic, which substantially affected immunosuppressed populations [14].
In our study, the most relevant finding was that progression of aah between 3 and 12 months independently predicted all-cause mortality. Both ah and aah are scored within the Banff classification, though they capture related but distinct patterns of vascular injury. While ah reflects hyaline deposition within the arteriolar wall and may result from multiple factors such as hypertension, diabetes, or calcineurin inhibitor exposure, aah describes a concentric thickening of the arteriolar media. Importantly, aah was introduced in the Banff classification to improve reproducibility and diagnostic value in the assessment of chronic vascular lesions. The progression of this lesion is unlikely to represent donor-derived injury and instead suggests an ongoing recipient-related vascular process. Vascular fibrous intimal thickening at 12 months was also independently associated with mortality, although changes between month 3 and 12 of this parameter were not correlated with adverse outcomes. An inflammatory environment that could induce systemic vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction with poor long-term outcomes in transplant recipients [15]. Our findings extend previous observations in non-transplant CKD cohorts, where arteriolar or arterial sclerosis predicted cardiovascular events and death [6]. Unlike this study, we demonstrate that, in KTRs, the progression of hyaline arteriolar thickening, rather than baseline lesions, provides independent prognostic information for patient survival.
There are multiple hits that could lead to graft vasculopathy. For instance, there is evidence that associates late rejection in living KTRs with cardiovascular events, though they do not specify on the histopathologic lesions found [16]. Also, inflammation coming from the donated kidney and aggravated by ischemia–reperfusion injury may induce a vicious cycle of fibrosis and inflammation where fibroblasts release pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) and growth factors (like TGF-β) [17,18], which may further stimulate inflammation elsewhere. In our cohort specific cytokine or fibrosis biomarkers were not available, as they are not routinely measured during standard clinical follow-up. Future studies including stored samples could further clarify these associations. Additionally, immunosuppressive treatment with calcineurin inhibitors induces oxidative stress and impairs vasodilation by decreasing fibrinolytic activity in vessel walls, increasing intracellular calcium in vascular smooth muscle cells, contributing to vascular stiffness, inflammation, and fibrosis [19,20,21]. These changes in vascular remodeling likely accelerate vasculopathy and compromise graft and patient survival [19,22].
The role of inflammation, particularly vascular inflammation and cardiovascular disease, is well established. Matrix metalloproteinases and cytokines, which are upregulated with aging and in response to chronic immunosuppression, promote vascular remodeling and intimal thickening [23,24,25,26,27]. This remodeling can lead to narrowing of the vessel lumen, reducing end-organ perfusion, and potentially exacerbating cardiovascular risk [28,29]. We did not find an association between maintenance immunosuppressive treatment and vasculopathy or mortality and MACEs. This supports current knowledge despite preclinical studies demonstrated that sirolimus attenuated vascular and myocardial fibrosis [30,31], and everolimus improved post-myocardial infarction remodeling [30,32]. The impact of mTOR inhibitors on hard cardiovascular outcomes has been mixed [33,34,35], though many studies were underpowered to detect differences in cardiovascular outcomes [28].
To our knowledge, this is the first work that has looked for a relationship between cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with histopathologic findings on protocol kidney graft biopsies. Nevertheless, there is a recent publication where the authors looked for a similar association, although it was held in CKD patients, not kidney recipients [6]. There, they found a significant association between mesangial expansion, IFTA, and arterial and arteriolar sclerosis with MACEs and death. Although when adjusting for other factors, the only variables that remained significant were mesangial expansion and arterial sclerosis [6]. We did not find any significant association between mesangial expansion and mortality or MACEs. As populations were different, where one had a longer CKD history of disease and was mostly not under immunosuppressants, these findings are not fully comparable. Still, they show a relationship between histology findings and systemic disease manifestations and vice versa [23,36].
Concerning other related factors, we found that hyperphosphatemia, active smoking, and diabetes were associated with vascular lesions, as has been described in non-transplanted CKD patients [37,38,39,40]. However, these factors alone were not independently associated with MACEs, or patient survival during our study’s follow-up. Curiously, we found that pre-transplantation hypophosphatemia was significantly associated with MACEs, something that has been described in the general population [41,42] but not in KTRs [43]. We believe that these findings warrant further research as they may be associated with malnutrition and other potentially related causes (e.g., repeated admissions, chronic inflammation) that fall beyond the scope of this paper.
This study has several limitations. It was conducted at a single center with a moderate sample size, and not all patients underwent both protocol biopsies. Protocol biopsies also provide information at specific time points and may not fully capture dynamic changes. Renal function may have been overestimated, as transplant recipients often lose muscle mass due to chronic steroid use or comorbidities, and cystatin C–based eGFR was not available [44,45]. Donor-related risk factors were not collected, and information on concomitant therapies after biopsy findings (e.g., statins, RAAS inhibitors, aspirin) was lacking. Follow-up time, although up to eight years, may still have been insufficient for some events to occur, and given that many patients were transplanted outside our autonomous region, some events may not have been recorded. Despite these limitations, the use of standardized Banff scoring, prospective data collection, and robust multivariable models strengthen the validity of our results.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, protocol kidney allograft biopsies provide prognostic information that extends beyond rejection monitoring. Among chronic histological lesions, progression of hyaline arteriolar thickening between 3 and 12 months emerged as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, supporting the biological plausibility of an active, recipient-related vascular process rather than donor-derived damage. Vascular fibrous intimal thickening at 12 months was also associated with mortality, but only aah progression offered a dynamic signal of ongoing vascular remodeling. These findings suggest that repeated biopsy assessment may not only inform graft status but also serve as a window into systemic cardiovascular vulnerability in KTRs. Until further studies are performed, the management of cardiovascular risk factors should be optimized in these individuals. Larger studies are needed to validate these observations and explore how histological monitoring might be integrated into cardiovascular risk stratification after transplantation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.R.-E. and J.J.B.; methodology, J.J.B.; software, D.R.-E.; validation, E.C.-P., and E.G.-O.; formal analysis, D.R.-E.; investigation, E.H., A.G., M.M., A.B.L., and A.L.-C.; resources, P.V.-A., D.C., N.E., I.R.; data curation, E.H.; writing—original draft preparation, D.R.-E., and J.J.B.; writing—review and editing J.J.B., and F.D.; supervision, F.D., and J.V.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (HCB/2020/0380, 30 April 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available on GitHub (https://github.com/Broseta/Kidney-trasnplantation/blob/main/datos.csv).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
aahHyaline Arteriolar Thickening
ahArteriolar Hyalinosis
CKDChronic Kidney Disease
ciInterstitial Fibrosis
CKD-EPIChronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration
ctTubular Atrophy
cvVascular Fibrous Intimal Thickening
eGFREstimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
ESKDEnd-Stage Kidney Disease
IFTAInterstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy
KTRKidney Transplant Recipient
MACEsMajor Adverse Cardiovascular Events
PTHParathyroid hormone

References

  1. Kasiske, B.L.; Chakkera, H.A.; Roel, J. Explained and unexplained ischemic heart disease risk after renal transplantation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000, 11, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Briggs, J.D. Causes of death after renal transplantation. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2001, 16, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jankowski, J.; Floege, J.; Fliser, D.; Böhm, M.; Marx, N. Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease: Pathophysiological Insights and Therapeutic Options. Circulation 2021, 143, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Harding, J.L.; Pavkov, M.; Wang, Z.; Benoit, S.; Burrows, N.R.; Imperatore, G.; Albright, A.L.; Patzer, R. Long-term mortality among kidney transplant recipients with and without diabetes: A nationwide cohort study in the USA. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2021, 9, 1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roufosse, C.; Naesens, M.; Haas, M.; Lefaucheur, C.; Mannon, R.B.; Afrouzian, M.; Alachkar, N.; Aubert, O.; Bagnasco, S.M.; Batal, I.; et al. The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Work Plan: Data-driven refinement of the Banff Classification for renal allografts. Am. J. Transplant. 2023, 24, 350–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buckley, L.F.; Schmidt, I.M.; Verma, A.; Palsson, R.; Adam, D.; Shah, A.M.; Srivastava, A.; Waikar, S.S. Associations Between Kidney Histopathologic Lesions and Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2023, 8, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Park, M.; Katz, R.; Shlipak, M.G.; Weiner, D.; Tracy, R.; Jotwani, V.; Hughes-Austin, J.; Gabbai, F.; Hsu, C.Y.; Pfeffer, M.; et al. Urinary Markers of Fibrosis and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Death in Kidney Transplant Recipients: The FAVORIT Trial. Am. J. Transplant. 2017, 17, 2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Levey, A.S.; Stevens, L.A.; Schmid, C.H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Castro, A.F., 3rd; Feldman, H.I.; Kusek, J.W.; Eggers, P.; Van Lente, F.; Greene, T.; et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 150, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Roufosse, C.; Simmonds, N.; Groningen, M.C.-V.; Haas, M.; Henriksen, K.J.; Horsfield, C.; Loupy, A.; Mengel, M.; Perkowska-Ptasińska, A.; Rabant, M.; et al. A 2018 Reference Guide to the Banff Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology. Transplantation 2018, 102, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Solez, K.; Axelsen, R.A.; Benediktsson, H.; Burdick, J.F.; Cohen, A.H.; Colvin, R.B.; Croker, B.P.; Droz, D.; Dunnill, M.S.; Halloran, P.F.; et al. International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: The Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int. 1993, 44, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andersson, C.; Hansen, D.; Sørensen, S.S.; McGrath, M.; McCausland, F.R.; Torp-Pedersen, C.; Schou, M.; Køber, L.; A Pfeffer, M. Long-term cardiovascular events, graft failure, and mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2023, 121, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vogelzang, J.L.; van Stralen, K.J.; Noordzij, M.; Diez, J.A.; Carrero, J.J.; Couchoud, C.; Dekker, F.W.; Finne, P.; Fouque, D.; Heaf, J.G.; et al. Mortality from infections and malignancies in patients treated with renal replacement therapy: Data from the ERA-EDTA registry. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2015, 30, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Weinrauch, L.A.; D’Elia, J.A.; Weir, M.R.; Bunnapradist, S.; Finn, P.V.; Liu, J.; Claggett, B.; Monaco, A.P. Infection and Malignancy Outweigh Cardiovascular Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Post Hoc Analysis of the FAVORIT Trial. Am. J. Med. 2018, 131, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Smith, B.; Nair, S.; Wadei, H.; Mai, M.; Khamash, H.; Schinstock, C.; Liang, Y.; Abdelrheem, A.; Park, W.; Badley, A.; et al. Increased Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients During the Delta/Omicron Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic Despite Widespread Vaccination. Clin. Transplant. 2025, 39, e70071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Von Rossum, A.; Laher, I.; Choy, J.C. Immune-Mediated Vascular Injury and Dysfunction in Transplant Arteriosclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Okamoto, T.; Hatakeyama, S.; Hamaya, T.; Matsuura, T.; Saito, M.; Nishida, H.; Maita, S.; Murakami, R.; Tomita, H.; Saitoh, H.; et al. Impact of timing of rejection episode on cardiovascular events in living donor kidney transplantation: A multicenter retrospective study. J. Nephrol. 2023, 36, 2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Smolgovsky, S.; Theall, B.; Wagner, N.; Alcaide, P. Fibroblasts and immune cells: At the crossroad of organ inflammation and fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2024, 326, H303–H316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cohen, C.; Mhaidly, R.; Croizer, H.; Kieffer, Y.; Leclere, R.; Vincent-Salomon, A.; Robley, C.; Anglicheau, D.; Rabant, M.; Sannier, A.; et al. WNT-dependent interaction between inflammatory fibroblasts and FOLR2+ macrophages promotes fibrosis in chronic kidney disease. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tepperman, E.; Ramzy, D.; Prodger, J.; Sheshgiri, R.; Badiwala, M.; Ross, H.; Rao, V. Vascular effects of immunosuppression. Can. J. Surg. 2010, 53, 57. [Google Scholar]
  20. Redondo-Horcajo, M.; Romero, N.; Martínez-Acedo, P.; Martínez-Ruiz, A.; Quijano, C.; Lourenço, C.F.; Movilla, N.; Enríquez, J.A.; Rodríguez-Pascual, F.; Rial, E.; et al. Cyclosporine A-induced nitration of tyrosine 34 MnSOD in endothelial cells: Role of mitochondrial superoxide. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010, 87, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Diederich, D.; Skopec, J.; Diederich, A.; Dai, F.X. Cyclosporine produces endothelial dysfunction by increased production of superoxide. Hypertension 1994, 23 Pt 2, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Flechner, S.M.; Kobashigawa, J.; Klintmalm, G. Calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in solid organ transplantation: Focus on improving renal function and nephrotoxicity. Clin. Transplant. 2008, 22, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meng, X.M.; Nikolic-Paterson, D.J.; Lan, H.Y. Inflammatory processes in renal fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2014, 10, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Noronha, I.L.; Krüger, C.; Andrassy, K.; Ritz, E.; Waldherr, R. In situ production of TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta and IL-2R in ANCA-positive glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 1993, 43, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tipping, P.G.; Lowe, M.G.; Holdsworth, S.R. Glomerular macrophages express augmented procoagulant activity in experimental fibrin-related glomerulonephritis in rabbits. J. Clin. Investig. 1988, 82, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tan, T.K.; Zheng, G.; Hsu, T.-T.; Wang, Y.; Lee, V.W.; Tian, X.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Harris, D.C. Macrophage matrix metalloproteinase-9 mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in vitro in murine renal tubular cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kui Tan, T.; Zheng, G.; Hsu, T.T.; Ra Lee, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Tian, X.; Wang, Y.; Min Wang, Y.; Cao, Q.; et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 of tubular and macrophage origin contributes to the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis via macrophage recruitment through osteopontin cleavage. Lab. Investig. 2013, 93, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Elezaby, A.; Dexheimer, R.; Sallam, K. Cardiovascular effects of immunosuppression agents. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 981838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cheng, D.C.Y.; Climie, R.E.; Shu, M.; Grieve, S.M.; Kozor, R.; Figtree, G.A. Vascular aging and cardiovascular disease: Pathophysiology and measurement in the coronary arteries. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1206156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alnsasra, H.; Asleh, R.; Oh, J.K.; Maleszewski, J.J.; Lerman, A.; Toya, T.; Chandrasekaran, K.; Bois, M.C.; Kushwaha, S.S. Impact of Sirolimus as a Primary Immunosuppressant on Myocardial Fibrosis and Diastolic Function Following Heart Transplantation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e018186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Raichlin, E.; Chandrasekaran, K.; Kremers, W.K.; Frantz, R.P.; Clavell, A.L.; Pereira, N.L.; Rodeheffer, R.J.; Daly, R.C.; McGregor, C.G.A.; Edwards, B.S.; et al. Sirolimus as primary immunosuppressant reduces left ventricular mass and improves diastolic function of the cardiac allograft. Transplantation 2008, 86, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Anthony, C.; Imran, M.; Pouliopoulos, J.; Emmanuel, S.; Iliff, J.W.; Moffat, K.J.; Ross, J.; Graham, R.M.; Kotlyar, E.; Muthiah, K.; et al. Everolimus for the Prevention of Calcineurin-Inhibitor-Induced Left Ventricular Hypertrophy After Heart Transplantation (RADTAC Study). JACC Hear. Fail. 2021, 9, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pipeleers, L.; Abramowicz, D.; Broeders, N.; Lemoine, A.; Peeters, P.; Van Laecke, S.; Weekers, L.E.; Sennesael, J.; Wissing, K.M.; Geers, C.; et al. 5-Year outcomes of the prospective and randomized CISTCERT study comparing steroid withdrawal to replacement of cyclosporine with everolimus in de novo kidney transplant patients. Transpl. Int. 2021, 34, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Holdaas, H.; de Fijter, J.W.; Cruzado, J.M.; Massari, P.; Nashan, B.; Kanellis, J.; Witzke, O.; Gutierrez-Dalmau, A.; Turkmen, A.; Wang, Z.; et al. Cardiovascular Parameters to 2 years After Kidney Transplantation Following Early Switch to Everolimus Without Calcineurin Inhibitor Therapy: An Analysis of the Randomized ELEVATE Study. Transplantation 2017, 101, 2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. van Dijk, M.; van Roon, A.M.; Said, M.Y.; Bemelman, F.J.; Homan van der Heide, J.J.; de Fijter, H.W.; de Vries, A.P.; Bakker, S.J.; Sanders, J.S.F. Long-term cardiovascular outcome of renal transplant recipients after early conversion to everolimus compared to calcineurin inhibition: Results from the randomized controlled MECANO trial. Transpl. Int. 2018, 31, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schlöndorff, D.; Banas, B. The mesangial cell revisited: No cell is an island. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 1179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Morimoto, K.; Matsui, M.; Samejima, K.; Kanki, T.; Nishimoto, M.; Tanabe, K.; Murashima, M.; Eriguchi, M.; Akai, Y.; Iwano, M.; et al. Renal arteriolar hyalinosis, not intimal thickening in large arteries, is associated with cardiovascular events in people with biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy. Diabet. Med. 2020, 37, 2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moriya, T.; Yamagishi, T.; Yoshida, Y.; Matsubara, M.; Ouchi, M. Arteriolar hyalinosis is related to rapid GFR decline and long-standing GFR changes observed on renal biopsies in normo-microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients. J. Diabetes Its Complicat. 2021, 35, 107847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mencke, R.; Umbach, A.T.; Wiggenhauser, L.M.; Voelkl, J.; Olauson, H.; Harms, G.; Bulthuis, M.; Krenning, G.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L.; van Goor, H.; et al. Klotho Deficiency Induces Arteriolar Hyalinosis in a Trade-Off with Vascular Calcification. Am. J. Pathol. 2019, 189, 2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lhotta, K.; Rumpelt, H.J.; König, P.; Mayer, G.; Kronenberg, F. Cigarette smoking and vascular pathology in renal biopsies. Kidney Int. 2002, 61, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ariyoshi, N.; Nogi, M.; Ando, A.; Watanabe, H.; Umekawa, S. Hypophosphatemia-induced Cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 352, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ariyoshi, N.; Nogi, M.; Ando, A.; Watanabe, H.; Umekawad, S. Cardiovascular consequences of hypophosphatemia. Panminerva Medica 2017, 59, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. van Londen, M.; Aarts, B.M.; Deetman, P.E.; van der Weijden, J.; Eisenga, M.F.; Navis, G.; Bakker, S.J.; de Borst, M.H.; NIGRAM Consortium. Post-Transplant Hypophosphatemia and the Risk of Death-Censored Graft Failure and Mortality after Kidney Transplantation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 12, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Choi, M.C.; Kim, D.G.; Yim, S.H.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, H.W.; Yang, J.; Kim, B.S.; Huh, K.H.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, J. Creatinine-cystatin C ratio and death with a functioning graft in kidney transplant recipients. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Osaka, T.; Hamaguchi, M.; Hashimoto, Y.; Ushigome, E.; Tanaka, M.; Yamazaki, M.; Fukui, M. Decreased the creatinine to cystatin C ratio is a surrogate marker of sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 139, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow diagram with the number of individuals and reasons for exclusion or loss to follow-up.
Figure 1. Flow diagram with the number of individuals and reasons for exclusion or loss to follow-up.
Life 15 01635 g001
Figure 2. Adjusted patient survival curves according to the presence of arteriolar hyalinosis (aah), derived from the multivariable Cox model. The analysis was adjusted for age, diabetes, cardiovascular history, dialysis vintage, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and 12 months. Patients with aah (red line) showed significantly lower adjusted survival probabilities (p = 0.017).
Figure 2. Adjusted patient survival curves according to the presence of arteriolar hyalinosis (aah), derived from the multivariable Cox model. The analysis was adjusted for age, diabetes, cardiovascular history, dialysis vintage, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and 12 months. Patients with aah (red line) showed significantly lower adjusted survival probabilities (p = 0.017).
Life 15 01635 g002
Figure 3. Forest plot showing the association between chronic histopathologic lesions and all-cause mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are derived from multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, cardiovascular history, age, and dialysis vintage. Only vasculopathy (arteriolar hyalinosis + vascular fibrous intimal thickening) showed a statistically significant association with mortality (p = 0.042).
Figure 3. Forest plot showing the association between chronic histopathologic lesions and all-cause mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are derived from multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, cardiovascular history, age, and dialysis vintage. Only vasculopathy (arteriolar hyalinosis + vascular fibrous intimal thickening) showed a statistically significant association with mortality (p = 0.042).
Life 15 01635 g003
Table 1. Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics of study participants.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics of study participants.
VariableStudy Population (n = 458)
Age, median (IQR)58 (48.8–67)
Male sex, n (%)281 (61.4%)
Race, n (%)
  White435 (95%)
  Latin American16 (3.5%)
  Asian5 (1.1%)
  Black2 (0.4%)
Smoking, n (%)46 (10%)
Pre-transplant diabetes, n (%)
  Type 124 (5.2%)
  Type 2100 (21.8%)
Pre-transplant hypertension, n (%)386 (84.3%)
Pre-transplant BMI, Kg/m2, median (IQR)25.3 (6.93)
Pre-transplant cardiovascular disease, n (%)81 (17.7%)
Pre-transplant hypophosphatemia, n (%)43 (9.5%)
Pre-transplant hyperphosphatemia, n (%)225 (49.5%)
Pre-transplant vitamin D deficiency, n (%)200 (44.4%)
Pre-transplant dyslipidemia, n (%)196 (42.8%)
Deceased donor, n (%)
  DCD150 (32.7%)
  DBD173 (37.8%)
Dialysis vintage, months, median (IQR)30 (9.8–103.3)
DBD, dead brain donor; DCD, donor after circulatory death; IQR, interquartile range.
Table 2. Association of chronic histopathologic lesions with all-cause mortality and fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular outcomes.
Table 2. Association of chronic histopathologic lesions with all-cause mortality and fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular outcomes.
VariableOverall
n (%)
UnadjustedAdjusted—Model 1
(eGFR)
Adjusted—Model 2
(DM and CV History)
Adjusted—Model 3
(Age and Dialysis Vintage)
Adjusted—Model 4
(Models 1–3)
HR (CI 95%)p-ValueHR (CI 95%)p-ValueHR (CI 95%)p-ValueHR (CI 95%)p-ValueHR (CI 95%)p-Value
All-cause mortality58 (12.7%)
3-m. Interstitial fibrosis > 5%148 (32.3%)2.5 (1.05–5.06)0.0382.57 (0.88–7.51)0.0842.47 (1.02–5.98)0.0452.32 (0.96–5.6)0.062.34 (0.89–6.14)0.084
Progressive hyaline arteriolar thickening15 (9.4%)4.7 (1.21–18.32)0.0265.03 (1.23–19.64)0.024.65 (1.17–18.47)0.0295.65 (1.4–22.8)0.0155.6 (1.36–23.19)0.017
12-m. Vascular fibrous intimal thickening > 25%45 (18.4%)3.13 (1.23–7.56)0.012.94 (1.14–7.56)0.0263.78 (1.49–9.6)0.0052.62 (1.08–6.38)0.0343.33 (1.27–8.7)0.015
Non-fatal cardiovascular events44 (9.6%)
3-m. Vascular fibrous intimal thickening > 50%18 (6.3%)5.98 (1.34–26.66)0.0195.31 (1.13–24.92)0.0349.65 (1.98–47.06)0.0053.03 (0.62–14.74)0.175.17 (0.86–31.26)0.073
Cardiovascular death10 (2.2%)
3-m. Vascular fibrous intimal thickening > 50%3 (1%)18.23 (1.64–203.26)0.01824.61 (1.44–420)0.02714.47 (1.31–160.4)0.02920.44 (0.47–886)0.11721.38 (0.35–1308)0.145
MACE49 (10.7%)
3-m. Vascular fibrous intimal thickening > 50%19 (6.6%)5.09 (1.16–22.39)0.0315.05 (1.08–23.65)0.048.64 (1.8–41.34)0.0072.21 (0.45–10.79)0.333.84 (0.62–23.95)0.15
3-m., 3-month; 12-m., 12-month; CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event.
Table 3. Association of all-cause mortality with patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics during follow-up.
Table 3. Association of all-cause mortality with patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics during follow-up.
VariableDead
n = 58 (12.7%)
Living
n = 400 (87.3%)
Univariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
p-ValueOdds Ratio or Mean/Median Difference (CI 95%)p-ValueExponentiated ß-Coefficient (CI 95%)
Age, median (IQR)68 (61.5–70.3)56 (47–65)<0.00110.47 (13.93–7.02) <0.0011.08 (1.05–1.11)
Male sex, n (%)37 (63.7%)244 (61%)0.6830.89 (0.5–1.57)
Smoking, n (%)9 (15.5%)37 (9.3%)0.1381.8 (0.82–3.96)
Dyslipidemia, n (%)31 (53.4%)165 (41.3%)0.0791.64 (0.94–2.84)
Deceased donor, n (%)49 (84.5%)274 (68.5%)0.0132.26 (1.14–4.47)0.90.99 (0.79–1.22)
3-month eGFR, median (IQR)39 (25.8–55.3)47 (33–64)0.0223.45 (−2.71–9.61)0.0360.99 (0.97–0.99)
12-month eGFR, median (IQR)41 (31.5–55.5)49 (36–65)0.0415 (−0.73–10.73)0.060.98 (0.97–1)
Dialysis vintage, months, median (IQR)34 (14.8–66.5)29 (98.3)0.8073.87 (−27.19–34.94)0.721 (0.99–1)
Pre-transplant hypertension, n (%)54 (93.1%)332 (83%)0.0482.77 (0.97–7.9)
Pre-transplant BMI, Kg/m2, mean ± SD25.47 ± 4.525.91 ± 5.360.550.44 (−1.02–1.91)
Pre-transplant diabetes, n (%)26 (44.8%)98 (24.5%)0.0012.5 (1.42–4.41)0.0022.31 (1.37–3.9)
Pre-transplant cardiovascular disease, n (%)20 (34.5%)61 (15.3%)< 0.0012.93 (1.6–5.37)0.012.06 (1.19–3.55)
Pre-transplant hypophosphatemia, n (%)10 (17.2%)33 (8.3%)0.0062.9 (1.33–6.33)0.461.35 (0.61–2.99)
SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; CI: confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range.
Table 4. Association of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes with patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics during follow-up.
Table 4. Association of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes with patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics during follow-up.
VariableMACEs
n = 49 (10.7%)
No MACEs
n = 409 (89.3%)
Univariate AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
p-ValueOdds Ratio or Mean/Median Difference (CI 95%)p-ValueExponentiated ß-Coefficient (CI 95%)
Age, median (IQR)65 (58–69.5)56 (48–66)<0.001−7.56 (−11.35–−3.76) <0.0011.05 (1.03–1.08)
Male sex, n (%)35 (71.4%)246 (60.1%)0.130.6 (0.32–1.16)
Smoking, n (%)3 (6.2%)43 (10.5%)0.330.56 (0.17–1.86)
Dyslipidemia, n (%)25 (51%)171 (41.8%)0.221.45 (0.80–2.63)
Deceased donor, n (%)40 (81.6%)283 (69.2%)0.071.84 (0.92–3.69)
  DBD, n (%)25 (51%)148 (36.2%)
  DCD, n (%)15 (30.6%)135 (33%)
12-month PTH, median (IQR)321.45 ± 297.52224.98 ± 232.750.05−96.48 (−173.39–−19.57)0.0161 (1–1.002)
3-month eGFR, median (IQR)43.5 (30–59)47 (32–63.5)0.273.45 (−2.71–9.61)
12-month eGFR, median (IQR)44 (35.3–54.8)49 (36–66)0.095 (−0.73–10.73)
Dialysis vintage, months, median (IQR)57 (31–191.5)27 (7.5–84)0.02−53.58 (−86.64–−20.51)0.0031 (1–1.01)
Pre-transplant hypertension, n (%)47 (95.9%)2 (0.4%)0.024.85 (1.15–20.45)0.0514.08 (0.99–16.8)
Pre-transplant BMI, Kg/m2, mean ± SD26.04 ± 4.6625.84 ± 5.330.8−0.2 (−1.79–1.39)
Pre-transplant diabetes, n (%)24 (48.9%)25 (6.1%)< 0.0012.97 (1.62–5.43)<0.0012.89 (1.62–4.98)
Pre-transplant cardiovascular disease, n (%)25 (51%)56 (13.7%)< 0.0016.57 (3.51–12.29)<0.0014.3 (2.45–7.53)
Pre-transplant hypophosphatemia, n (%)10 (20.4%)33 (8.1%)0.0062.9 (1.33–6.33)0.012.5 (1.25–5.05)
BMI, body mass index; CI: confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SD, standard deviation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodríguez-Espinosa, D.; Hermida, E.; Leal-Cúpich, A.; García, A.; Larque, A.B.; Cuadrado-Payán, E.; Guillén-Olmos, E.; Moncada, M.; Ventura-Aguiar, P.; Cucchiari, D.; et al. Protocol Biopsies Reveal Progressive Arteriolar Thickening as a Predictor of Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Life 2025, 15, 1635. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101635

AMA Style

Rodríguez-Espinosa D, Hermida E, Leal-Cúpich A, García A, Larque AB, Cuadrado-Payán E, Guillén-Olmos E, Moncada M, Ventura-Aguiar P, Cucchiari D, et al. Protocol Biopsies Reveal Progressive Arteriolar Thickening as a Predictor of Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Life. 2025; 15(10):1635. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101635

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodríguez-Espinosa, Diana, Evelyn Hermida, Agustín Leal-Cúpich, Adriana García, Ana Belén Larque, Elena Cuadrado-Payán, Elena Guillén-Olmos, Marina Moncada, Pedro Ventura-Aguiar, David Cucchiari, and et al. 2025. "Protocol Biopsies Reveal Progressive Arteriolar Thickening as a Predictor of Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients" Life 15, no. 10: 1635. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101635

APA Style

Rodríguez-Espinosa, D., Hermida, E., Leal-Cúpich, A., García, A., Larque, A. B., Cuadrado-Payán, E., Guillén-Olmos, E., Moncada, M., Ventura-Aguiar, P., Cucchiari, D., Esforzado, N., Revuelta, I., Diekmann, F., Torregrosa, J. V., & Broseta, J. J. (2025). Protocol Biopsies Reveal Progressive Arteriolar Thickening as a Predictor of Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Life, 15(10), 1635. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101635

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop