Next Article in Journal
Metagenomic Analysis of Garden Soil-Derived Microbial Consortia and Unveiling Their Metabolic Potential in Mitigating Toxic Hexavalent Chromium
Next Article in Special Issue
Software-Based Assessment of Well-Aerated Lung at CT for Quantification of Predicted Pulmonary Function in Resected NSCLC
Previous Article in Journal
Synergistic Effect of Polysaccharides from Chamomile Tea with Nitazoxanide Increases Treatment Efficacy against Giardia intestinalis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/life12122092
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Baseline Ang-2 Serum Levels as a Predictive Factor for Survival in NSCLC and SCLC

by
Asimina Nikolakopoulou
1,†,
Dimitris Tsakogiannis
2,†,
Flora Zagouri
3,
Eleni Zografos
3,
Lamprini Tzioga
2,
Grigorios Stratakos
1,
Nikolaos Koulouris
1,
Konstantinos Syrigos
4 and
Garyfalia Bletsa
2,*
1
1st Department of Respiratory Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
Research Center, Hellenic Anticancer Institute, 10680 Athens, Greece
3
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 11528 Athens, Greece
4
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Life 2022, 12(12), 2092; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122092
Submission received: 17 October 2022 / Revised: 29 November 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgical Treatment and Outcomes of Lung Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) has been implicated in the development of several types of cancer, including lung malignancy. In the present study, we examined the impact of Ang-2 serum concentration on the development, dissemination, and 5-year overall survival of NSCLC and SCLC. A total of 99 patients with lung cancer were tested. The OS of NSCLC and SCLC patients was estimated using Kaplan–Meier curves and compared through log-rank test. The median serum level of Ang-2 at baseline in both NSCLC and SCLC patients was significantly higher than that of controls (p < 0.0001). The Ang-2 serum concentration was not related to metastasis, neither in NSCLC nor in SCLC cases. The OS was found to be significantly shorter for stage IIIβ NSCLC patients with a high baseline Ang-2 serum concentration (p = 0.012), while Cox regression analysis showed that Ang-2 is a significant independent factor for poor prognosis for stage IIIβ NSCLC (hazard ratio = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.05–8.40, p = 0.04). The concentration of Ang-2 has no impact on the prognosis of SCLC. Ang-2 could be considered as a significant molecular marker that enables the prediction of NSCLC and SCLC development, and is involved in the poor prognosis of stage IIIβ NSCLC.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is a rapidly evolving type of malignancy, accounting for more than 1.5 million cancer associated deaths worldwide [1,2]. With regards to the male population, it is the most frequent type of cancer followed by prostate and colorectal cancer, while among women rates after breast and colorectal cancer [1,3]. Lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease in terms of clinical presentation and histology. According to the cytological features of tumor cells, lung cancer is classified into two main histological groups, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (15%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (85%), that confer different growth, metastasis, and treatment motifs [4,5].
Angiogenesis is the physiological procedure by which new blood vessels and capillaries are generated from pre-existing vasculature during wound healing and embryonic development, while it is considered as the key event for the development of several types of cancer, including lung cancer [6,7,8,9]. Angiogenesis is regulated by a complicated balance of proangiogenic and antiagiogenic factors. The most well-known angiogenic factors are vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and Angiopoietins [10,11]. In humans, Angiopoietins comprise a small group of three secreted glycoproteins named as Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), and Angiopoietin-4 (Ang-4) (the mouse ortholog is named as Ang-3), which are ligands of the Tie-2 tyrosine kinase receptor [11]. The role of angiopoietins in lung cancer development has gained increased popularity, whereas the vast majority of studies have focused on the relationship of Ang-2 with the development of NSCLC [11]. Nevertheless, the impact of Ang-2 on SCLC development remains rather vague. Nowadays, it is known that serum levels of Ang-2 are involved in primary lung cancer growth, tumor angiogenenis, lyphangiogenesis, advanced stages of NSCLC, and metastasis [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Moreover, it is significant to underline that surgery is found to be implicated in alterations in the Ang-2 plasma levels of NSCLC patients as well. In particular, it has been observed that postoperative patients exhibit higher Ang-2 plasma levels in association with their preoperative levels [22,23]. In addition, more invasive surgical methods appear to influence Ang-2 levels in patients with early-stage NSCLC [24].
In recent years, a significant interest has emerged in the prognostic efficacy of Ang-2 in lung cancer. In particular, Park et al. (2007) [16] first reported that NSCLC patients with low serum levels of Ang-2 exhibited a better overall survival than those with higher Ang-2 levels. However, numerous research analyses were followed in order to examine the prognostic value of Ang-2 in NSCLC cases, suggesting that Ang-2 is a considerable marker of poor prognosis of NSCLC [14,25,26,27,28]. On the other hand, little is known concerning the role of Ang-2 in the prognosis of SCLC [17,18].
To this end, the present study focused on the determination of the circulating levels of Ang-2 in lung cancer patients in order to evaluate the prognostic role of Ang-2 in NSCLC and SCLC. Moreover, we examined whether Ang-2 serum concentration differs between distinct lung cancer subtypes as well as between different clinicopathological characteristics including age, gender, smoke, and metastasis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patients

The study enrolled 99 patients (74 males and 25 females) diagnosed with lung cancer between January 2014 and January 2019 at the Thoracic Diseases General Hospital of Athens ‘Sotiria’. In addition, a total of 55 healthy individuals were also recruited in the retrospective analysis. The mean age of the patients and control group was 64.7 ± 8.9 and 52.8 ± 13.4 years, respectively. Information on patients including age, smoke, gender, type of lung cancer, and metastasis was retrieved from the database of our hospital. In particular, 26 lung cancer patients were diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), while 73 patients were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study population in both NSCLC and SCLC cases consisted of inoperable patients with locally advanced (Stage IIIβ) and patients with distant metastasis (Stage IV). Patients included in the study were not treated with radiotherapy and did not receive any anticancer therapy prior to the baseline measurement of Ang-2. The patients enrolled in the study were treated based on the existing guidelines at the time of the study. In particular, a total of 57 (57/73) NSCLC and 26 (26/73) SCLC patients received platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in three week cycles up to six cycles, while 16 (16/73) NSCLC patients were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) 15 mg/kg. Follow-up information regarding the cause of death of the examined patients was obtained through a review of medical records. All patients signed an informed consent form and the study was approved from the research committee of the hospital (approval number 15146/14-07-2017).

2.2. Sample Preparation and Ang-2 Level Measurement

Blood samples from lung cancer patients and healthy controls were collected between 12:00 a.m. and 14:00 p.m. Sampling was performed directly into serum vacuum tubes with a clot activator. Tubes remained at room temperature for 20–30 min to enable blood clotting and they were centrifuged at 3000× g rpm for 15 min at 8 °C. Immediately after centrifugation, the serum samples were stored at −80 °C until use. Serum samples were collected from lung cancer patients before initiation of treatment and after the third cycle of chemotherapy. Serum samples were tested for Ang-2 concentration at the baseline. The measurement of Ang-2 serum levels was carried out in duplicates through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using the Human Angiopoietin—2 Quantikine® ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The acquired fluorescence data were analyzed using Multiscan™ FC Microplate Photometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The Ang-2 levels were classified as low or high for each patient using the median value as cut-off. The association of Ang-2 serum levels with the development of lung cancer as well as with the clinicopathological parameters, including age, gender, smoke, metastasis, and lung cancer type, were estimated using the Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison post hoc test. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the serum level of Ang-2 were calculated using ROC (receiving operator characteristic) analysis. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and differences in survival rates were examined using the logrank test. The prognostic significance of each variable to overall survival was estimated through the Cox regression model. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare Ang-2 levels at the third cycle of chemotherapy. Data were analyzed using the SPSS (version 23) statistic software package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p-values were considered as statistically significant bellow the 0.05 cut-off level.

3. Results

3.1. Association of Ang-2 Serum Levels with the Development of Lung Cancer

Serum levels of Ang-2 were measured in a total of 99 patients along with 55 healthy individuals. The median serum level of Ang-2 at baseline was 3493 pg/mL for lung cancer patients and was significantly higher than that of controls (median concentration; 3493 pg/mL vs. 2148 pg/mL, p < 0.0001, Table 1, Figure 1). The most optimal cut-off value of Ang-2 serum concentration was 2547 pg/mL, offering a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 71% for distinguishing lung cancer patients from healthy controls. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.779 (95% CI: 0.707–0.852, p < 0.0001).
The association of Ang-2 serum levels with the different clinicopathological characteristics of patients was evaluated. No significant differences in Ang-2 levels were reported among the different patient characteristics, including age (p = 0.91), smoke (p = 0.16), gender (p = 0.61), and lung cancer type (p = 0.91) (Table 1). Although patients with metastatic disease had higher Ang-2 serum levels when compared with patients with no metastasis, this association failed to reach the limits of statistical significance (median concentration; 3538 pg/mL vs. 3318 pg/mL, p = 0.23, Table 1). The correlation of Ang-2 serum concentration with the development of lung cancer was further investigated with respect to the two different histological groups (SCLC, NSCLC). Baseline serum levels of Ang-2 in both SCLC and NSCLC were significantly higher than that of the control group (SCLC: median concentration; 3479 pg/mL vs. 2148 pg/mL, p < 0.0001, NSCLC: median concentration; 3508 pg/mL vs. 2148 pg/mL, p < 0.0001, Table 2). Moreover, no significant association of Ang-2 levels was reported between Ang-2 levels and presence of metastasis, neither in SCLC nor in NSCLC patients.

3.2. Association of Baseline Ang-2 Serum Level with the 5-Year Overall Survival of NSCLC and SCLC

Kaplan–Meier curves and logrank test were conducted in order to examine the impact of baseline Ang-2 serum level on the overall survival of lung cancer patients diagnosed as stage IIIβ and IV, respectively. According to our results, Ang-2 baseline levels were not associated with overall survival in stage IIIβ lung cancer patients (Figure 2A). No significant association was observed in stage IV lung cancer patients as well (Figure 2B).
The effect of baseline Ang-2 level in the survival of patients was also evaluated per histological type of lung cancer (SCLC, NSCLC). Considering stage IIIβ NSCLC, it was found that the median overall survival was significantly shorter for patients with a high baseline Ang-2 serum concentration. In particular, the median overall survival was 10 months in stage IIIβ NSCLC patients with a high Ang-2 baseline level (95% CI: 1.8–18.2), while the median overall survival was 46 months in stage IIIβ NSCLC patients with a low Ang-2 baseline concentration (95% CI: 9.5–82.5) (p = 0.012, Figure 3A). Multivariate Cox regression model further revealed that the high baseline Ang-2 concentration is an independent predictor of survival for patients with stage IIIβ NSCLC (hazard ratio = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.05–8.40, p = 0.04, Table 3). With regards to stage IV NSCLC patients, median overall survival was 6 months in patients with a high Ang-2 baseline level (95% CI: 2.8–9.2), whereas median overall survival was 10 months in patients with a low Ang-2 baseline level (95% CI: 4.0–15.9). However, these results were not considered as statistically significant (p = ns, Figure 3B). Moreover, Ang-2 baseline levels were not associated with overall survival in SCLC patients, neither of stage IIIβ nor of stage IV (Figure 4).

3.3. Ang-2 Serum Concentration before Treatment and after the Third Cycle of Chemotherapy

Differences between the Ang-2 concentration before treatment and after the third cycle of chemotherapy were also evaluated in cases where blood samples were available. In particular, the median Ang-2 level in NSCLC patients (n = 16) who received platin-based chemotherapy in combination with anti-VEGF factor was significantly higher after the third cycle of chemotherapy when compared with the Ang-2 serum level at admission (median concentration; 4285 pg/mL vs. 2734 pg/mL, Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 0.044, Figure 5A). In addition, NSCLC patients who received only platin-based chemotherapy (n = 23) provided no significant differences at Ang-2 serum levels after the third cycle of chemotherapy (median concentration; 3188 pg/mL vs. 3350 pg/mL, Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 0.58, Figure 5B). Finally, SCLC patients (n = 13) treated with platin-based chemotherapy showed no significant alterations in Ang-2 serum level after the third cycle of chemotherapy as well (median concentration; 3115 pg/mL vs. 3493 pg/mL, Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 0.54, Figure 5B).

4. Discussion

Ang-2 is preferentially expressed in lung cancer tissues compared with normal tissue and is implicated in the angiogenic stimulation in tumorigenesis [11,29]. Nowadays, the research interest has focused on the prognostic value of Ang-2 in lung cancer, while it has been proposed that Ang-2 can be regarded as an indicator of poor prognosis of NSCLC [16]. Moreover, a limited number of studies have evaluated the role of Ang-2 in SCLC cases [17,18]. In the present analysis, increased serum levels of Ang-2 were detected in lung cancer patients when compared with healthy controls, while higher baseline serum levels of Ang-2 were also identified in NSCLC and SCLC histological groups compared with healthy individuals, thus supporting the previous findings [16,17,18,25,26,27] (Table 2). No significant association of Ang-2 serum levels was identified when compared with the age, smoke, and gender of lung cancer patients (NSCLC, SCLC). It is of note that Ang-2 serum levels were not associated with metastasis in both SCLC and NSCLC incidences. With respect to NSCLC, Park et al. (2007) [16] first reported that high serum levels of Ang-2 are associated with metastasis in NSCLC patients. However, more recent analyses failed to confirm any significant association between serum Ang-2 and metastasis in NSCLC patients, which are in line with our results [14,25,30]. The impact of Ang-2 on metastasis in SCLC patients has not been investigated yet [17,18]. However, in the present analysis, we found no significant difference in Ang-2 serum levels between SCLC metastatic and non-metastatic cases, raising a concern about the prognostic significance of Ang-2 in the overall population.
Considering the prognostic role of Ang-2, numerous research studies have proved that high serum levels of Ang-2 are associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC [14,16,25,26,27]. On the other hand, a previous analysis by Naumnic et al. (2009) [30] demonstrated that the measurement of Ang-2, Ang-1, and Tie-2 serum concentration has no clinical impact on the prognosis of NSCLC. Our results indicate that higher baseline serum levels of Ang-2 are associated with poor prognosis in stage IIIβ NSCLC, while high baseline Ang-2 serum concentration is an independent factor of poor prognosis in stage IIIβ NSCLC (hazard ratio = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.05–8.40, p = 0.04, Table 3) [14,16,26,27]. Interestingly, no considerable association was detected between the serum levels of Ang-2 and the overall survival of stage IV NSCLC. In addition, we found that the serum levels of Ang-2 were not associated with the survival of SCLC patients, neither of stage IIIβ nor of stage IV. These results contradict previous findings that support that Ang-2 is a significant marker of poor prognosis in SCLC [17,18]. One possible explanation of our results could be the small number of SCLC patients examined in the present analysis. Thus, more analyses are warranted to better assess the prognostic capacity of Ang-2 in SCLC.
Finally, we investigated the alteration of Ang-2 serum levels after the third cycle of chemotherapy whenever patient serum samples were available. In particular, NSCLC patients were classified into two categories, containing those who received platinum-based chemotherapy and those who were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with an anti-VEGF factor. Ang-2 serum levels did not differ significantly after the third cycle of treatment compared with serum levels at admission in NSCLC and SCLC patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy (p = ns, Figure 5B) [17,18]. On the other hand, a considerable increase in Ang-2 concentration was detected in 16 NSCLC at the third cycle of treatment who received platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with the anti-VEGF treatment (p = 0.044, Figure 5A). Previous analyses have observed an increased Ang-2 expression as an escape mechanism to anti-VEGF therapy [31,32,33,34]. In clinical studies concerning glioblastoma, Ang-2 levels are reduced provisionally following inhibition of the VEGF pathway and eventually increased as tumors are turned into resistant to therapy [32]. Accordingly, vague resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy by VEGFA signaling blockade was found to be responsible for the upregulation of Ang-2 in late stage pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [35]. Notably, it has been established that resistance to anti-VEGF treatment may include the adaptive enforcement of Ang-2/Tie2 signaling pathway and stimulate a reversal by Ang-2 neutralization in cases of pathological neovascularisation [36,37,38]. Taking all these data into consideration, it was concluded that the increase in Ang-2 in 16 NSCLC patients after three cycles of treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-VEGF might be related to the role of Ang-2 in resistance to anti-VEGF therapy.
It has been suggested that treatment with anti-VEGF factors improves the OS of NSCLC patients. The addition of avastin to atezolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy offered a prolongation of OS from 14.7 months to 19.2 months (IMpower 150 trial), which led to the incorporation of anti-VEGF treatment in the first-line setting of NSCLC [39]. Independently of baseline Ang-2 levels, our results indicated that the incorporation of anti-VEGF factor into anticancer treatment prolonged OS, but it was not statistically significant affected. Our observations may be due to the small number of incidences that we examined in the present analysis. Therefore, more studies are required to draw more accurate conclusions, whereas the implication of Ang-2 as an escape mechanism to anti-VEGF therapy in NSCLC remains to be further discussed in the future.
The fact that the Ang-2 serum concentrations remain high even after the third cycle of chemotherapy either in NSCLC or SCLC cases may indicate that the respective angiogenic factor could serve as a considerable therapeutic target for lung cancer patients. Interestingly, the Ang-2 blockade decreases angiogenesis and inhibits metastasis in mouse tumor models, while the Ang-2 blockade restrains tumor growth and decelerates tumor resistance to anti-VEGFA therapy in various types of cancer when administrated in combination with anti-VEGF drugs [35,40,41,42,43,44]. Moreover, it has been proved that concurrent Ang-2 and VEGF blockade confers significant therapeutic benefits compared with the blockade of single agent in tumor models concerning metastatic breast cancer, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, and melanoma [35,45]. Taking all these data into consideration, it is proposed that Ang-2 might be an interesting target for future therapeutic approaches in lung cancer, while the therapeutic benefit of simultaneous blockade of Ang-2 and VEGF in lung cancer remains to be further clarified. In relation to SCLC, three cycles of chemotherapy resulted in an insignificant decrease in serum Ang-2 levels, which might be an indicator of stabilization of the disease. Additional samples at different time points could be useful in order to specify the time of relapse.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the present analysis revealed that Ang-2 is a significant marker of the development of NSCLC and SCLC. Moreover, our results indicate that the measurement of Ang-2 serum concentration has a considerable clinical role in the prognosis of stage IIIβ NSCLC, although this phenomenon was not observed in SCLC. The incorporation of Ang-2 in the diagnosis of stage IIIβ NSCLC could significantly improve the precise prognosis of lung cancer, while Ang-2 blockade could serve as a potential future therapeutic approach for lung cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.B., F.Z. and K.S.; methodology, D.T., A.N., L.T. and E.Z.; formal analysis, D.T., G.B. and A.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N., D.T. and G.B.; writing—review and editing, D.T., G.B., F.Z., K.S., G.S. and N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved from Ethic committee and Scientific Council of Thoracic Diseases General Hospital Sotiria (Approval Code: 15146, Approval Date: 14 July 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are included in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration; Fitzmaurice, C.; Dicker, D.; Pain, A.; Hamavid, H.; Moradi-Lakeh, M.; MacIntyre, M.F.; Allen, C.; Hansen, G.; Woodbrook, R.; et al. The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 505–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Torre, L.A.; Siegel, R.L.; Jemal, A. Lung Cancer Statistics. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 893, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Govindan, R.; Page, N.; Morgensztern, D.; Read, W.; Tierney, R.; Vlahiotis, A.; Spitznagel, E.L.; Piccirillo, J. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: Analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 4539–4544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Molina, J.R.; Yang, P.; Cassivi, S.D.; Schild, S.E.; Adjei, A.A. Non-small cell lung cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2008, 83, 584–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rajabi, M.; Mousa, S.A. The Role of Angiogenesis in Cancer Treatment. Biomedicines 2017, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Nishida, N.; Yano, H.; Nishida, T.; Kamura, T.; Kojiro, M. Angiogenesis in cancer. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2006, 2, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bacic, I.; Karlo, R.; Zadro, A.S.; Zadro, Z.; Skitarelic, N.; Antabak, A. Tumor angiogenesis as an important prognostic factor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (Stage IIIA). Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 2335–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Farzaneh Behelgardi, M.; Zahri, S.; Mashayekhi, F.; Mansouri, K.; Asghari, S.M. A peptide mimicking the binding sites of VEGF-A and VEGF-B inhibits VEGFR-1/-2 driven angiogenesis, tumor growth and metastasis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Shim, W.S.; Ho, I.A.; Wong, P.E. Angiopoietin: A TIE(d) balance in tumor angiogenesis. Mol. Cancer Res. 2007, 5, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsakogiannis, D.; Nikolakopoulou, A.; Zagouri, F.; Stratakos, G.; Syrigos, K.; Zografos, E.; Koulouris, N.; Bletsa, G. Update Overview of the Role of Angiopoietins in Lung Cancer. Medicina 2021, 57, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xuan, Z.X.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, S.J.; Wang, W.; Yu, J. Prognostic value of angiopoietin-2 in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 14, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, N.; Zhou, J.; Liu, L. The role of serum angiopoietin-2 levels in progression and prognosis of lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2017, 96, e8063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fawzy, A.; Gaafar, R.; Kasem, F.; Ali, S.S.; Elshafei, M.; Eldeib, M. Importance of serum levels of angiopoietin-2 and survivin biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Egypt. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2012, 24, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Park, J.H.; Choi, H.; Kim, Y.B.; Kim, Y.S.; Sheen, S.S.; Choi, J.H.; Lee, H.L.; Lee, K.S.; Chung, W.Y.; Lee, S.; et al. Serum angiopoietin-1 as a prognostic marker in resected early stage lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2009, 66, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Park, J.H.; Park, K.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Sheen, S.S.; Lee, K.S.; Lee, H.N.; Oh, Y.J.; Hwang, S.C. Serum angiopoietin-2 as a clinical marker for lung cancer. Chest 2007, 132, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Canadas, I.; Taus, A.; Villanueva, X.; Arpi, O.; Pijuan, L.; Rodriguez, Y.; Menendez, S.; Mojal, S.; Rojo, F.; Albanell, J.; et al. Angiopoietin-2 is a negative prognostic marker in small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2015, 90, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, C.L.; Ge, S.L.; Yang, N.; Zhang, J.R.; Tian, D.D. Elevated Serum Level of Angiopoietin-2 as a Potential Marker for Poor Prognosis in Small Cell Lung Cancer. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2015, 236, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Xu, C.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yan, J.; Yu, L. Serum Angiopoietin-2 as a Clinical Marker for Lung Cancer in Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodules. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2016, 46, 60–64. [Google Scholar]
  20. Naumnik, W.; Naumnik, B.; Niewiarowska, K.; Ossolinska, M.; Chyczewska, E. Angiogenic axis angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2/Tie-2 in non-small cell lung cancer: A bronchoalveolar lavage and serum study. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013, 788, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, Z.; Chen, J.; Yang, X.; Zheng, W.; Wang, L.; Fang, M.; Wu, M.; Yao, M.; Yao, D. Ang-2 promotes lung cancer metastasis by increasing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 12705–12717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhou, L.; Lan, H.; Zhou, Q.; Yue, J.; Liu, B. Plasma angiopoietin-2 is persistently elevated after non-small cell lung cancer surgery and stimulates angiogenesis in vitro. Medicine 2016, 95, e4493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kopczynska, E.; Dancewicz, M.; Kowalewski, J.; Makarewicz, R.; Kardymowicz, H.; Kaczmarczyk, A.; Tyrakowski, T. Time-dependent changes of plasma concentrations of angiopoietins, vascular endothelial growth factor, and soluble forms of their receptors in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients following surgical resection. ISRN Oncol. 2012, 2012, 638352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ng, C.S.; Wan, S.; Wong, R.H.; Ho, A.M.; Yim, A.P. Angiogenic response to major lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer with video-assisted thoracic surgical and open access. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 636754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Daly, S.; Kubasiak, J.C.; Rinewalt, D.; Pithadia, R.; Basu, S.; Fhied, C.; Lobato, G.C.; Seder, C.W.; Hong, E.; Warren, W.H.; et al. Circulating angiogenesis biomarkers are associated with disease progression in lung adenocarcinoma. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2014, 98, 1968–1975; discussion 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Coelho, A.L.; Araujo, A.M.; Gomes, M.P.; Catarino, R.J.; Andrade, E.B.; Lopes, A.M.; Medeiros, R.M. Combined Ang-2 and VEGF serum levels: Holding hands as a new integral biomarker in non-small-cell lung cancers. Future Oncol. 2015, 11, 3233–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Coelho, A.L.; Gomes, M.P.; Catarino, R.J.; Rolfo, C.; Medeiros, R.M.; Araujo, A.M. CSF-1 and Ang-2 serum levels—Prognostic and diagnostic partners in non-small cell lung cancer. ESMO Open 2018, 3, e000349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hu, W.; Tang, C.H.; Chen, H.T.; Zhao, J.; Jin, L.; Kang, L.; Wu, Y.; Ying, P.; Wang, C.Q.; Su, C.M. Correlations between angiopoietin-2 gene polymorphisms and lung cancer progression in a Chinese Han population. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 2935–2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Fagiani, E.; Christofori, G. Angiopoietins in angiogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2013, 328, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Naumnik, W.; Chyczewska, E.; Ossolinska, M. Serum levels of angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, and their receptor tie-2 in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer during chemotherapy. Cancer Investig. 2009, 27, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Angermann, R.; Rauchegger, T.; Nowosielski, Y.; Seifarth, C.; Egger, S.; Kralinger, M.T.; Kieselbach, G.F.; Zehetner, C. Systemic counterregulatory response of angiopoietin-2 after aflibercept therapy for nAMD: A potential escape mechanism. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021, 99, e869–e875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Peterson, T.E.; Kirkpatrick, N.D.; Huang, Y.; Farrar, C.T.; Marijt, K.A.; Kloepper, J.; Datta, M.; Amoozgar, Z.; Seano, G.; Jung, K.; et al. Dual inhibition of Ang-2 and VEGF receptors normalizes tumor vasculature and prolongs survival in glioblastoma by altering macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 4470–4475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Winkler, F.; Kozin, S.V.; Tong, R.T.; Chae, S.S.; Booth, M.F.; Garkavtsev, I.; Xu, L.; Hicklin, D.J.; Fukumura, D.; di Tomaso, E.; et al. Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: Role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell 2004, 6, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Batchelor, T.T.; Mulholland, P.; Neyns, B.; Nabors, L.B.; Campone, M.; Wick, A.; Mason, W.; Mikkelsen, T.; Phuphanich, S.; Ashby, L.S.; et al. Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 3212–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Rigamonti, N.; Kadioglu, E.; Keklikoglou, I.; Wyser Rmili, C.; Leow, C.C.; De Palma, M. Role of angiopoietin-2 in adaptive tumor resistance to VEGF signaling blockade. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 696–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Moon, W.S.; Rhyu, K.H.; Kang, M.J.; Lee, D.G.; Yu, H.C.; Yeum, J.H.; Koh, G.Y.; Tarnawski, A.S. Overexpression of VEGF and angiopoietin 2: A key to high vascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma? Mod. Pathol. 2003, 16, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wang, H.L.; Deng, C.S.; Lin, J.; Pan, D.Y.; Zou, Z.Y.; Zhou, X.Y. Expression of angiopoietin-2 is correlated with vascularization and tumor size in human colorectal adenocarcinoma. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2007, 213, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Labussiere, M.; Cheneau, C.; Prahst, C.; Gallego Perez-Larraya, J.; Farina, P.; Lombardi, G.; Mokhtari, K.; Rahimian, A.; Delattre, J.Y.; Eichmann, A.; et al. Angiopoietin-2 May Be Involved in the Resistance to Bevacizumab in Recurrent Glioblastoma. Cancer Investig. 2016, 34, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Socinski, M.A.; Nishio, M.; Jotte, R.M.; Cappuzzo, F.; Orlandi, F.; Stroyakovskiy, D.; Nogami, N.; Rodriguez-Abreu, D.; Moro-Sibilot, D.; Thomas, C.A.; et al. IMpower150 Final Overall Survival Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in First-Line Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2021, 16, 1909–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Scholz, A.; Harter, P.N.; Cremer, S.; Yalcin, B.H.; Gurnik, S.; Yamaji, M.; Di Tacchio, M.; Sommer, K.; Baumgarten, P.; Bahr, O.; et al. Endothelial cell-derived angiopoietin-2 is a therapeutic target in treatment-naive and bevacizumab-resistant glioblastoma. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016, 8, 39–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Daly, C.; Eichten, A.; Castanaro, C.; Pasnikowski, E.; Adler, A.; Lalani, A.S.; Papadopoulos, N.; Kyle, A.H.; Minchinton, A.I.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; et al. Angiopoietin-2 functions as a Tie2 agonist in tumor models, where it limits the effects of VEGF inhibition. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mazzieri, R.; Pucci, F.; Moi, D.; Zonari, E.; Ranghetti, A.; Berti, A.; Politi, L.S.; Gentner, B.; Brown, J.L.; Naldini, L.; et al. Targeting the ANG2/TIE2 axis inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by impairing angiogenesis and disabling rebounds of proangiogenic myeloid cells. Cancer Cell 2011, 19, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Holopainen, T.; Saharinen, P.; D’Amico, G.; Lampinen, A.; Eklund, L.; Sormunen, R.; Anisimov, A.; Zarkada, G.; Lohela, M.; Helotera, H.; et al. Effects of angiopoietin-2-blocking antibody on endothelial cell-cell junctions and lung metastasis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2012, 104, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Srivastava, K.; Hu, J.; Korn, C.; Savant, S.; Teichert, M.; Kapel, S.S.; Jugold, M.; Besemfelder, E.; Thomas, M.; Pasparakis, M.; et al. Postsurgical adjuvant tumor therapy by combining anti-angiopoietin-2 and metronomic chemotherapy limits metastatic growth. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 880–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Schmittnaegel, M.; Rigamonti, N.; Kadioglu, E.; Cassara, A.; Wyser Rmili, C.; Kiialainen, A.; Kienast, Y.; Mueller, H.J.; Ooi, C.H.; Laoui, D.; et al. Dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGFA inhibition elicits antitumor immunity that is enhanced by PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaak9670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 12 02092 g001 550
Figure 1. Ang-2 serum levels of healthy controls compared with the Ang-2 serum levels of patients with lung cancer.
Figure 1. Ang-2 serum levels of healthy controls compared with the Ang-2 serum levels of patients with lung cancer.
Life 12 02092 g001
Life 12 02092 g002 550
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival grouped by baseline serum Ang-2 levels. (A) Overall survival for stage ΙΙΙβ lung cancer patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline. (B) Overall survival for stage IV lung cancer patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival grouped by baseline serum Ang-2 levels. (A) Overall survival for stage ΙΙΙβ lung cancer patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline. (B) Overall survival for stage IV lung cancer patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline.
Life 12 02092 g002
Life 12 02092 g003 550
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival grouped by baseline serum Ang-2 levels. (A) Overall survival for stage ΙΙΙβ NSCLC patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline. (B) Overall survival for stage IV NSCLC patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival grouped by baseline serum Ang-2 levels. (A) Overall survival for stage ΙΙΙβ NSCLC patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline. (B) Overall survival for stage IV NSCLC patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline.
Life 12 02092 g003
Life 12 02092 g004 550
Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival grouped by baseline serum Ang-2 levels. (A) Overall survival for stage ΙΙΙβ SCLC patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline. (B) Overall survival for stage IV SCLC patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline.
Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival grouped by baseline serum Ang-2 levels. (A) Overall survival for stage ΙΙΙβ SCLC patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline. (B) Overall survival for stage IV SCLC patients with high or low serum Ang-2 at baseline.
Life 12 02092 g004
Life 12 02092 g005 550
Figure 5. Ang-2 serum levels of patients at the third cycle of chemotherapy. (A) Ang-2 serum levels of NSCLC patients who received PBC in combination with anti-VEGF before treatment and after the third cycle of chemotherapy. (B) Ang-2 serum levels of SCLC patients who received PBC before treatment and after the third cycle of chemotherapy.
Figure 5. Ang-2 serum levels of patients at the third cycle of chemotherapy. (A) Ang-2 serum levels of NSCLC patients who received PBC in combination with anti-VEGF before treatment and after the third cycle of chemotherapy. (B) Ang-2 serum levels of SCLC patients who received PBC before treatment and after the third cycle of chemotherapy.
Life 12 02092 g005
Table
Table 1. Association of Ang-2 baseline level with the different clinicopathological characteristics of patients including age, smoke, gender, metastasis, and histological type. p-values were considered as statistically significant at the 0.05 cut-off level.
Table 1. Association of Ang-2 baseline level with the different clinicopathological characteristics of patients including age, smoke, gender, metastasis, and histological type. p-values were considered as statistically significant at the 0.05 cut-off level.
Ang-2 Median (pg/mL)p-Values
Patients (n = 99)3459
Control (n = 55)2148<0.0001
Patients
Age
≥65 (n = 50)3520
<65 (n = 49)34790.91
Smoke
Yes (n = 62)3643
No (n = 37)33380.16
Gender
Males (n = 74)3493
Females (n = 25)35260.61
Metastasis
Metastasis (n = 64)3538
No Metastasis (n = 35)33180.23
Lung cancer type
NSCLC (n = 73)3508
SCLC (n = 26)34790.91
Table
Table 2. Association of Ang-2 baseline level in SCLC and NSCLC incidences with age, smoke, gender, and metastasis. p-values were regarded as statistically significant at the 0.05 cut-off level.
Table 2. Association of Ang-2 baseline level in SCLC and NSCLC incidences with age, smoke, gender, and metastasis. p-values were regarded as statistically significant at the 0.05 cut-off level.
SCLC Ang-2 Median (pg/mL)p-ValuesNSCLC Ang-2 Median (pg/mL)p-Values
Patients (n = 26)3479 Patients (n = 73)3508
Control (n = 55)2148<0.0001Control (n = 55)2148<0.0001
PatientsPatients
Age Age
≥65 (n = 13)3552 ≥65 (n = 44)3573
<65 (n = 13)26830.64<65 (n = 29)33500.96
Smoke Smoke
Yes (n = 20)3434 Yes (n = 43)3628
No (n = 6)36780.8No (n = 30)31610.24
Gender Gender
Males (n = 19)3493 Males (n = 55)3458
Females (n = 7)26830.4Females (n = 18)35380.9
Metastasis Metastasis
Metastasis (n = 19)3891 Metastasis (n = 45)3526
No Metastasis (n = 7)26830.11No Metastasis (n = 28)33500.61
Table
Table 3. Multivariable analysis of the prognostic roles for clinicopathological parameters in patients diagnosed with stage IIIβ NSCLC.
Table 3. Multivariable analysis of the prognostic roles for clinicopathological parameters in patients diagnosed with stage IIIβ NSCLC.
ParametersHazard RatioLow LimitUpper Limitp-Value
Ang-22.971.058.400.04
Age 0.670.212.140.50
Smoke0.960.342.710.94
Gender0.760.222.690.68
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikolakopoulou, A.; Tsakogiannis, D.; Zagouri, F.; Zografos, E.; Tzioga, L.; Stratakos, G.; Koulouris, N.; Syrigos, K.; Bletsa, G. Baseline Ang-2 Serum Levels as a Predictive Factor for Survival in NSCLC and SCLC. Life 2022, 12, 2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122092

AMA Style

Nikolakopoulou A, Tsakogiannis D, Zagouri F, Zografos E, Tzioga L, Stratakos G, Koulouris N, Syrigos K, Bletsa G. Baseline Ang-2 Serum Levels as a Predictive Factor for Survival in NSCLC and SCLC. Life. 2022; 12(12):2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikolakopoulou, Asimina, Dimitris Tsakogiannis, Flora Zagouri, Eleni Zografos, Lamprini Tzioga, Grigorios Stratakos, Nikolaos Koulouris, Konstantinos Syrigos, and Garyfalia Bletsa. 2022. "Baseline Ang-2 Serum Levels as a Predictive Factor for Survival in NSCLC and SCLC" Life 12, no. 12: 2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122092

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop