Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

See attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The paper must be proof read by a native speaker.

Author Response

Thank you for your constructive comments, we hope that you find this version more adequate and we remain at your disposal for more information on this paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This article is well written.

The results in this article are interesting and correct.

In my opinion, this article deserves to be published in the journal Axiom MDPI.

Author Response

Thank you for your constructive comments, we hope that you find this version more adequate and we remain at your disposal for more information on this paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors

Thank you for sharing your research. You may find an extensive list of remarks that should be answered/corrected in the attached file.

I am looking forward to re-reviewing your paper.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

A generous reading and rewriting of your paper would very much improve its quality.

Author Response

Thank you for your constructive comments, we hope that you find this version more adequate and we remain at your disposal for more information on this paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

All fine now, but equation (6) is after equation (7) and then there is another equation 7. 

Author Response

Thanks again for your constructive comments, we hope that you find this version more adequate and we remain at your disposal for more information on this paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors 

Thank you for considering my review suggestions. Only minor issues (please see the attached file) should be corrected, but once made my impression for publication is favorable.

Best regards

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks again for your constructive comments, we hope that you find this version more adequate and we remain at your disposal for more information on this paper.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf