Next Article in Journal
Categorization of the Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye by a Cut-Off Criterion of TMH Measured with Tearscope
Previous Article in Journal
Functional Characterization of the Ryanodine Receptor Gene in Diaphorina citri
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suilyin Disrupts the Blood–Brain Barrier by Activating Group III Secretory Phospholipase A2
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/life12122006
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bringing Antimicrobial Strategies to a New Level: The Quorum Sensing System as a Target to Control Streptococcus suis

by
Bingqian Xue
1,2,†,
Yamin Shen
1,2,†,
Jing Zuo
1,2,
Dong Song
1,2,
Qingying Fan
1,2,
Xiaoling Zhang
1,2,
Li Yi
2,3,* and
Yang Wang
1,2,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China
2
Key Laboratory of Molecular Pathogen and Immunology of Animal of Luoyang, Luoyang 471000, China
3
College of Life Science, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Life 2022, 12(12), 2006; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122006
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 27 November 2022 / Published: 1 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Pathogenesis and Controlling of Streptococcus suis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Streptococcus suis (S. suis) is an important zoonotic pathogen. It mainly uses quorum sensing (QS) to adapt to complex and changeable environments. QS is a universal cell-to-cell communication system that has been widely studied for its physiological functions, including the regulation of bacterial adhesion, virulence, and biofilm formation. Quorum sensing inhibitors (QSIs) are highly effective at interfering with the QS system and bacteria have trouble developing resistance to them. We review the current research status of the S. suis LuxS/AI-2 QS system and QSIs. Studies showed that by inhibiting the formation of AI-2, targeting the LuxS protein, inhibiting the expression of luxs gene can control the LuxS/AI-2 QS system of S. suis. Other potential QSIs targets are summarized, which may be preventing and treating S. suis infections, including AI-2 production, transmission, LuxS protein, blockage of AI-2 binding to receptors, AI-2-mediated QS. Since antibiotics are becoming increasingly ineffective due to the emergence of resistant bacteria, including S. suis, it is thus critical to find new antibacterial drugs with different mechanisms of action. QSIs provide hope for the development of such drugs.

1. Introduction

Quorum sensing (QS) is an intercellular communication system used by bacteria to regulate and control many important survival processes. Bacteria transfer signal molecules to each other to regulate their behavior, including virulence factor production, biofilm formation, and gene regulation [1], in a cell density-dependent manner through the QS system [2]. The QS system is divided into four types due to different signal molecules. The QS system mediated by N-Acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs) is also called the AI-1 QS system. It is regulated by the LuxI/LuxR gene and mainly exists in Gram negative bacteria [3]. The QS system of Gram positive bacteria is mediated by autoinducing peptides (AIP). Bacteria require specialized proteins to transport AIP inwards and outwards [4]. The QS system mediated by Autoinducer-2 (AI-2) and LuxS protein is also called the LuxS/AI-2 QS system [5]. It is the fourth kind of QS system belonging to the bacterial interspecific communication. The interspecific QS system is the AI-3 QS system, which is mediated by adrenaline and noradrenaline [5].
Streptococcus suis (S. suis) is a Gram-positive bacterium and an emerging zoonotic agent. Pig tonsils and the upper respiratory tract are major reservoir niches for S. suis. It can cause meningitis, septicemia, pneumonia, arthritis, or sudden death in pigs [6]. The production of virulence factors and the formation of biofilms are under the control of QS, and S. suis is no exception [7]. Quorum sensing inhibitors (QSIs) target QS systems; they rely on the inhibition of the communication and virulence factors rather than on killing or inhibiting the growth of the microorganisms [8]. Many studies focus on the QSIs of the LuxS/AI-2 QS system. Although there are many mechanisms that have not been thoroughly studied, the main targets have been discovered, including the inhibition of LuxS protein activity, AI-2 transmission, and luxS gene expression [9,10]. Compared with traditional antibiotics, interfering with QS systems is a novel means to combat S. suis, meaning that it is much easier for the human to resist drug resistance. This review summarizes the bacterial LuxS/AI-2 QS system and the QSI for S. suis. According to several ways of inhibiting AI-2, some potential strategies of inhibiting S. suis are proposed. It is critical to find new antibacterial drugs with different mechanisms of action.

2. LuxS/AI-2 QS System

In a microbial community, bacteria interact with their neighbors of the same or different species. They live in symbiosis and communicate with each other using signal molecules. In general, bacteria sense chemical signaling molecules and regulate gene expression through the QS system mediated by AI-2 and LuxS, which enables bacterial communities to interact and adapt [11]. LuxS, as a key enzyme in the methylation cycle, can catalyze S-ribosylhomocysteine (SRH) to form homocysteine. In the catalytic process, a precursor molecule 4,5 dihydroxy 2,3 pentanedione (DPD) of the AI-2 molecule will be formed. DPD is decomposed into AI-2 through cyclization and rearrangement [12]. The number and behavior of bacteria are mainly mediated by an AI-2 interspecific QS system, which is widely distributed among different bacteria [13]. The importance of the LuxS/AI-2 QS system has been demonstrated by numerous studies, which showed that LuxS/AI-2 is involved in physiological processes such as biofilm formation, virulence, and antibiotic resistance [14,15]. Two receptor proteins that recognize AI-2 have been identified. One of these was found in Vibrio harveyi (V. harveyi), which regulates the behavior of the bacterium by binding a signaling molecule to the LuxP protein to detect AI-2 in the cytoplasm. The other is that AI-2 signal molecules in Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) recognize LsrB protein and regulate bacterial behaviors [16]. Figure 1 shows the molecule synthesis pathway for the AI-2 signal.

2.1. Streptococcus suis LuxS/AI-2 QS System

S. suis can synthesize functional AI-2 molecules while the group behavior of it is regulated by the LuxS/AI-2 QS system. This QS system can affect the growth, metabolism, biofilm formation, drug resistance, and virulence of S. suis [17]. Our research group has extensively studied the LuxS/AI-2 QS system of S. suis and found that all strains harbor the luxS gene and secrete and produce AI-2 signal molecules [18]. We cloned and expressed the LuxS protein, analyzed its three-dimensional fine structure (PDB index number 4XCH), and found that Zn2+ is the main component of the active center of the LuxS protein of S. suis [19]. Site-directed mutagenesis showed that two amino acid mutations have a major impact on substrate binding and enzyme catalytic ability. They also affect the production of AI-2 in S. suis and the formation of a biofilm. A lack of the luxS gene has many effects on the hemolytic activity, biofilm formation, adhesion, toxic force, toxic force genes, and inflammatory factors of S. suis [20]. The luxS gene deletion strain of S. suis lost the ability to produce AI-2 signal molecules, while the overexpression strain did not increase AI-2 molecule levels. We also showed that LuxS/AI-2 has an effect on bacterial resistance to quinolones by affecting the SatAB efflux pump, upregulating the expression of tet (M), increasing the resistance of S. suis to tetracycline, and affecting bacterial resistance by regulating the formation of a biofilm [21].

2.2. LuxS/AI-2 QS System Participates in the Regulation of Bacterial Function

Although the LuxS/AI-2 QS system is widely present in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, the biological functions involved in regulation vary slightly among different bacteria. For example, V. harveyi mainly regulates bioluminescence and colony morphology. It is involved in the production and release of virulence factors in V. cholerae [22,23]. It is involved in biofilm formation and the expression of virulence factors in E. coli [24].
For most bacteria, the regulatory function of the LuxS/AI-2 QS system is mainly reflected in three aspects, including bacterial virulence, biofilm, and other functions [25]. Zhang et al. constructed the luxS deletion mutant and its complemented strain from Haemophilus parasuis (H. parasuis) serovar 2, and preliminarily investigated the effects of luxS gene on several virulence-associated properties. The comparison of ΔluxS with H. parasuis 2 and C-luxS strains revealed that the luxS gene was related to growth characteristic, stress response, QS, biofilm formation, adherence, and virulence-associated LD50 and tissue burdens of bacteria [26]. Sun constructed a luxS gene mutant strain to identify how LuxS/AI-2 affects pathogenicity. The results showed that the AI-2 activities of Edwardsiella piscicida (E. piscicida) were 56-fold higher than those in the ΔluxS strain, suggesting that the luxS gene promotes AI-2 production. Another outcome demonstrated that the deletion of the luxS gene in EIB202 reduced its ability for growth, mobility, biofilm formation and for the infection of zebrafish. Results indicate that the LuxS/AI-2 QS system in E. piscicida promotes its pathogenicity through an increase in a diverse array of physiological activities [27]. Lu found that luxS gene deletion could lead to the decreased virulence of Streptococus mitis biofilm, reduced biofilm synthesis, and a loose structure. The level of drug resistance of the luxS deletion strain to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline decreased. These results indicated that the LuxS/AI-2 QS system could not only affect the formation of Streptococcus biofilm, but also affect its drug resistance [28]. These studies show that the LuxS/AI-2 QS system is biologically important as it is involved in numerous physiological processes. Many researchers disrupt the cellular communication between bacteria at the QS system level.

3. Quorum Sensing Inhibitors in Streptococcus suis

QSIs are promising alternatives to antibiotics for treating bacterial infections. QSIs of S. suis are being studied for their ability to attenuate bacterial virulence, biofilm formation, and because bacteria may have more trouble developing resistance to them.
Many previous studies showed that by inhibiting the formation of AI-2, targeting the LuxS protein, inhibiting the expression of the luxS gene can control the LuxS/AI-2 QS system of S. suis. The synthesis of AI-2 in S. suis can be used as a research target to search for and develop many QSIs. Current research focuses on the inhibition of luxS gene expression and the inhibition of the AI-2 metabolic cycle. QSIs have a strong inhibitory effect on bacterial growth and some can be extracted from whole plants or parts of flowers, fruits, and roots. Emodin (1,2,8-trihydroxy-6-methylanthraquinone) is a natural compound extracted from the roots of rhubarb, which has anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-biofilm formation [10,29], and other properties. luxS is a key gene in the LuxS/AI-2 QS system. Emodin can decrease the levels of AI-2 signal molecules and reduce the formation of S. suis biofilms mainly by down-regulating luxS gene expression, thus inhibiting the catalytic activity of LuxS [10]. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), are secreted by the immune system and participate in the first line of defense. They have great potential to combat microbial infections by directly killing or inhibiting bacterial activity and/or by modulating the immune response of the host [30]. In the early stage of the study, our research group synthesized several antimicrobial peptides, including the S. suis QS system blocking peptide TTMHSIRTNRHN, which can inhibit AI-2 synthesis in S. suis in vitro [31]. The inhibitory polypeptide HSIRTGSKKPVPIIY, which has a significant antibacterial effect, is a new type of broad-spectrum antibacterial polypeptide that can inhibit the production of AI-2 by S. suis, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), E. coli, and other bacteria [32]. Treating S. suis with the synthetic antimicrobial peptides temprine-La (S)(T-La(S)), temprine-La (Fs) (T-La (Fs)), RGD-T-La(S), or RGD-T-La (Fs) down-regulates the FBPS, luxS, and GAPDH genes and significantly reduces the concentration of AI-2 [33]. Han developed a novel S. suis QSI that targets the LuxS protein using phage display technology. A peptide inhibitor (TNRHNPHHLHHV) was used to interact with the LuxS protein following three rounds of phage display panning [9]. This approach generates high affinity peptide inhibitors that can inhibit enzyme activity. High affinity peptide inhibitors provide a new avenue for the development of novel antibacterial drugs. Our research group discovered a natural product, paeoniflorin, which has the same active site as the luxS gene in S. suis and forms protein-ligand interactions with the key amino acid residues of the LuxS protein, significantly reducing AI-2 production [34]. In the present review, we summarize QSIs of S. suis (Table 1).

4. Potential Drug Target of LuxS/AI-2 QS System to Inhibit Streptococcus suis

4.1. Potential Drug Target: AI-2 Production

AI-2 controls virulence factors and virulence production in host models for various pathogens, including E. coli, Helicobacter pylori, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae). This suggests that virulence inhibitors targeting AI-2 signaling may have a relatively wide range.
In the process of the biosynthesis of autoinducers, 5′-Methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomo-cysteine nucleosidase (MTAN) generally performs a crucial role in maintaining homeostasis in bacteria [36]. MTAN catalyzes the depurination of 5’-methylthioadenosine (MTA) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) to generate 5′-methylthioribose (MTR) or S-ribosylhomocysteine (SRH), respectively. The inhibition of MTAN blocks the generation of SRH and reduces the generation of AI-2 signal molecules. The transformation of MTA is also blocked, resulting in the accumulation of MTA. PhT-ImmA is a series of QSIs that target MTAN enzymes and block the production of SAH in Streptococcus pneumoniae [36]. This decreases the rate of synthesis of AI-2. In addition, they found MT-DADMe-Immucillin-A, EtT-DADMe-Immucillin-A and BuT-DADMe-Immucillin-A, which are inhibitors of V. cholerae MTAN (VcMTAN). MT- and BuT-DADMe-Immucillin-A inhibited AI-2 production in E. coli O157:H7. BuT-DADMe-Immucillin-A inhibition of AI-2 production in both strains persisted for several generations and resulted in the reduction in biofilm formation. Consequently, MTAN inhibitors can suppress the biological synthesis of AI-2, thereby disrupting QS [37]. It has now become the main strategy for the development of new drugs for treating S. suis infections. Various AI-2 homologs can also significantly inhibit MTAN activity, interfere with AI-2 synthesis, and block the QS system [38]. For instance, 3-(Dibromomethyl) isobenzofuran-1 (3H)-ketone derivatives, which have a similar ring structure to AI-2, also have a significant inhibitory effect on AI-2 activity [39]. Furthermore, rutin [40], citral [41], furanocoumarin [42], and other plant extracts can also reduce the synthesis of AI-2, thus reducing biofilm formation. Decreasing the virulence of bacteria by inhibiting AI-2 synthesis reduces the likelihood that bacteria will develop drug resistance.

4.2. Potential Drug Target: AI-2 Transmission

The degradation of AI-2 interrupts bacterial communication and regulates bacterial invasiveness. The inhibition of its activity by natural products or chemical substances can block the transfer of AI-2 molecules. It has been reported that andrographolide, the main component of Andrographis, a genus of flowering plants in the family acanthaceae, can significantly reduce the AI-2 activity of E. coli in poultry [43], inhibit the transcription levels of QS regulatory genes, and reduce the expression of virulence genes. 2(5H)-Furanone can disrupt the QS system of Campylobacter jejuni and reduce the activity of AI-2 [44]. Chemicals can also interfere with AI-2 delivery. For example, AI-2 production by V. harveyi is reduced by 70% after treatments with high concentrations of α-isophthalic acid and by 10% after a treatment with N-benzylcinnamamide. Both of these chemicals can modulate physiological functions by interfering with bacterial AI-2 communication [45]. The AI-2 kinase LsrK in E. coli can phosphorylate AI-2 in vitro and, if LsrK-treated AI-2 is added to E. coli, the regulatory capacity of the QS system is significantly reduced [46]. To date, no natural or synthetic substances have been found that degrade AI-2 in S. suis. However, naturally stimulated enzymatic quenching of the QS system, which is a novel way to control bacterial physiological functions, could lead to the development of synthetic QSIs to quench the QS system of S. suis.

4.3. Potential Drug Target: LuxS Protein

LuxS is a mandatory enzyme in the biosynthesis of DPD and encloses in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. A class of SRH analogues has been shown to inhibit Bacillus subtilis proliferation by targeting the LuxS protein [47]. S-anhydroribosyl-L-homocysteine and S-homoribosyl-L-cysteine are SRH analogs with a significant inhibitory effect on LuxS protein activity [48]. The high-affinity inhibitor may open up new approaches to the development of therapeutic drugs. Meng experimented with LuxS inhibitors from natural products for Lactobacillus reuteri. The results showed that norathyriol, mangiferin, baicalein, and kaempferol had good binding ability to LuxS protein. It has been shown that mangiferin may be a potential inhibitor of the LuxS protein [49].

4.4. Potential Drug Target: Blockage of AI-2 Binding to Receptors

AI-2 signaling molecule analogues prevent signaling molecules from binding to receptors and have been developed in many laboratories around the world. Most are artificially modified competitive inhibitors of bacterial QS signal molecules based on the structure of natural signal molecules as templates [50]. Phenothiazines and other compounds may prevent receptors from recognizing signal molecules by interfering with the binding of AI-2 to the receptors [51]. Some substances can bind to receptors, occupying sites and acting as false signaling molecules. For example, N,N’-bisalkylimidazolium salt can compete with AI-2 for receptors, which greatly reduces the recognition rate [52]. In Vibrio species, LuxP is the AI-2 binding protein. Wang discovered a series of aromatic diols; they would form a boric acid complex and mimic the structural features of DPD-boric acid complex in binding with LuxP. In addition, 1-alkylated DPD analogs compete with phosphorylated AI-2 and directly target the QS system, preventing AI-2 from binding to the LsrR repressor, leading to the expression of the lsr repressor operon [53]. Although the AI-2 receptor in S. suis has not been identified, this suppression strategy opens up new avenues for the development of novel drugs.

4.5. Potential Drug Target: AI-2-Mediated QS

The search for and development of safe, non-toxic, active QSIs is a rapidly growing field of research. Many natural products found in plants, fruits, and vegetables also act on the QS systems of pathogens, including naringin [54] and coumarin [42]. Although natural QSIs have been reported in many studies, their inhibition rates are generally low. However, synthetic QSIs can overcome this limitation. A variety of synthetic aromatic sulfones can directly inhibit the QS system of V. harveyi [55]. Linoleic acid, palmitic acid, and other substances can also act on the QS system, inhibiting bacterial interspecific regulation and significantly preventing biofilm formation. Cinnamon essential oil can interfere with the AI-2-mediated QS system, increasing its susceptibility to antibiotics [56]. Apigenin and hexadecanoic acid can directly inhibit the QS system mediated by AI-2 signaling molecules [57]. DPD is a key compound in the AI-2-mediated QS pathway. Janda and co-workers have synthesized a series of DPD analogs, which are not only active against the QS of V.harveyi, but also are active against the AI-2 QS of S. typhimurium [58]. Another study reported that fimbrolide's natural product (5Z)-4-bromo-5-(bromomethylene)-3-butyl-2(5H)-furanone has been considered to be a potent antagonist of both the AHL and AI-2 system in several organisms [26,59,60]. In the present review, we summarize potential QSIs of S. suis (Table 2 and Table 3). See Figure 2 for the action mechanisms of QSIs.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

QS is defined as a cell-to-cell communication process that bacteria use to coordinate group behaviors [70]. The ability of QS to regulate cell-to-cell communication plays an important role in bacterial virulence and drug resistance. Researchers have focused a great deal of attention on the QS system with the aim of reducing bacterial virulence and developing new anti-infective therapies. S. suis is a pathogen that is a major cause of economic losses in the pig industry. This is why the goal of finding new treatments for bacterial infections has focused the attention of researchers on targeting QS and developing QSIs. There is growing evidence that QSIs act on QS systems through different pathways and that QSIs can efficiently regulate the physiological functions of bacteria. The QSI of S. suis is being studied. At present, the main ways are to inhibit the luxS gene, block the formation of AI-2, and interfere with the binding of signal molecules with the LuxS protein. This result will reduce the virulence of bacteria, biofilm formation, and it may be more difficult for bacteria to develop drug resistance. The intense interest in this field of research has led to the discovery of other types of QSIs, including bacteriocins and probiotic secretions [71]. There are, however, also some issues worth investigating in the study and application of QSIs. First, in many studies that describe the QSI activity of natural and synthetic compounds, most of this research is based on experiments with quorum sensing signal molecule reporter strains. However, there are uncertainties regarding some QSIs. The adverse effects of certain naturally occurring active substances on the host cannot be excluded. Thus, researchers should perform adequate control experiments and should carefully assess the toxicity of the compounds in the bacterial species they are working on, and their reliability in clinical applications must be confirmed [72,73]. However, the trial period is long and it is not practical to apply it to clinical use earlier. Second, QSIs affect bacteria not by inhibiting their growth, but by regulating their gene expression or bacterial behavior. In most studies, it is used as an antibacterial synergist to dissolve naturally extracted or artificially synthesized QSIs in solvent and act on bacteria [10]. However, there is no unified answer to how to use QSIs, which we explore next. Although some QSIs exhibit the problems described above, their ability to regulate bacterial functions cannot be ignored. More in-depth research on the QS system and QSIs are required to better prevent and treat bacterial diseases such as S. suis infections. It is believed that more natural, non-toxic and effective QSIs will be developed and put into production in the near future to make it an effective choice for controlling human, animal and plant pathogen contamination. It will also benefit agriculture, fisheries and other industries susceptible to microbial pollution, playing an irreplaceable role.

Author Contributions

Writing original draft preparation, B.X., Y.S. and Y.W.; writing review and editing, B.X., J.Z., D.S. and Q.F.; supervision, Y.W., L.Y. and X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32172852, 31902309) and the Excellent Youth Foundation of He nan Scientific Committee (222300420005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. O’Loughlin, C.; Miller, L.; Siryaporn, A.; Drescher, K.; Semmelhack, M.; Bassler, B. A quorum-sensing inhibitor blocks Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and biofilm formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17981–17986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yi, L.; Dong, X.; Grenier, D.; Wang, K.; Wang, Y. Research progress of bacterial quorum sensing receptors: Classification, structure, function and characteristics. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 763, 143031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Miller, M.B.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum Sensing in Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2001, 55, 165–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bouillaut, L.; Perchat, S.; Arold, S.; Zorrilla, S.; Slamti, L.; Henry, C.; Gohar, M.; Declerck, N.; Lereclus, D. Molecular basis for group-specific activation of the virulence regulator PlcR by PapR heptapeptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 3791–3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Pereira, C.; Thompson, J.; Xavier, K. AI-2-mediated signalling in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 156–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Haleis, A.; Alfa, M.; Gottschalk, M.; Bernard, K.; Manickam, K. Meningitis caused by Streptococcus suis serotype 14, North America. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 350–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, L.; Grenier, D.; Yi, L. The LuxS/AI-2 system of Streptococcus suis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 7231–7238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tonkin, M.; Khan, S.; Wani, M.Y.; Ahmad, A. Quorum Sensing-A Stratagem for Conquering Multi-Drug Resistant Pathogens. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2021, 27, 2835–2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Han, X.; Lu, C. Biological activity and identification of a peptide inhibitor of LuxS from Streptococcus suis serotype 2. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 294, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Yang, Y.B.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Huang, Q.Y.; Bai, J.W.; Chen, J.Q.; Chen, X.Y.; Li, Y.H. Emodin affects biofilm formation and expression of virulence factors in Streptococcus suis ATCC700794. Arch. Microbiol. 2015, 197, 1173–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Srivastava, D.; Waters, C.M. A Tangled Web: Regulatory Connections between Quorum Sensing and Cyclic Di-GMP. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 4485–4493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Xavier, K.B.; Bassler, B.L. Regulation of Uptake and Processing of the Quorum-Sensing Autoinducer AI-2 in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Thompson, J.A.; Oliveira, R.A.; Djukovic, A.; Ubeda, C.; Xavier, K.B. Manipulation of the quorum sensing signal AI-2 affects the antibiotic-treated gut microbiota. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 1861–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, Y.; Hao, L.; Ke, H.; Liang, Z.; Ma, J.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y. LuxS/AI-2 in Streptococcus agalactiae reveals a key role in acid tolerance and virulence. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 115, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ma, R.; Qiu, S.; Jiang, Q.; Sun, H.; Xue, T.; Cai, G.; Sun, B. AI-2 quorum sensing negatively regulates rbf expression and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 307, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Taga, M.E.; Semmelhack, J.L.; Bassler, B.L. The LuxS-dependent autoinducer AI-2 controls the expression of an ABC transporter that functions in AI-2 uptake in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 42, 777–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Grenier, D.; Yi, L. Regulatory Mechanisms of the LuxS/AI-2 System and Bacterial Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e01186-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wu, Z.; Zhu, X.; Lu, C. Functional analysis of luxS in Streptococcus suis reveals a key role in biofilm formation and virulence. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 152, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Yi, L.; Wang, S.; Fan, H.; Ding, C.; Mao, X.; Lu, C. Crystal Structure and Identification of Two Key Amino Acids Involved in AI-2 Production and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus suis LuxS. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, Y.; Yi, L.; Zhang, Z.; Fan, H.; Lu, C. Over expression of luxS Cannot Increase Autoinducer-2 Production, Only Affect the Growth and Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus suis. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 924276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Li, J.; Gong, S.; Dong, X.; Mao, C.; Yi, L. LuxS/AI-2 system is involved in fluoroquinolones susceptibility in Streptococcus suis through overexpression of efflux pump SatAB. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 233, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bassler, B.L.; Wright, M.; Showalter, R.E.; Silverman, M.R. Intercellular signalling in Vibrio harveyi: Sequence and function of genes regulating expression of luminescence. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 9, 773–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nealson, K.H.; Hastings, J.W. Bacterial bioluminescence: Its control and ecological significance. Microbiol. Rev. 1979, 43, 496–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kendall, M.M.; Rasko, D.A.; Sperandio, V. Global effects of the cell-to-cell signaling molecules autoinducer-2, autoinducer-3, and epinephrine in a luxS mutant of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 4875–4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Choudhary, S.; Schmidt-Dannert, C. Applications of quorum sensing in biotechnology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, 1267–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, B.; Ku, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, G.; Chen, F.; Zeng, W.; Li, J.; Zhu, L.; He, Q. The AI-2/luxS Quorum Sensing System Affects the Growth Characteristics, Biofilm Formation, and Virulence of Haemophilus parasuis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Luo, Q.; Huang, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, X. LuxS/AI-2 Quorum Sensing System in Edwardsiella piscicida promotes Biofilm Formation and Pathogenicity. Infect Immun. 2020, 88, e00907-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lu, X.; Weng, C.; Wang, J.; Liu, S.; Liu, Q.; Lin, S. Biofilm formation and antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus mitis in response to luxS/AI-2 signaling. Int. J. Stomatol. 2017, 44, 411–420. [Google Scholar]
  29. Han, Q. Screening and Effects on the Virulence Genes and LuxS of Chinese Herbal Extracts against Streptococcus suis Biofilm; Northeast Agricultural University: Harbin, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  30. Drayton, M.; Kizhakkedathu, J.N.; Straus, S.K. Towards Robust Delivery of Antimicrobial Peptides to Combat Bacterial Resistance. Molecules 2020, 25, 3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Yi, L.; Sun, L.; Liu, Y.; Wen, W.; Li, X.; Ding, K.; Li, J. A Kind of Streptococcus suis Density Sensing System Blocking Polypeptide and Its Application: China. China Patent CN106957353A, 27 February 2013. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, Y.; Yi, L.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C.; Li, H.; Lu, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Yu, Z.; Cheng, X. A Novel Polypeptide Capable of Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial and Its Application: China. China Patent CN102942617A, 18 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
  33. Han, X. Study on the Quorum Sensing of luxS/AI-2 of Streptococcus suis Serotype2; Northeast Agricultural University: Harbin, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, J.; Fan, Q.; Jin, M.; Mao, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Sun, L.; Grenier, D.; Yi, L.; Hou, X.; et al. Paeoniflorin reduce /AI-2 system-controlled biofilm formation and virulence in luxS. Virulence 2021, 12, 3062–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, B. Effect of Rhizoma Coptidis and Its Monomers on the LuxS and Virulence Genes against Streptococcus suis Biofilm; Northeast Agricultural University: Harbin, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gutierrez, J.A.; Crowder, T.; Rinaldo-Matthis, A.; Ho, M.C.; Almo, S.C.; Schramm, V.L. Transition state analogs of 5 ‘-methylthioadenosine nucleosidase disrupt quorum sensing. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Singh, V.; Shi, W.; Almo, S.C.; Evans, G.B.; Furneaux, R.H.; Tyler, P.C.; Painter, G.F.; Lenz, D.H.; Mee, S.; Zheng, R.; et al. Structure and inhibition of a quorum sensing target from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 12929–12941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Tedder, M.E.; Nie, Z.; Margosiak, S.; Chu, S.; Feher, V.A.; Almassy, R.; Appelt, K.; Yager, K.M. Structure-based design, synthesis, and antimicrobial activity of purine derived SAH/MTA nucleosidase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 14, 3165–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Park, J.S.; Ryu, E.J.; Li, L.; Choi, B.K.; Kim, B.M. New bicyclic brominated furanones as potent autoinducer-2 quorum-sensing inhibitors against bacterial biofilm formation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 137, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peng, L.Y.; Yuan, M.; Cui, Z.Q.; Wu, Z.M.; Yu, Z.J.; Song, K.; Tang, B.; Fu, B.D. Rutin inhibits quorum sensing, biofilm formation and virulence genes in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 119, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, H.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, W.; Yang, A.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, S.; Jianyu, S.U. Inhibitory effects of citral, cinnamaldehyde, and tea polyphenols on mixed biofilm formation by foodborne Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enteritidis. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 927–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Girennavar, B.; Cepeda, M.L.; Soni, K.A.; Vikram, A.; Patil, B.S. Grapefruit juice and its furocoumarin inhibits autoinducer signaling and biofilm formation in bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 125, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guo, X.; Zhang, L.Y.; Wu, S.C.; Xia, F.; Fu, Y.X.; Wu, Y.L.; Leng, C.Q.; Yi, P.F.; Shen, H.Q.; Wei, X.B. Andrographolide interferes quorum sensing to reduce cell damage caused by avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 174, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Castillo, S.; Heredia, N.; García, S. 2(5H)-Furanone, epigallocatechin gallate, and a citric-based disinfectant disturb quorum-sensing activity and reduce motility and biofilm formation of Campylobacter jejuni. Folia Microbiol. 2015, 60, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ni, N.; Li, M.; Wang, J.; Wang, B. Inhibitors and antagonists of bacterial quorum sensing. Med. Res. Rev. 2009, 29, 65–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Roy, V.; Fernandes, R.; Tsao, C.; Bentley, W. Cross species quorum quenching using a native AI-2 processing enzyme. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010, 5, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shen, G.; Rajan, R.; Zhu, J.; Bell, C.; Pei, D. Design and synthesis of substrate and intermediate analogue inhibitors of S-ribosylhomocysteinase. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3003–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Alfaro, J.; Zhang, T.; Wynn, D.; Karschner, E.; Zhou, Z. Synthesis of LuxS inhibitors targeting bacterial cell-cell communication. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3043–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Meng, F.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Q.; Yang, M.; Yang, Y.; Li, X.; Gu, W.; Yu, J. Virtual screening and in vitro experimental verification of LuxS inhibitors from natural products for Lactobacillus reuteri. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 147, 112521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sun, Q.; Liang, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, F. Research Progress on Bacterial Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Chem. Bioeng. 2016, 33, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ni, N.; Choudhary, G.; Li, M.; Wang, B. A new phenothiazine structural scaffold as inhibitors of bacterial quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 382, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yannick, D.E.; Mohamad, S.; Arnaud, C.; Laurent, S.; Yves, Q.; Yves, D.; Valérie, H.; Denis, F. N,N’-alkylated Imidazolium-derivatives act as quorum-sensing inhibitors targeting the Pectobacterium atrosepticum-induced symptoms on potato tubers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 19976–19986. [Google Scholar]
  53. Roy, V.; Smith, J.; Wang, J.; Stewart, J.; Bentley, W.; Sintim, H. Synthetic analogs tailor native AI-2 signaling across bacterial species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11141–11150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, Z.; Pan, Y.; Li, X.; Jie, J.; Zeng, M. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and anti-quorum sensing activities of pummelo peel flavonoid extract. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 109, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, M.; Ni, N.; Chou, H.; Lu, C.; Tai, P.; Wang, B. Structure-based discovery and experimental verification of novel AI-2 quorum sensing inhibitors against Vibrio harveyi. ChemMedChem 2008, 3, 1242–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhu, H.; Du, M.; Fox, L.; Zhu, M.J. Bactericidal effects of Cinnamon cassia oil against bovine mastitis bacterial pathogens. Food Control 2016, 66, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Srinivasan, R.; Santhakumari, S.; Ravi, A.V. In vitro antibiofilm efficacy of Piper betle against quorum sensing mediated biofilm formation of luminescent Vibrio harveyi. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 110, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lowery, C.A.; Abe, T.; Park, J.; Eubanks, L.M.; Sawada, D.; Kaufmann, G.F.; Janda, K.D. Revisiting AI-2 Quorum Sensing Inhibitors: Direct Comparison of Alkyl-DPD Analogues and a Natural Product Fimbrolide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ren, D.; Zuo, R.; Gonzalez Barrios, A.F.; Bedzyk, L.A.; Eldridge, G.R.; Pasmore, M.E.; Wood, T.K. Differential gene expression for investigation of Escherichia coli biofilm inhibition by plant extract ursolic acid. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4022–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Defoirdt, T.; Crab, R.; Wood, T.K.; Sorgeloos, P.; Verstraete, W.; Bossier, P. Quorum sensing-disrupting brominated furanones protect the gnotobiotic brine shrimp Artemia franciscana from pathogenic Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio campbellii, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 6419–6423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bouyahya, A.; Dakka, N.; Et-Touys, A.; Abrini, J.; Bakri, Y. Medicinal plant products targeting quorum sensing for combating bacterial infections. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2017, 10, 729–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ravichandran, V.; Tamizh Manoharan, M.; Raj Chellappan, D.; Adline, P.S. Fructose furoic acid ester: An effective quorum sensing inhibitor against uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Bioorg. Chem. 2018, 79, 310–318. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ryu, E.; Sim, J.; Sim, J.; Lee, J.; Choi, B. D-Galactose as an autoinducer 2 inhibitor to control the biofilm formation of periodontopathogens. J. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 632–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jakobsen, T.; van Gennip, M.; Phipps, R.; Shanmugham, M.; Christensen, L.; Alhede, M.; Skindersoe, M.; Rasmussen, T.; Friedrich, K.; Uthe, F.; et al. Ajoene, a sulfur-rich molecule from garlic, inhibits genes controlled by quorum sensing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2314–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Zhu, P.; Li, M. Recent progresses on AI-2 bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhao, G.; Wan, W.; Mansouri, S.; Alfaro, J.; Bassler, B.; Cornell, K.; Zhou, Z. Chemical synthesis of S-ribosyl-L-homocysteine and activity assay as a LuxS substrate. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 3897–3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wnuk, S.F.; Robert, J.; Sobczak, A.J.; Meyers, B.P.; Malladi, V.L.A.; Zhu, J.; Gopishetty, B.; Pei, D. Inhibition of S-ribosylhomocysteinase (LuxS) by substrate analogues modified at the ribosyl C-3 position. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 6699–6706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Soni, K.; Jesudhasan, P.; Cepeda, M.; Widmer, K.; Jayaprakasha, G.; Patil, B.; Hume, M.; Pillai, S. Identification of ground beef-derived fatty acid inhibitors of autoinducer-2-based cell signaling. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Xing, J.; Chen, S.; Zhou, Z.; Shen, J.; Fu, X.; Ma, C.; Lu, Z.; Shi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Dai, X.; et al. Effect of 3,4-dibromo-2(5H)-furanone as a natural quorum sensing inhibitor on biofilm formation of Pseudomonas Fluourcens. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2017, 38, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  70. Eickhoff, M.J.; Bassler, B.L. SnapShot: Bacterial Quorum Sensing. Cell 2018, 174, 1328–1328.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Gunaratnam, S.; Millette, M.; Mcfarland, L.V.; Dupont, H.L.; Lacroix, M. Potential role of probiotics in reducing Clostridioides difficile virulence: Interference with quorum sensing systems. Microb. Pathog 2021, 153, 104798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Defoirdt, T. Quorum-Sensing Systems as Targets for Antivirulence Therapy. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 26, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Defoirdt, T.; Brackman, G.; Coenye, T. Quorum sensing inhibitors: How strong is the evidence? Trends Microbiol. 2013, 21, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 12 02006 g001 550
Figure 1. AI-2 signal molecule synthesis pathway. In bacteria, AI-2 is synthesized from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), a chemical that is closely related to metabolism. SAM can transfer methyl groups to different substrates to generate S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). SAH is catalyzed by 5′ methylthioadenosine nucleosidase (Pfs) to convert it sequentially into adenine and S-ribosylhomocysteine (SRH). LuxS, as a key enzyme in the methylation cycle, can catalyze SRH to form homocysteine. In the catalytic process, a precursor molecule 4,5 dihydroxy 2,3 pentanedione (DPD) of the AI-2 molecule will be formed. DPD is decomposed into R-THMF or the S-THMF-borate AI-2 signal molecule through cyclization and rearrangement.
Figure 1. AI-2 signal molecule synthesis pathway. In bacteria, AI-2 is synthesized from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), a chemical that is closely related to metabolism. SAM can transfer methyl groups to different substrates to generate S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). SAH is catalyzed by 5′ methylthioadenosine nucleosidase (Pfs) to convert it sequentially into adenine and S-ribosylhomocysteine (SRH). LuxS, as a key enzyme in the methylation cycle, can catalyze SRH to form homocysteine. In the catalytic process, a precursor molecule 4,5 dihydroxy 2,3 pentanedione (DPD) of the AI-2 molecule will be formed. DPD is decomposed into R-THMF or the S-THMF-borate AI-2 signal molecule through cyclization and rearrangement.
Life 12 02006 g001
Life 12 02006 g002 550
Figure 2. The action mechanisms of QSIs. (A) Emodin can decrease the levels of AI-2 signal molecules by down-regulating luxS gene expression, thus changing the phenotypes of the bacteria. (B) Paeoniflorin competes with AI-2 for LuxS protein, and paeoniflorin can interact with key amino acid residues of LuxS protein forming protein-ligand to inhibit AI-2 binding to LuxS. (C) AI-2 is a metabolite of the SAM cycle, and its synthesis depends on LuxS and Pfs. During AI-2 synthesis, SAM forms SAH under the catalysis of methyl transferase, and SAH degrades into SRH and adenine under the action of Pfs. Subsequently, SRH is catalyzed by LuxS to generate DPD and homocysteine. DPD is the precursor molecule of AI-2 and has high activity, which can cyclize itself to form AI-2. The resulting Homocysteine is catalyzed by MetF/K to get methyl regenerated and SAM again enters the metabolic cycle. PhT-ImmA targets MTAN enzymes and blocks the production of SAH, and the synthesis rate of AI-2 was significantly reduced. The SRH analog, as a pseudosignal molecule, cannot participate in the catalytic synthesis of DPD by LuxS, resulting in a decrease in the synthesis rate of AI-2. AI-2 analogs and TNRHNPHHLHHV directly acted on LuxS protein, which decreased the activity of LuxS protein, inhibited the synthesis of DPD, and reduced the synthesis of AI-2.
Figure 2. The action mechanisms of QSIs. (A) Emodin can decrease the levels of AI-2 signal molecules by down-regulating luxS gene expression, thus changing the phenotypes of the bacteria. (B) Paeoniflorin competes with AI-2 for LuxS protein, and paeoniflorin can interact with key amino acid residues of LuxS protein forming protein-ligand to inhibit AI-2 binding to LuxS. (C) AI-2 is a metabolite of the SAM cycle, and its synthesis depends on LuxS and Pfs. During AI-2 synthesis, SAM forms SAH under the catalysis of methyl transferase, and SAH degrades into SRH and adenine under the action of Pfs. Subsequently, SRH is catalyzed by LuxS to generate DPD and homocysteine. DPD is the precursor molecule of AI-2 and has high activity, which can cyclize itself to form AI-2. The resulting Homocysteine is catalyzed by MetF/K to get methyl regenerated and SAM again enters the metabolic cycle. PhT-ImmA targets MTAN enzymes and blocks the production of SAH, and the synthesis rate of AI-2 was significantly reduced. The SRH analog, as a pseudosignal molecule, cannot participate in the catalytic synthesis of DPD by LuxS, resulting in a decrease in the synthesis rate of AI-2. AI-2 analogs and TNRHNPHHLHHV directly acted on LuxS protein, which decreased the activity of LuxS protein, inhibited the synthesis of DPD, and reduced the synthesis of AI-2.
Life 12 02006 g002
Table
Table 1. S. suis quorum sensing inhibitors.
Table 1. S. suis quorum sensing inhibitors.
QSISourceMechanismReferences
EmodinRhubarbDown-regulates the luxS gene, inhibits AI-2 synthesis[10]
TTMHSIRTNRHNSyntheticInhibits AI-2 synthesis[31,32]
HSIRTGSKKPVPIIY
TNRHNPHHLHHV
Temprine-La(s)(T-La(s))SyntheticDecreases AI-2 concentrations and down-regulates biofilm-related genes[33]
Temprine-La(Fs)(T-La(Fs))
RGD-T-La(s)
RGD-T-La(Fs)
PaeoniflorinPeonyReduces the binding rate of AI-2 to receptors[34]
Coptis water extractHuanglianInhibits the expression of the luxS, gdh, fbps, and mrp genes[35]
Table
Table 2. Potential natural products quorum sensing inhibitors of S. suis.
Table 2. Potential natural products quorum sensing inhibitors of S. suis.
QSISourceBacteriaMechanismReferences
AndrographolideAndrographisEscherichia coliDecreases AI-2 activity[38]
CitralLemonVibrio harveyiReduces the synthesis of AI-2, inhibits the formation of biofilm[41]
FuranocoumarinGrapefruitVibrio harveyiReduces the synthesis of AI-2[42]
mangiferinMangoLactobacillus reuteriinhibitor of LuxS protein[49]
NaringinGrapefruitVibrio harveyiInhibits the AI-2-mediated QS system[54]
CassiaCassia oilEscherichia coliInhibits the production of AI-2[56]
Hexadecanoic acidBlack pepperVibrio harveyiSuppresses the QS system[57]
ApigeninCeleryVibrio harveyiInhibits the AI-2-mediated QS system[61]
Fructose furoatePlantsEscherichia coliInhibits the expression of QS system-related genes (fimA, csgA, espA)[62]
D-GalactoseLactoseVibrio harveyiReduces the synthesis of AI-2[63]
AjoeneGarlicPseudomonas aeruginosaSuppresses the QS system[64]
Table
Table 3. Potential synthetic quorum sensing inhibitors of S. suis.
Table 3. Potential synthetic quorum sensing inhibitors of S. suis.
QSIStructure DiagramBacteriaMechanismReferences
p-TolT-ImmALife 12 02006 i001Streptococcus
pneumoniae		Inhibits the MTAN enzyme, blocks the production of SRH and AI-2 signal molecules[36,65]
EtT-ImmALife 12 02006 i002
MeT-ImmALife 12 02006 i003Streptococcus
pneumoniae		Inhibits the MTAN enzyme, blocks the production of SRH and AI-2 signal molecules[36,65]
p-C1-PhT-DADMe-ImmALife 12 02006 i004Vibrio cholerae
Escherichia coli O157:H7
Streptococcus pneumoniae
MT-DADMe-immucillin-ALife 12 02006 i005
EtT-DADMe-immucillin-ALife 12 02006 i006Vibrio cholerae
BuT-DADMe-immucillin-ALife 12 02006 i007Vibrio cholerae
Escherichia coli
O157:H7
S-anhydroribosyl-L-homocysteineLife 12 02006 i008unknownSRH analogues, as substrates of the LuxS protein, exhibit inhibitory activity against the LuxS protein[48,66]
S-homoribosyl-L-cysteineLife 12 02006 i009
Aromatic sulfonesLife 12 02006 i010Vibrio harveyiSuppresses the AI-2 QS system[55]
Sulfones(S-1)Life 12 02006 i011
Sulfones(S-2)Life 12 02006 i012
SRH analog-1Life 12 02006 i013Bacillus subtilisReversible competitive inhibitors of luxS
SRH analog-2Life 12 02006 i014Bacillus subtilis[47]
SRH analogsLife 12 02006 i015Vibrio harveyi[67]
2-Methylpropyl-DPDLife 12 02006 i016Vibrio harveyi
Salmonella typhimurium		Inhibits the AI-2-mediated QS system[53]
Isopropyl-DPDLife 12 02006 i017
Neopentyl-DPDLife 12 02006 i018Vibrio harveyi
Salmonella typhimurium		Inhibits the AI-2-mediated QS system[53]
Pentyl-DPDLife 12 02006 i019
Linoleic acidLife 12 02006 i020Vibrio harveyiInhibits AI-2 QS and the formation of bacterial biofilms[68]
Oleic acidLife 12 02006 i021
Palmitic acidLife 12 02006 i022
3, 4-dibromo-2 (5H)-furanoneLife 12 02006 i023Campylobacter jejuniInterfere with QS system activity[69]
2(5H)-furanoneLife 12 02006 i024Inhibiting the activity of AI-2[44]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, B.; Shen, Y.; Zuo, J.; Song, D.; Fan, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yi, L.; Wang, Y. Bringing Antimicrobial Strategies to a New Level: The Quorum Sensing System as a Target to Control Streptococcus suis. Life 2022, 12, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122006

AMA Style

Xue B, Shen Y, Zuo J, Song D, Fan Q, Zhang X, Yi L, Wang Y. Bringing Antimicrobial Strategies to a New Level: The Quorum Sensing System as a Target to Control Streptococcus suis. Life. 2022; 12(12):2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Bingqian, Yamin Shen, Jing Zuo, Dong Song, Qingying Fan, Xiaoling Zhang, Li Yi, and Yang Wang. 2022. "Bringing Antimicrobial Strategies to a New Level: The Quorum Sensing System as a Target to Control Streptococcus suis" Life 12, no. 12: 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop