Next Article in Journal
Combinatorial Fusion Rules to Describe Codon Assignment in the Standard Genetic Code
Next Article in Special Issue
Treadmill Exercise after Controlled Abnormal Joint Movement Inhibits Cartilage Degeneration and Synovitis
Previous Article in Journal
MiRNA Expression in Patients with Gaucher Disease Treated with Enzyme Replacement Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sex-Specific Differences in Extracellular Vesicle Protein Cargo in Synovial Fluid of Patients with Osteoarthritis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/life11010003
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Fibrosis in Osteoarthritis Progression

by
Yeri Alice Rim
1 and
Ji Hyeon Ju
1,2,*
1
Catholic iPSC Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
2
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Institute of Medical Science, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2021, 11(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010003
Submission received: 4 December 2020 / Revised: 18 December 2020 / Accepted: 20 December 2020 / Published: 23 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Osteoarthritis Pathology and Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative joint disease where the main characteristics include cartilage degeneration and synovial membrane inflammation. These changes in the knee joint eventually dampen the function of the joint and restrict joint movement, which eventually leads to a stage where total joint replacement is the only treatment option. While much is still unknown about the pathogenesis and progression mechanism of OA, joint fibrosis can be a critical issue for better understanding this disease. Synovial fibrosis and the generation of fibrocartilage are the two main fibrosis-related characteristics that can be found in OA. However, these two processes remain mostly misunderstood. In this review, we focus on the fibrosis process in OA, especially in the cartilage and the synovium tissue, which are the main tissues involved in OA.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disease where the primary risk factors include traumatic joint injury or the mechanical disruption of joint tissues due to accumulated external forces. The etiology is multifactorial, and both environmental and genetic factors are thought to contribute to triggering the pathogenesis and progression of OA [1]. Critical hallmarks of OA include cartilage degeneration, osteophyte formation, and fibrosis in the joint tissue [2]. When left untreated, the defected joint eventually requires total joint replacement.
Tissue fibrosis occurs in various tissues, including the liver, kidney, heart, and others, and it eventually leads to organ failure. Fibrosis also occurs in the articular joint during the progression of OA and plays a critical role in OA pathogenesis and progression as well as cartilage destruction [3]. Joint fibrosis is characterized by the excessive accumulation of connective tissue, which eventually contributes to joint stiffness that results in intense pain during joint movement [4]. While the articular cartilage is unable to repair itself, affected chondrocytes often undergo de-differentiation and convert into fibrotic chondrocytes. Then, fibrotic chondrocytes secrete proteins that are similar to fibrocartilage, which is stiffer and mechanically inferior compared to the original hyaline cartilage [5,6]. Then, the cartilage defect recovers with fibrocartilage-like tissue that lacks its original function and even worsens the symptoms of OA [7]. This process also occurs in the cells (e.g., primary chondrocytes, mesenchymal stem cells) that are applied for OA therapy [8]. Synovitis caused by hyperplasia in the synovial membrane is also thought to be related to fibrosis [9].
In the past, OA was considered a disease that affects cartilage only; however, it is now recognized as a more complex disease. Not only is cartilage involved, but the subchondral bone, ligaments, and the synovium are all orchestrated under an inflamed environment, and fibrosis is thought to be included in this process [3]. In this review, the impact of fibrosis in the pathogenesis and progression of OA will be discussed.

2. Articular Cartilage and OA

Articular cartilage in the knee joint usually refers to hyaline cartilage, which is a lubricated smooth surface that absorbs the external forces to protect the ends of bones [10]. While chondrocytes are quiescent cells with a low proliferation rate, they have a highly active protein-synthesizing ability [11]. Articular cartilage is mainly composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) secreted by embedded chondrocytes, and only a small percentage of chondrocytes exist within the cartilage tissue [12]. Due to this unique composition, no blood vessels, lymph nodes, or nerves can be found in this tissue, which makes it more difficult to recover after damage because the delivery of nutrition or stem cells to the affected area is blocked by the thick ECM between each cell [10]. Articular cartilage has a poor intrinsic capability for self-repair [13].
OA is a common joint disease that is characterized by deformity and pain, which leads to a reduction in joint motion and function [14,15]. The main characteristic of OA is the defected or degraded cartilage tissue [15]. Defects in the cartilage tissue induced by trauma or aging can trigger the pathogenesis and progression of OA [16]. While OA can occur in relatively younger populations as a result of focal defects caused by extreme movements through activities such as sports, it usually affects the elderly population due to excessive use of the joints over time [17]. Classically, chondrocytes are categorized by the types of ECM proteins that they express [18]. Healthy articular chondrocytes that exist within the healthy articular cartilage are reported to express high levels of aggrecan and collagen type II, which are critical markers for hyaline cartilage [19]. However, the de-differentiation of chondrocytes in cartilage lesions induce the production of a reduced quality of hyaline cartilage, leading to the increased expression of fibrotic or OA markers such as collagen type I [20].
Repair of the articular cartilage has been attempted for several decades with various strategies, including cell-based therapies [15,21,22]. In previous studies, primary chondrocytes or adult stem cells such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been widely used for the treatment of cartilage lesions [5,23,24]. However, even with improved outcomes, one of the main disadvantages of cartilage regeneration or repair is the generation of fibrotic cartilage instead of hyaline cartilage [8]. The implanted or therapeutically delivered cells in the cartilage defect undergo fibrosis and induce fibrotic cartilage formation with an increased expression of collagen type I [8].
While fibrocartilage and fibrogenic chondrocytes can be found in other cartilaginous tissues such as the menisci or tendon, they have been shown to be detrimental when found in the articular cartilage [12]. Blocking the development of fibrocartilage and fibrosis remains a hurdle for cartilage treatment and regeneration.

3. Synovium and OA

Synovium, also referred to as the synovial membrane, lines the inner surface of the joint tissue (except for the articular cartilage) [25]. The major role of synovial tissue is to seal the synovial cavity and fluid to prevent leakage to other tissues. The synovium produces synovial fluid, which offers nutrition and oxygen to chondrocytes embedded in the articular cartilage by diffusion [26]. It is also responsible for synovial fluid maintenance by controlling the composition and total volume. Synovial fluid maintains the lubricated environment in the joint cavity by secreting lubricin and hyaluronic acid, which protect the cartilage from wear and tear [3].
Normal synovium is composed of two layers. The outer layer (subintima) is about 5 mm thick and consists of various connective tissues [27]. This layer has a large proportion of collagen type I. The inner layer (intima) directly lines the joint cavity, with a thickness of only 20–40 μm. The synovial membrane in OA joints is characterized by hyperplasia, vascularization, immune cell infiltration, increased levels of inflammatory molecules, and fibrosis [28]. The thickness of the synovium is significantly increased in OA. Several studies have suggested that synovitis is related to pain, and it can be a possible candidate for an OA progression trigger [28]. Histological changes in the OA-affected synovium include hyperplasia in the synovial lining and sub-lining fibrosis. Unlike the articular cartilage, the synovium contains abundant blood and nerve supply throughout the tissue [9]. As a result of this composition, the synovium is the main location where the infiltration of inflammatory cells occurs, which induces inflammation in the OA knee joint. Angiogenesis also contributes to chronic synovitis, which is thought to increase the inflammation in the OA knee joint [29]. In later stages of OA, surface fibrin deposition and fibrosis within the synovium can be commonly observed [30].
Recently, it has been suggested that the infrapatellar fat pad (IFP) and synovial membrane are one anatomofunctional unit rather than being recognized as two separate tissues [31,32]. The IFP, also known as Hoffa’s fat pad, is located below the knee cap (patella), specifically between the joint capsule and the synovial membrane [31]. It has several roles in the knee joint. The IFP protects the joint from mechanical stress by stabilizing the patella during exercise [33]. It also provides a vascular supply to the patellar tendon and the interior patellar pole [34]. The main cell type in the IFP is adipocytes; however, fibroblasts and other immune cells are also found [35]. Similar to other adipose tissues, the IFP secretes various cytokines and adipokines [36], and the IFP is reported to contribute to OA pathogenesis and the development of synovial fibrosis by promoting cell proliferation and migration [37]. The IFP is also suggested as the cause of anterior knee pain [38]. The IFP also interacts with other periarticular tissues, including the articular cartilage and the synovial membrane, during the progression of OA [39]. While synovitis and synovial fibrosis are thought to be critical to control OA, much is still unknown about this process.

4. Fibrosis and OA

Fibrosis is usually a wound healing process [3]. The classic wound healing process results in cell proliferation, differentiation, ECM production, and remodeling. However, an abnormal wound healing process can lead to the excessive secretion and deposition of ECM proteins in the tissue, followed by excessive fibrosis, which eventually results in scar formation, inflammation, and even damage in the tissue [40].
Fibrosis that occurs during OA induces joint stiffness and pain. As mentioned earlier, fibrosis is found in two events related to OA: (1) the generation of fibrotic cartilage during cartilage repair or OA progression (Figure 1A) and (2) synovial fibrosis during the onset and progression of OA (Figure 1B).

4.1. De-Differentiated Chondrocytes in OA

The composition of secreted ECM proteins by chondrocytes is altered in response to environmental changes within the joint, and the quality of cartilage is maintained by a balance of catabolic and anabolic processes [41]. The imbalance between these two processes under a diseased environment results in cartilage loss and degeneration. In the early stages of OA, quiescent articular chondrocytes become actively proliferative and form cell clusters in the cartilage lesion to adjust to changes in the cartilage microenvironment (Figure 2) [42,43]. The proliferative chondrocytes transit or de-differentiate into a fibroblastic phenotype that undergoes a drastic change in cell shape, metabolism, and cytoskeletal structure, eventually leading to the increased synthesis of collagen type I, which weakens the cartilage tissue by forming a mechanically-incompetent repaired fibrocartilage-like tissue [44]. The reduction in collagen type II expression and the increased expression of collagen type I is the main characteristics of articular chondrocyte de-differentiation and fibrosis [45]. In normal articular hyaline cartilage, only 1.7% of the total area is composed of collagen type I, while collagen type II makes up almost 100% [46]. Biochemical analysis also shows that 0.2% of the total collagen in the articular cartilage is collagen type I, and 96% is collagen type II [47]. Unlike hyaline cartilage, fibrocartilage has a low percentage of aggrecan and collagen type II, is rich in collagen type I, and has limited durability [48,49]. Despite the synthetic activity that de-differentiated chondrocytes maintain, the expression of aggrecan and collagen type II ceases and the secretion of collagen type I begins [50]. Isolated chondrocytes also undergo de-differentiation, and in vitro de-differentiated chondrocytes also express OA-related proteins, lose the hyaline chondrocyte phenotype, and gain a fibroblast-like phenotype [49,51,52]. After this proliferation process in advanced stages of OA, chondrocytes within the affected cartilage undergo de-differentiation and obtain a fibroblast-like phenotype that produces abnormal components such as fibronectin fragments and induce the formation of fibrocartilage instead of hyaline cartilage [51,53]. These changes in the cartilage environment ultimately reset the chondrocyte cell cycle and lead to abnormal chondrocyte proliferation and hypertrophic differentiation, which eventually results in chondrocyte apoptosis [50,51]. While the hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes is a normal pathway in developmental events, abnormal hypertrophic differentiation in adult cartilage is one of the causes of OA [54].

4.2. Synovial Fibrosis in OA

While synovitis occurs in various joint diseases, it is also a common symptom that is commonly found in OA [28]. Synovitis is a broad term for inflammation in the synovial membrane and is common in both early and late OA [9,55]. Synovitis in OA patients can be characterized by hyperplasia (thickening) of the cells lining the synovial membrane, increased stromal vascularization, the infiltration of inflammatory cells, and fibrosis of the sub-lining synovial cells (Figure 3) [28]. Synovial fibrosis is one of the characteristics of synovitis and also occurs also during the progression of OA. It is characterized by excessive fibroblast proliferation and an imbalance between collagen synthesis and catabolism [25,56]. In patients with OA, synovial tissue affected by fibrosis becomes thicker and rigid [30]. These symptoms contribute to the main characteristics of OA, such as joint pain and stiffness [57]. Fibrosis results in fibrin deposition in the synovial tissue [58]. While inflammation is observed more in the early stages of OA, it is reported that fibrosis was observed more in the late stages of OA [3,59].
While cartilage damage or degradation is the main characteristic of OA, molecules secreted from the degraded articular cartilage that are released into the synovial cavity initiate synovial inflammation [28]. Synoviocytes in the synovial membrane react to this process by producing pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors that attract immune cells by increasing angiogenesis and inducing both a phenotypic shift of articular chondrocytes and synovial fibrosis [60]. The affected de-differentiated articular chondrocytes then produce additional inflammatory cytokines and proteolytic enzymes that induce cartilage degradation and synovial inflammation [28,61]. Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ)-related pathways are thought to be the most critical type of pathway involved in the onset of synovial fibrosis. While TGFβ usually works as a positive mediator that promotes ECM protein synthesis in the cartilage, it can also cause fibrosis. TGFβ induces synovial fibrosis, attracts immune cells such as leukocytes, and induces osteophyte formation. The injection or overexpression of TGFβ has induced fibrosis in animal models of OA [62,63].
Angiogenesis and fibrosis are closely related to one another, and blood supply seems to be crucial during tissue fibrosis [64]. Various studies confirmed fibrosis in OA IFP [32,65,66]. The IFP forms numerous blood vessels with fibrous tissues, including the synovial membrane [67]. The formation of blood vessels in the IFP is reported to heal lesions that occur near the anterior cruciate ligament and other nearby tissues; however, this process also hastens the development of fibrosis in the knee joint after injury [34]. OA IFP has higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and is associated with the increased formation of blood vessels, along with the higher expression of monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) and interleukin (IL)-6 [68]. Higher expression of IL-6 in OA IFP was associated with increased levels of synovial membrane fibrosis, which proves that OA IFP affects the fibrosis process in the synovial tissue [66].
While OA IFP affects fibrosis in the synovial membrane, it has been also shown that the fibrotic environment also affects the OA IFP tissue in reverse. Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitors (ITIs) are plasma protease inhibitors that contributes to ECM stability by forming complexes with covalent linkage to hyaluronan [69]. While inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 5 (ITIH5) was reported to be highly expressed in white adipose tissue and obese subjects, Belluzzi et al. confirmed the increased expression of ITIH5 after observing increased fibrosis in the in OA IFP [70]. The study showed evidence for the first time that suggest the relationship between OA pathology and the expression of collagens and adipokines involved in fibrosis. This study also suggests the OA IFP tissue, especially its relationship with tissue fibrosis, as a possible therapeutic target to prevent OA progression.

5. Fibrosis-Related Markers in OA

Two main factors that are critical for fibrotic disease, namely TGFβ and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), are also elevated in OA and are the main candidates for the development of joint fibrosis. The overexpression of CTGF in the joints of mice induced synovial fibrosis [63]. CTGF expression can be induced by TGFβ; however, it can also function independently [2,3,71]. Scharstuhl et al. showed that TGFβ plays an important role in synovial thickening by fibrosis in experimental OA, and also that blocking this pathway prevented this process [72]. TGFβ promotes the formation of ECM by inducing collagen and fibronectin synthesis [73]. TGFβ also plays a critical role in fibrosis in various organs and is known to control cell proliferation, differentiation, immunity, and wound healing [2]. While TGFβ plays a critical role in cartilage fibrosis in patients with OA, blocking this molecule is not a treatment option since it is also a critical factor necessary for chondrogenesis. High levels of TGFβ exist in healthy cartilage, while low levels are found in OA cartilage [74]. Adequate levels of TGFβ even had protective effects on cartilage in animal models of arthritis; however, an excessive amount of this growth factor had adverse effects [75]. It is also reported that high concentrations of TGFβ exist in OA synovial fluids, which is produced by synoviocytes [76]. The administration of 20 ng of TGFβ was enough to increase the number of synovial lining cells by inducing fibroblast proliferation, along with collagen deposition [77]. The delivery of TGFβ by injection or transfection also resulted in increased synovial hyperplasia and osteophyte formation [78]. High levels of TGFβ activate the SMAD1-5-8 pathway instead of the SMAD2-3 pathway. The activation of the SMAD1-5-8 pathway upregulates genes related to fibrogenic differentiation and hypertrophy, and eventually induces synovial fibrosis and osteophyte formation [79]. However, it is reported that the difference between the two major growth factors is that fibrosis induced by TGFβ is relatively persistent, while CTGF-induced fibrosis is relatively temporary (about 28 days) [2]. Moreover, the viral delivery of TGFβ increased COL1A1 expression, but CTGF overexpression did not [80].
Collagen type I is also a well-known marker for fibrosis and has been detected in various fibrosis-related diseases, including OA [81,82,83]. Collagen type I and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) are key markers of both fibrocartilage formation and synovial fibrosis [84]. Remodeled cartilage in the defects of osteoarthritic cartilage show fibrotic characteristics such as increased levels of collagen type I and α-SMA [85,86,87]. Collagen type I is a major marker of unfavorable fibrocartilage and chondrocyte de-differentiation [8,88]. As mentioned earlier, in vitro de-differentiated chondrocytes express the OA-related de-differentiation marker collagen type I. Articular chondrocytes that undergo longer expansion times with multiple passages in monolayer culture end up in chondrocyte de-differentiation [89]. During the de-differentiation process, chondrocytes go through morphological and phenotypical changes and become fibroblastic, eventually producing collagen type I [88]. The compositional changes in the ECM also affect the chondrogenicity of MSCs [43]. MSCs cultured in collagen type II hydrogels showed higher expression of chondrogenic markers, which might indicate chondrocyte de-differentiation caused by collagen type I [90]. During OA progression, residential chondrocytes producing collagen type I might affect the subsequent chondrogenesis of MSCs [91]. Collagen type I is the major marker for fibrotic de-differentiated hyaline cartilage, but collagen type III is also thought to be related to the de-differentiation process, which suggests that it could also be a marker for the fibroblast-like phenotype. TGFβ1 markedly increased the SMA content in chondrocytes [92]. The secretion of α-SMA by OA chondrocytes has been verified and was observed to significantly increase in OA cartilage, along with collagen type III [51,84].
The de-differentiated chondrocytes and fibrocartilage formed in the articular cartilage lesion produce pro-inflammatory mediators that further induce cartilage degeneration and synovial inflammation. IL-1β has been identified as the most prevalent cytokine in OA, which is involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [93]. IL-1β also interferes with the production of hyaline cartilage structural proteins, collagen type II, and aggrecan by altering chondrocyte characteristics.
Proteases are actively involved in the pathogenesis of OA. Proteases, including matrix metallopeptidases (MMPs), disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTSs), mainly degrade the main hyaline cartilage ECM proteins aggrecan and collagen type II [94]. MMPs are a zinc-dependent enzyme family that degrades ECM proteins in the articular cartilage. Various types of MMPs exist and can be categorized into several groups: collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, metalloelastases, and more. Of all the MMPs, MMP13 is considered to be the most important agent for collagen degradation that leads to OA, as it degrades collagen type II [95,96]. Some MMPs have also been proposed to regulate ADAMTS activity [97]. ADAMTSs eventually circulate in a vital cycle between the degenerated chondrocyte and other cells near it, such as synoviocytes in the synovial membrane. These proteases are also reported to be related to fibrosis in several diseases including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, liver fibrosis, and others [98,99]. Therefore, they are also thought to be related to joint fibrosis; however, there is currently little information on the direct relationship between the two factors.
Other markers such as procollagen lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 2 (PLOD2), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1) are reported to increase in OA-related fibrosis and are also considered fibrotic markers [3,100]. PLOD2 is an enzyme related to collagen crosslinking that induces pyrodinoline crosslink formation [3]. Pyrodinoline crosslinks make collagen fibers resistant to collagen degradation, which makes them more rigid and results in collagen accumulation in fibrotic tissues [101]. Collagen accumulation is induced by reduced levels of collagen degradation, inducing increased pyridinoline crosslinks per collagen triple helix [101]. Remst et al. confirmed the presence of increased levels of PLOD2 and an increased pyridinoline crosslink/collagen ratio in OA synovium, and this expression increased along with the severity of OA. While the presence of fibrosis in OA patients was unknown, it is expected that PLOD2 may have higher expression in the subpopulation of OA patients with fibrosis. Ueki et al. confirmed that the knockout of PLOD2 inhibited the tumorigenesis role of integrin β1 in tumor cells [102]. While it is still controversial, integrins are reported to be closely related to the pathogenesis of OA, and the confirmation of this process in OA might suggest a new candidate for OA treatment [103,104]. TIMP1 is an inhibitor of matrix metallopeptidases (MMPs), which are well known for their role in OA. The elevation of TIMP1 expression was confirmed in various fibrotic diseases, including synovial fibrosis in OA [105]. TIMP1 elevation in fibrotic tissue is induced by elevated levels of TGFβ, and TIMP1 induces fibrosis via the downregulation of MMPs [106]. The relationship between hypoxia and synovial fibrosis has been also shown by observing the expression of HIF-1α; the expression of TGFβ, COL1A1, PLOD2, and TIMP1 was downregulated by the inhibition of HIF-1α in rat models of OA [107].

6. Strategies for OA Treatment Targeting Fibrosis

Various studies have shown evidence of a scarring response in OA joint tissues [41,108,109,110,111]. These studies suggest that fibrotic scarring of the joint tissue can be an important target for OA therapy.
Liu and colleagues reported that asiatic acid (AA) reduces the hypertrophic and fibrotic differentiation of chondrocytes [84]. AA is a pentacyclic triterpene that exhibits various clinical effects, including anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. While AA already has already shown positive effects in liver fibrosis, it has also successfully reduced the levels of collagen type I and α-SMA in OA models. This process was achieved by regulating the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) signaling pathway.
TGFβ and activin receptor-like kinase 5 (ALK5) is thought to be a critical cause of synovial fibrosis [3]. Blocking ALK5 promoted MMP13 expression and reduced the expression of collagen type II in chondrocytes [112]. While the TGFβ/smad signaling pathway is already known to be closely related to fibrosis in various tissues, the increased expression of smad2/3 and smad4 was observed in the scar tissue prevalent after myocardial infarction [113]. Based on this result, Xue et al. confirmed the role of smad4 in fibrosis by knocking down the smad4 gene in rat synovial cells and chondrocytes [73]. The knockdown of the smad4 gene decreased the proliferation rate of cells induced by TGFβ1, along with the expression of other fibrosis markers such as vimentin, α-SMA, collagen type I, and TIMP1.
Fibrosis during cartilage de-differentiation is a critical issue in in vitro chondrogenesis for the development of regenerative medicine for defected joints, particularly for the culture of cartilage tissue. The increased expression of collagen type I and type X is a major issue in in vitro cartilage regeneration and in repaired cartilage by transplanted cells [13,114]. While the expansion of primary chondrocytes readily results in de-differentiation, research on the generation of chondrocytes from progenitor cells is ongoing. While adult stem cells such as MSCs have mainly been used prior to the isolation of pluripotent stem cells, currently, in vitro chondrogenesis is actively done using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Using several growth factors such as TGFs or bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), in vitro chondrogenesis has been attempted using various methods. The three-dimensional culture of stem-cell-derived chondrogenic progenitor cells showed the highest differentiation efficacy and a lower expression of fibrotic markers [13,114,115,116]. Despite several decades of progress in this area of research, the generation of a stable chondrocyte using progenitor cells or stem cells remains a major hurdle for cartilage regeneration and treatment [117].

7. Conclusions

The initiation and progression of OA is a complex process. The reduction in fibrotic markers such as collagen type I should be a major focus of OA treatment. In this review, we focused on the two fibrosis processes that are related to the key characteristics of OA: (1) fibrosis induced by chondrocyte de-differentiation and (2) synovial fibrosis in synovitis. Much remains unknown about the relationship between OA and fibrosis. Therefore, further study on fibrosis in OA should be conducted to gain a better understanding of this potential therapeutic target for OA treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.A.R.; writing—review and editing, J.H.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1I1A1A01060753). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT, MSIT) (NRF-2020R1A1C3004123). This work was also supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (HI16C2177).

Acknowledgments

In this section, you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, H.; Yang, L.; Yu, F.F.; Wang, S.; Wu, C.; Qu, C.; Lammi, M.J.; Guo, X. The potential of induced pluripotent stem cells as a tool to study skeletal dysplasias and cartilage-related pathologic conditions. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017, 25, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Remst, D.F.; Blaney Davidson, E.N.; Vitters, E.L.; Blom, A.B.; Stoop, R.; Snabel, J.M.; Bank, R.A.; van den Berg, W.B.; van der Kraan, P.M. Osteoarthritis-related fibrosis is associated with both elevated pyridinoline cross-link formation and lysyl hydroxylase 2b expression. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2013, 21, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Remst, D.F.; Blaney Davidson, E.N.; van der Kraan, P.M. Unravelling osteoarthritis-related synovial fibrosis: A step closer to solving joint stiffness. Rheumatology 2015, 54, 1954–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hill, C.L.; Hunter, D.J.; Niu, J.; Clancy, M.; Guermazi, A.; Genant, H.; Gale, D.; Grainger, A.; Conaghan, P.; Felson, D.T. Synovitis detected on magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to pain and cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007, 66, 1599–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Phull, A.R.; Eo, S.H.; Abbas, Q.; Ahmed, M.; Kim, S.J. Applications of Chondrocyte-Based Cartilage Engineering: An Overview. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1879837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dell’Accio, F.; De Bari, C.; Luyten, F.P. Microenvironment and phenotypic stability specify tissue formation by human articular cartilage-derived cells in vivo. Exp. Cell Res. 2003, 287, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karuppal, R. Current concepts in the articular cartilage repair and regeneration. J. Orthop. 2017, 14, A1–A3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Armiento, A.R.; Alini, M.; Stoddart, M.J. Articular fibrocartilage—Why does hyaline cartilage fail to repair? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 146, 289–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wenham, C.Y.; Conaghan, P.G. The role of synovitis in osteoarthritis. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2010, 2, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sophia Fox, A.J.; Bedi, A.; Rodeo, S.A. The basic science of articular cartilage: Structure, composition, and function. Sports Health 2009, 1, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Otero, M.; Favero, M.; Dragomir, C.; Hachem, K.E.; Hashimoto, K.; Plumb, D.A.; Goldring, M.B. Human chondrocyte cultures as models of cartilage-specific gene regulation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 806, 301–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, L.; Hu, J.; Athanasiou, K.A. The role of tissue engineering in articular cartilage repair and regeneration. Crit Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 37, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rim, Y.A.; Nam, Y.; Park, N.; Lee, J.; Park, S.H.; Ju, J.H. Repair potential of nonsurgically delivered induced pluripotent stem cell-derived chondrocytes in a rat osteochondral defect model. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2018, 12, 1843–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kidd, B. Mechanisms of pain in osteoarthritis. HSS J. 2012, 8, 26–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Roseti, L.; Desando, G.; Cavallo, C.; Petretta, M.; Grigolo, B. Articular Cartilage Regeneration in Osteoarthritis. Cells 2019, 8, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Samvelyan, H.J.; Hughes, D.; Stevens, C.; Staines, K.A. Models of Osteoarthritis: Relevance and New Insights. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Shane Anderson, A.; Loeser, R.F. Why is osteoarthritis an age-related disease? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2010, 24, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sanchez, C.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Pap, T.; Dvir-Ginzberg, M.; Quasnichka, H.; Barrett-Jolley, R.; Mobasheri, A.; Henrotin, Y. Chondrocyte secretome: A source of novel insights and exploratory biomarkers of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017, 25, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Luo, Y.; Sinkeviciute, D.; He, Y.; Karsdal, M.; Henrotin, Y.; Mobasheri, A.; Onnerfjord, P.; Bay-Jensen, A. The minor collagens in articular cartilage. Protein Cell 2017, 8, 560–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ecke, A.; Lutter, A.H.; Scholka, J.; Hansch, A.; Becker, R.; Anderer, U. Tissue Specific Differentiation of Human Chondrocytes Depends on Cell Microenvironment and Serum Selection. Cells 2019, 8, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ilic, D.; Polak, J.M. Stem cells in regenerative medicine: Introduction. Br. Med. Bull. 2011, 98, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Freitag, J.; Kenihan, M.A. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Osteoarthritis and Regenerative Medicine. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 441–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Minas, T.; Gomoll, A.H.; Solhpour, S.; Rosenberger, R.; Probst, C.; Bryant, T. Autologous chondrocyte implantation for joint preservation in patients with early osteoarthritis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sato, M.; Yamato, M.; Mitani, G.; Takagaki, T.; Hamahashi, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Ishihara, M.; Matoba, R.; Kobayashi, H.; Okano, T.; et al. Combined surgery and chondrocyte cell-sheet transplantation improves clinical and structural outcomes in knee osteoarthritis. NPJ Regen. Med. 2019, 4, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Scanzello, C.R.; Goldring, S.R. The role of synovitis in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Bone 2012, 51, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kurowska-Stolarska, M.; Alivernini, S. Synovial tissue macrophages: Friend or foe? RMD Open 2017, 3, e000527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Smith, M.D. The normal synovium. Open Rheumatol. J. 2011, 5, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mathiessen, A.; Conaghan, P.G. Synovitis in osteoarthritis: Current understanding with therapeutic implications. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017, 19, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Walsh, D.A.; Bonnet, C.S.; Turner, E.L.; Wilson, D.; Situ, M.; McWilliams, D.F. Angiogenesis in the synovium and at the osteochondral junction in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2007, 15, 743–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Loeuille, D.; Chary-Valckenaere, I.; Champigneulle, J.; Rat, A.C.; Toussaint, F.; Pinzano-Watrin, A.; Goebel, J.C.; Mainard, D.; Blum, A.; Pourel, J.; et al. Macroscopic and microscopic features of synovial membrane inflammation in the osteoarthritic knee: Correlating magnetic resonance imaging findings with disease severity. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52, 3492–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Belluzzi, E.; Stocco, E.; Pozzuoli, A.; Granzotto, M.; Porzionato, A.; Vettor, R.; De Caro, R.; Ruggieri, P.; Ramonda, R.; Rossato, M.; et al. Contribution of Infrapatellar Fat Pad and Synovial Membrane to Knee Osteoarthritis Pain. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 6390182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Eymard, F.; Pigenet, A.; Citadelle, D.; Tordjman, J.; Foucher, L.; Rose, C.; Flouzat Lachaniette, C.H.; Rouault, C.; Clement, K.; Berenbaum, F.; et al. Knee and hip intra-articular adipose tissues (IAATs) compared with autologous subcutaneous adipose tissue: A specific phenotype for a central player in osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1142–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Belluzzi, E.; El Hadi, H.; Granzotto, M.; Rossato, M.; Ramonda, R.; Macchi, V.; De Caro, R.; Vettor, R.; Favero, M. Systemic and Local Adipose Tissue in Knee Osteoarthritis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 232, 1971–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dragoo, J.L.; Johnson, C.; McConnell, J. Evaluation and treatment of disorders of the infrapatellar fat pad. Sports Med. 2012, 42, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Eymard, F.; Chevalier, X. Inflammation of the infrapatellar fat pad. Jt. Bone Spine 2016, 83, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ushiyama, T.; Chano, T.; Inoue, K.; Matsusue, Y. Cytokine production in the infrapatellar fat pad: Another source of cytokines in knee synovial fluids. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2003, 62, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bastiaansen-Jenniskens, Y.M.; Wei, W.; Feijt, C.; Waarsing, J.H.; Verhaar, J.A.; Zuurmond, A.M.; Hanemaaijer, R.; Stoop, R.; van Osch, G.J. Stimulation of fibrotic processes by the infrapatellar fat pad in cultured synoviocytes from patients with osteoarthritis: A possible role for prostaglandin f2alpha. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 2070–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Draghi, F.; Ferrozzi, G.; Urciuoli, L.; Bortolotto, C.; Bianchi, S. Hoffa’s fat pad abnormalities, knee pain and magnetic resonance imaging in daily practice. Insights Imaging 2016, 7, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zeng, N.; Yan, Z.P.; Chen, X.Y.; Ni, G.X. Infrapatellar Fat Pad and Knee Osteoarthritis. Aging Dis. 2020, 11, 1317–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chan, D.D.; Li, J.; Luo, W.; Predescu, D.N.; Cole, B.J.; Plaas, A. Pirfenidone reduces subchondral bone loss and fibrosis after murine knee cartilage injury. J. Orthop. Res. 2018, 36, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Archer, C.W.; Francis-West, P. The chondrocyte. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2003, 35, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pearle, A.D.; Warren, R.F.; Rodeo, S.A. Basic science of articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Clin. Sports Med. 2005, 24, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Maldonado, M.; Nam, J. The role of changes in extracellular matrix of cartilage in the presence of inflammation on the pathology of osteoarthritis. BioMed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 284873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hall, A.C. The Role of Chondrocyte Morphology and Volume in Controlling Phenotype-Implications for Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Repair, and Cartilage Engineering. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2019, 21, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Darling, E.M.; Athanasiou, K.A. Rapid phenotypic changes in passaged articular chondrocyte subpopulations. J. Orthop. Res. 2005, 23, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Roberts, S.; Menage, J.; Sandell, L.J.; Evans, E.H.; Richardson, J.B. Immunohistochemical study of collagen types I and II and procollagen IIA in human cartilage repair tissue following autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee 2009, 16, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dickinson, S.C.; Sims, T.J.; Pittarello, L.; Soranzo, C.; Pavesio, A.; Hollander, A.P. Quantitative outcome measures of cartilage repair in patients treated by tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2005, 11, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kwon, H.; Brown, W.E.; Lee, C.A.; Wang, D.; Paschos, N.; Hu, J.C.; Athanasiou, K.A. Surgical and tissue engineering strategies for articular cartilage and meniscus repair. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2019, 15, 550–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mao, Y.; Block, T.; Singh-Varma, A.; Sheldrake, A.; Leeth, R.; Griffey, S.; Kohn, J. Extracellular matrix derived from chondrocytes promotes rapid expansion of human primary chondrocytes in vitro with reduced dedifferentiation. Acta Biomater. 2019, 85, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sandell, L.J.; Aigner, T. Articular cartilage and changes in arthritis. An introduction: Cell biology of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. 2001, 3, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Deroyer, C.; Charlier, E.; Neuville, S.; Malaise, O.; Gillet, P.; Kurth, W.; Chariot, A.; Malaise, M.; de Seny, D. CEMIP (KIAA1199) induces a fibrosis-like process in osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Schnabel, M.; Marlovits, S.; Eckhoff, G.; Fichtel, I.; Gotzen, L.; Vecsei, V.; Schlegel, J. Dedifferentiation-associated changes in morphology and gene expression in primary human articular chondrocytes in cell culture. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2002, 10, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lorenz, H.; Richter, W. Osteoarthritis: Cellular and molecular changes in degenerating cartilage. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 2006, 40, 135–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rim, Y.A.; Nam, Y.; Ju, J.H. The Role of Chondrocyte Hypertrophy and Senescence in Osteoarthritis Initiation and Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Goldenberg, D.L.; Egan, M.S.; Cohen, A.S. Inflammatory synovitis in degenerative joint disease. J. Rheumatol. 1982, 9, 204–209. [Google Scholar]
  56. Li, D.; Wang, H.; He, J.Y.; Wang, C.L.; Feng, W.J.; Shen, C.; Zhu, J.F.; Wang, D.L.; Chen, X.D. Inflammatory and fibrosis infiltration in synovium associated with the progression in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 19, 2808–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abbasi, B.; Pezeshki-Rad, M.; Akhavan, R.; Sahebari, M. Association between clinical and sonographic synovitis in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 20, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Akkiraju, H.; Nohe, A. Role of Chondrocytes in Cartilage Formation, Progression of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Regeneration. J. Dev. Biol. 2015, 3, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Oehler, S.; Neureiter, D.; Meyer-Scholten, C.; Aigner, T. Subtyping of osteoarthritic synoviopathy. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2002, 20, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Goldring, M.B. Chondrogenesis, chondrocyte differentiation, and articular cartilage metabolism in health and osteoarthritis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2012, 4, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Berenbaum, F.; Eymard, F.; Houard, X. Osteoarthritis, inflammation and obesity. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2013, 25, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. van Beuningen, H.M.; Glansbeek, H.L.; van der Kraan, P.M.; van den Berg, W.B. Differential effects of local application of BMP-2 or TGF-beta 1 on both articular cartilage composition and osteophyte formation. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 1998, 6, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Blaney Davidson, E.N.; Vitters, E.L.; Mooren, F.M.; Oliver, N.; Berg, W.B.; van der Kraan, P.M. Connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 overexpression in mouse synovial lining results in transient fibrosis and cartilage damage. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 1653–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rosmorduc, O.; Housset, C. Hypoxia: A link between fibrogenesis, angiogenesis, and carcinogenesis in liver disease. Semin. Liver Dis. 2010, 30, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fontanella, C.G.; Belluzzi, E.; Rossato, M.; Olivotto, E.; Trisolino, G.; Ruggieri, P.; Rubini, A.; Porzionato, A.; Natali, A.; De Caro, R.; et al. Quantitative MRI analysis of infrapatellar and suprapatellar fat pads in normal controls, moderate and end-stage osteoarthritis. Ann. Anat. 2019, 221, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Favero, M.; El-Hadi, H.; Belluzzi, E.; Granzotto, M.; Porzionato, A.; Sarasin, G.; Rambaldo, A.; Iacobellis, C.; Cigolotti, A.; Fontanella, C.G.; et al. Infrapatellar fat pad features in osteoarthritis: A histopathological and molecular study. Rheumatology 2017, 56, 1784–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Abreu, M.R.; Chung, C.B.; Trudell, D.; Resnick, D. Hoffa’s fat pad injuries and their relationship with anterior cruciate ligament tears: New observations based on MR imaging in patients and MR imaging and anatomic correlation in cadavers. Skelet. Radiol. 2008, 37, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gallagher, J.; Tierney, P.; Murray, P.; O’Brien, M. The infrapatellar fat pad: Anatomy and clinical correlations. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2005, 13, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hamm, A.; Veeck, J.; Bektas, N.; Wild, P.J.; Hartmann, A.; Heindrichs, U.; Kristiansen, G.; Werbowetski-Ogilvie, T.; Del Maestro, R.; Knuechel, R.; et al. Frequent expression loss of Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain (ITIH) genes in multiple human solid tumors: A systematic expression analysis. BMC Cancer 2008, 8, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Belluzzi, E.; Macchi, V.; Fontanella, C.G.; Carniel, E.L.; Olivotto, E.; Filardo, G.; Sarasin, G.; Porzionato, A.; Granzotto, M.; Pozzuoli, A.; et al. Infrapatellar Fat Pad Gene Expression and Protein Production in Patients with and without Osteoarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Blom, I.E.; Goldschmeding, R.; Leask, A. Gene regulation of connective tissue growth factor: New targets for antifibrotic therapy? Matrix Biol. 2002, 21, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Scharstuhl, A.; Vitters, E.L.; van der Kraan, P.M.; van den Berg, W.B. Reduction of osteophyte formation and synovial thickening by adenoviral overexpression of transforming growth factor beta/bone morphogenetic protein inhibitors during experimental osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48, 3442–3451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Xue, M.; Gong, S.; Dai, J.; Chen, G.; Hu, J. The Treatment of Fibrosis of Joint Synovium and Frozen Shoulder by Smad4 Gene Silencing in Rats. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Verdier, M.P.; Seite, S.; Guntzer, K.; Pujol, J.P.; Boumediene, K. Immunohistochemical analysis of transforming growth factor beta isoforms and their receptors in human cartilage from normal and osteoarthritic femoral heads. Rheumatol. Int. 2005, 25, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Glansbeek, H.L.; van Beuningen, H.M.; Vitters, E.L.; van der Kraan, P.M.; van den Berg, W.B. Stimulation of articular cartilage repair in established arthritis by local administration of transforming growth factor-beta into murine knee joints. Lab. Investig. 1998, 78, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Ruiz, M.; Maumus, M.; Fonteneau, G.; Pers, Y.M.; Ferreira, R.; Dagneaux, L.; Delfour, C.; Houard, X.; Berenbaum, F.; Rannou, F.; et al. TGFbetai is involved in the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and is dysregulated in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2019, 27, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Allen, J.B.; Manthey, C.L.; Hand, A.R.; Ohura, K.; Ellingsworth, L.; Wahl, S.M. Rapid onset synovial inflammation and hyperplasia induced by transforming growth factor beta. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 171, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. van Beuningen, H.M.; Glansbeek, H.L.; van der Kraan, P.M.; van den Berg, W.B. Osteoarthritis-like changes in the murine knee joint resulting from intra-articular transforming growth factor-beta injections. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2000, 8, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. van der Kraan, P.M. The changing role of TGFbeta in healthy, ageing and osteoarthritic joints. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2017, 13, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bonniaud, P.; Margetts, P.J.; Kolb, M.; Haberberger, T.; Kelly, M.; Robertson, J.; Gauldie, J. Adenoviral gene transfer of connective tissue growth factor in the lung induces transient fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 168, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Trojanowska, M.; LeRoy, E.C.; Eckes, B.; Krieg, T. Pathogenesis of fibrosis: Type 1 collagen and the skin. J. Mol. Med. 1998, 76, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Hansen, N.U.; Karsdal, M.A.; Brockbank, S.; Cruwys, S.; Ronnow, S.; Leeming, D.J. Tissue turnover of collagen type I, III and elastin is elevated in the PCLS model of IPF and can be restored back to vehicle levels using a phosphodiesterase inhibitor. Respir. Res. 2016, 17, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Wu, L.; Petrigliano, F.A.; Ba, K.; Lee, S.; Bogdanov, J.; McAllister, D.R.; Adams, J.S.; Rosenthal, A.K.; Van Handel, B.; Crooks, G.M.; et al. Lysophosphatidic acid mediates fibrosis in injured joints by regulating collagen type I biosynthesis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2015, 23, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Liu, N.; Fu, D.; Yang, J.; Liu, P.; Song, X.; Wang, X.; Li, R.; Fu, Z.; Chen, J.; Gong, X.; et al. Asiatic acid attenuates hypertrophic and fibrotic differentiation of articular chondrocytes via AMPK/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2020, 22, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Adam, M.; Deyl, Z. Altered expression of collagen phenotype in osteoarthrosis. Clin. Chim. Acta 1983, 133, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Charlier, E.; Deroyer, C.; Ciregia, F.; Malaise, O.; Neuville, S.; Plener, Z.; Malaise, M.; de Seny, D. Chondrocyte dedifferentiation and osteoarthritis (OA). Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 165, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gay, S.; Muller, P.K.; Lemmen, C.; Remberger, K.; Matzen, K.; Kuhn, K. Immunohistological study on collagen in cartilage-bone metamorphosis and degenerative osteoarthrosis. Klin. Wochenschr. 1976, 54, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Giannoni, P.; Cancedda, R. Articular chondrocyte culturing for cell-based cartilage repair: Needs and perspectives. Cells Tissues Organs 2006, 184, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tallheden, T.; Bengtsson, C.; Brantsing, C.; Sjogren-Jansson, E.; Carlsson, L.; Peterson, L.; Brittberg, M.; Lindahl, A. Proliferation and differentiation potential of chondrocytes from osteoarthritic patients. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2005, 7, R560–R568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Bosnakovski, D.; Mizuno, M.; Kim, G.; Takagi, S.; Okumura, M.; Fujinaga, T. Chondrogenic differentiation of bovine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in different hydrogels: Influence of collagen type II extracellular matrix on MSC chondrogenesis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 93, 1152–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lu, Z.; Doulabi, B.Z.; Huang, C.; Bank, R.A.; Helder, M.N. Collagen type II enhances chondrogenesis in adipose tissue-derived stem cells by affecting cell shape. Tissue Eng. Part A 2010, 16, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zaleskas, J.M.; Kinner, B.; Freyman, T.M.; Yannas, I.V.; Gibson, L.J.; Spector, M. Growth factor regulation of smooth muscle actin expression and contraction of human articular chondrocytes and meniscal cells in a collagen-GAG matrix. Exp. Cell Res. 2001, 270, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chow, Y.Y.; Chin, K.Y. The Role of Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2020, 2020, 8293921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Murphy, G.; Lee, M.H. What are the roles of metalloproteinases in cartilage and bone damage? Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2005, 64 (Suppl. 4), iv44–iv47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mehana, E.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; El-Blehi, S.S. The role of matrix metalloproteinases in osteoarthritis pathogenesis: An updated review. Life Sci. 2019, 234, 116786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Griffin, F.M.; Math, K.; Scuderi, G.R.; Insall, J.N.; Poilvache, P.L. Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J. Arthroplast. 2000, 15, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Patwari, P.; Gao, G.; Lee, J.H.; Grodzinsky, A.J.; Sandy, J.D. Analysis of ADAMTS4 and MT4-MMP indicates that both are involved in aggrecanolysis in interleukin-1-treated bovine cartilage. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2005, 13, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Gaggar, A.; Hector, A.; Bratcher, P.E.; Mall, M.A.; Griese, M.; Hartl, D. The role of matrix metalloproteinases in cystic fibrosis lung disease. Eur. Respir. J. 2011, 38, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Craig, V.J.; Zhang, L.; Hagood, J.S.; Owen, C.A. Matrix metalloproteinases as therapeutic targets for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015, 53, 585–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Zhang, L.; Xing, R.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Wang, P. Inhibition of Synovial Macrophage Pyroptosis Alleviates Synovitis and Fibrosis in Knee Osteoarthritis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 2165918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. van der Slot, A.J.; Zuurmond, A.M.; van den Bogaerdt, A.J.; Ulrich, M.M.; Middelkoop, E.; Boers, W.; Karel Ronday, H.; DeGroot, J.; Huizinga, T.W.; Bank, R.A. Increased formation of pyridinoline cross-links due to higher telopeptide lysyl hydroxylase levels is a general fibrotic phenomenon. Matrix Biol. 2004, 23, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ueki, Y.; Saito, K.; Iioka, H.; Sakamoto, I.; Kanda, Y.; Sakaguchi, M.; Horii, A.; Kondo, E. PLOD2 Is Essential to Functional Activation of Integrin beta1 for Invasion/Metastasis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas. iScience 2020, 23, 100850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Loeser, R.F. Integrins and chondrocyte-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. Matrix Biol. 2014, 39, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhang, L.Q.; Zhao, G.Z.; Xu, X.Y.; Fang, J.; Chen, J.M.; Li, J.W.; Gao, X.J.; Hao, L.J.; Chen, Y.Z. Integrin-beta1 regulates chondrocyte proliferation and apoptosis through the upregulation of GIT1 expression. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2015, 35, 1074–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Remst, D.F.; Blom, A.B.; Vitters, E.L.; Bank, R.A.; van den Berg, W.B.; Blaney Davidson, E.N.; van der Kraan, P.M. Gene expression analysis of murine and human osteoarthritis synovium reveals elevation of transforming growth factor beta-responsive genes in osteoarthritis-related fibrosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014, 66, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yoshiji, H.; Kuriyama, S.; Miyamoto, Y.; Thorgeirsson, U.P.; Gomez, D.E.; Kawata, M.; Yoshii, J.; Ikenaka, Y.; Noguchi, R.; Tsujinoue, H.; et al. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 promotes liver fibrosis development in a transgenic mouse model. Hepatology 2000, 32, 1248–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Z.; Xing, R.; Li, X.; Yin, S.; Mao, J.; Zhang, N.; Mei, W.; Ding, L.; et al. Increased HIF-1alpha in Knee Osteoarthritis Aggravate Synovial Fibrosis via Fibroblast-Like Synoviocyte Pyroptosis. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 6326517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Nakamae, A.; Engebretsen, L.; Bahr, R.; Krosshaug, T.; Ochi, M. Natural history of bone bruises after acute knee injury: Clinical outcome and histopathological findings. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2006, 14, 1252–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Matthews, J.L.; Chung, M.; Matyas, J.R. Indirect injury stimulates scar formation-adaptation or pathology? Connect. Tissue Res. 2004, 45, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Harris, J.D.; Hussey, K.; Wilson, H.; Pilz, K.; Gupta, A.K.; Gomoll, A.; Cole, B.J. Biological knee reconstruction for combined malalignment, meniscal deficiency, and articular cartilage disease. Arthroscopy 2015, 31, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Link, T.M.; Li, X. Bone marrow changes in osteoarthritis. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2011, 15, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Blaney Davidson, E.N.; Remst, D.F.; Vitters, E.L.; van Beuningen, H.M.; Blom, A.B.; Goumans, M.J.; van den Berg, W.B.; van der Kraan, P.M. Increase in ALK1/ALK5 ratio as a cause for elevated MMP-13 expression in osteoarthritis in humans and mice. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 7937–7945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Hao, J.; Ju, H.; Zhao, S.; Junaid, A.; Scammell-La Fleur, T.; Dixon, I.M. Elevation of expression of Smads 2, 3, and 4, decorin and TGF-beta in the chronic phase of myocardial infarct scar healing. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1999, 31, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Nam, Y.; Rim, Y.A.; Jung, S.M.; Ju, J.H. Cord blood cell-derived iPSCs as a new candidate for chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage regeneration. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Guzzo, R.M.; Gibson, J.; Xu, R.H.; Lee, F.Y.; Drissi, H. Efficient differentiation of human iPSC-derived mesenchymal stem cells to chondroprogenitor cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 114, 480–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rim, Y.A.; Nam, Y.; Park, N.; Jung, H.; Lee, K.; Lee, J.; Ju, J.H. Chondrogenic Differentiation from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using Non-Viral Minicircle Vectors. Cells 2020, 9, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Duan, L.; Ma, B.; Liang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhu, W.; Li, M.; Wang, D. Cytokine networking of chondrocyte dedifferentiation in vitro and its implications for cell-based cartilage therapy. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2015, 7, 194–208. [Google Scholar]
Life 11 00003 g001 550
Figure 1. Fibrosis in synovial and cartilage tissue. (A) The normal joint consists of a smooth layer of articular cartilage and a smooth layer of synovial membrane on the side that maintains the synovial fluid in the synovial cavity. In the joint of a patient with osteoarthritis (OA), the increased proliferation of synovial cells induces synovial fibrosis that results in joint swelling, stiffness, and pain. The increasing levels of synovium eventually affect the cartilage and bone tissue, inducing further degradation of the cartilage tissue and bone erosion. (B) The normal articular cartilage has a smooth extracellular matrix (ECM) that is mostly composed of aggrecan and collagen type II. Normally, chondrocytes remain in small spaces called lacunae. However, chondrocytes in a defected cartilage lesion undergo abnormal proliferation that leads to their de-differentiation into fibroblast-like fibrotic chondrocytes. Then, these chondrocytes secrete ECM proteins such as collagen type I instead of aggrecan or collagen type II. These changes lead to a stiffer type of cartilage and eventually completely change the characteristics of the articular cartilage.
Figure 1. Fibrosis in synovial and cartilage tissue. (A) The normal joint consists of a smooth layer of articular cartilage and a smooth layer of synovial membrane on the side that maintains the synovial fluid in the synovial cavity. In the joint of a patient with osteoarthritis (OA), the increased proliferation of synovial cells induces synovial fibrosis that results in joint swelling, stiffness, and pain. The increasing levels of synovium eventually affect the cartilage and bone tissue, inducing further degradation of the cartilage tissue and bone erosion. (B) The normal articular cartilage has a smooth extracellular matrix (ECM) that is mostly composed of aggrecan and collagen type II. Normally, chondrocytes remain in small spaces called lacunae. However, chondrocytes in a defected cartilage lesion undergo abnormal proliferation that leads to their de-differentiation into fibroblast-like fibrotic chondrocytes. Then, these chondrocytes secrete ECM proteins such as collagen type I instead of aggrecan or collagen type II. These changes lead to a stiffer type of cartilage and eventually completely change the characteristics of the articular cartilage.
Life 11 00003 g001
Life 11 00003 g002 550
Figure 2. Chondrocyte de-differentiation process in cartilage lesion. (A) When cartilage damage occurs, (B) chondrocytes that are embedded near the lesion become actively proliferative and start to change the surrounding environment by synthesizing collagen type I. (C) The proliferative chondrocytes eventually alter into a fibroblast-like characteristics and form a thick layer of fibrocartilage-like tissue and induce degradation and dedifferentiation in the nearby hyaline cartilage tissue.
Figure 2. Chondrocyte de-differentiation process in cartilage lesion. (A) When cartilage damage occurs, (B) chondrocytes that are embedded near the lesion become actively proliferative and start to change the surrounding environment by synthesizing collagen type I. (C) The proliferative chondrocytes eventually alter into a fibroblast-like characteristics and form a thick layer of fibrocartilage-like tissue and induce degradation and dedifferentiation in the nearby hyaline cartilage tissue.
Life 11 00003 g002
Life 11 00003 g003 550
Figure 3. The process of synovial fibrosis. (A) After cartilage damage occurs, (B) the abnormally proliferative chondrocytes near the lesion secrete pro-inflammatory factors that inflames the synovial membrane. (C) The pro-inflammatory factors eventually lead to hyperplasia of the synoviocytes and thicken the lining of the synovial membrane.
Figure 3. The process of synovial fibrosis. (A) After cartilage damage occurs, (B) the abnormally proliferative chondrocytes near the lesion secrete pro-inflammatory factors that inflames the synovial membrane. (C) The pro-inflammatory factors eventually lead to hyperplasia of the synoviocytes and thicken the lining of the synovial membrane.
Life 11 00003 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rim, Y.A.; Ju, J.H. The Role of Fibrosis in Osteoarthritis Progression. Life 2021, 11, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010003

AMA Style

Rim YA, Ju JH. The Role of Fibrosis in Osteoarthritis Progression. Life. 2021; 11(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rim, Yeri Alice, and Ji Hyeon Ju. 2021. "The Role of Fibrosis in Osteoarthritis Progression" Life 11, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010003

APA Style

Rim, Y. A., & Ju, J. H. (2021). The Role of Fibrosis in Osteoarthritis Progression. Life, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11010003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop